Workshop on Project Management and Teamwork for ULS
-
Upload
karen-calhoun -
Category
Business
-
view
674 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Workshop on Project Management and Teamwork for ULS
Credits: Many, but especially:
Human Technology, Inc. 1999.
The complete guide to managing
change and transition.
Amherst, Mass: HRD Press, Inc. and
former colleagues in Cornell’s
Organizational Development group.
WHEN WE FINISH THIS WORKSHOP YOU WILL KNOW
MORE ABOUT:
Initiating projects
Working on a design team (and what that is)
The context, stages and deliverables of our work as a team
Identifying key stakeholders
Sharepoint as a collaborative toolkit
The purpose and characteristics of a Future Search conference
Developing “strategic options”
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR TODAY - 1
Time Topic or Exercise
12:40-12:50 Intro and project initiation
12:50-1:00 First exercise – discussion of a project “charter”
1:00-1:20 Our project teams – what is a “design team” and what do
they do? How does our work relate to achieving the goals
of the ULS Long Term Plan? What are some examples of
“desired outcomes”?
1:20-1:45 Second exercise – preliminary group work on designing
the future state
Group 1 – Environmental scan – what factors are driving
the ULS to change? What data should be considered in
designing the future state?
Group 2 – What does the ULS Long Range Plan tell us
about desired outcomes? What three outcomes (from a
sample list provided) are the most critical to the
realization of the ULS Long Range Plan?
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR TODAY - 2
Time Topic or Exercise
1:45-2:00 Our near term deliverables
2:00-2:30 Third exercise – group work – stakeholder analysis
2:30-2:45 BREAK
2:45-3:00 Do I really have to learn how to use Sharepoint? – Heidi
Card
3:00-3:25 What is a Future Search conference?
3:25-3:50 What is a strategic option? What factors, trends, issues,
opportunities should each TF consider? How will we
develop our first set of recommendations? When are they
due to Senior Staff?
3:50-4:20 Discussion, feedback, action planning, wrap up
4:20-4:30 Reserved time for packing up and getting on the shuttle
PROJECT INITIATION
Authorize expenditure of resources
Assign project manager
Establish roles and responsibilities of project manager
and other participants
Identify high-level goals/objectives
Notify people/organizations affected by project
NOW LET US BE PERFECTLY CLEAR… (A
PROJECT “CHARTER”)
Project name
Project sponsor(s)
Project manager
Statement of purpose—reason for the project
Specific high level project deliverables
Authorized project resources (i.e., people, budget)
Basic project timeline
Constraints or ‘givens’
EXERCISE 1: DOES OUR TF CHARGE ANSWER THESE
QUESTIONS?
1. Who is the project manager?
2. Who is the project sponsor? Does the sponsor know he/she is a sponsor?
3. Who is on the project team?
4. What is the purpose of the project?
5. When the project is done, what will be different? (What are the deliverables?)
6. What human resources are available for the project?
7. What is the basic project timeline?
8. Are there any “constraints” or “givens”? Are these stated or merely implied?
Handout: Copies of TF charge from SP site
A HIGHLY SELECTIVE GLOSSARY OF PROJECT
MANAGEMENT TERMS
• Sponsor – Executive-level position responsible for integrating the
results of the project with the operations of the organization.
• Deliverable – Any item produced as the outcome of a project or a
part of a project. A deliverable is tangible and verifiable.
• Constraint or “given” – A restriction or limitation that influences
the project plan. Up-front design criteria such as “no additional
staff can be added,” “deliverables must be in hand by x date,”
“the focus should be on these types of services,”
“recommendations must be presented in priority order,” and so
on,
WHAT IS A DESIGN TEAM AND WHAT DO THEY
DO? • A group of people responsible for translating a vision into operational (actionable)
terms
• They articulate a clear picture of a desired future state – what it is really going to look like – by providing a blueprint for the organization
• Members are selected for their expertise, ability to influence and work with others, knowledge of the organization and its processes
• Concerned with (1) getting from ideas to actual, specific activities and (2) questions like:
• What new services should be delivered?
• What will changed processes look like?
