What Really[1]
description
Transcript of What Really[1]
![Page 1: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible MarketersEmerald Article: What really works for teenagers: human or fictional celebrity?Varsha Jain, Subhadip Roy, Aarzoo Daswani, Mari Sudha
Article information:
To cite this document: Varsha Jain, Subhadip Roy, Aarzoo Daswani, Mari Sudha, (2011),"What really works for teenagers: human or fictional celebrity?", Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, Vol. 12 Iss: 2 pp. 171 - 183
Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17473611111141623
Downloaded on: 25-10-2012
References: This document contains references to 34 other documents
To copy this document: [email protected]
Users who downloaded this Article also downloaded: *
Steve Dix, Ian Phau, Sonia Pougnet, (2010),""Bend it like Beckham": the influence of sports celebrities on young adult consumers", Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, Vol. 11 Iss: 1 pp. 36 - 46http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17473611011025993
Nisachon Tantiseneepong, Matthew Gorton, John White, (2012),"Evaluating responses to celebrity endorsements using projective techniques", Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 15 Iss: 1 pp. 57 - 69http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13522751211191991
Amanda Spry, Ravi Pappu, T. Bettina Cornwell, (2011),"Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45 Iss: 6 pp. 882 - 909http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090561111119958
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by LAHORE UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES
For Authors: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service. Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comWith over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
![Page 2: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What really works for teenagers: human orfictional celebrity?
Varsha Jain, Subhadip Roy, Aarzoo Daswani and Mari Sudha
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to explore the relative effectiveness of a human celebrity endorser vis-a-vis a
fictional celebrity or character endorser on teenage consumers’ attitudes. Further, the study also seeks
to assess whether the effectiveness varies depending on the nature of the product being endorsed.
Design/methodology/approach – Given the purpose of the study, experimental design was used as
the research methodology. In an experimental set-up three product categories (low-involvement
food/low-involvement non-food/high-involvement) and two endorsers (human celebrity/fictional
celebrity) and a control group were deployed in a 3 £ 3 full factorial design on 378 teenagers.
Fictitious advertisements were used as stimuli.
Findings – The study suggests that, for food and non-food low-involvement product categories, the
impact of a human celebrity is more than that of a fictional celebrity. Regarding the purchase intentions
of teenagers, it was found that a human celebrity is more effective than a fictional celebrity in food and
non-food low-involvement products. In the case of the high-involvement product, the human celebrity
was not found to create favorable consumer attitudes.
Research limitations/implications – The study results suggest that celebrity endorsements are useful,
but the nature of the product also has an influence on success. One limitation of the study was the
restriction to print advertisements.
Practical implications – A major implication from the findings for the managers is that a human
celebrity may not always be the right choice for any product promotion for teenagers. More specifically,
for high-involvement products, celebrity endorsement needs to be handled with caution since it may not
prove to be successful.
Originality/value – The contribution of the study is in addressing an area that has not been very well
researched as yet, and in addressing a research question that has not been investigated properly.
Keywords Celebrities, Youth, Consumer behaviour, Product endorsement
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
One of the factors that is important in making an advertisement likeable is the use of positive
characters, i.e. those perceived to be credible, memorable, intriguing, amusing and bright
(Leather et al., 1994). Celebrities are considered to be such positive characters and are
used extensively in product endorsement activities. About 60 percent of advertisement
expenditure in India consists of celebrity endorsements (Saxena, 2008). The booming
advertising industry has seen a spurt of celebrity endorsements across all product
categories. Celebrity endorsements are perceived to cut through ad clutter and are effective
in building credibility for the brand while generating spin-off publicity through public
relations. New brands get recognition and this aids in positioning and repositioning the
brands (Kaikati, 1987). Celebrity endorsements are not only fruitful in appealing to the target
audience (Erdogan, 2005), but also in bringing reliability and trust to the brands endorsed
(Challapalli, 2007).
DOI 10.1108/17473611111141623 VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011, pp. 171-183, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1747-3616 j YOUNG CONSUMERS j PAGE 171
Varsha Jain is a Research
Fellow and Head of the IMC
Division at the Mudra
Institute of Communications
Research, Ahmedabad,
India. Subhadip Roy is an
Assistant Professor at IBS
Hyderabad, Hyderabad,
India. Aarzoo Daswani and
Mari Sudha are both
Research Associates at the
Mudra Institute of
Communications Research,
Ahmedabad, India.
