While you wait…check out CEPH’s Round 3 criteria · Ms. Mollie Mulvanity ... CEPH...
Transcript of While you wait…check out CEPH’s Round 3 criteria · Ms. Mollie Mulvanity ... CEPH...
What’s New in Round 3:
ASPPH and CEPH Dialogue on
Accreditation
Thursday March 10, 2016
12:00 – 1:00 pm EST
Sponsored by the ASPPH Accreditation and
Credentialing Committee
Webinar Moderator
Dean David C. Goff
Colorado School of Public Health:
University of Colorado | Colorado
State University | University of
Northern Colorado
Chair, ASPPH Accreditation and
Credentialing Committee
ASPPH-Member Councilors to CEPH
Dean Donna
Petersen,
(South
Florida),
term begins
April 1, 2016
Dean Iman
Hakim
(Arizona)
Dr. Ian Lapp,
CEPH
President
(Harvard),
term ends
March 31,
2016
Ms. Ruth
Gaare
Bernheim
(UVA)
Dean John
Finnegan
(Minnesota)
Ms. Mollie Mulvanity
Deputy Director
Council on Education for
Public Health
CEPH Representatives
Ms. Laura Rasar King
Executive Director
Council on Education for
Public Health
Review of ASPPH Work in Round 2
Dean David C. Goff
Colorado School of Public Health:
University of Colorado | Colorado
State University | University of
Northern Colorado
Chair, ASPPH Accreditation and
Credentialing Committee
Criteria in Round 3
Introduction
A Organization & Decision Making
B Mission & Evaluation
C Resources
D Curriculum
E Faculty
F Community Engagement
G Diversity
H Student Services
See the criteria at http://ceph.org/assets/Draft_criteria_3.pdf
1. Academic Affairs’ Section
2. Accreditation and Credentialing Committee
3. Behavioral and Social Science Forum
4. Career Services Forum
5. Data Committee
6. Diversity and Inclusion Committee
7. DrPH Council (jointly with the Acad Affairs’ Section DrPH subgroup)
8. DrPH Degree Framing Group
9. Environmental Health Forum
10. Faculty Affairs Leads
11. Finance and Administration Section
12. Health Policy and Management Forum
13. Joint/Dual Degrees Group (inclusive of reps of the Population Health across
All Professions expert panel of the FTF Task Force)
14. Mapping Subgroup
15. MPH Council (jointly with the Acad Affairs’ Section MPH subgroup)
16. Practice Section
17. Research Section
ASPPH Work Groups Staffed to Prepare Responses
Your Response is Critical!
• All are encouraged to comment directly to CEPH by
emailing Mollie at [email protected] or to pose
questions to Mollie or Laura ([email protected]) as well as
through this ASPPH process
• The ASPPH comment submission process should not be
considered a substitute for institutional or individual
means of commenting
• ASPPH-member comments should go to Liz Weist
([email protected] or 202/296-1099 x. 129)
Remarks from the CEPH President
Dean Donna
Petersen,
(South
Florida),
term begins
April 1, 2016
Dean Iman
Hakim
(Arizona)
Dr. Ian Lapp,
CEPH
President
(Harvard),
term ends
March 31,
2016
Ms. Ruth
Gaare
Bernheim
(UVA)
Dean John
Finnegan
(Minnesota)
Ms. Mollie Mulvanity
Deputy Director
Council on Education for
Public Health
CEPH’s Update for Round 3
Major Goals/Priorities
• Ensure quality of education in public
health
• Our mission
• Our charge from USDE
• Increase flexibility and opportunities for
innovation
• Simplify and reduce the reporting burden
• Preserve the school
distinction/designation
• ASPPH’s request
2014
• Discussions begin in Council
• Web survey to stakeholders
• Technical Assistance Session
with Q & A
2015 2016
• Released curricular criteria
for comment (Feb)
• Web-based & in-person
presentations to groups,
listening sessions, Q & A
• Considered Round 1
comments on curriculum
• Released full draft for
comment (Nov)
• Employer Panel at APHA
(Nov)
• Considered Round 2
comments (Jan)
• Released revised full draft for
comment (Feb)
• Consider Round 3 comments
(June)
• Release updated draft for
comment (July)
• Consider Round 4 comments
(October)
• Adopt final criteria &
implementation plan (release
in November)
Major proposed changes: review & overview
• “5 core areas” replaced with specific competencies
defined for all MPH students
• Redefinition of SPH requirements
• 3 MPH
• 2 doctoral
• SBP curricular criteria integrated in SPH & PHP criteria
• Changes in methods of “counting” faculty resources
• Flexibility in practice experience requirements for MPH
• Greater definition for DrPH
• Vastly reduced reporting burden in research, service, etc.
Major changes between rounds 2 & 3 of comment
• Reduced # of required MPH & DrPH foundational
competencies & updated content
• Clarified criteria that elicited comments/questions
• MPH practice experience
• Tracking post-graduation outcomes
• Adjusted faculty resource requirements
• Fewer restrictions on double-counting
• Added “Foundational PH Knowledge” for MPH & DrPH,
separate from competencies for each
Some emerging consensus during round 2...
• Consensus on many areas
• Identified priority areas for continuing discussion
• # of required SPH degree offerings
• Evaluation & outcomes
• Faculty resources
• MPH, DrPH, MS, PhD & other grad curricula
• All criteria open for comment in round 3, though priority
areas are intended focus
Next steps
• Comments due to CEPH by COB on
May 16
• Stay tuned in early July for next draft!
• Next comment period in summer to
early fall—likely due date in mid- to
late September
• Anticipated release of criteria &
implementation plan in late Oct –
early Nov
• Implementation plan will explain
what you need to do & by when
• Past experience suggests 1st SVs
with new criteria will be in 2018,
but nothing decided yet!
Wrapping Up
Dean David C. Goff
Colorado School of Public Health:
University of Colorado | Colorado
State University | University of
Northern Colorado
Chair, ASPPH Accreditation and
Credentialing Committee
Activity Dates (subject to change)
Groups Staffed to Elicit Comments Feb. – May
Accreditation Committee Meetings March 22 & April 25
All Individual and Groups’
Comments Due to ASPPHApril 19
Accreditation Focus Group and/or
Another Webinar?Late April?
ASPPH Member Review of Draft
Letter to CEPHLate April/Early May
Response due to CEPH May 16, 2016
ASPPH’s Immediate Next Steps
Concluding Remarks
• We will carefully review the discussions which took place
during this listening session
• Staff to each ASPPH-organized group will coordinate groups’
responses
• Continue sending your institutional and individual comments
to ASPPH (send to [email protected])
• Join the Online Community “Accreditation Review Group”
(info on the next slide)
• Stay tuned for an archived version of the webinar posted on
the ASPPH website (http://www.aspph.org/event/accreditation-webinar-
on-cephs-criteria-revisions-round-2/)
Accreditation in ASPPH’s New
Online Community
Who: Member faculty, staff, students, and alumni
How: Upon request via email to Liz Weist [email protected]