World Bank Document...CAS Country Assistance Strategy GOI Govemment of Indonesia INPRES Presidential...

Document ofThe World Bank

ReportNo: 18359-IND

PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT

ONA

PROPOSED CREDIT

IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR73.5 MILLION

(US$100 MILLION EQUIVALENT)

TO THE

REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

FOR AN

URBAN POVERTY PROJECT

April 19, 1999

Urban Development Sector UnitIndonesia Country DepartmentEast Asia and Pacific Region

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

i

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

Exchange Rate Designated for Negotiations, October 22, 1998

Currency Unit = Indonesian Rupiah (Rp)Indonesian Rupiah = US$0.0001US$1 = 7,500 Indonesian Rupiah

SDRI = 1.3546 US$ (end March 1999)

FISCAL YEAR OF BORROWERAPRIL 1-MARCH 31

ACRONYMS

ADB Asian Development BankAMDAL Environmental Impact AssessmentANDAL Environmental Impact StatementAPBD Annual district development budgetAPEF Annual Project Expenditures and FinancingAPBN Annual central government development budgetBappenas National Development Planning AgencyBappeda I/II Provincial/district Planning AgencyBANGDA Directorate General for Regional Development, MoHABKKBN National Family Planning BoardBPKP Central Audit BureauBPS National Statistics BureauBRI Bank Rakyat IndonesiaBupati/Walikota District/city headCPEF Cumulative Project Expenditures and FinancingDPUK Kabupaten Department of Public WorksCAS Country Assistance StrategyGOI Govemment of IndonesiaINPRES Presidential Instruction (a central block grant)IMF International Monetary FundKabupaten/kotamadya District/municipalityKDP Kecamatan Development ProjectKecamatan SubdistrictKelurahan/lurah Urban section comprising on average 10 RWs/ head of kelurahanLKMD Village/kelurahan management groupKPKN Local Office of National TreasuryLIL Learning and Innovation LoanMoF Ministry of FinanceMoHA Ministry of Home AffairsMPW Ministry of Public WorksNGO Non-governmental organization (same as LSM)OC Oversight consultantPDM-DKE Crisis related social safety programPHRD Japanese GrantPMD Directorate General of Community Development, MoHAPMU Project Management UnitPimpro/PjOK Project Administrative Manager (pimpinan proyek)RKL/RPL Environmental Management/ Monitoring PlanRW Neighborhood with some 500 Families (rukun warga)SAL Structural Adjustment LoanSPAPB Grants from central to local governmentsSUSENAS National Household Expenditure SurveyUKL/UPL Environmental Management / Monitoring ProceduresVIP Village Infrastructure Project

Vice President: Jean-Michel SeverinoCountry Director: Mark Baird

Sector Manager: Keshav VarnaTask Manager: Frida Johansen

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page ii

INDONESIAURBAN POVERTY PROJECT

CONTENTS

A. Project Development Objective1. Project development objectives and key performance indicators ..............................................2

B. Strategic Context1. Sector-related CAS goal supported by the project ................................................................. 22. Main sector issues and Government strategy ................................................................. 23. Sector issues to be addressed by the project and strategic choices .............................................4

C. Project Description Summary1. Project component ............................................................................S52. Key policy and institutional reforms supported by the project ..................................................63. Institutional and implementation arrangements ................................................................ 64. Benefits and target population ................................................................ 7

D. Project Rationale1. Project alternatives considered and reasons for rejection ...........................................................82. Major related projects financed by the Bank and/or other development agencies .....................83. Lessons learned and reflected in proposed project design .........................................................94. Indications of Borrower commitment and ownership ................................................................95. Value added of Bank support in this project ................................................................ 9

E. Summary Project Analyses1. Economic ................................................................ 92 Financial ............................................................... 103. Technical ............................................................... 104. Institutional ............................................................... 115. Social ............................................................... 11 6. Environmental assessment ............................................................... 117. Participatory approach ............................................................... 11

F. Sustainability and Risks1. Sustainability ............................................................... 122. Critical risks ............................................................... 123. Possible controversial aspects ............................................................... 12

G. Main Credit Conditions1. Effectiveness conditions ............................................................... 132. Other ............................................................... 13

H. Readiness for Implementation ............................................................... 13

I. Compliance with Bank Policies ............................................................... 13

Annexes

iii

Annex 1 Project Design Summary .......................................... 15Key Performance Indicators .......................................... 16

Annex 2 Project Description.17Annex 3 Estimated Project Costs .......................................... 34Annex 4 Economic Analysis (n.a.) .......................................... 34Annex 5 Financial Summary .......................................... 34Annex 6 Procurement, Disbursement and Auditing Arrangements .......................................... 35

Al Project Costs by Procurement Arrangements .......................................... 40A2 Consultant Selection Arrangements ........................................... 40B Thresholds for Procurement Methods and Prior Review ......................................... 41C Allocation of Credit Proceeds .......................................... 41

Annex 7 Project Processing Budget and Schedule .......................................... 42Annex 8 Documents in the Project File .......................................... 43Annex 9 Status of Bank Group Operations in Indonesia ........................................... 44Annex 10 Country at a Glance .......................................... 46Annex 11 Project Implementation Plan .......................................... 47Annex 12 UPP Implementation Agreement Formats .......................................... 51Annex 13 Land Acquisition and Resettlement Guidelines .......................................... 61Annex 14 Environmental Guidelines .......................................... 62

Map No. 29868

INDONESIAURBAN POVERTY PROJECT

Project Appraisal Document

East Asia and Pacific RegionIndonesia Country Department

Date: April 19,1999 Task Manager: Frida JohansenCountry Director: Mark Baird Sector Manager: Keshav VarmaProject ID: ID-PE-55821 Sector: Urban Program Objective Category: Poverty ReductionLending Instrument: SIC Program of Targeted Intervention: [X] Yes [1 No

Project Financing Data [] Loan [x] Credit [] Guarantee [] Other [Specify]

For Credit:

Amount (SDRm): 73.5Proposed terms: [] Multicurrency [] Single currency

Grace period (years): 10 [] Standard Variable [ ] Fixed [] LIBOR-basedYears to maturity: 35

Commitment charge: 0.5%

Financing plan (US$m equivalent):Source Local Foreign TotalGovernment 14.2 14.2IDA 76.2 23.8 100.0IBRD 13.5 2.0 15.5

Total 103.9 25.8 129.7

Borrower: Republic of IndonesiaGuarantor: n.a.Responsible agency(ies): Bappenas

Estimated disbursements (IDA FY/US$M): 2000 2001 2002 2003 1/Annual 36.5 36.5 21.5 5.5

Cumulative 36.5 73.0 94.5 100

1/ for final disbursements after official closing date

For Guarantees: [] Partial credit [] Partial riskn.a.

Project implementation period: FY99-FY03 Expected effectiveness date: 07/08/99 Expected closing date: 6/30/02

OSD PAD Form: July 30, 1997

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 2

A: Project Development Objective

1. Project development objective and key performance indicators (see Annex 1):

Through a bottom up and transparent approach, the project seeks to improve basic infrastructure in poorurban neighborhoods and to promote sustainable income generation for its poor urban residents who are mostlylong term poor, have incomes eroded by high inflation, or lost sources of income in the economic downturn. Also,the project seeks to strengthen the capability of local agencies to assist poor communities.

B: Strategic Context

1. Sector-related Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) goal supported by the project (see Annex 1):

CAS document number: 18963-IND Date of latest CAS (progress report) discussion: March 9, 1999

The latest CAS, dated July 1997, did not foresee a crisis. The July 1998 "Indonesia in Crisis: AMacroeconomic Update", summarizes the Bank recommendations to GOI, and was the basis for a ConsultativeGroup Meeting, for a $1 billion Policy Reform SAL approved July 1998, and for a project portfolio review inAugust 1998 that identified Bank loan partial cancellations totaling $1 billion. The Bank supported the creation ofan NGO structure to channel funds (expected to be mostly bilateral grants) toNGOs and community projects. NewBank loans, mostly to support the balance of payments, are under preparation. A CAS Progress Report was issuedFebruary 16, 1999. Indonesia has again become eligible for an IDA allocation; SDR100 million were approvedMarch 9, 1999, for a "base case" scenario, and less, for a "low case" scenario.

The Bank took some actions to alleviate the domestic economic slump through existing projects. TheVillage Infrastructure Project coverage was doubled to 3,000 villages on Java and Sumatra in 1998/9 (taking overan intended government share) and will assist a further 2,500 villages in 1999/0, a third project year made possiblewith the loan by the rupiah depreciation. The Kecamatan (subdistrict) Development Project, approved in June1998, widens the VIP menu to include economic activities; it started assisting 500 rural kecamatans in 1998/9,double the number at appraisal, and many in Eastern Indonesia, and is to expand to 750 kecamatans in 1999/0.Under road projects some disbursement rates were increased and more funds directed to maintenance. Urbanprojects were amended to provide for labor intensive works with 100% loan financing (implementation started inJune 1998 and ended December 1998). Some education and health projects were restructured to ease affordabilityof services by the poor. New Bank initiatives include 2 basic education projects, that have been negotiated.

This project was proposed early 1998, obtained a $750,000 PHRD grant July 1998 to assist preparation;was negotiated October 1998 for a loan, was then delayed awaiting a Bank decision on the Government request forIDA financing, and when this was approved, supplementary negotiations were held on April 9, 1999 on a creditagreement. The CAS objectives of poverty reduction, decentralization and participatory project identification andimplementation, continue and apply to this project.

2. Main poverty issues and Government strategy:

Even while incomes had been increasing steadily for years, a large proportion of the population remainedjust above the absolute poverty line. The pre-crisis number of "absolute" poor was estimated at 7 million in urbanareas, at a 10% incidence (and 15 million in rural areas, at 12%). Unemployment was estimated to be very low,less than 2%--though substantial underemployment was acknowledged (some 35%). Since the banking collapse inmid-1997, most enterprises cannot obtain or afford credit for working capital. This has led to the vicious circle oflayoffs and loss of purchasing power and of demand by employees/consumers, enterprises and self employedservice providers. The 1997 foreign exchange crisis worsened the problem--except for those who could continue toexport--and fueled inflation to annualized rates exceeding 80%: reduced nominal incomes were reduced even morein real terms. Simultaneously, early 1997 drought was widespread and in places, severe, and affected rurallivelihoods. Unrest exacerbated the situation.

Estimates of the number of people affected by the depression and their location are uncertain as thesituation changes. Mid-1998 urban poverty estimates started at 20%. Of a 91 million labor force, open urban

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD

unemployment was estimated at 15 million (16%). The potential for underemployment was estimated at 45% bythe Indonesian Federation of Workers. Especially affected were the construction and manufacturing sectors (shoes,textiles, garments, electronics). The Indonesian Association of Textile Industries estimated 15% laid off of the 2million in the sector, mostly women; the Association of Construction Industries estimated some 3-4 million laid off,mostly men. The banking sector was hard hit. Many of the people who continued working were paid less. Jobsunder public sector contracts dwindled as public funding was decreased and delayed. However, by July 1998 thedrought seemed over and rural areas producing for export (rubber, palm oil, coffee, cocoa, etc.) saw greatlyincreased incomes due to the gradual rupiah depreciation (from some Rp2,500 per dollar mid-1997 to aboutRpl5,000 mid-1998 and back to Rp8,000 since the third quarter). Many urban jobless returned to their town orvillage of origin, thus mitigating the urban plight.

Java is the most affected island. It has about 120 million persons or 60% of Indonesia's population, 40million living in urban areas (65% of the urban population), most of the larger cities that are more affected, andmore than 5 million "absolute" urban poor (some 70% of the total) prior to the crisis. Java's urban areas had some8 million manufacturing jobs (73% of Indonesia's total), 2.6 million construction workers (65% of the total),equally high shares of service jobs and more than 80% of the foreign investment--most of which was lost. Java'srural areas produce mostly rice; the rice price increase lagged other prices and with an average 900 persons perkm2, expanding cultivated areas is difficult. Sumatra, with some 20% of the population and almost 1 million urbanpoor pre-crisis, seems the second most affected island, in particular its larger cities in the provinces of SumatraUtara and Sumatra Selatan.

The Government "crisis" strategy included assistance to the rural areas, where the cost of living is lower,and to encourage seasonal migrants who lost their urban job, to return to their villages--rural-urban linkages arestrong in Indonesia. In particular, the Government provided some new and continued other rural programs,including Bank-assisted projects. Other donor agencies also amended their programs. The Government, mostlywith IMF and adjustment lending counterpart rupiah, also undertook: a) subsidy programs for necessities in allareas--a food distribution program to provide rice, sugar and cooking oil at below-market prices; at times, foodcoupons for free meals; subsidized medicines; school fee waivers for poor families; b) labor intensive programs forsmall works, some of which were already in municipal plans, with Rp6 trillion budgeted for 1998/9 though not allwas spent; c) a crisis alleviation program (PDM-DKE) launched in November 1998; it provides funds to allsubdistricts in proportion to the estimated number of poor and relative level of local prices. The scheme is based onthe KDP model and its funds can be disbursed until June 30, 1999. The Government allocation for "socialprograms" was large--totaling some Rpl8 trillion ($2.2 billion equivalent) for the fiscal year ending March 1999.Local govermments also implement their own programs; some of them promote food production on idle urban land.A district level Coordination Committee for social programs was started late 1998 with participation of all localagencies, in order to improve effectiveness of the programs.

For 1999/0 the Government objective is to increase "recovery" programs, reduce unsustainable "welfare"programs and improve those retained. The total needed for social support should not exceed RplO trillion evenallowing for imperfect targeting and overheads; some of this is already funded. Unnecessary area overlaps ofprograms would be avoided. The PDM-DKE implementation would be improved, partly by preparing staff better.Ad-hoc labor intensive schemes are no longer planned; they were not very efficient nor effective, and anywaycontractors are switching to higher labor intensity because of the new relative prices (many have exported theirequipment). But public sector job generation remains jeopardized: the Government's December 1998 draft budgetwas only some 50% in real terms of the 1998/9 budget, with even greater decreases in the routine and the"projects" budgets that are the more labor intensive (a small counterpart funding for projects has multiplier effectsas it can trigger release of a 4-5-fold foreign funded portion; this multiplier effect, and related jobs, was mostly lostin 1998/9). "Programs" kept its allocation (in nominal terms), seem to crowd out projects and probably absorb theforeign adjustment loans. Foreign funding assumed in the draft budget was almost 30% (Rp77 trillion, or some $10billion--1999/0 budget in Rp trillion: 218 total, 134 routine, 83 development, of which 30 "projects" and 53"program", and this including 21.7 for "bank restructuring"). Actual 1998/9 expenditures were much lower than


the budget. The new budget was still under discussion in February. Parliamentary elections are scheduled for June1999 and subsequent budget changes can be expected.

3. Sector issues to be addressed by the project and strategic choices:

As poverty reduction is not a "sector", issues in social sectors such as education, health, trade, and publictransport are not addressed by this project. Indonesia's vast archipelago with some 60 million persons in urbanareas and some 12 million urban poor and newly impoverished, make it difficult to address "all" urban poverty.The project design (details in Annex 2) makes the following strategic choices:

Geographical coverage: The proposed project will assist the neediest urban areas on Java. In 1999/0 thePDM-DKE is to assist other urban areas (and rural subdistricts not covered by the KDP, VIP and a OECF "VIP").Thus the 4 projects are complementary even if only the PDM-DKE is crisis related, and thus is simpler (with lessfacilitation), provides less funding "per capita" and admits to lower sustainability expectations. The BPSdefinitions of "urban" and "rural" are used in the 4 projects. Funds will thus be available in all urban areas not todistort location choices of the unemployed and needy. Other complementary programs, such as food andscholarship programs, will continue. The UPP more complex logistics and facilitator deployment for establishing amore sustainable program for the "structural poor", require starting in a limited area; its grass roots approach wouldbe gradually expanded to other areas and phase out "crisis" programs. Thus, the project will begin in dense urbancorridors, in 59 districts in the northern half of Java and in Yogyakarta, Bandung and Malang. They comprisesome 30 million urban residents in a small area. Within this area, facilitators will start in the 1305 largerkelurahans (of more than 7500 persons) totaling 23 million, to reach the most poor (Phase 1). A Phase 2 wouldstart some 3 months later under the project, expanding on Java, into the 1540 smallerkelurahans with 7 million, inthe same northern districts, and/or into the "southern" districts including 1360 urban areas, mostly small, totaling 8million persons (page 25). If the approach is successful, another project/funding source would then be found tospread it. To help target locations local governments ranked kelurahans, and within the selected kelurahans, theywill rank neighborhoods, according to poverty level. Data collected by the family planning groups (BKKBN) canhelp identify poor households (SUSENAS, the household expenditure survey, data allow to pinpoint the poorerdistricts, but not poorer subdistricts or smaller areas. There is not a good, up to date standard database at nationallevel, to identify poor urban neighborhoods, but this should not be necessary with decentralization).

Target group: Oversight consultants will verify the poverty levels in neighborhoods before facilitators startdistributing in them a circular with information on the program. Eligibility of households submitting proposals forfunding will also be verified by facilitators to reduce the potential for capture byelites. Incomes of a family of 4should be less than about Rp250,000 per month, and whether the household head/spouse is working, the house isrented, and the quality of the house, will also be considered; however, one third of the group members may bebetter off, to facilitate self-help within the community. It is likely that the long term poor or near poor willparticipate the most in the program with this selection process. The relatively better off among the poor mayqualify more easily to access funds that have to revolve. Still, their activities usually involve hiring unskilledworkers. Factory workers laid-off would be mostly interested in getting their jobs back, and may participate morein temporary public works. The project aims at reaching the poorest 25% of the populations in the selected areas. .Other social programs are expected to continue prior to and in parallel to this project to reach other groups.

Funding allocations: The funds will be a one time grant to kelurahans. The grants vary with population:Rpl,250 million (more than 30,000 persons), Rp750 million (between 30,000 and 22,500 residents), Rp500 million(22,500 to 15,000), Rp250 million (15,000 to 7,500) and RplOO million (less than 7,500). Thus a similar averageper capita is provided, starting at some Rp22,000 in the smaller kelurahans and reaching about Rp29,000 in thelarger ones, taking into account that prices are higher in the larger kelurahans. Poverty incidences are assumed tobe similar. An RW can draw up to Rp 100 million. The kelurahan grant is not an entitlement; balances uncommitted6 months after the project start in a kelurahan, will be transferred elsewhere.

Uses of grants: Funds can be used over up to 18 months, for subloans, microcredits and infrastructuregrants, by demand by community groups. a) The menu is open except for a negative list (arms, harmful drugs,depositing project funds in banks to earn interest, land acquisition, religious buildings, government administration,


and environmentally harmful products). During the training of facilitators, and when these speak with thecommunities, some activities will be encouraged, such as urban agriculture, group training in the kampung,apprenticeships or skills training, programs for children/youth, family planning education, community basedhousing. New street shops will be discouraged. The ceiling for subloans is Rp3O million, for any proposal bygroups for economic activities; loans have to be repaid within a year, with a commercial interest rate. Groupsshould have at least 3 members (different households)--a minimum group size that is small, reduces transactioncosts. b) Maxima increasing with kelurahan size are allowed for a revolving fund for microcredits, for individualsand groups. c) Small public infrastructures in the neighborhoods will pay labor for output, at rates equivalent tominimum wages.

Timing: By financing demand-driven subprojects, the need for time consuming project preparation by agovernment agency is reduced; a large coverage is possible while maintaining a small and flexible scope at eachlocation; subprojects would suit local needs better. However, initial preparation for this type of project takes sometime for organization, logistics and set up (schedule in Annex 11). Disbursements for subprojects would start inJuly 1999.

Credit size: The credit size is determined by IDA availability, SDR73.5 million. $15.5 m have beenreallocated to the UPP from uncommitted funds under the Surabaya Urban Development Project (SUDP, Loan No.3726-IND) in order to start the UPP before credit proceeds are available. Even so, Bank funding is insufficient forall kelurahans. In a year, whether further funding is justified will be clearer.

Complementary programs: No amount of assistance targeted to the poor will revive the economy norprevent some people requiring welfare. A multiprong approach can protect employment and not only help theunemployed in urban areas:

a) assistance to Small and Medium Size Enterprises. SMEs are normally the largest employers but they becamefinancially strapped and laid off workers. Many have closed, unable to adjust to inflation at 80% annualizedrates, commercial interest rates at 40% (even 70% in 1998), and to buy inputs (normally in cash). TheGovernment provides subsidized credit for SMEs; the program efficiency could be improved. However,financing is not the only constraint-demand is low; the 300% rupiah devaluation provides short term importsubstitution and export opportunities.

b) protection of public work expenditures. Public work contractors are mostly idle--economically justified publicworks are normally required to help end depressions. Public works budgets could be increased and be releasedon time to provide more continuous employment.

c) Training programs could enhance skills of the unemployed and increase productivity when economic activitypicks up.

C: Project Description Summary

1. Project components (see Annex 2 for a detailed description and Annex 3for a detailed cost breakdown):

Component Category Indicative % of Total IDA Ln. 3726- % IDA/Costs US$M financing IND IBRD

US$M1/ US$M financingGrants for subprojects Physical investments!

Revolving credits! ) 109.4 84% 98.5 90%Group assistants

TA for implementation Project management 1.0 12% 1.0 100%Oversight consultants 4.5 4.5 100%Kelurahan facilitators 10.0 10.0 100%

TA for monitoring Consultants 1.5 1% 1.5 100%GOI administration Project management 3.3 3%

Total 129.7 100% 100.0 15.51-The Credit is SDR73.5 m; dollar equivalents are shown.


2. Key policy and institutional reforms to be sought:

After an initial period of centralized organization, needed for a widespread start, the community decides onspending priorities in a Kelurahan Forum (KF), larger than the current LKMD. Groups with approved subprojectsselect their own facilitators or technical experts and may pay them from theirkelurahan grant funding or by sharingexpected profits. The project thus proposes to mobilize informal and private sector local institutions and expertiseto assist. Payments will be according to certified output, from a commercial bank account. Interest accrued onrevolving funds should be allocated for maintenance of local infrastructure, forkelurahan administration, includingannual audits to be initiated by the KF, and for other local priorities. The activities should result in sustainablekelurahan investments, a Kelurahan Fund, and empowerment for broader participation in decision making aboutcommunity matters. Women and men should have equal opportunity. The project thus also supports the shift toelected lurahs during 1999, required by the new law on local government, and the working of the new CoordinationCommittee for Social Programs at district level, that has to appointsubdistrict project managers. The project mayencourage civic groups to engage in the Committee meetings or to form an Urban Community Forum, at district orsubdistrict level.

Government offices will be involved for public administration and community support, rather than in theirtraditional top-down role. Local agency staff will be trained and invited to assist communities alongside privatesector facilitators. It is hoped that as with the VIP in rural areas, this participatory system will meet small localneeds better, mobilize local private resources and manpower, lower unit costs, and accelerate implementation, morethan a more hierarchical approach better suited to large investments. However, it is acknowledged that thecommunity-based approach has risks, due to less social cohesion in urban areas and the potential for the moreeducated to capture the funds, though transparency may be better in denser areas. Progress will be monitoredclosely. If successful, future similar programs may be managed at district level.

The project does not include policy studies, because many are already included under other programs.

3. Institutional and implementation arrangements:

Overall coordination, management, budgeting and monitoring responsibilities are with a Secretariat inBappenas (an expanded VIP/KDP/UPP Secretariat), under the Regional Development Deputy. An interministerialcoordination committee, chaired by Bappenas, is to resolve coordination problems. This set-up parallels that forVIP, that has worked well.

District agencies will select an administrative project manager (PjOK) for appointment by theBupati orWalikota for at least 24 months. The PjOK will be located at subdistrict level (kecamatan) to verify procedures andendorse payments from the grant. For infrastructure proposals, the Public Works Department of the Kabupaten(DPUK) would be consulted to ensure correct standards and fit with municipal plans. The same agencies haveprioritized kelurahans and RWs, the poverty level to be verified by the oversight consultant and the lurahs.Selected agency staff will be trained along the consultant facilitators.

Disbursements for grants and subloans to groups will be made by the local BRI Unit, with presentation ofthe Implementation Agreement (Annexl2) or claims, signed by the representatives of the group and thePjOK,attaching the approved proposal signed by the consultant, the Kelurahan Forum leader and the lurah. BankIndonesia shall have a Special Account (SA); the regional treasury offices (KPKNs) will authorize transfers fromthe SA and GOI funds to designated kelurahan accounts, to be released in 3 tranches of the kelurahan grant: 40%(with the first 5 implementation agreements), 40% and 20% (see Annex 6).