Received: July 2010Revised: January 2011Accepted: February 2011
![Page 3: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Similarly, animated films and television have generated a great deal of interest in fictional
characters. As a result these fictional celebrities have featured in variety of products,
including high-priced products. This is done by the licensing of fictional celebrities by
various companies to extract the benefit of these established characters (Callcott and Lee,
1994). The advantages of licensing fictional celebrities as endorsers includes effective
communication of the brand ethos, expanding the product portfolio, increasing brand s
awareness, giving easy entry to new markets and building brand equity while retaining
brand loyalty. Additionally, other advantages include more scope of creativity, flexibility and
cost-effectiveness (Bhatia and Puri, 2007). Also, fictional celebrities bring more enjoyment
than a normal testimonial in advertisements (Bhushan and Philip, 2009). The use of a fictional
celebrity endorser is the fastest approach to making serious money as it brings with it the
prospect to drive into new revenue streams (Sanghari, 2008).
The effect of celebrity endorsement is such that young consumers are more likely to use
products endorsed by them as celebrities mould their consumption (Chan and Prendergast,
2008). Martin and Bush (2000) noted that teenagers were influenced by entertainers and
athletes who were elevated to role-model status by the highly media saturated atmosphere.
Not only do they compare themselves with celebrities but also speak as if they shared a
‘‘real’’ relationship with them.
With about 115.3 million teenagers, India has the largest teenage population in the world. In
a decade, they will represent the largest percentage of the population in India
(NRIFinanceGuide.com, 2008). A survey commissioned by the Associated Chambers of
Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham) found that the average monthly allowance of
urban Indian children aged 10-17 years is Rs. 1,300 ($US26) (Ghosh, 2008). The teenage
years are also the first phase of their life in which they feel they are taking informed decisions
about the brands they purchase (Dougall et al., 1999).
Usually, while bidding to get a slice of the teenagemarket, marketers often make the mistake
of considering all kids within a certain age group to be more or less the same and extend the
same treatment to this segment (Geraci et al., 2000). This generates the need to focus on
knowing the exact attitude and behavior of this ever-on-the-move generation towards
advertisements featuring real and fictional celebrity.
2. Literature review
Celebrities are known for being extremely good at something beyond appearing in
advertisements, and their outstanding skill in their respective fields brings them into the
public eye and makes them objects of veneration and respect (Pringle, 2004). Celebrity
endorsement effectiveness has been tested by many researchers in the past, and many
theories and models have been built. The theories include source credibility (Ohanian,
1990), source attractiveness (McGuire, 1985), match-up hypothesis (Till and Busler, 2000)
and the meaning transfer model (McCracken, 1989). Source effect models highlight the
characteristics of the source or the message sender and its effect on the receiver. The
source credibility model identifies source expertise, trustworthiness and attractiveness as
key components. The source attractiveness model examines similarity, familiarity and
likeability as key components. The match-up hypothesis suggests that the effectiveness of
celebrity endorsement depends on the existence of a ‘‘fit’’ between the celebrity endorser
and the endorsed brand. The meaning transfer model consists of three stages wherein firstly
the celebrity image is formed, secondly this celebrity image transfers to the product and
finally from the product to the consumers.
The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) reveals an interaction between involvement level
and type of endorser. Under low-involvement conditions, the type of endorser has a
significant impact on attitudes towards the product but no impact on behavioral intentions.
The type of endorser manipulation found that celebrities had marginally significant impact
on brand recall over ordinary people (Petty et al., 1983). Celebrity endorsers are more
effective than non-celebrity endorsers in generating attitudes towards advertisement,
attitude towards brand and purchase intentions (Erdogan, 1999). Kahle and Homer (1985)
PAGE 172 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011
![Page 4: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
found that an attractive celebrity created more favorable purchase intention as compared to
an unattractive one.
Furthermore, while trying to explore studies related to teenager perception and impact of
celebrity endorsement advertisements, it appears that the exposure to mass media is quite
large, as 89 percent and 91 percent of teenagers respectively watch television and movies
regularly (NRIFinanceGuide.com, 2008). As a result, teenagers select media figures as their
role models based on the characteristics that they can identify themselves with (Martin and
Bush, 2000). Young people admire their icons and stars that are dependable (McGowan,
2000). They are attached to brands endorsed by their icon celebrity and aspire to adopt their
image and lifestyle (Martin and Bush, 2000; Thomson and Woodham, 1997). The brand is
referred as a ‘‘cool brand’’ among teenagers when a cool celebrity uses it (Martin and Bush,
2000). Teenagers state that when entertainers endorse the products, then the chances of
using the product increase (Chan and Prendergast, 2008). When teenagers attach to a
likable product, there is a high chance of them being involved in its purchase decision
process (Beatty and Talpade, 1994). Brands in the entertainment, food and clothing areas
are major interests among children (Pecheux and Derbaix, 1999).
Erdogan (1999) found that the possibility of teenagers shopping with their parents
decreases as their age increases. Teenagers are future adults and have buying power and
influence over family purchases. They tend to spend more freely on less expensive products
that are especially for their own use and are within their buying limits (Foxman et al., 1989).
