William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

29
HOW TO BUILD SOLID-STATE ELECTRICAL OVER-UNITY DEVICES REV. 2.0a William Alek INTALEK, INC. 3506-43rd. Place Highland, IN 46322 CONTACT INFO: PHONE: 219.924.2742 EMAIL: [email protected] (c) INTALEK, INC., 2002

Transcript of William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

Page 1: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

HOW TO BUILDSOLID-STATEELECTRICALOVER-UNITY

DEVICESREV. 2.0a

William Alek

INTALEK, INC.3506-43rd. Place

Highland, IN46322

CONTACT INFO:PHONE: 219.924.2742

EMAIL: [email protected]

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002

Page 2: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 2

Page 3: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 3

ABSTRACT

Electrical coil-based devices that use Free Energy orOver-Unity effects require a unique understandingwhen determining their "correct" operation.

These devices can be placed into three uniquecategories. The first category are classic coils thatuse ferromagnetic (iron alloy) core material. Thesedevices typically have a COP (Coeff icient OfPerformance) less than unity. The second categoryare coils that use ferromagnetic cores and opposingand/or orthogonal magnetic f ields applied bypermanent magnets (pms). These devices typicallyhave a COP close to, but NOT greater than unity.The third category are coils that use ferromagneticcores and/or pms in a special configuration, andhave unique operating requirements. These deviceshave a COP greater than unity.

The purpose of this paper is to present the "hidden"mechanism that is at work in these devices whichcauses them to produce excess electrical energy.

Page 4: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 4

THE DEFINITION OF COP

Coil-BasedDevice

EIN EOUT

The Coefficient Of Performance, or COP, is a unit-less number, and is expressed as a ratio of theenergy out divided by the energy in.

COP =EOUT

EIN

µoH

µoH

+

-

S

N

FERROMAGNETICDOMAIN

A ferromagnetic domain of iron alloy core materialscan be modeled as an ideal "unity-gain" solenoid.The key words here are unity-gain, meaning that thedomains are in electromagnetic equilibrium with thethermal environment. External coils can mutuallycouple to these domains, thereby increasing its'inductance, and as a consequence, its' energy.

or

SOLENOIDMODEL

THE POTENTIALDIFFERENCE ISBOUND WITHIN

THE DOMAIN

S

N

B

B

A

I

FERROMAGNETIC DOMAINS

COP =PINdt∫

∫POUTdt

THE MAGNETICAXIS CAN PIVOT

OR ROTATE

Page 5: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

ORTHOGONAL MAGNETIC FIELDS

µoHX

BY

BZ

Magnetic fields are represented as vectors. Addingorthogonal magnetic fields using permanent magnetswil l " i n c r e a s e the permeabi l i ty µ " o f t heferromagnetic core material. As a consequence, theinductance and the energy of the coil increases. Theresults are a higher COP value.

0

µoHX

BY

0

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 5

X

Y

X

Y

Z

µXYHXY

µXY > µo

LXY > LIN

INCREASING PERMEABILITY:

INCREASES INDUCTANCE:

EXY > EIN

INCREASES OUTPUT ENERGY:

µXYZ > µo

LXYZ > LIN

INCREASING PERMEABILITY:

INCREASES INDUCTANCE:

EXYZ > EIN

INCREASES OUTPUT ENERGY:

µXYZHXYZ

Page 6: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

PERFORMANCE METHODS

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 6

CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

1 Under-Unity Devices, COP << 1.00

2

3A

B

Near-Unity Devices, COP < 1.00

Over-Unity Devices, COP > 1.00

Coil/Core - Classic Devices

Coil/Core/Magnet - SmartPAK POD, POD

Coil/Core - SmartPAK ZPOD

Coil/Core/Magnet - SmartMEG, MEG, PP

Classic use of magnetic fields applied toferromagnetic (iron alloy) core materials.

Opposing/orthogonal magnetic f ieldsapplied to ferromagnetic materials.

