WORK PLAN MEMORANDUM

toO 0 00 0 2 6

WORK PLAN MEMORANDUM

R E M 11

PERFORMANCE OF REMEDIAL RESPONSEACTIVITIES AT UNCONTROLLED

HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES

US. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-01-6939

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.PRIME CONTRACTOR

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

209096

WORK PLAN MEMORANDUMTAR LAKE

Mancelona Township, Antrim County, Michigan

Work Assignment No. 101-5L71

7 May 1985

Document No. 201-WP1-WM-BBAS-2

*** Company Confidential ***

This Work Plan Memorandum, prepared by REM II Team in accordance with theitems of U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract No. WA 68-01-6969, iscompany confidential.

REGION V

SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER

DOCUMENT VERIFICATION

TITLE: . c ; -4 ^7«^ /^ -•- -.0 .-, .,<:/,...-•

DATE: 5" /7/?S

AS EPA REGIONAL PROJECT MANAGER FOR fj-^k?- SITE,

I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE TITLE DOCUMENT AND INDICATE DISPOSITION

AS MARKED:

DISPOSITION:

\/ INCLUDE IN SITE FILE.

PUT IN C.B.I.

OTHER

RPM/?/ v

^SIGNATURE)

DATE <*

COM CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

environmental eng.neers. scientists. 11 East Ma™ Street Sulte 150°planners 4 management consultants Chicago, Illinois 60603

312 786-0253

May 7th, 1985

Mr. Richard E. BarteltRegional Project OfficerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency230 South Dearborn StreetChicago, Illinois 60604

Ms. Francine PollackRemedial Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency230 South Dearborn StreetChicago, Illinois 60604

Project: REM II - EPA Contract No. 68-01-6939

Document No.: 201-WPl-EP-BBAU-l

Subject: Work Plan Memorandum for Tar LakeMancelona Township, Antrim County, Michigan

Dear Mr. Bartelt and Ms. Pollack:

The REM II Team is pleased to submit this Work Plan Memorandum for theTar Lake site located in Mancelona Township, Antrim County, Michigan.

Please note that the costs presented in this memorandum are based on costdata for Woodward-Clyde Consultants and represent direct and indirectcosts, without base fee or award fee. The detailed costs and fees willbe presented in the Work Plan and will be supported by Optional Form 60for each REM II Team firm's participation in the work assignment.

It has been determined that no conflict of interest exists for theRegional and Site Managers for this work assignment. Also, it has beendetermined that no organizational conflict of interest exists for CampDresser & McKee, Inc. Signed conflict of interest statements will besubmitted under separate cover.

AP1-9/1

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

Mr. Richard E. BarteltMs. Francine PollackMay 7th, 1985Page Two

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Very truly yours,

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

W. Hawthorne, P.E.Vice, PresidentRegiton V Manager

leal Operations Manager inancean G. Gtfrtisr P.E.and Administration Manager

cc: Ulrike Joiner, Contracting Officer, USEPAWilliam Kaschak, Project Officer, USEPANancy Willis, Region V Coordinator, USEPA

JWH/dk

Receipt by EPA Region V Acknowledged: Exceptions Taken

Regional Project Officer

Remedial Project Officer

Explanation of exceptions attached:

Routing of Acknowledgement:

Date Yes No

Date Yes No

Yes No

Return original to REM II Site Manager - Kenneth H. Kastman

Copies to:

REM II Project Officer - W. M. KaschakREM II NPMO - J. G. CurtisAP1-9/2

11 Eas! Adams StreetSuite 1500Chicago. Illinois 60603312-939-1000Telex 253875 (WOODWARD CGO)

MEMORANDUM:

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

TO: John W. HawthorneRegion V Manager

FROM: Kenneth H. Kastman

DATE: 7 May 1985

PROJECT: EPA Contract No. 68-01-6939

DOCUMENT NO.: 201-WP1-BBAT-2

SUBJECT: Work Plan Memorandum ForTar Lake, Mancelona Township, Antrim County, Michigan

ACTION: Immediate Response

The Work Plan Memorandum for the Tar Lake Project is enclosed forsubsequent submittal to U.S. EPA, Region V.

KHK/cf

Enclosure

Consulting Eng neers Geologistsand Environmental Scientists

Offices in Other Principal Cities

Tar LakeWork Plan Memorandum

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1_1

2.0 SCOPE OF INITIAL SERVICES 2-1

Task 0 Prepare Work Plan Memorandum 2-1Task 1 Define Current Situation 2-1

Subtask 1.1 Obtain and Evaluate ExistingInformation 2-1

Subtask 1.2 Prepare Site Map 2-2Subtask 1.3 Develop Site Personnel and Safety

Evaluation Form 2-3Subtask 1.4 Perform Initial Site Visit and

Verify Existing Conditions 2-3Subtask 1.5 Review of Work Plan Submitted by

Potentially Responsible Parties 2-4Task 2 Prepare Project Plans 2-5

Subtask 2.1 Project Operations Plans 2-6Subtask 2.2 Quality Assurance Project Plan 2-8Subtask 2.3 Community Relations Plan 2-9

Task 3 Prepare Work Plan 2-9Subtask 3.1 Prepare Draft Work Plan 2-9Subtask 3.2 Agency Review 2-11Subtask 3.3 Prepare Final Work Plan 2-11

Task 4 Coordination and Management 2-11

3.0 BUDGET 3-1

4.0 SCHEDULE 4-1

5.0 KEY STAFF 5-1


LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

Table 2-1 Types of Quality Control Reviews 2-12Table 2-2 Quality Assurance Plan - Table of Contents 2-13

11


LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment

Attachment A Summary of Project CostsAttachment B Detail of Labor and Expense CostsAttachment C Schedule of ActivitiesAttachment D Schedule of DeliverablesAttachment E Site Manager's ResumeAttachment F Site Manager's Conflict of Interest Statement

111


1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Work Plan Memorandum describes the initial tasks to be performed at the

Tar Lake site in accordance with USEPA Work Assignment No. 101-5L71.

Tar Lake is located in Mancelona Township, Antrim County, Michigan. It is

bounded on the north and south by private property, on the east by Mancelona

Township property, and on the west by State Highway 131 and the ConrailRailroad tracks. The City of Mancelona well field is located north of the

site, and there are numerous private water supply wells located around thesite. Much of the surrounding area has been developed for residential use,

light Industry, and fanning.

The Tar Lake site is currently owned by the Gulf & Western Manufacturing

Company. The site was Initially owned and used for Industrial disposal by the

Antrim Iron Works from 1886 until 1945. The facility was comprised of a sawmill, chemical plant, iron extraction plan, and a steel production plant. Tar

Lake, which is actually a large depression in the land, received wastes fromvarious manufacturing processes on site. In addition to Tar Lake, the site

currently contains many large slag pits, limestone piles, and ruins of oldmanufacturing operations.

