[XLS]CJIS-1U - Missouri Uniform Crime Reporting Home · Web viewA. UCR Point of Contact B....

CJIS-1U 1 REVISED: June 1, 2011

UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING(SUMMARY EDITION)

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW(QAR)

QAR SUMMARY REPORT

REVIEW DATE: WINDOW/CYCLE:

AGENCY NAME:

AGENCY ORI:

POC:

EXIT BRIEFED: YES NO

CEO

EXIT BRIEFED: YES NO

REVIEW TEAM LEADER

REVIEW TEAM MEMBERS:

PEER REVIEW: DATE:

MGT. REVIEW: DATE:

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: TO

The below signature certifies that:a.

b.c.

SIGNATURE:

TITLE:

DATE:

MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYMISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SERVICES (CJIS) DIVISION

Add Findings and Recommendations

Add Peer Comments Add Mgt. Comments Modifications

Any infractions and recommendation(s) for correction have been explained to my

Any general recommendation(s) were explained. A copy of the findings and recommendations will be left with me.

SHOW UCR TIPS

understanding.

√ SPELL CHECK

http://www.dps.mo.gov/

http://www.mshp.dps.missouri.gov/MSHPWeb/index.html

http://www.mshp.dps.missouri.gov/MSHPWeb/PatrolDivisions/CRID/index.html


Findings and Recommendations:


Findings and Recommendations (Continued):Back to Top

A102

Enter all findings and recommendations regarding the QAR here. Do not exceed column I. Do not use the enter key. Use the down arrow key to navigate from line to line.


Peer Review Comments:Back to Top


Management Review Comments:Back to Top


Missouri Department of Public SafetyMissouri State Highway Patrol

Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division

Uniform Crime Reporting, Quality Assurance Review Modification Summary Sheet

00

Dear: 0

On 12/30/1899 the0

received a Quality Assurance Review of its Uniform Crime Reporting Procedures. order to further assure accurate and reliable crime reporting, the report under goesprocess of peer and management review within the CJIS Division. During this process it was determined that the following modifications to the QAR SummaryReport are required and that these modifications adversely effect youragencies compliance findings.

DATA QUALITY REVIEW

ORIGINAL % COMPLIANT:MODIFIED % COMPLIANT:

Incident Number was originally scored as It should have been scored as

Incident Number was originally scored as

Back to Top


It should have been scored as









Comments:

Back to Top


SUMMARY OF FINDINGS BY TOPIC

ORIGINAL % COMPLIANT:MODIFIED % COMPLIANT:

Subject Area question number was originally scored as It should have been scored as






Subject Area question number

Back to Top


was originally scored as It should have been scored as




Comments:

Missouri State Highway PatrolCriminal Justice Information Services DivisionProgram Support ServicesP.O. Box 9500Jefferson City, MO 65102Phone: (573) 526-6278E-mail: [email protected]

Back to Top

For questions or additional information regarding these modifications, pleasecontact the CJIS Manager, MoUCR Program Office:


Back to Top


DATA QUALITY REVIEW

PART I LEOKAOVER REPORTING 0UNDER REPORTING 0

**CLASSIFICATION**INACCURATE 0TOTAL ERRORS 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL REVIEWED 0ERROR RATE (%) 0%

DATA QUALITY REVIEW TALLY SHEET

1. Criminal Homicide (Includes 1a and 1b 2. Forcible Rape (Includes 2a and 2b 3. Robbery (Includes 3a, 3b, 3c and 3d) 4. Aggravated Assault (Includes 4a, 4b, 4c and 4d) 5. Burglary (Includes 5a, 5b and 5c) 6. Larceny 7. Motor Vehicle Theft (Includes 7a, 7b and 7c) 8. Arson 9. Simple Assault (Includes 4e)10. DV related Suicide 1d11. Hate Crimes12. Domestic Violence Incidents13. Other

PART II (arrests)

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Error Rate % = Total Errors/Total Reviewed X ...

