Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser...

92
Who wants to be an economist?

description

Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing match So if Bill Gates is rich, he must have taken that wealth from others The economic pie is only so big, so government has to make sure we all get the same size slice… “fairness” and “social justice”

Transcript of Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser...

Page 1: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Who wants to be an economist?

Page 2: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Se-ries1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Series 1Series 2Series 3

Page 3: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Zero-sum thinking

• Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing match

• So if Bill Gates is rich, he must have taken that wealth from others

• The economic pie is only so big, so government has to make sure we all get the same size slice… “fairness” and “social justice”

Page 4: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Fallacy of composition

• The mistaken assumption that what applies to a part applies to the whole

• In economics, we’re looking at the economy in total… not any given individual, company or industry

• We know that the economy is dynamic… some companies and industries must pass (typesetters, milkmen) so others can rise (app developers, organic bakers)

Page 5: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Fractional Reserve Banking

• A system that enables banks to only have on hand a fraction of the total reserves needed to cover all deposits

• Since all depositors won’t demand their money at once, banks lend out the rest and earn interest and fees

• Fractional reserve banking creates “new” money to create wealth

Page 6: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Why does corruption lead to poverty?

• “The law’s delay...”• Bureaucrat ability to delay often means an

opportunity for bribes• The lost opportunity for SRTHAU in businesses

not started, investment not made, jobs not created

• Which means fewer goods and services... and less prosperity

Page 7: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 8: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 9: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Just what does an economist do?

Page 10: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• Do research including preparing surveys and crunching the numbers

Page 11: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• Do research including preparing surveys and crunching the numbers

• Forecast how the economy might change in the future

Page 12: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• Do research including preparing surveys and crunching the numbers

• Forecast how the economy might change in the future

• They study topics such as prices, jobs, interest rates, taxes, the stock market, commodities, money, the banking system, impacts from political decisions

Page 13: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• They then write up their reports and present the findings to clients

Page 14: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• They then write up their reports and present the findings to clients

• They are really good at PowerPoint and developing charts, graphs and flow charts

Page 15: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• They then write up their reports and present the findings to clients

• They are really good at PowerPoint and developing charts, graphs and flow charts

• They spend a lot of time crunching numbers and doing statistical modeling

Page 16: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 17: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• More than half of economists work for federal, state and local governments

Page 18: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• More than half of economists work for federal, state and local governments

• Many work for banks, consulting firms, NGOs or are self-employed

Page 19: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

NGOs

• United Nations, Greenpeace, Amnesty International, AARP, Doctors Without Borders,

Page 20: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• More than half of economists work for federal, state and local governments

• Many work for banks, consulting firms, NGOs or are self-employed

• And the rest live in the academic environment or non-profit “think” tanks such as The Heritage Foundation, Hoover Institution and Brookings Institute

Page 21: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• The media pay is $90,000 year

Page 22: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• The media pay is $90,000 year• There are just 15,400 jobs and it’s a slow-

growth profession

Page 23: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• The media pay is $90,000 year• There are just 15,400 jobs and it’s a slow-

growth profession• Most positions require a Ph.D. or at least a

master’s degree

Page 24: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Economists

• The media pay is $90,000 year• There are just 15,400 jobs and it’s a slow-

growth profession• Most positions require a Ph.D. or at least a

master’s degree• Lots of young people with a B.A. degree in

econ work in other fields

Page 25: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Top economics schools

Page 26: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Top economics schools • Harvard• Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)• Princeton• University of Chicago• Stanford• University of California – Berkeley• Northwestern• Yale• University of Pennsylvania• Columbia

Page 27: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Top economics schools

• University of Florida was #48

Page 28: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 29: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 30: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

History of economics

• Modern economics began in 1776 with our pal Adam Smith (1723-1790) and The Wealth of Nations

Page 31: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 32: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

History of economics

• Modern economics began in 1776 with our pal Adam Smith (1723-1790) and The Wealth of Nations

• Smith influenced generations of economists and thinkers including David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton… and Thomas Sowell

Page 33: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Adam Smith

• “Every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain; and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.”[

Page 34: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Adam Smith

• In short, the “invisible hand” refers to the self-regulating behavior of the marketplace when people, acting in their own self interest, benefit society

Page 35: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

History of economics

• Over time, “schools” of economics formed about common framework of assumptions and that continues today

Page 36: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

History of economics

• Over time, “schools” of economics formed about common framework of assumptions and that continues today

• Chicago, London, Austrian, Carnegie… also loosely organized around “saltwater” schools (on both U.S. coasts) and “freshwater” schools (Chicago, Carnegie Mellon)

Page 37: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Mercantilists

• Popular from 16th to late 18th centuries, the earliest of the economic schools

Page 38: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Mercantilists

• Popular from 16th to late 18th centuries, the earliest of the economic schools

• James Steuart was most prominent writer• Mercantilists argued that the most important

role for government was to ensure a positive balance of trade… export more than you import

Page 39: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Mercantilists

• Popular from 16th to late 18th centuries, the earliest of the economic schools

• James Steuart was most prominent writer• Mercantilists argued that the most important

role for government was to ensure a positive balance of trade… export more than you import

• They were zero summers!

