Wind/Gas Cooptimization

17
Copyright © Tri Modal 2010 “Renewable Plus” Presentation February 2011 Eamonn McCormick – CEO [email protected] 310-382-0453

description

Overview of Tri Modal\'s renewable Plus Product and how to cooptimize wind and gas

Transcript of Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Page 1: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

“Renewable Plus” PresentationFebruary 2011Eamonn McCormick – CEO

[email protected]

Page 2: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Company Background• Focused on planning and optimization of “Wind/Solar/fossil” generation

portfolios• Goal is to assist “industry consortiums” to deliver “Firm/Shapable

Renewable Energy Product” we call “Renewable Plus”

Page 3: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Current Environment is Challenging1. Recession:

A significant drop in energy growth in all regions and indeed in areas like Phoenix demand has dropped vis a vis 2006 levels.

Impacted the wind industry growth for the first time since the early 2000's. Indeed number of MWs this year is estimated to be 40% down on last year.

Sluggish recovery means more focus on optimization of existing assets, replacement of existing plants, reducing costs of renewable and planning for the mid to long term rather than shorter term traditional wind projects

2. Regulatory situation has not developed at the Federal level slowing growth furtherNational RPSFederal GHG standardsLittle regulatory stimulus to the market.

3. The industry is stretched by credit crises and other initiatives such as smart grid.4. There is a significant overhang of renewable projects from 2008/2009 that is depressing

interest in new projects5. Many states are facing increased technical challenges integrating higher percentages of wind. 6. Large European players like Acciona retrenching as they are impacted by fall in Euro and

financial crisis at home

Page 4: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Implications

• The implication is that buyers and investors are reluctant to invest or sign PPAs for high cost traditional wind farms and are in a “wait and see” attitude

• Game is changing due to a need to address– Long term cost & demand implications of sluggish recovery– “Interstate” transmission projects and which are likely to evolve– Changing technology– “Renewables integration” with existing infrastructure– Need to address “Reliability” as renewables increase as % of the

generation capacity

• What we have determined is that the industry requires a new approach that will provide strategic advantage over competitors both in the short, medium and longer term.

Page 5: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Questions?

It is clear that the current US wind industry is locked into a high cost business model. The key to future success is determined by:

1. How can we lower cost of wind and solar?2. How can we add more value to wind and solar?3. How can we reduce wind integration costs and reliability issues?4. How can we optimize existing fossil generation portfolio?5. How can we combine wind/solar/fossil to create a new highly competitive

product that is more akin to traditional fossil generation?6. How can we create an optimized business model for generators that attracts

strategic customers?7. How can this generation model be used to attract strategic transmission

partners?8. What kind of new “renewable plus” generation entity is required?

Page 6: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Typical Daily Demand Profile versus Wind Generation Profile in ERCOT

Typical 24 Hours

Demand ProfileVs

Wind Generation

Page 7: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

How can we combine wind/solar/fossil to create a new highly competitive product that is more akin to traditional fossil generation?

7

RENEWABLE PLUS?

Page 8: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

The Renewable Plus Consortium Example

Wind Solar Fossil& Nuclear Storage

Firm/Shapable Renewable Energy Product

Renewable Plus

Gen Co.

Utility Customer

Page 9: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Renewable Plus Product

WIND

Fossil& NUCLEAR

SOLAR

CSP

Photo Voltaic

Low Cost

Configured to Demand

Environment & Regulation Friendly

Reliable

Low Risk

Co-Optim

ized

Coal Plant

Storage

Gas Plant

Nuclear

Page 10: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Wind, Gas, Solar, Storage not sufficient for true co-optimization• Co-Optimize

– New Components• Wind• Nuclear• Solar• Gas• Storage

• AND – Existing plants

• Fossil• Nuclear• Gas

• AND– Transmission (Interstate Highways and Local Byways)

• AND CONSIDER– Need to blend energy sources– Configure to customer needs

10

Page 11: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Example of a Simple “Renewable Plus” Generation Plant (Wind, Gas, Storage)

11

1. Wind farm generates electricity2. Off peak energy stored as

compressed air3. Compressed air released during

on-peak hours4. Compressed air energy

converted to electricity and blended with electricity generated from gas

Page 12: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Renewable Plus Generation Consortium – Back to an old approach to generation• Assuming it is possible via the “Renewable Plus” approach to

combine “renewables and traditional generation” to create a “renewable plus plant” that operates at low cost like a traditional “dispatchable plant”

• Then:– We can use the proven utility model of utilities forming consortiums to build

major “dispatchable plants”– Similar approach to proven Nuclear and Coal Plant model (like Palo Verde)

where “consortium” owns and operates the plant based on their aggregated needs

– No longer makes sense for independent small scale renewables as plant needs to be engineered to exact “consortium” specifications

– Approach can be used to plan for retirement of large old coal based generation while minimizing cost, increasing “green” energy and optimizing gas and nuclear assets

12

Page 13: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Advantages of “Renewable Plus” Product

• Higher value to customer– Lower reserve margin costs– Lower transmission costs– Lower ancillary services costs– Lower wind integration costs– Lower integrated energy costs– Lower risk

• Both the “renewable plus” optimization achieves higher PPAs• Higher probability to get transmission capacity faster• Increases value of wind projects and gas/CAES plant• Improves wind sales by bundling with value added services• Attracts additional buyers• Most attractive to utilities rather than pure retail energy providers (REPS)• Results in market dominance

Page 14: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Optimization

The optimization uses a multi-year mixed integer programming algorithm to minimize costs over the planning horizon, subject to customer demand, security and other constraints, and customer ancillary service procurement requirements.

14

Page 15: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Renewable Plus Planning Process

Physical ModelingCloud

Computing

Logical Modeling

LinearProgram

Conceptual

Modeling

Spreadsheet

15

IncreasingModelComplexity

Page 16: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

National Labs

Research 1Universities

Other Key Univ/Colleges

DOD

RenewableEnergyProject Area

Modular NuclearReactor

Page 17: Wind/Gas Cooptimization

Copyright © Tri Modal 2010

Summary

• Configurable “Renewable Plus” product is the key to the next generation of renewable generators

• Initial market feedback is very positive from potential partners• Renewable Plus business model will be anchored by Consortium Lead• Powerful customer led consortiums will ensure Consortium Lead have the

correct US partners in order to succeed and gain market dominance