E l e c t r o s t r i c t i o n / m a g n e t o s t r i c t i o nphenomena of ferromagnetic materials.Cool ing of fer romagnet ic mater ia l isobserved. A "negative" Carnot cycle isoccurring within the material

Full flux transfer magnetic core anomaly.This phenomena is related to the nature offlux flowing within the magnetic material.

C Coil/Core/Magnet - H. Kunel, Adams MotorA variable reluctance control of magnet in aCategory 2 Near-Unity device.

Page 7: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 7

A SYSTEM REQUIREMENT:THE "SOURCE DIPOLE"

The source dipole, defined as a forced separation ofelectric charges, serves as a "starting engine" for allthese devices. A source dipole may be a battery, acharged capacitor, or any stored-electrical medium.A C A T E G O R Y 1 U n d e r - U n i t y d e v i c e o r aCATEGORY 2 Near-Unity device will eventuallydeplete, or collapse its' source dipole over time.However, a CATEGORY 3 Over-Unity device can beconfigured to maintain, or replenish its' dipole.

TWO AND FOUR TERMINAL DEVICES

SourceDipole

SourceDipole

LoadDipole

Coil-BasedDevice

1

2

1

2

4

3

Coil-BasedDevice

EIN EOUT

EIN

EOUT

Page 8: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

DESCRIPTIONSmartPAKTM is the world's first all solid-state FREEENERGY or OVER-UNITY power managementsys tem tha t t rans fo rms amb ien t the rma lenvironmental energy to excess electrical energy.It provides a "standard" platform for experimenters,researchers, and developers to do energy-relatedpractical applications, experiments, and performexploration of the OVER-UNITY phenomena.

The theory of operation is based on the differenceof energy between magnetization/de-magnetizationcycles of ferromagnetic materials utilizing a coil/core or coil/core/magnet Head assembly. It hasbeen discovered that EXCESS energy isreleased during the de-magnetization portion of thecycle using a suitable core assembly. TheSmartPAKTM system is specially designed tomeasure, collect, and store this excess energy forlater use.

The SmartPAK T M system is controlled by aMoto ro la 68HC908GP32 mic rocon t ro l le rprogrammed to measure input/output voltages andcurrents, calculate COP, and contains softwarealgorithms for a complete "turn-key" powermanagement system. The system features a"standard" user interface, which allows the user todesign their own custom coil/core/magnet "headassemblies", and immediately test and display inreal-time its' performance.

R&D PLATFORM:THE SmartPAKTM CONTROLLER

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 8

Page 9: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

BATTERY BANK 1 BATTERY BANK 2

SHOCK CHARGINGPOWER CIRCUITRY

OUTPUTLOAD

EXTERNALSUPPLY

CONTROLLED BY68HC908GP32

MICROCONTROLLER

SO

UR

CE

BA

TTE

RY LO

AD

BA

TTE

RY

PATH "A"

PA

TH

"B

"PATH "A"

PA

TH

"B

"

CUSTOMCOIL/CORE/MAGNET

HEAD ASSEMBLY

INTERNALSUPPLY

FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM

MICROCONTROLLERINTERFACECIRCUITRY

16X2 LCD DISPLAYAND

SIX PUSHBUTTONSWITCHES

(EXTERNALLYMOUNTED)

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 9

Page 10: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 10

D13

Q7

D

G

S

C1TANTALUM D2

I_EXT

+

-

J6

J7R220.013%

I_LD_BAT C28TANTALUM

C22TANTALUMBAT1(2)EXT

UserDesigned

Head (POD)Assembly

PWM

R8

0.013%

P1

P2

SmartPAK XX10-XX Coil Driver

V_LD_BATV_EXT

+

-

-

+

NOTE: COP = Pout / Pinwhere, Pout = V_LD_BAT x I_LD_BAT Pin = V_EXT x I_EXT

NOTE:VOLTAGES AVAILABLE:12V, 24V, 36V, and 48V

ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM

Page 11: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 11

THE SmartPAK PODNEAR-UNITY DEVICE

L22.5mH

L12.5mH

MA

G1

MA

G3

S N

SN

METGLASC-CORE

+

-

-

NOTE 1:µoH: Produced by coil L1 and L2. B: Produced by magnet MAG1 - MAG4.

