WORLD WAR III- How and Why the Swiss CIA Will Trigger Nuclear War Between US-Led NATO & Russia.pdf

19
WORLD WAR III: How and Why the Swiss CIA Will Trigger Nuclear War Between US-Led NATO & Russia Posted: June 29, 2015 in Alaska Terror, Breaking News, NATO Terror, Nuclear Terror, Russian Terror, Terror Alerts, Ukraine Terror, World War III Download & Forward PDF AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, am currently in the process of applying for political asylum inSwitzerland (which is coincidentally home to the CIA), the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, consider this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat were it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland. ISIS ENDGAME: How and Why the CIA in Switzerland Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA David Chase Taylor June 29, 2015 Truther.org SWITZERLAND, Zurich Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological terror attacks, the Swiss CIA has been grooming Russia for nuclear and biological attacks that will predictably lead to World War III. Since the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor in his shocking new book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014), the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III. In other words, the Swiss CIA is desperately trying to trigger a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia so that information about Switzerland‟s secret role as the progenitor of assassinations, terror attacks and wars will be lost in the aftermath of World War III.

Transcript of WORLD WAR III- How and Why the Swiss CIA Will Trigger Nuclear War Between US-Led NATO & Russia.pdf

  • WORLD WAR III: How and Why the Swiss CIA Will Trigger Nuclear

    War Between US-Led NATO & Russia Posted: June 29, 2015 in Alaska Terror, Breaking News, NATO Terror, Nuclear Terror, Russian Terror, Terror Alerts, Ukraine Terror, World War III

    Download & Forward PDF

    AUTHORS NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, am currently in the process of applying for political asylum inSwitzerland (which is

    coincidentally home to the CIA), the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called natural disasters I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss

    CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not

    want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in

    Switzerland, consider this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland

    was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat were it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the

    first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

    ISIS ENDGAME: How and Why the CIA in Switzerland Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

    RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

    David Chase Taylor

    June 29, 2015

    Truther.org

    SWITZERLAND, Zurich Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological

    terror attacks, the Swiss CIA has been grooming Russia for nuclear and biological attacks that will predictably lead to World War III.

    Since the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase

    Taylor in his shocking new book Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now (2014), the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III.

    In other words, the Swiss CIA is desperately trying to trigger a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia so that information about Switzerlands

    secret role as the progenitor of assassinations, terror attacks and wars will be lost in the aftermath of World War III.

  • Consequently, the Swiss CIA is now in a race against time to destroy the world as we know with U.S. and Russian nuclear attacks in a last-ditch

    effort to cover-up the news that the CIA is located in Switzerland, the eye of the stormwhich has been free of terror attacks and war for over 500-

    years.

    It is imperative to note that NATO, Russia, and the United States are under the command and control of the CIA in Switzerland, all of which are

    indirectly funded by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

    Although Switzerland is publically calling for a nuclear-free world, they are secretly setting up the United States and Russia for World War III that

    will likely be sparked by a false-flag attack or invasion in Alaska, Poland, Sweden and/or Ukraine. In the event that World War III commences

    Switzerland is ultimately responsible.

    World War III Propaganda

    Prior to World War III between the U.S. and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent

    headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, U.S. versus Russia propaganda is now at

    an all-time high which suggests that a false-flag attack that triggers a nuclear World War III is imminent. This particular narrative was first identified

    by Truther.org back on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea, causing the Russian defense minister to

    state that the incident pose[d] a danger to strategic stability between the two countries. Roughly a week later on June 8, 2015, Russia Today

    published a report entitled Russia has Better Things To Do than Start WW3, raising the notion of World War III involving Russia. Three days later

    on June 11, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations visited Ukraine, slamming Russian aggression. The timely

    comment foreshadows a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, one which may be nuclear in nature. Five days later on June 16, 2015, Russia herself

    warned of a new military confrontation in Europe, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia will be at war in Europe in the near future. A

    day later on June 17, 2015, CNN published a report entitled U.S.-Russia Military Tit for Tat Raises Fears of Greater Conflict, suggesting that a

    local U.S.-Russian conflict could translate into World War III. Lastly, on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled NATO

    Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive arms buildup on Russias border will in fact lead to World War III between the

  • U.S. and Russia.

