Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.
-
Upload
judith-fisher -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
3
Transcript of Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.
![Page 1: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Winning with Losing Games
An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox
![Page 2: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
A Fair Game Start with a capital of $0.
Flip a fair coin.
If the coin lands on heads, then your capital increases by $1.
If the result is tails, then your capital decreases by $1.
![Page 3: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A Simple GameAs before, the starting capital is $0.
Flip a biased coin–one that will land on tails 50.5% of the time.
Increase the capital by $1 if the coin lands on heads and decrease it by $1 if the coin lands on tails.
![Page 4: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Graphical Approach
Given the above graph, one can form an adjacency matrix which will allow for further analysis.
1
3
2
.495
.505
100
495.0505.
001
$0
-$1
$1
![Page 5: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A Complicated Game
Start with a capital of $0.
If the capital is a multiple of 3, then flip a coin that lands on tails 90.5% of the time.
If the capital is not a multiple of 3, then flip a coin which lands on heads 74.5% of the time.
As before, a flip of heads results in gaining $1 while tails results in losing $1.
![Page 6: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Graphical Approach
1
2
7
6
5
4
3
.745
.745
.095
.745
.745
.255
.255
.255
.255
.905
$0
$1
$2
$3
-$1
-$2
-$3
![Page 7: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Matrix Representation
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
255 0 745 0 0 0 0
0 255 0 745 0 0 0
0 0 905 0 095 0 0
0 0 0 255 0 745 0
0 0 0 0 255 0 745
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
1000000
954.00000046.
821.00000179.
00000
408.00000592.
302.00000698.
0000001This matrix is the above matrix raised to the 500th power.
.555 .445
![Page 8: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Introduction to the Paradox
Coin A: Lands on heads 49.5% of the time and lands on tails 50.5% of the time. This coin is used when playing the Simple Game.Coin B: Lands on heads 9.5% of the time and lands on tails 90.5% of the time. This coin is used when on playing the Complicated Game and one’s capital is a multiple of 3.
Coin C: Lands on heads 74.5% of the time and lands on tails 25.5% of the time. This coin is used in the
Complicated Game when the capital is not a multiple of 3.
![Page 9: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Parrondo’s Paradox
Form a new game which is a combination of the Simple and Complicated games.At each juncture, use a fair coin to randomly choose which game to play.
Randomly alternating between the two games will yield a winning result although both are losing.
This is Parrondo’s Paradox.
![Page 10: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Illustrations of Parrondo’s Paradox
Chess It is sometimes necessary to sacrifice pieces in order to produce a winning outcome.
Farming It is known that both sparrows and insects can eat all the crops. However, by having a combination of sparrows and insects, a healthy crop is harvested.
Genetics Some genes that are considered
to be detrimental can actually be beneficial given the correct environmental conditions.
![Page 11: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A Brief Example
Game Played
Coin Flipped
Heads/Tails
Capital0
Complicated
Coin C Tails -1
Simple Coin A Tails -2
Simple Coin A Heads -1
Simple Coin A Heads 0
Simple Coin A Tails -1
Complicated
Coin B Heads 0
Simple Coin A Heads 1
Complicated
Coin C Heads 2
Complicated
Coin C Tails 1
Simple Coin A Heads 2
![Page 12: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Example -- Graphically
3
17
15
12
9
6
14
11
8
5
2
16
13
10
7
4
$0
$2
$1
-$1
-$2
-$3
$3
![Page 13: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Parrondo’s Graphical Game
1
3
17
15
12
9
6
14
11
8
5
2
16
13
10
7
4
Simple
Complicated
$0
$2
$1
-$2
-$3
$3
-$1
![Page 14: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Matrix Representation
10000000000000000
745.0000255.00000000000
05.05.0000000000000
495.0000505.00000000000
00745.00000255.00000000
00005.05.0000000000
00495.00000505.00000000
00000095.00000905.00000
00000005.05.0000000
00000495.00000505.00000
00000000745.00000255.00
00000000005.05.0000
00000000495.00000505.00
00000000000745.0000255.
00000000000005.05.0
00000000000495.0000505.
00000000000000001
![Page 15: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Matrix Powers
10000000000000001
940.000000000000000060.
910.000000000000000089.
881.000000000000000119.
813.000000000000000187.
765.000000000000000235.
717.000000000000000283.
459.000000000000000541.
000000000000000
594.000000000000000406.
460.000000000000000540.
427.000000000000000573.
395.000000000000000605.
318.000000000000000682.
265.000000000000000735.
212.000000000000000788.
00000000000000001
The above matrix represents the combined game after 500 coin flips. Notice, for example, that the probability that you go from Vertex 9 to Vertex 17 is .527. Thus, one is more likely to progress up the graph.
.527.473
![Page 16: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Generalizations
Let the probabilities associated with each coin be defined as follows: Coin A
P(H) = .5 – P(T) = .5
Coin B P(H) = .1 – P(T) = .9 +
Coin C P(H) = .75 – P(T) = .25 +
Let the probability of playing the Simple game be p and the probability of playing the Complicated game be 1-p.
![Page 17: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
A Deeper Analysis
Given the generalizations, I sought to determine the widest p range that could be used so that the Combined Game was still winning.
Once this p range was determined, I then attempted to find the optimal p which would allow for the widest range.
![Page 18: Winning with Losing Games An Examination of Parrondo’s Paradox.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082413/56649cf55503460f949c4b30/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusions
The p range, given that
was calculated to be (.08, .84).
The optimal p was found to be p = .40. Given this p, the range was calculated to be (0, .013717), accurate to the millionth position.