Workshop i vl student(presentation deck)

96
Developing a System-wide Approach to Support Students in Seeing Themselves As Their Own Teachers Michael McDowell, Ed.D. #vlconf201 4

description

This slide deck includes all the slides that were utilized in the actual presentation. The outcomes for the participants included: - Understand the process by which governance members, administrators, teacher leaders, teachers, and students identified, created, and implemented a system-wide approach to addressing the four fundamental questions: Where is the learner going? Where is the learner now? What are the learner’s next steps?, and, In light of the evidence, what approaches and strategies appeared to efficiently and effectively enhanced the learning process? - Understand the actions students have taken to see themselves as their own teachers in the classrooms. - Understand the actions teachers have taken to see learning through the eyes of students - Relate the six signposts of the VL research to system-wide leadership efforts of TUHSD in developing a learning system infrastructure, including professional development, to enhance students’ clarity of the learning process. - Explore actions (successes and challenges) that permeate across contexts to achieve the type of alignment and autonomy experienced by the leaders, teachers, and students of the presenting school district.

Transcript of Workshop i vl student(presentation deck)

Page 1: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Developing a System-wide Approach to Support Students in Seeing

Themselves As Their Own Teachers

Michael McDowell, Ed.D.

#vlconf2014

Page 2: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

Dialogue: https://todaysmeet.com/VLstudents

Pre-Assessment:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=khan+academy+and+the+effectiveness+of+science&sm=1

Twitter: @mmcdowell13 ; #VLConf2014

Email: [email protected]

Page 3: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

Know Need to Know

Page 4: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• “Take Away”

– Learners– Teachers– Leaders

Page 5: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 6: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

How do we develop an educational system that supports all students in seeing themselves as their own teachers?

#vlconf2014

Page 7: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 8: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

First Theory of action– If all students have clarity regarding

outcomes, success criteria, knowledge of current performance, and voice and choice in the learning process, then students will substantially improve in their learning and take greater responsibility over their learning.

Page 9: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Second Theory of action

• If teachers provide clarity of learning outcomes, success criteria, knowledge of current performance, and voice and choice in the learning process, then students will substantially improve in their learning and take greater responsibility over their learning.

Page 10: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Expectations

Page 12: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Our Story

Learning System Infrastructure

Daily operation

Page 13: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

Outcomes

• To understand a system-wide approach for enabling students to have:• Access to core learning outcomes, • Clarity of expectations, • Knowledge of performance levels, and• The opportunity to make decisions in the

learning process

Page 14: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

Outcomes

Understand the actions students have taken to see themselves as their own teachers in the classrooms.Understand the actions teachers have taken to see learning through the eyes of students

Page 15: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

PART I

Creating a Learning System Infrastructure

Page 16: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

• Developing a backbone

• Embracing Customization

• Developing a support system

Page 17: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• “Its unbelievable how much you don’t know about the game you’ve been playing all your life”

- Mantle

Page 18: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• Teachers are among the most powerful influences on learning

Page 19: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Teachers need to be directive, influential, caring, and actively engaged in the passion of teaching and learning

Page 20: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

“Teachers don’t teach.” – They

Page 21: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• Teachers need to be aware of what each and every student is thinking and knowing, to construct meaning and meaningful experiences in light of this knowledge, and have proficient knowledge and understanding of their content to provide meaningful and appropriate feedback such that each student moves progressively through the curriculum levels

Page 22: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

- Where is the learner going? - Where is the learner now? - What are the learner’s next steps?- In light of the evidence, what approaches

appear to efficiently and effectively enhance the learning process?

Page 23: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• Teachers need to move from the single idea to multiple ideas, and to relate and then extend these ideas such that learners construct and reconstruct knowledge and ideas. It is not the knowledge or ideas, but the learner’s construction of this knowledge and these ideas that is critical.

Page 24: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

School leaders and teachers need to create school, staffroom, and classroom environments where error is welcomed as a learning opportunity, where discarding incorrect knowledge and understandings is welcomed, and where participants can feel safe to learn, re-learn, and explore knowledge and understanding.