The primary public health concerns from the site are the potential

contamination of off-site drinking water wells in the nearby village ofAntrim. The City of Mancelona (one mile north of the site) has provided thevillage of Antrim with a municipal water supply since the early 1900's;

however, many rural residents maintain active wells as a potable domesticwater source. Past groundwater sampling near the site by the Michigan

Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and the Michigan Department of PublicHealth (MDPH) has shown the presence of ortho-creosol, phenols, and metals.

In addition, there 1s a potential public health and environmental threat from

direct contact with contaminated soils or sediments surrounding the site.

Past soils sampling has shown the presence of several heavy metals andphenols. Furthermore, the possibility exists for air contamination from gases

1f the materials 1n Tar Lake catch fire, as occurred 1n the 1960's.

1-1


2.0 SCOPE OF INITIAL SERVICES

TASK 0 - PREPARE WORK PLAN MEMORANDUM

Objective: Prepare a Work Plan Memorandum describing the initial tasksto be performed in order to prepare the Work Plan and

project plans, and identify the level of effort, associatedcosts and schedule.

Data Sources: As listed in Task 1

Deliverables: Work Plan Memorandum

TASK 1 - DEFINE CURRENT SITUATION

SUBTASK 1.1 - OBTAIN AND EVALUATE EXISTING INFORMATION

Objective: Develop a file of existing available information for use inpreparing the Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation (RI)

and Feasibility Study (FS).

Data Sources: Sources of information to be investigated are:

o Michigan Department of Natural Resources Records,

o Michigan Department of Public Health Records,

o United States Geological Survey (USGS) Maps,

o USEPA Records, Including the RAMP Prepared for the site,

o USEPA Potential Responsible Parties Search Report (whenavailable).

o U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Naps and

o USEPA Topographic Maps of the site.

2-1


Assumptions:

Deliverables:

Information sources will provide access to and furnish

required data for evaluation.

An Initial Site Evaluation Report (ISER) summarizing and

evaluating the current data base will be prepared. A

chronologic history of operations and response actions

conducted at the site and a listing of materials known to

have been deposited or stored at the site will be

summarized. A description of known or potential problems

associated with the existing data will be presented and

data gaps will be Identified.

The ISER will include the compiled site map (Subtask 1.2)

and information gathered during the site visit

(Subtask 1.4). The ISER will Include pertinent summaries

and the results of evaluations of existing data to aid in

development of the RI/FS Work Plan and Project Plans.

Preliminary goals and alternative remedial actions will be

identified and reviewed with appropriate agency personnel

prior to finalizatlon of the ISER.

SUSBTASK 1.2 - PREPARE SITE MAP

Objectives:

Data Sources:

Prepare a site map presenting existing Information to beused during the site visit. The site map will be developedfrom existing USEPA topographic maps of the site. The mapwill be used confirm the site boundary conditions and fordevelopment of additional survey requirements (if any)which would be defined as a technical task in the WorkPlan.

o USGS Information,

o Existing USEPA maps of the site, and

2-2


Assumptions:

o Available historic and current aerial photographs.

o The compiled site map will be used for conceptualizingthe Work Plan requirements and will be solely based onexisting maps and information.

o Graphics standards will be incorporated into the WorkPlan development and RI/FS deliverables.

Deliverables: A compiled site map which will be included in the ISER,Subtask 1.1.

SUBTASK 1.3 - DEVELOP SITE PERSONNEL PROTECTION AND SAFETY EVALUATION FORM

Objective: Prepare a site-specific Site Personnel Protection andSafety Evaluation Form (SPPSEF) to allow the Site Manageraccess to the site for data gathering necessary for theInitial site characterization.

Data Sources: Data and map from Subtasks 1.1 and 1.2.

Assumptions: The SPPSEF will be based on the site map prepared inSubtask 1.2 and listing of known materials deposited orstored as developed In Subtask 1.1.

Deliverables: SPPSEF

SUBTASK 1.4 - PERFORM INITIAL SITE VISIT AND VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS

Objective: Confirm the existing site conditions as shown on the

compiled site map; to provide the on-site Informationnecessary to prepare the Health and Safety Plan; toIdentify any sensitive receptors within the study area;to familiarize the Site Manager with the existing siteconditions, topography, access routes and proximity topopulation centers.

and

2-3


Data Sources: o USGS mapping,

o Available local survey information, and

o Compiled site map from Subtask 1.2.

Assumptions: The compiled site map will be used to confirm existing

information and to be a base to develop detailed mapping to

be accomplished in the Remedial Investigation.

Deliverables: Information gathered during the site visit will be included

in the Initial Site Evaluation Report (ISER).

SUBTASK 1.5 - REVIEW OF WORK PLAN SUBMITTED BY POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES

Objective: Review the Work Plan, if one 1s submitted by Potentially

Responsible Parties (PRP); determine whether the Work Plan

is technically adequate for the site and whether the Work

Plan conforms to USEPA requirements.

Date Sources: Work Plan submitted by PRP.

Assumptions: The PRP Work Plan will contain enough detail to allow a

technical assessment to be performed.

Tasks 2 and 3 will not proceed concurrently with this

Subtask 1.5 unless authorized by the USEPA Remedial Project

Manager.

Deliverables: Technical Memorandum summarizing the review of the PRP Work

Plan.

2-4


TASK 2 - PREPARE PROJECT PLANS

Objectives: Prepare those project plans necessary for the execution ofthe work specified in the Work Plan and to verify that thework is conducted in a consistent manner that satisfies thereviewing and using agencies' requirements prior toexecution.

Two major project plans will be developed:

o A Project Operations Plan (POP), which will defineprocedures for execution of the Work Plan, and

o A Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) which willdefine procedures for verifying that the Work Planactivities have been conducted in accordance with theWork Plan and appropriate specified procedures.

Each major project plan will be comprised of several com-ponents. The POP will include the site-specific Health andSafety Plan (HSP) and the Site Management Plan (SMP) whichincludes data management procedures. The QAPP will includethe Quality Control Plan (QCP), the Quality Assurance Plan

(QAP), and the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP).

Data Sources: o Information collected from site files compiled in Task 1and the Initial site visit,

o REM II Guidance Documents,

o USEPA Region V directives and procedures,

o State and local directives and procedures,

o REM II Health and Safety Assurance Manual, and

o REM II Quality Assurance Program Plan.

