Why do we need to change?

64

description

Strengthening Philippine Education through RSEC 2010 & Understanding by Design (UBD) Understanding by Design: Comparing What’s Changing in the DepEd Lesson Plan. Why do we need to change?. According to DepEd … “ Society is changing , and our students need to keep up” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Why do we need to change?

Page 1: Why do we need to change?
Page 2: Why do we need to change?

According to DepEd…1. “Society is changing, and our students

need to keep up”2. “National achievement scores indicate

an ‘Educational Crisis’ in the Philippines”

2010 Secondary Education Curriculum Guide in English. March 26, 2010. 2010 National Secondary Education Curriculum ('UbD curriculum'). http://eduphil.org/forum/ubd-rbec-nsec-bec-psslc-pelc-etc-materials-t-2927.html

Page 3: Why do we need to change?

MEETING THE DEMANDS OF21ST CENTURY EDUCATION

Page 4: Why do we need to change?

Amid success and quantum leaps made by mankind through many generations, have we really empowered the youth of today with the ability to cope with the challenges which daily life brings to them?

Page 5: Why do we need to change?

Reflective Thinking Activity:

1.What does the experience of Death Valley tell us teachers?

2.What skills are necessary for students to be able to cope with global changes?

3.What do employers demand from our graduates?

4.What can we do to make students’ learning truly functional and meaningful?

Page 6: Why do we need to change?

The seven survival skills advocated by Tony Wagner in his book, The Global Achievement Gap:

1.Critical Thinking and Problem Solving 2. Collaboration across Networks and Leading by Influence 3. Agility and Adaptability 4. Initiative and Entrepreneurialism 5. Effective Oral and Written Communication 6. Accessing and Analyzing Information 7. Curiosity and Imagination

Page 7: Why do we need to change?

The Seven Survival Skills

Page 8: Why do we need to change?

Critical thinking and problem solving

An essential component of this is asking good questions. The education system (as it is in much of the world) is about getting the right answer. People in their lives and in work need to deal with vast amounts of information and a key skill it to figure out what's important and what's not, what's accurate and what's not. This is a key part of being a critical thinker.

Schools need to start teaching critical thinking as soon as children are capable of abstract thinking, so it's not just a secondary school thing; students need years of practice developing their thinking skills in order to apply it to university study, work and life effectively

Page 9: Why do we need to change?

Collaboration across networks and leading by influence

In the old world of school, "students are accustomed to having teachers tell them what to do. And students almost never work in teams." In the new world of work people work in teams (often virtual teams that work together through video conferencing and email) and have to make their own decisions: "corporations are increasingly being organized around a very different kind of authority and accountability structure - one that is less hierarchical and more reciprocal and relational.”

Page 10: Why do we need to change?

Agility and adaptability

"Our system of schooling promotes the idea that there are right answers, and that you get rewarded if you get the right answer." But in the real world of work and life, the right answers aren't there and things change so people need to adapt and be able to deal with disruption.Most children are naturally agile and adaptable. They quickly take to new physical skills like walking and riding bikes. Thrust a new piece of technology in their hands and they will immediately explore and play with it; children have adapted readily to the Internet revolution. Move home and most children will soon fit into the new neighborhood. They have to deal with changing schools and every year they get a bunch of new teachers. Schools seem hell-bent on destroying this life skill

Page 11: Why do we need to change?

Initiative and entrepreneuralism

The world needs proactive people, self-starters. It involves creativity and creating your own answers and solutions.

Page 12: Why do we need to change?

Effective oral and written communication

Everyone would agree with this, but what surprises Wagner, himself a former English teacher, is the demand that employers have for "clear and concise" writing that has "focus, energy and passion." Wagner points out that English teachers spend a great deal of time focussing on grammar, punctuation and spelling, and formulaic styles of writing, but these are driven again by the demands of testing (which seek objective and therefore correct answers). What schools emphasise less is writing that has focus, energy and passion

Page 13: Why do we need to change?

Accessing and analyzing information

People have to deal with an astronomical amount of information in their lives and work. It needs to be found, and evaluated. Important too is the ability to use information from a variety of sources: web pages, magazines, podcasts, TV, face to face interviews and discussions, surveys, books. Also key is the ability to synthesize information (which Daniel Pink and others place as a distinct skill in itself - right brain thinking rather than analysis which is left brain). This is simply reading for the 21st century.

Curiosity and imagination

This is also natural for children and, like adaptability, it is one that schools aim to destroy; unlike adaptability, they generally succeed, usually through a diet of teaching that bores and demotivates them.

