Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)
description
Transcript of Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)
![Page 1: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 1
![Page 2: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 2
Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)
• For the few near-fault records that include fling response, should these effects be explicitly removed before developing the initial ground motion models?
YES
• How should fling effects be removed?
WORK IN PROGRESS
![Page 3: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 3
20 40 60 80
-50
0
50
Time (sec)
Vel
ocity
(cm
/sec
)
TCU129, E-W
t1
t2=30 sec
t2=50 sec
t2=70 sec
File
:C
:\m
etu_
03\r
ec_p
roc\
129e
vfit_
colo
r.dr
aw;
Dat
e:20
03-0
9-10
;Ti
me:
14:2
5:09
To model fling we need to accurately recover the residual displacement. Baseline correction of recorded motion is important step.
![Page 4: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 4
0 20 40 60 80 100-200
0
200
400
Time (sec)
Dis
pla
cem
en
t(c
m)
TCU129, E-W
remove mean only
t2 = 30 sec
t2 = 50 sec
t2 = 70 sec
quadratic fit to velocity
low-cut filter only, fc=0.02 Hz
GPS, station AF11
File
:C:\
me
tu_
03
\re
c_p
roc\
12
9e
d4
pp
_co
lor.
dra
w;
Da
te:2
00
3-0
9-1
0;T
ime
:21
:50
:10
Although the results look physically plausible, the residual displacements can
be sensitive to t1, t2
Quadratic fit to velocity gives best fit to GPS residual displacement in this case
![Page 5: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 5
TCU068 displacement record baseline corrected using Boore’s method (modified Iwan) with three choices of t2. For this record there is not much sensitivity to the choice of t2.
t1: acc > 50 cm/sec2
t2(1): Boore v0
t2(2): acc < 50 cm/sec2
t2(3): 2 x t2(2) – t1
![Page 6: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 6
![Page 7: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 7
Sine-pulse fits to the three corrected displacement records. The pulse start times are all very close (33.24, 33.36, 33.42) as are the pulse periods (4.39, 4.12, 3.83). The main difference are the final displacements (617, 570, 528).
![Page 8: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 8
Spectral acceleration for the three tcu068 records with the sine-pulse removed, compared with SA for the original (I.e., with fling) record (magenta line).
1) There is some sensitivity to t2 between 2 and 5 sec period (difference btw red, green and black lines). Max. difference is about 60%.
2) There is a large difference compared to original record, with the fling-removed records actually being much larger than the original record up to about 6-7 sec period.
![Page 9: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 9
Similar analysis for tcu052 record. The sensitivity of baseline correction to t2 is greater than for tcu068. However, the sensitivity in SA for the fling-removed records is less.
![Page 10: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 10
![Page 11: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 11
![Page 12: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 12
![Page 13: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 13
![Page 14: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 14
![Page 15: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 15
![Page 16: Workshop Questions (Nov. 7, 2003)](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110102/568139be550346895da162bd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling 16
Conclusions
• Baseline correction of raw record must be done with care.
• Sine-pulse model for fling is attractive because it provides a time domain parameterization and can be related to the underlying physical process.
• Response spectra for sine-pulse corrected records can show sensitivity to choice of processing parameters-
Is this acceptable? (9 m disp. at TCU068)