Monitoring will be carried out beyond that by the Secretariat and the Bank. The project provides formonitoring under provincial or district level contracts, to make each task more manageable, in terms of progress,transparency, profiles of laborers and beneficiaries, beneficiary satisfaction, etc. Local governments and journalistsare invited to visit the sites and publish their findings. Complaints and suggestions can be logged at akelurahanbox, and at the Secretariat's P.O. Box 2222, Jakarta (P.O. Box 5000 is widely used for another poverty project) ande-mail, [email protected]. The Annex 2 will be widely distributed (in Indonesian) and posted on the Web


with progress reports (in Indonesian and English).

Audits will be conducted annually by the various government level audit agencies. They are expected tocoordinate their sampling to avoid a kelurahan or RW being audited more than once in a year. KFs are expected toselect private sector auditors located outside the kelurahan to have their accounts audited every year.

Several levels of technical assistance for implementation are anticipated:

a) national project management. A Bappenas Secretariat will be strengthened by a small consultant team to assistwith project management, organization, monitoring, reporting, procurement, and training of oversightconsultants, kelurahan facilitators and selected local agency staff.

b) district/provincial oversight consultants. Nine firms (associations of firms) were selected and contracted for 2years, 2 firms for each of Jakarta, West, Center and East Java, and one for Yogyakarta, to establish consultantteams and subteams in various municipalities, to provide reasonable access from most urban areas. Theoversight consultants are to approve, and help design if necessary, the proposals made by groups, and superviseprogress to certify payment requests. Later on, the districts would procure oversight consultants as needed.

c) facilitators. i) Kelurahan facilitators: The oversight consultant firms also provide kelurahan facilitators for 24months, at least one per kelurahan exceeding 7,500 residents, to help disseminate the program details, assistwith subproject preparation and supervise implementation. Facilitators can come from localNGOs, universitiesor firms, subcontracted by or in association with the OC firm. ii) Group technical assistants: Groups can agreewith local consultants on help to prepare or implement subprojects, and on payment, as may be needed. iii)Community trainee facilitators: will be selected from local volunteers and be paid by the oversight consultantfor 6 months after which they may be retained by the KF.

d) monitoring consultants will also be provided; some may be contracted at district level.

4. Benefits and target population:

The target population are the poor and newly impoverished people in urban areas on Java. The bottom 30%comprises some 12 million persons, some 3 million households. As the number of poor has increased more thanproportionally on Java, this may comprise more than 75% of the target group in Indonesia overall. No citytargeting is proposed because populations are mobile: assisting only large cities, where most jobs were lost, couldencourage people to remain even if they have alternatives elsewhere. However, within urban areas it is foreseen toassist only the poorest neighborhoods, normally in the fringes and in old cores. There the project would rely onself-targeting mechanisms and community group review and selection (e.g. by setting wages at the local minimumfor public works, and payment per output not per input; and restricting credit eligibility only to households withincomes of less than about Rp250,000 per month (for 4 members). Hopefully many of the poor households couldbenefit from the project already the first year--communities having learned the process and having had more timeto generate ideas, the number of participants could increase the second year. By revolving the funds, the number ofbeneficiaries can continue to increase. The project coverage would be reduced should the rupiah strengthen.

Project benefits (see also Section E) would be:

a) creation of temporary jobs and small public works; local improvements tend to have high economic returns;b) benefits from economic activities, such as agricultural production on idle urban land, mainly for local

consumption; creation of hopefully, lasting small businesses, of skills through training and apprenticeships.Economic activities by the poor have normally good returns, though the market conditions are difficult.Increased agroprocessing businesses could also promote urban-rural linkages;

c) establishment of revolving funds, including microcredit funds, to benefit more participants in the future; suchfunds have shown high repayment rates. All repayments will belong to the kelurahan, that will thus have aninterest in enforcing repayment and in selecting subprojects with public benefits;

d) promotion of long term decentralization and community empowerment objectives, that could have multipliereffects. Funds should be available in a kelurahan account for further use with the project principles including


for maintenance of local infrastructures, local administration and other priorities currentlyunfunded. Localagencies will be more involved. The project, if successful, would have a demonstration effect.

D: Project Rationale

1. Project alternatives considered and reasons for rejection:

The project relies on the poor communities to select and implement subprojects, to maximize the likelihoodof funds getting directly to the needy and to the more useful subprojects, of achieving low unit costs, and of fastimplementation. Facilitators will assist in targeting and in the project process.

The alternative approaches considered for this project and rejected are

a) a standard investment project. This process through public agencies is slow and hardly reaches the individualsin the communities who need direct assistance. Furthermore, agencies' staff has full agendas and could notundertake such an extra effort without consultants. Overheads also tend to be higher than with a communityparticipation system.

b) a public works program. There are labor intensive public work programs, that have not proved very efficient oreffective. Groups reached are not the poorest, quality is generally poor, only a small proportion of the costgoes for labor, and leakages are a concern. Food for work is rather inefficient, and was not considered.

c) a "negative tax", that is, distributing cash or vouchers for food purchases to the most needy. This could be anattractive option, but the Bank normally does not finance "consumption". A food stamp program, programs forlow priced necessities and waived school fees for poor families already reduce the daily need for cash.

Alternative geographical coverages were also considered. Only large cities for instance, would beinappropriate because labor and even more the newly unemployed are mobile and likely to move to where the costof living and prospects for work are best. Thus public programs should be available in any area as much as wheremost jobs were lost. All of Indonesia in one project was considered too ambitious; Java was selected due to itsconcentration of poor. Even so logistics are considerable; a staged start was preferable--and mandated by financialconstraints.

2. Major related projects financed by the Bank and/or other development agencies (completed, ongoing andplanned):

This project fits with a number of activities under ongoing urban projects such as KIP (urban neighborhoodimprovement programs). The VIPs have been successful in rural areas of Java, and include the communityapproach. Many potential activities involving communities have been identified and could be pursued under theproposed project with minimum delay (from the Municipal Innovations Project (approved in February 1999), theproposed West Java and Jakarta Environmental Project, the NGO network to channel social funds, and USAID'songoing CLEAN). The environmental and resettlement guidelines for the project are the same as for the MunicipalInnovations Project; this facilitates administration and general understanding.

Latest Status Report Ratings(Bank-financed projects only)

Project _Implementation Development

Progress (IP) Objective (DO)Bank-financedCommunity planning and implementation VIPs HS/S HS/SKIP UDPs HS/SNew approaches in cities Municipal Innovations LIL To start

Other development agenciesADB, AusAid, GTZ, IFAD, SwissAid,USAID: decentralization, etc.

IP/DO Ratings: HS (Highly Satisfactory), S (Satisfactory), U (Unsatisfactory), HU (Highly Unsatisfactory)

Indonesia: Urban Poverty ProjectTPAD

3. Lessons learned and reflected in the proposedproject design:

The various social funds and similar projects undertaken in the Bank were reviewed already for the KDP,and their findings taken into account. But more particularly, the vastness and social characteristics of Indonesiahave been taken into account in designing the project--spatial and social structures, customs such asgotong royong(community work), informal safety nets; available skills; incentives. The government structure also has been takeninto account: its hierarchy and staff availability facilitate dissemination of information, so that a "model" can easilyand quickly be replicated across many cities, as was needed to govern such an extended territory. This allows arelatively large project to be implemented through small parallel, independent and varied subprojects--byestablishing standard criteria, allowing demand driven solutions at each location, proceeding through relativelysmall assistance "units". For this to work, the basic organization needs to be relatively centralized, as does themonitoring--as was already adopted for the VIPs.

4. Indications of Borrower commitment and ownership:

The Government requested assistance for the urban poor. Bappenas coordinates with other Ministries;MoHA will provide facilitators and PjOKs on a timely manner and for the duration of the project implementationin the respective kecamatans. MoF will provide the amount required for an early start before credit effectiveness.BRI will provide the payment service at its many outlets and cover its costs with the interest it may earn ontemporary balances. The project's community based approach is being followed by some other programs, to lessenmultiplicity of procedures and eventual inconsistencies; in particular, it is coordinated with the PDM-DKEprogram.

5. Value added of Bank support in this project:

The main value added of the Bank is a) experience with similar approaches in rural areas, and thus promptassistance with the project definition and in organizing the preparation activities, b) executing the PHRD grant forfaster project preparation, c) low cost IDA funding (that however entailed a delay), and later d) in independentsupervision and monitoring. If successful, the approach can be replicated and further Bank financing, provided.

E: Summary Project Analysis

1. Economic [supported by Annex 4: n.a.]

[ ] Cost benefit analysis: NPV= [x] Cost effectiveness analysis [x] Other

Subproject benefits: Putting workers back to work is an objective by itself, to provide purchasing power fornecessities. It is expected that most of the subprojects will be economic activities. The requirement of repaymentof credits with the commercial interest rate prevailing for one year loans (some 40% in February 1999), shouldprovide returns at least that high per year and an expected positive economic return in real terms. The projectreturns will be higher the faster the revolving proceeds; one year maximum is allowed but shorter cycles arecommon for small credits. Small business may fail, but even so repayment is expected (microcredits have some ofthe better repayment performances). Training should have good returns; it should enable unemployed persons toaccess jobs requiring more skills. The trainees are to repay to the kelurahan, the training and stipend cost. RWswith non performing groups may be ineligible for assistance the following year (this would pressure groups torepay). Urban agriculture on idle land (land is fertile on Java) should increase food or incomes. Small works orenvironmental improvements, greening of public spaces, etc. normally have good economic returns and their costsmay be lower and quality better with the project's community approach than with the conventional contractorapproach. Because of the externalities involved in public infrastructure and environmental improvements, andpresumably more beneficiaries than for private economic activities, grant funding is justified. Infrastructure withpoor benefits or few beneficiaries would probably not be undertaken, since the opportunity cost to thekelurahan isthe return from economic activities and the potential for accessing revolving funds, or even the prospect of havingthe proposal rejected at the Kelurahan Forum. The "market" should work in the presence of constrained funds.

Institutional benefits: The process of community empowerment, the creation of a revolving fund and amaintenance fund from interest accruals, the acquisition of new skills, could provide the basis for some sustainedimprovement in poor neighborhoods. The involvement of local agency staff in new ways to assist theirkelurahan


constituencies, and eventual delegation of procuring consultants to district level, would prepare them to continuesimilar programs with their own resources, if this was desired and the approach is found useful and cost-effective.Paying facilitators partly by output rather than only by input should improve their effectiveness. Community groupswill select their own consultants and payment method.

Targeting efficiency. Targeting has a high cost, but it is less costly than non targeted programs in tenns ofcost per poor assisted, at least at poverty rates below 50%--the "overhead" cost of non targeted programs isinversely related to the poverty rate. Increased targeting would increase the program overheads and lower theshare of funds benefiting the poor (the rule applied is that if increasing targeting costs more than the "leakage" itavoids, then it is not worthwhile). Targeting the poor should be reasonably effective as self-enforcing mechanismsand incentives have been built into the program rules; however, some less poor can be asked to join groups toprovide skills or other help. Only minimum wages would be paid for public works, based on output (less thanminimum wages is not feasible as minimum wages are already low, eroded with inflation). Households of 4 withmore than about Rp250,000 income per month would not be eligible formicrocredit (close to the poverty line, thatmay be adjusted for inflation year 2). The project should operate only in the poorerRWs and information would bewidespread to ensure equal opportunity.

The altemative of straight welfare payments could have a lower initial cost if targeting was very good;compared to funding small public works, the cost of inputs other than labor, often more than 70%, would beavoided. But so would be the multiplier effect on the people providing the inputs, and the benefits from theinfrastructure. Compared to economic activities, the "revolving" of public funds and the sense of accomplishmentof the poor, would be lost with welfare payments. The program hopes to provide assistance that is sustainable,while admitting that for economic recovery and sheer welfare other programs are needed.

The cost of overheads--consultants, facilitators and govemment administration--is some 17% of the projectcost or 20% of the kelurahan grant cost. The overall economic return should still be good (employment ofconsultants and facilitators is a benefit in itself, currently). The project cost per poor person in the urban areas isabout $10, or some $40 per poor household (the dollar cost depends on the rupiah exchange rate). If participationrate is a third, the cost trebles per poor beneficiary. However, as funds are to revolve or infrastructure benefits aremore widespread, the fiscal cost per beneficiary will be lower. The project's overhead cost per beneficiary iscomparable to that of other programs.

Detailed economic analysis is not worthwhile ex ante, as it would be no more credible than theassumptions made. The built-in incentives should help achieve good results. Close monitoring will be undertakento evaluate results in a sample of neighborhoods 6 months after the project's effective start and monitoring willcontinue subsequently, to determine on a continuous basis potential improvements to the project design (or evenchange of approach).

2. Financial (Annex 5): n.a. NPV=n.a.; FRR=n.a.

The project design is considered the best that could be identified in fiscal terms. A strongerrupiah wouldresult in a smaller credit coverage and higher unit costs in dollars, as the kelurahan grant amounts and contracts foroversight consultants and facilitators are in rupiah. The Credit balance and commitment projections will bemonitored carefully before expanding into a subsequent project phase.

Technical and financial audits by the monitoring consultants will be important to check the adequacy offund use, in a more timely fashion to enable action taken where anomalies or abuses are found, than would befeasible with only annual audits, months after the fiscal year closing. The locations would be chosen some bysampling and some by supervision alerts. The central audit bureau (BPKP) will coordinate its sampling ofcommunities for audit with audit agencies at lower levels. They will review due diligence and due process, and theattainment of performance as per agreed indicators.

3. Technical

For small works, the standard MPW guidelines will be used as relevant and the local agency will beconsulted for areawide implications. For economic activities, a screening will be undertaken at the community


level and as there is expected to be competition for the funds, only the best proposals are expected to be funded.Consultants will verify the technical quality and compliance with any required environmental and compensationguidelines before approving subprojects and disbursements. A new "technical" manual is not proposed, but theguidelines, procurement methods, reporting, etc. (annexes to this PAD) will be widely available, in a ProjectManual and on the Web, in Indonesian.

4. Institutional

An effort is needed up front to train local agency staff, oversight consultants andkelurahan facilitators withthe simplest of criteria and requirements (PAD Annexes are the basis) for a start of the program in 1305kelurahans--with some 23 million urban residents, and presumably more than 1 million households eligible andinterested in participating. Mobilizing non-profit organizations and community groups such as religious groups, isessential (see 7. below). Paying facilitators partly based on subprojects disbursement progress should improvestandard performance. The project will also train facilitators from the communities, to assist in the future. Thepreparation has a critical path plan (Annex 11).

5. Social and resettlement

[x] Summarize issues below [] To be defined [] No issues

Rapid assessments were made during July 1998 by the project preparation team in 10 provinces, in poorcommunities and at local agencies, to test and refine the approach and to identify the best ways to disseminateinformation on the program (for instance, the idea of a TV campaign was discarded; the appropriateness of the areacoverage was confirmed). Some rapid assessments have also been conducted under ongoing urban projects,notably in relation to labor intensive works, and the Bank undertook 2 crisis assessments in 1998 (one early onbased on the SUSENAS and later, a "trend" survey).

There is always the risk that the poorest will be the least able to access project funds. However, somecompetition for funds has to be kept to encourage the best uses and sustainability, while the selection will be basedon consensus or voting in the kelurahan. The credit size cannot cover all poor and the project does not pretend tobe able to solve all problems. Thus, the poorest people would continue to need access to free meals, assistancewith school expenses, etc. as is foreseen by the Government. (targeting is discussed under "Economic", above)

No resettlement is expected. Any land acquisition would be very minor, since the grants do not finance itand poor residents can't afford it. Still, resettlement guidelines apply (Annex 13; the same guidelines apply for theMunicipal Innovations Project that would be implemented in parallel).

6. Environmental assessment: n.a. Environmental category: [ ] A [ x] B [ ] C

The environmental guidelines developed for the Municipal Innovations Project apply for the proposedproject, as well. It is expected that works will be minor and if anything, they should have a positive environmentaleffect. Some economic activities may have some negative impact (such as toxic effluents from textile dyes, etc.).All negative impacts should be identified by the oversight consultants and mitigating measures proposed andadopted, and monitored.

7. Participatory approach [key stakeholders, how involved, and what they have influenced; if participatoryapproach not used, describe why not applicable]

The proposed Kelurahan Forum will enable a wider participation in community decisions and will haveincreased resources under local decision-making. The community groups are to identify and implement thesubprojects to be financed. Facilitators will help with targeting, and consultants (that may beNGOs, consultingfirms, government agencies, universities) will assist the subproject process. Community groups can select theirown facilitators and will handle their payment, based on output or profit sharing. Local agencies can assist morethan under traditional projects. That is, a wide spectrum of stakeholders is involved.

Several meetings have taken place early this year with representatives of the more widely represented non-profit organizations (these are more active outside Java) and religious groups. They expressed support to the


proposed assistance, willingness to work with the communities, to mobilize their local chapters and to compete forcontracts. Municipal agencies have also expressed their support and requested project funds be made availablesoonest; many have started programs on their own (such as urban agriculture for production of food, laborintensive works). Rapid assessments have also been conducted for project preparation (see above).

F: Sustainability and Risks

1. Sustainability:

The proposed project has limited but important objectives: provide people with purchasing power in abetter way than distributing cash for consumption; improve local infrastructure and environment; fund sustainablesubprojects; develop community and local institutions. Lessons may be learnt that can be used to deal morepermanently with urban poverty reduction in Indonesia and elsewhere: for instance, in the promotion of urbanagriculture, assistance to improve housing, promotion of training, credits in the absence of a functioning bankingsystem, etc.

2. Critical Risks (reflecting assumptions in the fourth column ofAnnex 1):

Risk Risk Risk Minimization MeasureRating

Annex 1, cell "from Outputs to Objective"

Improper targeting and capture by elites M Careful training and follow upInconsistent incentives across poverty programs M Interministerial committees can provide

consistency in "benefits"Lack of market for economic outputs M The poor assisted to focus on

marketable products and skills

Annex 1, cell "from Components to Outputs"

Lack of counterpart funds M MoF ensured availability of GOI fundsprior to and after credit effectiveness.

Insufficient facilitator capacity M Trainers engaged to acceleratefacilitator deployment and know-how.

Improper use of funds S Built-in community surveillance,incentives, transparency, audits,penalties for misuse, outsider reviews

Overall Risk Rating MRisk Rating - H (High Risk), S (Substantial Risk), M (Modest Risk), N (Negligible or Low Risk)

Some questions arose whether this level of assistance woulda) overwhelm NGO and local consultant capacities--the increased social programs leave limited consultant

availability; emphasis is placed on training, including government staff;b) undermine informal safety nets--the needs are much greater than usual and the proposed assistance may not

be enough; if the assistance is not in demand by target groups, it would be redirected, as it is not anentitlement;

c) result in leakages--the transparency features should help reduce leakages compared to other programs. Aconcern is that the many welfare programs would undermine the sustainability desired under the project.

3. Possible Controversial Aspects:

Probably the major controversy would arise if the Bank did not assist. This could result in less wellprrepared welfare programs being expanded. The risks of the project have been discussed and addressed aspossible-still, remaining risks will have to be accepted as better program alternatives could not be identified.


Perfect targeting is not feasible at reasonable cost, but given the area selection, types of programs and incentivesbuilt into project aspects, most beneficiaries should be poor if not the poorest. The lack of ex-ante detailedeconomic return justifications is not uncommon in poverty programs; but returns of potential activities are normallygood.

G: Main Credit Conditions

1. Effectiveness conditions: Standard requirements only.

2. Other [classify according to covenant types used in the Credit Agreement]

The main covenants relate to project implementation (description in Annex 2), monitoring, transparency,compliance with the Bank's guidelines for land acquisition and environmental criteria as may be applicable. Datedcovenants (expected after credit effectiveness) relate to:

a) Selection of PjOKs for 1500 project kelurahan by not later than September 15, 1999 (a second phase).b) Issuance of public information on the project to second phase projectkelurahan residents, by not later than

October 15, 1999.c) Provision of reports on the project implementation: quarterly reports by April 30, July 31 and October 31;

annual reports by January 31 each year; monitoring and evaluation reports also by January 31.d) Review of project reports with the IDA by March 1 each project year.

H. Readiness for Implementation

A consultant team (financed with a PHRD grant) was recruited early July 1998. It has undertaken fieldsurveys/rapid assessments and refined the project concept. Statistics on urban areas were obtained and analyzed.Local agencies have ranked kelurahans by 1998 poverty levels. The team had started project implementationactivities, such as the advance process procurement of oversight consultants and kelurahan facilitators (353expressions of interest were received following advertising in 6 provincial newspapers). Requests for bidsincluding terms of reference, draft contract, letter of invitation with supplementary clarifications, evaluation criteriaand data on the areas to be assisted were provided to 45 firms shortlisted for 9 contracts. Bid evaluation wascompleted in April. Further, 5 training teams, from the private sector and including staff from MoHA, wereselected to conduct parallel series of training sessions for facilitators, that started in April. Preparation for and thetraining are also financed by the grant and mobilization of consultants are financed by the SUDP loan, both aheadof credit effectiveness. The national level management consultancy has been advertised; shortlisted firms wereinvited to bid./ is awaited before . Alternative project circulars were tested in a few neighborhoods and one wasfinalized.

A draft Project Manual with the project description and procedures (PAD Annexes and explanations, inIndonesian, including bookkeeping requirements) was available in December 1998; the final Manual was clearedand printed in April 1999. The regulation establishing the Secretariat for the project in Bappenas has been signed.MoF has agreed to prefmance the initial advance to kelurahans, beyond its 10% share. MoHA has selected PjOKsfor the 1305 kelurahans to be assisted first, by Mayl5, 1999. BRI has agreed to handle disbursements under thekelurahan grants; further discussions on procedures will take place in May 1999. A dissemination brochure on theproject also has been agreed and printed.

The (revised) critical preparation path and project implementation plan are in Annex 11. The aim is crediteffectiveness and to be ready for the first disbursements for subprojects in the communities around July 1999.

I. Compliance with Bank Policies

This project is expected to comply with all Bank policies.


[signature]Task Team Leader/Task Manager: ¶da Johansen

[signature] A 4Sector Manager: _Es_m

[signature]Country Manager/Director: Mark Baird


ANNEX 1URBAN POVERTY PROJECT

PROJECT DESIGN SUMMARY

Narrative Summary Key Performance Indicators Monitoring and Evaluation Critical AssumptionsSector-related CAS Goal: (Goal to Bank Mission)

Reducing poverty n.a. under project; CAS, CEM reports GOI, and IMF; macro andSUSENAS, employment, micro; policies and

Participation by and other data objectives are consistent.communities Political stability.

Decentralization

Project Development (Objective to Goal)Objective: # of participating kelurahans MIS Project reporting Transparent information,

starting: Helpful facilitators andImprove or restore initially: Northern Java, Yearly implementation consultants,infrastructure and income 1,305 large kelurahans review Good selection ofsustainably in poor urban later: other kelurahans on Independent monitoring kelurahan/groupscommunities, with a bottom Java Financial statements: KPKNup approach. No delays in counterpart

Transfers to communities: Beneficiary satisfaction funds; in reportingImprove local institutions. 1999: $24 m equivalent surveys

2000: $50 m equivalent2001: $17 m equivalent Kelurahan books2002: $3 m equivalent

Outputs: (Outputs to Objective)Project MIS; monthly, by

Public infrastructures # of subprojects; benefits subdistrict, district & Consistent incentives acrossprovince poverty programs.

Economic activities # of subprojects; returns Yearly implementationreview; monitoring; audits Market identification, timely

Employment # of subproject beneficiaries Supervision findings repayment of credit.# m-m employment Newspaper articles

Final evaluationProject Components Inputs: (budget for each (Components to Outputs)

component)Subprojects $109.4m Secretariat/TA/Bank/BPKP Counterpart means availableTA for implementation $ 15.5m will supervise, monitor, Facilitator capacityTA for monitoring $ 1.5m audit inputs and outputs, Proper use of project fundsGOI administration $ 3.3m SoEs

Total $129.7m


URBAN POVERTY PROJECTKEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Indicators 1/ Calendar year1999 2000 2/ 2001 2/

I. INPUTSCumulative number of kelurahans assisted, target 1,305 2,800 2,800Disbursements to Kelurahans, target Rp.bn 200 400 130Oversight consultants/facilitators, persons 1,900 3,000 2,000Government PjOKs and facilitators, persons >700 >1,000 >1,000

II. OUTPUTSSubprojectsCumulative number of proposals 8,000 17,000 20,000Percentage of proposals, approved >80% >80% >80%Subloan repayment per schedule:. Principal, % of due >80% >85% >90%. Interest, % of due >80% >85% >90%Percentage of works completed per schedule >75% >85% >90%

MonitoringNumber of sites monitored by Secretariat >10% >10% >10%Number of sites monitored by Level II ------- each kelurahan twice /year --------

Audits, kelurahan sample 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%

III. IMPACTSIndependent monitoring (NGOs, universities, etc.) ----- 10% of kelurahan surveyed/year------Beneficiary satisfaction surveys: ----- 10% of kelurahan surveyed/year -----. % of persons surveyed, aware of program >70% >80% >90%. % of persons surveyed, satisfied with program >50% >60% >70%1/ All indicators to be available by subdistrict, district and province levels; inputs, subprojects and monitoring updated on a

monthly basis, as part of a computerized MIS (see below). Disaggregation also to be available.2/ Number of additional kelurahan and disbursements in rupiah depend on the rupiah/dollar exchange rate.

