Why the Outfall? - MWRA · n Engineering and modeling ... surface plume. OMSAP Public Meeting...
-
Upload
duongkhanh -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Why the Outfall? - MWRA · n Engineering and modeling ... surface plume. OMSAP Public Meeting...
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Protecting the Harbor/Bays Ecosystem
1. Cleaner effluent through source reduction andsecondary treatment
2. Dilution
3. Monitoring and Contingency Planning
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Siting
Siting process beganin 1986. Minimumrequirements wereset by EPA:
n Initial dilution of 50n More than one tidal
cycle away fromshoreline
n Avoid sensitive andunique resources
n Harbor site ruled out
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Siting Process: Siting Criteria
Siting criteria developed by Facilities PlanningCitizens Advisory Committee:
n Attain compliance with state and federal waterquality criteria
n Protection of commercial on-the-water activitiesn Maintenance and enhancement of aestheticsn Avoidance of areas of important habitat
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Siting Process: Technical Analysis
7 potential sites evaluated independently by EPAand MWRA: Broad Sound to a location 10 milesoffshore
n Siting studies in 1987 and 1988n Engineering and modelingn 2 years of oceanographic sampling including biological,
physical and chemical studies
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Siting Process: Site Selection
After extensive regulatoryreview and publiccomment, 9.5-mile siteselected. FEISdetermined that:
n Water depth andcurrent patternspromote effectivedilution
n Least likely to affectsensitive resources
n Feasible to construct
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Design: Tunnel and Risers
n 380 feet drop shaft from plantn 9.5 mile tunnel, bored through bedrockn Diffuser system (55 risers each with 8 ports) along final
1.25 miles provide maximum dilution
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Design: Scale Model
n Roberts scalemodel of outfalland diffusersystem used totest different portconfigurations.
n 8 ports gave mosteffective, rapiddispersion.
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Design: Diffuser Head
Diffuser head ready for installation
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Dilution: Harbor Location
n Average depth about 30 feetn Available dilution is about 14 to 1.n With onshore winds, effluent can reach the
shoreline.n Effluent plumes reach the surface and are visible.n Effluent is flushed to Massachusetts Bay in a
surface plume.
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Dilution: Model Harbor Outfalls
USGS-Hydroqualmodel
n 77 square miles<200-fold
n Lower dilutioncontours extendalong shorelinesouth of Boston
n Parts of CCBshoreline 600-1000.
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Dilution: Bay Outfall
n Average depth about 100 feetn 1.25 mile diffuser system provides effective
dispersion.n Available dilution is about 150 to 1.n Effluent is more than one tidal cycle away from
shoreline.n Circulation is greater and more variable than in
Harbor, providing better mixing.
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Dilution: Model Bay Outfall
USGS-Hydroqualmodel
n 3 square miles<200
n Harbor and SouthShore 400-600.
n Most of MB andall of CCB >1000
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Bay Outfall: Mixing in Winter
n Water column is well-mixed.
n Freshwater effluentplume rises rapidly,and mixes to samedensity as seawaterwithin a few tens ofmeters.
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Bay Outfall:Mixing and Stratification in Summer
n Water columnstratification trapseffluent below pycnocline(about 15m below thesurface).
n Nutrients less availableto phytoplankton atsurface, where there isthe most light.
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
Outfall Benefits: Less Chlorine Use
n Chlorine disinfection necessary to protect public health; minimizingchlorine use is environmentally beneficial.
n Disinfection effectiveness, K, depends on concentration of chlorine, C,and duration of exposure, t :
K = Ct.n Length of outfall increases t, allowing less chlorine use.
Present Outfall
Contact time ~45 minutes 4-15 hours(10 hours average)
Approx. targetchlorine residual 1.0-3.0 mg/l 0.5-1.0 mg/l
Annual chlorine use 4.6 MG 1.38 MG
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
CSO/System Master Plan andWet Weather Hydraulic Flow Capacity
n Size of treatment plant, interceptors,pumping, CSO facilities integrated inMWRA’s CSO/System Master Plan.
n Maximum plant pumping (and new outfall)capacity = 1270 MGD.
n New outfall is necessary to achieve levels ofCSO control in Plan.
OMSAP Public MeetingSeptember 1999
CSO/System Master Plan andWet Weather Hydraulic Flow Capacity
n Two existing major Harbor outfalls maximumcapacity = 400 MGD. (MWRA average = 370MGD)
n Flows >400 MGD activate two shorelineemergency outfalls in Winthrop Bay; total capacity~1000 MGD.
n At flows >1000 MGD headworks must restrictflow, increasing combined sewer overflows.
n New outfall will provide hydraulic capacity of 1270MGD.