√ SPELL CHECK


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


DATA QUALITY REVIEW SUMMARY - DISCREPANCY REPORT

NUMBER OF REPORTS REVIEWED:

PERIOD REVIEWED FROM: TO

INDEX OVER REPORTING

INDEX UNDER REPORTING

INDEX INACCURATE REPORTING

ARRESTS: INACCURATE UNDER OVER

LEOKA: INACCURATE UNDER OVER

HATE CRIME: INACCURATE UNDER OVER

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: INACCURATE UNDER OVER

PROPERTY VALUES INACCURATE UNDER OVER

0 TOTAL DISCREPANCIES

COMMENTS:


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


PART I OFFENSES PART II OFFENSESIncident Number Incident Date UCR Code R or A Incident Number

Back to Top


PART II OFFENSESIncident Number Incident Date UCR Code R or A



Top of Page Back to Top

CJIS-1U 29 REVISED:June 1, 2011

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS BY TOPIC

SUBJECT AREA N/AA. UCR Point of Contact 2 0 0B. Classification - Part I 3 0 0C. Classification - Part II 5 0 0D. Offense Scoring 2 0 0E. Property Values 2 0 0F. LEOKA 6 0 0G. Hate Crimes 1 0 0H. Domestic Violence 4 0 0 0I. Clandestine Drug Lab Incidents 1 0 0J. Jurisdiction 3 0 0K. Clearances 5 0 0L. Arrests 1 0 0M. Adjustments 1 0 0N. Timeliness of Reporting 3 0 0TOTAL 39 0 0 0Number Applicable 39% Compliant (of applicable) 0%

TOTAL ITEMS

MEETS STANDARDS

DOES NOT MEET STANDARDS

Number Applicable = Total - N/A Col...% Compliant = Number Meets Standards / Number Applicable...

√ SPELL CHECK


QAR QUESTIONNAIREA. UCR POINT OF CONTACT (2)

1. What source documents do you use to compile the UCR?Calls for Service Complaint Cards Investigative ReportsOther (Auditor has reviewed and the report used contains sufficient data)Other (Auditor has reviewed and the report does not contain sufficient data)

References: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 7

2. Are offenses classified using the national standard offense definitions when reported to the state program?YESNO (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO).


Comments: (For use when agency responds incorrectly.)


MEETS STANDAR...DOES NOT MEETS STANDA...



B. CLASSIFICATION - PART I (3)1. If multiple offenses are committed by the same offender during the same incident, for example a Burglary, Larceny, and Vandalism, do you apply the Hierarchy Rule when classifying the incident?

YESNO (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO).


2. Does your agency report the sub-classification of Robbery, Burglary, and Larceny offenses on page 2 of the Supplement to Return A using the standard UCR definitions?

YESNO (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO).


3. If an incident involves Arson in addition to other Part I offenses, such as Homicides or Assaults from the fire, what offenses would you report to the UCR program?

Both the Arson and the Part I offenseArson Other Part I Other


Return to Top








C. CLASSIFICATION - PART II (5)1. If a person were arrested on several Part II offenses, how would you classify the arrest?

Agency determines the most serious YES NONOTE: Other Assault - Simple should not be included within the scope of this question. It should

always be reported as a Return A reportable offense.References: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 26 Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 97

2. Arrests for sales/manufacturing/distribution and possession of methamphetamine belong in which offense class? Opium or Cocaine Synthetic Narcotics

Marijuana Other Dangerous non-narcotic drugsReferences: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 143

3. Do you report all violations of state or local laws (excluding traffic violations) that are not specifically identified as Part I or Part II offenses, under the 26 All Other Offenses coding classification?

YES NOReferences: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 146

4. If a person is arrested as an aider, abettor, conspirator, solicitor, or accessory; do you score the arrest using the offense classification in which the offender was involved?


