Williams V

download Williams V

of 2

Transcript of Williams V

  • 7/24/2019 Williams V

    1/2

    WILLIAMS V. PENNSYLVANIA, No. 15-5040

    Cert. granted Oct. 1, 2015

    Argument: Feb. 29, 2016

    The Court agreed to hearWilliams v. Pennsylvania, a case challenging former PennsylvaniaSupreme Court Chief Justice Ronald Castille's participation in an appeal of a case that had been

    tried in Philadelphia while Castille was the city's district attorney. Terrance Williams (pictured) was

    convicted and sentenced to death in Philadelphia in 1984 for the murder of a man prosecutors had

    described to the jury as "a kind man [who had] offered [Williams] a ride home." Williams was 18 at

    the time of the murder. His death sentence wasreverseddays before his scheduled execution in

    2012 because prosecutors under Castille's tenure had withheld information that the victim, a church

    deacon, had sexually abused teenagers he had met through his church and that the trial prosecutor

    knew that the victim had sexually abused Williams. In 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

    reinstated Williams' death sentence. Williams' lawyers asked Castille to recuse himself from the

    case, saying he had "personally approved the decision to pursue capital punishment" againstWilliams, continued to head the office when it defended the death verdict on appeal, and, in his

    electoral campaign for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, had touted "the number of defendants he

    had 'sent' to death row, including [Williams]." Castille denied the motion for recusal and authored a

    concurring opinion that criticized Williams' lawyers and the judge who had ruled in Williams' favor.

    The U.S. Supreme Court will take up the question of whether Castille's failure to recuse himself

    violated Williams' rights, and whether it matters that Castille did not cast the deciding vote. Marc

    Bookman, director of the Atlantic Center for Capital Representation, said Castille's participation

    created a conflict of interest: "It is his former office that is being accused of hiding evidence. He has a

    stake in protecting the office that he led at the time that all this happened." Governor Tom Wolf

    granted Williams a reprieve of his death sentence and announced amoratorium on executionsin

    Pennsylvania on February 13.

    (M. Sherman, "Justices to Review Bias Claim Against Top Pennsylvania Judge," Associated Press,

    October 1, 2015; J. Roebuck, "U.S. Supreme Court agrees to scrutinize Castille's role in death-row

    inmate's case," Philadelphia Inquirer, October 1, 2015;Williams v. Pennsylvania,Petition for Writ of

    Certiorari, June 12, 2015.)

    FOSTER v. CHATMAN, No. 14-8349

    Cert. granted May 26, 2015 as Foster v. HumphreyArgument: Nov. 2, 2015

    The Court granted cert. in the case of Timothy Foster, an African-American defendant who was

    sentenced to death by an all-white jury after Georgia prosecutors had struck every black prospective

    juror in his case. The Court will determine whether the prosecutions actions violatedBatson v.

    Kentucky, which banned the practice of dismissing potential jurors on the basis of race. Foster

    http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/philadelphia-judge-cites-withheld-evidence-granting-new-sentencing-trial-terrance-williamshttp://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/philadelphia-judge-cites-withheld-evidence-granting-new-sentencing-trial-terrance-williamshttp://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/node/6054http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/10/01/us/politics/ap-us-supreme-court-judicial-bias.html?smid=fb-share&_r=1http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20151002_U_S__Supreme_Court_to_hear_appeal_of_Phila__death_row_inmate.html?c=rhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20151002_U_S__Supreme_Court_to_hear_appeal_of_Phila__death_row_inmate.html?c=rhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1LFfr8Iqz_7YllDdExmMVlveDQ/viewhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1LFfr8Iqz_7YllDdExmMVlveDQ/viewhttp://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/node/6054http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/10/01/us/politics/ap-us-supreme-court-judicial-bias.html?smid=fb-share&_r=1http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20151002_U_S__Supreme_Court_to_hear_appeal_of_Phila__death_row_inmate.html?c=rhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20151002_U_S__Supreme_Court_to_hear_appeal_of_Phila__death_row_inmate.html?c=rhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1LFfr8Iqz_7YllDdExmMVlveDQ/viewhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1LFfr8Iqz_7YllDdExmMVlveDQ/viewhttp://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/philadelphia-judge-cites-withheld-evidence-granting-new-sentencing-trial-terrance-williams
  • 7/24/2019 Williams V

    2/2

    challenged the prosecutions jury strikes as racially discriminatory at the time of jury selection, but

    the trial court permitted the strikes. Nineteen years after the trial, his lawyers obtained the

    prosecutors' notes from jury selection, which contained information that contradicted the race-

    neutral explanations for the strikes that the prosecution had offered at trial.

    The notes reflect that the prosecution marked the name of each black prospective juror in green

    highlighter on four different copies of the jury list; circled the word BLACK next to the Race

    question on the juror questionnaires of five black prospective jurors; identified three black

    prospective jurors as B#1, B#2, and B#3; and ranked the black prospective jurors against each

    other in case it comes down to having to pick one of the black jurors. Prosecutors said they struck

    each of the black jurors for race-neutral reasons and did not use the highlighted list in their final

    decision. The Georgia Supreme Court upheld Foster's conviction. Foster's case will be heard by the

    U.S. Supreme Court after the new term begins in October.

    (S. Hananel, "Supreme Court will hear appeal from Georgia death row inmate over exclusion of blackjurors," Associated Press, May 26, 2015; see the prosecutors'juror listwith black jurors

    highlighted.) See alsoScotusblog's treatment of the case.

    http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/05/26/high-court-to-consider-appeal-over-exclusion-of-black-jurorshttp://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/05/26/high-court-to-consider-appeal-over-exclusion-of-black-jurorshttp://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/05/26/high-court-to-consider-appeal-over-exclusion-of-black-jurorshttp://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/images/FostervHumphreyJuryNotes.pnghttp://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/foster-v-humphrey/http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/foster-v-humphrey/http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/05/26/high-court-to-consider-appeal-over-exclusion-of-black-jurorshttp://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/05/26/high-court-to-consider-appeal-over-exclusion-of-black-jurorshttp://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/images/FostervHumphreyJuryNotes.pnghttp://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/foster-v-humphrey/