Apart from making decisions pertaining to products for their own use, the teenage
population influences many of parental product and brand choices (Foxman et al., 1989;
Erdogan, 1999). Talpade and Trilokekar-Talpade (1995) reveal that teenagers are involved
from the very initial stage of bringing up the idea of buying a product to the decision stage of
buying the product from a store. This increased influence is observed for a variety of
products, ranging from chewing gum to a new car or vacations and travel (Foxman et al.,
1989; Geraci et al., 2000). The influence stems from being better informed than their parents,
so they can enjoy the status of an advisor or consultant to the parents (Christensen and
Rohde, 1999).
Prior research relating to the effectiveness of fictional celebrity endorsers was studied. A
study examining the influence of an animated spokes-character on preschoolers suggests
that animated spokes-characters generate high levels of attention, character recognition
and liking and product recognition and liking. However, these high levels of recognition and
liking did not transfer to product preference, intention or choice (Neeley and Schumann,
2004). Callcott and Lee (1994), in their content analysis of animated spokes-characters in
television commercials, revealed that celebrity spokes-persons appeared more popular for
adult-oriented durable or service products.
With fewer studies dealing in teenagers’ behaviors, attitudes and buying patterns towards
advertisements featuring human and fictional celebrities in different product categories, the
present study tries to find the same, along with the reasons for favoring such advertisement.
The study is insightful, as young people are considered to be innovative, energetic, flexible,
positive, friendly and knowledgeable. Their behavior and thinking is normally different, and it
is difficult to convince them to pursue a product (Byfield, 2002). Thus the following
hypotheses were formulated:
H1. A human celebrity has a more favorable impact on consumer attitudes (i.e. attitude
towards the advertisement, towards the brand and purchase intention) than a
fictional celebrity in the case of a food product.
H2. A human celebrity has a more favorable impact on consumer attitudes (i.e. attitude
towards the advertisement, towards the brand and purchase intention) than a
fictional celebrity in the case of a non-food low-involvement product.
H3. A human celebrity has a more favorable impact on the consumer attitudes (i.e.
attitude towards the advertisement, towards the brand and purchase intention)
than a fictional celebrity in the case of a non-food high-involvement product.
VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj PAGE 173
![Page 5: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3. Methodology
3.1 Design of the study
Experimental design was the selected methodology given the nature of the study objectives.
The three product categories included food products, non-food low involvement products
and non-food high involvement products and the three endorsers consisted of a fictional
celebrity, human celebrity and no endorser as the control group. Thus the experimental set
up was a 3 £ 3 full factorial design. The product category had three levels (i.e.
low-involvement food, low-involvement non-food and high-involvement non-food). The
endorser had three levels (i.e. fictional celebrity, human celebrity and control without an
endorser).
3.2 Variables and measures
The independent variables used in the study were the celebrities and the product and
dependent variables were consumer attitudes, namely attitude towards the advertisement
(AAD), attitude towards the brand (AB) and purchase intention (PI).
3.3 Pre-test
The selection of the levels of the independent variables required a pre-test. Pre-tests were
conducted on batches of 60 students of standard ninth and 12th (age ranging between 13
and 17, years respectively), in order to know their preferred products and celebrities. The
first pre-test was conducted to identify the human and the fictional celebrity. This was
conducted on two separate but homogenous groups of sizes around 40 individuals. An
opening brief was followed by a single open-ended question which asked, ‘‘Which
celebrity/fictional character would you most like to watch in an advertisement?’’. The most
preferred human celebrity was Aamir Khan (Hindi movie actor with 87 percent of votes) and
the most preferred fictional character was found to be Mickey Mouse (89 percent of votes).
Pre-test 2 was conducted to identify the products to be used in the study. This was
conducted on a single group of around 40 respondents. The results suggested that for food
products the respondents preferred chocolate; for non-food products they preferred
shampoo (low-involvement) and television (high-involvement).
3.4 Treatments
From the pre-test results, nine treatments were operationalized, with the identified three
product categories and three endorsers. Nine print advertisements were prepared with
fictitious brand names and punch lines. In the human celebrity and the fictional celebrity
conditions, the celebrities selected from the pre-test were put in the ad alongside the
product and the punch lines were adjusted accordingly. The three ads of the control group
had only the product and the punch line. Print advertisements were chosen as the treatment,
for two reasons. Firstly, it was not possible to create fictitious video advertisements using a
celebrity endorser because of cost and production difficulties. Secondly, it was feasible to
use a print advertisement as a treatment, since it could be attached as a supplement in the
questionnaire developed to collect responses. Once completed, the advertisements were
shown to three advertising practitioners to check that the fictitious advertisements looked
natural.