Page 25: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Factor influence on achievement (Hattie, 2009)Birth weight (.54)Lack of Illness (.23)Diet (.12)Drug interventions (.33)Exercise (.28)Socioeconomic status (.57)Family structure (.17)Home environment (.57)Parental involvement (.51)

teacher student relationships (.72)P.D. (.62)teacher clarity (.75)microteaching (.88)feedback (.73)Goals (.56)Mastery Learning (.58)Providing formative evaluation (.90)Spaced vs. Massed Practice (.71)

Page 26: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Effect sizes from teaching or working conditionsQuality of Teaching (.77)Reciprocal Teaching  (.74)Teacher-Student relationships  (.72)Providing Feedback (.72)Meta-cognition strategies (.67)Direct Instruction (.59)Mastery Learning  (.57)

Ave  (.68)

Within class grouping  (.28)Adding more finances  (.23)Reducing class size     (.21)Ability grouping            (.11)Multi-grade/age            (.04)Open v. trad                 (. 01)summer vacation        (-.09)Retention                    (-.16)

Ave (.08)

Page 27: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Effect sizes for teacher as activator and teacher as facilitator

Reciprocal Teaching  (.74)Feedback                    (.72)Direct Instruction   (.59)Problem Solving teaching (.61)Mastery Learning   (.57)Goals-Challenging   (.56)

Average activator      (.63)

Simulations and gaming (.32)Inquiry-based teaching   (.31)Individualized instruction (.20)PBL                                (.15)Web-based learning       (.09)Whole language-reading (.06)

Average facilitator    (.17)

Page 28: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Effect sizes for teacher as activator and teacher as facilitator

Reciprocal Teaching  (.74)Feedback                    (.72)Direct Instruction   (.59)Problem Solving teaching (.61)Mastery Learning   (.57)Goals-Challenging   (.56)

Average activator      (.63)

Simulations and gaming (.32)Inquiry-based teaching   (.31)Individualized instruction (.20)PBL                                (.15)Web-based learning       (.09)Whole language-reading (.06)

Average facilitator    (.17)

What are the key difference between these methods?The key is the role of the teacher…We go back to the story

Page 29: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Variables that don’t have a substantial impact- THE POLITICS OF DISTRACTION

• Attributes of students have a low effect on student learning (gender, parental employment, adoption, personality, labeling of students) (less than .18)

• Deep Programs matching styles of learning, inquiry based methods, individualized instruction, distance education (less than .22)

• School and Class Structure Summer school, finance, class size, ability grouping, retention, multi-grade/age classes, changing school calendars (less that .10)

Page 30: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Research Guidance

Strategy EffectTeachers working together to evaluate their impact and

responding to that impact 0.93Teachers conduct pre-assessments, utilizing data to inform

instruction, and providing students with a clear understanding of expectations for meeting learning outcomes (Where are we

going?, where are we now?, and what’s next?

0.77

Teachers using practices in the classroom that values errors and trust 0.72

Teachers receive feedback on their impact on student learning 0.72

Teachers are providing an appropriate proportion of surface and deep level knowledge 0.71

Providing students with challenge and practice at the right level 0.60

Page 31: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Research Guidance

Strategy EffectTeachers working together to evaluate their impact and

responding to that impact 0.93Teachers conduct pre-assessments, utilizing data to inform

instruction, and providing students with a clear understanding of expectations for meeting learning outcomes (Where are we

going?, where are we now?, and what’s next?

0.77

Teachers using practices in the classroom that values errors and trust 0.72

Teachers receive feedback on their impact on student learning 0.72

Teachers are providing an appropriate proportion of surface and deep level knowledge 0.71

Providing students with challenge and practice at the right level 0.60

Page 32: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Progress

Proficiency

Page 33: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

A culture & climate conducive to improving teaching and learning

Page 34: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

What do we want all students to know and be able to do?

How do we know when students are learning?

What do we do based on such results?

How do we work together to review and respond to student learning?

Page 35: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

What do we want all students to know and be able to do?

What do we do based on these results?

How do we work together to review and respond to student learning?

Common Outcomes

Common Scales

Common Intervention Criteria

Common Culture and Work

How do we know when students are learning?

Page 36: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Common OutcomesCustomized Instruction

Customized Assessment

Customized Collaborative Structures

Customized Intervention

Common Scales

Common Intervention Criteria

Common Culture and Work

Page 37: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

What do we want all students to know and be able to do?

What do we do based on these results?

How do we work together to review and respond to student learning?

Common Outcomes

Common Scales

Common Intervention Criteria

Common Culture and Work

How do we know when students are learning?

Page 38: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 39: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 40: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Teaching [and learning] in the dark is a questionable practice” (Taba, 1966)

Page 41: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

- Where is the learner now?