Return to Top









5. In what offense category do you classify Domestic Assault arrests?Aggravated or Simple Assault based upon the seriousness of the injuryOtherReferences: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 26, paragraph 2

Return to Top





D. OFFENSE SCORING (2)1, How does your agency score crimes against persons on the Return A?

One per victim OtherReferences: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 41

2. How does your agency score crimes against property on the Return A?One per distinct operation Other

(Note the exceptions for Motor Vehicle Theft)References: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 41

Return to Top






E. PROPERTY VALUES (2)1. Does your agency use the following categories when determining property values for items that are reported stolen and recovered? (If agency answers no to any or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they do not meet the standards)

1. Fair market value for articles that are subject to depreciation.2. Cost to the merchant of goods stolen from retail establishments, warehouses, etc.3. Victim's evaluation of items such as jewelry, watches, and other similar goods which decrease in value slightly or not at all with use or age.4. Replacement value or actual cash cost to a victim for new or almost new items that depreciate in value over time, e.g. clothes. auto accessories, bicycles.5. When the victim obviously exaggerates the value of stolen property for insurance or other purposes, do your officer's use common sense and good judgment when determining the fair market value.

YESNO


2. Does your agency record the value of property stolen and recovered for the following 11 type classifications? (If agency answers no to any or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they do not meet the standards)

A.. Currency, Notes, etc. J. Livestock (not pets)B. Jewelry and Precious Metals K. MiscellaneousC. Clothing and FursD. Locally Stolen Motor Vehicles YESE. Office Equipment NOF. Televisions, Radios, Stereos, etc.G. FirearmsH. Household Goods

Return to Top




I. Consumable Goods

References: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 87 and 88

F. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED OR ASSAULTED (6)1. Do you report Law Enforcement Officers Killed or Assaulted (LEOKA)? (If agency answers no or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they do not meet the standards)


2. Do you count all assaults on officers that involve more than mere verbal abuse or minor resistance to an arrest? (If agency answers no or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they don't meet the standards)


3. Do you ensure that the officer assaults and homicides and their clearances are also reported on the Return A for that month? (If agency answers no or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they don't meet the standards)

YES NO



Return to Top








4. Does your agency determine whether the victim qualifies as a "Law Enforcement Officer" for the purpose of LEOKA reporting using the following guidelines? (If agency answers no or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they do not meet the standards)

Be working in an official capacity?Have full arrest powers?Wear a badge (ordinarily)?Carry a firearm (ordinarily)Be paid from governmental funds set aside specifically for payment of sworn law enforcementrepresentatives?


5. Do you report only assaults on your officers or all assaults on officers that occur within your reporting jurisdiction on the LEOKA report? (If agency answers b or if during the data quality review it is determined they report all officer assaults then they do not meet the standards)

a. Their officer's only b. All officer'sReferences: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 109

6. If your agency has no LEOKA incidents to report in a given month, do you mark the "NO LAW

Return to Top







ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED OR ASSAULTED…" box on the Return A? (If agency answers no or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they do not meet the standards)


G. HATE CRIMES (1)1. Do you report hate crime information to the UCR program when such incidents occur within your reporting jurisdiction? (If the agency answers no or if during the data quality review it is determined they don't then they do not meet the standards)



Return to Top





H. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (4)MANDATORY (1)

1. When reporting Domestic Violence-Related Homicide or Suicide, does the agency properly report the incident on the Supplemental Homicide Report (Columns 10 - 14)? (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO)

YES NOReference: (Missouri UCR Supplement to FBI Handbook, August 2005, 40.0.10 - 40.0.14

H. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (4)VOLUNTARY (3)

2. Do you report to MoUCR all incidents of domestic violence regardless of whether or not an arrest is made? (If no then all questions are N/A, move to the next section since this is voluntary under th state program) YES NO (All N/A) AGENCY REQUIRES AN ARREST

Reference: (Missouri UCR Supplement to FBI Handbook, August 2005, 40.0.10 - 40.0.14