2-5


Assumptions: o REM II approved program plans and approved project plans

from other projects will form the basis of the project

plans required for the Master Disposal Service Landfill

site.

o The Site Health and Safety Plan, Site Management Plan,

and Sampling and Analysis Plan will be developed in

their entirety.

o Laboratory Quality Control will be performed by the

USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) and the USEPA

Central Region Laboratory (CRL).

o Project plans will be developed in parallel with the

Work Plan (Task 3) and will be finalized following

receipt of USEPA Comments on the Work Plan.

SUBTASK 2.1 - PROJECT OPERATIONS PLANS

Subtask 2.1.1 - Health and Safety Plan

A site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HSP) will be prepared for approval,

using input from Task 1. The plan will include:

o Personnel protective equipment requirements keyed to generalized sitelocation and activity,

o Safety equipment Inventory,

o Training requirements,

o Medical surveillance program,

o Specific medical procedures, as appropriate,

o Personnel hygiene requirements,

o Contingency plan and emergency procedures,

2-6


o Site personnel/activity safety monitoring program, and

o Decontamination procedures.

The HSP will be organized to apply to all RI field work and will be consistentwith:

o Section III(c)(6) of CERCLA,

o USEPA Order 1440.2 -- Health and Safety Requirements for EmployeesEngaged in Field Activities,

o USEPA Order 1440.3 — Respiratory Protection,

o USEPA Occupational Health and Safety Manual,

o USEPA Standard Operating Safety Guides (November 1984), and

o Site Conditions.

Subtask 2.1.2 - Site Management Plan

A plan will be developed detailing project operations at the site, includingsite access and security, contingency plans for other than site personnel, andthe general coordination and operational planning of activities to beperformed at the site.

Data management procedures will be Included in the Site Management Plan toguide the efficient management of the large quantity of data which will resultfrom this assignment. Data management procedures will Include:

o Data recording/gathering format,

o Data file type and location,

o Data file control assignment (by Individual) and sign-out procedure,

o Procedures/timing for return of Information to file (eg, no data leftat work station overnight), and

o Back-up file procedures, requirements, locations and updating periods.

2-7


SUBTASK 2.2 - QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN

A site-specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) will be developed in

accordance with USEPA Region V Quality Assurance Project Plan Guidance.

Preparation of this document will be tailored to the specific requirements for

the project in the field and 1n the office. Since analysis will be performed

by a USEPA Contract Laboratory, the analytical QA/QC will be performed by the

Contract Laboratory and monitored by the Region V Central Regional Laboratory.

Three documents related to Quality Assurance apply to the Tar Lake site: 1) a

Quality Control Plan (QCP) that governs office work and deliverables, 2) a

site-specific Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) that covers field and laboratory

work, and 3) a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) that details the sampling to

be performed at the site and the subsequent analyses of the samples.

Subtask 2.2.1 - Quality Control Plan

Quality Control (QC) 1s a function provided on a task by task basis as an

integral part of each activity (eg, engineering calculations review and check-

off system). Quality Control of deliverables is a function provided on an

overview basis by the REM II team. REM II review is provided singly or by

committee as appropriate to the deliverable. The types of reviews to beincluded in the QCP are shown in Table 2-1.

Subtask 2.2.2 - Quality Assurance Plan

Quality Assurance activities for field and laboratory functions are described

in the Quality Assurance Plan. The topics to be Included in the QAP are shown

1n Table 2-2.

Subtask 2.2.3 - Sampling and Analysis Plan

A site-specific Sampling and Analysis Plan, based on the findings of theInitial site visit and the USEPA Work Assignment, will be developed. The planwill Include sampling and analytical requirements for the Remedial

2-8


Investigation. This plan will be developed in accordance with current REM II

Site Investigations Procedure Manual. The RI/FS program will Include samplingof air, soil, sediment, surface water, ground water and leachates (if any).

Nearby residential and municipal wells will also be sampled.

SUBTASK 2.3 - COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

A Community Relations Plan for the Tar Lake site is being prepared under a

separate Work Assignment. The REM II Team will not prepare a Community

Relations Plan under this Work Assignment (N0.101-5L71).

Tasks associated with the Community Relations Plan that the REM II Team will

perform include:

o Participation in public meetings, and

o Development of information for press releases, fact sheets, and projectsummaries to be prepared by USEPA.

A meeting will be scheduled with USEPA Region V to discuss details of the

Community Relations Plan prior to completing the Final Work Plan.

TASK 3 - PREPARE WORK PLAN

SUBTASK 3.1 - PREPARE DRAFT WORK PLAN

Objectives: Prepare a Draft Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation/

Feasibility Study (RI/FS).

Data Sources: Outputs and Information from Task 1.

Deliverables: Draft Work Plan Including estimated budgets and schedules

for the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study for

the long-term remedial action addressing contamination on-

slte and off-site for soils, ground water, surface water,

sediments, and local residential and municipal wells.

2-9


The Work Plan will include specific, discrete tasks to be

performed under each phase of work. The plan will include

the items listed below:

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS)

o Introduction,

o Background of Site,

o Work Scope,

o Technical Approach,

o Site Investigations,

- Air quality- Stormwater runoff- Surface water and sediments- Domestic and municipal water supply wells- Hydrogeology- Soils- Ground water

o Environmental Risk Assessment,

o Response Objectives and Criteria,

o Identification of Appropriate Technologies,

o Development of Alternatives,

o TreatabiHty/Laboratory Studies, as appropriate,

o Evaluation of Alternatives,

o Recommended Alternatives,

o Conceptual Design/Final Report,

o Schedule,

2-10


o Budget,

o Deliverables, and

o Optional Form 60.

SUBTASK 3.2 - AGENCY REVIEW

Objectives: Obtain USEPA and MDNR input and concurrence with the Draft

Work Plan.

Data Sources: Not applicable.

Assumptions: USEPA and MDNR will provide consolidated review comments in

a timely manner (eg, within 30 days).

Deliverables: None.

SUBTASK 3.3 - PREPARE FINAL WORK PLAN

Objectives: Produce documents to direct the Tar Lake Remedial

Investigation/Feasibility Study incorporating appropriate

agency comments.

Data Sources: The results of Subtasks 3.1 and 3.2.

Deliverables: Final Work Plan.

TASK 4 - COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT

Objectives: o Provide technical supervision for the project,

o Prepare and submit monthly technical and financial pro-gress reports,

2-11


o Attend progress meetings,

o Conduct work effort QC and QA audits, and

o Implement document control procedures and project sche-dule controls.

Data Sources: o Work Plan Memorandum,

o Output from Tasks 1, 2 and 3, and

o Management information system established for the REM IIcontract (REMIS).

Assumptions: Monthly progress reports will be prepared during the

performance of the Initial tasks 1n conformance with the

standard monthly report format.

Deliverables: Monthly Technical and Financial Status Reports.

