X-ray Astronomy School 2002 The Future of X-ray Astronomy Keith Arnaud NASA/GSFC and UMCP.
-
Upload
norah-thompson -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
1
Transcript of X-ray Astronomy School 2002 The Future of X-ray Astronomy Keith Arnaud NASA/GSFC and UMCP.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
• High sensitivity, high resolution spectroscopy.
• Polarimetry
• Interferometry
Theme
In the first 40 years of X-ray astronomy we increased sensitivity by a factor of 109, image resolution by 2.5x105, spectral resolution by 104. How do we keep this progress up for the next 40 years ?
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
About 150 years ago, James Joule and Julius von Mayer independently determined that HEAT = ENERGY, and calorimetry was born.
But, only about 20 years ago, the power of performing calorimetric measurements at very low temperatures (< 0.1 K) was realized, independently, by Harvey Moseley and by Etorre Fiorini and Tapio Niinikoski. This is called MICROCALORIMETRY, or occasionally QUANTUM CALORIMETRY, because of its ability to measure the energy of individual photons or particles with high sensitivity.
Calorimetry
Stahle
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
Microcalorimeters vs. Gratings• Resolutions comparable with gratings. Microcalorimeters win at high energies, gratings at low energies.
• Non-dispersive so :
o high efficiency
o low background
o no problems for extended sources
o wide bandpass
• However, microcalorimeters are cryogenic experiments requiring cooling to ~60 mK.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
A Multiwavelength Note
• Microcalorimeters were first developed for IR and are being used on IR astronomy space missions.
• They are also being used on optical telescopes - where they provide filter type spectral resolution without using filters.
• They are also used in laboratory dark matter searches.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
X-rays on Ice
The XRS X-ray microcalorimeter built for Astro-E (the fifth Japanese X-ray astronomy satellite)
Resolution :
9 - 12 eV FWHM
(0.5 - 10 keV)
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
Inserting the He dewar in the Ne
dewar
A solid Ne dewar outside a liquid He dewar outside an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator.
You really don’t want to see this
Astro-E is being rebuilt as Astro-E2 and will be launched in Jan/Feb 2005.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
654321
25
20
15
10
5
0
5.25.15.04.94.84.7
Li Be
He Li
Be B
B C
(c)
4000
3000
2000
1000
01.201.151.101.051.000.950.90
+ Li6Be8 Li5
Be9
Li3
Li1
Be2
Be1
(a)
1000
800
600
400
200
01.201.151.101.051.000.95
Li6Be8
Li5
Be9
Li3
Li1
Be2
Be1
C10
Li2
Photon Energy (keV)
CrystalSpectrometer
(b)
Radiative Recombination
Direct Excitation
Photon energy (keV)
Photon Energy (keV)
E = 3.0 keVbeam
Broad-band Calorimeterspectrum
Laboratory Astrophysics with a Microcalorimeter
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
oUse X-ray spectroscopy to observeBlack holes: strong gravity & evolutionLarge scale structure in the Universe & trace
the underlying dark matterProduction and recycling of the elements
oMission parametersTelescope area: 3 m2 at 1 keV 100 times XMM/Chandra for high res. spectraSpectral resolving power: 300-3,000 5 times improvement at 6 keVBand pass: 0.25 to 40 keV 100 times more sensitive at 40 keV
Constellation-X Overview
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
1480 1485 1490 1495 1500 15050
20
40
60
80
100
120
Energy (eV)
Cou
nts
per
0.25
eV
bin
Instrument Resolution:
2.0 0.1 eV FWHMAl K1,2
Al K3,4
Bismuth absorber
TES Al/Ag bilayer
450 counts/sec
K. Irwin
Calorimeter developement
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
Goddard Mo/Au TES:2.4 +/- 0.2 eV at 1.5 keV and 3.7 +/- 0.2 eV at 3.3 keV.
Al Kinto 300 x 300 micron TES
K Kinto 500 x 500 micron TES
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
McKee-Taylor Decadal Survey
“Constellation-x observatory is the premier instrument to probe the formation and evolution of black holes... The first clusters of galaxies... Quasars at high redshift... And the formation of the chemical elements…”
“Constellation-x will complement Chandra, much as Keck and Gemini complement HST…”
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
• ESA proposed mission for low Earth orbit.
• 6 m2 of collecting area at 1 keV.
• Imaging resolution goal of 2" HEW (Half Energy Width) at 1 keV.
• Limiting sensitivity 100 times deeper than XMM-NEWTON.
XEUS
• Spectral resolution of 1 to 10 eV between 0.05 and 30 keV.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
• After completion of the initial 4-6 year mission phase, XEUS will rendezvous with the ISS for refurbishment and adding extra mirror area.
• New detector spacecraft with next generation of focal plane technologies.
• Grown mirror will have 30 m2 collecting area at 1 keV; 3 m2 at 8 keV.
• Sensitivity 250 times better than XMM-NEWTON.
XEUS II
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
Generation Xo Scientific goal: to probe the X-ray emission from the universe at z = 5-10.
o An effective area of 150 m2 at 1 keV with an angular resolution of ~ 0.1 arc second.
o Detect sources 1000 times fainter than Chandra (flux limit of 2 x 10-20 ergs/cm2/s).
o Obtain high resolution spectra from sources 100-1000 x fainter than observable by Constellation-X.
o Six identical satellites with 40 to 150 m focal length to L2.
Telescope Evolution
No. of mods
Angular HPD
Eff. Area @ 1 keV (cm2 ) per mod.
Mass (kg) per
mod.
Notes
Chandra 1 0.5" 1,000 1,000 Ground and polished glass shells
XMM-Newton 3 15" 1,500 420 Replicated Ni shells
Astro-E 5 90" 400 12 Replicated Al segments
Constellation-X
4 15" 7,500 420 Material and technology under study/development
Generation-X 6 0.1" 250,000 3,000 Materials and fabrication technology to be determined
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
Why X-ray Polarimetry ?• Because it’s there ! Whenever we look at the Universe in a new way we make unexpected discoveries.
• We expect polarization from X-ray synchrotron sources such as SNR and jets. Also from X-ray reflection in binaries and AGN.
• There is one detection of X-ray polarization - that of the Crab Nebula SNR.
• No X-ray polarimeter has flown on a satellite since the 1970s.
• There is a new idea for a more efficient polarimeter…
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
Accumulation of many events5.9 KeV unpolarized 5.4 KeV polarized
Bellazzini et al.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
X-ray Interferometry
• While astronomical sensitivity has increased by a vast factor imaging resolution has not. HST is only 100 times better than Galileo’s telescope.
• To do better requires interferometry.
• Radio interferometry is well developed but baselines are very long and few sources have high enough surface brightness in the radio band.
• Optical interferometry is in the experimental stage and milliarcsec resolutions should be achievable.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002
X-ray Interferometry II
The X-ray band is the natural place for interferometry !
• Microarcsecond resolutions are possible with a baseline of ~10 meters.
• X-ray sources have very high surface brightness on microarcsecond scales.
X-ray interferometry allows virtual interstellar travel…