3.5 Questionnaire design
In the final study, nine separate questionnaires were designed. The basic pattern of the
questionnaire remained the same with minor changes according to the treatment. The
questionnaire opened with a brief about a celebrity management group that had roped in a
celebrity for endorsement activities. The brief continued with a note about the product brand
for which the company would use the celebrity as endorser. The brief added that it had come
up with an advertisement but was not sure about the impact of the advertisement. This
followed with questions pertaining to the attitude of the respondent towards the
advertisement and also probed into the reasons for liking. Similarly pages 3 and 4 had
questions pertaining to the attitude of the respondents towards the brand and their purchase
PAGE 174 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011
![Page 6: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
intention, respectively. Further there were questions related to the likeability of the celebrity.
Finally, the last few questions pertained to the demographic factors like age and gender.
3.6 Sample profile and data collection
A total of 15 schools with English as the medium of instruction were approached (as the
language used in the advertisements and the questionnaires was English) in Western India,
of which seven agreed to participate in the research study. Students from the eighth
standard to the 12th standard were considered as they fell in the age group of 13-17 years.
The questionnaires were administered to 418 teenagers and of those 378 respondents were
retained as usable responses. The response rate of the teenagers (respondents) was 90
percent. The number of girls and boys was 177 and 201, respectively.
3.7 The experiment
The experiment was conducted in the following manner. The researcher gave a brief to the
students about the study. Next, questionnaires were distributed along with the
advertisements in the class. In every class three sets of questionnaires along with the
relevant advertisement were circulated and administered, under the supervision of two
researchers. It was also ensured that each student spent five to ten minutes in observing the
advertisement and 15 to 20 minutes in filling up the questionnaire. The researcher ensured
that the questionnaires were completely filled before collecting them back.
4. Data analysis and results
A 3 £ 3 product involvement by celebrity endorsement factorial design was analyzed using
SPSS MANOVA procedure. It was found that the dependent variables (AAD, AB and PI)
were significantly correlated to each other (rAAD;AB ¼ 0:578, p ¼ 0:000, rAB;PI ¼ 0:540,
p ¼ 0:000, rAAD;PI ¼ 0:447, p ¼ 0:000), which necessitated the use of MANOVA to control for
Type I error.
The scores of dependent variables – i.e. attitude towards advertisement (AAD), attitude
towards brand (AB) and purchase intention (PI) – were calculated from multi-item scales
given in the questionnaire before running multivariate analysis. The group means for all the
dependent variables in each treatment group are given in Table I.
Before the MANOVA was run, Box’s M test for homogeneity of covariance matrices was run.
The M statistic was found to be 190.9 and the corresponding F statistic (3.859) was
significant at the 5 percent level. However, the literature (Stevens, 2002; Timm, 2002) has
suggested that Box’s M is very sensitive to sample size and normality of the data and thus
the authors decided to go ahead with the MANOVA. The MANOVA effect results (Table II)
(determined here through Pillai’s trace) for both the independent variables were significant,
with F values for celebrity of 5.027 and for product of 4.536. The interesting finding was that
of a significant interaction effect (F value 1.945); that is, both independent variables of
celebrity and product jointly influenced the set of correlated dependent variables.
Table I Group means: dependent variables (AAD, AB and PI)
Product category/endorser Fictional celebrity Human celebrity No endorser
Low-involvement (food) Treatment 1 2.04 Treatment 2 2.38 Treatment 3 2.172.20 2.68 2.442.04 2.80 2.02
Low-involvement (Non-food) Treatment 4 2.24 Treatment 5 2.83 Treatment 6 2.372.67 3.18 2.612.79 3.05 2.18
High-involvement (non-food) Treatment 7 2.33 Treatment 8 2.17 Treatment 9 2.792.37 2.38 2.632.80 2.68 2.67
VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj PAGE 175
![Page 7: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Next, the MANOVA result was subjected to further tests in order to examine the effect of the
independent variables on each dependent variable. Table III provides the effects of
independent variables on each dependent variable respectively. The results indicated that
both the independent variables had a significant main effect on AB and PI at the 5 percent
level of significance. However, both independent variables were not found to have a
significant effect on AAD at the 5 percent level. The celebrity £ product interaction effect was
found to be significant on dependent variables AAD and PI but not on dependent variable
AB at the 5 percent level of significance (see Table III).
To test for the three hypotheses stated earlier, the post-hoc Bonferroni tests of mean
comparison was used along with graphs of marginal means. The results of the post hoc tests
have been presented in three sub sections, each one dedicated to a particular dependent
variable.