Page 42: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Score Description

4 ExtensionApplying Understanding

3 RelationalMaking Meaning

2 Single/MultipleBuilding Knowledge

1 Direct Support

Proficiency

Not Yet Proficiency

Page 43: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Score Description

4 ExtensionApplying Understanding

3 RelationalMaking Meaning

2 Single/MultipleBuilding Knowledge

1 Direct Support

DEEP

SURFACE

Page 44: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 45: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 46: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

A tale of two tools

Rubric 1.0 Rubric 2.0 (scale)Multi-dimensional Uni-dimensional

Context-rich Context-poor

Task oriented Learning orientedSubstantial criteria per

level minimal criteria per level

Progression levels dictated by rubric

purpose

Progression levels dictated by learning

taxonomy

Limits autonomy Enhances autonomy

Compliance orientation Performance orientation* This is typical , not always the case

Page 47: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 48: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Connections

Limited Growth (0.0-0.39)

Expected Growth (.40 +)

Not Yet Proficient (0.0-2.25)

Proficient (2.5-4.0)

Page 49: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Limited Growth (0.0-0.39) Expected Growth (.40 +)

Not Yet Proficient (0.0-2.25)

Make A Change!

• Review & Make Changes to Instructional Strategies

Keep it up!

• More Time • Same Instructional

Program• Celebrate Success

Proficient (2.5-4.0) Cruising

• Review & Make Changes to Instructional Strategies

Success

• Capture Instructional Strategies

• Celebrate Success• Continue Practices

Page 50: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Limited Growth (0.0-0.39) Expected Growth (.40 +)

Not Yet Proficient (0.0-2.5)

Make A Change!

• Review & Make Changes to Instructional Strategies

Keep it up!

• More Time • Same Instructional

Program• Celebrate Success

Proficient (2.5-4.0) Cruising

• Review & Make Changes to Instructional Strategies

Success

• Capture Instructional Strategies

• Celebrate Success• Continue Practices

Capture Success/Replicate

Change

Page 51: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Limited Gain (0.0-0.5) Expected Growth (.5 +)

Not Yet Proficient (0.0-2.25)

Make A Change!

• Review & Make Changes to Instructional Strategies

Keep it up!

• More Time • Same Instructional

Program• Celebrate Success

Proficient (2.5-4.0) Cruising

• Review & Make Changes to Instructional Strategies

Success

• Capture Instructional Strategies

• Celebrate Success• Continue Practices

Page 52: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

What? So What? Now What?

Moving from Data Analysis to Response

Page 53: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Single/Multiple Ideas- What instructional approaches will support students in understanding foundational knowledge (e.g. facts, vocabulary terms) related to learning outcomes? Relating ideas- What instructional approaches support students in connecting and contrasting ideas? What are generalizations and principles that can be made about these ideas? Extending ideas- What instructional approaches support students in applying the learning outcomes to other contexts

Next Steps- Teachers

Page 54: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Aligning “High Probability Strategies” from the Art and Science of Teaching to Progression Levels.

Outcome Questions Activities

Applying understanding What do I typically do to engage students in cognitively complex tasks involving hypothesis generation and testing?

Experimental-inquiry tasksProblem-solving tasks

Making meaning What do I typically do to organize students and deepen knowledge?

Venn diagramsComparison matrix

Building knowledge What do I typically do to identify critical information?

Identifying critical input experiences

Page 55: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Math Strategies

Below Average

• Counting all 22%• Counting on 72%• Known facts 6%• Derived facts/Number

Sense 0%

Above Average

• Counting all 0%• Counting on 9%• Known facts 30%• Derived facts/Number

Sense 61%

Page 56: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 57: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 58: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 59: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 60: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Common OutcomesCustomized Instruction

Customized Assessment

Customized Collaborative Structures

Customized Intervention

Common Scales

Common Intervention Criteria

Common Culture and Work

Page 61: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• Driver of customization is impact• Impact is identified through progress and

proficiency• Impact is discussed by all stakeholders• All stakeholders have degrees of voice

and choice in showing, celebrating, and improving upon their impact.

Page 62: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

Support Systems– Governance Purpose, Procedures,

Agreements– Aligning policy– Allocating resources– Developing a distributed leadership team– Codifying and Focusing Human Capacity

Efforts

Page 63: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Single/Multiple Ideas- What strategies am I using that will support me in building knowledge and skills (e.g. facts, vocabulary terms) related to learning outcomes? Relating ideas- What approaches appear to be working or I should attempt to connect and contrast ideas? How am I going as related to making generalizations and principles? Extending ideas- What approaches support me in applying the learning outcomes to other contexts?

Next Steps- Students

Page 64: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 65: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Part II

How do we operationalize a learning system to substantially impact all learners?