L1 and L2 use 50ft of 16AWG magnet wire each.C-Core: METGLAS, AMCC-500.MAG1 - 4 are NIB type magnets.

+

SN

S N

MA

G2

MA

G4

FERRITERODS

FERRITERODS

µoH

B

B

µoH

ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM

The SmartPAK POD is classified as a CATEGORY 2Near-Unity Device. The coil L1 and L2 fields aremutually coupled to the ferrite rods' magneticdomains, which are magnetized in an opposingdirection by permanent magnets.

I

I

Page 12: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

THE NEAR-UNITY MODELOF THE SmartPAK POD

SourceDipole(BAT1)

L

S1

t<0

iBAT1

S1

t ≥ 0

D1

iBAT2

+

-

LoadDipole(BAT2)

D1

iBAT2 = 0

iBAT1 = 0

v

SourceDipole(BAT1)

LoadDipole(BAT2)

With switch S1 closed, the current (iBAT1) flows fromthe source battery (BAT1) and magnetizes coil L.This action transfers or discharges energy from thesource battery (BAT1) and stores it in L.

When switch S1 opens, the voltage (vL) across thecoil L reverses (Lenz's Law) and the energy stored inL flows out as a high-current impulse (iBAT2). Energyis transferred from L to the load battery (BAT2).

L

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 12

L

+

-

vL

MAGNETIZATION PHASE OF CYCLE

DEMAGNETIZATION PHASE OF CYCLE

Page 13: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 13

The total field energy of the system is,

ESYS = EM + EC - EMUTUAL 1

where, ESYS is total field energy. EM is energy of permanent magnet (pm). EC is energy of coil. EMUTUAL is mutual energy between coil and ferromagnetic core coupled to a pm.

THE ENERGETICS OFFERROMAGNETISM

+

-

V

IC

A

S

NIM

+

-

CLASSIC TRANSFORMER ANALYSIS

LC LM

EXTERNALCOIL

PERMANENTMAGNET

POLARIZEDFERROMAGNETIC

MATERIAL

Page 14: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 14

Differentiating ESYS with respect to time is the totalinstantaneous power, PSYS or,

ESYS = PSYS 2

Because EM is conserved and does NOT change overtime,

EM = PM = LM IM IM = 0 Watts 3

Now, rewriting PSYS,

PSYS = PC - PMUTUAL 4

So,

PSYS = LC IC IC + IC2 LC - M IM IC 5

Now, of particular interest is LC of IC2 LC. For classic

CATEGORY 1 Under-Unity devices,

LC = 0 Ω 6

FLUXCOUPLING

TERM

PARAMETRICCOUPLING

TERM

PC PMUTUAL

Page 15: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 15

However, by "strategically" polarizing the ferromagneticmaterial, this increases the permeability µ, and increasesthe inductance LC. This reveals the "hidden" mechanismthat makes these CATEGORY 3 Over-Unity devices,

LC ≠ 0 Ω 7

Since the coil dissipates power, the instantaneous powerPSYS equates to,

PSYS = R IC2 + LC IC IC + IC

2 LC - M IM IC 8

Since LC has the same units as resistance Ω, thisresistance may be positive or negative depending uponthe slope of LC. For example, if LC is "engineered" to bepositive, then the power is positive, however, if LC is"engineered" to be negative, then the power is negative.

So, integrating PSYS with respect to time is the totalenergy, ESYS or,

ESYS = ∫ PSYS dt 9

In conclusion, given special operating conditions, theferromagnetic domain can serve as a "hidden" source ofenergy simply by mutually coupling it to a coil. The energyis in the form of excess electrical energy, and thedomains transforms this energy from the ambientthermal environment. This causes an observable coolingeffect in the domains.

Page 16: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 16

THE FREE ENERGY "Alek Effect"

PERMEABILITY (µ)

B-H CURVE

PE

RM

EA

BIL

ITY

and

FLU

X D

EN

SIT

Y (

B)

MAGNETIZING FORCE (H)

NORMAL VARIATION OF µ ALONG MAGNETIZATION CURVE

MODIFIED PERMEABILITY (µm)(CAUSED BY ELECTROSTRICTION /MAGNETOSTRICTION OF IRONALLOY CORE)

B-H CURVE IS SHIFTED LEFT

PE

RM

EA

BIL

ITY

and

FLU

X D

EN

SIT

Y (

B)

MAGNETIZING FORCE (H)

MODIFIED VARIATION OF µ ALONG MAGNETIZATION CURVE

EXCESS FREE ENERGYCOMPONENT DUE TOINITIAL MAGNETIZATION

Page 17: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 17

POWEROSCILLATOR

(SQUARE WAVE)

"POD" HEADASSEMBLY

UNDER TEST

10K

0.7uf

CURRENTPROBEP6042

DYNAMIC B-H LOOP TEST FIXTURE

HORIZ

VERT

SCOPE GND

Engineering LC will shift the BH curve either left or right.

Page 18: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 18

The SmartPAK ZPODOVER-UNITY DEVICE

µoH

D1

+

T11:1

T21:1

T31:1

Tn1:1

-

µoH

µoH

µoH

LPRI1

LSEC1

LPRI

n

n x LSEC

+ -

LPRI2

LSEC2

LPRI3

LSEC3

LPRIn

LSECn

ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM

SECONDARIESWIRED IN SERIES

PRIMARIES WIREDIN PARALLEL

The Smar tPAK ZPOD is cons idered to be aThompson-Plank PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE,and is classified as a CATEGORY 3A Over-UnityDevice.

Page 19: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

THE OVER-UNITY MODELOF THE SmartPAK ZPOD

SourceBattery(BAT1)

L0

S1

t<0

iBAT1

L

S1

t ≥ 0

D1

iBAT2

+

-

LoadBattery(BAT2)

D1

iBAT2 = 0

iBAT1 = 0

v

+

-

vL

SourceBattery(BAT1)

LoadBattery(BAT2)

With switch S1 closed, the current (iBAT1) flows fromthe source battery (BAT1) and magnetizes coil L0.This action transfers or discharges energy from thesource battery (BAT1) and stores it in L0.

When switch S1 opens, the voltage (vL) across thecoil L reverses (Lenz's Law) and the energy stored inL (increased permeability µ, of L0) flows out as ahigh-current impulse (iBAT2 ). Excess energy istransferred from L to the load battery (BAT2).

L0

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 19

MAGNETIZATION PHASE OF CYCLE

DEMAGNETIZATION PHASE OF CYCLE

Page 20: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 20

THE MAGNETIZATION /DEMAGNETIZATION CYCLE

µoH

+T11:1

T21:1

T31:1

Tn1:1

-

µoH

µoH

µoH

LPRI1 LSEC1

LPRI

nHIGH

VOLTAGE

+

-

LPRI2 LSEC2

LPRI3 LSEC3

LPRIn LSECn

µoH D1-

T11:1

T21:1

T31:1

Tn1:1

+

µoH

µoH

µoH

LPRI1 LSEC1

LPRI'

nn x LSEC'

-

+

LPRI2 LSEC2

LPRI3 LSEC3

LPRIn LSECn

MAGNETIZATION PHASE OF CYCLE DEMAGNETIZATION PHASE OF CYCLE

HIGHCURRENT

Excess electrical energy is released from the deviced u r i n g t h e d e m a g n e t i z a t i o n p h a s e o f amagnet izat ion/demagnet izat ion cyc le. A s aconsequence of releasing this excess electricalenergy, the device transforms it from the ambientthermal environment, thereby cooling itself.

iMAG iDEMAG

Page 21: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

SHOCK CHARGING SYSTEMBY STEFAN HARTMANN

The Shock Charging System presented by StefanHartmann is classified as a CATEGORY 3A Over-Unity Device. The excess electrical energy appearsin the secondary coil of the transformer during thedemagnet izat ion phase of a magnet izat ion/demagnetization cycle.

The magnetization phase of the cycle is initiated byclosing switch S1. The fluroescent tube functions ascurrent limiting resistor.

ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 21

Page 22: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 22

MA

GN

ET

STA

CK

2

MA

GN

ET

STA

CK

1

MA

GN

ET

STA

CK

1

S2 S1

VOUT1

VOUT2

+12V+12V

S1-A S2-B

VOUT1

VOUT2

+12VS2-A S1-B

T. BEARDEN'S MEGDESIGN

J. FLYNN'S PARALLELPATH DESIGN

BOTH DESIGNS HAVE IDENTICAL SWITCH STATES

T1 T2

S1

S2

CLOSED

OPEN

CLOSED

OPEN

COMPARISON BETWEENT. BEARDEN'S MEG AND J. FLYNN'S PP

The Flynn design has a more efficient input switchingscheme than the Bearden design.

+

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

SWITCHING CHARACTERISTICS

Page 23: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 23

THE SmartMEGOVER-UNITY DEVICE

The SmartMEG is classified as a CATEGORY 3BOver-Unity Device.

The design implements the efficient Flynn inputscheme. This devices uses the series-wired controlcoils and a double magnet stack.

Page 24: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 24

SWITCHING CHARACTERISTICS

T1 T2 T3 T4

S1

S2

CLOSED

OPEN

CLOSED

OPEN

CLOSED

OPEN

CLOSED

OPEN

S3

S4

T1 & T3 : Wait for full flux transfer.T2 & T4 : Activate output switches. Collect excess energy.

THE SmartMEG SWITCHING STATES

MA

GN

ET

STA

CK

2

MA

GN

ET

STA

CK

1

+12VS1-A S2-A

+12VS2-B S1-B

S4

VOUT2

S3

VOUT1

ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM

MA

GN

ET

STA

CK

2

MA

GN

ET

STA

CK

1

+12VS1-A S2-A

+12VS2-B S1-B

S4

VOUT2

S3

VOUT1+

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

When S3 and S4 are open, the intended secondarycoil has a voltage bounded by Faraday's Law to thetotal flux flowing through its' core. This flux is the sumtotal of the two magnet stacks flux and the controlcoils flux.

Page 25: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 25

THE Heinrich Kunel PATENT(DE3024814) January 1, 1982

The Heinr ich Kunel patent is c lassi f ied as aCATEGORY 3C Over-Unity Device, but NOT asshown in the patent.

The "correct" operation of this device appears to be acombination of the SmartMEG and the Adams Motor.The magnetization of the control coil cancels the fieldf lowing through the f lux gate. Then, reversemagnetization of the same causes flux from thecontrol coi l p lus the f lux f rom the magnet tomagnetize the core. An output delay turn-on circuitmay be required as a caveat to ensure magnet fluxtransport across the air gap. Excess energy can thenbe collected in the output coil.

Page 26: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 26

THE SmartPAK KPODOVER-UNITY DEVICE

L22.5mH

L12.5mH

MA

G1

MA

G3

S N

SN

METGLASC-CORE

+ NOTE 1:µoH: Produced by coil L1 and L2. B: Produced by magnet MAG1 - MAG4.

L1 and L2 use 50ft of 16AWG magnet wireeach.C-Core: METGLAS, AMCC-500.MAG1 - 4 are NIB type magnets.

+

SN

S N

MA

G2

MA

G4

FERRITERODS

FERRITERODS

µoH

B

B

µoH

ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM

The SmartPAK KPOD is classified as a CATEGORY3C Over-Unity Device.