Return to Top






3. What level or type of activity has to occur before you report it to UCR as a domestic violence incident?Agency reports disputes that cross the abuse threshold as defined in RSMo Chapter 455, Section 455.010(i.e. a pattern of harassment to include stalking, coercion, assault, sexual assault, battery, or unlawfulimprisonment). (If anything other than this they do not meet the standards)OtherReference: (Missouri UCR Supplement to FBI Handbook, August 2005, 40.0.10 - 40.0.14

4. When there are multiple relationships involved in one incident, does your agency determine which relationship to report by selecting the highest relationship in the incident? (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO.)

YES NOReference: (Missouri UCR Supplement to FBI Handbook, August 2005, 40.0.10 - 40.0.14

I. CLANDESTINE DRUG LAB INCIDENTS (1)1. When your agency has a clandestine drug laboratory seizure, lab equipment seizure, or clan lab dump site, do you prepare and submit a DEA Form 612 National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure Report, refer the incident to the Drug Task Force for reporting or do you take some other action?

Agency completes DEA 612 Agency refers to DTF Other

Reference: Missouri UCR Supplement to FBI Handbook, August 2005, 5.0)


Return to Top



MEETS STANDAR...DOES NOT MEETS STANDA...N/A




J. JURISDICTION (3)1. Does your agency apply the "Most Local Jurisdiction" rule for reporting offenses on the Return A and arrests on the ASR forms? (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO)


2. If your agency has an outstanding warrant on a suspect for Burglary in your jurisdiction and officers in another jurisdiction arrest him on the warrant, would your agency report the arrest and Burglary clearance? (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO)


Return to Top







3. When one of your officers recovers property that was stolen in another jurisdiction, do you report the property's value to the UCR Program? (If during the data quality review it is determined they do the answer must be YES and then the agency does not meet the standards)(Note exception for state agencies)

YES NO


K. CLEARANCES (5)1. Does your agency identify and include in the monthly UCR all clearances of Return A reportable offenses including those offenses reported in a previous month? (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO)


2. What criteria does your agency use to determine if an offense should be cleared by arrest? (If the agency answers no to any or it is determined during the data quality review they do not follow these requirements then they do not meet the standards)

At least one individual is arrested for the offenseCharged with the offense YES NOTurned over to the court for prosecution



Return to Top




DOES NOT MEETS STANDA...MEETS STANDAR...



3. Does your agency ensure that before exceptionally clearing an offense, the following questions are answered "YES"? (If the agency answers no to any or it is determined during the data quality review they do not follow these requirements then they do not meet the standards)

1. Has the investigation definitely established the identity of the offender?2. Is there enough information to support an arrest, charge, and turning over to the court for prosecution?3. Is the exact location of the offender know so that the subject could be taken into custody now?4. Is there some reason outside law enforcement control that precludes arresting, charging and prosecuting the offender?

YES NOReferences: Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, p. 80 and 81

4. Does your agency include in Column 6 of the Return A those offenses that were reported as cleared in Column 5 and involved only those under the age of 18? (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not the answer must be NO)


5. When a case is closed due to a lack of evidence or an administrative reason, do you report the offense as "cleared" for UCR purposes? (If during the data quality review it is determined they do the answer must be YES and then the agency does not meet the standards)

YES NO



Return to Top







L. ARRESTS (1)1. What source documents do you use to provide arrest information to the UCR program? (If during the data quality it is determined they don't then they do not meet the standards)

Arrest ReportsCitationsSummonsesOther (Auditor must review to ensure the report used contains sufficient data)


M. ADJUSTMENTS (1)1. Do you adjust your reports when developments in the investigation makes it necessary to unfound,

Return to Top





reclassify, or subtract an offense that was reported in a previous month? (If during the data quality review it is determined that are not the answer must be NO)


