Wireless traffic theory and handoff

25
ADVANCE MOBILE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION Dr. Munaf Rashid (cell capacity and reuse, Traffic Theory, Channel assignment strategies, Hand off strategies)

description

Cell Capacity and reuse, Traffic Theory, Channel Assignment strategies, Hand off strategies

Transcript of Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Page 1: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

ADVANCE MOBILE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Dr. Munaf Rashid(cell capacity and reuse, Traffic Theory,

Channel assignment strategies, Hand off strategies)

Page 2: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

CELL CAPACITY AND REUSE

• Consider a cellular system with s duplex channel• Suppose each cell is allocated with K channels .let

these S channels can be divided among N cells (cluster).

S=KN• If a cluster of N cell is replicated M times in the

system, the total number of duplex channel, C, can

be used as a measure of the system capacity.

C=MKN=MS

Page 3: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

CELL CAPACITY AND REUSE

• If a cluster size N is reduced keeping the cell size fixed, more clusters are required to cover the entire area of interest, i.e.,

M C• Smaller N (higher capacity) implies larger

co-channel interference which may results inlow Quality of service (QOS).

Page 4: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DEFINITION OF SOME TERMS

• Setup Time: the time required to allocate the radio channel to a requesting user.

• Blocked call: A call that cannot be completed at the time of request due to congestion (lost call).

• Holding Time: the average duration of typical call• Request Rate: Average number of calls per unit time (ʎ)• Traffic Intensity: Measure of channel time utilization (Erlang)• Load: Traffic intensity across the entire radio spectrum • A channel kept busy for one hour is defined as having a load

of one Erlang.

Page 5: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DEFINITION OF SOME TERMS

• Grade Of Service (GoS) : A measure of congestion which is specified as a probability.

• The Probability of call being Blocked (Erlang B).

• The probability of call being delayed beyond a certain amount of time (Erlang C).

Page 6: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY• Average no of MSs requesting service (request/time)

Average arrival rate= ʎ• Average time for which MS requires service

Average Hold time= T• Offered load a= ʎ T (Erlangs)• E.g, In a cell with 100 MSs on an average 30 requests are generated

during an hour (3600 sec) with average hold time T=360 seconds (6 minutes)

• Then arrival rate ʎ= 30/3600 request/sec.• A channel kept busy for one hour is defined as one Erlang• Offered load

Page 7: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY

• Average arrival rate during a short interval t is given by ʎt .

• Assuming Poison Distribution of service request the probability P(n,t) for n calls to arrive in an interval of length t is given by

• Assuming µ to be the service rate, probability of each call to terminate during interval t is given by µ t.

• Thus probability of given call requires service of each time t or less is given by

Page 8: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY• Probability of arriving call being blocked is

Where S is the number of channels in a group• Probability of an arrival call being delayed is

Where c(s,a) is the probability of an arriving call being delayed with ‘a’load and ‘s’ channels.

Erlang B formulae

Erlang C formulae

Page 9: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY

Page 10: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY (Example 1)

• Consider a cell with – S=2 channels– 100 mobile stations – Generating on an average 30 requests/hour– Average holding time T=360 seconds (6 minutes) Load a= (30 × 6)/60 = 3 ErlangsBlocking Probability B(S , a)=0.53Total number of rerouted calls =30 × 0.53=16Efficiency =3(1-0.53)/2=0.7

Page 11: Wireless traffic theory and handoff
Page 12: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

ERLANG B SYSTEM

Page 13: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Traffic Theory (Example 2)• Consider a system with

– 100 cells – Each cell has S=20 channels– The users average ʎ=2 calls/hour– The average duration of each call (T) is 3 min– How many number of users can be supported if the

allowed probability of blocking is 2%?• From Erlang B chart total carried traffic=13 Erlangs• Traffic Intensity per user= ʎT=0.1 Erlangs• Total number of isers that can be supported per cell =

13/0.1=130 users/cell.• Total number of users that can be supported =13,000

Page 14: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Traffic Theory (Example 3)• Consider another system with

– 100 cells – Each cell has S=20 channels– The users average ʎ=2 calls/hour– The average duration of each call (T) is 3 min– How many number of users can be supported if the

allowed probability of blocking is 0.2%?• From Erlang B chart total carried traffic=10 Erlangs• Traffic Intensity per user= ʎT=0.1 Erlangs• Total number of users that can be supported per cell =

