XSU Case Study - Pm

download XSU Case Study - Pm

of 6

Transcript of XSU Case Study - Pm

  • 7/22/2019 XSU Case Study - Pm

    1/6

    Project Management

    (MGT 3125)Chapter 7

    Case: XSU Spring Concerts

  • 7/22/2019 XSU Case Study - Pm

    2/6

    Project Management (MGT 3125)

    Nayomi Ekanayake

    M00436434 1 | P a g e

    Chapter 7

    Case: XSU Spring Concerts

    Risk Identification

    Firstly, we can state that, as with most projects, there are several risks that occur when it comes to

    the execution of this spring concert. To make the risks more easily viewable, it is preferable to divide

    the risks into different sections and via that use the Risk Breakdown Structure, (RBS).There are four

    general categories that the risks are divided into: Technical, External, Organizational and Project

    Management. These risks are divided into more specific subcategories, which all of them can make

    or break the project.

    First of all the XSU entertainment committee has to get permissions and approvals from the city and

    XSU to be able to go through with the concert. There will be requirements that needs following during

    the concert as well.

    Regarding the technical category, some main risks are that the electricity and the sound system will

    be functioning, the constructing of the stage will go as planned and that there will be enough space

    for restroom facilities for 10 000 visitors and parking lots for 1000 cars. The stage-building depends

    on capable work force with required skills. There might be security issues by the stage or in the

    secluded beer-garden, which might arise if it gets too crowded and that would be disastrous as Hasta

    Weekend has a history of fatalities.

    When it comes to the external risk category there are some factors that the committee really cant

    affect, for example the weather can make this outdoor concert a hit or a disaster. There are a lot of

    sub-contractors involved, as well as vendors and artist. This demands many contracts, which can turn

    out wrong, and communication issues can emerge. If the committee cant sign a big artist to this

    eight-hour concert, there might be a huge loss of money, as there wont be enough visitors, and result

    in a bad reputation. That might also be a reaction to the event of not finding sufficient sponsors or

    suppliers.

  • 7/22/2019 XSU Case Study - Pm

    3/6

    Project Management (MGT 3125)

    Nayomi Ekanayake

    M00436434 2 | P a g e

    Security: Contingent measures should be put in place such as having a police team, medical and

    ambulances at standby just in case there is a need to quickly get into the crowd. Security personnel

    are supposed to have specially marked clothing. They should be provided with communication

    gadgets.

    Venue design: Organizers should consider crowd dynamics by erecting a performance stage leaving

    enough leeway between the crowd and performance. The stadium should be inspected in advance.

    Support staff: These should be hired preferably from security companies as they are well versed in

    crowd control and management. Regular staff with no prior training should be briefed beforehand

    about their roles.

    The following are the potential risks associated with the XSU Spring Concert scheduled to be held at

    Wahoo Stadium:-

    1. Concert violence2. Fire3. Excessive consumption of alcohol4. Use of hard drugs such as cocaine, heroin and cannabis5. Criminal activities

    When people get hot, they either drink, or they don't. Both carry risks. On a warm Summer evening,

    many people's refreshment of choice exposes them to more dangers than drinking nothing at all

    Soda and alcohol tend to dehydrate a body, and some drugs, such as Ecstasy, have a similar effect.

    Conversely, patrons who drink too little water for an evening of dancing and close contact can pass

    out and get trampled before anyone notices. Event staff and security must be trained to recognize

    signs of intoxication and heat-related distress, and water stations should be easily accessible to GA

    patrons.None of this is rocket science. If it were, the law would not require you to solve these riddles.

    It is precisely because this is reasonably foreseeable to a competent venue operator or security

    provider, and the solutions are reasonably available, that the law imposes a duty to address the risks

    of holding GA events. If you fail to adequately protect your patrons, then your venue may join the next

    parade of horribles.