N. TIMELINESS OF REPORTING (3)1. Are all monthly UCR reports and requests for clarifications of questionable or incomplete date for your agency submitted to the state program within the required timeframe? (If during the data quality review it is determined they are not then they do not meet the standards and the answer must be NO)


2. Does your agency properly report on the Return A all Part I offenses when they are reported or become known to the police? (If during data quality it is determined they do not then they do not meet the standards and the answer must be NO)



Return to Top





3. Does your agency properly report on the Age/Sex/Race arrest reports all arrests, citations and summons issued for Part I and Part II crimes in the month they occur? (If during the data quality review it is determined they do not then they do not meet the standards and the answer must be NO)


4. Does your agency have the most current editions of the UCR Handbook and the MoUCR Supplement to the UCR Handbook?

YES NO



Return to Top




Supplemental Scenario's for QARThe supplemental scenarios are to be used optionally as a training aide for agencies that may be experiencingdifficulty classifying offenses or as data quality review for those agencies that have not reported the minimum

of crime data.

1. A husband and wife had an argument. The wife shot the husband and severely wounded him. He grabbed the gun and shot and killed her. The husband survived his wounds. The police subsequently arrested

Offense Classification:

2. Law enforcement received a complaint from a victim who claimed that when she was leaving work late one night, she was attacked in the company parking lot by an unidentified male and forcibly raped. The


3. A person with a shotgun entered a rural grocery store and ordered the clerk to hand over the cash. The clerk complied. The suspect ran out of the store to a waiting car. The clerk notified police. The police spotted the suspect's vehicle and engaged in a high-speed chase. They apprehended a 17-year old suspect.


4. A man came home drunk. During an argument with his wife, he slapped her with an open hand and broke


5. A married couple was arguing about financial problems. The husband slapped his wife and left the house. The wife followed him, and they continued their argument. The police responded to a call by a neighbor. The wife told them that her husband slapped her. The police arrested the husband for domestic violence.


6. A liquor store was broken into on a holiday when the store was closed. The next day, the manager found


7. Two persons entered a hardware store together. While on engaged the clerk in a discussion in the back of



9. The police and fire investigators determined a fire was deliberately set in a single-family home valued at $165,000. Rescue workers assisted in helping the family escape; however, a child aged 8, died at the scene from smoke inhalation. No arrests were made.


him. (1a - Criminal Homicide/Domestic Violence)

offender was not apprehended. (2a -Forcible Rape)

(3a - Robbery/Firearm)

her jaw. The police arrested the husband, but his wife refused to prosecute. (4d - Aggravated Assault Hands, Fists, Feet, etc./Domestic Violence)

(4e - Other Assault Simple/Domestic Violence)

alcoholic beverages and money were missing and called police. (5a - Burglary Forced Entry)

the store, the other stole a power saw valued at $125. (6 - Larceny/Shoplifting)

8. A taxi was stolen from a parking lot. The police recovered it in another city. (7a - Motor Vehicle Theft/Auto)

(1a - Criminal Homicide and 8a - Arson Structural Single Occupancy Residential)

√ SPELL CHECK


DATA QUALITY REVIEW - DISCREPANCY REPORTAGENCY NAME: 0

ORI:MO 0 REVIEW DATE: 12/30/99INCIDENT NUMBER: INCIDENT DATE:

PERIOD REVIEWED FROM: 12/30/99 TO: 12/30/99

INDEX OVER REPORTINGINDEX UNDER REPORTINGINACCURATE CLASSIFICATION

INACCURATE UNDER OVERARREST:

LEOKA:HATE CRIME:

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:PROPERTY VALUES:


OVER REPORTING

the UCR Program.ASSAULTS

1. Agency reported Aggravated Assault, QAR determined that Simple Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.2. Aggravated Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

UNDER REPORTING

should have been reported to theUCR Program.

