Workshop to analyse and discuss the preliminary results …€¦ · Workshop to analyse and discuss...
Transcript of Workshop to analyse and discuss the preliminary results …€¦ · Workshop to analyse and discuss...
Workshop to analyse and discuss the preliminary results of NEMO in CMIP6 - 19 January 2017 In Grenoble
Organizer: NEMO System Team
Supported by European project IS-ENES2
Last edited 01/18/17 19:20:02 by clevy
Location:
|LGGE 54 rue Molière, Campus of Universite Grenoble-Alpes, Saint Martin d'Heres, Grenoble, France Salle Lliboutry
How to get there:
Take the Tramway line B (green line) towards Gieres - Plaine des Sports and get off at "Les taillées -université" stop, or Tramway line C (magenta line) toward Condillac-Universites and get out at "Hector Berlioz" stop. The LGGE building is nearby, see map in link above.
The ride is approximately 22 minutes from the train station. The Grenoble train station is located at the "Gares" stop and Grenoble city center is located between the "Victor-Hugo" and "Sainte-Claire Les Halles" stops.
Motivations
All the groups involved in the CMIP6 experiments are now setting up and testing their configurations (ESM or forced ocean in OCMIP). For those using NEMO or part of it as
Motivations
All the groups involved in the CMIP6 experiments are now setting up and testing their configurations (ESM or forced ocean in OCMIP). For those using NEMO or part of it as ocean, sea-ice and or biogeochemical component, it appears to be useful to share the analysis of their preparatory simulations in order to identify the robust results, the weaknesses and possible improvements.
The main subject will be to share our experiences and results on ...As for the first meeting, the idea is not to advertise widely this meeting, but rather to share expertise (and possible mistakes!) between the groups directly concerned with this NEMO in CMIP6 work.
Goals
Comparing results of NEMO in mainly 2 different global resolutions in different experiments, i.e forced or coupled with different atmospheric models can allow us to better understand and hopefully correct some biais by discriminating the adjustments of the coupled mode from the internal errors of the ocean model.
NEMO configurations in play :
All groups are expected to be using nemo.v3_6_STABLE version of the platform. The configurations should be the ones used in CMIP6. The list below describes geographical extension and model resolution. All combination of NEMO components: dynamics, with or without NEMO sea-ice (LIM) or biogeochemistry(PISCES) are welcome.ORCA1, ORCA025, …
Invited groups
In order to facilitate extensive discussions on strengths and weaknesses of the results, we propose not to open the meeting widely, but to decide the list of invited groups. All users registered on shaconemo have been contacted.
Proposed agenda
The agenda is organised to share and discuss the results: no sequence of presentations but rather a list of subjects to be discussed by sharing and comparing results of all the available simulations. Please bring your latop, and access to data/plots. Prerequisite is to have the list of experiments available prior to the meeting (please complete, see below).Please complete the list of subjects below by adding :
The subjects on which you would like to show your thoughts or results (and add your name on the line) The subjects on which some inputs of other groups would help (you)
[Time in CET = Grenoble time]
08:30 - 9:00 Welcome coffee
9:00 - 10:30 Methods and principles (Leaders of the session: Matthieu Chevallier & Adam Blaker)
How to properly couple an atmosphere model with an ocean-sea ice model with "enhanced" vertical resolution near surface (ie 1m vs 10m)? Coupled/forced modes: ensuring a clean comparison between the two modes - what choices/compromises have to be made? Coupled mode: closing the ocean energy budget... Coupled mode: representing calving around Antarctica : technical solution and effects in IPSLCM607
"enhanced" vertical resolution near surface (ie 1m vs 10m)? Coupled/forced modes: ensuring a clean comparison between the two modes - what choices/compromises have to be made? Coupled mode: closing the ocean energy budget... Coupled mode: representing calving around Antarctica : technical solution and effects in IPSLCM607
10:30 - 11:00 Coffee break
11:00 - 12:30 Adjustments and tuning (Leaders of the session: Julie Deshayes & L. Brodeau)
ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: obtaining a realistic North Atl. circulation, i.e, return of deep conv. in Lab. Sea, get rid of fresh/cold surface bias, and AMOC > 12 Sv ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: getting the mixed layer depths right (min. and max.) ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: how to reduce biases at 1000m deep in Atlantic (too warm, too salty) ? ORCA1.L75 in coupled/forced mode: classical biases in the North Atlantic Ocean + how to increase Arctic sea ice thickness ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: North Atlantic, Atlantic at depth and ventilation in the austral ocean
12:30 - 1:30 Lunch (in same room)
1:30 - 2:30 Adjustments and tuning cont' (see above)
2:30 - 3:30 Finding solutions for data requests burden (Proposed leaders of the session: ?? )
Status and tests for dr2xml parser communication
4:00 (at the latest): End of meeting
List of participants :PLEASE UPDATE
Family Name First name Institution email
Please list your location if you intend to use videoconference
Lévy Claire CNRS - NEMO System Team
Chevallier Matthieu CNRM (Meteo France) matthieu.chevallier@… Grenoble
Brodeau Laurent Barcelona Supercomputer Center
laurent.brodeau@…
Kuhlbrodt Till NCAS, University of Reading
t.kuhlbrodt@… Reading, UK
Blaker Adam NOC atb299@… Nurser George NOC g.nurser@… Msadek Rym Cerfacs rym.msadek@… Deshayes Julie CNRS IPSL julie.deshayes@… Grenoble Rousset Clement CNRS clement.rousset@… Grenoble
Moine Marie-Pierre Cerfacs moine@… maybe visio from
Toulouse
Voldoire Aurore CNRM aurore.voldoire@… maybe visio from Toulouse (Cerfacs)
Person Renaud CNRS IPSL renaud.person@… Grenoble Ethe Christian CNRS IPSL Christian.Ethe@… Grenoble Vancoppenolle Martin CNRS IPSL martin.vancoppenolle@… Lille, Visio
Mignot Juliette CNRS IPSL juliette.mignot@… Berlin, Visio
Person Renaud CNRS IPSL renaud.person@… Grenoble Ethe Christian CNRS IPSL Christian.Ethe@… Grenoble Vancoppenolle Martin CNRS IPSL martin.vancoppenolle@… Lille, Visio
Mignot Juliette CNRS IPSL juliette.mignot@… Berlin, Visio perhaps
Mainsant Gildas CNRS IPSL gildas.mainsant@… Grenoble Bricaud Clement Mercator cbricaud@… Grenoble Bourdallé Romain Mercator rbourdal@… Grenoble Sellar Alistair UKMO / UKESM alistair.sellar@… Exeter Jones Colin NCAS / UKESM colin.jones@… Exeter Iovino Dorotea CMCC dorotea.iovino@… Bologna Yool Andrew NOC axy@… Southampton
Favorite questions and subjects to discuss
Please complete
Who What
L. Brodeau ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: obtaining a realistic North Atl. circulation, i.e, return of deep conv. in Lab. Sea, get rid of fresh/cold surface bias, and AMOC > 12 Sv !
Till Kuhlbrodt ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: getting the mixed layer depths right (min. and max.), with a view on running NEMO with a biogeochemistry
Adam Blaker ORCA1.L75 in coupled/forced modes: ensuring a clean comparison between the two modes - what choices/compromises have to be made?
Julie Deshayes ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: how to reduce biases at 1000m deep in Atlantic (too warm, too salty) ?
Matthieu Chevallier
ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: how to properly couple an atmosphere model with an ocean-sea ice model with "enhanced" vertical resolution near surface (ie 1m vs 10m)? Issues encountered with air-ice fluxes, ocean-ice fluxes, high frequency coupling...
Matthieu Chevallier & Rym Msadek
ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: closing the ocean energy budget...
Rym Msadek ORCA1.L75 in coupled/forced mode: classical biases in the North Atlantic Ocean + how to increase Arctic sea ice thickness
Juliette Mignot ORCA1.L75 in coupled mode: North Atlantic, Atlantic at depth and ventilation in the austral ocean
Detailed list of experiments in discussion :
PLEASE UPDATE
Institution / Name of PI
Components in play (ORCA1 or ORCA025,
NEMO-OPA, NEMO-LIM or GELATO or CICE, NEMO-TOP or ...
Forced (which forcing), or coupled (which atmosphere)
Specific options if different from shaconemo
Duration of experiment (years)
Comments
Global ~1° Model still to
forcing), or coupled (which atmosphere)
Global ~1°
IPSL ORCA1 LIM3 PISCES Coupled with LMDZ
Model still to be tuned. Ocean options kept as close as possible from Shaconemo. Use of closed seas.
IPSL base version for CMIP6
Met Office/NERC
eORCA1 CICE forced with CORE2
Ocean-only, traceable from eORCA025
68 years Problems with runoff at north fold
Met Office/NERC
eORCA1 CICE Coupled to UM
Ocean/ice configuration fully traceable to ORCA025 GO6, with one adjustment
> 200 years
Basis for UKESM mid 2017. Frozen UK contribution to CMIP6 (including OMIP).
