Document
description
Transcript of Document
![Page 1: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
www.lunarsites-scotland.net
New Evidence for Precise Lunar Alignments Early Bronze Age Argyll Scotland
![Page 2: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
www.lunarsites-scotland.net
New Evidence for Precise Lunar Alignments Early Bronze Age Argyll Scotland
![Page 3: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Alexander Thom’s Lunar investigations (1960’s + 70’s)
![Page 4: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Alexander Thom’s Lunar investigations (1960’s + 70’s)
Re-assessment by Professor Clive Ruggles (1980’s) showed a number of issues / errors of his 42 best lines, including :-
● Many lines not properly indicated
● Some errors of identification
● Selection of horizon features
● Variable types of backsight
● Wide geographical spread
It was considered that chance could explain the results.
![Page 5: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Precise Alignments post Thom
Thom found that some precise alignments exist, so there are two key questions:-
● Are they common?
● Are they chance or were they planned?
The present investigation set out to try to answer
these questions.
![Page 6: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Present Investigation Acknowledge and address the above criticisms
ARGYLL●Choose one area only
● Only standing stones, pairs and short rows as backsights● And, within this group, NO selection
The essential question of Real or Chance is discussed later
![Page 7: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MAJOR STANDSTILL - NORTH
Declination +29º 03’ ( ~ 1700 BC )
The ‘Wobble’ (or Delta, symbol Δ) is about 9’
Δ
Δ
![Page 8: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
18’
X
![Page 9: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
X
![Page 10: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
X
X
X
![Page 11: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ONLY THESE DECLINATIONS ARE MEANINGFUL
+29°03’
THE LUNAR BAND
53’
![Page 12: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Azimuth for lunar bands (Schematic)
N
90º
180º
Rising
Setti
ng
270º Ew
s
![Page 13: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Indicated direction from a backsight
3°
![Page 14: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
‘Wobble’ Declinations
Δ
Δ
37º 37.5º 38º
2º
36.5º36º
![Page 15: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2º
2.5º
37° 37.5° 38°
28° 56’.5
28° 56’.3
2.5°
2°
Δ
Ford (Argyll)
![Page 16: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary of the Results
In the region examined:-
34 Sites -- 12 Sites - Stones fallen, Trees on horizon etc.and are not surveyable
-- 5 have no indicated direction and/or have plausible other explanations (e.g. ‘Waymarkers’)
-- 1 remains of a stone circle -- 3 uncertain
--This leaves 13 sites In accordance with the earlier statement, within this group there has been NO selection
They ALL gave a precise lunar alignment
![Page 17: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Upper Limb
Lower Limb
9’ Δ
29º 8’.429º 9’.5
Indicated Foresight
44º 46º45º43º42º
7º
ACHARA
![Page 18: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
196º 196º.5 197º 197º.5
2º.5
3º
-28º 38’.5
-28º 38’.6
2º
Onich
Upper Limb
Lower Limb
9’ Δ
![Page 19: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
South SSW
(There are no other distant skylines)
Rocky RidgeSalachary
![Page 20: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Salachary
![Page 21: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
S2 S3To ‘Notch’
‘Q’ Four stone group
S1
Nether Largie (Temple Wood)
![Page 22: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Nether Largie (Temple Wood)
+28º 56’.5
+28º 56’.2
S1
![Page 23: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
To Foresight
Ballymeanach (Duncragaig)
To Foresight
Rock Outcrop
![Page 24: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Foresight outcrop (1.5 – 2 m in height)
Ballymeanach (Duncragaig)
![Page 25: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
A2
1st quarter March
Last view of Moon
Rock
320° 321°
3.5°
322°
+29° 27’.5
3°
Ballymeanach (Duncragaig)
Δ
![Page 26: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Site
Declination found
Value used for Δ (a) ± 9’ (b) ± 8’.6/10’