Page 40: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Mercantilists

• Were concerned with the power of their nation relative to others

• They didn’t care about SRTHAU to maximize their nation’s standard of living, they wanted more wealth and military power than other nations

Page 41: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Mercantilists

• Were concerned with the power of their nation relative to others

• They didn’t care about SRTHAU to maximize their nation’s standard of living, they wanted more wealth and military power than other nations

• Typical policies included overseas colonies, ban on the export of gold, tariffs, wage limits, imperialism, subsidies for domestic manufacture

Page 42: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Final Mercantilist thought

• Although gone from modern economic thinking, concepts about imports/exports remain such as “favorable balance of trade”

Page 43: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 44: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• ‘Wealth of Nations’ ended the mercantilists, although some of their policies such as positive balance of trade and tariffs endure

Page 45: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• ‘Wealth of Nations’ ended the mercantilists, although some of their policies such as positive balance of trade and tariffs endure

• Smith realized that the prosperity of a nation depended on creating more goods and services… and that economic policy should be for everyone’s benefit, not just the merchants

Page 46: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• ‘Wealth of Nations’ ended the mercantilists, although some of their policies such as positive balance of trade and tariffs endure

• Smith realized that the prosperity of a nation depended on creating more goods and services… and that economic policy should be for everyone’s benefit, not just the merchants

• Smith also rejected slavery and imperialism

Page 47: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• ‘Wealth of Nations’ ended the mercantilists, although some of their policies such as positive balance of trade and tariffs endure

• Smith realized that the prosperity of a nation depended on creating more goods and services… and that economic policy should be for everyone’s benefit, not just the merchants

• Smith also rejected slavery and imperialism• His theories led to the school of Classical Economics,

with a nod to the Physiocrats

Page 48: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Physiocrats

• French economists who advocated that productive farm work, not gold, was key to wealth of a nation

• Because of the agrarian society, they thought only agriculture land counted

• First used the term “laissez-faire”… originally meaning not having the government intervene in marketplace on behalf of merchants

Page 49: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• Smith was radical: preached a sharply reduced role for government and elites

Page 50: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• Smith was radical: preached a sharply reduced role for government and elites

• Argued that wealth is not a zero-sum game… everyone can win in both foreign trade and the domestic market

Page 51: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• Smith was radical: preached a sharply reduced role for government and elites

• Argued that wealth is not a zero-sum game… everyone can win in both foreign trade and the domestic market

• The free market will regulate itself due to the invisible hand

Page 52: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Classical economics

• Smith was radical: preached a sharply reduced role for government and elites

• Argued that wealth is not a zero-sum game… everyone can win in both foreign trade and the domestic market

• The free market will regulate itself due to the invisible hand

• The Classical economists changed economics from a concern with a ruler’s interests to that of the nation

Page 53: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 54: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

David Ricardo1772-1823

• Most influential economist of the early 19th century

• Developed “comparative advantage,” which showed how two unequal nations could trade to mutual benefit

• Was also the first to use economics dispassionately… principles over immediate policy issues

Page 55: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Say’s Law

• Developed by French economist Jean-Baptiste Say (1767-1832)

Page 56: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Say’s Law

• Developed by French economist Jean-Baptiste Say (1767-1832)

• Say addressed the fears that a growing nation would produce so many good and services that it would exceed the ability of the people to buy them

Page 57: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Say’s Law

• Developed by French economist Jean-Baptiste Say (1767-1832)

• Say addressed the fears that a growing nation would produce so many good and services that it would exceed the ability of the people to buy them

• Say argued that the national output and the income people had were related… “supply creates its own demand” and, therefore, no limit to what it can produce

Page 58: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Modern economics

• First exclusive journal was in 1886, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics” at Harvard

Page 59: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 60: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Modern economics

• First exclusive journal was in 1886, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics” at Harvard

• First U.S. professor of economics appointed in 1871 at Harvard, which awards first Ph.D. in 1875

Page 61: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Modern economics

• First exclusive journal was in 1886, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics” at Harvard

• First U.S. professor of economics appointed in 1871 at Harvard, which awards first Ph.D. in 1875

• Economics in 20th century began to turn to mathematics rather than verbal discourses

Page 62: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Modern economics

• First exclusive journal was in 1886, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics” at Harvard

• First U.S. professor of economics appointed in 1871 at Harvard, which awards first Ph.D. in 1875

• Economics in 20th century began to turn to mathematics rather than verbal discourses

• At LAF, we’ve continued the verbal tradition!