COMPUTERIZED MIS DATAA number of other indicators are crucial to ascertain performance of the project, but targets cannot be provided at this stage

because they depend on the selections to be made by the communities. Among the indicators the MIS has to provide, are:

Subprojects Funds for microcreditTarget: 30% of area population to benefit Capital disbursed, Rp. MInfrastructure subprojects Times revolved in 6 months period. Grants, # and Rp.m Interest accrued/repaid. Progress, physical and disbursements Training/apprenticeships. Workers, men and women: #, wage, total wages Cumulative subloans, Rp.mEconomic activities Men /women, training m-mSubloans, # and Rp.m Cost per m-m, RpNew subloans with repayments, # and Rp.m Number employed after trainingParticipation of women, % persons, % value Repayment, Rp.Transparency ImpactsNumber of meetings held in Project kelurahans Only part of the information on impacts can be in the MIS,Time required to establish Kelurahan Forum /groupsMonitoring boards, number and adequacy Income generation; benefits, beneficiaries, sustainability, etc.Complaints; Web site; email address; P.O. BoxNewspaper articles

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD


PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Objectives. To fund activities to benefit the poor in kelurahan on an ongoing basis via a) capital to revolvefor sustainable income generation and b) grants for basic infrastructure works and related employment. Activitiesshould be through community participation in selection and implementation, should be transparent and open toscrutiny. Broadly, to empower urban communities to help them overcome poverty, and to improve capability oflocal agencies to assist poor communities.

Where? The project will begin in 59 districts of Java, in the northern half and in Yogyakarta, Bandungand Malang, where most of the dense urban areas and urban poor are (district list attached). They comprise 1305kelurahans with more than 7500 persons each and total some 23 million people (first phase) and 1540 smallerkelurahan, totaling some 7 million. Bappedas I and II have ranked kelurahans in the 59 districts. "Southem" Javacomprises 1,360 kelurahan, of which 1,052 are small. Coverage of a second phase will be determined about mid-1999, and depends partly on the rupiah exchange rate that determines the loan funding reach. Camats are topinpoint the poorer RWs (each kelurahan averages 10 RW, each RW averages 500 families) based on incomelevels and other household poverty criteria. After site verification visits, the oversight consultant will confirm withthe camat and lurah, the selection of neighborhoods. At this stage, "group" targeting takes over from "location"targeting.

Funding allocations. Allocations are grants to kelurahans varying according to size (table overleaf). Tofacilitate transparency at the local level there is a ceiling of RplO0 million per RW-however, funds are notentitlements and may be redirected from kelurahans with low progress after 12 months. The grants will be allocatedto each kelurahan 1 time under the project.

Uses of funds. The kelurahan grant is for subloans for sustainable economic activities and for grants forupgrading and building small public infrastructures, by demand by community groups. Subprojects have to beproposed within 6 months of program launch in the kelurahan but funds can be used over 1 year from the date ofthe initial advance.

Economic activities. The menu is open. Examples of possible activities: urban agriculture; group training inthe communities (a subloan can cover a stipend); equipment (such as sewing machines, computers); programs forchildren and youth; community based housing provided it can be done within 1 year; family planning education.Each kelurahan can also establish a microcredit fund to provide small revolving credits to individuals and groups.Microcredits can be requested for training (apprenticeships (training on the job where the employer may pay part ofa minimum wage and a subloan pay the balance, for up to 6 months); other public or private training programs(lists may be available at Dikmas atDepnaker). New street shops are discouraged. The following cannot be funded:arms, harmful drugs, depositing project funds in banks to earn interest, land acquisition, religious buildings,government administration, environmentally harmful products.

Group eligibility. Groups (KSMs) formed for economic activities should have at least 3 members (differenthouseholds); incomes of a family of 4 should be less than about Rp250,000 per month (this amount may beadjusted with inflation by year 2; to attract higher skills, up to a third of the members may have higher incomes);some BKKBN poverty criteria would also apply (is the household head working; is the spouse working; do theyrent the house; quality of house). Membership of the KSM would be agreed by the Kelurahan Forum (KF). Eachgroup/person can get funds only once (at least until there are no acceptable proposals by new groups/persons).Women are encouraged to participate and shall have equal opportunity.

Subloans have to be repaid within a year, with interest at the commercial rate prevailing for one year loans;the repayment schedule should reflect the cash flow of the financed activity. The repayments are to be deposited ina Kelurahan Forum account in a local bank of the KF choice, in its name, for revolving following the sameprinciples. This local bank has to be willing to let designated staff attend some KF meetings. The accounts shall not


have ATM cards. Half of the interest accrued should be used to help finance maintenance of local publicinfrastructure; another part should be used to help finance administration of the Kelurahan Forum.

Grants for small infrastructure. The community may choose to improve infrastructure, such as under KIP,upgrading public spaces or parks, greening, environmental improvements. Workers building or repairing selectedpublic infrastructure will be paid based on output, the equivalent of local minimum wage levels, calculated basedon reasonable productivity rates. Anybody accepting a minimum wage is eligible for participating in such publicworks. Some works may be contracted. Some clarifications are in attachment.

Accounting. Each group is expected to keep books for its own activity, and provide summaries to theKelurahan Forum Treasurer on a monthly basis. Facilitators are expected to assist with bookkeeping.

KELURAHANVery small Small Medium Large Very large

1995 Population, persons <7,500 7,500-15,000 15,001-22,500 22,501-30,000 >30,000

Grant size RplOOm Rp250m Rp500m Rp750m Rpl,250m(average per capita) (Rp22,000) (Rp24,000) (Rp27,000) (Rp28,000) (Rp29,000)

Microcredit Fund <Rp7m <RplOm <Rp2Om <Rp3Om <Rp5OmFor groups and individuals

Facilitators hired by Consultant (OC):Kelurahan Facilitators 0.5-1 1 1-2 2 3-4Community Facilitator 1/5,000 pers. 1 2-3 3-4 4-5 6-8

Remuneration:* Kelurahan Facilitator: hired by consultant for 24 months, paid Rp500,000 per month plus 2% of the value of

subprojects approved in parallel to disbursements from BRI. (OC are at district/subdistrict)* Community Trainee Facilitator: volunteers screened and paid up to 6 months RplOO,000/ month by the OC.* Group Technical Assistant: asked by community groups to assist with preparation and implementation of

subprojects and paid under the subproject funding (kelurahan funds) or by profit sharing.

Maximum allocation per RW: Rp 100 m;Subproject cost/group: Minimum Rp 5 m; maximum Rp 30 m

Selection of proposals.

Proposals. People wishing to participate are expected to contribute some funds or labor to the activitiesthey propose; while there is no minimum requirement, contributions should enhance the likelihood of their proposalbeing selected/approved in the KF. Each group prepares a subproject proposal on a standard format provided bythe Kelurahan Facilitator, signed by the group members. The proposals will include a description of the activitiesproposed, costs, the amount of self financing, subloan or grant amount, funding and repayment dates, beneficiaries,O&M plans, compliance with any applicable guidelines on asset/land acquisition or environmental impacts, etc.(some clarifications in attachment). Implementation periods shall not exceed a year from the time of initial funding.

Proposal evaluation. A proposal has first to be approved by the oversight consultant, who reviews itsfeasibility and compliance with guidelines, before it can be submitted to the KF. The program does not set ascoring or evaluation system to prioritize proposals; the evaluation system is left at the discretion of the KF, tofacilitate it maximizing benefits from the funds and the local opportunities identified. The KF will meet to reviewproposals first when it has 5 proposals, and at least monthly thereafter. The selection of proposals shall be made ina meeting publicized in advance and open to the public; the KF shall rank the proposals, members have one voteeach, voting should be visible. The KF will endeavor to approve only good proposals, up to exhausting theallocation. The KF has 6 months from the project start in the kelurahan (first dissemination of information by theKelurahan Facilitator) to present proposals to the PjOK for use of the allocation. Proposals can consolidate various


subprojects of lower costs (e.g. several small business loans). The Dinas PUK has to be consulted about areawideimplications of infrastructure proposals.

Implementation agreements. For economic activities, the OC and KF leader sign proposals they haveapproved, and the lurah countersigns. The signed proposal is attached to an Implementation Agreement, that issigned by the group representative (and all group members overleaf) and the PjOK. The PjOK is appointed by theBupati or Walikota for 24 months and is to be based at the kecamatan office; he would be from level II except inJakarta where the PjOK would come from the kecamatan. For infrastructure subprojects, the same applies exceptthat the lurah signs the Implementation Agreement with the PjOK. A copy is provided to each signatory.

Disbursements for subprojects. Establishment of the KF is a precondition to any disbursement. Initiallythe OC, the Kelurahan Facilitator, the lurah, the KF representative if different from thelurah, and the PjOK providesignature specimens at the designated BRI office. The initial subproject funding can be withdrawn by thecommunity group by presenting the signed Implementation Agreement; BRI verifies the signatures and the amount;the group representative has to sign for the withdrawal. The second disbursement can be withdrawn with approvalfrom the Kelurahan Facilitator after verifying appropriate use of earlier funds. The final disbursement shall beauthorized by the OC after verification of results. The PjOK endorses the payment requests.

Procurement. Procurement will follow best commercial practice. The oversight consultants appointKelurahan Facilitators, individuals or firms, under their own contract or under service subcontracts, based on 3offers. Gender balance will be sought. For Group Technical Assistants the groups and KF can appoint individuals,as needed; the OC may provide long lists to assist with identification of candidates. Goods shall be procured afterquotations are obtained from at least 3 suppliers on the basis of a detailed description and quantity of goods, as wellas the desired delivery time and place. Works that can be implemented efficiently with labor intensive methods canbe undertaken by community participation. Other works can be contracted under lump sum, fixed price contractsawarded on the basis of quotations obtained from 3 domestic contractors in response to a written invitation. Theinvitation shall include a detailed description of the works, including basic specifications, required completion date,a basic form of agreement and relevant drawings, where applicable. The award shall be made to the contractor whooffers the lowest price quotation for the required work, and who has the experience and resources to complete thecontract successfully. (procurement forms in Annex)

Kelurahan administration. Kelurahan Forum (KYF). A KF comprised of RW or RT representatives (aman and a woman) would be established for approval of subprojects. Elected LKMD officials can participate in aprivate capacity. LKMDs to be established during 1999-2000 according to the new local govemment law may bethe KF or part of it. A KF leader/chairperson shall be elected; it may be a lurah but in a private capacity. The finalKF formation will be legalized through an SK from the Bupati or Walikota. The KF can meet at the LKMD officeor another venue. A Financial Unit (UPK) will be established to record disbursements from the kelurahan grant,and to manage the kelurahan revolving fund. The UPK will have a charter as a profit center; will be notarized andwill be audited yearly by accountants from outside the kelurahan. The OC will check this is done. This fund shallreceive repayments from subloans and their interest; the funds shall be onlent to new activities selected on the samebasis. The Treasurer of the UPK should be a woman of a functioning local organization (the term may be one year,renewable; she should have at least a D3). She will follow a standardized bookkeeping system. A person may bedesignated debt collector. Another person(s) shall be trained by the Kelurahan Facilitator as community facilitator.Fees. Work on behalf of the KF is voluntary; however, certain work requiring significant time may be compensated(head, treasurer, debt collector, facilitator, audits) provided it is carried out correctly (e.g. the books are in order,debt collection is complete, facilitators are active in the role). Administration may be rewarded with up to 2% ofthe kelurahan grant amount; the percentage will be included as overhead in the Implementation Agreements and bepaid by the groups when they withdraw funds from BRI. Subsequently, administration can be financed from therevolving fund interest, as to be agreed within the KF. About half the interest accrued should be used formaintenance of local infrastructure.

Facilitators. Local organizations will be engaged a few days by the oversight consultant (see below) at the


program start to distribute circulars in selected neighborhoods; the circulars invite to a meeting to provideinformation about the program at the kelurahan. Then the communities will be assisted by

Kelurahan Facilitators (hired by the consultant for 24 months to provide initial information about theprogram and later, to assist with proposal preparation and to monitor implementation). Kelurahan Facilitatorswould come from nearby, and live in the districts or subdistricts they are to assist; they would thus incur lowtransportation costs and maximize their time in the field, and would not get a housing allowance. The facilitatorswill have a "social" background and training in facilitation; they may come from NGOs, Universities, localyayasans, women's groups, the Government's ongoing training programs. There would be initially one KelurahanFacilitator per kelurahan, 2 in the larger ones. They would be encouraged not to cover more than 12 groups, that isconsidered the maximum effective control span. All the facilitators will be trained in the program before theymobilize. Their pay rates are in the table above.

Group Technical Assistants for preparation and implementation of subprojects, can be asked by communitygroups to help. Assistants are expected to have expertise other than "social". Their fee would be agreed by thegroup and included in the proposal. The fee could be paid from the subproject funding as a percentage of thesubproject cost but groups will be encouraged to reward assistants in the form of sharing of profits. Assistants whoworked on proposals that are not approved, may not be paid, or be paid a minimum fee to encourage participation.

Community Trainee Facilitators, one for every 5,000 persons in the kelurahan, are to be recruited andtrained by Kelurahan Facilitators and paid by the oversight consultant for 6 months; if retained, they may be paidby the KF from accrued interest on loans.

Oversight consultants. Consultants and an initial minimum number of facilitators are hired under 9contracts for phase 1, kelurahans larger than 7,500 in northern Java (2 contracts for each of West, Central and EastJava and Jakarta and one for Yogyakarta, with an average of almost 150 kelurahans per contract) for 2 years, toestablish overview consultant teams and subteams to facilitate access to poor communities. The local subteamaddress would be stamped on the circulars to be distributed door to door. The process: calls for expressions ofinterest, shortlisting, encouraging firms to forn associations, selection on competitive basis of quality and price,training in the principles of the program including technical, environmental, any resettlement and procurementaspects, to conform with the program guidelines. The teams would include engineers, economists, small businessadvisors, to be able to handle the various aspects that may be involved in proposals; and a core number offacilitators, with social background. Additional expert services would be provided on a retainer basis (paid byoutput). Procurement and training is done from the Project Secretariat in Jakarta. For an eventual third year orcontinuation, the districts may procure the consultants.

The designated oversight consultant may have to return proposals to the facilitator/assistant requestingfurther work prior to releasing proposals for review by the KF. Upon KF approval, the OC, KF leader and lurahcountersign the proposals and the Implementation Agreements are prepared for signing by thePjOK and the groupmembers. The consultants are also responsible for random prior review of procurement of at least 5% of theImplementation Agreements, and for the project management information system and reporting in his area. The OCare subject to audit and shall keep records of their activities.

Transparency. Transparency is essential. Free information flow is to raise awareness of rights andresponsibilities of stakeholders, to minimize collusion or malpractice by localelites or borrowers. At the projectstart, a one page circular may be posted in public places in preselected poor neighborhoods, such as markets,public thoroughfares, schools, worship places, through religious organizations, localNGOs and agency staff. Thecircular will be distributed door to door by facilitators in the poorest neighborhoods. The circular encourageswomen to participate. Women and men shall have equal opportunity. Project procedures are emphasized infacilitator training. A Project Manual (this description including program start dates by location, plus standardforms, bookkeeping system and environmental and land acquisition/resettlement guidelines) will be available at thekelurahan and camat offices and posted on a Web site.

Discussions of proposals would be in the LKMD meeting room or other suitable venues. Groups can"defend" their proposals; all residents are free to participate in discussions at the proceedings; but only the


representatives of the RW/RTs will decide, and vote with open tallying if needed. Approved proposals have to beadvertised in the respective RT, and posted on public information boards one of which shall be located outside thelurah's office, as would the names of the group leader and members; and monthly, the groups' progress, paymentsand repayments in the case of the economic activities.

A Coordination Committee for Social Programs is being established at district level.Kelurahan Facilitatorsmay invite concerned citizens and groups to participate in meetings of this Committee, or to form an UrbanCommunity Forum at district or subdistrict level, to get involved in shaping and assisting community development.

Complaints. KFs with the OCs and facilitators are to establisha kelurahan complaint and suggestions box.If an irregularity is observed in the kelurahan and it is not addressed satisfactorily there, complaints and questionsabout the project can be directed to the facilitator or to the oversight consultant. OCs are required to suggest adispute settlement procedure, and to play an active role in arbitration if required. Complaints can also be sent to theP.O.Box.2222, Jakarta, and the [email protected] email address of the Project Secretariat; these addresseswill be publicized. Complaints will be recorded and reported by the OC, made available for public consultation,and followed up within a month. Anonymous complaints are acceptable, but may be given lower priority thansigned ones. The independent monitoring consultant is to act as "Ombudsman".

Awards and sanctions. The communities are encouraged to select and recognize the best performinggroup in a public ceremony. It is expected that the communities will raise to the challenge of empowerment thisproject provides, and that they will self-monitor and take the lead in enforcing proper conduct. However,prospective borrowers from an RW with a non-compliant group (e.g. group repayments not on schedule) should notbe eligible to borrow from the revolving fund. Facilitators will not be paid unless their performance is satisfactoryfor the group and "certified" by the oversight team. The oversight team should have no incentives for misconduct.To encourage continuous improvement in performance, a system of performance indicators will be established bythe Project Secretariat, to increase ownership and feedback and guide behaviors.

Independent monitoring. The Secretariat or the districts, will hire after competitive bidding, independent,local firms to survey and review progress, transparency, profiles of laborers and beneficiaries, etc. Monitoringfirms will also undertake a survey of initial conditions and surveys of project satisfaction among the communities.The local governments should participate in reviewing progress, as can journalists. Self monitoring by communitieswill be encouraged. Monitoring findings, and regular progress report findings, will be published in localnewspapers and discussed in Forum meetings.

Audits. Financial and technical (performance) audits will be performed as for all government programs,by BPKP on an anmual and sampling basis, of groups, KFs and consultants, the project BRI offices. The variousaudit levels will coordinate their sampling. Emphasis will be on due process and due diligence, and on performanceindicators as agreed. BPKP audit reports should be complete by December 30 for expenditures incurred theprevious fiscal year. The KF, OC and groups, and branches have to keep records of the activities for 3 years, andmake them available to independent reviewers if so requested.

Accounts of the UPK shall be audited yearly before June 30, by a licensed accountant from anotherkelurahan, paid by the KF.

Attachments: List of districts in year 1, and their implementation stagingCircular; Clarification for subproject eligibilityGroup composition checklistStandard forms (Implementation agreements, procurement forms, proposal forns)


General information not relevant to process in the communities

Executing Agency. Overall coordination, management, budgeting and monitoring responsibilities will bewith a Secretariat/PMU in Bappenas, under the Regional Development Deputy. The Secretariat will include stafffrom concerned agencies. A Coordination Committee, chaired by Bappenas, would resolve coordination problems.The Secretariat will have management assistance by a consulting firm, to train, review and supervise the oversightfirms and establish and keep up to date a computerized information system. The Secretariat will also disseminateinformation to local agencies and train agency facilitators.

Level II agencies will select a PjOK, to be located at the kecamatan level. Selected government facilitatorswill get the same training as the consultant facilitators.

Funding process. The channeling BRI office will be informed of the amount of the kelurahan grant; whenconstituted, the KF will open a Kelurahan Forum Account and relevant signature specimens are recorded in theBRI office. This shall receive funding after the PjOK endorses the documentation from the groups and forwards itto the KPKN, that in turn requests BI to transfer the required amount to the BRI office Kelurahan account. Theinitial transfer is expected to be 40% of the kelurahan grant; a second transfer of 40% would follow when theaccount balance is 10%, the OC and KF are satisfied with the use of earlier funds and with the justification offurther funding, and the PjOK endorses it. The final 20% will follow in the same way. The BRI office can disburseto the group against approved subproject documentation (agreement or claim amounts) after verification ofsignatures. It will have a record of credits and debits, and verify that the latter do not exceed the former; it will alsoverify that it does not disburse more than was approved for each subproject (debits should be identified by date andwithdraweT). Records shall be made available to monitorers and auditors upon request. BRI may invest partiallyany balance and keep interest it may accrue, to compensate for operating costs incurred, but at any time shall havesufficient liquidity to pay claims within the balance amount. Periodically BRI would provide disbursementstatements by kecamatan and kabupaten (may be province and kelurahan) and send a statement to the ProjectSecretariat and DG Budget, Ministry of Finance.

Each Kelurahan Forum account will be funded as follows: the initial 40% transfer, to comprise 10% of thekelurahan grant amount funded by GOI, and 30% from the Special Account in Bank Indonesia, from the WorldBank credit; subsequent transfers, 100% from the SA. This results in 90% financing from the credit. In turn, theDG Budget asks for replenishment of the Special Account from the World Bank.

Payments to the oversight consultants and the national management consultant will be by Jakarta'sBIIKPKN, upon authorization of the Project Secretariat.

PjOK shall have a budget provided by the national budget for this program.


URBAN POVERTY PROJECTCASH FLOW SCHEME AT KELURAHAN

GrantAgreement

Completion|

First Fund RequestRequest Request

C opete Null

Transfer of l | RequestFunds to BR, incomplete

+ comp~c lete Epense \<noneep~~~~~~~nn

| equesfo| |Withdraa positive _/ alance \

op * | | balance A KPKN

| unacceptable /

FCorrectR e iBRI Balance

Report

4acceptable

Withdrawal Expensefrom BRI Report

Tnmissing ,>4 million / Bank < millionBalance

ColletedoFe s

available

Payments Receipts Booeepin


Attachment

Clarifications for eligibility of some types of subprojects

Both small public infrastructures and economic activities are allowed, but some types of subproject requirespecial attention.

a) Public infrastructures are such as under KIP, and can be done by the community or by contractorscontracted by the community/group following shopping procedures. Water supply installations would in principlenot be eligible, given that the PDAMs would have to be involved in the process to make sure that water is available,pipes are the right size and location, etc.; however, RTs could use grant funding for partial payment of standardconnection fees.

b) Some environmental improvements, such as composting initiatives, can use grant funding only for thecapital cost, not for the subsequent operation; O&M should be viable without subsidies. If this condition cannot bemet, then the capital subsidy should not be provided. This should be verified by the facilitators/oversightconsultant. The grants can cover regreening of parks or areas for public use provided the land is made available.The environmental guidelines in the Project Manual have to be followed.

c) Proposals for agriculture on idle urban land have to attach a written contract with the land owner, showinghis permission for use of the land, the allowed period, and any agreed fee, and signed by the parties and witnessedby the camat (to avoid the land user later claiming land rights and the land owner claiming rights to the outputproceeds). Rotation of land users may be encouraged, and means found to avoid current users not caring aboutdepleting the soil, not rotating crops or not fertilizing as necessary for sustained use.

d) Community housing and urban renewal proposals, have to follow kotamadya land use plans, and have afull financing scheme presented at the discussion of proposals at the Kelurahan Forum. Menpera's scheme may befollowed. The Bappedas II may be requested to review the izins (prinsip and lokasi) and to revoke expired ones;this could free up land and could lower land prices.

e) Land acquisition. No proposal should require more than minimal land acquisition, and none will involveinvoluntary resettlement. The project's land acquisition and resettlement guidelines are in Annex. Records of anyland acquisition and people's consent will be maintained by the Administration office/Treasurer of the project in thekelurahan. The project funds cannot be used for land acquisition. Guidelines in the Project Manual have to befollowed.


KELURAHAN COVERAGE

A: SUMMARY BY PROVINCE ON JAVA

Phase 1: NORTHERN JAVA, BANDUNG, YOGYAKARTA AND MALANGKelurahans >7,500

PROVINCE Tk II Kecamatan Kelurahan Grants # Kelurahan 1995 Popul.# 1/ Rp bn Facilitators Millions

DKI Jakarta 5 43 249 224 487 7.71West Java 15 192 542 203 587 7.94Central Java 17 153 174 55 181 2.11East Java 17 191 242 98 286 3.71Yogyakarta 5 47 98 30 103 1.21

All 59 626 1305 610 1644 22.7First phase, to start in January/February 1999 - details overleaf

Phase 2: Eligible kelurahan, to start about September 1999

NORTHERN JAVA, BANDUNG, YOGYAKARTA AND MALANGKelurahans <7,500

PROVINCE Additional Kelurahan Grants 1995 Popul.Kecamatan Rp bn Millions

DKI Jakarta 0 16 1.6 0.09West Java 11 400 40.0 2.06Central Java 2 569 57.9 2.37East Java 18 528 53.8 2.10Yogyakarta 0 27 2.7 0.15

All +31 1540 154 6.7

"SOUTHERN" (rest of) JAVAPROVINCE Tk II Kecamatan Kelurahan Kelurahan Grants 1995 Popul.