• What will our new organizational structures look like?
• How will technology be used?
• What roles or responsibilities with people have?
• How will people relate to the communities that we serve?
Handout: too small to read
HOW DOES OUR TASK FORCE WORK RELATE TO
THE “VISION” – THE ULS LONG RANGE PLAN?
Overarching Theme: User-Centered Collections and Services LONG RANGE GOALS OBJECTIVES
Information resources
and collections
• Understand user needs, expectations
Deliver innovation (enhance access)
Stewardship of collections (conservation, preservation)
Infrastructure (space, equipment, systems)
• User-centered renovation of space, equipment, systems
• Closer integration within and across ULS with faculty and departments
Services
• Develop a new service model for reference blending traditional and
digital formats
• Innovate information literacy instruction and assessment
• Innovate access services
Scholarly communication
• Articulate and exemplify new models of scholarly communication
• Partner with faculty and researchers at and beyond Pitt
• Support creation of new digital collections, publishing services, trusted
repositories
Organizational agility
• Increase effectiveness by directing resources to highest priorities (as
indicated by assessment data analysis)
• Monitor and respond quickly to needs
• New skills development
• Recruit and retain professional staff
CROSSING THE CHASM FROM VISION TO REALITY –
DEFINING THE FUTURE STATE IN OPERATIONAL, EXECUTABLE TERMS
WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF “DESIRED
OUTCOMES”? Type of outcome Examples
Business outcomes • Increased usage of facilities,
collections, services
• Increased responsiveness to user
needs
• Reduced cost of operations
• Faster turnarounds
• Full utilization of technologies
“People” outcomes • More work accomplished with same
number of people
• Increased flexibility
• More meaningful work
• More teamwork (or cross-functional
work)
• Better working conditions
“Organizational” outcomes • Alignment to community needs
• Open communications; inclusion
• Rapid, high quality decision making
• Easy coordination, linkage of units
• Culture of assessment
• Culture that supports mission of
university
Group 1 – Environmental scan – what factors are driving the ULS to change? What data should be considered in designing the future state?
Group 2 – What does the ULS Long Range Plan tell us about desired outcomes? What three outcomes (from the sample list provided) are the most critical to the realization of the ULS Long Range Plan?
OUR NEAR-TERM DELIVERABLES – FY13
PLANNING TASK FORCE
October TF meetings
• Investigate and begin to identify FY13 strategic options
October 26
• Future Search conference with selected ULS staff
November to early December
• Submit strategic options analysis to UL and PBC
• Presentation to Admin Council
OUR NEAR-TERM DELIVERABLES – USER
SERVICES TASK FORCE
October TF meetings
•Scan environment to investigate and identify FY13 strategic options
November 2
•Future Search conference with selected ULS staff
November to early December
•Submit strategic options analysis to ULS Sr Staff, FY13 Planning TF. PTDG, PBC
•Presentations TBD
STAKEHOLDERS AND THEIR REQUIREMENTS
AND EXPECTATIONS
• If an organization does not meet the requirements of
its key external stakeholders, it will ultimately fail
• Analyzing who the key stakeholders are and what they
require or expect is critical for determining what and
how to change
• For the purpose of our exercise, stakeholders can be
internal or external to the ULS
IDENTIFYING STAKEHOLDERS
Who is allocating budget? Who makes final decisions about what will be resourced (funded)?
Who will use the results; who benefits?
Who originates? (Whose idea is it?)
Who defines “success”?
Who will feel the impact? Who gains? Who loses?
Who does or will do the work?
Who will maintain the outcome?
Who knows the “big picture”—future direction?
EXERCISE 3: STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS: GET
YOUR POST-ITS!
POWER
CONCERN
High Power
Low Concern
High Power
High Concern
Low Power
Low Concern
Low Power
High Concern
Stakeholders
TAKE A BREAK!
WHAT IS SHAREPOINT?
• SharePoint is Microsoft's collaboration and document
management software often used for organizations' internal
knowledge management.
• In practice we see it as a hybrid - somewhere between a
website, Outlook, a file system and an Intranet.
