Why do a_wraparound_mortgage
-
Upload
charles-tate -
Category
Documents
-
view
102 -
download
0
Transcript of Why do a_wraparound_mortgage
http://www.saferforyourlife.info/why-do-a-wrap-around-mortgage/ March 31, 2013
Why do a wrap-around mortgage?
A wrap-around mortgage is a loan transact ion in which the bank assumes responsibility for anexist ing mortgage. For example, Charles who has a $70,000 mortgage on his home sells his hometo Gary for $100,000. Gary pays $5,000 down and borrows $95,000 on a new mortgage.Thismortgage "wraps around" the present $70,000 mortgage because the new lender will make thepayments on the old mortgage. A wrap-around is sexy to banks because they will be able toleverage a reduced interest rate on the current mortgage into a higher yield for themselves. As anexample, suppose the $70,000 mortgage in the example has a rate of 6% and the new mortgagefor $95,000 has a rate of 8%. His total return on the $25,000 is about 13.5%. To do as well with asecond home loan, he would have to charge 13.5%..
Usually, not always, the lender is the seller. The alternat ive type of home-seller f inancing is asecond mortgage. The massive dif ference both approaches are that with second mortgagef inancing, the old mortgage is repaid; while with a wrap-around it is not. Assumable loans are thoseon which exist ing borrowers can transfer their needs to qualif ied house buyers. Today, only FHAand VA loans are assumable without the permission of the bank. Other f lat rate loans carry "dueon sale" clauses, which require that the mortgage be repaid in full if the property is sold. Due-on-sale prohibits a home customer f rom presuming a seller's outstanding mortgage without thelender's authorizat ion. If authorizat ion is given, it will always be at the current market rate.
Wrapping can frequent ly be used to by-pass restrict ions on presuming old loans, but I do notadvocate using it for this reason. The home seller who does this violates his contract with thebank, which he may or may not get away with. In most states, Escrow corporat ions are required bylaw to inform a bank whose loan is being wrapped. If a wrap-around deal on a non-assumable loandoes close and the lender uncovers it thereafter, watch out! The bank will either call the loan, ordemand an instant increase in IR and potent ially a healthy assumption fee.
When market IRs begin to rise, interest in wrapping assumable loans will also rise. The inducementto sellers is powerful, since they do not only obtain a high-yielding investment, but they canfrequent ly sell their home for a better price. But the high return carries a heavy risk.
When Charles, in my example sold his place with a wrap-around, he converted his equity f rom hishouse, which he no longer owns, to a mortgage loan. Previously, his equity was a $100,000 houseless a $70,000 mortgage. Now, his equity is composed of the $5,000 deposit and a $95,000mortgage that he owns less the $70,000 mortgage that he owes. The new owner Gary,has only$5,000 of equity in the property. If a t iny decline in market values erases that equity, the owner hasno f inance mot ivat ion to maintain the property. If the purchaser defaults on his mortgage, Charleswill be required to foreclose and sell the property to pay of f his very own mortgage.
In some seller-provided wrap-around, the payment by the buyer goes not to the seller but to athird party for t ransmission to the original bank. This is a very dodgy arrangement for the vendor,who remains liable for the f irst loan. He does not know if the payment on the old mortgage wasmade or not — unt il he receives not ice f rom the lender that it was not. I recent ly heard f rom a sellerwho did such a wrap-around in 1994, and has been gett ing the run-around ever since. Payments bythe purchaser have regularly been late, and the seller's credit has deteriorated consequent ly.
About Charles
Charles Tate Jr. has been recommending the use of non damaging household cleaners
Charles Tate Jr. has been recommending the use of non damaging household cleanersfor three years now, and he has been using assorted mediums to out line the risks ofcommon household cleaners and make recommendat ions for f it ter, more natural alternat ives.
The recommendat ions Charles: Has just released a E book ent it led 20 Reasons explaining whyHousehold Cleaners are Lethal to you and your Pets,