# 1/ <7,500 Rp bn MillionsWest Java 11 87 292 265 35.5 2.05Central Java 18 168 570 384 94.4 3.42East Java 20 142 498 403 68.3 2.75

All 49 397 1,360 1,052 198.2 8.2-

Note: Kelurahans also comprise urban villages, as classified by BPS.


B: SUMMARY by KELURAHAN SIZE

KELURAHIAN Very small Small Medium Large Very large Total w/o Totalvery small

Population <7,500 7,500- 15,001- 22,501- >30,000thresholds 15,000 22,500 30,000Grant /kelurahan RplOOm Rp250m Rp500m Rp750m Rpl,250mAverage/capita 22,000 Rp23,500 27,300 28,750 29,200 Rp26,000"Northern Java"# kelurahan 1,540 2,8451995 Population 6.7 m 2.9. mGrants RplS4.Obn Rp764.3bn

"Southen Java"#kelurahan 1,052 266 28 130 4 78 1,3601995 Population 4.7 m 2.7 m 2.1 m 0.3 m 1.1 m 3.6 m 8.3 mGrants Rp2O5.2bn Rp66.6bn Rpl4.Obn Rp7.5bn Rp5.Obn Rp93.lbn Rp198.3bn

Off-Java# kelurahan 2,031 609 114 35 28 786 2,8171995 Population 7.3 m 6.2 m 2.1 in 0.9 in 1.1 m 10.4 in 17.7 mGrant cost Rp203. lbn Rpl52.2bn Rp57.0bn Rp26.3bn Rp35.0bn Rp270.5bn Rp473.6bn

Indonesia Total# kelurahan 4,623 1,635 408 168 188 2,399 7,0221995 Population 18.7 m 16.8 m 7.5 m 4.4 m 7.9 m 36.7 m 55.4 mGrant cost Rp462.3bn Rp408.7bn Rp204.Obn RpI26.0bn Rp235.Obn Rp973.9bn Rpl,436.2bn

Shaded: Phase 1

Off-Java and Total Indonesia shown for information only.

Indonesia: Urban Poverry ProjectTADFTAR KELURAMAN SASARAN MP TAHAP I

RUPINS1, ust, 11, KM 1, ut. It. K�..0-4 3umrAH INw, vau 13, JUMLAH INLLUKAkIAN tmtua LAN U.- I

MR-)

1. W JAKAtCTA INM6 51 170,2m,000 Ljr.QzAmady*RE�_B"mll 1,199,47Z 5-it Lwl1.1 KOM-clyaJakma 401 36,000,OW 1, Kalliderel - 4 KLhNUFK 36,1111 1,�:W.uuq

j. rancor- 32�548 1,2wm MALAKAJAYA 44,5521 1,25O.UvqI L)UKtN ilUA /W. ]EYEKES 3 [,�43 # 44" �(1731 t 1.2bulLUM

,2 FENGADFOAN 24,1091 [,-,u,uw JTWAUUNUAN 29,426 7 8941 i,zw,uuul

3 KAWAJA Yl 17,649 WV, lbu,wA - 3 1 UuKtN �w I J9,259i 1,z5U.

4 FANCOPAN i 22,729 750,-DM 4S,915 f 1.250,uoq2, Crm-gk.m IK794

i!LhN4lF.AKtNU, MALKA I 4.�,_,Zv 1,250,UOCI 8. �Ciram103,104 C iuuuuw 118

1 LENTENQ AGUNC, 45,17� 2 1CENUKARENG TORUR -------- 46M 1 - 1 1,KELAPADUAWk:LAN 25,9

2 LIPLUAY, i Y,� ovu.uuv 3 i KAPUK 52,940 I,Z*U.ULM i 21CIRACAS 39,8 7,4w,

! HUAYA 24,515 i IOU-uutm I usu 31,492 1 l,Zbu,Uuq4 CIGANJUR 500:'uuu M gG U AMA& L9,314 11-ili ou fw,

3. 5,DDQ,000 3. Gnc.I Peumbunm 174,494 6i 5,MOgq 9� Mak-r

.LW,DM I "jK%JWL. 29.237 f W,UU,4 i � �KASXK 29,m t /W.Viq

ZI 10MANU, 36,5B 1,2 US% 42,606 1,7.bo,wq

A 1) IAKA 1 45'"ul �i IANJUNG LiUREN LrARA 2&21i ,w,OUq i13 1 PINANG I IZ816 L - �

.4 UROGOLSELKr-AN- 1 47,2881 _.-LAMBAK BMEU- 34,34i I,ZW,VA4 LirINA44U MtLAYU 40,065 1,250

31WIJAYAKUSUMA

4.�M 6,TANjUNGDtJRENb=.AlA 22,369 I 75,J*U 71 1. I --k%U tmq

zl'utu- -!S�M&m

2 N" PANLiPRAPATAN (50,WD 4. 'irstabom 226,262 23,719 250,0001

3 BANGKA 22,163 IIKALLANYAR 28,M 'WIMM i I LhUbK 250.OEXA;P'� I, ziuvxi u t� fou'umv Ij41 MUNJUL 25O.UE

OW,WLI I1'IBAMSUAPUS 13,�44 ZOU.ULM

Itu'537 4, 5, 2,10u"a f 1W.UMN IibiL 10,339 250.wq

I MANcrjARAi 41,244i 1,250,0M 51JEMBATAN BESI 27,576 i (W.904 i 171 FONOOK KANGON

2 butul UVFJ 43, 1 i,zw,uuu O,ANUM jj,jao i'Zou'uuta I I

3 MLN TENU UALAM 49,799 1250,900 __rMMtIAEAN UMA 20.256 tQ0,0001 ; 1.5 Kotimadys Jakaft Utart IAA9 271 2611%

i,zou,uvu 3!TAMBORA 13,280 Zbu,QUCI if. i Kelapa G 97,11 31 3

y1rL&WAN 3 IA" l,ZbU,uukM ,I llrbufflm�� _u i

6- -Ciludak 115,6461 C 3,500,ODD III ZlKw-kpA uAuuwj timux I 40,01JI I

L LLUAY, LSULUb LY ---- 7M-,= 5� .Keb.. NF.R 148,M 61 4,Z3%UUUI 1 JjKtLAFA(,AULN(jBAKAI; z7,z3t 1 �W,2�MR 5, a 11 bu,� i I KEHON JLKUK 37,202 I.W.W.Uuto 1 I I I - I

... T_poj�� AN Z-41 bLq w,uuu 2lKEVOYWIJ-rARA 29.064 1w,vtm 2. lpadmmtm I I . . .34,73ui llzwlv� Z7,,W4 50.0001 , IIANCOL I 3, 16L I *w.UUUj

4SUKABUNUSELATAN 20, 5WOQq II ZIPADENIANGANBARAT 637,593 I.Zbu.vjLq7- P 4, 5,000,mu

ISSIU41 - 167,, 31FADEN 1,250.UUUI52 .. 7 1,250,1710 b KtLArA L)UA 1_� Ow,0001 ! - I

.2:FLAUUNAN I :3. I anjmg rnok 274.;54

57 1). I A." ban 58,1481 5 I.MUUUN - I I I ANJUNU PRIUIL 27,255 t

114wl� i tANGKI 11,7.241 Z*ULXAV Z; PAPAN 26,944 1 - fw,uLM

2 i KEAGITNOAN I 13AWANO 59,03Q 1 1.Zbu.Uvq

I 1^1701 MKUT� � 12,4321 zu'u'umv 4,bVNILKJAYAi �5,�JD I I,Zbu.UUUI29,1131 100,000 4, TA �6"Os 1,250.uuul

2 Pt FUKANGAN SELA I-AN I*u,uvu 3 NDOWn 49,156 1 1,2w.3 ULUJAMI 31,0771 1,zw i4 PErUKANQAN UTAKA jb,�fl W�O�M TP.1m.-h 157,669 51 4 Cili.d.&

I I JATI PULE) J�,� i ,4 - I 47,41Z l,zw,vVA

1:04,!N77991 )TA SAMBU UTARA 26,469 75"'u"', :5EMPERDAMAI 60,374 1.zbu.I ;�� MA I./*U.tjuu j SLIPI 5 - nMUR -27,359 1W.Vuq2 fou't 53% JOVIV44 4;bVKA PUKA Z4,711 tbu,

3KAREr 21,1191 5DO, i 75u,uuq4 flUN I UK 250,000 f

D. KCM 125,1961 611 3 I

91,1221 .4 2,750,OW MM UrARA Jbv�l t W,VW4 .3. ranlannlm 161,9% 4� 4,13MOMI

37,10ZI llzwl� L:b;mRugmqa- ZZ,421 ] I ,=.ULM 1, PANJARINGAN I,zw.uuq

2 PtllxjVAN sonm 3,JOGLO 22,3531 I *uu.uuqI

j KXANtA I PtLA Ouu,uvu 4, KtMuANuAN uTARA 21,036 b 3!KAPUMMUA] ZOU.ULM

4 UUNUN(J 15,7031 wo,wo - TNIMM A ELAMN 07- bOU.ODCI . 41PLUIT i 1,250.=6 KEMBAMAN Stj_Al� 14- ZbO.Wq I

1.2 Kotamdyx J.k.na P-.t 1- 927,3711 33 16. Koi 161-'74&1 51

$1,144i 4. Z.M,000 1. 4 Kotmm.dya Jakarta r.", 1- ploom i6A 35-,6641 -T,25umI CIDENG WO.DVO 1. MatraMan 146,775 5: 4.750,00% 2: F.2 PETOJU$ELATAN 21.3301 - - SM.UUU --- I 21,2621 3,RAWABADAKSELAIAN Z4,J-1 W,=

16,4211 -2 PAL MhKILM 19,8781 DOC 4, TUGU UTAKA 4b./UYI 1,dbu,�

4 FtlUjU V !AKA 21,6401 buu,c jJ.4U11 I'ZO ATAN 15.4961 500,4 U FAN KAYU SELATAN 33,2961

2. S...h B�� 4. 5 UTAN KAYU tTrARA 39,1321 i ODC -R-,.'glZa. �TA51lis'N" I,Zbu,uuu I I

2 FAbAX BAKU boo, r-ra�negm 256,4911 7: 6,7WM JUMLAH

fbu,Uw I KAMFUN(j MELAYU_ 27�0501 75T= Pmd

3 BIDARA CINA

j. K.m.y.,an 154,241 _YB"m __ TIU� � 44.1"i 1.zbu,= 1. 1 KOWMadya Jakarta Selatan f,i UUNUNU bAMAKI SFLA IAN 1 26,8931 750, __TrMMT9GlMSAR_UTAlCV 23,-4W -75T= I.z Kotamadya Jakarta Pusat r 247-,945; 40i 36,000=

22,819, ------ 7507= 6,CIPINANU SESAR 11 and r 1, 1 9 9-,4 7 2r -4 9 i- --c C, 2 5 T M30,M] I,Zbu. __T_O 11301111 1.25Dw L.Rummadyajakarta limurP i 1,675,771f b

____CTARTANJXNU_ Lorlomm39,0(A 1,250,000 3. F.I. (;.d..g 238X7i 6 6,250,000

I &AYU P 5O.D821 1,2bu,m -------- Toiir 5.9BT,11512089,DD3, 4 22WA -4 513351 1,25u,=

t KWITAN(j 17,8ZI! 45.493i __T= M, _lI.JAWABARAT2 22.-Y" 750.OOC __TT._r'FW p.t- Ikk..i 1- O"50,

KENARI 14,799 i

3 PASEBAN 27,0021 KRG- 1. ;T..b.n

HUNGUK ^39v 7bUUUU 6 45.-Zbl UAMUR

19,DUZI OW.OwT.-CF.P. � .. t, 74439, -y- fa"m 4K,...t J.ti 171,443� ---- TIMFKAR5AFJ 19,062! buulom

IC EMPAKA PUTHi HAMA I 31,317 i7wow I KRAMAT)ATT__ V,V421 12 LE:MFArA FUUH TIMUR 13,4151 250.= � 'ALL � OANU 16 5'j _V,� 115M.000----- --- 750,= 1:

3RAWASARJ 24,1071 H 27,6471 ibu,DOC WANASARI Z7,�4u; fw.UuO4 16.12T I 5 NAU

71,997i 4 _f;l� 40,194 7 2 W, 03 q U L I J A Y A 16,6401

IKLbUN blKlH ILILITAN 41.1211 l.ZOU,

/�Uuuu3 CIKIMI ------ 2M-,OW 37 s., Reb. 104,908 41 3 I'SUKARAYA

4 FLUANWAAN 30,516i I PEKAYON 33.236i VuKARANUKOTA 13.�631 250.UQU

1 RI 2&821 � 7 kkLANUAbIM 21 �631 fbu,uuu

7 T.nah Ab..g i WI"f �5 4 19.61 1 iIKAMPUINU BALI 201411 4 GEDORG- 26,240i ih

llr:llllll KIN 28.315 i I bu,uuu -m .633,C,,i3N M, 39,142� _f, 2 182,457� 6 . 2 MEKARMUK-n 9313 Z50.000

MOM N 30,98C 46 ��4 1,250,uu 3 SIMPANUAN 9.0481

-- IURE F I tNUSIN -- 73-.5 70 lbu.000 14 G681 ZSD.=

3 FeNurum[NGAN 44.622' 35,429' 2 1.000,000

4 s3wwo I BABELAN KOTA_________WM ------- 50TOOOI iv�K -u i AKUNOTIMUR2KAMPUNG RAWA 35,882 WA IbKAIL

37.974 1,250,Wo


PRC�1��5 M 11, KIMP luan U, N KELURA aH

7, I WIV IrAL'UMBUNSARI M.7721 1 250.i ZIPASIK _706r-7 -- 5ww

11,20611 250,000 1 I JNUUAYJAII I lu.8�2� 250,00(AIUAYA 11.206i 250,000 --------- 33;3" 5! 1,250, 4, KARAWANG WETAN 21, 2 OD-MO

I lt&AK I 25U.UUCI 5 i KAFLAWANU IkULUN-fR-ou-w--9v-.-IQ0 1 z5u, IT-3or- -500-100IT 1140,15 -,W,Mo 12!NANqGEWMU ------------ 9,W, -61mumw-3�PAKAINSARI �UASARJ -- 2TM3 i 5oo,ow

A SA 41CIRJUNU31CII51NONC, i Rgd-

3KO i 1,KEUASDENG2; REGASD

-NJUANG I 46,27 I IIkUIA HATU- 13,501SIAKAJAYA Z7,3 tw'uQQ FAWILARAN 4� Jmm.

iliCIOMAS ---------- r-350 ltpuc.i sd.u. - J 7 i 4,5wOOG

IJAKA bAMPURNA i 52,1 1KA� � i 37,626 12.JCi- � � 7,6541 11 25KAMULYA ZU,4611 5Q01WJ 1 111SENUUNUAN - 7,6541 i 2 5LO

4 kKUAMULYA 14,27 i5 21, M�simpy. 13,662� 6� I IWTA6� WMA 16 IJUSAL.AK 12,8451 250,UUCI 1 2 LEMAHABWG7 ZiBAKTUAYA-- 47,056F- 1'zw.uuq i

-fMk KAKJAYA 7 T.I.kis.3Bk- 41SU FLYA

I&N J 1 J-%624 �JKALJHA U2.p N"AMINAN b[SUKAMAJU 33,6741 l.z5u.uoq S. VJRi3 B UVINU MtN I tNU I IKANTUN�KERJA

tKUAHAYU 92, 250,221II I L)bF'UK 29,126F I 75U,UM 1

13SPANJANu JAYA 24,31Z 1 21 RAMMAPAN JAYA -7059� 5ou Om II. 6 p7 BUJUNU KAWALUMIJU 69,27 1,250.0 iPANG P.MJAYA 750,00C4� UKA DAMAI-47B--m, Gb"g 1 5 5 1 i 2 Bi I UNU JAYA

I 48,418F 51 rlznmFI-51IF-- 2wl=3�P� AN i 14 517 250 000 -:- -15T.=4 2TAKUALAM

3. CipmaIK-MA MMI -,W,Uuv 16.1 Cm- I uni FAT2 LIABAINU I hNUAR '3'440� I'M= i I I ru(ju StLATAN 2�CIREUNDEU

i c3 NAWAR kSARUILLUNFUl-UNt, 5LZ" Li Pl�,ANOAN

1,944LIBUKUY UNV

16,636� W0.000')A

,I LbAKI

4j"KA4A 22.052! 500,0003 JA It iKKAA4AT 2 �051 750,000

I MS101 klTIAM 20,2421- i7. P. M,7 -kr 16,9501 i

4U811 1,2M=, 31JAMUMV- 14.036i------------- MOT ------ 75TUM Z4,3

4Z�91 1 2W ULIU 37CIMPAEUM i �IJALJNUOltIAKJAMUKTITMEKARSARI

S. J.M. 33,963i 31 750.UM --- ,.3-TTSffZUNUNUb dak A-JA;mm 9, LISA

nmumi 13.622i zso-,= L'IL)KAN,J-UWN-

4!lVNUV&AKbN20.; D-.Za 500,00(

2 Fl..51)AN LU,4871 kV-" 7,971LtJ &M3f l5u= I KE

2 CURUG KULON 3,8511 25UOM3cKA

7. P.-lAkiANUNti 25u'um

tum

2 LOPAN

T 3 UNYURGSAWAH 4 LIfiANUU2, C'l- 31,761' 0 IIDAYEUH 250,000 � 7 I 5 hhKANU I 1

2�. Bp.g �d. -TrID-1-T i1 13,19 1; 250.00( 7 LON I AK BAKU

Z!kKIUJAYA 9-90ii 25TOM W'SUMUKyhLUN(JYUNG 9�6271

L LI uiuu 8'2�w �bu'000 'NU PUNVOK TERONQz U I tuKhull ZbO.00V3 PU

IVAIJUK i

MUKA�4

3:Bhjl 26.399i 750,00(

I ANY

-41.0� 1 PA ALANJA-n LAALA5"00 -2-t-ANDUC- 8.740i - -26a.-OOC

-250-OW6. 3t

IANSARI

zsnmMr, btLA IAN

7-999i --- 2sno fEENI) BARAT

-- fTLA)-- 2SO.MC

7-P.�,MK JAYAN P


PKCFIINSI, U.-filT. )U&Mm-&�. I jumck. K-...twKtLUKAHA'q P-nd.dk, KOI. tiantuan KELURARAN

10.3601 -- 250"um 1 JIUWUNU JAYA --------- m-Im Ovu,� K.Jaks-

I 19,93 AKSAN Izbo,m 2 KEShNVEN

8,487 i J,SUKAPURA -T---WouP... ic 60,101 6

81,2521 1 1 KUNCIF-" IZB- 3 750,OWi 1,4331 LINLKUKLW 7.785 250.00q j I.JAUASATRU Zbo,OUQI

9,4871 I 250,000 - M DhVLARA F'INANG -8,810 1 9,538

3 c 7,992 INAINO 1 10,017 7 zw,um3,1W /*U.Uuu Ipp ANGAN 7,!,39

3 C�M GN 9,1811 250.000 �NUNGUANGAN UTARAI, 13,090 U. 13 Kab.patm 112 37,2MOoq-- TT.MDTRG-- 8,9081 11. lcip.,.y

7 SEPUR 9,723, zzi,uuu I U Ka-ni Tentah RI 250,wq

& BABAKAN IIKARANrj-nMUR 2� TI - � 2 ISAIRUIMAAIFIH 7,716 2*0,um

9 P.-XNAtLAfiAN ilbbul zw,uuu ZIKARANUMULYA -- TM, --- M DANG 12,897 z5u.wqBAHAR I M3 25 1 4 GUNUNGLEUITK

31FUNDOK U'Viq I 9 44i zou.VuLqEk.ZOTim.r 63,o7a I cr -"wam 4!pONDOKPUCUW- 13,901 zbu,ouq I 1 3 btKANUMbKAR 8'm Zw.uLm

SLANG 23 7861 9,.,z MOM47--�,-6,MANGGMUHARJA 9 2bu,;��w - 336

IT I I bumut"Atu 10,995 bu.24--.- KXTUEKRM L4,LL41 ZZU,UW -- 3QM 7 2

250,WD 14,196 glq i 2. �Mmjmlsya

TM- 25 250,4-B.V, ut." 95,4981 7 ZIZ5010013 �JLAKANUAN UIAKA i 16,L62 10,73-6

1 T?.ljALGUNDlJ. 19,7711 I 13-79 12,213 250,2 11,0191 250,000 KEREU 6,466 i 4iBIRU 250,

_7MULuff- 1 ;J,431 525U.UuLjr, 3,buKAMAJ

-- CHF 1 13,5201 ZOU'UUU 17 CIPADU JAYA lu'aw r zMUMT-73' ii-ILUAK' 10,ml 250,000 II a TPADAULUN ;dw.

0 I-IMAtti-AX I zbu,u22 Uri I 53,2S4 5 LOKANJERUK --- Trw z

JANAI-ibAKU i 16,950 f Suo,ow bpju 1 8,.,63 250 1i : 13,M I

01 Selatsn 35,UUI j "OW. YAR1 -,- I -'�AUNUWWAN I 7,Y62 HARAT

bAlUlUL15 . I 3�SELMWANGTAVA i 15,4713 zou,uw I 4�SELACAU 9,235 250.UUUI4 CIPAKU Z;,432 i 250,000 1. 10 Kabpam lndmms" I 101,229 11 21750,OM

I -rZ,426 -L-,OAM �4. iPaCeti 12,426 1 25 1 MARLTYTJ� ZbO.0oulV

01, ZZ *5 Ou.. 0-M 2. H.,.q-fis 91ml 1 1 256,OM 5. Pmh11 9,9481 1 2:50.a :FlLll'AllU

T7,752i 6i Z,00(,00001-MAtt bAXhAL 1614"I z I

Z KhL)UNliBADAK 24,915i ts,3:uw zw 4 CIPEDES

I �uu 73014 KEE)UMIWAKINUIN 2: 6� Ciml.n 34, SU rADANMI 7,93,! 4. f.dm..y. 16,3731 7.16 CIBADAK 11,257 ....... I I LZ&lAttMr-%AX

11.9 928,2181 71,&7 4yzl 4

_I 24,5341 fbu,ow 25Ci

-7-BARmum- I'A 6. ��i "24i .1 2 CILILIN

LMUKUL 19,139i .0 UDU14,4791 250,

-"w

112,385i 6,--T73uw YA15 I II FASIR JAYA 21,746� I IIKAKANIIAMPbLKIDUL 9,618 250,0ZIATAKE 17,5471 i !

21.250i 3. Ostbar-Z &0231 11ATIBAKANQ BARU I 'AYAtW

19,0001 i

MAN[S JM 13.020! K..d le,�j 1 25 W 500,000

WE7AN 1 25 2w,000

It. tl K.b.p.tm Sbang/- 13F,463 M 4,750,1. �P--.km 19.2b3 21 750,000

1 1 MULYASARI 9,5454 CIPONDOH 15,4W 500,0(M !

---- FOR19TFCkWXD MRX-- 1.501 I 250,000 10,723 9,706T 25o,wo

9.01j� 2. f ft.k..&Sorm 20,9941 I7-CIPONDOH INDAH 10,4691 I i rUSA&AKA I V 12,4631 25

'FUhAF.AJAYA 2bo, 14,3081 250,000T-r,T.-d-.z ---------------------- T7;5� , - i /aU,DW

I SUD;,MA;� BARAT 9.411, 40v,uuv 3. 250

bLLAIAN JU.436 4 2,

:�:T� WILAN UTARA Wu,

4 SUMMARA JAYA 12,872 8,370 1 2 500,0-T-9� � 13.025 Z50,000 3 BALEEND

0 FARUNU SERAD 10,3817 TAJUR WU 5. O... 51 1

IISUKAMANDIJAYA 20,34621C SEMUIRANG ?A(,ERAN

31CIASEM I LNGAIJ in,41j"b �-21-0121 9!716i 4 ICLASEM BARU 250-.m

10" (9-- Tusul 9 k,", �2 41

4 BXTUTEPETC- O'y4b, e.. �!50-.ng 73,041 51 -I�M-,MI I uGADuW 15,368 5OTM

T§vl� -MD.W 21SOKLAI BIRU WETANCINUNUK

-- Fumx- 10383SEEERDUNG-- - 11,839:

10,971 - 2w.000

214.285 m i 58,168i 4 1.5wmaP. -:1 y �11 47.792i 1: NAH 107.059 i !)UUI rESAMBI 10.055i - 2 bu:w

3 DKAJAT 2�. 71 T241 s

4-CIM EJAYA -- T-44q- 250-,DDO 4'bUNYAKA'jl

35,3121

-- TZERM 5=1-1911KIVAN- 61LI 250,012 33!48bl

I PMUK -- Tr62T- 25CFOOO 3.

