Federated Search at Green Gables (Federated Search: The Good and the Bad)
What is Metasearch? More than Federated Search –Federated Search –Local, Harvested Data...
-
Upload
gary-harper -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
2
Transcript of What is Metasearch? More than Federated Search –Federated Search –Local, Harvested Data...
What is Metasearch?
• More than Federated Search– Federated Search– Local, Harvested Data– Customizable– Flexible– Adjustable
What is Metasearch?
• The following 5 slides are borrowed from a presentation by David Walker (Cal St. San Marcos)
• http://smugnet.org/2005intl/Session-2-David-Walker.ppt
Data Layer
Application Layer
Presentation Layer
Typical Application
Data Layer
Application Layer
XML-based Application
Data Layer
Application Layer
XML layer
XML-based Application
Data Layer
Application Layer
XML layer
Custom Presentation Layer
What is the Metalib X-Server?
What is Metasearch?
• Metasearch is research and development of both:– Backend (Data Layer, Application Layer,
XML Layer)– User Interface (Custom Presentation
Layor)
• And more…
What is Metasearch?
• Much greater interface flexibility
• Increased ability to integrate with other systems
• New ability to add new services:– Spell checking / recommendations– Personal digital libraries– Citation management
Backend Features
• Standard API / Web Service Interface
• Ability to harvest and index metadata
• Relevancy ranking
• Search caching
• Use Data (comprehensive logging)
• More…
User Interfaces
• Backend standard API allows for many different user interfaces
• Initially developed interfaces– Oregon Explorer– Rochester– A9
• Future interfaces– Grokker-like– Others
• Ability to collaborate on interfaces with other libraries, like CDL, Uminn, NC State, etc.
Timeline
• First instance for public consumption available by March 15
• Anticipate new updates every six weeks in the first year (approximately 8 updates)
Activities within each 6 week cycle
• User testing / feedback (Usability group)
• Use data analysis (Project team)
• Feature / task prioritization (Project team)
• Programming / Development (Project team)
• Testing (non-user) (Project Team)
• New version moves into production (Library Tech)
ALL OF THESE TASKS ARE CONTINUOUS
W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12
Development Testing R Development Testing R
User Testing User Testing
Developm
ent Planning
Developm
ent Planning
Data Gathering (logs, etc.)
(R=Release)
Timeline for 2 six-week cycles
Resources
• Project Team– Jeremy, Terry, LSTA Programmer, Tami
Herlocker, Graduate Student, Ryan
• Usability Team– Members from Public Services / Reference
Services, Tami, Graduate Student
Resources
• Project Team– Jeremy: 50%– Terry: 25%– Tami: .5 FTE– GRA: .5 FTE– LSTA Programmer: 1 FTE
Resources
• Usability Team– 5 Members, including Tami and GRA– 3 Public Services Reps, .15 FTE each (5
hours/wk)