• SharePoint is web-based and users interact with it via their
web browser
INFORMATION OVERLOAD!
various shared documents
folder structure – if any!
outdated intranet
Outlook public folders: email, documents, &
calendars
some public web pages
paper-based statistics collection
e-mails
Fragmented
internal
Knowledge
Management
structure
WHY SHAREPOINT?
• Consolidate our internal content
• Learn about and use collaboration features for different
groups and across groups
• Reduce paper-based processes and broaden availability of
stats collection
• Explore using Announcement & Discussion features as
alternative to email
SHAREPOINT COMPONENTS & TERMS
Document Libraries
Shared files & folders, incl. photos
Lists
Announcements
Calendars
Tasks
Links
Discussions
Contacts
Custom
Web parts
Main area to view snapshots of content from lists & libraries, rss
feeds, etc.
Presentation: SharePoint in Libraries, John
Heintz & Ben Durrant from the University of St.
Thomas Libraries, retrieved October 10, 2011
from http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/libtech_conf/2010/concurrent_a/17/
FUTURE SEARCH
Structured interviews
Six questions
One of the questions is assigned to you; you will interview 6 people on this question
You need to take notes on the answers to your assigned question!
You will be interviewed on all questions (including the one assigned to you)
OBJECTIVES
Highly interactive, collaborative approach
Gather information from all in short period of time
Identify strategic actions that, if taken, will make greatest positive difference
Develop common ground and shared commitment
AGENDA FOR FUTURE SEARCH CONFERENCE
Arrival and coffee
Welcome and introduction (Karen)
“Future Search” Interviews
Individuals Identify Themes
Break and Social Time
Groups Analyze Data and Prepare Action Proposals
Reporters Present Themes and Action Proposal
Debrief and Wrap Up, Farewells
SIX SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Looking three years into the future, what would you want the university community to be saying about the ULS?
2. What would you say are the major strengths or recent accomplishments of the ULS in accomplishing its mission?
3. What would you say are the major threats, limitations or internal barriers facing the ULS in accomplishing its mission?
4. What new opportunities might the ULS seize over the next two years?
5. What strategies, objectives, projects, programs, or new initiatives should the ULS pursue over the next two years?
6. What are some of the skills and competencies that ULS staff will need to develop further in the coming 2 or 3 years? Which of these skills and competencies will be most important to our continued success?
YOUR QUESTION / YOUR GROUP
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6
Participant
1
2
3
4
5
6
Participant
7
8
9
10
11
12
Participant
13
14
15
16
17
18
Participant
19
20
21
22
23
24
Participant
25
26
27
28
29
30
Participant
31
32
33
34
35
36
ROOM SET UP DIAGRAM: 36 PARTICIPANTS, 6
QUESTIONS
Q2
Q1
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q1
Q2
Q1
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q1
Q2
Q1
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q1
ROW 1 ROW 2 ROW 3
INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFY INTERVIEW THEMES
Sit down by yourself
What is highly characteristic of what my interviewees said to me?
What is somewhat characteristic of what my interviewees said to me?
What are some unique perspectives from my interviewees?
You have 15 minutes (followed by break)
DATA ANALYSIS / ACTION PROPOSALS
Each group break out separately
Identify recorder/reporter and a timekeeper
As a group, compare “highly characteristic,” “somewhat characteristic” themes and consider unique perspectives
Develop an action proposal for FY13
Write your proposal legibly on flip chart sheets
You have 45 minutes
Suggest you split time evenly between data analysis and development of action proposal
1. Looking three years into the future, what would you want the university community to be saying about the ULS?
2. What would you say are the major strengths or recent accomplishments of the ULS in accomplishing its mission?
3. What would you say are the major threats, limitations or internal barriers facing the ULS in accomplishing its mission?
4. What new opportunities might the ULS seize over the next two years?
5. What strategies, objectives, projects, programs, or new initiatives should the ULS pursue over the next two years?
6. What are some of the skills and competencies that ULS staff will need to develop further in the coming 2 or 3 years? Which of these skills and competencies will be most important to our continued success?