-5MMO 2:KALUA(j

KATIMUNG-

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 30p

PRoPTNST.-D--ffTrlC"---.t -1 V.u 11, K....tan, XHKELUKAHAN KtLUKAH" 1-Ye-naWuki-KU I tiantuar

1 5511 1366.W T--Band..& Wtm 37,507 2 1,000,M -fl '� .,g.-- T'CIMPTM EKAR g,00 I SARI 28,809 i 750.00( i 28,7521 i

2 CIBURUY II,-,471 250,OW 696 ztu'uutj I A(jUUAFU 1 9,1231 Z�U,uuu 16,424�- 17,6211 1 500,

D KhKIAJAYA i 7j790 250.0(X -;O"M2; KEBON PIMNO -T4-,60

26r,W-z.h.yu 75.239 41 2,OM,00 31MEELDEKA 546 i 250,M 1 9,487� 250,0IbUr,AMhNAK 16,9451 1 500,000 -I UAVA&AN C" S 13V

750,000W-M g J(.k, -- 52.557

UxtiEULIS 11,87i JUMLAH----- TStJKALLJYlJ F-ddk 1 Kel. i BantuTn

7,648I BANJARAN WETAN 13,ju5l T--Zsnm 4 ClUAL)UNU2 I 9, /�,uw I Hokasi r 6,---3.ClAPUS i Y,J..f I 1 250,000 nyi.g Kid.] i 71,�Yj 5 Bekasi

I I 1CICAVAS 13,3(01 I2� Dy�hk.lt 51.1 ! W5w,000 1 30,50010uqT-CA-lZGKUAjqUWhlAN lu,� zbu,� i-I !JISUrA� U I 113601-i Z LAIIUKUANL. KULUN 13,7131 i 500.000 14iSUKAPAL)A 1 15,258 I"dDuuu12,JJ4 42,7011 291 8,150,I I 250,000 ��=ugp�,en zwang 5,25u,ou

IVAYbU�ULQI 15,816i I # � 749 �415 13,250,Wqi 73,Wly 5 KOtiMadya TwWntng7--- TTCIC?amum - --------------- Rm I 250,M11111.1023iAFjU.. 8,138f 1 1 M,000 -- Z75UZMmaoupaien incremayu

w,uw 21 B"AKAN S(JRABAVA---,--T4,7W 1 25 11 =r I -3 KEHON JAYA" - I I

24 C' -- y.. 49 1,250,000 csEJECAPURA I SW,UL-Allll.lziKaoupatenBandiuN� -- 1,4Z3,5151112 37,250,UUQIF-PADASUKX- 1.1B, L t o ri 12,4541 1 250,00(11111.14 Kolamaaya tSaMung r 1.4zblZ,L(lJhUNYfNlj 20,Z5 . I -3 CIMENYAN 3'slill 250,000 12.1gt .. agg.1 1,750,ODIIF--- ---- To-gF- I 3.229.4Z4 L113UKIAL 8,4031 Zt-U,UUOl IIKACAPIRIKG zw,uuta I

I 14,933 202-311N. golmg- Z9,538( Zi zu,� J UUMUKUH 1 14,246 49,250,rANUALLNGAN ! 14,1 15,3;L -M"w ii-E �. i 65'awl 7 -- pI -4� F 7som

� -AH I TKE901rMDANC, 9,0515 9- 19,1014 21 500,6m6181NONU 14,254 luMAKJu Y�12 [ I 2tV

2TNZA.P,.h 9,86T I f MMO --- 7,ZAMOTC-- 9,5521__LNtAKI,AIAYA 9,867 1 2_

1 62,170 61D3iRt 21 500,000 PALEDANG 7,500 8,6921 11 250

1 6 ONUM)ANG 8,6921 1 250.2 T IALUAK 3�MALAOAR

�!i �uo I :vuta I 11PENYANUMNUAN 1 7.294 M.'p-h 57,7931 4 ; t,Z50,000 3; FURANWA 14,733 I..:ULN4 I

I ME 21,1471 7 *w,uuu 6,Z:IJAL.RA 9,6451 PIXAKUAAb� "'., 8,7071 1 M,0002sulaw L EFIRI 8.707� 250,0003LAC,ADAR 10.012 . C N73. 250,QW 14.; "!4 RAHAYU I 12,411-� --- Zsnm K 7,962 250 5. ISO' 10,159 11

UIA I LUL 8,6 %OJA3D K.12P..g 49,001 j 5 1�,-%,000 3 ANLUL lf),U64

IYAlAkAN(j 8,33 4iC]GEROLENG I 0002LILAIMPEN1 �LSEWU 1

��NUAUIJAN M501 2M-,CW 6,PASIRLUYU-SUKANHM � � iM46i :ebv,uuu o.t.. BRtm.e 1- 1 66,0431- 41 -1,06,W

LINMIN 45�kik- 58,019i LiKA &AbhFUHAN 11,4721

4 ilsmooo KANU ALNYAR 9,6761 IKARANUASEM 500.000IM AL�&.-AN 25,076i LU,1241I . 13,JZ9 iKAUMAN 11,4301 25D,UUQ2150JUNULOA 13.261 250.000 4�KARA5AK I 250,QOQUT--' 4 22,397i -- 30T=4 EUUN'j 9 92 250,GUG

LALY.EK &ULON 9754� Z�,WU El bf jAi 69,� 4 1 F..W-z 1- 215,755[ 171 5,750,000P-M..j

32 P.,o.p..g 39,196, 4i Z�BABAKANASIH 14,278 i 250,004 i L FELUIAN 22,204 1 500,00016.111i � M'O-,Cw 3; KOPO ig,146, - - NtiKA 10,3141 ZbU.9.6927--- ---- 250-,CW 15,289[ i I- - 5 15,185 i 5onm

-TsUGTRWMUU- 25nm4 �,A UWANlil 9.0301 25UOW T7-Mimloa Kid.i 18,52,5[ 1 1 TBOTOITGRAMN- 9,776�

i YLttUN LFUA 18,5251 12. T.... 37,285! 31 1,000,0008.510i i I -7 - ZSU-= Is. B.b.k Cipi, 64,1801 S!

IBABAKAN liKABUNAN34 P. gp-k ------ frr7y--T-- T55-.w ---

4tVNbAKI 10.712 1 ',VAKU� Y U U 1AKA JT9,7911 i 250,GGO 4i 7,6181 47,796ir3wlr- "", --- qTBlF- 2m.uuO

tO,7391 1 250-.=19. B.od..g K.1- 55,1C 3jMOGA

1. N.k.- OOTM I UBUNIU �4 KUN(,PKIN(,ITSOLA 7 4jWA 7:114611123.430t (50'am 2 CUEFAH �341 500,605� 250. 3 CIGON EWAK KALER ll,,6407241 251: i4. Rnd.do.gk.1 --- 25,49512 756,GM

23.335i 750,OGO --- 4-GEMPoL SARI 250 tiRANoUDONGKAL-4 SARIJADI 9,424 D,QM

20 Cm.d.,64,3771 4 1 1,46ffw 14,w 1 1 ZDU.UtA

Z�U,uuu WIX11 1, IURWUSAKI 7,613 f 250,GUCAN IAPANI [hNlAM 9 469 buu,uut 21pupwo

17.046 SUCFM buv,uuu4 S �A A j6l A.P.1g.

21. A,u.-ik 37,6W 3 KI 1

--- ,-MX� KULON 13,2051 Zb A'l�N 20.049i 5 ---- 7-rMRUKLUWkJNt,

4 PAMOYANAN 22.�Uj 2; 60i 25 SUKA I :AUIWLKNA

T-X.-d,T 2 D.k.ht.,i2W,0025U= KATON

4 A SDD-= --- Flix 3K� ... t7.889i 25TOM

3- -ruif.-p --2 �-- 7-qow - 4-0 UK LUN 9.425 2MEJASEM-IR,650

2 MulARMANWETAN 9-121 2 50=

L


PRUP 5" U-b 11' K-.At-, kML�H rmuri JUMLAHKtLURAHAN j F-ddkl Kel. 9V=n N 1". lItLU- N

MP-;

7. D 9'1)14� 1 25 41,652 4 1 '-'w420'� ULLNUONO

10,6111 �506. 'M.M.wi --- 24,3UI 21 00,000 S. J.. 5.331 I[

I VKUPUF, 7---Zsnw KtjttAN LOR 5,331 z.,uI MAKtiASAKI I I.J24I 250,000

I ! 30,3321 9 Z'2 ;9. B..y....ik i 67.7-5 �71 1.77 L,bskm 7,795 11 m I1, MltbKhy 12,196! 1 250.00DJ

I VTkm-ANSAlu- Y.6j I I I I KA j2: rtUALANUAN 7,7471

I - I It 3jSROND0LXnO1zlym -- 2. gangsfi 5WAM j4;SUMURBOTO

Eil %5ALffiAr6 ;NZ,, �wETAN j 12,950 I I BANOS RI 871 1 250 i5 I PADANG SARI- '321W haN

[11.5 K.b.p.t- B�b. 1 120,"4 121 3.000,0W - 1. '71 11 9 xi [MC lrjAy IYJU N U 8,41

AIR 250. 73,379! 61 21OW1000114.>97 2SEKUKQ I0'89qF---T-----2w0m

311AMOU 8,6291 1 250 IiP= - - -----I !11 ;LAMON(jAN bAJU 10,2.B 4. .h...-2LI� 41MUKTIHA IUDUL 23

21 KALIERANG I J KECAPI 1 250,uuKuhl Ulu � 2b�uluuu 2NCABlUr- l'bJ41 I I 61PEOURUNGAN 8,48z I zw'utm

j. W.."An 9,741 1 111.143�.k 9,632I KLAMPUK 25000 )NG LOR 250 lilltNU"AKI 9,6322 PtNAN I UNAN 11,133 I i

1 111.12 KA 39,729 31 1,000, 112.11 211�481 1, Z50,4. J.tib.,-g i 3 IU,578 1 3, 43.'Wu 10,D-7W -i T7:WFIBARANG KIDUL ANUCEN glq ! ZIPETUMPON 5"

I i II 1 JIbAMYANVA 7 723H.I.k..b. 64111 1 mlooo 2. w IIltIANJAKAIMA zw,wV , I-MM, Ij I G.Y.�.

19,1721 Z-- 04 11 iGAYA 15 7959,41D 250,000 5 0 250,000

2:KE-FANC,GUNGAN 9,762 250, pi TIM Kb.pt- Sm- i

aA47 I . 80561 1 It:I Kju I HAWE

PROPINSI, DTHTK--t-S--ATY-&-p&-W-0-RgAQ 11 71,216 2,000,M12, A�bmwa 20,3551 2 1 Fmd.dk KOI. I BantuaHI .Pekalongan B""'t 2V94 750,000 1 1 FANJANG zoul I � I

I MEL)UNU IJ,L-JU zw,wu 2 Ku 12,6011 zbul2�PODOSUGM &910 250,000 1 1 111.1 KaOupaten K-endeJBENDAN 9,274 zwuuu 4 -I'bUU,LULqJ. 1112

LOU, 111,3 KaDU D'fW'uuL4k.lo.g.

IPI MA Kabupaten lbl.ets1l 15 4,000'am6401 Kabupaten Bmbes r uuu.mmlv'�� m 1. AZ...Iy. Kotamadya Pekalongan 71,21C)i al 2'uu0'QVq

J KICA JUN LUK IL367 I!LtLXJ& 7,597 I zou. U KoMmadya Tegal 139'Zill 500.0mIf.a K.10upaten E31cra 40,5901 31 1,000,00q

7�9171 Tr---EWW 1 1 5UV 11I.-J Kabupatm Patt r Its.ml 2 wo.ULM�%T'Y-Mg % M 7,9171 E7711MILIOWINANUILIN ow. 111.10 Kabupaten Kudus r

111.111 - -- iQdw 1"419� Ii 111.14 M ,'.len 'I..l 1,000'm

W.U1541 4� 1.000,01Yjlll.14�tamadyaSa

111.7 Kt ... dy. Tn.1 j 139,217 10; 34M.000 4. Sid... a lu'lbu'u

1. Tnal Sdatan ^i7bi A; 75U,UUU I :I,uzl Z�U'uvu Z!) otal Q1,250,00(

57K.to.adya Sem.r-g 659,1091 57 16,750,2. M-Zd... 500,000 1. ut.. 7 2-100,0001 1 IV. DTND-GVXRAXTX-

zou'uw I. tSAN 18,7341 5w,0001 Iv.12NALIUANUSA 10.026! -- 2WRWVSAXJ Z." 1. Knfiba-ng

NUANreg.1 -r-, 40,931[ kYSARI

I MiN I A�QhN 16,314, - -sw(m JLQR2SLEROK Z.V,wu IDUKAN 7.9131 250.UUL§ L� K.kp ----------- 17xrl -I 7-79 Imj KkJAMIJUN RN"NI ----------- 5m 221 FHARGOM 250.000

I . 2 KAR(jU 10 127! 14Tn.1 B ... t 1 48,4561 49,4731 41 1,250,

IE(jALSARI 750.0W 250,I4.9j3I 250,000 2 gul;�ISIG-Aw 9,750[ 250, 3, Gi 16,2291 2i 30

3 PEKALIMAN i GINN4-MLAIIUAKU 2:JATTMULYU- 7.9J6

1.3 -. 5.1 I'W000L J.P.. J. �.a 4. �S-tol. ----------- = i I I 250,01)(

--- l -IEPON- 10.2481

L. C.P. 30-1A21 r---7SWW 3 (ARAN _I 1,606i 39,9941 4,IBALUN 12,0t5l ---- z5nw 4, KEM JAN'j ARU 18,8331 rzICEPU i 19,327' t 5� , 1 KAN(i AYU

6, KROBOICAN 143II 1.9 K.b.p.t.. P.ta 1- DRONO 16,764T-T�.tl�

I NIIJU�KIU 9,6401 V.2 K.b.p.t- R.m.17f=1. B..g..t.pa. �5w uuu

-gkil 10,047! -1 -J---H6,0-06 MAN ---------I IRANUKIL 2 EiA FU

bup.ten Kdus 1- )5ARI 11.441 K-H..LK.i-..g. 2 PU �VYMI(

7-5 3 NGAJAN

2. B---- GMDANQMANIS 250,0U0 47,4014 i 4 I I'z5u, 22-M441 2!

Z 18,9661 ll- SW606-T-uo - � zouLSARI 15,333

[tu 8,

K.d- 7. T-b.]

=�p

8,815JEIF--

IANG-

6I LO 13 i 250-'Myo

FFOlu- 9.043 - 25T.00D

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Pige 32

b-I U-U II, 11, mm mm, 3UMLAMN l,1MUdUk KELURAMA Ftnmwuxi Kel., f.W.UKAHAN FCWUCLuk i Kill.!

3. r.k..l ... n L4,1111 L[ zsa�OODJ1 5,5Z7 L u 14JII

2[WUIKbJU 21 -L w viu23.138 1 37,418 41 1100010001

3 9,435 11 250,00012 13AUSAbRAN L 9,4J3 ; 250,

I 5UMVZt-�IUNU Izz3J I I I2.CANUEN I u >. hfis 2

j 42A% jUUWUNtiAN J 2�-%JNUOSAJU 7,942 1 250,13,OD61 I zbu,uuu i DUAGUNG 10,042

iNza-p-la-k -,I -14,07rr--l I NUAMM-NN K.t..& Mojokerto 37,07,4 41 1,000.0001

i i2 NGTOFRAJAN "VI zou,IJ7rI�", a n 2B--uO1 2 750,000 f 1. 71TIRANWAN i lu.m

I FUNLUbAKI --- n,72 T Krawn 17,4791 2; 1 9,0292�TRIMUR11 16, TPhItFUN 1 7,9 11

2"KAD)FAILN i 9,5561 17,14111 IISALbNLibAlU 8,591 250,00C

I � WOKUKRUMO 3 NUUNU1 Z1]`"KJ:I I; �� GWARU ;Mo OEM IIi � 13 bw zw:uuta 1 V.3 mad Sumbaya 1,775,020 92�

ltismagi B:b IV J ;d0U,UM* 11. 7JAM 74,51 z*u,= i I III[ILIDAki ULFJN 9,347

9- Uondoku...S. 1 44,712 31

2I SRICADING 9,311 - IILONTAR L4,bbl I zwuuqIt"AN I 14, J I I I

11,641 1 250,0011 2 i KLNREK� � I 1-111. i bm! 39'm 3 1 1y"M LY 1 zw.uvA iiI i K.AKANu FMANG

TMJIMU 0 11,641 ZZ)u'uuu 3MMANUAN I -8,4951 i I I I�tKEBRAON 15,905 50B.00CR

13, Kmtk 250,0411) 10. Kotag 1 z5Jm 31 1J1KhL)UKU5 15,585V,uVO 250,00E) hPRENGGAN .um I 50010M

ly.3iKab.p tm Umu.g Kd.1 21PUIMAYAN ZWOOC 3. [Wiyng 750,OWI'M 250,0001

MA16 91 i 750, 11HAIMIAN 1 250,won.man 744 MOOD 1 2 1 virmI I KEF'kK 9,744 ZW,UW II.jM&utnjmm 37 750 3 J TSO�M J AIA�

I 1TRYOD1Nn9G1&Cr-- 250,OOCMANI KMrKUN I I,W I z uzw.uwl i 50

MINI& � �V 2 !UA 1" TMUCWM KALI KENDALI 1GUNLINUSARI 12,ulf

12, 153.! S..... z I U&utt KUMN(I 14.775,

im ;;KUSUMXN ------- 77" ; -2 9,555� 250,.2 KEPAFAKAN

10,662 1 25D,001) 52,3Wi 47--,�I 10.661 13.iW.,.b,.j- 1 28,788f 31 7so %97---,TrMWXEXqKk.KIU

I iWIROURAJAN 9,4321 i 21JEMUIRU'XUNUSAIU 10,9301 Ow,=Il37 T. S�lu -- TF ZnN 2 PATANUPULUrt" a..'a I RLJE) 9,1601 250.

I 4,96> 1 j,FAKUNLhN H.28L� 250,00C 1

& NZ..e. T"mb.Ih.,J. 33-397 4� -g 250.01501__I. rAMrUNII I�KA 12.135

2: lAkiUNAN O..Y.t7. Sipt.S.. 7,756 1 250,000 3 WAFUNGISOTO I 8,447[ V.Y."gan

1;KEPEK I 7,756 ZMuLlu 4�MUJA-MUJU lujuzl i "'Ayu,"'AN I �2-50I1Z: Kh I IN rVTG R!,

9JG g,.. Kingkasan: Ut YOGYAKAK IAT T75 I ung 38,735! 31 1.000,0001

M PiNSi, D.ti ii, Ka.at,,rl, NU-ILH - ----- LIRUNGKUr9. 1 F.I,Y.. 7,74% - I 250,000 KELURAHAN i P-ddk I Kel.. Ban NfiBARUr. 10,606 25u,q

E�I-NGDUWET 7,766 i 250,000 U I KIDUL

298.550 -- 321 7,5W,OOGllV.1 Kabupaten Kulon Pmgo 10t,3461 12� !9. n, R2,1.s mepy. Z3,9401 2 1 sm,00al1. W.P.39 47MZ 41 1,000,0001[V.2 Kabup-aTwn-ff8-nEFP- �,ujul Zfi -FM51 1 25(.OEM

lJt5Atx,,-AIUK 12,% --- 7w-o 1 85,4161 j i -11-TO37- - 20,22411 3 "allpal U U �.,5501 zz�

TRIHANWO 11.992 i 25 IV.* rOTZMaCYa TOgYaKafM 11 jql W,=I j ng Anyu 19,2911 210,471 .. , I -.-

i I Total --- T'107.95at ic4,, 30.250. 9.298 250,DDOI2. LM1.6 i ! I i

7,78(,T-- 50,5831 41 1,000,V. JAWA TIMUR 3,551.7641 242! 94,00DV.1 Kb.p.ten Sidosrjo 104XTF-10. L �M�-Mrm 5,54yi i zoul

3,KLAMPISNIjASEMT-S 1. StdorJO :�� , 250,40v.wu i 1: LhPAAH FU I KA /W. MLNUK rUMrUN I 14t IJJ

3 m 25u,wCY 2. K... 112. 36,6701 Y7--""m1 KRIAN zw, M ARSABIUMAN 14.610i J

4, Kaloon 24,11" 12 i 5MIUMANI 12,756i Ybu'uvu T. W.R.. 7,7041 IF

I:WUNUUULU 7,704 i . 250,13. Gubeng

3- -Sij.p. 16,71 4. Lid..gan 17,8771 I� 500, 1 PUCANG S 4.692� 250,00CA .. a[ Y.�31 2 AIRLANWA 29,1341 750,0001

1 MM --- T-mgEu-- 8,2291 A= 14.93512 AKIjUAFjUNG16-7071 500,Wq

6.. D".k 81,4 3. W- 60 1 �MLKJAJATA --- 27.087! 75(,WqI CONDONGCANUR 30,104t 1 11250'auu 12,975i 250

rtphLbulj KUKMbAKI 1 z-J39, zzu, IIWUNOKRL)MO 13.D461

7. G.d..ft 20,1Ut-f- WW 4 WADUNriSARI 9.113 i --- 2 2 SAWUNQUAL UI Si OLUHUR 9,35fr--r---25DGW I KUrL)L)U 15,3931 �LKWv2 Sf VAKUM 4; OA"lo zo 970i

V.2 K.b.pte. Mojokefto 7,7731 1 5iNGAGEL1. 5..k. 7,7731 V.

Ou'uu I hUL)ru 94,97419,293 500.DDE4

V.3 Kh.pat- Bjmgol. II I I- soow 1Z�WUNUKWV 25.6141 -. 15U.Dcul5mlogo .3 Kb?U I KAN 21.676 5w.uuq

_250-M -7-TIMOUNUUUM)2 LEDOX KULON 9. 166 i 2W.=

mal,HARIO VA Kb.patm Tb.. 24,213i -T- 7MM I

11,51 I 8.387[ 2WW

81161 1 250-,MJV.SW t.. d qt;

41I ALON-ALON C ONU 9.305i

7665 25(y. 2�BLIBUTAN 14.989,3 PA 7.54�1 750.

1. GUNDIH 26.639, 750,0001

Pagc 33 Indonesia: Urban Poverty PrqiectPAD

rtNbi. U.11 11, 3.rd&HKbLUKAtlAN KLLU.--11

JKP.i L tKii

MG-teng 14. Pumobuju SWIM 13. DompitI,&tIA1$ANV 1 9,507 zo.'� 1. � VtNAN zou'm I UAmrLi w 6 750ZIULNItINU 9,016 i Z;PUKWUHARJO ij1FhNLLhH 16,432 1 1 1 V.15 Kt...dy Watmg I' 539,63Z 36! 114.750,1311111"4 � EMBON KALLASIN 12,827 Z!)U,I)W 13 (ientmg 37,2731 21 1'064,m au'Y7

GENTENG WE7rAW- IIWLAI� Ju'Ku3 1.250,000119 Ta.bak Sad _2_M

173,242 YF--43WW Ir.NU&UWN 20.5501 *WIVLM 2 KEDUNUKANi 3.6931 250,00q751,Mi 1 1 j ISUMLAYU 7,607

I! rALAK &LLINU 27,177 1 ZW-i2 1 KANUY-Nh ------ T--TFM -i 500.000 M 1z1jz7i II Z5%QM 4iLEMNPURO 9,486 2-'Ai

1 3 IAMISAKbUU Z"Ij. RmVJAMpI Iz1jz71 zbu.wc 5WALWOPURO - ---- FrM33,24.1� I 6 SAWOJAJAR

7.3,3211 2 soomI'JAJAU 13,2&41 ZbU,UUL �Z� 5.k.n -3-Z5111-1111111111

201 Simi 10.0371 i Z*V'uuL I I bUPLUN Z3,112I KAPASAN 15,11/1 I ; : - 21JANDULAN 250,00q

21, 71 , 50U.000 V. Kb.p.t- B-do-B 26,511121 X fWWU J-&AXANUNtbUKI31SIDOVAL)i 17. 047 1 500,000 1. 9-do.0- 14�CIFTOMEJLYG 6,1654TSPRUGkWURG--� � � , � liKOTAKULON fib"UUANOI (,BID

I 1 2! DABASAH zou'ums O!MULY ti'my ZW.UUUI21 Keiam. 64,3621 DEAN 4!pzu I 4W.004 7!(jADA IO,)77

I!bIL)VLVruwr.1� 12Q� KALI MIL)INDING 7%3au Pat= Situbondo 106AW! 9 LQ= :J. lUojenIB"Uki 5WOUUI jI1IuuuLoALEM Y'008250 zz�I Ai i 2woutg

I Pth[SIR zbu'uuq ZIKASIN I 19,%Z bwlmqbemami 4 3,750,000 2 BESUKI =:;M'1F-= ZF)u'OOcj 3JKLOJi 250,0014

24,39U i 4;(jADINCKASRI "AYbUIJKLAN is M bw.uuul

13.017 2. iFans km 204901 21 �Wluuul 31VAXtNt, ill 5MIOU1439,578 I bUMMMKOLAK 1 9,

ULM .1 i 4JI Z501MRSWUM I,ztu.uuu 2 KILEN ARI FN A 12,98

I SIKAU 5 zw'OuqT-SRE.Vondo 27,7711 21 750,Mq

I KREMBANUAN "Aw'000 IFATOKAN 7 ;s:;gl i z 4. 1 tm�m 116-'m 7 1ouu,uuu L LtAWUkIAN DMIJUCI I [JVUIFAN 17, 37 5w.