2-12


TABLE 2-1

Types Of Quality Control Reviews

QCP Activities Legend

A. Single Person Review and Signoff*

1. Supervisora. Regional Managerb. Health & Safety Managerc. Technical Operations Managerd. Finance & Administration Director

2. Peer Review and Signoff

3. Technical Expert Review and Signoff(Identify individual, provide resume and schedule time)

B. Committee Review and Signoff

1. Assembled committee

2. Blind committee(appropriate technical disciplines must be identified, resumesprovided, chairman identified and time schedule)

*S1gnoff consists of approval signature block on the transmittal page of thedeliverable signed and dated by the responsible party(ies) or committeechairman prior to electronic submittal to the NPMO for approval for release tothe USEPA region.

2-13


TABLE 2-2

Quality Assurance PlanTable Of Contents

Section Title

1 Introduction and Project Description

2 Project Organization and Responsibility

3 QA Objectives for Data in Terms of Measurements of Precision,Accuracy, Completeness, Representativeness and Comparability andIntended Use

4 Sampling Objectives and Procedures

5 Sample Custody

6 Calibration Procedures, References and Frequency

7 Preventive Maintenance Procedures and Schedules

8 Analytical Procedures

9 Analytical Quality Control Checks and Frequency

10 Specific Routine Procedures to be Used to Assess Data Precision,Accuracy and Completeness of Specific Measurement ParametersInvolved

11 Data Reduction, Validation and Reporting

12 Performance and System Audits and Frequency

13 Corrective Action

14 Quality Assurance Reports to Management

15 Internal Quality Control Checks and Frequency

2-14


3.0 BUDGET

The costs associated with the initial tasks are presented in Attachments A and

B. Attachment A presents a summary of labor and expense costs associated with

the initial tasks. Attachment B presents a detailed breakout of labor by

category and expenses and other direct costs (ODCs) by task. These costs are

in accordance with our understanding of the requirements of this project.

3-1

ATTACHMENT APage 1 of 2

REM II

PHASE

ft Code ini-5L7i

ft MMM9er NMW if M

SSAN 395-42-7192

Site NiMber 201

Site NMW Tar Lake

Phase WP-1

Start Date April 11. 1985 (4)

End Date Sept. 30. 1986 (5)

TASK

Ot.Q Work Plan_Memp_Txi sting

1.1 Information

1.2 Site Mapj

lUl. SPPSEFJ Site VisitUlJiailSEB-! Review PRP

• Coord. 5 Mgmt.p.O Tasks 0 and 1

TOTAL (Pg. 1)

ProfessionalHours t $

Jfi...

80

22

12

Jifl.

24

324

4140

858

685

_-50,8_9__

1748.. ~

— — —

18195

SupportHours i t

16

6

4

4_._..

10

8

64

146

80

101 „

__225

180

— — —

1474— ._

Equipment$

— —52

52

Travel$

.510.

""

—«....**

510

OOC's$

70

75

170

125.

150

765

Sub-Pool$

—

Indirect20.8%

15

16

35

— Q

153

-2fL _

31

276

Total$

z*m4,377

1,143

286

3314

2.J09

21,272

IJS.PROO (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (ID (12) (13) (H) (2)

ATTACHMENT APage 2 of 2

REM II

PHASE

tft Code 101-5171

»ft Manager Name K. H. Kastman

SSAN 395-42-7192

Site Number 201

Site Name Tar Lake

Phase UP-1

Start Date April 11. 1985 (4)

End Date Sept. 30. 1986 (5)

| TASK«*> tmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm• Health and

2.1.1 Safety Plan• Ti fe "Wanaqeminl2:i:2 Plan

1 -—• -- ..__ -T-

'2.2.1 QCP1 —».--—-—- —

jl*2j£JLAJL.

1

1 3*1 J?rAfJL-W_ojrk ,PTlan T_11 2*2^agpcy__Rev.t(5li_J3x3 Final Work Plan1 Coo"rd. &"Mg~mf.

j Total JJhls Page}

1 TOTAL (Pg.l&2)

IJS.PROO >ft">

ProfessHours

56

40

32

55

D _-

119

20

60

SQ

476

800

(6)

lonal$

2940

2272

1964

.3.617

386L

—.6896

1456• _

3826

29745

47,939

(7)

Sup*Hours

10

10

6

___jj _

__JJL_

32

8

26

s

120

184

(8)

»ort$

236

194

146

_ OAfi...

2S&.

763

201

575

2769

4,243

(9)

Equipment$

- — —

0

52

(10)

Travel$

372

372

Q

744

1,254

(11)

ODC'st

70

70

50.

. .20 __

90

_ 25Q

5Q

25Q

200110

1,865

(12)

Sub-Pool$

(13)

Indirect20.8%

15

JL5

JSi

1R

19

Q.

.52

129

——42. __385

661

(14)

Total$

3,261

2^551

_o_7*961

56,015

(2)

Mtt Mtri 1*1 AMI MMlilt tavi TMUK M Cofei III -9.71

ATTACHMENT B REM IIPQt1e 1 Of 3 WCC LABOR

Silt RtM*ri H. H. WBTIM Mil 4/2t/BSSWi 31S-42-71«

11i TMR EIBOTi

IM UK fUM KM

ll.l QMENT SITWTIOi

II. 1 EXIST 0FD

11.2 SITE UPS

II.I9P9EF

11.4 SITE VISIT 1 ISEI1

11.3 KVtEU HP HOW AM

12.1 NOME AM

12.1 Pnj PCI AM

12.1.1 mTH 1 9ftT1

12.2 «»

12.2.2 BV

12. 2.1 9M>

111 PCP IOM PUM1

1

112 MDCT KVICH1

111 FIM. MM PUD1

14.1 ODD 1 NMT1

1

ITOtd

PrvfmiMl 4 II72.K t/Hr. 1

Itan

a

»

t

4

41

»

II

a

u

»

41

M

a

41

t4

4X

1 t II

1 I4X 1

1 II

I 1741 1

1 I4t 1

1 ai 1

i ail i

I 2IB 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1113 1

I I4X 1

1 II

1 111! I

I 2717 1

1 2911 1

I II

1 3Kt 1

, 14X1

i nil i

1 4UI 1

i 1 1

(31219. 1

t^^AM^VfW

41.11

tan

11

41

4

1

14

a

H

1

u

It

II

1

It

221

llOMl 1

t/Hr.

I t

I 4*

I 1

I l%7

I 117

I 313

I 1172

• «4

I 1

I 1

I 1271

i 311

I I

i 911

t 717

i IB

i 1

I 311

I 1

i 717

I 1

i 1

:IM11.