    Close Calls

    Aside from the aforementioned World War III rhetoric and propaganda, there have been a number of close calls which have set the scene for a

    military showdown between the United States and Russia. One of these incidents could be misinterpreted (purposely of course) which could translate

    into a hot war between Russia and U.S. and NATO forces. The first close call between the U.S. and Russia was reported on May 31, 2015,

    when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a

    U.S. versus Russia naval conflict in the Black Sea. This notion is confirmed by NATO war games ongoing in the Black Sea. A day later on June 1,

    2015, it was reported that Russian and U.S. planes had a close encounter near Crimea, foreshadowing an aerial-related conflict between the two

    countries. Again, the incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia conflict in Ukraine. Nine days later

    on June 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet reportedly harassed U.S. reconnaissance plane, otherwise known as a spy plane. According to

    reports, the Russian Su-27 fighters reportedly intercepted a US RC-135 intelligence aircraft on May 30, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken

    collectively, suggest that a similar incident will lead to a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia.

    Russian Nuclear Terror Attack

    Exactly one month before the aforementioned book Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now (2014) was published on December 21, 2014, Forbes

    published a report on November 21, 2014, entitled Does Russia Think Their New Nuclear Weapons Could Win A War?. This was the first-ever

    report identified by Truther.org which foreshadowed an unprecedented and unprovoked nuclear strike by Russia. Ever since revelations where made

    public that Switzerland harbors the CIA, the international media (which operates at the behest of the CIA) has been inundated with the Russian

    nuclear attack narrative. For example, it was reported back on March 15, 2015, that Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is preparing to use nuclear

    weapons if necessary. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin again threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and

    defend Crimea in Ukraine. It is imperative to note that the latter two reports invoking Ukraine and a nuclear attack are key because aside from the

    United States, Ukraine is most likely NATO country to suffer a Russian nuclear strike. Roughly a month later on May 1, 2015, it was reported

    that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike.

  • Roughly 4-weeks later on May 27, 2015, a NATO general warned that Russian PresidentPutin is a dangerous gamblerwilling to use nuclear

    weapons, an apparent preview of things to come. The notion of a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia was foreshadowed in a Russia Today

    report from June 7, 2015, entitled UK Could Host US Nukes to Counter Increased Russian Activity, as well as a Telegraph report entitled

    Nuclear Missiles Could be Sited Again on British Soil in New Cold War with Russia. In what appears to be an ominous sign of things to come,

    the Daily Star published a report on June 8, 2015, entitled Armageddon Strikes: Massive Cloud Sparks Russian Nuclear Attack Panic. A day later

    on June 9, 2015, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt was enacted by intelligence operative Mark Dice who created a petition to nuke Russia. Three days

    later on June 11, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled US and Russia Playing Nuclear Chicken with Each Other, confirming, albeit in a

    de facto manner, that nuclear war between the two nations is imminent. A day later on June 12, 2015, it was reported that people in Moscow widely

    oppose the fake petition to nuke America, further raising the specter of nuclear war between the two countries. Four days later on June 16,

    2015, Russian President Putin reportedly stated that Russia will get 40 new intercontinental missiles this year, all of which are nuclear in nature. Four

    days later on June 17, 2015, Kremlin officials stated that Russias nuclear buildup is being forced by the West. Three days later on June 20,

    2015, Putin stated that the world was no closer to Cold War-style nuclear standoff, raising the notion of a nuclear confrontation just prior to its

    fruition in reality. Three days later on June 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled The Pentagon Goes Nuclear on Russia which stated

    that Russian submarines off the coast of America could engage in a nuclear turkey shoot, knocking out every major American city within a few

    minutes. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report

    designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles which travel through space. Lastly, on June 25, 2015,

    Reuters published a report entitled Russia Playing with Fire with Nuclear Saber-Rattling, further inferring that a nuclear conflict between the U.S.

    and Russia is now in play by the CIA.

