Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

33
Part 1: I convince you there is a problem Part 2: I argue that solutions are possible Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security Markus Jakobsson, PayPal

description

Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security. Part 1: I convince you there is a problem Part 2: I argue that solutions are possible. Markus Jakobsson, PayPal. We do have a problem. Social ( ab)use. Power limitations. Lack of crypto. Our own inertia. Limited user interfaces. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Page 1: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Part 1: I convince you there is a problemPart 2: I argue that solutions are possible

Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Markus Jakobsson, PayPal

Page 2: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

We do have a problem

Lack of crypto

Social (ab)use

Power limitations

Limited user interfacesOur own inertia

Page 3: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Imagine: 30 mins after leaving home…

Page 4: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Some UI problems

Your password must have at least one digit and at least one special character, and …

Please enter the nameof your maternal grandma’s best friend’s first pet

Page 5: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Password Entry Pain

5

1 2 3 4 5

Short battery life

Slow Web connection

Lack of coverage

Poor voice quality

Small screen

size

Difficulty customizing

settings

Difficulty entering

passwords

Page 6: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Password Entry Pain

6

x 2.5

(cumulative distribution)

Page 7: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Translation to reality-speak

“People hate passwords”

“Accept PINs; cache credentials;add remember-me features. Worry about the consequences when they surface.”

Page 8: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Another reaction

“Right now, use signatures for mobile, too. Worry about the consequences when they surface.”

“Mobile malware is here”

Page 9: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

How it should be

“Develop secure and less annoying authentication/anti-virus methods.”

Page 10: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

So let’s look at what to do!Part 1: Power

Page 11: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Let’s talk about power!

• Software-based attestation: Verify no active malware before running sensitive routine

• This way, only occasional verification

connectionrequest

Ok?

Verify

Ok!

Some more details at www.fatskunk.com + contact me

Page 12: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Let’s talk about power!

• Software-based attestation: Verify no active malware before running sensitive routine

• This way, only occasional verification

connectionrequest

connectionmalware scan (flash)vote caststorage decryptionlogin process

Some more details at www.fatskunk.com + contact me

Page 13: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

13

monolithkernel

cache

RAM

1. Swap out all programs (malware may refuse)

How?

Page 14: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

14

monolithkernel

cache

1. Swap out all programs (malware may refuse)

2. Overwrite all “free” RAM pseudo-random content(malware refuses again)

How?

Page 15: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

15

monolithkernel

cache

1. Swap out all programs (malware may refuse)

2. Overwrite all “free” RAMpseudo-random content(malware refuses again)

How?

Page 16: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

16

monolithkernel

cache

1. Swap out all programs (malware may refuse)

2. Overwrite all “free” RAM pseudo-random content(malware refuses again)

3. Compute keyed digest of all RAM(access order unknown a priori)

How?

Page 17: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

17

monolithkernel

cache

1. Swap out all programs (malware may refuse)

2. Overwrite all “free” RAM pseudo-random content(malware refuses again)

3. Compute keyed digest of all RAM(access order unknown a priori)

How?

Page 18: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

monolithkernel

cache

RAM

1. Swap out all programs (malware may refuse)

2. Overwrite all “free” RAM pseudo-random content(malware refuses again)

3. Compute keyed digest of all RAM(access order unknown a priori)

External verifier provides this

How?

Page 19: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

monolithkernel

cache

RAM

1. Swap out all programs (malware may refuse)

2. Overwrite all “free” RAM pseudo-random content(malware refuses again)

3. Compute keyed digest of all RAM(access order unknown a priori)

External verifier will time this(and check result of computation)

How?

Page 20: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Part 2: UIs

Page 21: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

21

Smaller Keyboard: Slower = Less Secure

Page 22: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

22

Why Not Use Error Correction?

Page 23: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

23

A “Fastword”: Several Dictionary Words(Three, For Example)

Enter fastword:

Paper & very crude demo at www.fastword.me

Page 24: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

24

Password average (18 bits)

2 out of 3Fastword

3 out of 3Fastword

Fastwords: How Secure?

(cumulative distribution)

Page 25: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

25

Fastwords: How Fast?

(cumulative distribution)

Page 26: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Part 3: our inertia

Page 27: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Some issues we all know about

• Pushing back on weak credentials• Dealing with special cases (such as resets)• Discouraging credential reuse• Getting to the bottom with 419, phishing, etc.• Privacy issues – sometimes at odds with security

(Of course, these are not pure mobile problems, but Ibelieve that they will be aggravated as the worldturns mobile.)

(but choose to ignore)

Page 28: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

The problem of weak credentials

Q. What is the greatest problem?

A. Identifying when it happens.

Relevant paper at www.fastword.me

Page 29: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

ResetsEasy to guess or data mine, yet hard to remember?– What was the brand/color of your first car?– What is your mother’s maiden name?– What address did you grow up at?– What is the brand of your refrigerator?– What is your favorite restaurant?

Hard to use on a handset?

And a big one: Slow registration!

Page 30: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Avoiding credential reuse

Q. Why do people reuse passwords?

A. Because they can!

Relevant paper at visual-blue-moon-authentication.com

Page 31: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Limiting phishing

A phishing attack is successful when:1. Phisher spoofs trusted site, and 2. User reaction to (1) results in leak

of credential.

Page 32: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Privacy intrusion or not?

Keyboard biometrics?Calling behavior? Location?

Face recognition?

Page 33: Why Mobile Security is not Like Traditional Security

Disclaimer• These are my opinions. Not PayPal’s.• I own some of these things. I am not impartial.• Some of this is published. Other stuff is not.

Contact me for more information.

More information atwww.markus-jakobsson.com

www.mobile-blue-moon-authentication.comwww.fatskunk.comwww.fastword.me