Lecture on the concept of heritability in Plant Breeding ( [email protected] , March 2012)
Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences...
Transcript of Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences...
![Page 1: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
What a contrastive analysis of copula sentencescan tell us about the development of the
Romance pronominal address systemsSASCHA GAGLIA
SGAGL I [email protected]
1INAR 05, Sheffield (UK), June 2019
![Page 2: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline1 Introduction
2 Previous Research
3 Analysis
3.1 French
3.2 Spanish
3.3 Italian
3.4 Diachronic Synopsis
4 Results
2
![Page 3: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1 Introduction
3
![Page 4: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ExamplesPolite copula sentence Conflicting Grammatical
Category
(1a) Mod. French Vous2PL êtes2PL loyalSG.MAS ‚You are loyal.‘ NUM
(1b) Old Spanish Vos2PL sodes2PL ondradoSG.MAS ‚You are honored.‘ NUM
(1c) Mod. Eur. Sp. Usted3SG es3SG generosoSG.MAS ‚You are generous.‘ No conflict
(1d) Old Italian Voi2PL siete2PL generosoSG.MAS ‚You are generous.‘ NUM
(1e) Mod. Italian Lei3SG.FEM è3SG generosoSG.MAS ‚You are generous.‘ GEN
4
![Page 5: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Research questions
I. How must SUBJECT, PREDICATE and PREDICATIVE ADJECTIVE be specified?
II. What kinds of diachronic changes can be observed regarding their specification(s)?
III. What are the reasons for the different developments in French, Spanish & Italian?
5
![Page 6: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
POLITENESS-feature in Bavarian GermanBavarian German needs a morpho-syntactic politeness feature because of a distinct politeness morphem(Simon 2003):
(2a) heid sing-st oba schee neutral address
today sing-2SG really nice
(2b) heid sing-a(n)-s oba schee formal address [+POLITE]today sing-POL really nice
(2c) heid sing-and-s oba schee 3PL
today sing-3PL really nice
6
![Page 7: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2 Previous Research
7
![Page 8: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
‚Hybrid Agreement‘ in Wechsler (2011)Vous SUBJ INDX PERS=2
INDX NUM=PLCONC NUM=PL
CONC GEN=
êtes PRED SUBJ INDX PERS=2SUBJ INDX NUM=PL
loyal XCOMP SUBJ CONC NUM=SG or semantically [Singular]SUBJ CONC GEN=MAS or semantically [Male]
8(see also Comrie 1975, Pollard & Sag 1994, Kathol 1999, Wechsler & Hahm 2011)
![Page 9: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3 Analysis
9
(GAGLIA IN PRESS, A & B)
![Page 10: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG)Lexicon = Inventory of lexical entries;
in the traditional model: simple feature sets
c(onstituent)-Structure = Level of syntactic structure
f(unctional)-Structure = Level of feature unifications
(e.g. Kaplan & Bresnan & 1982)
10
![Page 11: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Coming back to Modern French Vous SUBJ PERS=2
NUM=PL
êtes PRED PERS=2NUM=PL
loyal XCOMP NUM=SGGEN=MAS
Proposal:1) HON=+ for vous (→ Lexicon)2) Constraint (→ c-Structure)
M
11
![Page 12: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
3.1 French
12
![Page 13: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Lexiconvous, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ êtes, V PRED=‚ÊTRE‘
PERS=2 SUBJ PERS=2NUM=PL SUBJ NUM = PLHON=+
loyal, A PRED=‚LOYAL‘SUBJ NUM=SGSUBJ GEN = MAS
13
![Page 14: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
c-Structure: French
14
S
VP
AP
![Page 15: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
f-Structure: French
15
s(emantic)-Structure:loyal(addr,x=1,male)
![Page 16: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
s(emantic)-Structure:loyal(addr,x=1,male)
prag(matic)-Structure:(honorerspk, honoredaddr)
![Page 17: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
3.2 Spanish
17
![Page 18: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
c-Structure: Old Spanish
18
VP
APNP
S
![Page 19: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
f-Structure: Old Spanish
19
s-Structure:generoso(addr,x=1,male)
