Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home
Transcript of Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home
![Page 1: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
UCD Humanities Institute of
Ireland
Workshop on Norbert Elias
Professor Emeritus Stephen Mennell
![Page 2: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Norbert Elias, 1897–1990
Two peculiarities of his reputation:
• Recognition came right at the end of his life – so he’s in a sense a ‘more recent’ figure than his dates imply
• Though he called himself a sociologist, his work is much wider than conventional sociology today, and he often seems to attract more interest from scholars outside his own discipline
His life-story is relevant to understanding these peculiarities, and his work in general
![Page 3: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Who was Norbert Elias?
![Page 4: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Who was Norbert Elias?
![Page 5: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Who was Norbert Elias?
• Born 1897 in Breslau, which was then in German Silesia, now the Polish city of Wrocław
• Jewish, but very German family
• Anti-Semitism? – he denied experiencing it much, but probably formative experience
• First World War
• University of Breslau – philosophy and medicine
• The row with Richard Hönigswald – certainly formative – rejection of Kantian a priori led to rejection of philosophy per se – ‘post-philosophical’ sociology – chains of generations
![Page 6: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Who was Norbert Elias?
• Great German inflation 1922
• Freikorps street fighting, instability of Weimar Republic
• In meantime, Elias went to Heidelberg as a sociologist, not philosopher
• Alfred Weber, Karl Mannheim
• Frankfurt and the Frankfurt School
• Hitler, 1933: Elias witnessed violent takeover of city and university
![Page 7: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Who was Norbert Elias?
• Exile in Paris, then London – poverty
• All this throws a different light on his theory of “civilising” processes
• Über den Prozess der Zivilisation – written in London, published in Basle in 1939, but not published in English (The Civilizing Process) until 1978–82
• Really sense of civilisation as a thin and fragile veneer
• His mother died in Auschwitz
![Page 8: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Who was Norbert Elias?
• LSE, internment etc.
• Precarious living as extra-mural lecturer
• Group Analysis – important school of psychotherapy
• Finally, at age of 57, obtained job in minor British university, Leicester, in 1954
![Page 9: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Who was Norbert Elias?
• Leicester years: development of theory of knowledge and the sciences (involvement and detachment)
• And pioneered the sociology of sport, with Eric Dunning
• Professor in Ghana, 1962–64 – collection of African art – insightful writings on art too
![Page 10: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
![Page 11: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
![Page 12: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Who was Norbert Elias?
• Fame grew after reissue of Über den Prozess der Zivilisation and first publication of Die höfische Gesellschaft in German, in 1969 – but a decade later in English
• Then a dozen other books, and around 100 articles – see Bibliography handout
![Page 13: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Why The Civilizing Process?
• What was the fundamental sociological problem that Elias wanted to help solve when he began the research on manners and state formation in Europe that led to The Civilizing Process?
• How human habitus changes over many generations – in this case, a mere 500 years in Europe. (Later he was interested in far longer processes – human development as a whole.)
• The e-coli of civilising processes!
![Page 14: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Why The Civilizing Process?
• Habitus is ‘second nature’ – learned social standards of behaviour and feeling = ‘historical social psychology’
• ‘The way in which individual members of a group experience whatever affects their senses, the meaning it has for them, depends on the standard forms of dealing with, and thinking about, these phenomena gradually evolved in their society’
• He said that in connection with the growth of knowledge, but it also applies to changing habitus
![Page 15: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Why The Civilizing Process?
• The idea of changing human habitus often causes a negative reaction (especially from anthropologists, who are still collectively recovering from being the handmaidens of colonialism)
• Consequence has been an orthodoxy that Wittfogel called ‘developmental agnosticism’
![Page 16: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Why The Civilizing Process?
• But remember a remark by Kluckhohn and Murray in 1948:“Every person is in certain respects(a) like every other person(b) like some other people(c) like no other person”
• Every individual process of socialisation into prevailing social standards of behaviour, feeling and thinking is also a process of individualisation of those social standards
![Page 17: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Outline of The Civilizing Process
• Book originally in two volumes:I: changes in the behaviour of the secular upper
classes in the WestII: State formation and civilisation
• Each volume contains two parts, thus:1. On the sociogenesis of the concepts of ‘civilisation’
and ‘culture’ – ‘emic’ level2. Civilisation as a specific transformation of human
behaviour – ‘etic’ level3. Feudalisation and state formation4. Synopsis: towards a theory of civilising processes
![Page 18: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Part 1: The concepts of ‘civilisation’ and ‘culture’
• ‘Civilisation’ is a controversial word – shot through with ‘value-judgements’.