    Russian Bio-Terror Attack

    Although a Russian-based nuclear attack are the most likely scenario, there is also the chance that the Swiss CIA could spark a biological pandemic

    in Europe during the impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia. How this bio-terror pandemic will manifest is not yet known, but it has been

    foreshadowed in the news nonetheless. For example, on June 5, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled Expert Predicts Anthrax

    Attacks Will Be Used to Push Russian War, consummating the terms Anthrax and Russia within the same headlines. Ten days later on June 15,

    2015, Infowars published another report entitled Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?, stating that the next stage of development of

    Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus. Needless to say, one of these bio-labs in Eastern Europe could be directly attacked

    or suffer collateral damage, leading to a biological outbreak that could spark the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015.

    I. ALL THE WORLD IS A STAGE:

  • 1.1: US & Russia Funded by BIS in Switzerland

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland is the financial backbone of the CIA in Switzerlandwhich secretly funds its black

    operations around the world. In short, the BIS funds 60 central banks which are collectively responsible for 95% of the worlds GDP, making it the

    sole progenitor of the worlds fiat money supply. These central banks include the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States which funds the U.S.

    government and her military, and the Bank of Russia which funds the Russian government and her military. Consequently, all monies allocated to the

    U.S. and Russia for World War III originated from the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which, aside from Vatican City, is the only

    country to bear a sovereign flag. Consequently, the United States and Russia do not have sovereign flags, meaning that they are not in control of their

    own destiny nor their own respective militaries.

  • 1.2: Presidential Puppets Obama & Putin

    Since both U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin are puppets of the CIA, they have no real power and only act when

    told to do so. In other words, neither of them is actually in charge; they are just political puppets posing for the cameras. However, in order to create

    the public perception that the beef between the U.S. and Russia is real, Obama reportedly urged G7 leaders to maintain the sanctions on Russia while

    simultaneously admitting that they dont work. A day later on June 6, 2015, Putin reportedly stated that Russia would attack NATO only in mad

    persons dream. The premediated soundbite was given in order to create the perception that Putin is crazy, especially in the aftermath of unprovoked

    nuclear strikes against the U.S. and NATO. Lastly, it was reported on June 24, 2015, that Putins approval rating is at an historic high at 89%,

    inferring that virtually all of Russia supports his reckless policy. In the aftermath of a nuclear World War III, Putin will be blamed rather that the CIA

    who orchestrated the nuclear conflict to begin with.

    II. PRE-WORLD WAR III PROGRAMMING:

    2.1: World War III Saber Rattling

    Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent

    headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, saber rattling between the NATO nations

    and Russia is currently at an all-time high which suggests that a real world attack between the two nations is imminent. Aside from the fact

    that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska on May 1, 2015, Russia instituted a travel ban against EU officials on May 31, 2015. Less

    than a week later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military training and exercises to counter Russia.

    A day later on June 6, 2015, a government reported stated that the U.S. is now considering a harder stance on Russia, one that will predictably lead to

    war. Two days later on June 7, 2015, U.S. Joint Chiefs of StaffChairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine

  • NATO, suggesting that an armed conflict is only a matter of time. Less than 48-hours later on June 9, 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush called

    for a tougher policy toward Russia and Putin. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015, a top Russian security official reportedly stated that the U.S.

    would like Russia to cease to exist as a country, a declaration of war if there ever was one. Lastly, that same day, June 22, 2015, the Independent

    published a report entitled Russia Aggression': US Nuclear Missile Commander says Vladimir Putins Actions Echo Those of Nazi Germany in the

    1930s, a report evidently designed to invoke a Russian attack and invasion that may be nuclear in nature. Needless to say, these reports, taken

    collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

    2.2: Motives for a Russian Attack

    In order to create the necessary narrative in the media prior to unprovoked Russian nuclear strikes against NATO nations, a number of timely motives

    have been created by the Swiss CIA. For example, on May 31, 2015, it was reported that Russian President Putin was shut out from the G7

    Meeting for the second year running. Less than 2-weeks later on June 10, 2015, the United States reportedly overtook Russia as the worlds top oil

    and gas producer. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed NATO plans to

    annex Russias Kaliningrad. Roughly a week later on June 19, 2015, the EU Parliament voted to prolong economic sanctions against Crimea till

    June 2016. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, have given Russia at least 4 motives for an attack against NATO, one which may be

    nuclear in nature.

