What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

9
Knowledge Technologies Institute 1 Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014 What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project Elisabeth Lex Univ. Ass. Knowledge Technologies Institute Graz University of Technology, Austria e-mail: [email protected] web: http://elisabethlex.info

description

 

Transcript of What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Page 1: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

1

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Elisabeth Lex

Univ. Ass. Knowledge Technologies Institute

Graz University of Technology, Austria

e-mail: [email protected]: http://elisabethlex.info

Page 2: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

2

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Overview

Interdisciplinary project Smart Pharma

We combined • pharmaceutical engineering• computer science • psychology

to develop a collaborative pharmaceutical knowledge management system that fits the needs of pharmaceutical engineers

Page 3: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

3

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Our Approach

• We used Bronstein's model of interdisciplinary collaboration• Describes components of

optimal collaboration• Domain Independent • Strong practical side

Page 4: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

4

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Real World Setting: Smart Pharma

• Knowledge generated from large pool of scientific articles, lab reports, package inserts,..• Computer scientists: Data mining/Visual Analytics for analysis of

scientic publications and research data• Algorithms tailored towards pharmaceutical domain with help of

pharmaceutical engineers

• Knowledge about pharmaceutical processes was transformed into domain and process models• Psychologist: Expert in modelling, process construction and on how to

design a wiki for collaborative knowledge construction.• Pharmaceutical engineer: Domain expert

• Constant validation and feedback: all

Page 5: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

5

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Implementation 1/2

• Start: Series of face-to-face kick-off meetings• Then: collaborators reflected and discussed about

the offers separately and met again with new proposals and ideas Iterative, multistage step, helped develop shared understanding

and common goal

• Agreement on common project target and outcome Leads to collective ownership of project goals, complementary

subtasks and responsibilities, i.e. interdependence in Bronstein's model

We organized common workshop SmartPharma at www.i-know.tugraz.at conference, industrial track

Page 6: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

6

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Implementation 2/2

• Two types of interdisciplinary tasks: • Single-discipline tasks tackled in cooperative manner, e.g.

software development or preparation of domain specic process data (interdependence component of Bronstein's model)

• Tasks in collaborative manner, i.e. tasks whose fullment relies on the complementary skill of the disciplines.

• Collaborative tasks tackled by smaller focus teams flexibility and newly created professional activities component. Iterative sharing of domain knowledge (reflection on process,

flexibility and collective ownership of goals) Interdisciplinary trainings

Page 7: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

7

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Challenges

• Collaborative tasks require lot of communication, face-to-face time to sit and work together and willingness to learn from each other

• Willingness to share (domain) knowledge: knowledge means market advantage

• Finding the right tool for communication• Finding a common language between people from

different domains• Setting priorities: strategies for the appreciation of

interdisciplinary projects required

Page 8: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

8

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Lessons Learned

• Bronstein‘s model fits: its components have to be used for the right task: interdependence for cooperative phases

• Collective ownershop of goals and newly created professional activities for collaborative phases

• Reflection on the process and flexibility essential for both collaborative and cooperative phases

• Extension of the model: • interdisciplinary trainings• use of suitable tools and technologies for communication and to

manage goals and expectations• shared knowledge about the situation, methods and operators

Page 9: What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project

Knowledge Technologies Institute

9

Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014

Our (interdisciplinary) team

Elisabeth Lex Peter Kraker Sebastian [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]