Page 14: Why do we need to change?

Thornburg (Part II): “The New Basics”

I. Digital-Age Literacy:

Scientific, mathematical, and technological literacies ; visual and information literacies , and cultural literacy and global awareness

II. Inventive Thinking:

Adaptability/ability to handle complexity; curiosity, creativity, and risk-taking; and higher-order thinking and sound reasoning

III. Effective Communication:

Teaming, collaboration, and interpersonal skills; personal and social responsibility; interactive communication skills

IV. High Productivity:Ability to prioritize, plan, and manage for results; effective use of real-world tools; and ability to create relevant, high-quality products

Page 15: Why do we need to change?

Lifelong learning

Page 16: Why do we need to change?

Our students are facing many emerging issues such as global warming, famine, poverty, health issues, a global population explosion and other environmental and social issues. These issues lead to a need for students to be able to communicate, function and create change personally, socially, economically and politically on local, national and global levels.

Page 17: Why do we need to change?

TheRefined Secondary Education Curriculum (RSEC) andTeaching and Learning with Understanding by Design (UbD)

Page 18: Why do we need to change?

Basic Rationale for Unit Planning using UbD

1.Overcoming the prevalence of “Aimless Activity” and “Superficial Coverage”

2.Moving beyond micro-managing of teaching via discrete or fragmented lesson plans

3.A holistic or integral approach of planning where one sees the totality of learning a chapter, a unit or a smaller chunk of a broad chapter

4.A focus on big ideas and complex performance leading to understanding

Page 19: Why do we need to change?

Understanding by Design is… 1. a way of thinking about getting students to explore the most important questions and concepts in their subjects in school.

2. a framework to help students transfer knowledge and skills into novel context that require. understanding through explanation, interpretation, application, empathy, perspective, or self-knowledge.

Page 20: Why do we need to change?

What should we consider to make learning more useful and relevant?

Page 21: Why do we need to change?

Transfer of Learning

Page 22: Why do we need to change?

An individual understands a concept, skill, theory, or domain of knowledge to the extent that he or she can apply it appropriately in a new situation….Howard Gardner

Page 23: Why do we need to change?

“Transfer of learning” is:-the use of knowledge and skills (acquired in an earlier context) in a new context.

-in the form of meanings, expectations, generalizations, concepts or insights

Bigge & Shermis1992

Page 24: Why do we need to change?

What happens when no transfer of learning is done?

Page 25: Why do we need to change?

How much of what we learned in academic subjects long ago do we still find personally useful today?

Page 26: Why do we need to change?

Why are many academic subjects which are more in number turn out to be less useful than the practical arts subjects?

Page 27: Why do we need to change?

The Revised Basic Education Curriculum(RBEC 2002)An enhancement of the old General Curriculum for Elementary and High SchoolIncreased in contact time for Math, Science, English, TLE.Clustering of AP, TLE/HELE, MAPE/PEHM, Rel/Values Ed under MAKABAYANPromotes integration and thematic approach in enriching curriculum; development of Multiple Intelligences (MI);integration of values in all subjects and the use of constructivism principle of teaching in making learning more student-centered Math in HS –from spiraling back to specializationEnglish –emphasis on whole language approach which led to Communication Arts title for English subject instead of the separate Grammar and LiteratureHyperlink to RBEC

Page 28: Why do we need to change?

The Refined Secondary Education Curriculum(RSEC 2010)

The result of the continuous effort to evaluate and intensify the Philippine Secondary Curriculum

Focus is given on the design of instructional plans that promote better understanding of lessons that are slanted towards lifelong learning

The use of Backward Design Approach in planning and teaching meaningful learning experiences

DepEd will release a Curriculum Guide including the Performance Matrix that will guide schools in using UbD Approach

Hyperlink to RSEC and Matrix

Page 29: Why do we need to change?

DepEd’s Response:Adaptation of UbD in the Refined Curriculum

Page 30: Why do we need to change?

What is Understanding by

Design?

Why Understanding by

Design?

Page 31: Why do we need to change?

“Begin with the end in mind…”-Stephen Covey

Page 32: Why do we need to change?

Backward Design Approach

Page 33: Why do we need to change?

“Backward Design” focus: Clarify results and evidence of them before designing lessons.

Teaching for understanding is the goal of teaching and compatible with standards-based curricula.

UbD is a way of thinking more carefully about design, not a program.

Page 34: Why do we need to change?

A framework that synthesizes research-based best practices in curriculum, assessment, and instruction that promote the learning process.

