wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON...
Transcript of wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON...
![Page 1: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
wireless distribution in the future media landscape
Broadcast-like services ETSI – EBU | Sophia Antipolis | 6th May 2015
P ER B JÖRKMAN
H E AD O F D I ST R I BUT I O N
SVERIGES TELEVISION
![Page 2: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Public Service Broadcaster
Financed by license fee: approx. €200 per year.
Total revenue: €4b
Viewing share of 35%
SVT1 is Sweden's largest channel (21% view.sh)
Affiliates in 33 cities all around Sweden.
2100 employees
![Page 3: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The SVT Offer
![Page 4: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The SVT Offer
PayTV15%
FTA10%
Cable50%
Satellite15%
IPTV10%
DTT
25%
Fiber29%
xDSL30%
Cable TV13%
Mobile B.B18%
Not Connected
10%
4,5 million Households
![Page 5: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
From a
Desktop Internet World
Through a
Mobile Internet World
To a
Internet World of Gadgets
The pathway of devices
![Page 6: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The LARGE Screen
![Page 7: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Is there a future for TV?
LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND
MULTICAST vs. UNICAST
![Page 8: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3.000 million
SVT Distribution
91 million
(2014)
Hours
SVT Play Linear TV
3%
97%
: 34 million hours
: 200 million hours
0
20
40
60
80
100
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Delivered hours (million)
85%
15%
SVT PlayLinear TV
Viewing Cost
![Page 9: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Multicast vs. Unicast
MULTICAST is a STRATEGIC NECESSITY
![Page 10: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The promise of Multicast
3G - MBMS
4G - eMBMS
5G - ?
![Page 11: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
5G Multicast - Key requirement
Easy to use for consumersFree to air
Quality of Service
Extreme robustness
No gate keeper
Geographically independent
![Page 12: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Free to Air
¤ A foundation for Public Service Media.
¤ Media financed by licensee fee (or eq.) need Free-to-air distribution
¤ Also important for commercial TV in many markets. (e.g. UK, France, Italy, Spain)
![Page 13: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
No Gate Keeper
¤ DTT offers the possibility to watch TV without being registered or monitored.
¤ Direct relation between broadcaster and viewer.
![Page 14: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Quality of Service
¤ Broadcast services rely on constant quality in the delivery chain.
¤ Networks with “best effort” will not do. Quality must be independent of number of viewers.
![Page 15: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Extreme robustness
¤ Governments often rely on DTT to be a important tool for communication in case of emergency.
¤ A lot of investments have been made in the terrestrial network to ensure operation even under times of severe strain on society.
![Page 16: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Easy to use for consumers
¤ All television sets have integrated digital terrestrial receivers.
¤ Very simple setup and configuration process with automatic channel scanning.
![Page 17: wireless distribution in the future media landscape ... Is there a future for TV? LINEAR TV vs. ON DEMAND MULTICAST vs. UNICAST. 3.000 million SVT Distribution 91 million (2014) Hours](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052100/60397596387893064d29aa5c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Geographically independent
¤ Universal coverage. (e.g. Sweden 99,8%)
¤ Same technical quality regardless of location.