Page 66: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

- Where is the learner going? - Where is the learner now? - What are the learner’s next steps?- In light of the evidence, what approaches

appear to efficiently and effectively enhance the learning process?

Page 67: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Where are we?

What’s next?

Where are we going?

Page 68: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Where are we?

What’s next?

Where are we going?

How are we ensuring voice and choice?

What’s working? What needs improvement?

Page 70: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 71: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Be honest with where I am at on learning progressions. I definitely am honest with where I am in this class. This way of assessment has completely made me feel alright with being in the pit because I know that I am not stuck there and that I can get myself out of it. I really appreciate all that you have done to make us feel comfortable with progress. 

Page 72: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

 Be open to struggling…Before this class I was not open to struggling at all, so this took me a while to get used to. Now I know that I can get myself out of the pit, so I feel comfortable being in it! I just wish it was this way in the rest of my classes. ):

Page 73: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

My annotations and thoughts on written pieces were at about a 1 level at the beginning of the semester, but with guidance in class and a lot of practice I have grown to getting a four on the last annotation. Next semester I hope to grow further.

Page 74: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

BUMPS IN THE ROAD

Page 75: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• Students are rarely involved in the assessment process

• Curriculum design rarely introduces questions, criteria, and tasks for students to solve that require a range of surface and deep level knowledge

• Student thinking is dramatically influenced by context (rubrics and project expectations)

• Voice and Choice in tasks and assessments are rarely accessible or limited in scope to students due, in large part, to clarity and language.

Page 76: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

1. Create discipline centered questions for surface and deep level understanding

2. Identify a myriad of contexts that can be used to extend student learning across disciplines

3. Determine degree of autonomy related to context and tasks.

Page 77: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Goal- Student understands the relationship between historical events and artistic expression

Extended- Understand how art represents human behavior that stands the test of time.

Relational- Understands the relationship between the creation or expression of art and the events of the time.

Single/Multiple- Understand how compositional principles are identified in famous pieces of art

TUHSD

Page 78: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

TUHSD

Goal- Student understands the relationship between historical events and artistic expression

Academic Question

Extended- Understand how art represents human behavior that stands the test of time.

Relational- Understands the relationship between the creation or expression of art and the events of the time.

Single/Multiple- Understand how compositional principles are identified in famous pieces of art

How does this painting relate to contemporary time?

How does this piece connect to the time of its creation? Or, What do you consider the author was saying through his painting?

Who created the following piece? What is the name of the piece? What are two compositional principles that the artist used in the piece?

Page 79: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

• The student will initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one on one, in groups, and teacher led) with diverse partners on grade-appropriate topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively (SL. 11-12.1)

• The student will draw skillfully across various sources of influence to motivate and enable vital behaviors so that important personal, social, and organization goals are accomplished.

Page 80: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 81: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Unobtrusive Obtrusive Student Generated

Applying Understanding

Making Meaning

Building Knowledge

Page 82: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

- What are the teacher’s next steps?- In light of the evidence, what approaches

appear to efficiently and effectively enhance the learning process?

Page 83: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

- What are the student’s next steps?- In light of the evidence, what approaches

appear to efficiently and effectively enhance the learning process?

Page 84: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 85: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Defining Features

Page 86: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Systemic Professional Learning Community Framework

Page 87: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)
Page 88: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Assessment for Learning

LearningCenteredCultureand Climate

IMPACT

Backwards Design

Differentiation

System-Wide PLC Framework

Page 89: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Curriculum Design

Page 90: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Assessment for Learning

Page 91: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Differentiation

Page 92: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Learning Centered Culture and Climate

Page 93: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Research Guidance

Strategy EffectTeachers working together to evaluate their impact and

responding to that impact 0.93Teachers conduct pre-assessments, utilizing data to inform

instruction, and providing students with a clear understanding of expectations for meeting learning outcomes (Where are we

going?, where are we now?, and what’s next?

0.77

Teachers using practices in the classroom that values errors and trust 0.72

Teachers receive feedback on their impact on student learning 0.72

Teachers are providing an appropriate proportion of surface and deep level knowledge 0.71

Providing students with challenge and practice at the right level 0.60

Page 94: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

What do you need to know?

Page 95: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

#vlconf2014

Dialogue: https://todaysmeet.com/VLstudents

Twitter: @mmcdowell13 ; #VLConf2014

Email: [email protected]

Page 96: Workshop i  vl student(presentation deck)

Learn more about Visible Learningplus at www.corwin.com/visiblelearning