IPrtfmioMl 21 X.17 t/Hr.

lltan t t

1 i I

1 i I

1 i I

1 2 I 74

1 1 1

1 1 I

1 II i 171

1 i I

1 1 I

1 II I 371

1 1 i 2%

1 I I

1 I I

1 I I

1 I 1

1 I 1

1 I 1

1 I 1

1 I 1

1 I 1

1 i I

i itiiin.i

IProfmioMl 11 21.43 t/Hr.

lltan i t

1 i 1

1 i 1

1 i I

1 i 1

1 I I

1 i 1

1 I I

1 I 1

1 i 1

1 i 1

1 i 1

1 t 1

1 i I

1 i 1

1 i 1

1 i I

1 I 1

1 I 1

1 i 1

1 i 1

1 i 1

1 I i 1

ITKtalcal1 11.33

Ittan ,

1 t i

1 t

1 1 i

1 14 i

1 i

1 It I

1 I

1 1

1 t

1 Ml

1 4 i

1 t

1 2 i

1 2 t

1 2 i

1 i

1 It I

1 i

1 4 i

1 t

1 i

2t/Hr.

t

in

•

232

441

I

3*4

I

I

1

I2t

I2t

I

tl

tl

tl

I

914

I

I2t

1

«

1 71 12431.3

ITtrimlcal 11 21.31 t/Hr.

lltan i t

1 i 1

1 i 1

1 1 tl 173

1 I 1

1 i 1

1 t I

1 i I

1 t 1

1 i I

1 i I

1 i I

1 i I

1 i I

1 i 1

1 I 1

1 i 1

1 1 t 171

1 t I

1 t 1

1 i 1

1 t 1

1 It 1343.21

ITOTHL TEDMICPllCltrlcal 31 UK 1 27.12 t/Hr.

titan t

1 It i

1 I I

1 M t

1 22 i

1 12 i

1 * I

1 Hi

1 1 i

1 I i

1 X i

1 41 i

1 1 i

1 IK i

1 X i

1 U I

1 I 1

1 112 i

i a t

1 U i

1 t4 I

1 1 1

1 M i*

* II

2117 1

I 1

4141 1

BS 1

US 1

3H1 1

an i

1 1

1 1

21411

2272 1

I 1

l%4 1

»I7 1

3ttl 1

I 1

tl% 1

I4X 1

H2t 1

4ttl 1

1 1

7131. 1

tan i t

4 i 111

t 1

2 i X

i 1

2 i X

2 t X

i 1

i 1

i I

2 i X

1 i 1

i 1

2 i X

2 i X

2 i X

I 1

1. 223

4 i III

4 i III

1 I 223

i 1

42 UIM.4

ICItrlcal1 22.32

Ittan i

1 12 i

1 I

1 4 i

1 2 I

1 2 I

1 12 i

1 11 i

1 I

1 I

1 1 i

1 4 i

1 i

1 4 i

1 4 i

1 4 i

1 i

1 24 i

1 4 i

1 It i

1 1 i

' '

2t/Hr.

t

271

I

»

43

43

271

223

1

1

IN

11

1

»

11

*

I

341

*XI

IM

1

1 III :»57.3

ICItrlcil 1 11 17.33 t/Hr. 1

lltan t t IM

1 i l l

1 i l l

1 i l l

1 2 I 33 1

1 I I I

1 2 i 33 1

1 i l l

1 I I I

1 t i l

1 i l l

1 t i IM 1

1 i l l

1 i l l

1 I I I

1 1 1 131 1

1 I I I

1 I I I

1 I I I

1 t 1 IM 1

1 I I I

1 i l l

1 24 i 4IM I

Total

Ml 1

32 I

1 1

It I

at t

it i

IK i

71 I

1 1

1 1

tt 1

31 i

1 i

11 i

t2 i

74 i

I I

144 i

a i

K 1

M t

1 t

IM :5?

t

2311

1

4»

in

783

3431

37t3

1

1

3173

24tt

1

2111

3713

4l4t

1

7S31

I6H

44K

3K3

11

III. 4 1

V*I

Xr

ATTACHMENT BPage 2 of 3

REM II

EXPENSES

Site Nuaben 201

Site NaMi Tar Lake

Phaset WP-1

» Code, 101-5L71

Site Manageri K. H. Kaufman

SSANi 3q5-d?-7iq?

Datei 26 April 1985

TASK

1.4 Site Visit

3.2 Agency Review

3.3 Final Work Plan

-_T.___.- ___._»_-r

TOTAL

Equipment13 $/day

Days

4

4

£

52

— --

52

Per Die**90/day

Days

4

1

1

—

6

$

360

90

25

540

Transpor-tation

t

J50

2SL^

j!fi2.

714

Sub-Pool

$

~

G ft A*20.8%

$

HZ

U

J.I

271

Total

$

£23.

449—

. _449__

1577EiHA.EXP

* Subcontractor pool excluded from G1A computation


REM II

ODC's

S1U Nuaftert 201

Site Mane i tar Lake

Wwsei HP-1

t* Codei 101-5171

Site Manageri K. H. Kastman

SSANi 395-42-7192

Datei 26 April 1985

Ei

TASK

0.0 Work Plan Memo"Existing

1.1 Information

]A2 Site. Maps ..

JL4.ISHLReview PRP

.l HojjLfJLftlL

2.0 Project Plans

-2*Q.tisrJLflML~—

-iilLttefiftflgnspJi-

TOTAL

MA.ODC

Xerox

$

20

50

IQ_._

5Q

iQ

100

....2o,o___iQP_

580

Blue-prints

$

5Q

50

Mall/Courier

$

50

—

5fl

50

100~""" — -

1QQ

—lQQ--__

450

Supplies

$

193 .

5Q.

150

Tele-phone

$

25

JLO ..

..25.

25._

50

_5J)

IflD

285

Computer

$

100

2.Q.Q.

JjO,

350

1

G 1 A20.8%

$

15

JH

__J^

lf^

2£.

Zi .

._H4

.22

388

TOTAL

$

85

JUL

.205.

?JJ

jm

_.4_21__.

_. JL

_.J23_

m* ~

2253

CO

Ol


4.0 SCHEDULE

The Schedule of Activities by task and subtask is presented in Attachment C.

We estimate that the Initial Site Evaluation Report (ISER) will be submitted

on or before 11 June 1985. A review of the Potentially Responsible Parties

Work Plan can be completed within 21 days if it 1s received after completion

of the ISER. If authorized promptly after completion of the ISER, the Draft

Work Plan and Final Work Plan will be submitted on or before 30 July 1985 and

24 September 1985, respectively.

The Schedule of Deliverables is presented in Attachment D and shows

distribution and approval dates. We have not Included distribution to any

identified potential responsible parties.