![Page 20: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Lexicon: Old Spanish (revised)vos, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ sodes,V PRED=‚SER(↑SUBJ,↑XCOMP)‘
PERS=2 SUBJ PERS=2NUM=PL SUBJ NUM=PLHON=+ SUBJ HON=+
tú, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ eres,V PRED=‚SER(↑SUBJ,↑XCOMP)‘ PERS=2 SUBJ PERS=2NUM=SG SUBJ NUM=SGHON= – SUBJ HON= –
generoso, A PRED=‚GENEROSO‘(↑SUBJ)‘ SUBJ NUM=SGSUBJ GEN = MAS
20
![Page 21: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Modern Chilean Spanish
Threeway branching T/V-system in the singular consisting of tú, vos and usted ; free variationbetween 2SG- and 2PL-forms:
(3a) Tú eres generoso. 2SG-2SG= Tuteo (T)
(3b) Tú eríh generoso. 2SG-2PL = Voseo (mixto) verbal (T)
(3c) Vos eríh generoso. 2PL-2PL = Voseo auténtico (T)
(3d) Vos eres generoso. 2PL-2SG = Voseo pronominal (T)
(3e) Usted es generoso. 3SG-3SG= Ustedeo (V)
21
![Page 22: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Lexicon: Chilean Spanishtú, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ eres, V PRED=‚SER(↑SUBJ,↑XCOMP)‘
PERS=2 SUBJ PERS=2NUM=SG SUBJ NUM=SGHON= – SUBJ HON= –
vos, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ eríh, V PRED=‚SER(↑SUBJ,↑XCOMP)‘PERS=2 SUBJ PERS=2NUM=SG SUBJ NUM=SGHON= – SUBJ HON= –
generoso, A PRED=‚GENEROSO‘(↑SUBJ)‘ SUBJ NUM=SGSUBJ GEN = MAS
22
![Page 23: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
c-Structure: Mod. Chil. Spanish
23
S
NP
VP
AP
![Page 24: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
f-Structure: Chil. Spanish
24
s-Structure:generoso(addr,x=1,male)
![Page 25: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
3.3 Italian
25
![Page 26: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Lexicon: Old Italian
26
voi, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ siete,V PRED=‚ESSERE(↑SUBJ,↑XCOMP)‘ PERS=2 SUBJ PERS=2NUM=PL SUBJ NUM=PLHON=+ SUBJ HON=+
tu, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ sei,V PRED=‚ESSERE(↑SUBJ,↑XCOMP)‘ PERS=2 SUBJ PERS=2NUM=SG SUBJ NUM=SGHON= – SUBJ HON= –
![Page 27: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
c-Structure: Old Italian
27
NP
VP
AP
S
![Page 28: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
f-Structure: Old Italian
28
s-Structuregeneroso(addr,x=1,male)
![Page 29: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Lexicon: Modern Italian
29
lei, Pron PRED=‚PRO‘ è, V PRED=‚ESSERE(↑SUBJ,↑XCOMP)‘ PERS=3 SUBJ PERS=3NUM=SG SUBJ NUM=SGGEN= FEM HON=+
generoso, A PRED=‚GENEROSO‘(↑SUBJ)‘ SUBJ NUM=SGSUBJ GEN = MAS
![Page 30: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
c-Structure: Modern Italian
30
AP
VP
NP
S
![Page 31: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
f-Structure: Modern Italian
31
s-Structuregeneroso(addr,x=1,male)
![Page 32: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
3.4 Synopsis
32
![Page 33: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Old/Mod. Fr. Old Sp. >>> >>> Mod. Eur.Sp.
Col. Chil. Sp. Mod. Chil. Sp.
Old It. Mod. St. It.
Lexi
con
(T)
tuPERS=2
NUM=SG
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
vosPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
†
( tú )( PERS=2 )
( NUM=SG )( HON= – )
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
vosPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
tuPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
tu PERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
(V)
vousPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
vosPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
vosPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
VMPERS=3
NUM=SG
ustedPERS=3
NUM=SGHON=+
ustedPERS=3
NUM=SGHON=+
vosPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
VMPERS=3
NUM=SG
ustedPERS=3
NUM=SGHON=+
voiPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
†
leiPERS=3
NUM=SGGEN=FEM
HON=+
c-St
ruct
ure
V‘(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
--
--
--
--
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
--
--
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓(↑GEN)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
--
![Page 34: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Old/Mod. Fr. Old Sp. >>> >>> Mod. Eur.Sp.
