William Krenik and Anuj Batra Texas Instruments Incorporated 12500 TI Blvd., MS 8723 Dallas, Texas...
-
Upload
scott-knight -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
6
Transcript of William Krenik and Anuj Batra Texas Instruments Incorporated 12500 TI Blvd., MS 8723 Dallas, Texas...
William Krenik and Anuj Batra Texas Instruments Incorporated
12500 TI Blvd., MS 8723Dallas, Texas 75243, USA
Cognitive Radio Techniques for Wide Area Networks
Outline
1. Motivation2. Basic Concepts3. Unlicensed Wide Area Networks4. Regulation and Deployment5. Q&A
Spectrum Allocation
Top 60 U.S. Markets have ~180-200MHz licensed for cellular WAN use
The Need for Spectrum
Service Avail. Data
Rate
Eff.
Bps/Hz
Technology Spec.
Need
Voice Today ~10kbps ~0.1-0.2 TDMA 1X
UMTS Today 384kbps ~0.2-0.3 W-CDMA, QPSK ~2-4X
HSDPA 2006 ~10Mbps ~1 Scheduling, HARQ, QAM
~10X
3.9G ~2009 ~100Mbps ~3-4 OFDM, MIMO, Scheduling (small
cells, WLAN)
~20X
4G ~2015 ~1Gbps ?? Directional antennas?
???
Air Interface Technology:Advanced/adaptive modulation and codingSophisticated schedulingMIMO / directional antennas
Network Design:Use more smaller cellsUse WLAN whenever possibleSmaller cells and WLAN use high freq. bands
Open New Spectrum:Digital TV Bill in Congress nowOpen all available bands ($$$)Share idle spectrum
1. Most spectrum is idle most of the time2. Lowers costs for service providers3. Lowers costs for consumers4. Reduces regulatory burdens for FCC
How to get more throughput
Cognitive Radio
Adapted From Mitola, “Cognitive Radio for Flexible Mobile Multimedia Communications ”, IEEE Mobile Multimedia Conf., 1999, pp 3-10.
"A cognitive radio is a radio that can change its transmitter parameters based on interactions with the environment in which it operates. The majority of cognitive radios will probably be SDRs (software defined radios), but neither having software nor being field programmable are requirements of a cognitive radio."
FCC. ET docket no. 02-25. Order, May 2002
How LANs share spectrum
AccessPoint
1. “Listen” before transmitting
2. When a collision occurs:1. pick a random time to wait2. then try again
3. Take queues from Access Point on when to TX
The system is simple and depends on an abundance of spectrum and a small number possible interferers.
Radio Link range is limited to ~100 meters
A wide area network requires more sophistication:1. Must be very efficient2. Thousands of possible interferers3. Avoid collisions in high mobility network
The Hidden Node Problem
Highly sensitive handsets could be a partial answer
First users could complain:1. Ramp up their power levels 2. Cut into secondary users with objection signal3. Complain on a shared control channel4. Complain on a shared control channel before
the secondary users interfere with them
Interference Temperature
UWAN Operation
1. UE1 requests service from BTS1 over RCC2. BTS1 checks ARM for available spectrum, checks etiquette rules, updates ARM3. BTS1 directs UE1 to channel, BW, and waveform4. UE3 & UE4 arrange session over RCC5. BTS1 monitors RCC, UE3 & UE4 session is not a problem, no objection
ARM Includes: GPS Location, TX Power, Directionality, Channel, Modulation, Code, etc.
UWAN Etiquette
UWAN System Complexity
System Complexity• OFDMA is favorable air interface
Modular and flexible No CDMA related complexity
No complexity increase in air interface, data processing, etc
• Adhoc RCC control channel – est. 2-4X complexity vs 3G
• GPS or other positioning system required (Indoor positioning?)
• Peer-to-peer mode increases complexity
• Infrastructure network requires ARM access
• Overall system complexity increase is minimal, less than the 2X overall density boost gained from a wafer process node
• Flexible RF front-ends are key needed technology:• Programmable MEM filters on the front end• MEMs for automatically tuned impedance matching
Regulatory and Deployment
Regulatory
Government body can adopt industry standard
Handset and network compliance mandated
Operating licenses for BTS operators (tower restrictions)
System upgrades possible over time
Deployment
Exploits existing network infrastructure
Incremental use of new spectrum
Appears acceptable to network operators
Summary
Limited spectrum is a threat to ubiquitous wireless data service
Advances in air interface technology cannot meet the need
Most spectrum is idle most of the time
Cognitive radio can provide a very flexible solution at
reasonable complexity level
THANK YOU!