Page 63: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Marginalist revolution

Page 64: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Marginalist revolution

• Refers to acceptance among economists that prices were based on the demands of consumers, rather than just on the cost of the producers

Page 65: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Marginalist revolution

• Refers to acceptance among economists that prices were based on the demands of consumers, rather than just on the cost of the producers

• Classical econ says labor and other inputs are crucial factors in prices. Marx went even further when he wrote that exploitation of labor was the main factor in economics and society

Page 66: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 67: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Marginalist revolution

• Marginal utility theory of value: what consumers consider useful was what influenced prices

• So while if you’re dying of thirst water is more valuable than diamonds

• Once you have enough water, it’s the marginal utility of having another gallon of water compared to a diamond. Because most of us have lots of water, diamonds will sell for more

Page 68: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Marginalist revolution, redux

• Anyway, it’s the combo of supply (dependent on the cost of production) and demand (dependent on marginal utility) which determines prices

• Ok?

Page 69: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Marginalist revolution, redux

• Anyway, it’s the combo of supply (dependent on the cost of production) and demand (dependent on marginal utility) which determines prices

• Ok?

Page 70: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 71: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Equilibrium theory

• Developed by Frenchman Leon Walras (1834-1910)

• It’s a branch of theoretical economics (because things are rarely in equilibrium) that looks at prices/supply and demand for firms, industries and particular markets

Page 72: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Equilibrium theory

• Developed by Frenchman Leon Walras (1834-1910)• It’s a branch of theoretical economics (because

things are rarely in equilibrium) that looks at prices/supply and demand for firms, industries and particular markets

• In a sentence: equilibrium theory notes that everything in an economy is interconnected so that one small change can set in motion many others

Page 73: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Try this definition

“The theory provides a summary description of economic interaction in a society where people are free to pursue their own interests. The theory may be viewed as an attempt to answer the question of whether trade arranged through markets could match demands with supplies for millions of goods and services in an economically efficient way. Notice that the question is could trade achieve an efficient outcome, not does it do so.”

Page 74: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Ok, what’s macro and micro??

• Macroeconomics: basically deals with the performance, structure, and behavior of a national economy as a whole. Macroeconomists seek to understand the determinants of aggregate trends in an economy with particular focus on national income, employment, inflation, investment, and international trade.

Page 75: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

And micro?

• Microeconomics is a branch of economics that studies how individuals, households, and firms make decisions to allocate limited resources, typically in markets where goods or services are being bought and sold.

• Microeconomics examines how these decisions and behaviors affect the supply and demand for goods and services, which determines prices, and how prices, in turn, determine the supply and demand of goods and services.

Page 76: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 77: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Why should I care??

• Because politicians constantly propose solutions to problems “without the slightest attention to how the repercussions of their ‘solution’ will reverberate throughout the economy…”

Page 78: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 79: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

John Maynard Keynes (say ‘Cains’)

• Keynes (1883-1946) was the most prominent economist of the 20th century

• His book “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money” became the prevailing orthodoxy around the world… with a few important exceptions

• Keynes rose to prominence after the Great Depression

Page 80: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Keynesian economics

• Keynes argued that inadequate “aggregate demand” could lead to high unemployment

Page 81: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Keynesian economics

• Keynes argued that inadequate “aggregate demand” could lead to high unemployment

• He argued for governments to spend money during recessions and depressions to spur the economy (see President Obama)

Page 82: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Keynesian economics

• Keynes argued that inadequate “aggregate demand” could lead to high unemployment

• He argued for governments to spend money during recessions and depressions to spur the economy (see President Obama)

• Thus government could smooth out the boom and bust cycles inherent in free markets

Page 83: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Keynesian economics

• Keynes argued that inadequate “aggregate demand” could lead to high unemployment

• He argued for governments to spend money during recessions and depressions to spur the economy (see President Obama)

• Thus government could smooth out the boom and bust cycles inherent in free markets

• Was the dominant thinking through the 1970s and resurfaced with the recent global recession

Page 84: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 85: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Milton Friedman

• Friedman (1912-2006) was an American economist at the University of Chicago who started the “Chicago school” of economics

• He opposed Keynesian theory and argued the markets were more rational and responsive than governments were

• Won Nobel prize in 1976 when raging inflation worldwide undermined the Keynesians’ ability to control the economy

• Advisor to President Reagan

Page 86: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Milton Friedman

• “I am favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it's possible.”

• “The greatest advances of civilization, whether in architecture or painting, in science and literature, in industry or agriculture, have never come from centralized government.”

Page 87: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 88: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

F.A. Hayek

• Austrian economist (1899-1992) who won Nobel prize in 1974 while at U of Chicago

• Was the one who developed theory of prices communicating information that enables people to coordinate their plans

• “Road to Serfdom” is a must-read for every budding economist. A war-cry against central planning

Page 89: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 90: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Paul Krugman

• Nobel-prize winner in 2008• Hugely influential because he works for the New York

Times and his column is gospel for liberal politicians• A Keynesian on steroids• “I believe in a relatively equal society, supported by

institutions that limit extremes of wealth and poverty. I believe in democracy, civil liberties, and the rule of law. That makes me a liberal, and I’m proud of it.”

Page 91: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.
Page 92: Who wants to be an economist?. Zero-sum thinking Refers to the idea that there is a winner and loser in all transactions, kind of like a tennis or boxing.

Assignment 4/22

• Chapter 20: “International Trade”