Col. Chil. Sp. Mod. Chil. Sp.
Old It. Mod. St. It.
Lexi
con
(T)
tuPERS=2
NUM=SG
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
vosPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
†
( tú )( PERS=2 )
( NUM=SG )( HON= – )
túPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
vosPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
tuPERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
tu PERS=2
NUM=SGHON= –
(V)
vousPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
vosPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
vosPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
VMPERS=3
NUM=SG
ustedPERS=3
NUM=SGHON=+
ustedPERS=3
NUM=SGHON=+
vosPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
VMPERS=3
NUM=SG
ustedPERS=3
NUM=SGHON=+
voiPERS=2
NUM=PLHON=+
†
leiPERS=3
NUM=SGGEN=FEM
HON=+
c-St
ruct
ure
V‘(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
--
--
--
--
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
--
--
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
V‘(↑S.PERS)=↓(↑S.NUM)=↓¬(↑S.HON)=+
NP(↑SUBJ)
(↑PERS)=↓(↑NUM)=↓(↑GEN)=↓¬(↑HON)=+
--
![Page 35: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
4 Results
35
![Page 36: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Results
I. How must SUBJ, PREDICATE and the PREDICATIVE ADJECTIVE be specified?
LEX: O. Fr./Mod. Fr. vous, O. Sp. vos, O. It. voi as NUM=PL, HON=+;
Mod. Chil. Sp. vos is morpho-syntactically NUM=SG
Mod. It. lei as GEN=FEM, HON=+
c-STR: O. Fr./Mod. Fr.: NUM-Constraint for V‘
O. Sp., O. It.: NUM-Constraint for NP and V‘
Mod. It.: GEN-Constraint for NP and V‘
36
![Page 37: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Results (continued) II. What kinds of diachronic changes can be observed regarding their specifications?
FR: constant formal opposition; Nullsubject > obligatory Subject-CLs
EUR. SP: vos (NUM=PL, HON=+) → vos (NUM=SG) → NULL
CHIL. SP: vos (NUM=PL, HON=+) → vos (NUM=SG) (towards NULL?)
IT: voi (NUM=PL, HON=+) → (qu)ella (GEN=FEM, HON=+) → lei (GEN=FEM, HON=+)
??generalization of→ lui (GEN=MAS, HON=+)
III. What are the reasons for the different developments?
- Socio-pragmatic pressure
- Feature dependent pressure
37
![Page 38: Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences ... · Whata contrastiveanalysisofcopulasentences cantellusaboutthedevelopmentofthe Romancepronominal addresssystems SASCHA GAGLIA SGAGLIA@GWDG.DE](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040509/5e51d1bbd09e195c035b2914/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
BibliographyComrie, B. 1975. Polite Plurals and Predicate Agreement. Language 51.406-18.
Gaglia, S. (in press, a). Die Grammatik der Höflichkeitsanrede im Französischen, Italienischen und Spanischen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. [= Habilitation thesis, Goettingen, 2018]
Gaglia, S. (in press, b). Las interfaces gramaticales en el sistema de tratamiento pronominal-verbal del castellano europeo y chileno desde una perspectiva sincrónica y diacrónica. Figueroa Candia, M. et al. (eds.), [Volume on recent trends in Chilean linguistics]. Wilmington: Vernon Press. [Paper]
Gaglia, S. & Rivadeneira, M. (submitted). Las formas de tratamiento en Chile: Convergencia de rasgos gramaticales y sociolingüísticos. [Paper]
Kaplan, R. & Bresnan, J. 1982. Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation. Bresnan, J. (ed.): The Mental representation of grammatical reations. Cambridge: MIT Press. 173-281.
Kathol, A. 1999. Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. Levine, R.D. et al. (ed.): Studies in Contemporary Phase
Structure Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. 223-274.
Pollard, C.l. & Sag, I.A. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI.
Simon, H. 2003. Für eine grammatische Kategorie ‚Respekt‘ im Deutschen: Diachronie, Synchronie und Typologie der deutschen
Anredepronomina. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Wechsler, S. 2011. Mixed agreement, the person feature, and the index/concord distinction. NLLT 29.999-1031. 38