Differences – from:-(a) ± 9’ (b) ± 8’.6/10’
Onich (1)
-28º 38’.6
-28º 38’.5 -28º 37’.5
-0’.1 -1’.1
Achara(2)
+29º 08’.4
+29º 09’.5 +29º 08’.5
-1’.1 -0’.1
Salachary(14)
-28º 38’.9
-28º 38’.5 -28º 37’.5
-0’.4 -1’.4
Salachary(14)
-29º 27’.7
-29º 27’.5 -29º 27’.1
-0’.2 -0’.6
Ford (16)
+28º 56’.3
+28º 56’.5 +28º 56’.1
-0’.2 +0’.2
Carnasserie(19)
Approx.(-29º 28’.5)
-29º 27’.5 -29º 27’.1
(-1’.0) (-1’.4)
Nether Largie (20)
+28º 56’.2
+28º 56’.5 +28º 56’.1
-0’.3 +0’.1
Ballymeanach (21)
+29º 27’.6
+29º 27’.5 +29º 27’.1
+0’.1 +0’.5
Torbhlaran(24)
+28º 55’.9 &(& +28º 56’.3)
+28º 56’.5 +28º 56’.1
-0’.6 -0’.2
Achnabreac(29)
Approx. (-28º 38’ )
-28º 38’.5 -28º 37’.5
(-0’.5) (+0’.5)
Barnashaig(32)
+29º 28’.8
+29º 27’.5 +29º 27’.1
+1’.3 +1’.7
‘Lower Fernoch’ (34)
-28º 37’.7
-28º 38’.5 -28º 37’.5
+0’.8 -0’.2
Declination Values Found
RMS 0’.68 0’.80
![Page 27: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Theodolite Measurements ( Δ ± 9’ )
![Page 28: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Alignments found at Major Standstill with ±Δ
Ballymeanach (21), Barnashaig (32) (Quarters) Onich (1), Salachary (14), Achnabreac (29), ‘Lower Fernoch’ (34) (Full Moon)
Achara (2) (Full Moon)
Ford (16), NetherLargie (20. Torbhlaran (24) (Quarters)
(Salachary (14)), Carnasserie (19) ( Quarters)
±
![Page 29: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Evidence that the results found were planned
● For 9 of the 13 alignments the foresight is a stone or is rocky
/Continued
● There are several ‘pairs’ of stones with opposite ‘wobble’(9’ Delta, Δ)
e.g. Onich / Achara Carnasserie / Achnabreac Barnashaig / Lower Fernoch
● All 13 of the stones with an indicated lunar band give a precise alignment for one of the 4 key declinations
![Page 32: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Also :- Foresights chosen to avoid uncertainty
South SSW
(There are no other distant skylines)
Rocky Ridge
Salachary
![Page 33: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Chance Alignments
● I tested this by examining a total of 1500 degrees of random hilly horizon
● This contained 30 lunar bands (and so potentially 30 alignments)
● Three chance alignments were found Therefore:- About 1 in 10 random Lunar Bands contained an alignment So they are not common
![Page 34: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Implications:-
13 Stones 13 precise lunar alignments
Random Lunar Band About 1 in 10 chance
Using what I have found, One random lunar band the probability of a precise alignment is about 1 in 10 Two random lunar bands BOTH yielding a precise alignment is about 1 in 100Three “ “ “ ALL “ “ “ “ “ 1 in 1000Thirteen “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ !!!!!!!!!
The results prove that in the Early Bronze Age precise lunar alignments were set up in this region
![Page 35: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Earlier I had a slide regarding precise lunar alignments:-
● Are they common?
● Are they chance or were they planned?
● The evidence shows that they are common and were planned
![Page 36: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The debate needs to move on from finding reasons that it could not have been done to working out just how it was done and the implications for the type of society at the time
These results cannot be side-lined as an inconvenience
![Page 37: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
“It would require about 100 years to set up each site”
My suggestion is that by using a star rising or setting close to a known alignment it would be simple to ‘copy’ the declination from a known site to a potential new site
● Not limited by the 18.6 year lunar cycle
● Change of latitude makes only a small difference
● Fine tune at the next ‘Standstill’
Using this method a small team of trained observers could identify many possible sites while awaiting the next 18 year standstill.
![Page 38: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
A Possible Reason
173 Days 173 Days
Eclipses can only occur near the time of the maximum of the ‘wobble’
![Page 39: Document](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062813/568164d9550346895dd72496/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
There is much more information on:-
www.lunarsites-scotland.net
where ALL of the results and full analysis and discussion can be found