WORLDWIDE COMPETITION IN LAUNCH SERVICES€¦ · WORLDWIDE COMPETITION IN LAUNCH SERVICES. ......
Transcript of WORLDWIDE COMPETITION IN LAUNCH SERVICES€¦ · WORLDWIDE COMPETITION IN LAUNCH SERVICES. ......
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
WORLDWIDE COMPETITION IN
LAUNCH SERVICES
Colloque international - Les lanceurs européens 3 November 2015
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use 2
Intensive progress made through technology -
Beginnings are special
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Progressive evolution from space race
• Domestic strategic demand and national pride
• Commercial uses and communication satellites
• Competition for commercial payloads as from late 70s
• Launch service agreement Arianespace/Intelsat
3
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Commercial launch services Europe - United States
• Stop of US ELV production lines
• Exclusive US commercialisation through Space Shuttle
• China, Russia, Ukraine - bilateral US agreements
• Regulation of prices and quotas
• International joint ventures
4
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Commercial launch service Europe - Russia
• Abandonment of Russian launch quotas in 2000
• Competition increase
• Demand contraction
• US withdrawal from market
• Ariane - Proton
• Converted Soviet era ICBMs
5
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Commercial launch service Current situation - GTO
• Proton failures
• Falcon 9 - Ariane 5
• LMCLS and MHI
• ITAR - Chinese turnkey solutions
• India - domestic demand
• New strategies for payload insertion
• Electric propulsion satellites
6
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Commercial launch service Current situation - NGTO
• Almost 90% captive
• Vega
• Russia - Converted Russian ICBMs phase-out /suspended - Soyuz, Angara
• India - PSLV
• China - Long March 2
• US and Japan - Domestic - Delta II, Minotaur, Pegasus, Antares, Epsilon
7
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Market and competition
Market: extent of demand in which buyers and sellers come together and forces of supply and
demand affect prices
Competition: effort of 2 or more parties acting independently to secure the business of a 3rd party
by offering the most favorable terms
9
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Relevant market - commercial
• No free competition
• Substantial government backing
• Captivity of national institutional payloads to domestic launch services
• Distinction between Government and commercial applications
• Commercial market characterisation: Size, Orbit and Worldwide basis
10
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use 11
LEO
Projects can be financed by one
country
Mainly captive institutional customers
Limited competition
Cooperation for
initial launch capability
development
LEO GTO/GEO Exploration
Distance from Earth
Competition
Cooperation
GEO/GTO
Highly competitive environment
Projects can be financed by one
country
Both institutional and commercial needs Also serving mega-
constellations ISS access / Exploration
Projects can no
longer be financed by a single party
Need for
cooperative efforts
Cooperation and competition
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Headwinds for European launch services
• Political, economic and industrial motivation for independent access to space
• All non-European institutional demand captive to domestic sources - almost 70% of worldwide demand
• Solid base - launch rate - to access commercial market in addition
• Small European institutional demand - increase EU Galileo and Copernicus
• Europe is highly dependent on the commercial market to ensure affordability
• International environment quickly evolving and worldwide competition increasing
12
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Hardening of the competition
13
Increased number of new LV
New approaches in launch service business
Efforts to reduce costs
Efforts to capture commercial payloads
Positive effects of currency fluctuations
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Evolving launch service offer
14
Commoditisation
Innovative approaches in development and production (e.g. USA)
Flexibility through vehicle modularity
New injection orbits
Package deals (e.g. Russia, China)
Extension of payload capacity (very heavy and very small vehicles)
Multiple launch sites targeting specific customers, allowing launch rate increase
Reduction of turn-around-times
Environmental considerations
DEMAND AND EVOLVING NEEDS
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Outlook competitive landscape
• Increased price pressures
• Cost reductions increasingly a driver
• Potential offer overcapacity
• Stable GTO satellite demand - mega-constellations?
15
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
GTO outlook
• New generations of mostly modular launch vehicles
• US competition for domestic launch services - ULA towards commercial market - Atlas and Vulcan
• ITAR restrictions limiting Chinese impact
• Domestic demand limiting GSLV or H-II/-III availability
• Stable institutional demand and in some cases low production cost
16
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Competitive Environment - GTO
17
Launch services contracts dominated by
Arianespace and SpaceX
Limited presence
Proton RUR exchange rate allowing slow comeback
Atlas V 1 contract signed each 2013 and 2015
Commercially inactive
Zenit suspended
Delta IV no commercial activity
H-II no contracts since 2013
Long March 3 ITAR restrictions
GSLV Mk II low performance
Current situation
Potential overcapacity, increased willingness to
compete on the commercial market
Developments in all major countries
Ariane 6 2020
Angara 5 in test phase (9 flights left)
Falcon Heavy 2016 (already signing)
Vulcan 2019
H-III 2021
Long March 5/7 2016
GSLV Mk III 2016 (suborbital test flight 2014)
Outlook
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
NGTO outlook
• Institutional orientation
• Increasing commercial applications and renewed prospects of constellations
• Modular family - Angara 1.2, Long March 6
• Use of common elements - Athena, Epsilon
• LEO launchers developments to acquire space access capability mostly for very small domestic payloads
• Very heavy lift launch vehicles for future exploration – US, China
18
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Competitive Environment - NGTO
19
Current situation
Predominantly captive institutional demand
Not relying on commercial launches
Commercial activity:
Russia (Dnepr, Rockot): phase-out / suspended
Europe (Vega)
India (PSLV): 1 launch p.a. + piggyback
Reduced commercial activity:
China (Long March 2)
USA (Delta II, Minotaur, M-C, Pegasus, Antares)
Japan (Epsilon)
Outlook
Growing commercial applications, constellations
may change commercial stance of some LSP
Modular LV families could respond to demand increase
Russia Soyuz 2.1v, Angara 1.2
Europe Vega
India PSLV
China Long March 6/7
USA Minotaur/-C, Antares, Falcon 9
Japan Epsilon phase 2
Others Israel, Brazil, Iran, Argentina, Korea
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
Reusability
• Demonstration of technical feasibility and commercial viability
• Potential for cost reduction - overall economics and demand increase
• SpaceX - Grasshopper
• ULA - Vulcan
• Europe - LEE
20
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use
“No one can predict the future exactly but we know two things: it’s going to be different, and it must be
rooted in today’s world” - Peter Thiel
22