What is ich
-
Upload
grakbph040 -
Category
Documents
-
view
154 -
download
2
Transcript of What is ich
SUBMITTED BY
RESHMA FATHIMA.K
FIRST YEAR M.PHARM
DEPT OF PHARMACEUTICS
What is ICH?
ICH is a joint initiative involving both regulators and
research-based industry representatives of the EU, japan
and the US in scientific and technical discussions of the
testing procedures required to assess and ensure the
safety, quality and efficacy of medicines.
What does ICH stand for
The complete name of ICH is the “International
Conference on Harmonization of Technical
Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals
for Human Use”.
Aim :
The International Conference on Harmonisation of
Technical Requirements for the Registration of
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) was
established in 1990 as a joint regulatory/industry
project to improve, through harmonisation, the
efficiency of the process for developing and
registering new medicinal products in Europe,
Japan and the United States, in order to make these
products available to patients with a minimum of
delay.
ICH :
The International Conference on Harmonisation of
Technical Requirements for Registration of
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is a unique
project that brings together the regulatory
authorities of Europe, Japan and the United States
and experts from the pharmaceutical industry in the
three regions to discuss scientific and technical
aspects of product registration.
Purpose :
The objective of ICH is to increase international
harmonization of technical requirements to ensure
that safe, effective, and high quality medicines are
developed and registered in the most efficient and
cost effectivemanner
Objective :
The objective of such harmonisation is a more
economical use of human, animal and material
resources, and the elimination of unnecessary delay
in the global development and availability of new
medicines whilst maintaining safeguards on quality,
safety and efficacy, and regulatory obligations to
protect public health
Harmonising the technical content of the sections of
the reporting data where significant differences
have been identified between regulatory
requirements across the three regions: Europe,
Japan and the USA.
Steering Committee structure and participation :
The existing Steering Committee structure continues to be
appropriate. In the interests of greater transparency, the
Steering Committee, however, welcomes the appropriate
participation of other interested parties in a flexible and ad hoc
manner on topics which affect them.
Structure of ICH
ICH is a joint initiative involving both regulators and industry
as equal partners in the scientific and technical discussions
of the testing procedures which are required to ensure and
assess the safety, quality and efficacy of medicines.
The focus of ICH has been on the technical requirements for
medicinal products containing new drugs. The vast majority
of those new drugs and medicines are developed in Western
Europe, Japan and the United States of America.
The Observers are WHO, and Canada (represented by Health Canada).
This important group of non-voting members acts as a link between the
ICH and non-ICH countries and regions.
ICH is operated via the ICH Steering Committee, which is supported by
ICH Coordinators and the ICH Secretariat.
ICH PARTIES
EUROP
EAN
COMMI
SSION
/UNIO
N
EUROPEAN
FEDERATION
OF
PHARMACEU
TICAL
INDUSTRIES
AND
ASSOCIATION
MINIS
TRY
OF
HEAL
TH
LABO
UR
AND
WELF
ARE
JAPAN
PHARMACEUTIC
AL
MANUFACTURE
R ASSOCIATION
US FOOD
AND
DRUG
ADMINIS
TRATION
PHARMA
CEUTICA
L
RESEARC
H AND
MANUFAC
TURERS
OF
AMERICA
ICH Guidelines
The ICH Topics are divided into four major categories and ICH Topic Codes
are assigned according to these categories.