• We use it as a term of self-approbation – that is, we like to see ourselves as ‘civilised’.
![Page 19: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Part 1: The concepts of ‘civilisation’ and ‘culture’
What does it mean, to claim we are ‘civilised’?
• polite, good-mannered, considerate to others
• clean, decent, hygienic
• humane, gentle, kind
• restrained, even-tempered, not violent
![Page 20: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Part 1: The concepts of ‘civilisation’ and ‘culture’
• By the nineteenth century, European people had come to describe themselves as civilised, and to see themselves as ‘superior’ to other people whom they described as ‘primitive’ or ‘savage’ or ‘barbaric’.
• They also came to think of themselves as inherently, innately ‘civilised’.
![Page 21: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Part 1: The concepts of ‘civilisation’ and ‘culture’
• In fact, there was nothing inherent about their ways of behaving and feeling (and nothing inherently superior either).
• BUT some ways of behaving and feeling had become so deeply habituated, and so taken for granted, that they felt innate even to European people themselves.
![Page 22: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Part 1: The concepts of ‘civilisation’ and ‘culture’
• They became unconscious of the fact that they had learned these ways of behaving, and that their standards were the product of a long inter-generational learning process.
![Page 23: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Part 2: Manners Books
• Part 2 of Elias’s book deals with the way mannershad changed over the centuries, as they were depicted in ‘manners books’ from the 13th to the 19th century, in Germany, France, Italy and England.
• That also means changing feelings, emotions
![Page 24: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Part 2: Manners Books
• These books were addressed to the upper classes – to courtiers and would-be courtiers, then later to bourgeois groups. (Not to the hoi polloi!!)
![Page 25: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Part 2: Manners Books
So it comes as a shock to find what they discussed, and obviously had to discuss:
• table manners
• ‘natural functions’
• blowing one’s nose
• spitting
• behaviour in the bedroom
![Page 26: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Part 2: Manners Books
Trajectory is:
• Medieval books set out some basic rules (no zero-points), but briefly and not change much.
• From Renaissance, rules become more elaborate, more is said.
• Later, less needs to be said, and some things cannot be said.
![Page 27: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Part 2: Manners Books
EXAMPLES:
• Table manners
• Natural functions (= defecation and urination)
• Blowing one’s nose
• Spitting
• In the Bedroom (dressing and undressing)
![Page 28: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Including the generally puzzling question of nakedness …
![Page 29: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Among the Nuer (Evans-Pritchard, 1920s) …
![Page 30: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
And in medieval Europe …
![Page 31: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Or Botticelli’s Birth of Venus
![Page 32: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
… including the puzzling question of sexuality …
![Page 33: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
![Page 34: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Part 2: Manners Books
More generally, why study ‘outward bodily propriety’?
• Because ALL human societies have some rules or standards about how these biological needs are handled.
• Because all human infants are born in the same emotional condition – the lifetime point of departure is always the same.
• And, therefore, when the social standards for dealing with these matters change over time, the changes are easy to track
![Page 35: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Part 2: Manners Books
• The overall trend: a sequential order of development:
• People became aware of more things being forbidden. Caxton (late 15th century):
Thingis whilom used ben now leyd aside
Thingis sometyme alowed is now repruid
![Page 36: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Part 2: Manners Books
• ‘An invisible wall of affects [emotions] growing up between people’s bodies.’
• ‘They saw that they were naked, and were ashamed.’
• ‘Advance of the threshold of shame and embarrassment [or repugnance]’
![Page 37: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Part 2: Manners Books
• Activities moved behind the scenes of social life
• and, in a sense, behind the scenes of mental life too – repressed into the unconscious.
![Page 38: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Part 2: Manners Books
Explaining the trend: reasons for the changes:
• Not ‘material’ reasons.
• Not reasons of health and hygiene– ‘“Reason” is not the motor of the civilising of …
behaviour’ – contra Max Weber
• But significance of ‘reasons of respect’.
![Page 39: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Part 2: Manners Books
• Only quite late in the process do standards come to apply to everyone and in all circumstances.