    2.3: Russian Threats

    Prior to a World War III between the U.S. and Russia, a number of threats must be leveled from both sides in order to give the perception that the

    conflict is real and not being orchestrated by the CIA in Switzerland. The first threat was identified on May 8, 2015, when it was reported that Russia

    intends to restore a spy base in Cuba, some 90 miles from American shores. That same day, May 8, 2015, Russian students projected a Russian-based

    tank attack on the White House, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to foreshadow a Russian attack on America. Roughly a month later on June

    16, 2015, it was reported that Russia will retaliate if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep. Since NATO is currently moving

    military equipment to its border with Russia, a Russian attack is forthcoming. Three days later on June 19, 2015, Russian President Putin stated that

    no one should talk to Russia through ultimatums, inferring that he will no longer be subjugated by the West. That same day, June 19, 2015, Russia

    warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO, an off-handed threat to Ukraine which did in fact join NATO. Lastly, on June 23,

    2015, a senior Russian diplomat stated that Russia will longer accept lectures from the United States. The timely comments were designed to show

    that Russia feels belittled by NATO and may lash out, possibly with nuclear strikes. Needless to say, these threats, taken collectively, suggest that an

    armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

    III. WORLD WAR III ARMS BUILDUP:

  • 3.1: Russian Military Buildup

    Prior to the start of World War III, Russia must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular

    narrative was first identified back on June 15, 2015, when it was reported that Russia may beef up its border if U.S. military arms are stationed in

    Eastern Europe. Since U.S. arms are now flowing into NATO countries such as Poland, it can be assumed that Russia has made good on its promise.

    A day later on June 16, 2015, it wasRussian President Putin stated that Russia will get 40 new nuclear intercontinental missiles this year, an ominous

    sign that nuclear war is imminent. Less than 24-hours later on June 17, 2015, it was reported that the Russian military is developing an anti-drone

    microwave gun. The timely propaganda report was designed to associate an aerial aircraft (drone) with radiation (microwave) just prior to nuclear

    airstrikes by Russia, most likely in America and/or Eastern Europe. Lastly, that same day, June 17, 2015, Russia showed off its news military

    equipment and vehicles at Army 2015 Expo near Moscow, a flexing of the Russian military muscle if you will. Needless to say, these reports, taken

    collectively, suggest that a conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

  • 3.2: US & NATO Military Buildup

    Prior to the start of World War III, NATO must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular

    narrative was first identified back on June 4, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S, may deploy missiles in Europe to counter Russia. Ten days

    later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now in talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe. That same day, June 14, 2015,

    it was reported that Poland and Lithuania discussing plans with the U.S. to harbor military equipment. Said talks became reality a day later on June

    15, 2015, when the Pentagon reportedly sent heavy military equipment to Eastern Europe. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that the U.S.

    Air Force may send F-22s to Europe over the threat from Russia. The massive military escalation in Eastern Europe was confirmed on June 18,

    2015, when it was reported that NATO is conducting the biggest beef up of defenses since the Cold War. That same day, June 18, 2015, it was also

    reported that the Pentagon is now building a cruise missile shield to defend U.S. cities from Russia, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that U.S.

    cities will be attacked by Russian missiles, most likely nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report

    entitled NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive NATO arms buildup on Russias border will in fact lead to

    World War III. The ongoing NATO buildup of weapons was confirmed yet again on June 5, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that

    the U.S must boost military aid to NATO to counter Russia. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015: Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide

    weapons, aircraft and commandos to NATO. A day later on June 23, 2015, it was reported that thePentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War

    Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles. That same day, June 23,

    2015, it was reported that the U.S. military is now moving tanks and other equipment to allied nations near the Russian border, including but not

    limited to: 250 military vehicles and Abrams tanks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO

    and Russia is imminent.