Met Office/NERC
eORCA1 CICE MEDUSA Coupled to UM
Ocean/ice configuration traceable to ORCA025 GO6, with one or two adjustments
Basis for UKESM mid 2017. UK contribution to CMIP6 (including OMIP). Periodically coupled pre-industrial spin-up ongoing
CNRM-CERFACS
eORCA1 NEMOv3.6-GELATO6 coupled with ARPEGEv6-SURFEXv8-CTRIP
close to shaconemo
~160 years with fixed
1990 forcings + ~100 year
PI control
under evaluation
CNRM-CERFACS eORCA1 NEMOv3.6-GELATO6 forced
close to shaconemo
CORE: 1948-2009; DFS5: 1958-2012
under evaluation
IPSL-LOCEAN / Deshayes-Aumont
eORCA1 LIM3 PISCES
forced by CORE2, climato and interannual
60 yr - 500 yr (climato)
still under evaluation / tuning
EC-Earth / Brodeau ORCA1L75 LIM3 forced by
CORE2_CNYF 200 years
SL36C00 (no SSS restoring)
SL36C01 (SSS restoring + nn_ssr=2)
SL36C02 (SSS restoring + nn_sssr=1)Comparison
EC-Earth / FMI ORCA1L75 LIM3 forced by DFS5.2
Sea-ice sensitivity and comparison runs.
nn_sssr=1)Comparison
EC-Earth / FMI ORCA1L75 LIM3 forced by DFS5.2
Sea-ice sensitivity and comparison runs.
EC-Earth / BSC ORCA1L75 LIM3 coupled with IFS 5 years Model blowing up
after 5 years
UCL / Barthélemy ORCA1L75 LIM3
forced by DFS5.2, NCEP or JRA-55; otherwise close to shaconemo
1958-2015 Sea ice sensitivity to the forcing dataset
CMCC ORCA1L50 coupled to CICE/CAM/CLM
EOS80, grid 65 years CMCC base version for CMIP6
CMCC ORCA1L50 + CICE
forced by CORE2 Interannual, EOS80, grid
20 years Evaluation for OMIP (no sss restoring)
Global 1/4°
Met Office/NERC
eORCA025 CICE Coupled to UM
Ocean/ice configuration defined as GO6+GSI8. Limited tuning.
Ocean/ice component of HadGEM3 GC3 - physical model for UKESM. Met Office/UK contribution to CMIP6
Met Office/NERC
eORCA025 CICE MEDUSA coupled to UM
Expected to be GO6 as above. Use DEGRAD for BGC
UKESM 2018 onwards. Physical model GC3. UK contribution to CMIP6 (including OMIP). Ice cavities open?
GEOMAR ORCA025 LIM2 Spatial GM OMIP period Contribution to OMIP
CNRM-CERFACS eORCA025 NEMOv3.6-GELATO6 forced
CORE: 1948-2009; DFS5: 1958-2012
NEMO_v3_6_STABLE
IPSL-LGGE / Deshayes-LeSommer
eORCA025 LIM3forced by DFS, CORE2 interannual
CORE (+10 yr) still under development
Mercator Ocean / Bricaud Bourdalle badie
eORCA025 LIM3_PISCES
forced by ERAi
Erai period (1979-2014)
development / evaluation, not involved in CMIP6, working on coarsening for BCG
FMI ORCA025 LIM3 forced by ERAi
Erai period (1979-2015)
Now in 2012. Mainly for sea-ice evaluation.
BSC-ES ORCA025 LIM3 forced by DFS5.2 1958-1982
Comparison with a ORCA1 simulation: effect on sea ice growth
CMCC ORCA025L50 + forced by CORE2 20 years Evaluation for OMIP
BSC-ES ORCA025 LIM3 forced by DFS5.2 1958-1982 ORCA1 simulation:
effect on sea ice growth
CMCC ORCA025L50 + CICE
forced by CORE2 Interannual, EOS80, grid
20 years Evaluation for OMIP (no sss restoring)
Global 1/12°
BSC ORCA012 LIM3 Forced by DFS5.2
4 months from 01/01/1989
Issues with XIO server and data storage (stopped)
SMHI ORCA1L75 LIM3 coupled to IFS
PD-simulations 20-50 years
Arctic sea ice explodes