�t]IINYAMPLUN(iAN 1 ju'311 i 250,000 I 2 t5UNUL.F.1-JU Z4,690 750,,CBONGKARAN 14,31U 2501OW i4i� 2SX1 1 2 t I� FULEMAN 17,160 -AM,

I FLAFUERU ZbuUULI ."Umwv 1 16,4Kt..b I BAAN AN *W1uLM ISLIMBINfj 12,607 1 xw.

947 Du'uuu 13,9UA � mb�u� �Z� I 13,111 MIT,= 5. -11-yptih ',"'I Li Awl--V I r"L�WANUI I lb,275 -,M,

7,Tni I 25010oq4 M;grmpm(. 5� Lo-k.mII MKAK BAKA I -p-B`&---pFiFOmiz-zO 25011)[11111 1 TANJUNUSbX".

31111311 IL- 250,MR TA-1-11MULYU 13,307ad. MtIbfOCtuAWU9G- -TF3 j�Mbi i lu'wli ! 9=I i UALUNIbAKI 4-bVMb%bKbAKI Ow,wI2iMANUKAN KI)i 1 79,0241 9i 2= �-LOW AKtJ 2�.065 I fbo'uut

;M.VUU 1. Lek.k "W[ ii -,--M 16,907 1 5woolIJAIIREJO 6-16j� zou I &LIAWAi i II'I 250

26 S.ko- .. &Z.J I 62,4031 zi 115001uuu 3 ILLXUMA.N 12,58250,0001

z.bjMVMuLYV 37 1,250, 9�903 259,99q V.16 Kot...dyi PF.5�1.ggo 61 1.I I1. M.Y-gm 65,60

ZJIA..,.WO 1 MOOD 3� Grui 7.5211 1 2 1 JATT 13,3901 zwlI'AbtMKVWU i 11,2261 - Asi - r sumBbRuFWASAKI zou'w 4 � IJIUNMAYLIV 11'1j�j W v.

I I 3-bu� u'w 11jig] I zwl2m sen-o 1 9,7.351 T-i---BTM 479ij-,- -- i 1 4, MAYANGAN 8,933.

9, fj�' 250,000 --- FrXNOMGNMRLANG 7.5521 ;iDu. KANIUARkN I 13,81ul rk.

V.9 Kab.i Bmy..-Ri 1 393,031 34; 9,750,000 Ge.pol 2esn I 2 7,678 1 129,8441113 7NFow I 11,6221 I

.4*U laI ZILNUV L tKUNAIN I 9,022 25T,= 2 GEMPOL S-9wI 250,

t 14,1141 250.Gm V.17 41,163 51 iasojmq3 LA i �.Nu 7,724[ zou'wu 6. F.Cm 7,7151 1 M, 16,1551 2 -Welue"

7.7151 ztul I Pi!;M SAIU 8,4371 'dW'uLM2- TgAldlim 7,7501 Tr---B'D-,W FUMMN I KI:

r 7,7501 Zbu,UM 17,6281 2 3m,

WS�Ul. �VALLM 250, 2. Gdi.gmj. 25,0081 31 7-"^M3. Clunng 1 32,675� 31 75O.We 2 FVIAK 11 91 250.uuq I LIAVINUKWU

-T-rANIFU- i 10,101 2 IKAJtN'j S'u,; 25i2 dLNUULUK ZbU,UUU V.14 Kbp.t- M.Iani 240,0681 2, ol 9. 167 T zwuui3 CLURINfj 9.320� zbu,uuu 1. Kepajm 12�"31 1 i

I KEPANJEN I 250,4S.nggo. K,ngkasan : PKUPINtit JAWA I IMUM

I SONLi(jUN 250.0 23.W5 1M m, LLiZV 250, NIL 11, K-..t-, ium5GI-.Oe 2 LkWANQ 12-7591 250 YtLUKAMAN Peaduduk! Kai. HanWwq

I SEPANJANci --- M937-1 25TOW -zou,uuu j5.w 34,472 � 3

I FASANWIFLARAN 9.6531 230 bupaten Sidoatfo iui Z.15C.F'-Zza,.. 12.1491 2t 2 NQAGLIK 10.99T 250 v.y. maoupajen mopKerm 1 1 zbuutjq

zou,miti 3 wbix 14.822 i 250 V.3 T paten SaMogwo P21KESI R 8,7131 250,000 v pate I uDan 24,2131 3 1 T*u'uLM

I 4 �,.gosmn 19 V.5 Kabupaten Lamongan r 34,042! 31 fw,ULR421 5w1w I k�ANUL� UUU 10.03� ztu, V.6 KatTupaten (iresLk 37,4131 4 1 I.QW.OUUj

IJ'134! ZSU= 2 BANJARARUM 9. 14J: ZMJ, V. 1 KOtamadya 19= 37,0241 4 1.UOU.UUUj2 -KESONVALEM 2WIODD VTKO-taffia-Wa-S 1,775,0 UZ 4(.---UO.UUUI

5 Pkjsji 36.062, 2 I V 9 Kabupaten uwepAvam 3K.Iib.- ILIOI I Z MOW I L.947 � z5a, v. I u Kaoupaten aonaamso 26-.MzI1 KALIBARU MANIS 8.9771 - 25noo EBONAGLTNG 24-2151 -- V. II Kabupaten 5,tubondo 106,55319 2,750,

ZOVIULM Probongg 8,059,926 i I i 19

6NW, iSurUan 1 49smpu W.4-W- 3 1,06nm Oten mawq r7Wr- ,I LIENDuti V.15KOtamadyaMaIa r 539 6821

947! _z5T= 7. S..b., F.w. TT Kotamadya Pm;Wn-gi 73:255, 1. t5o,3 I1,fMUUUKUH is':144i MG FbUMLILK PUCUNCi 10.996, 4 v. I I Koiamaoya �asuruw 41.1631 5: 1.Z

2 K-AFLANCjKATES K,9tg ;ebu.10 -p-j. M 147-2- -560-100 I otat -Yb5T,154124

F-AEA 6LUH ------ FOrUF- -25CFOM . imbuit 9.724, 1 2OKFJO 9,236i i Ki 9.724: 2

ITT- lip-0 23,401 2 750.W 9tio.dangleg. 17.213; 2 -- 306

I KALIPURO 16.7971 '000 -- F-GDNU-I,LM KULON U77: zw.2 rf-giLl -250'ma W t IAN S.Vjb:

32,108' 1 11.170i I-- FKEDLTNG '6911 1 TUREN 11.1for

Z 1"WuNuKhju L2,4171 buuluuuI IL, D. 9.414 i 250-00%

Z5;y�- 75W'Ow -- F-mIJLYO AGUNG 9-4W 2

----------------- L-



ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS

Project Component Local | Foreign Total-----------------------US $ million-----------------

1. Grants for subprojects 86.0 23.4 109.4

2. TA and Services for Management/Implementation 13.5 2.0 15.52.1 TA for PMU 0.5 0.5 1.02.2 TA for oversight consultants 4.0 0.5 4.52.3 Service contracts (kelurahan facilitators; trainers) 9.0 1.0 10.0

3. TA for Monitoring and Evaluation 1.1 0.4 1.5

4. Increased Government Administration 3.3 0 3.3

Price and Physical Contingencies 1/ 0 0 0

Total Project Cost 103.9 25.8 129.71/ No contingencies included as the project is prograumatic. The major uncertainty is the exchange rate that will

prevail during implementation; if the rupiah rate improves, the credit fnances less.

Note: The standard ANNEX 4 does not apply

ANNEX 5FINANCIAL SUMMARY

Years Ending March 31(US$ million, current prices)Implementation Period

2000 2001 2002 2003 Total %Project Costs1. Grants for subprojects 40.0 40.0 23.4 6.0 109.4 842. TA for Implementation 5.0 6.0 3.0 1.5 15.5 123. TA for Monitoring 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.1 1.5 14.Increased Gov't Admin. 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.3 3.3 3Total 46.6 47.6 27.6 7.9 129.7 100

Financing Sources %IDAI/ 36.5 36.5 21.5 5.5 100.0 77IBRD 5.0 6.0 3.0 1.5 15.5 12GOI 5.1 5.1 3.1 0.9 14.2 11Total 46.6 47.6 27.6 7.9 129.7 100

Main assumptions: 1/ Initial disbursement from the Loan to the Special Account to take place upon loan effectiveness; theSA and the different fiscal year ending account for differences with yearly loan disbursements on page 1.



PROCUREMENT, DISBURSEMENT AND AUDnITNG ARRANGEMENTS

Procurement

Procurement methods (Table A)

Procurement of works and goods will follow the "Guidelines for Procurement under IBRID Loans and IDACredits" dated January 1995, and revised in January and August 1996 and September 1997. Employment ofconsultants and the format for consultant contracts will be based on the "Guidelines for Selection and Employmentof Consultants by World Bank Borrowers" of January 1997, as revised in September 1997.

Procurement under Grants (subgrants or loans) for subprojects (Table 6A)

There is a ceiling of Rp50 million for a fund to provide small revolving credits to individuals/groups and ofRp3O million for any proposal by a group. The funds are to cover consultants, services, goods and works, asneeded for preparing and implementing subprojects. The proposal for each subproject approved will be signed bythe Oversight Consultant, the Kelurahan Forum leader and the lurah. It will be attached to an ImplementationAgreement) signed by the members of the subproject group and the PjOK (Project Manager). Individualprocurements will be small and widely dispersed. Procurement procedures thus include national shopping,procurement of small works, and community participation following best commercial practices. Standard formatsare in Annex 12.

Facilitators. Facilitators or advisors can be hired by the groups that propose or implement subprojects.The selection can use appointment procedures for individuals or service contracts based on 3 offers. The feeswould be paid from the subproject funding when the proposal or claims are approved.

Goods. Goods shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of national shopping procedures.Quotations must be obtained from at least 3 reputable suppliers on the basis of a detailed description and quantityof goods, as well as the desired delivery time and place.

Works. Works that can be implemented efficiently with labor intensive methods can be undertaken bycommunity participation. Other works will be procured under the Bank procurement category of small works(given the ceiling of the grant); they can be contracted under lump-sum, fixed price contracts awarded on the basisof quotations obtained from 3 reputable domestic contractors in response to a written invitation. The invitation shallinclude a detailed description of the works, including basic specifications, the required completion date, a basicform of agreement acceptable to the Bank, and relevant drawings, where applicable. The award shall be made tothe contractor who offers the lowest price quotations for the required work, and who has the experience andresources to complete the contract successfully.

Procurement by the PMU (Table 6.AI)

Consultants. There will be national management consultants for the PMU and oversight consultants foreach province to establish teams at the kabupaten level. Facilitators will also be selected and hired by the oversightconsultants. The PMU in Jakarta will select and hire oversight consultants for 2 years (9 contracts for Phase 1,larger kelurahans in Northem Java) and technical assistance for monitoring and evaluation. Later, oversightconsultants may be selected and hired by each local govenmment as may be appropriate.


Prior review thresholds (Table B)

Considering the small amount involved in any one expenditure under grants, and the delays that the priorreview could entail by forwarding to the Bank, the OC will do the prior review, before countersigning. The Bankwill conduct field visits during the project start-up period and carry out prior reviews for contracts that may beready, expected to be a small sample of goods valued above $2,000 and works valued above $3,000 equivalent. Atleast 3% of the subproject implementation agreements will have contracts reviewed ex-post the first 6 months;thereafter this percentage will be adjusted based on the Bank's assessment of the effectiveness of the OCs.

Consultant contracts processed by PMU, for national management support, oversight consultants includingfacilitators, and monitoring and evaluation, will be reviewed by the Bank prior to approval. The total contractvalue, including service contracts, subject to prior review will be $7 million.

Procurement plans

Each proposal/Implementation Agreement includes a section on procurement. This will be reviewed in theverification of proposals and discussed and agreed prior to the signing. The Bank may participate in some of thediscussions. The process to mobilize oversight consultants and trainers is advanced, to enable their training prior toloan effectiveness. An advertisement for national management support has been placed in 2 Indonesiannewspapers.

Disbursements

A4llocations of loan proceeds (Table C)

Grants for subprojects: An arrangement will be made by MOF to channel funds through its regionalKPKNs to the preselected BRI outlets. Selection of BRI outlets will be based on their proximity to thekelurahanand their liquidity. They will be provided with the amount of the grant allocation for eachkelurahan and therelevant signature specimens to withdraw funds. KF will open a KF Account in the BRI office which will befunded when at least 5 subproject implementation agreements are approved. The PjOK shall endorse thedocumentation from the groups and forward it to the KPKN, that in turn instruct BI to transfer the required amountto the BRI office Kelurahan Forum account. The initial transfer is 40% of the kelurahan grant; a second transfer of40% would follow when the account balance is 10%, the OC, KF and PjOK are satisfied with the use of earlierfunds and with the justification of further funding. The final 20% will follow in the same way.

When the subproject implementation agreement is signed, the group may claim payments in accordancewith the terms of the agreement, from the local designated BRI outlet. Payments to the groups may be in cash ordeposited to the group's account. Subsequent claims for payment will be based on progress reports certified by theconsultant, the lurah, the KF, and the PjOK. Upon presentation of the completion report, the final balance isdisbursed to the group.

The BRI office can disburse to the group against approved subproject documentation (agreement or claimamounts) after verification of signatures. It will have a record of credits and debits byKelurahan, and verify thatthe latter do not exceed the former; it will also verify that it does not disburse more than was approved for eachsubproject (debits should be identified by date and withdrawer). Records shall be made available tomonitorers andauditors upon request. BRI may invest partially any balance and keep accrued interest to compensate its operatingcosts incurred, but at any time shall have sufficient liquidity to pay claims within the balance amount. PeriodicallyBRI would provide disbursement statements by kelurahan, kecamatan and kabupaten (may be province) and send astatement to the Project Secretariat and DG Budget, Ministry of Finance.

Expenses by the PMU: Requests for payment approved by the PMU on contracts entered into by itself orthe levels II on its behalf for the project, would be paid by the SA directly to the consultant or the service provider,


to their designated bank accounts.

Use of statements of expenses (SOEs): Disbursements will be made against Statements of Expenditure(SOEs) for subproject grants, services, individual consultant contracts of less than $50,000 equivalent andconsulting firm contracts of less than $100,000 equivalent. Documentation for subproject expenditures will beretained by the community groups at kelurahan level; as appropriate, by the PjOK at district level and by thecommercial bank. Documentation for other expenditures procured by the PMU (i.e., services, individual consultantcontracts less than US$50,000 equivalent and consulting firm contracts less than US$100,000 equivalent) will beretained by the PMU. All other disbursements from the loan will require full documentation and they will beretained by the PMU. All documentation will be made available to the Bank and auditors upon request.

Special Account: GOI will establish a Special Account at Bank Indonesia denominated in US dollars, withan authorized ceiling of $10,000,000. The Account will be managed by the Directorate General of Budget (DGB),Ministry of Finance. The initial advance will be $5,000,000 upon credit effectiveness and until withdrawals reach$20,000,000; the account will be replenished on a monthly basis, or when 20% of the authorized ceiling has beendisbursed, whichever occurs first.

Flow of Funds. The PMU's Pimpro (for PMU expenses) and the PjOKs (for subprojects) will beresponsible for authorizing expenditures in accordance with the agreed budgets under existing governmentprocedures. They will submit their payment requests to the DG Budget or their respectiveMoF Treasurer (KPKN)who will issue payment remittance orders (SPM) to Bank Indonesia to credit the payee's accounts at the latter'srespective banks and to debit the project Special Account. The DG Budget will provide KPKN with guidelines andcriteria for eligible project expenditures, in accordance with the Credit Agreement. All the required formsnecessary to submit payment requests and the relevant documentation are standard and are currently applicable toall foreign-funded projects. KPKN will provide copies of the payment remittance orders (SPM) and othersupporting documents to the DG Budget regularly. Based on these documents and the Bank Indonesia statement ofthe SA, DG Budget shall prepare applications for replenishment of the SA.

Disbursements for subprojects will be channeled through the regional KPKNs (both Bank and GOI funds) tothe preselected BRI outlets. The authorized group, presents documentation signed by the OC,PjOK, KF leader andlurah at the preselected BRI outlet for payments. The initial transfer of 40% of kelurahan grant, when the first 5agreements approved, will be funded 10% from GOI funds and 30% from the Special Account in Bank Indonesia,from the World Bank credit. Subsequent transfers, the second 40% and final 20%, will be fully funded from theSpecial Account. Funds flow diagram for subproject disbursements is attached.

Payments to the oversight consultants and the national management consultant will be by Jakarta's BI/KPKN,upon authorization of the Project Secretariat.

Financial Management System

Internal Control System. The project will follow the standard government's financial mechanism whichincludes an internal control system--consisting of an institutional framework (project organization), accountingsystem, and control procedures. The adequacy of staff to carry out the project and adoption of internal controls bythe agency involved under the project, will be reviewed during project start up.

The PMU will have a Project Manager (Pimpro) and Treasurer from Bappenas, and a small team of consultanttechnical staff to carry out procurement and financial related administration. The qualification requirements forPimpro and Treasurer are as follows:Pimpro Treasurer* Competent staff of the agency * Competent staff of the agency* University degree (S1) * Diploma (D2 or D3)* Minimum staff level III/c * Minimum staff level II/c* Attainment of project management course * Attainment of treasury course certificate or


certificate or equivalent equivalent* Two years working experience in a * One year working experience in

government project government project

Financial Statements. The project financial statements showing the financial position of the project during thefiscal year ended on March 31 will comprise of the following:

(a) Financial Statement of Project Accounts: The PMU will maintain separate accounting records, on cashbasis, for each source of funds, i.e. Annual and Cumulative Project Expenditures and Financing (APEF andCPEF). The APEF and CPEF will cover the subproject expenditures by district, kecamatan and kelurahan,as consolidated by the PMU from reports by the BRI, DG Budget, KPKNs, as well as expenses made bythe PMU for consultant services. The community groups shall retain the relevant supporting documents forsubproject expenditures, PjOK and BRI offices shall keep the groups' receipt of funds, and PMU will keepthe documents related to consultants' service expenses. All the documentation shall be made available forannual audit and random inspection by the Bank.

(b) Financial Statement of Special Account and SOE: The DG Budget, as custodian of the project SpecialAccount and responsible for disbursing funds from the Bank, will prepare the financial statements of theSpecial Account and the SOE (Statements of Expenditures). The financial statements in standard formats(June 1992) will include the following:

* Deposits and replenishments to the Special Account received from the Bank* Withdrawals from the Special Account, including all SOEs (both from SA and other accounts) used as

the basis for submission of withdrawal applications* Remaining balance at the fiscal year end* Reconciliation between amount received by SA and amount disbursed by the Bank

Project Financial Management Reporting Requirements. As part of the monitoring system, the PMU willreport to the Bank, progress of financial status on a quarterly basis, no later than one month after the end of quarter.

All financial reports, generated from reports by KPKN and DG Budget will follow the agreed formats(provided in the PIP), which include the following:

* Annual and Cumulative Project Expenditures and Financing (APEF and CPEF)* Progress Report of Project Expenditures and Financing (PRPEF)* Summary of Sources and Uses of Funds (SSUF)* Contract Expenditures Report (CONREP)* Project Expenditures and Financing by District (LOCPEF)* Status of Loan Disbursements (STATLN)

Auditing Requirements

The quarterly progress reports would be used as the basis of preparing the financial statement of projectaccount (namely APEF and CPEF) to be submitted to the BPKP for annual audits. The annual audit reports shallbe fumished to the Bank no later than 9 months after the end of the government fiscal year, i.e., not later thanDecember 30 each year.

The PMU will prepare the project accounts for audit by BPKP head office that will provide the auditopinion. Likewise, the BPKP head office will also audit the financial statement of Special Account and Statementof Expenditure (SOE) prepared by DG Budget. The audits by BPKP auditors would be in accordance with terms ofreference for the audit of project performance, project accounts, Special Account. BPKP will also audit dueprocess and due diligence by community groups on a sample basis, and the attainment of objectives according toperformance indicators. BPKP will coordinate its sampling with that of audit agencies at levels I and II to avoidone kelurahan being audited more than once in any year.


URBAN POVERTY PROJECTReports and Funds Flow Diagram

.. krBnkBa

Task Manager / LOAAS

BAPPENAS . MinistryvofFinance |.... Snkndnesn1 Center.......... DGB . SA GOI

UPP SecretariatNational Consultant 90% ' 10%

; | ~~~~~~~~~~~KPKN ...........SPM Province

SPP

| Oversight | . KabupatenConsultant

[Witato~jj '.-.. Kelurahan Forums* I \s L = = = ' -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~........

,, | \ i PjOK i L; > ~~~~~Kecamatan

| F ac ilitators petrahan Fooumsn Ar nr

t[Community |Technical |_ ~ ru

- Assistantstanc

nuppifersetc

....................... ...Authorization of disbursement for the kelurahan===> Approval prior to PjOK forwarding

-.......... -- - Informationfteports flow from kelurahan progress (Implementation Agreement or claims)-- > Assistance

O' Fund flow


Annex 6, Table Al: Project Costs by Procurement Arrangements(in US$ million equivalent)

Expenditure Category Procurement Method Total Cost(including

contingencies)ICB NCB Other N.B.F

1. Grants for subprojects 109.4 (98.5) 1/ 109.4 (98.5)

2. GOI Administration 3.3 3.3

Total n.a. n.a. 109.4 (98.5) 3.3 109.4 (98.5)

Note: N.B.F. = Government coverage of its administration expendituresOther: 1/ procurement by cormnunity members under subproject agreements; these agreements also cover

the hiring of individuals under service contracts to implement the subprojects .( ) Figures in parenthesis are the amounts to be financed by the IDA credit.

Annex 6, Table A2: Consultant Selection Arrangements(in US$ million equivalent)

Selection Method Total CostConsultant Services (including

Expenditure Category contingencies)QCBS QBS SFB LCS CQ Other N.B.F.

A. TA for Implementation 5.5 (5.5) 5.5 (5.5)(PMU, OCs) l/

B. TA for Monitoring and 1.5 (1.5) 1.5 (1.5)Evaluation

C. Service contracts 1! 10 (10) 10 (10)

Total 7.0 (7.0) 10 (10) 17.0 (17.0)

Note: QCBS = Quality- and Cost-Based SelectionQBS = Quality-based SelectionSFB = Selection under a Fixed BudgetLCS = Least-Cost SelectionCQ =Selection Based on Consultants' QualificationsOther = Selection of individual consultants (per Section V of Consultants Guidelines), Conmnercial Practices, etc.These facilitators are hired by the PMU/OCs for the start up, prior to individuals hired by comnmunities (Table 6A)N.B.F. = Not Bank-financed( ) =Figures in parenthesis are the amounts to be financed by the IDA credit.

/ To be financed by SUDP Ln. 3726-IND.