4.1 Attitude towards advertisement (AAD)
The post hoc tests for AAD supported the findings in Table III. There was no statistically
significant difference in AAD across the categories of the celebrity (mean difference:
human, fictional ¼ 0:3218, p ¼ 0:091; human, control ¼ 0:0198, p ¼ 1:000; fictional,
control ¼ 20:3019, p ¼ 0:126) or the products (mean difference: low-involvement
food, low-involvement non–food ¼ 20:2842, p ¼ 0:085; low-involvement food,
high-involvement¼20.2842, p ¼ 0:217; low-involvement non-food, high-involvement ¼
0.0516, p ¼ 1:000). However, analysis of the profile plot of the marginal means indicated the
presence of interaction effect among the independent variables (Figure 1). The human
celebrity was found to have a favorable impact on the attitude towards the advertisement
than the fictional celebrity and control group for the food product (chocolate) and the
non-food low-involvement product (shampoo). However, in case of the high involvement
product (LCD TV), the control group mean of 2.79 was higher than that of both celebrities
(human and fictional).
4.2 Attitude towards the Brand (AB)
The post hoc tests for AB also supported the findings in Table III. There was no statistically
significant difference in AB across the categories of the celebrity (mean difference:
human, fictional ¼ 0.3123, p ¼ 0.118; human, control ¼ 0.1851, p ¼ 0.511; fictional,
Table II MANOVA results: main and interaction effects
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Significance
Celebrity 0.079 5.027 6.000 734.000 0.000Product 0.072 4.536 6.000 734.000 0.000Celebrity £ Product 0.062 1.945 12.000 1104.000 0.026
Note: Design: Interceptþ Celebrityþ Productþ Celebrity £ Product
Table III MANOVA results: main and interaction effects on each dependent variable
Source Dependent variable Type III sum of squares df M square F Significance
Celebrity AAD 5.152 2 2.576 2.468 0.086AB 7.154 2 3.577 3.347 0.036PI 19.472 2 9.736 9.415 0.000
Product AAD 5.799 2 2.900 2.778 0.063AB 11.645 2 5.823 5.448 0.005PI 13.958 2 6.979 6.749 0.001
Celebrity £ Product AAD 14.198 4 3.549 3.400 0.010AB 7.794 4 1.949 1.823 0.124PI 14.650 4 3.663 3.542 0.007
PAGE 176 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011
![Page 8: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
control ¼ 20.1272, p ¼ 1.000). In case of the product, there was a significant difference in
attitudes across chocolate and shampoo and shampoo and TV (mean difference:
low-involvement food, low-involvement non–food ¼ 20:3801, p ¼ 0:011; low-involvement
food, high involvement ¼ 20:0177, p ¼ 1:000; low-involvement non-food, high
involvement ¼ 0:3624, p ¼ 0:017). However, even in this case, analysis of the profile plots
of the marginal means indicated the presence of an interaction effect among the
independent variables (Figure 2). The human celebrity was found to have a more favorable
impact on the attitude towards the brand than the fictional celebrity and control group for the
food product (chocolate) and the non-food low-involvement product (shampoo). Similar to
the previous case, the control group mean was the highest for the high involvement product
(LCD TV).
4.3 Purchase intention (PI)
The post hoc tests for PI suggested that there was a significant difference in the Purchase
Intentions across the celebrity and the product categories. Whereas the human celebrity
generated significantly higher purchase intentions than both the fictional celebrity and the
control, there was no significant difference between the purchase intention levels of the
fictional celebrity and the control group (mean difference: human, fictional ¼ 0:4196,
p ¼ 0:012; human, control ¼ 0:5556, p ¼ 0:000; fictional, control ¼ 0:1361, p ¼ 1:000). In
the case of the product, significant differences were observed between the food and
non-food (both high and low involvement) product categories (mean difference:
low-involvement food, low-involvement non–food ¼ 20:3840, p ¼ 0:009; low-involvement
food, high–involvement ¼ 20:4263, p ¼ 0:003; low-involvement non-food,
high–involvement ¼ 0:0423, p ¼ 1:000). Further observations of the marginal means
suggested that the human celebrity had a more favorable impact on the purchase intention
of the non-food low-involvement (shampoo) and the food product (chocolate) than the
fictional celebrity and control group for food product (see Figure 3). However, in case of the
high-involvement product (TV) the marginal means of all three levels were close to each
other.
Figure 1 Profile plot 1. Dependent variable: AAD; independent variables: celebrity and
product
VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj PAGE 177
![Page 9: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Figure 2 Profile plot 2. Dependent variable: AB; independent variables: celebrity and
product
Figure 3 Profile plot 3. Dependent variable: PI; independent variables: celebrity and
product
PAGE 178 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011
![Page 10: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
4.4 Evidence for H1
From Table IV it is evident that all the consumer attitudes were higher for the human celebrity
than the animated one or the control in case of the food product, i.e. chocolate. The highest
positive consumer attitude was achieved for the variable ‘‘purchase intention’’ for Aamir
Khan, the human celebrity (2.802). In all cases, the control (i.e. no celebrity) had the least
favorable consumer attitudes. The MANOVA results (represented by the significant F
statistic) supported the claim that the means for all the dependent variables across the
categories of independent variables were significantly different from each other. This was
further supported by the post hoc tests, where most of the post hoc differences were
significant, suggesting a difference of effects because of the character used. Thus H1 was
supported.