    3.3: Black Sea Naval Buildup

    In order to create the scene for a spectacular World War III battle between the U.S. and Russia, both sides must get their aircraft and ships in position

  • prior an attack. Aside from the USS Taylor (FFG-50) and the USS Mount Whitney(LCC-20) which were originally stationed in the Black Sea during

    the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the U.S. has also sent the USS Truxtun to the Black Sea which is part of the USS George H.W.

    Bush strike group stationed in Mediterranean. On the Russian side, there are a total of 7 ships in the Black Sea. According to a March 5, 2014

    report,two Russian warships have now entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus en route to Crimea. The 150 Saratov landing ship and the 156

    Yamal assault ship will reportedly join five other Russian naval ships which are currently stationed in the port city of Sevastopol which is adjacent

    to Crimea. These ships include the 30th Surface Ship Division, the 41st Missile Boat Brigade, the 247th Separate Submarine Division, the 68th

    Harbor Defense Ship, and the 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division. In total, there are at least 11 ships in or near the Black Sea.

    IV. WORLD WAR III WAR GAMES:

    4.1: Russian War Games

    Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the Russian military must get their soldiers and equipment ready for battle. War games are in

    essence practice for war and they have been occurring at an alarming rate. The notion that Russia is actively training for an attack on NATO was first

    identified back on March 7, 2014, when the Pentagon confirmed that Russian is now conducting air defense drills that will conclude with live fire

    exercise. Two days later on March 9, 2015, it was reported that Russian jets are practicing attack scenarios on NATO ships, further foreshadowing

    a Russian-based attack, possibly nuclear in nature. Roughly a month later on April 30, 2015, it was reported that Russia and China will hold their

    first-ever joint naval drills in the Mediterranean in May 2015. Lastly, on May 25, 2015, it was reported that Russia launched a massive air force

  • exercise with 250 aircraft, further foreshadowing the notion of a Russian-based aerial attack. Considering that war games have a tendency to go live,

    an armed conflict between NATO and Russia could commence at any time.

    4.2: US & NATO War Games

    Prior to World War III between the United States and Russia, the U.S. and NATO must get their soldiers and equipment ready for battle. War games

    are in essence practice for war and they have been occurring at an alarming rate. The notion that the U.S. and NATO are actively training for an

    attack on Russia was first identified back on March 9, 2015, when it was revealed that 3,000 U.S, troops are headed to Eastern Europe for military

    exercises. Roughly 3-months later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S. must boost military exercises in Europe to

    counter Russia. Participating members in the following 7 NATO war games include but are not limited to: Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Latvia,

    Lithuania, NATO, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Considering that war games have a tendency

    to go live, an armed conflict between NATO and Russia could commence at any time.

    A. Locked Shields 2015

    The NATO war game Locked Shields 2015 was executed on April 20-25, 2015. The drills reportedly involved 400 people from 16 countries.

    Based on the plethora of Russian-based cyber-attacks, the drills appears to be preparation for a far deadlier cyber-attack that will predictably be

    scapegoated onto Russia

    B. Siil-2015 aka Hedgehog

    The NATO war game Siil-2015 or Hedgehog was the largest-ever military drills in Estonia which concluded on May 15, 2015. The drill

    reportedly involved 13,000 military forces from Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, NATO, the Netherlands, Poland, the United

    Kingdom, and the United States.

  • C. Zaibo Kirtis aka Lightning Strike

    The NATO war game Lightning Strike or Zaibo Kirtis, which reportedly involved over 3,000 troops, was largest drills ever executed by

    Lithuanian Army. The drill focused on joint action by the army and civilian authorities against so-called hybrid threats combining both military and

    non-military methods of fighting.

    D. Dynamic Mongoose

    The NATO war game Dynamic Mongoose is an annual NATO anti-submarine exercise involving Norway, Germany, Sweden and the United

    States. About 5,000 servicemen from 10 NATO countries took part in the drills that employs the use of sub hunts, surface vessels, aircraft and a

    variety of radar and sonar technologies.