• It isn’t a question simply of more self-control
• Note that earlier societies often had areas of extreme self-control – native Americans, ascetic monks, etc.
![Page 40: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Part 2: Manners Books
• Standards gradually come to be
more even
more automatic
more all-embracing
![Page 41: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Has the civilising process gone into reverse?
• BUT, if that was the long-term trend, how can we explain the apparent reversal in ‘Permissive Society’?
• This question has been dealt with in detail by Cas Wouters – key idea is ‘a highly controlled decontrolling of emotional controls’
![Page 42: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Part 3: Fear, Danger and Violence
• The civilising process, evident in the changing contents of manners books, can also be seen in changing social standards governingaggressiveness, violence and cruelty
• The advance of the threshold of repugnance towards violence
• Has violence changed too since the Middle Ages? – see Slide 3 from Mittelalterlicher Hausbuch
![Page 43: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
![Page 44: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Part 3: Fear, Danger and Violence
• ‘Is Man Aggressive?’ – not a static question – this too changes over time according to social circumstance
• Early Middle Ages – most of secular upper class were leaders of armed bands. They had little other social function but to fight. They loved it.
• Mutilation of prisoners, rape, pillage.
![Page 45: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Part 3: Fear, Danger and Violence
• Later, increased survival chances from self-restraint even on the battlefield – increasing military discipline.
• Public executions and torture. (See account of public dismemberment at beginning of Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish.)
• Pieter Spierenburg, The Spectacle of Suffering, 1984
• Later still, spectatorship, ‘mimetic’ pleasure.
![Page 46: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Part 3: Fear, Danger and Violence
• Long-term incidence of violence seems generally to be down (see slide)
• Further discussion: see Mennell, The American Civilizing Process, chapter 6
![Page 47: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
![Page 48: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
Part 3: Fear, Danger and Violence
• The link to state formation:
‘If, in this or that region, the power of central authority grows, if over a larger or smaller area people are forced to live at peace with one another, the moulding of the affects and the standards of the demands upon the management of emotions are gradually changed as well.’ (Elias)
![Page 49: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Part 3: State formation processes
• What is a state?
• Max Weber defined a state as:
‘an organisation which successfully upholds a claim to successful rule-making over a territory, by virtue of commanding a monopoly of the legitimate use of violence’
(Economy and Society, vol. I, p. 54)
![Page 50: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Part 3: State formation processes
• Spiral process: pacification promotes trade, economic growth, growth of towns, yielding taxes, supporting more effective administration, better armies, bigger wars, bigger pacified territories … and so on.
![Page 51: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Part 4: Bringing it all together
• How are ‘civilising’ changes in habitus linked to state formation (and other ‘macro’ processes)?
• Diminishing danger (within a pacified territory) diminishes fear, which makes possible greater emotional detachment and greater control over impulses
• Central idea of lengthening chains of interdependence
![Page 52: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Part 4: Bringing it all together
Component part-processes include
1. The social constraint towards self-constraint (conversion of Fremdzwang into Selbstzwang)
2. Spread of the pressure for foresight
3. Diminishing contrasts, increasing varieties
4. Taming and ‘courtisation’ of warriors
5. Muting of drives: psychologisation and rationalisation
6. Shame and repugnance
7. Increasing pressure from below
![Page 53: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
The Court Society, ‘historical social psychology’, and the arts
• Courtiers at Versailles under Louis XIV
• Demanding standards of self-constraint reflected in culture: drama of Corneille and Racine, art of Watteau, gardens of Le Nôtre
• Begins from ‘the structure of the dwelling’ – plan of a palais, from the Encyclopédie
![Page 54: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
![Page 55: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
The Court Society, ‘historical social psychology’, and the arts
• See also Elias, Mozart: the Sociology of a Genius(originally subtitled ‘Bourgeois Artist in Court Society’)
• And Bram Kempers, Painting, Power and Patronage (London: Allen Lane, 1992)
• Olle Edström, A Different Story: Aesthetics and the History of Western Music (Hillsdale, NY:Pendragon Press, 2008).
![Page 56: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Theoretical Objections
1. The ‘barbarisation’ argument (Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust) – see Elias, The Germans
2. The ‘permissive society’ argument – see Wouters, Informalization and Sex and Manners
3. The argument from cultural relativism4. The argument from ‘stateless civilisations’
![Page 57: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Knowledge and the Sciences
• How is the theory of civilising processes related to a theory of knowledge, and of sciences (in the plural)?
