William A. Goddard, III, [email protected] 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

85
© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reserved Ch120a-Goddard-L19 Ch120a- Goddard- 1 Nature of the Chemical Bond with applications to catalysis, materials science, nanotechnology, surface science, bioinorganic chemistry, and energy William A. Goddard, III, [email protected] 316 Beckman Institute, x3093 Charles and Mary Ferkel Professor of Chemistry, Materials Science, and Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology Teaching Assistants: Caitlin Scott < [email protected] > Hai Xiao [email protected] ; Fan Liu Lecture 13 February 1, 2011 Pd and Pt, MH + bonding, metathesis Course number: Ch120a Hours: 2-3pm Monday, Wednesday, Friday

description

Lecture 13 February 1, 2011 Pd and Pt, MH + bonding, metathesis. Nature of the Chemical Bond with applications to catalysis, materials science, nanotechnology, surface science, bioinorganic chemistry, and energy. Course number: Ch120a Hours: 2-3pm Monday, Wednesday, Friday. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of William A. Goddard, III, [email protected] 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

Page 1: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 Ch120a-Goddard-

L01

1

Nature of the Chemical Bond with applications to catalysis, materials

science, nanotechnology, surface science, bioinorganic chemistry, and energy

William A. Goddard, III, [email protected] Beckman Institute, x3093

Charles and Mary Ferkel Professor of Chemistry, Materials Science, and Applied Physics,

California Institute of Technology

Teaching Assistants: Caitlin Scott <[email protected]>Hai Xiao [email protected]; Fan Liu <[email protected]>

Lecture 13 February 1, 2011Pd and Pt, MH+ bonding, metathesis

Course number: Ch120aHours: 2-3pm Monday, Wednesday, Friday

Page 2: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 2

Last time

Page 3: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 3

Compare chemistry of column 10

Page 4: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 4

Ground state of group 10 column

Pt: (5d)9(6s)1 3D ground statePt: (5d)10(6s)0 1S excited state at 11.0 kcal/molPt: (5d)8(6s)2 3F excited state at 14.7 kcal/mol

Pd: (5d)10(6s)0 1S ground statePd: (5d)9(6s)1 3D excited state at 21.9 kcal/molPd: (5d)8(6s)2 3F excited state at 77.9 kcal/mol

Ni: (5d)8(6s)2 3F ground stateNi: (5d)9(6s)1 3D excited state at 0.7 kcal/molNi: (5d)10(6s)0 1S excited state at 40.0 kcal/mol

Page 5: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 5

Salient differences between Ni, Pd, Pt

Ni Pd Pt

4s more stable than 3d 5s much less stable than 4d 6s, 5d similar stability3d much smaller than 4s(No 3d Pauli orthogonality)Huge e-e repulsion for d10

4d similar size to 5s (orthog to 3d,4s

Differential shielding favors n=4 over n=5,

stabilize 4d over 5s d10

2nd row (Pd): 4d much more stable than 5s Pd d10 ground state

3rd row (Pt): 5d and 6s comparable stability Pt d9s1 ground state

Relativistic effects of 1s huge decreased KE contraction stabilize and contract all ns destabilize and expand nd

Page 6: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 6

Mysteries from experiments on oxidative addition and reductive elimination of CH and CC bonds on Pd and Pt

Why is CC coupling so much harder than CH coupling?

Page 7: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 7

Step 1: examine GVB orbitals for (PH3)2Pt(CH3)

Page 8: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 8

Analysis of GVB wavefunction

Page 9: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 9

Alternative models for Pt centers

Page 10: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 10

Page 11: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 11

energetics

Not agree with experiment

Page 12: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 12

Possible explanation: kinetics

Page 13: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 13

Consider reductive elimination of HH, CH and CC from Pd

Conclusion: HH no barrier

CH modest barrierCC large barrier

Page 14: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 14

Consider oxidative addition of HH, CH, and CC to Pt

Conclusion: HH no barrier

CH modest barrierCC large barrier

Page 15: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 15

Summary of barriers

But why?