4-1

SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIESS/T£ ATTACHMINT C

A C T I V I T Y1915

WEEK END INC

0.0 PREPARE WORK PLAN MEMORANDUM

1.0 DEFINE CURRENT SITUATION

1.1 OITAIN EXISTING INFORMATION

1.2 PREPARE SITE MAP(S)

l.J DEVELOP INITIAL VISITHEALTH AND SAFETY PROTOCOL

I.* V IS IT SITE I PREPARE EXISTINGCONDITIONS MEMO

1.5 REVIEW PRP WORK PLAN

2.0 PREPARE PROJECT PLANS

2.1 PREPARE PROJECT OPERATIONS PLAN (POP)

2.2 PREPARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN CQAPP)

3.0 PREPARE WORK PLAN

) . 1 PREPARE DRAFT WORK PLAN

3.2 AGENCY REVIEW

3 . 3 PREPARE FINAL WORK PLAN

<«.0 COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT

%.l MONTHLY REPORT

A P R I L

S 12 19 26/

•

M A T

) 10

••

17

••

2<« 31

•

JUKI

7 1>>

7

21 21/

•

J V i T

S 12 19 26/

•

AU9UIT

2 9

•i

16

••

2J

P™

30

•

•

•

SIPTIMMI

6

•

13

••

20

•i

27

•

/

Iro

= DELIVERABLE T STARTING DATE UNCERTAIN

WCC, 201-WM-OELOE

SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES ATTACHMENT D

DELIVERABLE

0.0 HORK PLAN MEMORANDUM

. 1.0 CURRENT SITUATION

1.1 INITIAL SITE EVALUATION REPORT

1.2 SITE NAP(S)

1.3 SPPSEF

1.4 REVIEW PRP MONK PLAN

2.0 PROJECT PLANS

2.1 PROJECT OPERATIONS

2.2 HEALTH 1 SAFETT PLAN

2.3 QAPP

3.0 PREPARE tORK PLAN

3.1 DRAFT HORK PLAN

3.3 FINAL HORK PLAN

4.0 COORDINATION 1 MANAGEMENT

4.1 MONTHLT REPORTS

ASSIGNMENT

AUTH. DUE

4/11 5/7

4/11 6/11

4/11 6/11

4/11 6/11

4/11 *

4/11 9/24

4/11 9/24

4/11 9/24

4/11 7/30

4/11 9/24

Ninthly

QUALITY SUBMIT FOR SUBMIT TOCONTROL PtAN QUALITY K|M II USEPA STATE OTHER

<OCP> SURVEILLANCE pO* APPROVAL REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW

SUBMIT IUBMI1 3 3 2 <-, r <*ACTIVITY DATE ACTIVITY DATE | ° x 2 * ^ O 8 e e f e " c 5

A.l.a.c.d 4/29 4/29 4/30 4/30

A.I.I 6/4 6/4

A.I.I 6/4 6/4

A.l.a.b 5/14 5/14 5/14

A.1.2.C

A.l.a.c 8.27 8/27

A.l.i.b 8/27 8/27 8/28

A.l.i.e 8/27 8/27 8/28

A.l.a.d, 6/25 6/25 6/25 6/76B* 1A.I.I 9/10 9/10 9/10 9/tl

WCC, 201-HP1-DELOE

+ Due 21 doys after receipt by REM II

TAR LAKE


5.0 KEY STAFF

1. Kenneth H. Kastman, P.E., Woodward-Clyde Consultants, will be the REM IISite Manager for the Tar Lake assignment. His resume is Included as

Attachment E. His conflict of interest statement regarding this

assignment is included as Attachment F.

2. John W. Hawthorne, P.E., Camp Dresser & McKee, is the REM II Region V

Manager.

3. Camp Dresser & McKee will provide direction and input on health and

safety, quality assurance and on specific tasks as required.

4. ICF will provide direction and input into the Community Relations Plan.

5. Clement Associates will provide guidance on the exposure and risk

assessment and on the endangerment assessment.

6. C. C. Johnson and Associates will provide input on a task specific basis.

5-1

KENNETH H. KA5TMAN geo-environmental engineeringwaste site remedial action

geotechnical engineeringproject management

8DUCATION

Purdue University: MS, Degree in Geotechnical Engineering, 1967Valparaiso University: BS, Degree in Civil Engineering, 1966

REGISTRATION

Professional Engineer, Illinois, Wisconsin, New York, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY

Woodward-Clyde Consultants; Senior Project Engineer, 1981-DateSoil Testing Services, Inc; Principal Engineer, 1967-1981

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

Mr Kastman has been involved primarily with geo-environmental projects during the lastfive years. Representative project types include assessment of contaminated wastedisposal sites, research regarding soil/chemical interaction and mine reclamationprojects. Most recently, Mr Kastman was the project manager for an extensiveinvestigation to assess ground water contamination, select remedial action alternatives,develop health and environmental safety plans, provide detailed design and monitoringconstruction of site improvements at a hazardous waste disposal facility in Kansas. Theproject involved supervising 15 to 20 multidisciplinary field personnel and 10 to 15 officepersonnel during the cleanup implementation. Another recent project includedinvestigation of a large subsurface hydrocarbon plume in Montana, a 2-fluid phase pumptest, and design of the hydrocarbon recovery system. Other projects relating to siteremedial actions include a soil leaching study at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Denver;remedial action plan review for chlorinated hydrocarbon contamination of limestonebedrock in Niagara Falls; and several paint, cyanide and metal plating waste site studiesin the midwest. He has also been involved with permitting several waste managementfacilities in Texas and Michigan.

Mr Kastman has had extensive experience with waste disposal site liners, both clay andgeomembranes. He has recently been involved in testing of clay and bentonite soil linerswith strong acids, organics and landfill leachates, and has coauthored specifications forthe USEPA for "Construction of Flexible Membrane Liners for Hazardous Waste DisposalFacilities".

He was the project manager for a new hazardous waste landfill which was designed tocomply with 26 3uly 1982 RCRA Interim Final Regulations for Permitting Requirementsfor Land Disposal Facilities and which has subsequently been constructed and is receivingwastes; the design included a compacted clay liner and overlying geomembrane liner. An

KHK: 0<r/85/lo-t

Kenneth H. Kastman 2

additional hazardous waste storage cell has been designed utilizing natural clays,bentonite clay panels and geomembranes for liner systems to containdioxin-contaminated wastes from Times Beach, Missouri.

He has consulted on several research projects on soil/chemical interactions, includingtwo projects funded by the U.S. EPA involving mobile equipment to clean-up chemicalspills in soil; one included design of a grout barrier wall system to contain the chemical,along with a well injection/withdrawal system to pump detoxifying chemicals into the-contaminated soil area; the second project included a "soil scrubber" unit to remove andchemically treat contaminated soils and then replace them in the original site.