A language that educators can use to describe and analyze the best ways to promote student understanding, rather than just knowledge/recall.

Page 35: Why do we need to change?

Thinking like an assessor, not only an activity designer, is key to effective design.

Overcoming the “twin sins” of “aimless activity” and “superficial coverage”.

The work is only “coverage” or “nice activity” unless focused on questions and big ideas, related to the Standards.

Page 36: Why do we need to change?

UbD: STAGES OF BACKWARD DESIGN

Page 37: Why do we need to change?

UbD : Stages of Backward Design

The backward design approach consists of three general stages:

Stage1. Identify Desired Results

•Goals

•What should students know, understand, and be able to do?

•What big ideas are worthy of understanding and implied in the established goals ( content standards, curriculum objectives)?

•What provocative question are worth pursuing to guide student inquiry into these big ideas?

•What enduring understanding are desired?

•What specific knowledge and skills are targeted in the goals and are needed for effective performance?

Page 38: Why do we need to change?

Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence

•Evidence of learning

•How will we know if students have achieved the desired results and the content standards?

•How will we know that students really understand the identified big ideas?

•What will we accept as evidence of proficiency?

•Think of our design in terms of the collected assessment evidence needed to document and validate that the desired results of Stage 1 have been achieved.

Page 39: Why do we need to change?

Stage 3. Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction

With identified results and appropriate evidence of understanding in mind, it is now time to finalize a plan for the learning activities .

•What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it best be taught, in light of the performance goals?

•What sequence of activity best suits the desired results?

•In planning the learning activities, we consider the WHERETO elements( described later )as guidelines. Those guidelines can be summed up in a question: How will we make learning both engaging and effective, given the goals and needed evidence?

Page 40: Why do we need to change?
Page 41: Why do we need to change?

Template with Design Questions for Teachers

Stage 2 – Assessment Evidence

Performance Tasks: •Through what authentic performance tasks will students demonstrate the desired understanding?

•By what criteria will performances of understanding be judged?

Other Evidence:•Through what other evidence ( e. g., quizzes, tests, academic prompts, observation, homework, journals) will students demonstrate achievement of the desired results?

•How will students reflect upon and self-assess their learning?

Page 42: Why do we need to change?

Template with Design Questions for Teachers

Stage 3 – Learning Plan

Learning Activities: •What learning experiences and instruction will enable students to achieve the desired results? How will the design W = Help the students know Where the unit is going and What is expected ? Help the teacher know Where the students are coming from (prior knowledge , interests)?H = Hook all students and Hold their interests?E = Equip students, help the Experience the key ideas and Explore the issues?R = Provide opportunities to Rethink and Revise their understandings and work?E = Allow students to Evaluate their work and its implications?T = Be Tailored ([personalized) to the different needs, interests and abilities of learners?O = Be Organized to maximize initial and sustained engagement as well as effective learning?

L

Page 43: Why do we need to change?
Page 44: Why do we need to change?

The Six Facets of Understanding

Page 45: Why do we need to change?

The Understanding

Insightful use of knowledge and skill, observable in performanceRevealed via the “six facets of understanding”

Essential for maximal recall and apt transfer of “content” to new situationsReflective, recursive “spiral”

Conventional linear [textbook-driven] scope and sequence is a major impediment to developing understanding.

Page 46: Why do we need to change?

The Six Facets of Understanding

Facet 1 – EXPLANATION

Sophisticated and apt explanations and theories that provide knowledgeable and justified accounts of events, actions, and ideas. Why is that so? What explains such events? What accounts for such action? How can we prove it? To what is the action connected? How does this work?

Facet 2 – INTERPRETATION

Narratives, translations, metaphors, images , and artistry that provides meaning. What does it mean? Why does it matter? What of it? What does it illustrate or illumine in human experience? How does it relate to me? What makes sense?

Facet 3 – APPLICATION

Ability to use knowledge effectively in new situation s and diverse contexts. How and where can we apply this knowledge, skill, process? How should my thinking and action be modified to meet the demands of this particular situation?

Page 47: Why do we need to change?

Facet 4 - PERSPECTIVECritical and insightful points of view? From which vantage point? What is assumed or tacit that needs to made explicit and considered? What is justified and warranted? Is there adequate evidence? Is it reasonable? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the idea? Is it plausible? What are its limits? What is a novel way to look at this?Facet 5 – EMPATHYThe ability to get inside another person’s feelings and worldview. How does it seem to you? What do they see that I don’t? What do I need to experience if I were to understand? What was the author ,artist or performer feeling, seeing, and trying to make me feel and see?Facet 6 – SELF- KNOWLEDGEThe wisdom to know one’s ignorance and how one’s patterns of thought and action inform as well as prejudice understanding. How does who I am shape my views? What are the limits of my understanding? What are my blind spots? What am I prone to misunderstand because of prejudice, habit , and style? How do I learn best? What strategies work for me?

