Word recognition in normal reading
-
Upload
nelle-olson -
Category
Documents
-
view
38 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Word recognition in normal reading
![Page 1: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Word recognitionin normal reading
Sara C. Sereno
Collaborators: RAs/PGs:
Paddy O’Donnell Sébastien Miellet
Hartmut Leuthold Graham Scott
Christopher Hand
![Page 2: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Word Recognition
• What factors affect word recognition?
• How can word recognition processes be accurately measured?
• How can effects be interpreted?
![Page 3: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Orthography of language– English vs. Hebrew or Japanese
• Intraword (sublexical) variables– word-initial bi/tri-grams clown vs. dwarf– spelling-to-sound regularity hint vs. pint– neighborhood consistency made vs.
gave– morphemes
• prefix vs. pseudo-prefix remind vs. relish• compound vs. pseudo-compound cowboy vs. carpet
What factors affect word recognition?
![Page 4: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What factors affect word recognition?
• Word (lexical) variables– word length duke vs. fisherman– word frequency student vs. steward– AoA rabbit vs. violin– expert vocabulary voxel– syntactic class open/closed-class; A,N,V– ambiguity bank vs. edge, brim– concreteness/imagability tree vs. idea– animacy dog vs. cup– affective tone love vs. farm vs. fire
![Page 5: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What factors affect word recognition?
• Extraword (supralexical) variables– Contextual predictability
Neutral He bought a large plant for his garden.
Biasing Terry went to the new gardening centre. He bought a large plant for his garden.
– Syntactic complexity
Trans. Mary took the book
VERB Mary knew the book
Intrans. Mary hoped the book
on the table.was good.
on the table.was good.
on the table.was good.
![Page 6: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Extraword (supralexical) variables– Discourse factors
Focus The dog chased the cat today.
The cat was chased by the dog today.
What the dog chased was the cat today.
It was the cat that was chased by the dog today.
Elaborative inferences & anaphora
What factors affect word recognition?
… The mugger her with his weaponweapon…
He threw the knife into the bushes and ran away.
stabbedassaulted
![Page 7: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What factors affect word recognition?
• Language skill– beginning (novice) vs. skilled (expert) readers– normal vs. dyslexic vs. neuropsychological patient
How can word recognition processesbe accurately measured?
![Page 8: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Measure Task Time Res.“electrical” imaging single word presentation ~80-500 ms (EEG, MEG) word-by-word reading (P1,N1,EPN,N400)
Eye movements in fixation time, location & ~250 ms normal reading sequence of EM’s
Stnd. word recogn. naming ~500 ms ± priming, masking, lexical decision RT ~600 ms lateralized present. categorization ~800 ms
“blood flow” imaging single word presentation seconds (PET, fMRI)
![Page 9: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Thisisawordbywordpresentationofasentenceatafastreading-likerate.
Word-by-word reading: 200 ms per word
![Page 10: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Thisisawordbywordpresentationofasentenceataslowratetypically usedinERPstudies.
Word-by-word reading: 600 ms per word
![Page 11: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Normal Reading
![Page 12: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.
*
![Page 13: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.
*
![Page 14: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.
*
![Page 15: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.
*
![Page 16: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.
*
![Page 17: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.
*
![Page 18: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.
*
![Page 19: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.*
![Page 20: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.*
![Page 21: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
This is an approximation of normal reading
in real time.*
![Page 22: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The importance of making eye movements in normal reading
Cond1 There was a box of…
Cond2 There was an enormous box of…
Cond1 She saw a cat in the…
Cond2 She saw a cup in the…
The measure affects what is being measured:– Perception of text influences how EMs made.– Location/duration of EMs affect perception.
![Page 24: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Theoretical approaches– Interactive (top-down) vs. Modular (bottom-up)
• Additive factors
How can effects be interpreted?
StimulusQuality
Context
FrequencyRT
RT
![Page 25: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Modelling
How can effects be interpreted?
![Page 26: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Modelling– Repeated measures multiple
regression analyses:
Oculomotor-related factorslaunch distance to wordlocation of fixation within
wordnumber of fixations on wordword lengthword frequencycontextual predictability
Language-related factors
How can effects be interpreted?
![Page 27: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Factors Measures Approachorthographybi-/tri-gramsregularityneighborhoodmorphologylengthfrequencyjargonword classambiguityimagabilityanimacyemotionalitypredictabilitysyntactic prefs.focusinferenceanaphoraskill
ERPs+
word-by-word(slow) presentation
Eye movements +
normal reading
EM-ERPco-registration?
Additive factors
Repeated measuresmultiple regression
![Page 28: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Distributed hierarchical visual processing in primateslexical humans
higher-levelsemantics
syntax
meanings
word forms
letters
features
![Page 29: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Why?
• Precisely delineate the time course of different levels of linguistic processing.
• Help inform a temporally realistic neural circuitry of normal reading.
![Page 30: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Measurement
EMs = best on-line measure of visual word recognition in the context of normal reading
ERPs = best real-time measure of brain activity associated with the perceptual and cognitive processing of words
![Page 32: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
(Sereno & Rayner, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003)
![Page 33: Word recognition in normal reading](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110100/56812b0b550346895d8ef280/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
(Sereno & Rayner, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003)
Sereno, Rayner, & Posner (1998). NeuroReport.Sereno, Brewer, & O’Donnell (2003). Psych. Sci.