    E. Nobel Jump 2

    The NATO war game Nobel Jump 2 concluded on June 19, 2015, in Poland. The drills featured some 2,100 soldiers from nine NATO states,

    including soldiers from the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF) which was created at the 2014 NATO Summit in response to a

    perceived threat from Russia. The Noble Jump exercise was first time that high-readiness units are being deployed under the new VJTF framework.

    F. Allied Shield

    The NATO war game Allied Shield concluded on June 20, 2015. The drills reportedly involved some 15,000 troops from 19 allied states and three

    partner nations.

    G. BALTOPS

    The NATO war game BALTOPS concluded on June 20, 2015. The drills, which reportedly involved some 50 vessels from 17 countries and 5,600

    troops, featured anti-submarine warfare, air defense, interception of suspect vessels and amphibious landings.

    H. Northern Edge 2015

    The U.S. military war game Northern Edge 2015 was executed in June of 2015. The drills, which reportedly involved more than 200

    aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military, featured naval exercises in the Gulf of Alaska, as well as the deployment of

    ground troops.

    V: WHEN RUSSIA ATTACKS:

  • 5.1: Russian Attacks

    In order to set the precedent for an unprecedented nuclear attack by Russia, a narrative has been created in the media by the Swiss CIA that Russia is

    responsible for a wave of cyber-attacks against the United States, setting the precedent for a far greater attack. This particular narrative was first

    identified back on January 18, 2014, when it was reported thatRussia created the BlackPOS Malware to hack Target and Neiman Marcus. Roughly

    3-months later on April 8, 2015, it was reported that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was

    revealed thatRussians hacked the Pentagons network. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obamas

    unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks. Less than 2-week

    later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. The notion of a Russia-

    based attack was foreshadowed by Russian President Putin on June 6, 2015, when he stated that Russia would attack NATO only in mad persons

    dream. Lastly, on June 9, 2015, it was reported that the television station TV5 Monde was attack by Russia-based hackers. In the event that Russia

    launches nuclear strikes against NATO, the worlds TV stations will likely be simultaneously hijacked by a cyber-attack so that the world will

    collectively witness the nuclear detonation on live on TV.

    5.2: Russia Terror Attacks

    In the last 2-years, at least 5 terror-related incidents (see below) have either been committed by Russian terrorists and/or the Russia government.

    Whether or not these Russian-based terror attacks will commence with a Russian terror attacks against NATO countries is not known, but its highly

    likely. Said attacks will likely transpire a few days prior to a full-scale nuclear attack by Russia. The notion that terror attacks are now in play for

    NATO was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, on June 22, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide

  • commandos to NATO. Translation: Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) will be used to commit terror attacks in NATO countries (e.g.,

    Lithuania, Poland, etc.). This notion that Russian-based terrorism is imminent was confirmed on June 5, 2015, when it was reported that a 19-year

    old Russian girl was an ISIS recruit. The girl was reportedly one 13 Russians who were on their way to join ISIS in Syria. Roughly 2-weeks later on

    June 17, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled Pentagon Trained ISIS Unleashed on Russia, associating Russia with ISIS just prior

    to state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in NATO countries. That same day, June 17, 2015, Moscow reportedly launches an anti-ISIS training

    program for Russian imams, further associating Russia with ISIS just prior to Islamic terror attacks against NATO. Once a war between the U.S. and

    a Russia commences, its highly likely that the creation and funding of ISIS will be blamed on Russia, instead of the CIA in Switzerland where it

    belongs.