ASSAULTS1. Agency reported Simple Assault, QAR determined that Aggravated Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.2, Aggravated Assault was not reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault was not reported to the UCR Program - does not change Crime Index.

should not have been reported to

√ SPELL CHECK


CLASSIFICATIONAgency reported ; QAR

determined it should be reported as A Cross Offense Misclassification of the Part I Offenses may change the Crime Index, i.e. Larceny was reported as Fraud.

ARREST Agency case report indicated an arrest should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated an arrest should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A reportable arrest was reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

HATE CRIME Agency case report indicated a hate crime should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a hate crime should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A hate crime reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

LEOKA Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A LEOKA reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A DV Incident reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

PROPERTY VALUES Agency case report indicated a property values should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a property values should not have been reported to the UCR Program. Property values reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING


ASSAULTS1. Agency reported Simple Assault, QAR determined that Aggravated Assault should have

Return to Top



been reported to the UCR Program.2, Aggravated Assault was not reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault was not reported to the UCR Program - does not change Crime Index.








Return to Top


COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING

Return to Top











PROPERTY VALUES

Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a property values should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a property values should not have been reported to the UCR Program. Property values reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING


1. Agency reported Aggravated Assault, QAR determined that Simple Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.2. Aggravated Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top



3. Simple Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

UNDER REPORTING








DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top


A DV Incident reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as


COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING

the UCR Program.

Return to Top



ASSAULTS1. Agency reported Aggravated Assault, QAR determined that Simple Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.2. Aggravated Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

UNDER REPORTING








Return to Top




COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



Return to Top


OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING







LEOKA


Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A LEOKA reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as



COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

Return to Top


PROPERTY VALUES:


OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING






HATE CRIME Agency case report indicated a hate crime should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a hate crime should not have been reported to the UCR Program.


Return to Top


A hate crime reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as




COMMENTS





INACCURATE UNDER OVER

Return to Top


ARREST:LEOKA:

HATE CRIME:DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

PROPERTY VALUES:


OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING







Return to Top






COMMENTS




INDEX OVER REPORTINGINDEX UNDER REPORTING

Return to Top


INACCURATE CLASSIFICATION


LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING





ARREST


Return to Top


Agency case report indicated an arrest should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated an arrest should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A reportable arrest was reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as





COMMENTS




Return to Top




LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING




determined it should be reported as


Return to Top


A Cross Offense Misclassification of the Part I Offenses may change the Crime Index, i.e. Larceny was reported as Fraud.






COMMENTS

DATA QUALITY REVIEW - DISCREPANCY REPORTReturn to Top


AGENCY NAME: 0ORI:MO 0 REVIEW DATE: 12/30/99

INCIDENT NUMBER: INCIDENT DATE:PERIOD REVIEWED FROM: 12/30/99 TO: 12/30/99



LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING











PROPERTY VALUES Agency case report indicated a property values should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a property values should not have been reported to the UCR Program. Property values reported to the UCR Program as

should have been reported as

COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING


ASSAULTS1. Agency reported Simple Assault, QAR determined that Aggravated Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top



2, Aggravated Assault was not reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault was not reported to the UCR Program - does not change Crime Index.








Return to Top


COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING

should have been reported to the

Return to Top



UCR Program.ASSAULTS

1. Agency reported Simple Assault, QAR determined that Aggravated Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.2, Aggravated Assault was not reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault was not reported to the UCR Program - does not change Crime Index.







PROPERTY VALUES Agency case report indicated a property values should have been reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a property values should not have been reported to the UCR Program. Property values reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



Return to Top



UNDER REPORTING








DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A DV Incident reported to the UCR Program as

Return to Top




COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING


Return to Top




UNDER REPORTING








Return to Top




COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING

Return to Top




UNDER REPORTING







LEOKA Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should have been reported to the UCR Program.


Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A LEOKA reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as



COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:


Return to Top



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING






HATE CRIME Agency case report indicated a hate crime should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a hate crime should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A hate crime reported to the UCR Program as


Return to Top






COMMENTS






Return to Top


LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING







Return to Top






COMMENTS





Return to Top



LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING





ARREST Agency case report indicated an arrest should have been reported to the UCR Program.