Mine reclamation projects have included an acid mine drainage evaluation and correctiveconstruction design at strip mines on Tebo Creek and Cedar Creek in Missouri; stability,siitation and erosion control at the Kickapoo State Park in Illinois and several minesubsidence evaluations for deep coal mines in Illinois. On the Cedar Creek and KickapooState Park projects Mr Kastman has directly designed and supervised field constructionactivities.

Mr Kastman's concentration in the geo-environmental field was an extension of ten yearsof experience as a geotechnical engineer. Significant projects which he managed include:development and implementation of a computer based geotechnical information retrievalsystem for the U.S. Naval Station and Shipyard, Charleston, South Carolina; geotechnicaifeasibility studies of three potential sites for Commonwealth Edison Power Plants;Phase II Geotechnical investigations for the U.S. Corps of Engineers, for two dams in theMuskeegum River watershed in Ohio; and research relative to uses to the Menard pres-suremeter for the Federal Highway Administration. Of the ten years of geotechnicalengineering experience, four were spent in the field monitoring, testing and supervisingconstruction and earthmoving activities.

AFFILIATIONS

American Society of Civil EngineeringInternational Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation EngineeringAmerican Society for Testing and MaterialsNational Society of Professional EngineersIllinois Society of Professional Engineers

PUBLICATIONS

"Hazardous Waste Landfill Geomembrane: Design, Installation and Monitoring", byKenneth H. Kastman, Proceedings of the First International Conference onGeomembranes, Denver, Colorado, June, 1984

"Permeability of Naturally Occurring Clay and Bentonite-Sand Mixtures to SeveralOrganics", by K. H. Kastman, W. A. Alexander, and M. E. Sachs, Sixth AnnualMunicipal and Industrial Waste Conference, Madison, Wisconsin, September, 1983

"The Impact of Subsurface Details on Ground Water Protection Near an Existing DisposalFacility", by D. M. Hendron and K. H. Kastman, Transactions of the Thirty-ThirdAnnual Sanitary Engineering Conference, the University of Kansas, Lawrence,Kansas, February 1983

KHK: 00/85/15-3

Kenneth H. Kastman

"Remedial Actions for Landfill Problems", by Kenneth H. Kastman, Proceedings of theFourth Annual Conference of Applied Research and Practice on Municipal andIndustrial Waste, Madison, Wisconsin, September 1981

"Mechanisms for Detoxifying Soil," by Kenneth H. Kastman and Kathyrn R. Huibregtse,; Proceedings of the X International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation

Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, June 1981

Jl^oil/Chemical Concerns in Hazardous Waste Siting," by Kathryn R. Huibregtse andKenneth H. Kastman, to be published in the Proceedings of the EnvironmentalEngineering Conference in New York, New York, August 1980

"Development of a Mobile System for Extracting Spilled Hazardous Materials from Soil,"by K. R. Huibregtse, R. C. Scholz, K. H. Kastman and J. Brugger, Proceedings ofthe 1980 National Conference on Control of Hazardous Materials Spills, May 1980

"In-Situ Testing with the Menard Pressuremeter," by Kenneth H. Kastman, Proceedingsof the FHWA Specialty Conference on Testing of Soft Ground, Washington D.C.,May 1979

"In Place Detoxification of Hazardous Spills in Soil," by Kathryn R. Huibregtse, Joseph P.Lafornara and Kenneth H. Kastman, Proceedings of the 51st Annual ConferenceWater Pollution Control Federation, Anaheim, California, April 1978

"Cyanide Waste Disposal Site Neutralization," by Kenneth H. Kastman, and R. EricZimmerman, Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference on GeotechnicalPractice for Disposal of Solid Waste Materials, held at the University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, June 1977

"Material Inspection and Approval," by Kenneth H. Kastman and John P. Gnaedinger,Concrete Construction Magazine, November 1976

"Analysis and Records - Dutch Hollow Dam," by Kenneth H. Kastman Performance ofEarth Supported Structures, Vol. I, Part I. Proceedings of the ASCE SpecialtyConference at Purdue University, June 1972

KHK: 00/85/1 5'4

11 East Adams StreetSuite 1500Chicago, Illinois 60603312-939-1000Telex 253875 (WOODWARD CGO)

ATTACHMENT F

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

MEMORANDUM;

To:

From:

Date:

Project:

Document No,

Subject:

Action:

D. F. DoyleManager of Technical OperationsCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc.One Center PlazaBoston, MA 02108

Kenneth H. Kastman, P.E.

7 May 1985

REM II - EPA Contract No.: 68-01-6939

201-WP1-CD-BBAV-1

Staff Conflict of Interest DeclarationSite: Tar Lake, Mancelona Township, Antrim County,MichiganWork Assignment No.: 101-5L71

Immediate Response

I have reviewed the above work assignment for the U.S. EPA Contract68-01-6939, Remedial Response Activities at Uncontrolled Hazardous WasteSites. Based upon this review and my understanding of the legalrequirements of this work, I certify that I have no known conflict ofinterest associated with this assignment based upon the known potentialresponsible parties or my past work experience with this site, if any.Also, I understand my professional obligation to inform any staffworking at my direction on this assignment of the conflict of interestrequirements and ensure that such staff have no such conflicts ofinterest.

Kenneth H. Kastman, P.E.REM II Site Manager

KHK/cf

cc: J. G. CurtisCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc.7630 Little River TurnpikeSuite 500Annondale, VA 22003

Consulting Eng'neers Geologistsand Environmental Scientists

Offices in Other Principal Cities

5-5

u

1

, •

*J WORK PLAN MEMORANDUMTAR LAKE

Mancelona Township, Antrim County, Michigan

Work Assignment No. 101-5L71

7 May 1985

Document No. 201-WP1-WM-BBAS-2

1*** Company Confidential ***

I

J. This Work Plan Memorandum, prepared by REM II Team in accordance with theitems of U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract No. WA 68-01-6969, iscompany confidential.

1^m t ( CfC -'C

* S /u,

6'

Tar Lake•"• Work Plan Memorandum

« Assumptions: o REM II approved program plans and approved project plans

« from other projects will form the basis of the project

plans required for the Mj r tCp*ifoJjIKa'*iaFl4»'i#

m site.

• o The Site Health and Safety Plan, Site Management Plan,

and Sampling and Analysis Plan will be developed in

^ their entirety.

^ o Laboratory Quality Control will be performed by the

*"" USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) and the USEPA

, Central Region Laboratory (CRL).

o Project plans will be developed in parallel with the

| Work Plan (Task 3) and will be finalized following

receipt of USEPA Comments on the Work Plan.