Page 48: Why do we need to change?
Page 49: Why do we need to change?

Write lesson plan & choose materials

Determine grading criteria

Design assessment

Identify what students learned

Reflect on what students should learn

12345

Page 50: Why do we need to change?

What do I want mystudents to learn?

ObjectivesContent & Skills

How will I know if mystudents have learned?

OutputCriteria

How will I teach themwhat they need to know?

ActivitiesMaterials

Step ThreeLESSON PLAN

Step TwoASSESSMENT

Step OneRESULTS

Page 51: Why do we need to change?

I. ObjectivesII. Content/MaterialsIII. Procedures/StrategyIV. MotivatorV. Activities

1.2.3.4.

VI. EvaluationVII. Homework

Page 52: Why do we need to change?

I. ObjectivesII. Subject AreaIII. ExploreIV. Firm UpV. DeepenVI. TransferVII. Evaluation

What do I want them to learn?What’s the topic?What do they know? What’s new?Give examples, reinforce learningExtend to Higher Order ThinkingHow can students apply knowledge?How do I know students learned?

Page 53: Why do we need to change?

I. ObjectivesII. Subject AreaIII. ExploreIV. Firm UpV. DeepenVI. TransferVII. Evaluation

I. ObjectivesII. Content/MaterialsIII.Procedures/StrategyIV.MotivatorV. Activities VI.EvaluationVII.Homework

newnew

same

same

combined

reordered

Previous Lesson Plan UbD Format

Page 54: Why do we need to change?

Curriculum Textbooks

Page 55: Why do we need to change?

Order of Planning Emphasis on Critical Thinking Terminology:

Higher Order Thinking Skills = Facets of Understanding

Page 56: Why do we need to change?
Page 57: Why do we need to change?

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BEST DESIGNS

1. Clear performance goals, based on a genuine and explicit challenge

2. Hands-on approach all throughout

3. Focus on interesting and important ideas, questions, issues and problems

4. Obvious real-world application, hence meaning for learners

5. Powerful feedback system, with opportunities to learn from trial and error

Page 58: Why do we need to change?

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BEST DESIGNS

6. Personalized approach, with more than one way to do major tasks and room for adapting the process and goal to style, interest, need

7 . Clear models and modeling

8. Time set aside for focused reflection

9. Variety in methods, grouping, tasks

10. Safe environment for taking risks

11. Teacher role resembles that of a facilitator or coach

Page 59: Why do we need to change?

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BEST DESIGNS

12. More of an immersion experience than a typical classroom experience

13. Big picture provided and clear throughout, with a transparent back-and-forth flow between the parts and the whole

Page 60: Why do we need to change?

UbD Unit Design StandardsStage 11. The listed Transfer Goals specify desired long-term, genuine accomplishment. (T)2. The identified Understanding reflect important, transferable ideas. (U)3. The identified Understandings are stated as full-sentence generalizations – Students will understand that….(U)4. Essential Questions are open- ended and thought provoking. (Q)5. Relevant Standards, Mission, and/or Program Goals (G) are addressed explicitly in all 3 stages.6. The identified knowledge (K) and skill (S) are needed to address the established goals, achieve the targeted understandings(S), and support effective transfer.7. All the elements- T, U, Q, G, K, S – are aligned so that Stage 1 is focused and coherent.

Page 61: Why do we need to change?

Stage 2

8. The specified assessments provide valid evidence of all desired results; i.e. ,Stage 2 aligns with Stage 1.

9. The specified assessments include authentic transfer tasks based on one or more facets of understanding.

10. The specified assessments provide sufficient opportunities for students to reveal their attainment of the Stage 1 goals.

11. Evaluative criteria for each assessment are aligned to Desired Results.

Page 62: Why do we need to change?

Stage 3

12. Appropriate learning events and instruction will help learners: a. Acquire targeted knowledge and skills. b. Make meaning of important ideas. c. Transfer their learning to new situations.

13.The W.H.E.R.E.T.O elements are included so that the unit is likely to be engaging and effective for all learners.

Overall 14. All 3 stages are coherent and in alignment.15. The unit design is feasible and appropriate for this situation.

Page 63: Why do we need to change?
Page 64: Why do we need to change?