4.5 Evidence for H2
From Table V it becomes evident that all the consumer attitudes were higher for the human
celebrity than the animated one or the control in case of non-food low involvement product,
i.e. shampoo. The highest positive consumer attitude was achieved for the variable attitude
towards brand for Aamir Khan, the human celebrity (3.183). The MANOVA results in Table V
(represented by the significant F statistic) here also support the claim that the means for all
the dependent variables across the categories of independent variables were significantly
different from each other. This was further supported by the post hoc tests, where most of the
post hoc differences were significant suggesting a difference of effects because of the
character used. Thus, H2 was supported.
4.6 Evidence for H3
From Table VI it becomes evident that all the consumer attitudes were higher for the control
than the human and fictional celebrity in the case of the non-food high-involvement product,
i.e. television. The highest positive variable that was achieved was for the purchase intention
(2.802) for fictional celebrity; however, consumers’ attitudes were more inclined toward the
Table IV Product £ character means for food product (chocolate)
MANOVA resultsDependent variable Product Character Mean Pillai’s trace F statistic Significance
AAD Chocolate Aamir Khan 2.381 0.158 3.070 0.007Mickey 2.037Control 2.167
AB Chocolate Aamir Khan 2.675Mickey 2.195Control 2.444
PI Chocolate Aamir Khan 2.802Mickey 2.041Control 2.016
Table V Product £ character means for non-food low-involvement product (shampoo)
MANOVA resultsDependent variable Product Character Mean Pillai’s trace F statistic Significance
AAD Shampoo Aamir Khan 2.833 0.161 3.561 0.002Mickey 2.238Control 2.369
AB Shampoo Aamir Khan 3.183Mickey 2.667Control 2.611
PI Shampoo Aamir Khan 3.048Mickey 2.794Control 2.175
VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj PAGE 179
![Page 11: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
control. This means that a fictional celebrity may work for a non-food high-involvement
product but consumers need detailed information about the product. The related MANOVA
results given in Table VI, however, were different from those for H1 and H2. As well as this, the
post hoc tests were not found to be significant, implying that there was no significant
difference in the means of the dependent variables because of the character. Thus, H3 was
not supported.
5. Discussion
The most important finding of the study is that a celebrity may not be the only reason behind
favorable consumer attitudes for any product category. The findings of the study broadly
suggest that human celebrity has a favorable impact on the attitude of teenagers towards
brand and advertisements of food and non-food low-involvement products, which is
supported by the literature (Neeley and Schumann, 2004). In the case of the food product,
the human celebrity created the most favorable impact on the consumer attitudes, namely
AAD, AB and PI. This finding supports the literature on celebrity endorsements, which found
a celebrity to be an effective mode of marketing communication (Erdogan, 1999). In case of
the non-food low-involvement product, the human celebrity was found have a major impact
on consumer attitudes. In this case, the product was a style-enhancing product, and
according to the literature (Martin and Bush, 2000; McGowan, 2000) teenagers are
influenced by celebrities, who they consider to be style icons. In the case of the
high-involvement product the human celebrity was not found to create favorable consumer
attitudes. This may have happened because consumers require more knowledge about a
high-involvement product before they make a purchase decision, and they are not easily
influenced by an advertisement (Byfield, 2002). In fact, the control group had highest means
for AAD and AB in case of the high-involvement product. Thus there was support for H1 and
H2, but H3 was not supported by the findings. The study further suggests that teenagers
think logically about products and accordingly develop intentions to purchase it; they also
prefer ads to carry new features and new technology about the product rather than just the
presence of a celebrity endorser. The finding also supports the elaboration likelihood model,
which suggests that in the high-involvement condition, having a celebrity in an
advertisement may not be sufficient to create positive consumer attitudes (Petty et al.,
1983). Thus, advertisements need to highlight the key features or attributes of the product
clearly. However, in both low and high product categories teenagers desire the product
design and layout to be new and creative. Therefore, advertising appeals or messages need
to be designed according to their preference for different product categories to have a high
impact.