    Russian Terror Timeline:

    1. April 15, 2013: Russian Brothers Tsarnaev Execute Boston Marathon Bombings (Boston, MA)

    2. December 29, 2013: 14 Dead after Suicide Bombing at Russia Railway Station (Volgograd, Russia)

    3. December 30, 2014: Second Suicide Bomber hits Russian City, 14 Killed (Volgograd, Russia)

    4. January 25, 2014: Russian Teen Charged in US with Weapon of Mass Destruction (Altoona, PA)

    VI. ORLD WAR III FLASHPOINTS:

    6.1: Global Flashpoints

    Whenever blood must be spilled by the CIA, disputed areas like Crimea (Eastern Europe), Jerusalem (Middle East),Kashmir (Central Asia) or

    the Senkaku Islands (Asia) are suddenly inflamed by the CIA through the television channels which they control outright. Consequently, politicians,

    soldiers and militaries equipment are moved like pawns in the global scheme run by the Swiss CIA. In respect to the impending World War III

    scenario between the U.S. and Russia,Truther.org has identified 4 flashpoints that may suffer an attack, invasion or nuclear strike.

  • 6.2: Alaska

    Since Alaska borders Russia to the East, it is the most likely region of the United States to suffer a direct attack or invasion. This particular notion

    was foreshadowed back on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de

    facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike, possibly on Alaska. The U.S. war game Northern Edge 2015 was also executed in

    Alaska in June of 2015. The drills reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military.

    6.3: Poland

    The notion that NATO and Russia are about to go to war was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, whenU.S. Joint Chiefs of

    Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO. Three days later on June 10, 2015, NATO started

    very high readiness war games in Poland, providing a timely motive for a Russian-based attack. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was

    reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed NATO plans to annex Russias Kaliningrad. The CIA-spawned hoax was a publicity

    stunt designed to provide another timely motive for a Russian-based attack on NATO. Three days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S.

    and Poland are now win talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe, posing a direct threat to Russia. The notion of Russian tanks rolling into Poland

    was ominously foreshadowed on June 14, 2015, when the Sunday Times published a report entitled German Tanks Roll Back into Poland. Similar

    to the invasion of Crimea, the impending invasion of Poland will be used to sell the notion of a new Cold War between Russia and the West. In order

    to provide another blatant motive for a Russian attack on Poland, it was reported on June 14, 2015, that Poland has erected observation towers on its

    border with Russia. The red-and-white metal radio-tower-like structures are reportedly equipped with cameras, rising up to 164 feet. A day later on

    June 15, 2015, it was confirmed that the U.S. will store heavy weapons in Poland under NATOs new plan, proving yet another motive for a Russian-

    based attack on Poland, Islamic terrorist or otherwise. Lastly, the notion that Russia is planning a retaliatory attack on NATO was all but confirmed

    on June 16, 2015, when it was reported that Russia will retaliate if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep in Poland.

    Consequently, an Islamic and/or Russian based attack is expected.

  • 6.4: Sweden

    Aside from being an active participant in numerous NATO war games, Sweden borders Russia to the West and therefore is the most likely of the

    Western European countries to suffer a direct attack or invasion by Russia. Although a nuclear strike on Sweden is highly unlikely, a bio-terror attack

    is a far more realistic possibility, possibly sparking the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. The notion of a Sweden-based bio-terror attack was

    ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when it was reported that migrant beggars in Sweden were attacked with acid. Roughly 2-weeks later

    on June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO.

    6.5: Ukraine

    Considering that Ukraine, a NATO nation, was already invaded by Russia during the crisis in Crimea, its the most likely country in Europe to suffer

    a Russian attack and secondary invasion. Based on recent news in respect to both Ukraine and nuclear warfare, a nuclear strike in Ukraine now

    appears to be in order. This particular narrative was first identified back on March 15, 2015, when Putin stated that Russia was preparing to use

    nuclear weapons if necessary while simultaneously blaming the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin

    threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Ukraine. Roughly a month later on April 28, 2015, it was reported

    that forest fires were heading for Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine. Roughly a month later on June 5, 2015, Russia Today published a report

    entitled Kiev to Allow Foreign Armed Forces in Ukraine, incl. Potential Carriers of Nukes. These 4 reports, taken collectively, suggest that a

    Russian-based nuclear strike on Ukraine is imminent. The nuclear attack will likely happen just prior to, during, or right after the U.S. led NATO

    invasion of Ukraine. In order to foreshadow further Russian aggression in Ukraine, CNN published a report on June 11, 2015, entitled U.S.

