Reflections on Poverty Reduction in China REFLECTIONS ON ...
What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project
-
Upload
elisabeth-lex -
Category
Science
-
view
218 -
download
2
description
Transcript of What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project
Knowledge Technologies Institute
1
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project
Elisabeth Lex
Univ. Ass. Knowledge Technologies Institute
Graz University of Technology, Austria
e-mail: [email protected]: http://elisabethlex.info
Knowledge Technologies Institute
2
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Overview
Interdisciplinary project Smart Pharma
We combined • pharmaceutical engineering• computer science • psychology
to develop a collaborative pharmaceutical knowledge management system that fits the needs of pharmaceutical engineers
Knowledge Technologies Institute
3
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Our Approach
• We used Bronstein's model of interdisciplinary collaboration• Describes components of
optimal collaboration• Domain Independent • Strong practical side
Knowledge Technologies Institute
4
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Real World Setting: Smart Pharma
• Knowledge generated from large pool of scientific articles, lab reports, package inserts,..• Computer scientists: Data mining/Visual Analytics for analysis of
scientic publications and research data• Algorithms tailored towards pharmaceutical domain with help of
pharmaceutical engineers
• Knowledge about pharmaceutical processes was transformed into domain and process models• Psychologist: Expert in modelling, process construction and on how to
design a wiki for collaborative knowledge construction.• Pharmaceutical engineer: Domain expert
• Constant validation and feedback: all
Knowledge Technologies Institute
5
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Implementation 1/2
• Start: Series of face-to-face kick-off meetings• Then: collaborators reflected and discussed about
the offers separately and met again with new proposals and ideas Iterative, multistage step, helped develop shared understanding
and common goal
• Agreement on common project target and outcome Leads to collective ownership of project goals, complementary
subtasks and responsibilities, i.e. interdependence in Bronstein's model
We organized common workshop SmartPharma at www.i-know.tugraz.at conference, industrial track
Knowledge Technologies Institute
6
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Implementation 2/2
• Two types of interdisciplinary tasks: • Single-discipline tasks tackled in cooperative manner, e.g.
software development or preparation of domain specic process data (interdependence component of Bronstein's model)
• Tasks in collaborative manner, i.e. tasks whose fullment relies on the complementary skill of the disciplines.
• Collaborative tasks tackled by smaller focus teams flexibility and newly created professional activities component. Iterative sharing of domain knowledge (reflection on process,
flexibility and collective ownership of goals) Interdisciplinary trainings
Knowledge Technologies Institute
7
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Challenges
• Collaborative tasks require lot of communication, face-to-face time to sit and work together and willingness to learn from each other
• Willingness to share (domain) knowledge: knowledge means market advantage
• Finding the right tool for communication• Finding a common language between people from
different domains• Setting priorities: strategies for the appreciation of
interdisciplinary projects required
Knowledge Technologies Institute
8
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Lessons Learned
• Bronstein‘s model fits: its components have to be used for the right task: interdependence for cooperative phases
• Collective ownershop of goals and newly created professional activities for collaborative phases
• Reflection on the process and flexibility essential for both collaborative and cooperative phases
• Extension of the model: • interdisciplinary trainings• use of suitable tools and technologies for communication and to
manage goals and expectations• shared knowledge about the situation, methods and operators
Knowledge Technologies Institute
9
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Our (interdisciplinary) team
Elisabeth Lex Peter Kraker Sebastian [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]