6. Managerial implications
For managers, the first lesson from the current study is that indiscriminate use of a celebrity
is not a good strategy. A human celebrity may not be good for promoting all product
categories. Thus, by being selective about a celebrity endorsement, managers may be able
Table VI Product £ character means for non-food high-involvement product (TV)
MANOVA resultsDependent variable Product Character Mean SE Pillai’s trace F statistic Significance
AAD TV Aamir Khan 2.167 0.158 0.096 2.051 0.060Mickey 2.333 0.158Control 2.786 0.158
AB TV Aamir Khan 2.381 0.160Mickey 2.365 0.160Control 2.627 0.160
PI TV Aamir Khan 2.675 0.157Mickey 2.802 0.157Control 2.667 0.157
PAGE 180 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011
![Page 12: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
to create more effective communication and at the same time save some expenditure.
Secondly, the study also pointed to the fact that a human celebrity may not be more effective
than a fictional celebrity/character in creating a favorable consumer attitude. In cases where
a fictional celebrity/character is popular and is less costly to acquire, the marketer should go
for this option, as it would generate the same positive response as the human celebrity.
Lastly, the product category would have an important role in determining which
spokesperson to use or in fact whether to use one at all. In case of an aspiration-oriented
product, such as a shampoo, consumers may be wooed by a human celebrity since the
consumers look up at him/her as a role model and would like to appear/dress up as him/her.
However, where a product is high-involvement and requires information-seeking from
consumers, using a spokes-character may not turn out to be a successful strategy. The
marketer should rather focus on the product’s features and properly inform the target
audience of them. This too would be less costly. To summarize, our study points out that
there may not be a single successful strategy when it comes to the use of spokes-characters
in advertising. The product category as well as the objective of the marketer will interact to
determine the right strategy.
7. Conclusion and limitations
The objective of the study was substantially supported by the findings. The study suggests
that for food and non-food low-involvement product categories, the impact of a human
celebrity is greater than that of a fictional celebrity. Regarding the purchase intention of
teenagers, it was found that a human celebrity is more effective than a fictional celebrity in
food and non-food low involvement products but a fictional celebrity may have more impact
in the case of high-involvement products. In future, teenagers would like to see human
celebrities in advertisements of low-involvement products because they are attractive and
the teenagers can also easily relate themselves with these celebrity, thus in a way they have
a fair share of being in sync with the latest trends. However, a more detailed depth interview
trying to find out what the consumers look for in an endorsement, and how they differ
depending on the spokes-character (celebrity/fictional character) could provide a future
research direction.
This study used only one medium for the research work, i.e. print. Television could also be
used and a similar study could be conducted. The study could be extended by determining
the effectiveness of celebrities in service brands. The emotional appeal attached to
celebrities among teenagers and simultaneously its effect on product performance can be
derived. Lastly, the same study could be extended and applied to international celebrities for
audiences in the Indian region.
References
Beatty, S.E. and Talpade, S. (1994), ‘‘Adolescent influence in family decision making: a replication with
extension’’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 332-41.
Bhatia, P. and Puri, M. (2007), ‘‘Animated characters becoming face of brands’’, The Economic Times,
November 26, p. 1.
Bhushan, R. and Philip, T.J. (2009), ‘‘Bollywood stars less than animated in ad world’’, The Economic
Times, July 27, p. 1.
Byfield, S. (2002), ‘‘Snapshots of youth: the lives of late teens across the world’’, Young Consumers,
Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 15-20.
Callcott, M.F. and Lee, W. (1994), ‘‘A content analysis of animation and animated spokes-characters in
television commercials’’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 1-11.
Challapalli, S. (2007), ‘‘So, who’s a right celebrity to use?’’, available at: http://220.225.146.34/cgi-bin/
wwwi32.exe/[in ¼ genisis0.in]/ (accessed January 16, 2009).
Chan, K. and Prendergast, G.P. (2008), ‘‘Social comparison, imitation of celebrity models and
materialism among Chinese youth’’, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 799-826.
VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj PAGE 181
![Page 13: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Christensen, O. and Rohde, C.C. (1999), ‘‘Understanding youth: their culture and language results from
qualitative and quantitative tracting studies among young European opinion leaders’’, ESOMAR Youth
Power, Beijing, October.
Dougall, P., Marienberg, R. and Fraser, N. (1999), ‘‘Experiencing the emotional world of kids and
teenagers through their eyes’’, ESOMAR Youth Power, Beijing, October.
Erdogan, B.Z. (1999), ‘‘Celebrity endorsement: a literature review’’, Journal of Marketing Management,
Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 291-314.
Erdogan, B.Z. (2005), ‘‘Reasons for using celebrity endorsement’’, Admap, No. 459, March.
Foxman, E.R., Tansuhaj, P. and Ekstrom, K. (1989), ‘‘Family members’ perceptions of adolescents’
influence in family decision making’’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, pp. 482-91.
Geraci, J., Silsbee, P., Fauth, S. and Campbell, J. (2000), ‘‘Understanding youth’’, ESOMAR Reinventing
Advertising, Rio de Janeiro, November.