This explains why CC coupling not occur for Pt while CH and HHcoupling is fast

Page 16: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 16

How estimate the size of barriers (without calculations)

Page 17: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 17

Examine HH coupling at transition state

Can simultaneously get good overlap of H with Pd sd hybrid and with the other H

Thus get resonance stabilization of TS low barrier

Page 18: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 18

Examine CC coupling at transition state

Can orient the CH3 to obtain good overlap with Pd sd hybrid OR can orient the CH3 to obtain get good overlap with the other CH3

But CANNOT DO BOTH SIMULTANEOUSLY, thus do NOT get resonance stabilization of TS high barier

Page 19: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 19

Examine CH coupling at transition state

H can overlap both CH3 and Pd

sd hybrid simultaneously but CH3 cannot

thus get ~ ½ resonance

stabilization of TS

Page 20: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 20

Now we understand Pt chemistry

But what about Pd?

Why are Pt and Pd so dramatically different

Page 21: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 21

new

Page 22: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 22

Pt goes from s1d9 to d10 upon reductive eliminationthus product stability is DECREASED by 12 kcal/mol

Using numbers from QM

Page 23: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 23

Ground state configurations for column 10

Ni Pd Pt

Page 24: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 24

Pd goes from s1d9 to d10 upon reductive eliminationthus product stability is INCREASED by 20 kcal/mol

Using numbers from QM

Pd and Pt would be ~ same

Page 25: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 25

Thus reductive elimination from Pd is stabilized by an extra 32 kcal/mol than for Pt due to the ATOMIC nature of the states

The dramatic stabilization of the product by 35 kcal/mol reduces the barrier from ~ 41 (Pt) to ~ 10 (Pd)

This converts a forbidden reaction to allowed

Page 26: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 26

Summary energetics

Conclusion the atomic character of the metal can

control the chemistry

Page 27: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 27

Examine bonding to all three rows of transition metals

Use MH+ as model because a positive metal is more representative of organometallic and inorganic complexes

M0 usually has two electrons in ns orbitals or else one

M+ generally has one electron in ns orbitals or else zero

M2+ never has electrons in ns orbitals

Page 28: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 28

Ground states of neutral atoms

Sc (4s)2(3d)Ti (4s)2(3d)2V (4s)2(3d)3Cr (4s)1(3d)5Mn (4s)2(3d)5Fe (4s)2(3d)6Co (4s)2(3d)7Ni (4s)2(3d)8Cu (4s)1(3d)10

Sc++ (3d)1Ti ++ (3d)2V ++ (3d)3 Cr ++ (3d)4Mn ++ (3d)5Fe ++ (3d)6 Co ++ (3d)7 Ni ++ (3d)8 Cu++ (3d)10

Sc+ (4s)1(3d)1Ti+ (4s)1(3d)2V+ (4s)0(3d)3Cr+ (4s)0(3d)5Mn+ (4s)1(3d)5Fe+ (4s)1(3d)6Co+ (4s)0(3d)7Ni+ (4s)0(3d)8Cu+ (4s)0(3d)10

Page 29: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 29

Bond energies MH+

Cr

Mo

Re

Ag

Cu

Au

Page 30: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 30

Exchange energies:

Get 6*5/2=15 exchange terms5Ksd + 10 KddResponsible for Hund’s rule

Ksd KddMn+ 4.8 19.8 Tc+ 8.3 15.3Re+ 11.9 14.1

kcal/mol

Form bond to H, must lose half the exchange stabilization for the orbital bonded to the H

A[(d1a)(d2a)(d3a)(d4a)(d5a)(sa)]

Mn+: s1d5

For high spin (S=3)

A{(d1a)(d2a)(d3a)(d4a)(sdba)[(sdb)H+H(sdb)]( -ab ba)}sdb is a half the time and b half the time

Page 31: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 31

Ground state of M+ metalsMostly s1dn-1Exceptions:1st row: V, Cr-Cu2nd row: Nb-Mo, Ru-Ag3rd row: La, Pt, Au

Page 32: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 32

Size of atomic orbitals, M+

Valence s similar for all three rows,5s biggest

Big decrease from La(an 57) to Hf(an 72

Valence d very small for 3d

Page 33: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 33

Charge transfer in MH+ bondselectropositive

electronegative

1st row all electropositive

2nd row: Ru,Rh,Pd

electronegative3rd row:

Pt, Au, Hg electronegative

Page 34: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 34

Page 35: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 35

Page 36: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 36

Page 37: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 37

Page 38: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 38

1st row

Page 39: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 39

Page 40: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 40Schilling

Page 41: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 41

Steigerwald

Page 42: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 42

Page 43: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 43

Page 44: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 44

2nd row

Page 45: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 45

Page 46: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 46

Page 47: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 47

Page 48: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 48

Page 49: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 49

Page 50: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 50

Page 51: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 51

3rd row

Page 52: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 52

Page 53: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 53

Page 54: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 54

Page 55: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 55

Page 56: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 56

Page 57: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 57

Page 58: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 58

Page 59: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 59

Page 60: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 60

Page 61: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 61

Page 62: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 62

Page 63: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 63

Page 64: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 64

Physics behind Woodward-Hoffman Rules

For a reaction to be allowed, the number of bonds must be conserved. Consider H2 + D2

2 bonds TS ? bonds 2 bonds

Bonding2 elect

nonbonding1 elect

antibonding0 elect

Have 3 electrons, 3 MO’s

Have 1 bond. Next consider 4th atom, can we get 2 bonds?

To be allowed must have 2 bonds at TSHow assess number of bonds at the TS. What do the dots mean? Consider first the fragment

Page 65: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 65

Can we have 2s + 2s reactions for transition metals?

2s + 2s forbidden for organics

X

Cl2Ti Cl2Ti Cl2Ti? ?

2s + 2s forbidden for organometallics?

Cl2Ti Cl2Ti Cl2TiMe

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Page 66: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 66

Physics behind Woodward-Hoffman Rules

Bonding2 elect

nonbonding1 elect

antibonding0 elect

Have 1 bond. Question, when add 4th atom, can we get 2 bonds?

Can it bond to the nonbonding orbital?

Answer: NO. The two orbitals are orthogonal in the TS, thus the reaction is forbidden

Page 67: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 67

Now consider a TM case: Cl2TiH+ + D2

Orbitals of reactants

GVB orbitals of TiH bond for Cl2TiH+

GVB orbitals of D2

Page 68: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 68

Is Cl2TiH+ + D2 Cl2TiD+ + HD allowed?

Bonding2 elect

nonbonding1 elect

antibonding0 elect

when add Ti 4th atom, can we get 2 bonds?

Answer: YES. The two orbitals can have high overlap at the TS orthogonal in the TS, thus the reaction is allowed

Now the bonding orbital on Ti is d-like. Thus at TS have

Page 69: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 69

GVB orbitals at the TS for Cl2TiH+ + D2 Cl2TiD+ + HD

Page 70: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 70

GVB orbitals for the Cl2TiD+ + HD productNote get phase change for both orbitals

Page 71: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 71

Follow the D2 bond as it

evolves into the HD bond

Page 72: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 72

Follow the TiH bond as it

evolves into the TiD bond

Page 73: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 73

Barriers small, thus allowed

Increased d character in bond smaller barrier

Page 74: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 74

Are all MH reactions with D2 allowed? No

Example: ClMn-H + D2

Here the Mn-Cl bond is very polar

Mn(4s-4pz) lobe orbital with Cl:3pz

This leaves the Mn: (3d)5(4s+4pz), S=3 state to bond to the HBut spin pairing to a d orbital would lose

4*Kdd/2+Ksd/2= (40+2.5) = 42.5 kcal/mol

whereas bonding to the (4s+4pz) orbital loses

5*Ksd/2 = 12.5 kcal/mol

As a result the H bonds to (4s+4pz), leaving a high spin d5.

Now the exchange reaction is forbidden

Page 75: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19

Thus ClMn-H bond is sp-likeClMnH

Mn (4s)2(3d)5

The Cl pulls off 1 e from Mn, leaving a d5s1 configurationH bonds to 4s because of exchange stabilization of d5

Mn-H bond character0.07 Mnd+0.71Mnsp+1.20H

This cannot overlap the antisymmetric orbital delocalized over the three H atoms in the TSAs a result at the Transition state the MnH bond has the character of H3

- with both electrons on the H3.

This leads to a high barrier, ~45 kcal/mol

Page 76: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2011 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L19 76

Show reaction for ClMnH + D2

Show example reactions

Page 77: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 77

Olefin Metathesis

Diego Benitez, Ekaterina Tkatchouk, Sheng Ding

2+2 metal-carbocycle reactions

Page 78: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 78

Mechanism: actual catalyst is a metal-alkylidene

R1 R1 R2 R2+

R1 R22

M

R2

R1 R3

M

R2

R1 R3

M

R2

R1 R3

Catalytically make and break double bonds!

OLEFIN METATHESIS

Page 79: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 79

Ru Olefin Metathesis Basics

Page 80: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 80

Common Olefin Metathesis Catalysts

Page 81: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 81

Applications of the olefin metathesis reaction

Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18-29

http://www.pslc.ws/macrog/pdcpd.htmbulletproof resin

Small scale synthesisto industrial polymers

Page 82: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 82

History of Olefin Metathesis Catalysts

Page 83: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

Ch120-L20 13/11/02GODDARD 83

Well-defined metathesis catalysts

RuPCy3

Ph

Cl

ClNN MesMes

RuPCy3

Ph

Cl

ClNN MesMes

R R

R=H, Ph, or -CH2-(CH2)2-CH2-

R R

R=H, Cl

NMo

PhCH3

CH3(F3C)2MeCO(F3C)2MeCO

iPr iPrRuPCy3

PCy3

Ph

Cl

Cl

1 2 3 4Schrock 1991alkoxy imido molybdenum complexa

Bazan, G. C.; Oskam, J. H.; Cho, H. N.; Park, L. Y.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6899-6907

Grubbs 1991 ruthenium

benzylidene complexb

Grubbs 19991,3-dimesityl-imidazole-2-ylidenes

P(Cy)3 mixed ligand system”c

Scholl, M.; Trnka, T. M.; Morgan, J. P.; Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2247-2250.

Wagener, K. B.; Boncella, J. M.; Nel, J. G. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 2649-2657

Page 84: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 84

Examples of Common Second Generation Grubbs-typeMetathesis Catalysts and Mechanism Overview

Ru

NNMes MesCl

Cl PhPCy3

Ru

NNMes MesCl

Cl PhPy

Ru

NNMes MesCl

ClO

i-Pr

slow initiating catalyst ultra-fast-initiating catalystfast-initiating catalyst

RuCl

IMesCl

RLPh

IMes

Ru

LCl

ClInitiation

Ru

Cl

IMesCl

Cl

IMesClR

R2

RuR3

RuCl

IMesCl

R1

PropagationR2R3

R3

R2

R1

+

Examples 2nd Generation Grubbs Metathesis Catalysts

General mechanism of Metathesis

Page 85: William A. Goddard, III,  wag@wag.caltech.edu 316 Beckman Institute, x3093

© copyright 2010 William A. Goddard III, all rights reservedCh120a-Goddard-L21 85

Schrock and Grubbs catalysts make olefin metathesis practical

Schrock catalyst –very active, but destroysmany functional groups

Grubbs catalyst –very stable, high functionalgroup tolerance, but not asreactive as Schrock

Catalysts contain many years of evolutionary improvements