• Think all the way back to Elias’s dispute with Hönigswald
• Need a theory of knowledge that ‘steers between the Scylla of philosophical absolutism and the Charybdis of sociological relativism’
• Key problems:–‘Objectivity’–The growth of knowledge
![Page 58: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Involvement and Detachment
• Weber – Wertfreiheit
• Elias says ‘objectivity’ not matter of heroic individual psychology, but of the social development of standards of emotion management
• In other words – an aspect of a long-term civilising process
• Involvement–Detachment continuum
![Page 59: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
Involvement and Detachment
‘One cannot say of a man’s outlook in any absolute sense that it is detached or involved (or, if one prefers, “rational” or “irrational”, “objective” or “subjective”). Only small babies, and among adults perhaps only insane people, become involved in whatever they experience with complete abandon to their feelings here and now; and again only insane people can remain totally unmoved by what goes on around them.’
![Page 60: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
Involvement and Detachment
• Neither ‘psychological’ nor ‘social’ – not cause and effect
• Rather:
‘The way in which individual members of a group experience whatever affects their senses, the meaning it has for them, depends on a the standard forms of dealing with, and thinking about, these phenomena gradually evolved in their society’
![Page 61: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
Involvement and Detachment
• E.g. distinction between living and non-living things
• Highly ‘reality-congruent’ – it works consistently – but it didn’t always exist
![Page 62: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
Involvement and Detachment
• Some scope for individual variations in emotional reaction to thunder, fire, illness – but in scientific societies, the concepts that all individuals use embody high degree of detachment – ‘lightning’ ‘tree, ‘disease’, ‘electricity’, ‘cause’, ‘time’, ‘organism’.
• Not much scope for animism – but more in ‘society’ than in ‘nature’
![Page 63: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
Fantasy and Reality
• Lifetime civilising process: for children everywhere, the distinction between fantasy and reality is more blurred than for adults
• We learn the distinction between fantasy and reality, like other knowledge, in accordance with the public standard reached in our society
• And in scientific–industrial society, this public standard is very clear and rigid
![Page 64: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
Fantasy and Reality
• But the ‘magical–mythical’ mode of experience does not cease to exist – it endures in what Freud called the ‘unconscious’
• And it comes nearer to the surface in some areas – such as politics – than in others
![Page 65: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65
Science as a Detour via Detachment
• Situation of danger: Edgar Allen Poe’s story ‘A Descent into the Maelstrom’
• Principle of emotion management
• Science involves ‘detour via detachment’ –construction of a ‘theory’ by the brother who survived
![Page 66: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
Science as a Detour via Detachment
• Detour behaviour = ‘deferred gratification’
• Essential element in ‘rationality’ – guiding of action by means of symbolic representation of the connection between present means and future ends
• Early examples: tool making, hunting, control of fire
![Page 67: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
67
Growth of the Sciences
• Pursuit of ‘universal laws of nature’ e.g. Boyle’s Law – apparent utter emotional detachment
• But do these ‘eternal laws’ apply outside the physical sciences? − problem of ‘physics envy’ −atomistic fallacy
• Elias’s ‘model of models’
• ‘Levels of integration’ – Needham, Huxley, Waddington
![Page 68: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
68
Growth of the Sciences
• Complexity of integration increases up the hierarchy of the sciences:
• ‘Universal laws’ apply to congeries (loose integration), reversible like Boyle’s Law
• Chemistry − ‘structure theories’ (three dimensions − sugar C6H12O6, many varieties
![Page 69: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
69
Growth of the Sciences
• Or Crick & Watson’s ‘double helix’ of DNA
![Page 70: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
70
Growth of the Sciences
• Biology − process theories in 4 dimensions (space & time in evolution) − not universal, not reversible − much higher level of integration −growth, development
• By extension, society still more complex:
• Needs process theories in 5 dimensions −space, time, experience (or the symbolicdimension)
![Page 71: Workshop on Norbert Elias - Stephen Mennell - Home](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071600/613d24bd736caf36b759d459/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
71
The Social Sciences
‘Objects’ are also ‘subjects’. Difficulties:
• Double distanciation − but capacity for that itself grows over time as social process
• ‘Structured processes of change’ − yet no-one is planning − interweaving of interdependent people
From plans arising, yet unplannedBy purpose moved, yet purposeless