Return to Top


Agency case report indicated an arrest should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A reportable arrest was reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as





COMMENTS




Return to Top




LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING




determined it should be reported as A Cross Offense Misclassification of the Part I Offenses may change the Crime Index, i.e. Larceny


Return to Top


was reported as Fraud.






COMMENTS


Return to Top






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING




Return to Top









COMMENTS







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING


ASSAULTS1. Agency reported Simple Assault, QAR determined that Aggravated Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.2, Aggravated Assault was not reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top



3. Simple Assault was not reported to the UCR Program - does not change Crime Index.








COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING


Return to Top










PROPERTY VALUES Agency case report indicated a property values should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a property values should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top


Property values reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as

COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



Return to Top



UNDER REPORTING









Return to Top



COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING


1. Agency reported Aggravated Assault, QAR determined that Simple Assault should have

Return to Top



been reported to the UCR Program.2. Aggravated Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

UNDER REPORTING








DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT

Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A DV Incident reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as


COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING

Return to Top




UNDER REPORTING







LEOKA Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should not have been reported to the UCR Program.


Return to Top


A LEOKA reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as



COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:


Return to Top



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING








Return to Top





COMMENTS






LEOKA:

Return to Top


HATE CRIME:DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

PROPERTY VALUES:


OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING






HATE CRIME


Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a hate crime should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a hate crime should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A hate crime reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as




COMMENTS





Return to Top



LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING





ARREST Agency case report indicated an arrest should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated an arrest should not have been reported to the UCR Program.


Return to Top


A reportable arrest was reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as





COMMENTS




Return to Top




LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING






Return to Top







COMMENTS


ORI:MO 0 REVIEW DATE: 12/30/99

Return to Top


INCIDENT NUMBER: INCIDENT DATE:PERIOD REVIEWED FROM: 12/30/99 TO: 12/30/99



LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



CLASSIFICATION


Return to Top


Agency reported ; QAR determined it should be reported as A Cross Offense Misclassification of the Part I Offenses may change the Crime Index, i.e. Larceny was reported as Fraud.






COMMENTS







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING



Return to Top










COMMENTS

Return to Top







LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING


ASSAULTS

Return to Top



1. Agency reported Simple Assault, QAR determined that Aggravated Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.2, Aggravated Assault was not reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault was not reported to the UCR Program - does not change Crime Index.







PROPERTY VALUES Agency case report indicated a property values should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a property values should not have been reported to the UCR Program. Property values reported to the UCR Program as

Return to Top



COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING

Return to Top











Return to Top



COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING


1. Agency reported Aggravated Assault, QAR determined that Simple Assault should havebeen reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top



2. Aggravated Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.3. Simple Assault should not have been reported to the UCR Program.

UNDER REPORTING








DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should have been reported to the UCR Program.

Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a DV Incident should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A DV Incident reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as


COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



OVER REPORTING

Return to Top





UNDER REPORTING







LEOKA Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should have been reported to the UCR Program. Agency case report indicated a LEOKA should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A LEOKA reported to the UCR Program as

Return to Top





COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:



Return to Top


OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING








Return to Top





COMMENTS






LEOKA:HATE CRIME:

Return to Top




OVER REPORTING



UNDER REPORTING






HATE CRIME Agency case report indicated a hate crime should have been reported to the UCR Program.


Return to Top


Agency case report indicated a hate crime should not have been reported to the UCR Program. A hate crime reported to the UCR Program as should have been reported as




COMMENTS

Return to Top

[XLS]CJIS-1U - Missouri Uniform Crime Reporting Home · Web viewA. UCR Point of Contact B....

Documents

Transcript of [XLS]CJIS-1U - Missouri Uniform Crime Reporting Home · Web viewA. UCR Point of Contact B....