Stability
Q1A(R2) : Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products
Q1B : Stability Testing : Photostability Testing of New Drug
Substances and Products
Q1C : Stability Testing for New Dosage Forms
Q1D :Bracketing and Matrixing Designs for Stability Testing of
New Drug Substances and Products
Q1E : Evaluation of Stability Data
Q1F : Stability Data Package for Registration Applications in
Climatic Zones III and IV
Analytical Validation
Q2(R1) : New title: Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and
Methodology
Previously: Text on Validation of Analytical
Procedures Validation of Analytical Procedures:
Methodology (in Q2(R1))
Q3A(R2) : Impurities in New Drug Substances
Q3B(R2) : Impurities in New Drug Products
Q3C(R3) : Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents
Pharmacopoeias
Q4 : Pharmacopoeias
Q4A : Pharmacopoeial Harmonisation
Quality of Biotechnological Products
Q5A(R1) : Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products Derived
from Cell
Lines of Human or Animal Origin
Specifications
Q6A : Specifications : Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for
New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances
(including Decision Trees)
Q6B : Specifications : Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for
Biotechnological/Biological Products
Good Manufacturing Practice
Q7A : Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
Safety
Efficacy guidelines
Efficacy Topics
E3: Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports
E4: Dose-Response Information to Support Drug Registration
E6: Good Clinical Practice : Consolidated Guideline
E8: General Considerations for Clinical Trials
E9: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials
E10: Choice of Control Group and Related Issues in Clinical Trials
Multidisciplinary Guidelines
M1- MedDRA : Medical Terminology
M2- ESTRI : Electronic Standards for the Transfer of Regulatory
Information
M3- (R2) : Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human
Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals
M4- CTD : The Common Technical Document
M5 : Data Elements and Standards for Drug Dictionaries
What Does the FDA Regulate?
Food (with Agriculture Department)
Drugs
Biologics
Medical Devices
Cosmetics
Anything That Produces Dangerous
Radiation
25% of the Consumer Dollar
Prescription Drug Regulation
Good Old Days
In the Early 1900s You Could Get Anything
You Wanted
No Concern for People Poisoning Themselves
Few Effective Drugs
Limited Rationale for Physician Supervision
Harrison Narcotics Act
Heroin Was the Hero Drug Because It Saved
People From Morphine
Getting a Drug Approved
Isolate or Synthesize the Agent
Many are Biologicals Cyclosporin
Tamoxifen
Structure Activity Design
Genetic Engineering
Do Animal or in Vitro Studies to Determine
Activity
Apply for an Investigational New Drug (Ind)
Permit
Clinical Trials
Phase I
What are the side effects?
Is it safe enough to test?
Phase II
Does it work at all?
What is the dosage range?
Phase III
Is it better than placebo?
Is it better than other treatments?
What are the side-effects
Conflicts in Clinical Trials
Life Saving Drugs
Patients want a cure
Drugs probably do not work
What if the drug is available outside the trial?
Do you quit a drug that works to get on the trial?
What if the patient Lies?
Non-Life Saving Drugs
Pay the subjects?
Docs get paid by the patient
Companies want positive results
Submit for FDA Approval
Clinical Trials Can Take Years
Very Expensive >>$100,000,000
Most Drugs are Not Approved
Labeling is Key to Approval
Narrow Use allows More Dangerous
Drugs
Broader Use Means More Money
Modern Labeling
Labeled for the Physician
Physician Chooses the Drug
Physician Is Assumed to Know
Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Must Provide All Information About
Side-effects and Contraindications
Huge Issue When States Allow Non-
physicians to Prescribe Drugs
Labeling and Promotion
Label Limited to Proven Efficacy
Until Recently, Promotions Limited to
Proven Efficacy
What Is the PDR?
Private Listing of Drug Info and
Promotions
Info Provided in the PDR in a Label
Must Be the Same As the Package Insert
OTC Drugs
Labeling Is the Key
Directions for Safe Use
Recognize Complications Recognize Contraindications
X-OTC Switch
Why?
When?
Controlled Substances
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
What Are the 5 Schedules?
I High Potential for Abuse and No Currently Accepted Medical Use (in the Us) - Heroin
II High Potential for Abuse but a Medical Use
III Moderate Potential for Abuse
IV Low Potential for Abuse
V Lowest Potential for Abuse
Constitutional Right to Do Dope?
Post-Market Surveillance
Clinical Trials Are Limited in Time and Scope
Many Serious Side-effects Cannot be Detected in Trials
Dangerous to Include Pregnant Women, so no tetragons are detected
Docs are Supposed to Report Side-effects
Not always very effective
Large Scale Trials Should Continue
Who will fund them?
Drug Companies do not want to undermine their products