The coils L3 - L6 are the flux control gates, and areoperated bidirectionally (AC). The actual operation isvery similar to the Flynn input design. Output delayturn-on is provided by switch S1. This will ensure themagnet flux is transported across the air gap.

Excess energy is collected in output coils L1 and L2.

AIR AIR

AIR AIR

ICIC

L3

L4 L5

L6+

+

+

+

S1

Page 27: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 27

THE Adams MOTOR

S1

+

-

S

N

S

N

S N

SN

S

N

MAGNETIZATION PHASE

DEMAGNETIZATION PHASE

SourceBattery(BAT1)

SourceBattery(BAT2)

D1

NOTE:S1 is closed during themagnetization phase of amagnetization / demagnetizationcycle.

ELECTRICAL DIAGRAM

The Adams Motor is are classified as a CATEGORY3C Over-Unity Device.

As the magnet approaches Top-Dead-Center (TDC),maximum influence of the magnet flux with the coil/core demagnetization phase is obtained. Hence, thecoil/core demagnetization energy is greater than themagnetization energy.

As the magnet moves past TDC, the influence of itsflux with the coil/core decreases.

DIRECTIONOF ROTATION

I

TDC

Page 28: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 28

FUTURE RESEARCH

GRAVITONICS

I s a sc ien t i f i c d i sc ip l i ne t ha t i nves t i ga tesferromagnetic-based methods and devices thatcontrol or influence gravity.

The latest Russian research shows a correlationbetween magnetostriction and gravity.

Develop the Gravito-Ferromagnetic Space Drive.

THERMOFERROMAGNETICS

I s a sc ien t i f i c d i sc ip l i ne t ha t i nves t i ga tesferromagnetic-based methods and devices thatc o n t r o l o r i n f l u e n c e t h e a m b i e n t t h e r m a lenvironment.

The latest Russian research shows a correlationbetween magnetostriction and the ambient thermalenvironment.

Page 29: William Alek - How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices

REFERENCESNicolas Zaev, "Inductive Conversion of Heat Environmental Energy to Electrical Energy",1999.

Nicolas Zaev, "Fuel-less Energetics", 1999.

William Alek, "The Motionless Battery Shock Charger", 2001.

Jean-Louis Naudin, "The Parametric Power Conversion", 1997.

Leon Dragone, "Energetics of Ferromagnetism", 1989.

William Alek, "Analysis of Leon Dragone's, Energetics of Ferromagnetism", 2002.

Spartak and Oleg Poliakov, "Gravitonics is Electronics of the 21st Century", 2000.

Hayt & Kemmerly, "Engineering Circuit Analysis", McGraw Hill, 1993.

Col. William McLyman, "Transformer and Inductor Design Handbook", Marcel Dekker, 1988.

Technical Marketing Staff of Gates Energy Products, Inc., "Rechargeable Batteries,Applications Handbook", Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992.

Del Toro, "Electromechanical Devices for Energy Conversion and Control Systems", 1968.

Halliday & Resnick, "Physics Part II", 1960, 1962

Pressman, "Switching Power Supply Design", 1998.

William H. Clark, "Pulsed Current Battery Charging Method and Apparatus", US Patent3,963,976, June 15, 1976.

Paul Meretsky, Amiran Carmon, "Inductive Device Having Orthogonal Windings", US Patent4,210,859, July 1, 1980.

H. Kunel, "Procedures and Devices for Energy Production", DE3024814, Jan. 28, 1982.

H. Aspden and R. Adams, "Electrical Motor-Generator", GB2282708, Sept. 30, 1993.

T. Bearden and co., "Motionless Electromagnetic Generator", US Patent 6,362,718, Mar. 26,2002.

C. Flynn, "Methods for Controlling the Path of Magnetic Flux from a Permanent Magnet andDevices Incorporating the Same", US Patent 6,246,561, June 12, 2001.

Tim Harwood's Over-Unity CD Motor, http://www.geocities.com/theadamsmotor/cdmotor.html.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

(c) INTALEK, INC., 2002 29