Annex 6, Table B: Thresholds for Procurement Methods and Prior Review

Expenditure Contract Value Procurement Contracts Subject toCategory (Threshold) Method Prior Review / Estimated

Total Value Subject toPrior Review

US$ thousand US$ million

1. Grants for subprojects 3 Small works/ community n.a.National shopping/comm.

2. TA for 100 QCBS, Other Bappenas $5mimplementation andmonitoring

3. Service contracts 50 Time based $2m

Total value of contracts subject to prior review: n.a.

Annex 6, Table C: Allocation of Credit Proceeds

Expenditure Category Amount in FinancingUS$ million Percentage

1. Grants for Subprojects 98.5 902. TA and Services for Implementation 1.5 100

Total 100



PROJECT PROCESSING BUDGET AND SCHEDULE

A. Project Budget (US$) Planned Actual to 4/15/99(At final PCD stage)

Preparation, EASUR $200,000 $130,000PHRD grant TF25119 $750,000 $200,000

B. Project Schedule Planned Actual(At initial PCD stage) (to 4/15/99)

Time taken from initial PCD to appraisal -- 6 monthsFirst Bank mission (identification) - 12/01/1997Appraisal start 09/01/1998 09/28/1998Negotiations (loan) 09/10/1998 10/22/1998Supplementary negotations (for credit) - 04/09/1999Planned Date of Effectiveness 10/30/1998 07/08/1999

Prepared by: World Bank/Bappenas/consultants

Preparation assistance:

Messrs. Pungky Sumadi, Andrew McLemon, Darrundono, Erwin Fahmi, Guritno Soerijodibroto,Heru Nurasa, Hudi Sartono, Imam Krismanto, Oloan Simatupang, Sutan Jamaluddin and YandoZakaria and Mss. Rachmina Nurlily and Wiwiek Sudjono.

Bank staff who worked on the project included:

Name SpecialtyFrida Johansen Economics/Procurement/ManagementYogana Prasta Disbursements

Karin Nordlander Legal CounselBridie Champion DisbursementsThomas Walton Environment


ANNEX 8URBAN POVERTY PRJECT

DOCUMENTS IN THE PROJECT FILE

A. Project Implementation Plan

B. Bank Staff Assessments

Urban agriculture reviews, July 1998Preparation for West Java Environmental project, ongoingKIP reviewsRapid assessments, August 1998

C. Other

VIP and KDP documentsData on povertyPCD, PIDDecision meeting minutes

PHRD grant agreementContracts with project preparation teamDocumentation for hiring oversight consultants

(ads, list of respondents, long list, shortlists, terms of reference, LoI, evaluationcriteria, draft contract)

Terms of reference for trainersVarious cost estimate tablesDraft and final Project ManualDraft material for training of facilitatorsRegulation formalizing the SecretariatOther documents in IndonesianNegotiated Loan Agreement/Credit Agreement and minutes

0.L

ANNEX 9Status of Bank Group Operations in Indonesia

Operations PortfolioDifference Between '

expected 0Original Amount io US$ Millions and actual

Fiscal disbursements a/>Project ID Year Borrower Purpose

IBRD IDA Cancellations Undisbursed Orig Frm Rev'd

Number of Closed Projects: 216 >

Active Pro1ectsID-PE-36049 1999 GOI EARLY CHILD DEVELOPM 21.50 0.00 0.00 20.40 -1.10 0.00ID-PE-3967 1999 GOI FIFTH HEALTH PROJECT 44.70 0.00 0.00 43.66 .30 0.00ID-PE-40196 1999 GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA SUMATRA BASIC EDUCA. 54.50 20,10 0.00 74.60 0.00 0.00ID-PE-41095 1999 GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA SULAWESI BASIC EDUC. 47.90 15.90 00OO 63.80 0.00 0.00ID-PE-56074 1999 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA MUNICIPAL INNOVATION 5.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00ID-PE-63732 1999 CORPORATE RESTRUCTRG 31.50 0.00 0.00 31.50 0.00 0.00ID-PE-36048 1998 GOI CORAL REEF MGM REHAB 6.90 0.00 0.00 6.40 .30 .10ID-PE-36956 1998 GOI SAFE MOTHERHOOD 42.50 0.00 6.00 34.56 6.55 -.11ID-PE-37095 1998 GOI MALUKU REG. DEV 16.30 0.00 0.00 15.65 .65 0.00ID-PE-39644 1998 GOI W.JAVA BASIC EDUC. 103.50 0.00 0.00 100.50 -1.50 0.00ID-PE-3993 1998 GOI N.SUMATRA REG. ROADS 234.00 0.00 50.00 184.00 6.00 2.50ID-PE-40061 1998 GOI BENGKULU REG DEV 20.50 0.00 0.00 19.90 1.60 0.00ID-PE-45337 1998 GOI KECAMATAN DEV FUND 225.00 0,00 0.00 212.13 -.37 0.00ID-PE-48715 1998 IIDP 34.50 0.00 8.50 24.64 7.66 8.89ID-PE-55755 1998 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA BANKING REFORM ASST. 20.00 0.00 0.00 13.73 13.73 0.00ID-PE-35544 1997 GOI SOLAR HOME SYSTEMS 20.00 0.00 2.50 17.50 5.50 0.00ID-PE-36047 1997 GOI BALI URBAN INFRAST. 110.00 0.00 15.00 89.52 2.82 0.00ID-PE-36053 1997 GOI SULAWESI UDP II 155.00 0.00 42.05 94.44 66.80 6.45ID-PE-3987 1997 C.INDONESIA SEC.EDU. 104.00 0.00 0.00 96.50 28.79 0.00ID-PE-40195 1997 GOI QUAL OF UNDERGRAD ED 71.20 0.00 9.89 53.86 6.05 0.00ID-PE-4026 1997 GOI/PERUMKA RLWY EFFICIENCY 105.00 0.00 0.00 103.60 32.10 0.00ID-PE-40521 1997 GOI VILLAGE INFRA II 140.10 0.00 0.00 74.23 47.89 13.17ID-PE-41894 1997 GOI SUMATRA SEC EDUC 98.00 0.00 0.00 83.29 7.28 0.00ID-PE-42540 1997 IODINE DEF. CONTROL 2a.50 0.00 2.50 23.19 3.19 0.00ID-PE-49051 1997 BEPEKA AUDIT MODER P 16.40 0.00 .90 13.05 2.79 0.00ID-PE-37097 1996 GOI E.JAVA SEC.EDUC. 99.00 0.00 0.00 80.23 10.23 0.00ID-PE-39312 1996 GOI SECOND E. JAVA UDP 142.70 0.00 25.70 94.65 107.65 0.00ID-PE-39643 1996 GOI STD/AIDS 24.80 0.00 19.80 1.69 20.10 0.00ID-PE-3978 1996 GOI IND'L TECHNOLOGY DEV 47.00 0.00 6.00 24.13 22.57 6.58ID-PE-4003 1996 GOI SECONDARY SCHOOL TEA 60.40 0.00 30.00 19.22 31.23 0.00ID-PE-4004 1996 GOI HIGHER EDUC SUP.(III 65.00 0.00 6.85 33.93 -1.98 0.00ID-PE-4008 1996 GOI NUSA TENGGARA DEV. 27.00 0.00 4.90 14.18 3.69 -2.15ID-PE-4011 1996 GOI SULAWESI AGRI AREA 26.80 0.00 3.70 15.61 1.25 -I.75ID-PE-4014 1996 GOI KERINCI SEBLAT ICDP 19.10 0.00 0.00 17.44 6.22 0.00ID-PE-4016 1996 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA STRATEGIC URB. RDS 1 86.90 0.00 10.00 63.98 35.58 0.00ID-PE-4021 1996 GOI POW. TRANS & DIST II 373.00 0.00 80.00 180.43 207.42 -12.60ID-PE-41896 1996 GOI HR CAPACITY BUILDING 20.00 0.00 3.60 14.83 10.94 0.00ID-PE-3951 1995 GOI KALIMANTAN UDP 136.00 0.00 0.00 59.22 52.72 0.00ID-PE-3965 1995 GOI HEALTH IV:IMPR HEALT 88.00 0.00 20.00 49.08 27.58 5.07ID-PE-3968 1995 BOOK & READING DEV 132.50 0.00 31.50 76,04 29.79 -6.04ID-PE-3972 1995 GOI AG. RESEARCH II 63.00 0.00 14.10 36.46 34.06 -.78ID-PE-39754 1995 TA FOR INFRA. II 28.00 0.00 0.00 23.01 20.22 3.56ID-PE-3984 1995 GOI LAND ADMINISTRATION 80.00 0.00 16.50 28.12 26.92 0.00ID-PE-3988 1995 GOI PHRD II 69.00 0.00 0.00 28.41 10.39 0.00ID-PE-4001 1995 GOI TELECOM SECTOR MODER 325.00 0.00 50.00 188.66 143.66 0.00ID-PE-4019 1995 GOI ACCOUNTANCY DEV II 25.00 0.00 3.30 10.17 12.25 0.00ID-PE-3890 1994 GOI SEMARANG-SURAKARTA U 174.00 0.00 18.67 66.66 63.07 18.45

Difference Betweenexpected

original Amount in US$ Millions and actualFiscal disbursements a/

Project ID Year Borrower PurposeIBRD IDA Cancellations Undisbursed Orig Frm Rev'd

ID-PE-3910 1994 GOT SUMATERA f KALIMAN P 260,50 0.00 20.00 165.52 156.02 12.23ID-PE-3937 1994 GOI INTEGRATED SWAMPS 65.00 0.00 0.00 29.20 18.07 0.00ID-PE-3945 1994 GOI HIGHWAY SECTOR II 350.00 0.00 40.00 124.19 150.18 -185.83ID-PE-3954 1994 GOI JAVA IRR IMP & W R M 165.70 0.00 22.00 67.81 58.48 0.00ID-PE-3985 1994 GOI WTRSHED CONSERVATION 56.50 0.00 0.00 41.76 27.80 0.00ID-PE-3998 1994 GOI SURABAYA URBAN 175.00 0.00 30.00 68.96 81.03 17.21ID-PE-4010 1994 GOI DAM SAFETY 55.00 0.00 8.00 23.99 23.94 0.00ID-PE-4017 1994 GOI UNIV.RESEARCH FOR GR 58.90 0.00 11.23 18.11 20.46 0.00ID-PE-4020 1994 GOI KABUPATEN ROADS V 101.50 0.00 0.00 14.80 13.78 0.00ID-PE-3914 1993 GOI THIRD COMM HEALTH & 93.50 0.00 16.00 6.54 17.02 0.00ID-PE-3990 1993 GOI WTR & SANI FOR LOW I 80.00 0.00 11.00 26.17 37.19 0.00ID-PE-3999 1993 GOI GROUNDWATER DEVT. 54.00 0.00 24.94 1.86 19.60 1.80ID-PE-4006 1993 GOI E.INDONESIA KABUPATE 155.00 0.00 0.00 15.16 15.13 0.00ID-PE-4007 1993 GOI POWER (CIRATA II) 104.00 0.00 26.00 16.04 41.08 -4.28ID-PE-4009 1993 GOI INTEGRATED PEST MGMT 32.00 0.00 5.50 4.00 9.49 .59ID-PE-3860 1992 GOI TREECROPS SMALLHOLDE 87.60 0.00 9.30 11.59 20.11 0.00ID-PE-3916 1992 SURALAYA THERMAL POW 423.60 0.00 132.20 23.61 150.70 7.98ID-PE-3969 1992 GOI PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACH 36.60 0.00 3.20 2.75 5.95 0.00ID-PE-3997 1992 GOI TELECOM IV 375.00 0.00 50.08 47.02 97.09 7.01ID-PE-3977 1991 GOI THIRD JABOTABEK URB 61.00 0.00 6.24 5.45 11.70 1.31

Total 6,659.10 36.00 897.65 3,340.33 2,087.41 -100.64

Active Projects Closed Projects TotalTotal Disbursed (IBRD and IDA): 2,457.15 17,834.21 20,291.36

of which has been repaid: 49.18 8,422.38 8,471.56Total now held by IBRD and IDA: 5,748.23 9,545.62 15,293.85Amount sold : 0.00 88.08 88.08

Of which repaid : 0.00 88.08 88.08Total Undisbursed : 3,340.33 133.82 3,474.15

a. Intended disbursements to date minus actual disbursements to date as projected at appraisal.

Note:Disbursement data is updated at the end of the first week of the month and is currently as of 31-Mar-99.

0.3

Pa

a

n

>0


ANNEX 10

Indonesia at a glanceEast Lower-

POVERTY and SOCIAL Asia & middle-Indonesia Pacifc income D@wIoprnnt dlbmond

1997Populaton, mid-year (millions) 200.1 1.753 2.285 Uife expectancyGNP per capita (Atlas method, USS) 1,110 970 1,230GNP (Atlas method. US$ brions) 222.1 1,707 2818.

Average annual growth, 190147

Population (%) ..- 1.3 1.2Labor fore(%) I2Z5 1.4 13: GNplP Grass

per primaryMostrecentestimate (Iatmtyeuravailab,1 t 4rl7- - capita enrolment

Poverty (SS of populatton bwnatlofnapovwertyne 1 -:IUrban population (%6;of totalpWdalnk: 37" 32 42Life expectancy atbirf, (years) s 85 89 89Infant mortality (per 1000lbiithsJtjN 47 38 38:Child malnutrition (% oftdrWrunder5) 40: 16 .Acess to safe waterAccess to safe water(%; ofp ipopaffw, 82 84 84Illiteracy(56 ofpopuatWonaget5+) 1B 17 19Gross prinmay enrollment (%o so ptd n - 114 115 111

Male 1.117 118 1:118': -Lower e_ om egupFemale - 12 18 13; __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _

KEY ECONOMIC RATIOS and LONG-TERM TRENDS:- -

i 4 C t : ;:1976 19680:- 1996 1997M:: .Economic rateos

GOP (US$ bitlions) 393a -79.9 227.4 214.8Gross domestic investmentJGOP 24.1: 2 i 30.8 2o 32.1Exports of goodsand&seOvicGOP- 24.5 -20.2 25.8 28.1 TradeGrss domestic savingstGOP- 27.1 28.3 30.2 30.9Gross nationalsavingpsGOP .. .. 25.5

Current account balance/GOP - - .: -3*5 -12 Domestic nesmtInterest payments/GOP: 12 3.0 2 1 Invest2ent Total debtlGOP 3854B 53.7 58.7 4a SavingsTotal debt servicelexports .. .. 35.5Presertvalue of debt/GDP ,, ,. 550Present value of debtlexports .. .- 208.8

Indebtedness197848: 1987U.7 1996 1997 199I 42

(average annual growth)GOP 8.7 7.8 8.r 4.8 .. 1ndonesa i

GNP per capita 4.1 8.1 5.8 3.5 .. -Lowern4nhomegzpExports of goods and serices -1.7 871 8.3 8.3 .

STRUCTURE of the ECONOMY1976 1988 1996 1997 Growth rates of output and investment 1%)

(% of GDP) -1Aguncultdre 29.7 24.3 16.5 16.1Industry 34.1 33.8 43.2 43.9

Manufacturing 10.4 16.8 25.5 25.6 sServices 38.3 41.9 40.3 40.1

Private consumption 63.5 6Z8 6Z3 6Z2 92 O3 94 Gs 9s 97

General govemment consumption 9.4 - 11.1 7.6 6.9Imports of goods and services 21.5 20.5 28.4 29.2

19786S 1987-97 1996 1997 Growth rates of expoata and impartst (%(average annua/ gmowth)Agrculture 4.1 3.2 3.2 0.6 2TIndustry 8.5 10.0 10.5 5.6 20

Manufactunng 14.5 11.0 11.7 6.2 isServices 8.7 7.9 7.2 5.3 /

Private consumption 10.0 7.9 7.4 7.5 sGeneral govemment consumption 9.2 3.9 3.8 0.1 oGrossdomesticinvestment 10.8 10.6 11.8 4.2 92 o3 9 9s 9 9t

Imports of goods and services 7.3 11.2 9.8 18.2 Exs e bnpooGross national product 8.2 7.9 7.5 5.1

Note: 1997 data are preliminary estmates. I Poverty estimate is from 1990.

The diamonds show four key indicators in the country fin bold) compared with its income-group average. If data are missing, the diamond willbe incomplete.



Project Implementation PlanRevised February 15

A: Preparation Schedule

Task By month/day,Actual 1998 Foreseen

PHRD GrantGrant approved in principle 3/30Request of Bank as executing agency 7/22Grant agreement sent to MoF 7/29MoF countersigning agreement 8/13Effectiveness 9/11Closing date (Normally effectiveness date of the loan) 6/30

Project preparation teamSelection of individuals 7/1Mobilization 7/6Contracts signed 7/28Field trips for rapid assessments 7/31Clarifications on project concept 7/31Office facilities completed 8/14Agreement on project concept 10/15End of contract 2/28

Urban poverty identificationDefine kabupatens to be assisted first year (in principle, north Java) 8/10Ask levels I (Java) to identify poor urban kecamatans 8/21Estimate urban population, by province and kabupaten 9/15Estimate funding to allocate per province/kabupaten 9/28Identification of poor kelurahans/size 9/28

Circulars and dissemination of informationDraft 5 page description of program (English) 8/7Draft I page circular for RWs (English) 8/7Final version, circular Indonesian 10/30 2/28Brochure, English and Indonesian (Annex 2) 3/8Local language versions (by province at the most (?))Text for initial presentation at kecamatan/kelurahan 2/28Request quotations for printing circular 8/17 2/25Request quotations for printing brochure 10/5 3/9Print 3000 brochures, 6000 (?) circulars 3/14Distribute circulars, brochures to Bappedas, agencies (at training) 3/15-4/2Post in Internet, indicating program starting dates by location 4/1

BudgetsPrepare project items cost estimates 10/15Bappenas to prepare budget request 11/16MoF budget approval 12/7 ?MoF to prefinance advances OC. NMC 4/2 and 19Information to KPKNs 5/17


Actual Foreseen

Funds available from credit 5/28 (earliest)MoF to recover advance 6/15 ?

Project ManualDraft Manual (in Indonesian) 9/30

eligibility criteria to access fundsfacilitator availabilitydisbursement flows/proceduresagreement formats for fund recipientsreporting formats by facilitators, oversight consultants, PMDbookkeeping, for groups and Kelurahan

Final Manual agreed 2/19Copies to MoHA (10) 2/20Printing (200 copies) 3/1Printing 2200 copies 3/22

Channeling bank(s)Select, agree with, the bank(s) and MoF 10/23 2/2Send letter to BRI with procedures 3/12The bank(s) to prepare instructions to branches in selected kecamatans 4/19Inform relevant branches 5/17Receive initial advance based on implementation agreements 6/15

Coordination with MoHA, etc.Inform TkII of the program and their role 8/22Select PjOK 12/15Training arrangements 12/1Training manual for government staff 3/8Training in W- C -E Java (100 persons each location) 3/15-19; 22-26; 3/29-4/2

Oversight consultants recruitmentIdentify provincial newspapers 8/7Prepare ad for provincial newspapers (Java's 5 provinces) 8/10Publish ad for expressions of interest 8/11Receive expressions of interest 9/15Prepare 9 short list of firms 9/30Invite bids by fax 10/2Estimate numbers of consultants needed 10/5Prepare TORs, LOI and evaluation criteria, standard draft contract 10/5Request nol 10/7Distribute concept note, circular, TORS, etc. 10/12Hold bid explanation meeting with firms 10/19-22Receive bids 11/9 - 16Evaluate bids 2/15Bank's nol 2/18Notify winners 2/19 - 26Discuss price 2/23 - 3/5Draft contracts (9) 3/1 - 8Bank's nol 3/12Sign 9 contracts 3/15-16Bank's nol for disbursement (subject to Board approval of project) 3/30MoF prefmance mobilization advance 4/2Mobilization of OC for training 4/15


Actual ForeseenTraining for oversight consultants and officialsAsking for expressions of interest of trainers 10/15TORs 10/20Obtaining proposals from 5 providers 10/27 2/20Contracts with trainers 2/22Advance to trainers 2/24Preparation of draft training materials by trainers 3/8Exercises in understanding the Manual 3/8How to train facilitators 3/15Select training venues 1/30Training of trainers 3/22-31

Train consultants, (officials), facilitators in provincial workshops, program aspectsWest Java and Jakarta (5 teams) 4/9East Java (5 teams)Central Java and Yogyakarta (5 teams)Other (?)

Training of facilitators in bookkeeping, etc.WJ 4/16EJCJ

Facilitators and consultants to be available in KelurahanWJ 4/19 -5/3EJCJ

Management consultantsAdvertise for expressions of interest 10/6Prepare TORs, LOI and evaluation criteria 10/10Prepare draft contract 2/20Receive expressions of interest 10/30Short list of firms and nol 2/20Invite bids 2/21Hold explanation meeting 2/25Receive bids 3/22Evaluate bids 3/26Bank's nol 3/31Notify winner 12/11Negotiate contract 4/2Bank nol 4/9Final contract 4/12Bank nol 4/14Advance by MoF 4/19Mobilization of consultants 5/1

Prepare data base format for the project 5/30

Bank processing stepsProject Concept Document issued 6/15PCD review meeting 6/30Drafting appraisal report 8/7Draft Loan Agreement 8/7Review by task team 8/12Issue package 8/14Decision meeting 8/31Clearance for appraisal and negotiations 9/16Appraisal start 9/28


Actual Foreseen

Appraisal completion memo 10/2Invitation to negotiate/status of negotiations 10/7Negotiations start 10/22Preparation of negotiations completion memo 10/26Revised PID 10/27Request for IDA 12/21Credit agreement draft 2/10Board approval of IDA for Indonesia 3/9Approval of GOI of negotiated "credit" documents 3/10Board presentation 3/23 or 4/1Signing of Credit Agreement 4/2 (Wash) or 4/12 (Jakarta)Credit effectiveness 5/2 (earliest)

Urban Poverty Piroject Schedule 1908 20011 ' 4> -7 -¾A. -'- A 4•.

.... .. . . .."'iPrearav EstaWlhmat Stage by Eclao nStage I anh tg 2 and vaeato at Stag. Iand 2and CeatdtoeDvennetd C.KRMAS dMfr ESpAJIM UVt

4iAAi.. ~~~~~~~~ Stage ~~~~~NMC, 0C Prprtnta tg L..anatiatStgeSeale Stages S .g Eansoad rjn npen ei

cruit Pmqu~alif an shr xs 'rCs i~ Reri 0 n ndFnttti 4t t - I dtlr,5 CII __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

recoit regnaifyan ahdCst for Stage 1

contrct with OCt tor Stag 1IM... .....Cnotrac with OCs ta Stage 2

Preparaton Team RevlFclttrPeider -recmit -- Nepotiatioe and direct AppointmentTrainingNPoviders i) Bank's NOL

Contasts with Training providersprepareSion afterait aeawftentt en togatics

Training providers Wtrtshnp tar Training ProvidersL.2.u.pirepareF.aciitat.ors Compiling Trainieg Modules.and Gev. Stagf si Recrit and train FacilitatornhApparot by TP -- - ---

PrOetStrIt up Vodkstropo.Recruit and Itrai reanngtciatryOCs -

Prepartban Team P aitetva M:i-recui NMC 01 Bidding and evatloitn

Banks NOLNMC.s Contrast

P-M))_ecuit MOCb(sj RecritContact with IVEC(s)

tlompementiton StyeI-atrKlc70 pop.(1300 Kelarah.n) _h-

in S stages IStage 2- Pantura c7itit(1540)--------taga 3- South Java (1450) ,

Ty ain --- by OAstivifies in Secialisehat ionneuohe y0Kelurahssim Drsse~minahon by Fsaciitators

Formation ot KSM, BKM, etcPen eeagnMatedi Pelatrhan oleh KMWRecrit, soclatse and train -last belch teaiti(tator eovn ui Complille KSM & BKM prupoes fliliImt,lemevlatiav ot KSMI_SKM actisities mp pn q q

_________ Prepare Govnvmmet StaRfPrepare O&M arrngements 1____H h t

-Supervision 51f implementaitl ..on....mu r Form Urban Forum at Thil (kec. in Jakarta)..L- ~.s Evaluatin I Reporing Adjustment __ o _> -1o oj

Completion ot JCrdiat impn et0nwidC tr-PM)) INMC's Develop and impl ement Imain astiiti.s 4) FormraLEtaluLhne pest

Adjusten I1poetdesign tar next SIege

P~repamLbnin and laanh of project nest Stago

Catatan i -

_______________ 51 Lihat ladwal_tnitnc_U ~natnKagiatan Fasiltater Prvirder _


ANNEX 12Format

UPP SUBPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT No..............

IN KABUPATEN KECAMATAN KELURAHAN

SPAPB No.: / /199Date:Location:

A. We the undersigned:

I. PjOK*: Name: ................................................Title: .....................................Agency/address: ................................................