1. Write a couple of headlines —then write down what we need to do to make the headlines true.
2. How and in what ways can the ULS use these strengths going forward?
3. What are some of the things that we will need to do differently in the future to continue successfully serving our communities?
4. How should the ULS respond to these opportuntiies?
5. What are the 3 or 4 most important projects or initiatives?
6. Which are the most important and how can we develop these new skills and competencies?
SIX QUESTIONS >> ACTION PROPOSALS
Printed handout for group work at Future Search conferences
Group discussion -
How will we manage
preparing (1) the
questions and (2)
the ULS staff for our
Future Search
conferences?
WHAT IS A STRATEGIC OPTION?
Strategic options are creative, action-oriented responses to the library’s changing environment. They take into account the facts, community needs, trends, opportunities and threats facing the ULS. Strategic options are identified following an organizational assessment that keeps in mind the changing environment, mission and aspirations of the library. The TF will conduct the organizational assessment inclusively by using “Future Search” conferences focusing on (1) public and collections services and (2) the ULS digital library. They will analyze the output of the Future Search conferences to develop and submit a strategic options analysis …
--Charge, ULS FY13 Planning Task Force
FY13 PLANNING TF: FOCUS ON THE ULS
DIGITAL LIBRARY Possible factors, needs, trends, opportunities to consider:
• Digital library users - identifying constituencies (user communities) and their needs,
behaviors, preferences. Assessment and continuous improvement.
• Services for digital library users – delivery, remote access, mobile devices, reference and
outreach services for special or digitized collections, metadata and production services, more
• The collections of digital libraries – licensed and open access, digitized collections, born
digital sources, image collections, data collections, repositories, the library as publisher,
more …
• Organizing access to digital collections – enhancing discoverability/visibility, evolution of the
catalog, DL platforms and management systems, user-centered design, knowledge
organization, more …
• Metadata, standards, interoperability – design, outreach services, ingest and export,
mapping, conversion, sharing and re-using metadata, protocols, more …
• Legal, economic, human factors – IP, copyright, rights management, open access, library
cooperation, social networks, marketing and communications, assessment and evaluation,
more …
Handout: copies of this slide for TF members
USER SERVICES TF: FOCUS ON USER-CENTERED
SERVICE AND SPACE REDESIGN Factors, needs, trends, opportunities to consider:
• Studying user communities, information-seeking behavior, needs, preferences – realigning services accordingly
• Future of service points – combining desks
• “Privileging the user” in library buildings – space redesign
• “Virtual space” redesign – including web site, mobile devices, apps.
• Engagement and outreach with user communities – F2F and virtual
• Future of instruction – partnerships with faculty, instructional design
• Role of the liaison librarian – combining roles, new roles, new job descriptions
• New roles for staff
• Professional training, development, competencies for new roles
• Assessment and continuous improvement
Handout: copies of this slide for TF members
WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO TO DEVELOP OUR
STRATEGIC OPTION RECOMMENDATIONS? 1. Review the ULS Long Range Plan (the vision)
2. Consider: What are the most important problems to be solved or barriers to be removed?
3. Review the TF charge esp. any constraints or ‘givens’ (see slide 8)
4. Analyze the input from the Future Search conferences
5. Then consider the following questions about the ideal future state (pick the ones most relevant to your TF charge) to identify the possibilities:
What new or changed services need to be provided?
What should renovated spaces look like?
What will new or changed organizational structures look like?
What types of key roles or responsibilities will people have?
How will people relate to the communities that the ULS serves?
What new or changed technologies will be used?
6. Review your TF’s stakeholder analysis (try for “wins” for as many stakeholders as possible, and consider possibilities for compensating for “losses”)
7. Prioritize the possibilities and identify the recommended strategic options for making progress toward the ideal future state in operational, executable terms
Handout: copies of this slide for TF members
WHEN IS OUR FIRST DRAFT DUE TO SENIOR
STAFF?
Mid-November
Strategic Options - User Services Task Force
Strategic Options - FY13 Planning Task Force
Strategic options – Thanksgiving
DISCUSSION, FEEDBACK, ACTION PLANNING, FINIS
CC-BY RVWithTito
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rvwithtito/6161674618/