WorldConnect 2012 Day 2 session 5 Working together - PARIS CDG Frank Goldnadel
-
Upload
apg-network -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
description
Transcript of WorldConnect 2012 Day 2 session 5 Working together - PARIS CDG Frank Goldnadel
Working together for the Benefit of the Clients
Frank GOLDNADEL
MODERATOR: Pierre JEANNIOT
Managing Director
PARIS CDG
Partnership between
Service providers of the Air Transportation
APG World Connect Forum 2012
2 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
Franck Goldnadel
Managing Director
Paris-CDG Airport
Partnership and colloborative action plansThe Airport Authority can not be alone :
• Services and process are in a value chain
• Every airport partners are in the value chain
• Success is shared or is not
Objectives
• To reinforce operational coordination between diffe rent partners
• To improve anticipation of operational situations
3 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
• To improve anticipation of operational situations
• To improve the airport capacities, quality of servi ce and value
• To earn money because of efficiency
3 main examples
• The A-CDM already deployed at Paris-CDG Airport
• Partnership between Airlines/Airport authorities an d Police Boarder Controls
• Common Crisis Management
A- CDM - Collaborative Decision Making
European Programme managed by Eurocontrol, supporte d by the European Commission :
• Better integration of airports within the European aeronautical network
• Optimization of airport operation under both norma l and degraded conditions
Objectives
• To reinforce operational coordination between diffe rent partners (Airlines/Airport/ATC)
4 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
• To improve anticipation of operational situations
• To optimize the airport capacity for the benefit of airlines
• To limit impacts on the environment
Deployment of Airport - CDM within Europe
• A-CDM already deployed at Paris-CDG
• Future deployment planned at : Paris-Orly, Amsterda m, …
A-CDM CDM@CDG in Brief
Partners involved Achievements to date
• Sharing of useful information via a dedicated WEB s ite
• Daily exchanges regarding operational issues (audio
conferences)
• Shared management of degraded situations and, if
required, the activation of the CDM Crisis Centre
• Set-up/deployment of local management of Departures
• Monthly analysis of performance
5 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
• Monthly analysis of performance
Benefits
• -10% in taxi times (15,9 min in 2011 as compared t o 17,4 in 2010)
� Fuel savings : 4 000 T / yr
� Reduction in CO2 emissions : 12 000 T / yr
� Reduction in holding times at runway thresholds: up to 37%
• +10% Slot times respected
• 90 % Adaptation of the European network to integrat e local
constraints
• Overall improved management of degraded situations
A- CDM and Perspectives
Optimization of Departure Routes by means of :• Taking into account Airline priorities
• Optimization of traffic allocation to each set of d ouble runways
• Taking into account de-icing capabilities• Optimization of flight programmes
Consolidation of management under degraded conditio ns• Development of simulation tools including the funct ion « What if » scenarios
6 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
• Development of simulation tools including the funct ion « What if » scenarios• Migration from « CDM Crisis Centre » to « Terminal Air port Management »
Pursuing the Single European Sky integration proces s• Participation in the construction of the process to standardize European A-CDM • Development of closer ties with the Operational Man ager for the European
Network• Active participation within the SESR Programme
Partnership - Experimentation for long term change : « SMART CDG »
S.M.AR.T.Savoir Mutualiser nos Actions pour Réussir à Trois
SMART’s Primary Objective :To improve our passengers ’ global experience within the border control
A collaborative approach to changing ways of working amongst key partners in the passenger process
Airlines
7 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
To improve our passengers ’ global experience within the border control zones
Prior to ���� During ���� After controls
Secondary objectives :� Globally improve process times with smoother passage thr ough
controls� Optimize Border Police facilities & processes� Provide a welcoming ambiance and globally enjoyable exp erience
� A « bottom up » approach to problem solving and improving methods of working amongst actors from different structures and professional sectors
Phase 1Fixing Guidelines
(6-9 weeks)
Phase 2Experimentation
(9 Weeks)
Phase 3Modelization(5-6 weeks)
Phase 4Global Deployment
(6-12 months)
The main principles of Experimentation : Four distinct phases
Partnership - Experimentation for long term change : « SMART CDG »
8 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
� A platform offered to operational staff (from both internal & external sources) to exchange freely, identify daily problems, express their ideas and propose & test concrete solutions in an iterative process over 9 weeks
MesureMesure ActionAction
1
23
Concep-tion
Concep-tion
MesureMesure ActionAction
1
23
Concep-tion
Concep-tion
9 Experiments conducted to dateOver 450 staff directly involved in the process of which
25% representing external partners
4 Experiments co -piloted hand in hand with State
Spontaneity, Creativity & Reactivity within a tight tim eframe :
all with the operational staff in command !
Partnership - Experimentation for long term change : « SMART CDG »
9 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
Recognized benefits :
� Marked improvements in the transverse cooperation amongst both internal/external partners.� A multitude of ideas proposed, concrete actions identified & applied, their efficiency &
effectiveness tested.
� A true evolution in ways of working together.
… all of which contribute to satisfying and surpassing not only passengers/client expectations but also those of airlines & partners
4 Experiments co -piloted hand in hand with State Border Police under the label « SMART ».
Assess the situation in connection with:
- the airside supervision team linked with the Collaborative
Decisin Making (CDM)
- the landside supervision teams (terminals) linked with:
* the airlines and their assistants
Paris-CDG Crisis Management Center, called « PC CDG »
10 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
* the airlines and their assistants
* the States representatives (Préfecture, Civil Aviation Authority,
Police, Customs)
- Other partners (Tour operators, BAR, …) to share information
After assessement of the situation, the PC CDG, coordinates thefollowing actions:
- to inform the passengers within the terminals and through the media(Website, call center, email, twitt, press release, etc.)
- to offer catering services
Paris-CDG Crisis Management Center, called « PC CDG »
11 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
- to offer catering services
- to organise accomodation , if necessary
- to coordinate with the State’s departments, additional measures- Means of transpor t (rail and route)- Safety
All TerminalsAll Terminals
CDM AirsideCDM Airside
Aéroports de Paris Headquarters
Aéroports de Paris Headquarters
PrefecturePrefecture
TerminalsTerminals
AOCAOCTour
OperatorsTour
Operators
PolicePolice
CustomsCustoms
Paris-CDG Crisis Management Center, called « PC CDG »
12 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012
Central Paris-CDGCrisis Management Center
« PC CDG »
Central Paris-CDGCrisis Management Center
« PC CDG »Parkings & RoutesParkings & Routes
BARBAR
CDM AirsideCollaborative Decision Making
CDM AirsideCollaborative Decision Making
Terminals2A-2B-2C-2D
Terminals2A-2B-2C-2D
Air France KLM
Air France KLM
September 2011 – a one day crisis exercice to assess:- the coordination between all the crisis management centers dedicated to handle
crisis at Paris-CDG airport and the States departments
- the transmission of information to passengers and partners- Participation of the representatives of airlines (AOC) and tour operators (CETO)
Paris-CDG Crisis Management Center, called « PC CDG »
13 - Paris CDG Airport – October 2012