    Ambassador to U.N. Visits Ukraine, Slams Russian Aggression. Four days later on June 15, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled

    Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?, starting that the next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental

    outbreak of a virus. In a clear sign that war in Ukraine is imminent, it was reported on June 18, 2015, that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair will take on

  • an advisory role in Ukraine. Three days later on June 21, 2015, Ukraines Right Sector rejects the Minsk deal, calling for a renewed offensive in

    Ukraine. The notion that war is about to break out in Ukraine was confirmed on June 22, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S. will provide

    weapons for NATO commandos to attack Ukrainian separatists. That same day, June 22, 2015, it was also reported that a member of Kievs top brass

    defects to anti-government forces. Although only conjecture, its highly likely that the traitorous general will lead the opposition to Russia in the

    coming war. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, the Guardian published a report entitled EU Extends Sanctions against Russia as Ukraine Conflict Rumbles

    On. Although the conflict in Ukraine has been dormant for months, it apparently going to get a shot in the arm.

    VII. WORLD WAR III ENDGAME:

    7.1: World War III Endgame

    In the wake of Russian nuclear attacks in Ukraine or elsewhere, a European Union-type of army will likely be formed to counter Russia. This

    particular notion was foreshadowed back on March 8, 2015, it was reported that the current President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude

    Juncker, called for the creation of EU army. Russian nuclear attacks in Eastern Europe will also provide the Swiss government the political capital it

    needs to drastically change their current asylum and immigration laws, likely resulting in the immediate removal of all European Union citizens,

    whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor included. Draconian changes to Swiss asylum and immigration law will predictably result in Taylors

    deportation and subsequent assassination, which is exactly why the CIA in Switzerland is now targeting Europe with Russian nuclear strikes. The

    notion that Switzerland will deport foreigners was foreshadowed by The Local back on June 19, 2015, when they published a report entitled Russian

    Crisis Threatens 40,000 Swiss Jobs. In the United States, nuclear war will lead to martial law as well as the naked dictatorship of one Barack

    Hussein Obama. As dictator, Obama will execute Rex 84, a classified government scenario that features a military dictatorship in order to carry out

    the industrial slaughter of millions of Americans.

    7.2: Nuclear Cold War

    In the wake of Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine or elsewhere, Putin will predictably blame the U.S. and Obama will predictably blame Russia. This

  • will of course escalate tensions between the two nations which will eventually lead to a new nuclear Cold War. A new and improved U.S. versus

    Russia feud is coincidentally the theme of the televisions show entitled The Americans (2013), as well as the new television mini-series entitled

    The Assets (see trailer) which premiered in the U.S. on January 2, 2014.

    About the Author

    David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor lives in

    Zurich, Switzerland where he is currently in the process of applying for political asylum since the release of The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with

    foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011. Taylor recently authored Greenland Theory: Apocalypse

    Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state ofSwitzerland

    which is home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for

    2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror

    Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre,

    the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed Fast and Furious star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to

    expose Alex Jones treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

    READ: In the Event of My Death Prior to July 19, 2015An Open Letter by Journalist David Chase Taylor

    Truther.org Legal Disclaimer

    Truther.orgs stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings

    made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they

    may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is

    immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014

    Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats,

    create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please

    support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

  • Related

    RED ALERT: NATO War Games Cover for Russian Attack on EuropeGermany & Poland Most Likely to be Attacked or

    InvadedIn "Breaking News"

    Obama Plotting Charlie Hebdo-like Terror AttackCNN & New York Times Top TargetsIn "Beheading Terror"

    Swiss CIA Plotting Iranian Nuclear Terror Strikes on July 4, 2015New York City & Washington, DC Most Likely to Suffer

    AttackIn "9/11-Style Terror"

    Comments are closed.

    https://truthernews.wordpress.com/2015/06/29/world-war-iii-how-and-why-the-swiss-cia-will-trigger-nuclear-war-

    between-us-led-nato-russia/