10/0.1=100 users/cell.• Total number of users that can be supported =10,000

Page 15: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Traffic Theory (Example 4)• Consider a systems with:

– Total number of channels= 20– Probability of blocking constraint=1%

Approach 1: Divide 20 channels in 4 Trunks of 5 channelsTraffic capacity for one trunk (5 channels)=1.36 ErlangsTraffic capacity for four trunks (20 channels)=5.44 Erlangs

Approach 2: Divide 20 channels in 2 trunk of 10 channelsTraffic capacity for one trunk (10 channels)=4.46 ErlangsTraffic capacity for 2 trunk (20 channels)=8.92 Erlangs

Approach 3: Use 20 channels as such Traffic capacity for one trunk (20 channels)=12.00 Erlangs

Allocation of channels has a major impact!Conclusion: It is better to have larger poll or trunk

Page 16: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT STARTEGIES

• A scheme for increasing capacity and minimizing interference is required

• Channel assignment strategies can be classified as either fixed or dynamic.

• The choice of channel assignment strategy impacts the performance of the system how a call is managed when a mobile user is hand off from one cell to another cell

Page 17: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

FIXED CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT

• Each cell is assigned a predetermined set of voice channels.

• Any call attempt within the cell can only be served by the unused channels in that particular cell

• If all the channels in the cell are occupied the call is blocked the user does not get service

• In variation of the fixed channel assignment a cell can borrow channels from it’s neighboring cell if it’s own channels are full

Page 18: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DYNAMIC CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT

• Voice channels are not allocated to different cellspermanently.

• Each time a call request is made , the Bs requesta channel from the Msc.

• Msc allocates the channel to the requested callusing an algorithm that takes into account

• The likelihood of future blocking• The frequency of use of the candidate channels• The reuse distance of the channel and• Other cost functions.

Page 19: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DYNAMIC CHANNEL ASSIGNEMENT

• To ensure the minimum QoS the Msc only allocates a given frequency if that frequency is not currently in use in the cell, or any other cell which falls within the limiting reuse distance.

• DCA reduces the likelihood of blocking thus increasing the capacity of the system

• DCA strategies requires the Msc to collect the real time data on channel occupancy and traffic distribution on a continuous basis.

Page 20: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

HANDOFF

• When a mobile moves in different cells while the call is in progress the Msc must automaticallytransfer a call to a new channel belonging to the new BS.

• The Hand off operation involves indentifying new base station and the allocation of the voice and control signals associated with the new base station.

• Handoff must be per formed successfully, as infrequently as possible, and must be imperceptible to the user.

Page 21: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

HANDOFF REGIONSignal Strength due to BS i

Signal Strength due to BS j

Pi(x) Pj(x)

By Looking at the variation of Signal Strength from either Base station it is possible to decide on the optimum area where handoff can take place

Minimum receiver

sensitivity

Page 22: Wireless traffic theory and handoff
Page 23: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Hand Off Region

• Hand off is made when the received signal at theBS falls below a pre-specified threshold.

• In deciding when to hand off it is important toensure that the drop In the signal level is not dueto the momentary fading.

• In order to ensure this the Bs monitors the signalfor a certain period of time before initiating handoff

• The length of the time needed to decide ifhandoff is necessary depends on the speed atwhich the mobile is moving.

Page 24: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

HANDOFF STRATEGIES

• In the first generation Analog cellular system thesignal strength measurement are made by Bs andare supervised by the MSC.

• In the second generation systems that use TDMAtechnology , Mobile Assisted HandOff MAHO areused.

• In MAHO every MS measures the received powerfrom the surrounding BS and continually reportthese values to the corresponding Bs.

• Handoff is initialized if the signal strength ofneighboring BS exceeds that of current BS

Page 25: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

SOFT HANDOFF

• CDMA spread spectrum cellular system providesa unique hand off capability.

• Unlike channelized wireless systems that assignradio channels during a handoff (called hardhandoff) the spread spectrum Ms share the samechannel in every cell.

• The term handoff here implies that a different Bshandles the radio communication task

• The ability to select between the instantaneousreceived signal from different Bs is called softHand off.