2. Representative of Name .subproject group**: Title:.

Address:

* authorized to act on behalf of the Government of Dati IIby assignment letter dated ................. , No.** Lurah in the case of infrastructure subprojects

B. Both parties agree:

i. Subproject definition. The beneficiary group will undertake the activities as described in the attachedproposal # . that is an integral part of this agreement. All group members are collectivelyresponsible. General conditions of the agreement, overleaf

2. Cost and financingtotal cost: Rp.financing: self financing: cash Rp.

in kind: Rp.from kelurahan grant, Rp.

advance from grant: Rp ............................... upon agreement signinginterim payment: Rp ....................... upon approval of progress reportsfinal payment: Rp .(20%, upon subproject completion)

expected completion date ..........................

Grant financing to be available from KF BRI account:Address: .........................................................Account No.: .........................................................

(5 copies of agreement, I copy with Rp. 2,000 duty stamp for KPKN)

Signed by group members overleaf

Group representative PjOK


C. General Conditions of the Agreement

Duties of the Kelurahan Forum leader/ Lurah

I. The Kelurahan Forum and/or Lurah shall ensure a) the group members are eligible, b) that the subproject has beenselected in accordance with the program criteria; c) that the OC has countersigned the proposal; d) that cumulativeapproved subproject funding does not exceed the kelurahan grant.

Duties of the Cormnunity Group

1. Implement the activities in accordance with the proposals, and the envirommental and resettlement guidelines, asnecessary, attached to the agreement. Provide own funds in the amounts and timing as indicated in the proposal.

2. Project Reporting: the KF agrees to provide a 2 page progress report every month to the PjOK, and allow othergovernment, World Bank and other representatives to access records and visit the sites. A short completion reportwill be prepared.

3. If an activity is not carried out after funds are received,

3.a. If due to Force Majeure, that is an event which obstructs or damages work outside the control of the group, suchan event must be reported to the oversight consultant within 7 days, and a decision taken within 14 days.

3.b. If a trigger benchmark indicates that it is better to drop the activity, such a decision must be reported to theoversight consultant within 7 days and a decision taken within 14 days.

3.c. If due to negligence, the oversight consultant shall review and deternine the course of action; the advance mayhave to be reimbursed by the group immediately as to be determiined.

3.d. In all cases, the second (final) disbursement will be revised.

4. Audits: the KF/groups have to allow audits as decided by BPKP; if audits indicate that funds were misused (i.e.,for other purposes than intended), then the group has to reimburse the amount, or failing this. For the purpose ofthe audit, the KF/groups will keep Statements of expenditures related to the project for 3 years after its completionor decision to abandon.

Duties of the oversight consultant at the kecamatan/kabupaten

1. The consultant shall a) verify subproject proposal and assist with preparation; b) supervise implementation;c) certify payment documentation.

2. Differences of opinion that may occur between the group/ KF and the Facilitator should be brought inimediately fordiscussion with the oversight consultant, who should settle such differences based on factual evidence and theAgreement. If they entail costs justified in the opinion of the consultant due to changes of original specifications,then an Agreement addendum has to be prepared.

3. Release of any advance requires prior compliance with any land acquisition and a satisfactory environmental plan ifany is required for the subproject. Any required UKL/UPL would be given public disclosure and a conununityconsultation will be sought, and noted. Progress payments also depend on implementation of the environmental plan,if any.


UPP SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL NO.

Group members

Name Address Signature

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9. .....................................................................................


UPP SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL NO.

FOR ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES BY THE COMMUNITYOR

FOR SMALL WORKS/SUPPLIES BY THE COMMUNITY

IN KABUPATEN KECAMATAN KELURAHAN-

Date:

Details on the following are summarized on following pages:

1. Subproject Description:

2. Implementation arrangements:

3. Procurement plan:

4. Land acquisition:

5. Environment impact:

6. Cost, by item and fimding source 1/:

7. Schedule for implementation and funding:

8. Repayment schedule and amounts:

9. Benchmarks, cancellation triggers:

10. Group members:

11. Treasurer of group/bookkeeper:

12. Location of subproject and group address:

13. Small Public Works: Additional General Conditions of Agreement apply.

1/ Including

Group technical assistant fees as to be agreed, if any; profit sharing terms would be indicated, if any.

2% Kelurahan Forum administration fee

Conformed by:

Oversight Consultant Kelurahan Forum Leader Lurah


ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR SMALL WORKS

C. I. Duties of the Group or KF for worksa) Implement the works in accordance with the specifications approved by the oversigh consultant.b) Provide local management (team leader, foreman, administration) and pay at appropriate cost based on the

agreement.

C.2. The works shall not be contracted without approval from the oversight consultant.

C.3. Non-complianceThe group/KF shall be judged negligent if it does not comply with general clauses or does not obey the warnings ofthe Facilitator/Consultant. The oversight consultant shall give written notice to the grouplKF of any non-complianceand send copy to the management consultant and to the PjOK.If within 15 days of receiving a warning the group/KF leader takes no corrective action, then the Facilitator may

propose a KF meeting to review the matter.

C.4. SanctionsIn relation to negligence, payments to the group/KF shall be postponed until the cause of negligence is corrected and

accepted by the consultant in accordance with the Agreement.

C.5. Payment for the works shall be based on the amount of works certified by the consultant in accordance with theAgreement or addendum if any.

C.6. Reporting by the group/KFa) Weekly personnel recordsb) Weekly equipment recordsc) Weekly progress of worksd) Monthly cumulative progress


Documentation for Procurement to be used in Kelurahans(for contract values between Rp. 10 million and Rp. 100 million)

FOR SMALL WORKS/SUPPLIES BY CONTRACTORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Invitation to Bid and Instructions to Bidders .............................. 1General Conditions of Contract ............................. 2Sample Form of Quotation ... 3..........................3Sample Form of Contract/Work Order ............................. 4General Specifications .............................. 5(to be developed per nature of works)

1. INVITATION TO BID

1. I Works:

1.2 Kabupaten/Kecamatan/Kelurahan:

Date No.

1.3 Appointment Procedure

Activity Location Date Hour Remark

1.3.1 Collect Bid Document KF Free of Charge1.3.2 Explain Documents idem Site Visit1.3.3 Submit Bid idem Duty Stamps

Rp.20001.3.4 Evaluate/Negotiate idem1.3.5 Appoint contractor idem Duty Stamps1.3.6 Sign Contract idem Rp.2000

2. INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS

2.0 The contractor will be selected after review of 3 quotations from different sources for local shoppingand 1 quotation for direct contracting, contract values cannot exceed Rp.10 million for directcontracting and Rp. 50,000,000 for local shopping.

2.1 Quotation Form attached.2.2 Contract Form attached.2.3 Attachment to the Quotation Form: Schedule of Activities and Prices2.4 Contract Period: Up to 6 months from the date of signing of Contract.2.5 Type of Contract: Unit Price or Lump Sum, without escalation.2.6 Payment for Achievement (output):

Semi-Monthly: After certification for works completed in 2 week period; the last payment, afterissuing a Certificate of Hand-over.


3. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT WITH CONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS

3.1. Duties of the contract/owner/oversight consultanta) Supervise implementation of works.b) Arrange payment documents for work performed.d) Accept completed works.

3.2. Duties of the Suppliera) Implement the works in accordance with the specifications and technical guidelines provided by the oversight

consultant.b) Provide materials, equipment and personnel; unskilled personnel will be selected from kelurahan residents to the

extent they are interested.

3.3. The works shall not be contracted without approval from the oversight consultant.

3.4. The Supplier must obey existing rules and regulations, and respect local customs.

3.5. Force Majeure is an event outside the control of the KF which obstructs or damages the work. Such an event mustbe reported to the Facilitator within 7 days. The oversight consultant may agree to costs resulting therefrom, andprepare an agreement addendum if needed.

3.6. Differences of opinion that may occur between the Supplier and the group should be brought for discussion with theFacilitator immediately. Settlement of such differences shall be decided by the consultant based on factual evidenceand the Agreement. If they entail costs justified in the opinion of the consultant due to changes of originalspecifications, then a contract addendum has to be prepared.

3.7. Non-compliance by the SupplierThe Supplier shall be judged negligent if it does not comply with clauses 3.2. or 3.4. or does not obey the warningsof the Contract Owner or Facilitator. The KF or consultant shall give written notice to the Supplier of any non-compliance.

3.8. Sanctionsa) In relation to negligence of the Supplier under clause 3.7., payments to the Supplier shall be postponed until the

cause of negligence is corrected and accepted by the KF or Facilitator in accordance with the Contract.b) If within 7 days of receiving a warning under clause 3.7. the Supplier takes no corrective action, the KF may

terminate the contract and appoint a third party to carry it out.

3.9. Payment for the works shall be based on the amount of works certified by the KF/consultant in accordance with thecontract or addendum if any,

3.10. Reporting by the Suppliera) Weekly personnel records.b) Weekly equipment record.c) Weekly progress of works.d) Monthly cumulative progress.

Attachment I -Bid FormAttachment 2 - Agreement Form


QUOTATION for INVITATION #.........

To: The Project Manager (PjOK) of the Urban Poverty Project

1. Having examined the Quotation Documents, comprising the Invitation to Bid, the Instruction toBidders, the General Conditions and Technical Guidelines in the Project Manual, related to thefollowing works:

DescriptionofWorks

I/We the undersigned offer to implement the whole of the said works in conformity with the aforesaiddocuments for the sum of:

Rp1(in words)

As detailed in the Attachment to the Quotation showing schedule of Activities and

2. I/We undertake to commence the works on the date of signing the Contract and to complete and tohand-over the works comprised in the contract within the period stated in the bid document.

3. This Quotation is valid for one month from its date.

Date:

Supplier Name: _

Address:

Supplier Signature


UPP CONTRACT AGREEMENTfor

WORK/SUPPLIES by CONTRACTORS

KF:Address:

SPABP No.: Date:Implementation Agreement No.: Date:

IN KABUPATEN KECAMATAN KELURAHAN

No.: / /199Date:Location:

A. We, the undersigned:1. NAME:

TITLE: Project Manager of the Works-KFADDRESS: J1.hereinafter referred to as the FIRST PARTY.

Authorized to act on behalf of the Government Dati II Kabupaten as Employer, by assignment letter dated:No.:

2. NAME: (Supplier)TITLE: (Director)ADDRESS: 31.hereinafter referred to as the SECOND PARTY.

B. Both parties agree to enter into Contract as the result of tendering::a. Type of Works:b. Location:c. Description:d. Value of Agreement: Rp. in words)e. Execution-period: calendar days from the date of signing the agreement, without

warranty period.f. Payment: Up to 20% advance to be netted out of payments of the first 2 months. Payments every 2

weeks proportional to physical progress as stated in bills certified by the consultant andthe fmnal hand-over.

h. Condition forExecution: As stated in the attached General Conditions of Agreement

i. Miscellaneous: - 5 copies of agreement, I copy with Rp. 2,000 duty stamp for KPKN.- Copy of contract shall be sent to PjOK.

SECOND PARTY FIRST PARTY Acknowledged bySupplier KF/group Consultant

( __ _ _) ( __ _ _) (__ )



LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT GUIDELINES

Introduction

GOI regulations relevant to land acquisition, resettlement and compensation, that would guide theagencies for this project as they do for others, are:

a) Keppres 55/1993 pertaining to land provision for development for public interest;b) Implementing Regulation for Keppres 55/1993, #1/1994 of the Min.of Agri./Nat'l Land Agency (BPN);c) Regulation 4/1991 of the Min.of Land/head of BPN regarding land consolidation;d) Letter 410-4245/1991 of the Min. of Land /head of BPN, ande) Circular 410-1078/1996 of the Min.of Agriculture/head of BPN on technical guidelines for land

consolidation.

In general, where a proposal entails land or asset acquisition, the project agency/group shall ensure thatany persons affected negatively by the proposed subproject are compensated such that their incomes and assetsare restored or improved under the subproject.

Basic principles

The basic principles for the project are:

i) proposals should avoid or minimize land and asset acquisition as well as involuntary resettlement. Theyshould have explored viable alternative designs to minimize displacement.

ii) under approved proposals, any negatively affected person, under any tenure category, should be given faircompensation determined through consultation and agreement between the affected party and the projectgroup.

iii) the affected person should be able to choose the type of compensation, in the form of cash or in kind; thelevel should be based on current market prices or updated NJOP (tax base) values for their property, forcash compensations, and should provide land and housing at least equal to the replaced ones, whencompensation is in kind.

iv) proposals that would affect 200 persons or more require a full LARAP (land acquisition and resettlementaction plan). (Such subprojects would normally entail long lead times, and are expected to be beyond thescope of the project.)

v) there shall be no land acquisition under the project through land consolidation procedures.

Procedures

i) proposals have to indicate the need for land acquisition, the estimated size and number of persons affected,and the estimated budget required for compensation. Such identification can be conducted in parallel withthe AMDAL (see environmental guidelines).

ii) proposals approved in principle by the consultant that require land acquisition, shall be complemented asnecessary with a LARAP (Land acquisition and resettlement action plan) and indication of the budgetsource for the required compensation (proceeds of the kelurahan grant cannot be used for compensation),carry the approval by the relevant kabupaten agency head. The consultant shall seek the Bank's approval ofthe LARAP and budget, and seek modifications in case the Bank finds they are needed.

iii) any LARAP or compensation shall be completed satisfactorily prior to the start of any construction work.The implementing group will report progress regularly to the PMU, that in turn will inform the Bank.

Sanctions

If it is found that the guidelines were not complied with, then funding for the subproject will becancelled and the Kelurahan will not be eligible for any other financing under the project.

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project: PAD


ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES

Introduction

The proposed project has been classified-as a Bank environmental category B, as any negative impacts areexpected to be minor. Any physical works under the project are expected to be small, and their impact, positive onthe municipalities.

GOI regulations relevant to environmental management, that would guide the agencies for this project asthey do for others, are:

i) Government Regulation Number 51 of 1993 Regarding Environmental Impact Assessment;ii) KEP-39/MENLHJ8/1996 Concerning the Types of Businesses or Activities Required to prepare an Environmental

Impact Assessment (ANDAL);iii) KEPMEN PU-481/KPTS/1996 Concerning Decisions on the Types of Activities in the Field of Public Works that are

Required to Prepare UPL and UKL;iv) KEP-12/MENLHI3/1994 Concerning General Guidelines for Environmental Management and Monitoring Procedures;v) KEPMEN PU No. 296/KPTS/1996 Technical Guidelines on the Preparation of UKL and UPL for Projects in the Field

of Public Works;vi) KEP-14/MENLH/3/1994 Concerning General Guidelines for the Preparation of Environmental Impact Assessments;vii) KEPMEN PU No. 58/KPTS/1995 Concerning Establishment of Guidelines for the Management of AMDAL in the

Department of Public Works.

The Bank's Operational Directive on Environmental Assessment (O.D.4.01), which in general is in line withGOI's AMDAL process for public projects, shall also be followed by the agencies where a proposal entails anynegative environmental impact, to ensure that it is mitigated or avoided satisfactorily. No new environmentalmanagement procedures are proposed. The Bank also requires public disclosure of environmental reports (BP 17.50,Disclosure of Operational Information).

Basic principles

The basic environmental principles are:

i) proposals should avoid or minimize negative environmental impacts. They should have explored viablealternative designs to minimize the impact;

ii) the proposal should fit into the General Spatial Plan (RUTR), and avoid protected areas so designated by theMinistry of the Environment (attachment 1 to this annex) unless the proposal improved a protected area;

iii) proposals entailing a negative environmental impact, shall be complemented by an environmental plan tomitigate the impact.

Procedures

Tnere are three key stages (studies for the proposal, design and implementation), all three involving publicconsultation. The procedures at each stage are summarized below (a checklist for the agency is in attachment 2):

In an initial screening, the project type, scale, location, and sensitivity, and the nature and magnitude ofpotential impacts, will be identified to classify the proposal in one of 4 categories:

i) those that require environmental management and monitoring plans (UKL and UPL)based on limited but sitespecific studies. The Ministry of Public Works has set criteria to determine the need for UKL/UPL, and the

Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project; PAD

Ministry of the Environment has set criteria for ANDAL. Both sets are combined in attachment 2 to thisannex;

ii) those for which standard operating procedures (SOP) suffice, where generic good practice would protect theenvironment adequately. DG Cipta Karya and DG Bina Marga have SOP guidelines for some types ofprojectsl;

iii) those that require no environmental study, where no construction, disturbance of land or water or dischargeof pollutants are involved;

iv) those that require a full environmental assessment (ANDAL) plus environmental management plan (RKL),unless the ANDAL and the RKL were the innovations (due to the small financing for the proposals, none isexpected to be in this category for implementation).

In the design stage:

i) the fit with urban planning and the environmental study, if these are needed, should be approved by theBappeda and Bapedalda prior to submission to the PMU;

ii) the environmental management should be incorporated into the designs, tender documents and contracts;iii) standard field inspection, operating guidelines and management and monitoring for municipality staff (or

private sector operators) should be clear;iv) the institutional arrangements for implementation and funding sources should be indicated in the proposal.

Implementation would proceed after the proposal is approved by the PMU and the Bank,

Public participation

For projects for which ANDALs must be prepared, GOI's regulations require public disclosure ofinformation about the project and opportunities for public comments before a final decision is taken. There are noprovisions for public participation in UKL/UPL preparation. The Bank requires public disclosure also of UKL/lUPLs,and encourages participation of NGOs and affected communities in all project planning. Municipalities are advisedto provide a mechanism to receive and respond to complaints from the public for any subproject that may causeenvironmental or social impacts.

Attachment 1List of Protected Areas

The Decree of the Minister of State for the Environment of the Republic of Indonesia Number KEP-39/MENLH/8/1996 Concerning the Types of Businesses or Activities Required to Complete an EnvironmentalImpact Assessment prescribes that any business or activity that is located in a protected area or that may change thepurpose and/or designation of a protected area shall be required to prepare an ANDAL. It includes:

i) forest protection areas: i) river edges;ii) marine/freshwater conservation areas; ii) nature tourism parks;iii) peat areas; iii) areas surrounding lakes and reservoirs;iv) coastal mangrove areas; iv) cultural reserves;v) water catchment areas; v) areas surrounding springs;vi) national parks; vi) scientific research areas;vii) coastal edges; vii) nature conservation areas;viii) forest parks; viii) areas susceptible to natural hazards.

Such as measures to control dust, noise and traffic at construction sites, specifications for backfilling and revegetatingdisturbed areas to prevent erosion; procedures to control negative impacts at solid waste transfer stations; etc.

Indonesia: U,oan PLovroy Proj,ct PAD Page 64

Subprojezt Sle enlig Criteria

Sectors au Pdrojects Units ANDAL UKL/UPL

Wrat r S ugp ly __ __ _ __ _ __ _ _________::________________

Raw water intake s 500 500 - 100

Transmission (large towns) km 5 5 -2Distribution (large towns) ha 1500 1500 - 250

.Urban roads :_ _ .______:___ __L_::__ _ _ _

New construction:a. Large towns km; or ha 5 5 - 1; or 5 - 2b. Medium towns km 10 10 - 3c. Small towns (villages) km 25 25 - 5widening (large towns) km; or ha 5 5 - 1; or 5 - 2 (if land acquisition)Bridges in large towns m - 2 20Bridges in small towns m - 2 60

Wastewater & sanitiidon I

IPLT ha 10 10-5Sewerage system ha 500 500 - 100IPAL ha 10 10 - 5

-Solid Waste Management I ________________________

Sanitary landfill (TPA) m3d 1000 1000 - 200TPA (in tidal area) m3 /d 700 700 - 150Transfer station m3/d 2000 2000 - 500Drainage & flood control ____i_:_

a. In large towns km; or ha 5 5 - 1; or 5 - 2b. In medium towns km 10 10 - 3c. In small towns (villages) km 25 25 - 5Kapung Improvement =E___i_________________New development ha 200 200 - 25Upgrading ha 5 5-2

Sources: KEP-39/ME4NLHI8/1996 for ANDALKEPMEN PU-48 1/KPTS/1 996 for UKL/UPL

Attachment 2Environmental Checklist for Appraisal

i) Has the subproject been properly screened in accordance with criteria in Attachment 2?ii) Has the appropriate environmental study been prepared and approved by the environmental agency concerned?iii) Are any environment-related licenses or permnits required (e.g. H.O.?) and, if so, have they been issued?iv) Does the study include an adequate description of the subproject, with maps and drawings as appropriate?v) Does the study describe the aspects of the environment that could be adversely affected by the subproject and identify all of

the likely impacts?vi) Do the management and monitoring plans (UKL/UPL) contain specific, clearly defined actions to respond to all potential

adverse impacts of the subproject?vii) Is the implementing agency identified for each action in the UKL and UPL, and are the funding source and budgetary

commitmnent clear?viii) Has the municipality accepted the recommendations in the environmental study and agreed to implement them?ix) Do plans, contracts and tender documents contain the appropriate elements of the UKL/UPL or SOP?x) Were adequate opportunities provided for the public participation in subproject planning and cormment on the study?

MAP SECTION

PACiFiC OCEAN ~~INDONESIA-JAWALAY S~hA_.~ a URBAN POVERTY PROJECT

KABUPATENSK(JAWMABARAT) KBPTN(JWTEGPROJECT KABUPATENS

I S I A 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~PROJECT KABUPATENS ® PROVINCE (PROPINSI) CAPITALS

INDIAN OCEAN ® ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~NATIONAL CAPITALA~~~ US RALIA -~~~~~~~~~~~~DISTRICT (KABUPATEN) BOUNDARIES

PROVINCE (PROPINSI) BOUNDARIES1050 0010018

SUMA R

1~~~~~~~~~DKI 1090gon 110ieon10iacp1.Suoai G} e 1110cta 112. 113dwos 21140o

3. Boqor 13. Sumedang 3. Purbalingga 13. Karanganyar 23. Temanrqgung 3. Trenggalek 13. Probolinggo hundaee, lere desenietioe andany ihe. Tubaana

4. Sukabumi 4 Indramayu 4. Baniarnegara 14. Sragen 24 Kenda 4. Tulungogung 14. Posuruan 24. Lamongaennhh espdnoln,pIn e thepar of he orldBan

5. Cianjur 15 Subonq 5. Kebumen 15. Grobogan 25 Batung 5. Blitar 15. Sidoario 25. Gresik~~~~Ga a. ny ed~entn se ega sttesof nyesiery oran

70 Garut er.! Karawang 7.2Wonosobo ,7. Rembong 27. Pemalong ;Z. Malong 17. Jombo 27 Sampang

KABU PATE NS(D.I. YOGYAKARTA)

1. Kulon Progo 1 OYKRA3 ''oBL

2 Bantul3 Gunung Kidul10018 0'1011012130104 Sleman

KABUPATENS (JAWA BARAT) KABUPATENS (JAWA TENGAH) KABUPATENS (JAWA TIMUR)

1 .Pandeglang 1 1. Cirebon 1. Cilacap I11. Sukoharjo 21. Demak 1. Pacitan 11. Bondowoso 21. Ngawi2. Lebak 12. Maialenka 2. Banyumas 12. Wonogiri 22 Semarang 2. Ponorogo 12. Situbondo 22. Bajonegoro3. Bogor 13. Sumedang 3. PurBalingga 13. Karanganyar 23. Temanbgung 3. Trenmbalek 13. Probolinggo 93. Tuban. 4uni eran 4. Baniarnegara 1. Sra 24Kenda A. Tulungagung 14. Pasuruan 2A. Lamongan

Suk iabnlumi 14 Indrm 5. Kebumen 15. Grobogan 25. Batang 5. Blitar 15. Sidoario 25. Gresik5.Canung wuanprt 6. Purworeo 16. Blora 26 Pekalongan 6Keii1.Mokro 26. Bangkalan

~ Ban~~~g 16. Purwa Karta7. Wonosobo i 17 Rembang 27. Pemalang 7. Malang 17. Jombang 27. Sampang7. Garut I /. Karawang 8 aeag IaPf 8. Tasikmalaya , eai .Mglag1 Pt , Tegal 8. Lumajang 18. Nganj'uk 23 aeaa9. Ciamis 19. Tangerang 9. Boyolali 19. Kudus 29 Brebes 9. Jember 19. Madiun 29. Sumenep

~~ 10. Kuningan 20 Serang 1 0. Klaten 20 Jepara 10. Banyuwangi 20. Magetan 30 Kodya Surabaya to

0o10

c

World Bank Document...CAS Country Assistance Strategy GOI Govemment of Indonesia INPRES Presidential...

Documents

Transcript of World Bank Document...CAS Country Assistance Strategy GOI Govemment of Indonesia INPRES Presidential...