SUBTASK 2.1 - PROJECT OPERATIONS PLANS

* Subtask 2.1.1 - Health and Safety Plan

it- A site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HSP) will be prepared for approval,

using input from Task 1. The plan will include:

o Personnel protective equipment requirements keyed to generalized sitelocation and activity,

•* o Safety equipment Inventory,

• o Training requirements,

o Medical surveillance program,

• o Specific medical procedures, as appropriate,

o Personnel hygiene requirements,

* o Contingency plan and emergency procedures,

Jl ,2-6, ___.

,J _|>_ _^_. ._

fit, tatori Milit* NMI TMAC Coin III-IT!

Silt

ATTACHMENT BPane 1 of 3

i R. N. MSTWH

MCC

REM II

LABOR

-_IM mum toeitl.l DOT IITWTIW

II. 1 1ST Wit| , , ...

11.2 Iff ftPS

11.3 pwer;

11.4 in VISIT i ist«

11.3 VltV W» «DW TUH

i ; 12.1 towc run

12.1 mtmfuw

12. i.i WITH i srmt . .IM.t fITt MNT WJH

12.2 m

12.2.1 fT

1 ; . * . , . -

13.1 A» Km WWt •"

13(1 «t KM PUD J

13.2 MCICT mm ii . . ,/i3.3fiw.ie* nnt /

14.1 am i mmt . ......ii(mil \

IPrtfmlMt 4 II72. R t/Hr. 1

Hnrt t t If

21 t I4X 1

I 1 1

(4 t 1741 t

t t (HI

4 I 211 t

41 I 2113 1

31 i 2IB 1

i II

l II

II i 11(3 1

M l I4X 1

l 1 t

II l 1311 1

31 l tTi 7 1

41 1 2113 1

1 II

• I 3W 1

\ t» i MX 1

41 t 2113 1

t4 l 4UI 1

1 1 1

4X I33?I3, 1

V«fM<l«Mt 341.11 t/Hr.

kxn t 1

II I 412

1 1

41 t l«7

4 l 117

1 I 313

34 l 1(72

21 1 IM

t 1

I 1

21 1 1271

1 t 313

t 1

12 i 9H

II I 717

II t NS

t I

1 t 3%)

i 1

K t W

i 1

i 1

221 tlWII.

IPrvfnfloMl 2 Itofmli1 3&.17 t/Hr. 1 21.43

IHMTf 1 t INMTI 1

t I I I t

1 I I I 1

1 I I I 1

1 2 1 74 1 l

1 I I I 1

1 I I I t

1 II 1 371 1 1

1 I I I 1

1 I I I t

1 II I 371 1 l

1 1 I 2% 1 1

1 I I I I

1 i l l t

1 I I I l

1 I I I t

1 I I I t

1 I I I t

1 I I I I

1 I I I l

1 I I I l

t i l l l

t N illtl.l 1 1 i

rat t 1t/Hr. 1

t II

I 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 t

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 t

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

ttttailril 211.33 t/Hr.

tMTf t 1

1 1 in

i i

1 1 »

14 1 441

1 1

II 1 3*4

t 1

t 1

1 1

4ll If*

4 1 I2t

I 1

2 t U

2 t (3

2 i U

t 1

It I 3M

l 1

4 i IS

t 1

l 1

71 i2*31.3

ITKfcnlrtl 11 21.31 l/Hr.

(tart 1 t

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 ll 173

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 I

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 I

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 t 1

i 1 1 m

i i i

i i i

i i i

i i i

i u 1343.21

nom nDmniieitritii 31 LUC 1 27.12 I/H-.

INMTf | | |

1 K l 2137 1

t 1 1 II

1 W t 4|M 1

i s i tat i

1 12 1 MS 1

1 * t 3M1 1

1 H I 3331 1

t 1 1 II

1 It II

1 X 1 2141 1

1 4t 1 2272 1

1 1 l II

1 1 32 t l%4 1

t X t 3(17 1

1 U t Ml 1

1 1 l II

1 112 t (1% 1

1 21 I I»X 1

1 (I l 3K( 1

1 (4 l 4«M 1

1 1 1 II

1 Ml |47W. 1

Wl , t

4 l III

t 1

2i X

i 1

2 i X

2 t X

i 1

i 1

i 1

2t X

Ii 1

t 1

2 t X

2t X

2 i X

i 1

1 i 223

4 t III

4 i III

1 i m

i 1

42 illM.4

Itltrlc.l 21 22.32 l/Hr.

IHwi 1 1

1 12 1 271

1 1 1

1 4 1 *

1 2 t 43

1 2 l 43

1 12 l 271

1 II l 223

1 I 1

1 I 1

1 1 1 IN

1 4 t H

1 l 1

1 4 t *

1 4 l »

1 4 t 11

1 l 1

1 24 i 341

1 4 l It

1 II i 3CI

1 t i tW

1 i 1

1 III t?M7.J

ICtKlril 1 11 17.33 t/Mr. t

IMMT1 1 1 IN

1 I I I

t I I I

1 i l l

1 (1 33 1

t I I I

1 t 1 33 1

1 I I I

1 I I I

1 I I I

1 t i l

1 1 I IM 1

1 I I I

1 i l l

1 i l l

1 1 l 131 1

1 I I I

t i l l

1 i l l

1 ( 1 IM 1

1 i l l

1 i l l

1 24 l 4K.4 l

Trtil

nn i 1

9 i 2311

1 t 1

* 1 4213

H l 137

K t 713

IK 1 3431

71 I 37(3

1 I 1

1 I 1

K i 3173

31 1 t4tt

1 1 t

31 l 2111

U t 37(3

74 i 4IH

1 I t

144 t 7(31

21 1 I(H

K 1 44K

M l 3KJ

t l t

KM t3?m.4

-7V


REM II

EXPENSES

{Site 201

Site NaiW! Tar Lake

Pftaset HP-1

Code,

L/Y

Site rtentgert

SSANt

^ H. Kaufman

D.te. 26 April 1985

TASK

1.4 Site Visit

3.2 Agency Review

3.3 Final Work Plan

— —

TOTAL

/ Equipment/ 13 |/day

/ Oiys

\D

4

$

52

52

Per Olent90/day

Days

4

1

1

-"

6

t

360

90

90

540

Transpor-tation

t

J50_ _.

2U2.

2SL

_________

7H

Sub-PooT

$

G ft A*20.8%

$

HZ

llII

271

Total

t

523.,

443__

. -449__

"~ — ~ —_ _»»__.-_

1577

Ien

* Subcontractor pool excluded from GIA computation

CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.7630 LITTLE RIVER Tl 'RNPIKE

SUITE 500ANNANDALE. VIRGINIA 22003

703 642-5500

WORK PLAN MEMORANDUM

Documents

Transcript of WORK PLAN MEMORANDUM