  • 7/22/2019 XSU Case Study - Pm

    4/6

    Project Management (MGT 3125)

    Nayomi Ekanayake

    M00436434 3 | P a g e

    Warning signs are important and necessary, but in a crowded concourse or vom or on a dark GA

    floor, a written message may have little impact. Your event staff must be posted where patrons can

    easily ask questions, and event staff training must address your reasonably foreseeable risks. Also,

    make sure you keep a copy of your pre-event briefing in case it becomes an issue later. Your hourly

    minimum wage event staff might be long gone by the time a lawyer starts taking depositions, but your

    notes will be a lasting record of what your venue told patrons about the risks of that evening's event.

    Unlike moshing, which requires enough space for moshers to get a running start, surfing generally

    takes place where people are packed tightly enough to make it unlikely that a surfer will be dropped

    Assuming the surfer chooses a location with a high enough occupant load to stay aloft, the greatesrisk will again be to the innocent bystander who gets kicked in the head or has someone fall on them.

    And again, your primary options are prevention and warning.

    Most of the time, the biggest risk of moshing isn't to the moshers, who generally know what they're

    doing and how much pain is consistent with their idea of a good time. Instead, the risk is to patrons

    who aren't paying attention until someone crashes into them. If you have enough security to intervene

    wherever people start moshing, you may be able to prevent most of it. If you don't want to spend your

    crowd management resources that way, you will need to warn patrons what moshing is and what to

    do if they don't want to be near it. The more ways you help non-moshing patrons make informed

    decisions where to stand, the less liability your venue faces from a moshing injury

    There are relatively few surprises regarding crowd behavior. Even if the floor is at less than the fire

    marshal's maximum capacity, the occupant load can become excessive at the barricades separating

    the crowd from the stage. Just a few people into the crowd, individuals become virtually invisible once

    the house lights go down. Through countless crowd disasters, it is well-known that people can be

    lifted off their feet or asphyxiated by the bodies of other patrons. Because excessive crowd density is

    a problem inherent in any GA event, there are few good excuses for this reasonably foreseeable

    situation to turn into a disaster.

  • 7/22/2019 XSU Case Study - Pm

    5/6

    Project Management (MGT 3125)

    Nayomi Ekanayake

    M00436434 4 | P a g e

    Risk Assessment Form

    Risk Event Likelihood Impact DetectionDifficulty

    When

    Concert violence 5 5 5 Concert in

    progress

    End of concert

    Fire 3 4 3 Start-up

    Excessive consumption of

    alcohol

    5 5 5 Before start

    During concert

    Drug and substance

    abuse

    4 3 3 During concert

    Crime 5 5 4 During concert

    After concert

    A risk assessment is a systematic examination of a task, job or process that you carry out at work forthe purpose of;

    o Identifying the significant hazards that are present (a hazard is something that has the potential

    to cause someone harm or ill health).o Deciding if what you have already done reduces the risk of someone being harmed to an

    acceptable level, and if not;

    o Deciding what further control measures you must take to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

    Risk Assessments should also be carried out to satisfy the requirements of legislation but above all to

    ensure the Health & Safety of employees.

    Risk assessments should always be carried out by a person who is experienced and competent to doso, competence can be expressed as a combination of Knowledge, Awareness, training, and

    experience. If necessary consult a more experienced member of staff or external professional help to

    assist with the risk assessment.

  • 7/22/2019 XSU Case Study - Pm

    6/6

    Project Management (MGT 3125)

    Nayomi Ekanayake

    M00436434 5 | P a g e

    Risk response matrix

    Risk event Response Contingency plan Trigger Personresponsible

    Concert violence Reduce Hire more security staff

    Have the security teamstand at vantage points

    Pushing and shoving

    Reckless throwing ofobjects at each other

    X

    Fire Prevent Fire drills for support staff

    Mark fire exit routes

    Have smoke detectors

    Hire medical teams

    Fire alarm Y

    Excessiveconsumption ofalcohol

    Reduce Regulate bar opening andclosing hours

    High depletion of beerstocks

    Z

    Drug and substanceabuse

    Prevent Increased vigilance fromsupport staff

    Irrational crowdbehavior

    A

    Crime Prevent Request for policepresence

    Unusual and suspectmovements

    B