Ghosh, A. (2008), ‘‘Delhi kids pocket Rs. 1,800 per month’’, The Times of India, available at: http://
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-2962852,prtpage-1.cms (accessed March 13, 2009).
Kahle, L.R. and Homer, P.M. (1985), ‘‘Physical attractiveness of celebrity endorser: a social adaptation
perspective’’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11, pp. 954-61.
Kaikati, J.G. (1987), ‘‘Celebrity advertising: a review and synthesis’’, International Journal of Advertising,
Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 93-105.
Leather, P., McKechnie, S. and Amirkhanian, M. (1994), ‘‘The importance of likeability as a measure of
advertising effectiveness’’, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 265-80.
McCracken, G. (1989), ‘‘Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement
process’’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 310-21.
McGowan, P. (2000), ‘‘All the young dudes: uncovering new youth’’, Admap, November.
McGuire, W.J. (1985), ‘‘Attitudes and attitude change’’, in Lindzey, G. and Elliot, A. (Eds), The Handbook
of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 233-346.
Martin, C.A. and Bush, A.J. (2000), ‘‘Do role models influence teenagers’ purchase intentions and
behavior?’’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 441-54.
Neeley, S.M. and Schumann, D.W. (2004), ‘‘Using animated spokes-characters in advertising to young
children’’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 7-23.
NRIFinanceGuide.com (2008), ‘‘Why should investors start investing in Indian financial markets?
Cover Story!!’’, available at: http://nrifinanceguide.com/2008/08/08/why-should-investors-start-
investing-in-indian-financial-markets-cover-story/ (accessed 16 March 2009).
Ohanian, R. (1990), ‘‘Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived
expertise’’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 39-52.
Pecheux, C. and Derbaix, C. (1999), ‘‘Children and attitude toward the brand: a new measurement
scale’’, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 19-27.
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. and Schuman, D. (1983), ‘‘Central and peripheral routes to advertising
effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement’’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, pp. 135-46.
Pringle, H. (2004), Celebrity Sells, Wiley, Chichester.
Sanghari, R. (2008), ‘‘Licensing – no kids’ play’’, available at: www.animationxpress.com/anex/y2k8/
headlines/anex4200.htm (accessed March 19, 2009).
Saxena, R. (2008), ‘‘It’s not working’’, Business Standard, The Strategist, April 22, p. 1.
Stevens, J.P. (2002), Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 4th ed., Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Talpade, S. and Trilokekar-Talpade, M. (1995), ‘‘Development of a multi-item scale to measure teenager
influence on family purchase decisions: an exploratory study’’, Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice,
Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 41-56.
Thomson, S. and Woodham, G. (1997), ‘‘Myths and realities of the global young consumer’’, ESOMAR
Youth Marketing, Copenhagen.
PAGE 182 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011
![Page 14: What Really[1]](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081809/553f86094a7959f8128b4784/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Till, D.B. and Busler, M. (2000), ‘‘The match-up hypothesis: physical attractiveness, expertise, and the
role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs’’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29 No. 3,
pp. 1-13.
Timm, N.H. (2002), Applied Multivariate Analysis, Springer, New York, NY.
About the authors
Varsha Jain is a Research Fellow and Division Head of Integrated MarketingCommunications at the Mudra Institute of Communications Research in Ahmedabad.Currently, her research is focused on branding and celebrity endorsements inadvertisements. She has presented her research at international conferences, forexample, the Asian Media Information and Communication Center (AMIC, Singapore),and has publications in international and national journals and book chapters to her credit.Varsha Jain is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: [email protected]
Subhadip Roy is an Assistant Professor at the ICFAI Business School, Hyderabad. Hereceived his PhD from ICFAI University, Dehradun. His research interests are in the areas ofbrand management, advertising and market research.
Aarzoo Daswani is a Research Associate in the Department of Integrated MarketingCommunication (IMC) at Mudra Institute of Communication Research, Ahmedabad, India.She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Information Technology from the K.S. School of BusinessManagement, and a Postgraduate Diploma in Marketing from the Som Lalit Institute ofBusiness Management, Ahmedabad, India. Her research interests include advertisingcommunication and consumer behavior.
Mari Sudha serves as a Research Associate in the Department of Integrated MarketingCommunication (IMC) at Mudra Institute of Communication Research (MICORE),Ahmedabad, India. She holds Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Statistics from StXavier’s College, Ahmedabad and the School of Sciences, Ahmedabad, respectively. Herresearch interests include operational research, applied statistics, social network analysisand culture and advertising communication.
VOL. 12 NO. 2 2011 jYOUNG CONSUMERSj PAGE 183
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: [email protected]
Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints