World development report 2004 Making Services Work for Poor People.
-
Upload
trace-goswick -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of World development report 2004 Making Services Work for Poor People.
world development report 2004
Making Services Work for Poor People
Messages
• Services are failing poor people.
• But governments, citizens, and donors can make them work. How?
• By empowering poor people to– Monitor and discipline service providers– Raise their voice in policymaking
• By strengthening incentives for service providers to serve the poor
MDGs—Global aggregates
Eradicate poverty and hunger Universal primary education
Source: www.developmentgoals.org
MDGs—Global aggregates
Source: www.developmentgoals.org
Promote gender equality Reduce child mortality
Outcomes are worse for poor peoplePercent aged 15 to 19 completing each grade or higher
Source: Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey data
Growth is not enoughPercent living on
$1/dayPrimary completion
rate (percent) Under-5 mortality rateTarget 2015 growth
aloneTarget 2015 growth
aloneTarget 2015 growth
aloneEast Asia 14 4 100 100 19 26
Europe and Central Asia
1 1 100 100 15 26
Latin America 8 8 100 95 17 30
Middle East and North Africa
1 1 100 96 25 41
South Asia 22 15 100 99 43 69
Africa 24 35 100 56 59 151
Sources: World Bank 2003a, Devarajan 2002. Notes: Average annual growth rates of GDP per capita assumed are: EAP 5.4; ECA 3.6; LAC 1.8; MENA 1.4; SA 3.8; AFR 1.2. Elasticity assumed between growth and poverty is –1.5; primary completion is 0.62; under-5 mortality is –0.48.
Similar changes in public spending can be associated with vastly different changes in
outcomes
Sources: Spending data from World Development Indicators database. School completion from Bruns, Mingat and Rakatomalala 2003
and vastly different changes in spending can be associated with similar changes in
outcomes.
Sources: Spending data for 1990s from World Development Indicators database. Child mortality data from Unicef 2002. Other data from World Bank staff
Expenditure incidence
Health Education
Source: Filmer 2003b
Nonwage funds not reaching schools: Evidence from PETS (percent)
Country Mean Ghana 2000 49 Peru 2001 30 Papua NG 2001 28 Tanzania 1998 57 Uganda 1995 78 Zambia 2001 (discretion/rule) 76/10
Source: Ye and Canagarajah (2002) for Ghana; World Bank (2004) for PNG; Instituto Apoyo and World Bank (2002) for Peru; Price Waterhouse Coopers (1998) for Tanzania; Reinikka and Svensson 2002 for Uganda; Das et al. (2002) for Zambia.
Ghost workers on payroll (percent)
Country Education Health
Honduras 2000
Papua NG
5
15
8.3
-
Uganda 1993 20 -
Sources: World Bank 2001 &2004; Reinikka 2001
Extent of absence: Global results
Absence rates(percent) in:
Primaryschools
PrimaryHealthCenters
Bangladesh 16 35
Ecuador 14 --
India 25 40
Indonesia 19 40
Papua New Guinea 15 19
Peru 11 23
Uganda 27 37
Zambia 17 --
But services can work• Contracting-in and contracting-out of health
services in Cambodia
• Infant mortality and malnutrition reduced in Ceará, Brazil
• Citywide services in Johannesburg, South Africa reformed
• Cash transfers to households in Mexico increased enrollment, lowered illness cases
• Citizen report cards in Bangalore, India
• Public information campaign to reduce leakage of education funds in Uganda
Poor people Providers
Policymakers
A framework of relationships of accountability
Short and long routes of accountability
The relationship of accountabilityhas five features
Poor people
Policymakers
A framework of relationships of accountability
Providers
Mexico’s PRONASOL, 1989-94
• Large social assistance program (1.2 percent of GDP)
• Water, sanitation, electricity and education construction to poor communities
• Limited poverty impact – Reduced poverty by 3 percent– If better targeted, could have reduced it by
64 percent
PRONASOL expenditures according to party in municipal government
Source: Estevez, Magaloni and Diaz-Cayeros 2002
A framework of relationships of accountability
Providers
Policymakers
Poor people
Policymaker-provider:Contracting NGOs in Cambodia
• Contracting out (CO): NGO can hire and fire, transfer staff, set wages, procure drugs, etc.
• Contracting in (CI): NGO manages district, cannot hire and fire (but can transfer staff), $0.25 per capita budget supplement
• Control/Comparison (CC): Services run by government
12 districts randomly assigned to CC, CI or CO
Utilization of facilities by poor People sick in last month
Source: Bhushan, Keller and Schwartz 2002
A framework of relationships of accountability
Poor people Providers
Policymakers
Schools in Uganda received more of what they were due
Source: Reinikka and Svensson (2001), Reinikka and Svensson (2003a)
Accountability and decentralized service delivery
Poor people Providers
National policymakers
Local policymakers
Degrees of decentralization
Eight sizes fit all?
Eight sizes fit all?
Eight sizes fit all?
Eight sizes fit all?
Eight sizes fit all?
Eight sizes fit all?
Making Services Work for Poor People
http://econ.worldbank.org/wdr/wdr2004
world development report 2004