What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference...

8
What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007

Transcript of What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference...

Page 1: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups

Grassroots GrantmakersTopical Conference CallJuly 24, 2007

Page 2: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

A Working Definition of Grassroots Groups

Grassroots Grantmakers is especially interested in grassroots groups that share the following common characteristics:

•They arise from people’s shared experience of and interest in a place

•They are quintessentially and specifically local

•They are directly and immediately responsive to the needs and wishes of those involved

•The major part of the work is done not only for the people involved but also by them, with little or no paid staff, often without much specialized expertise, and usually without big budgets or other large resource reservoirs

•They have members – either implicitly or explicitly defined

•They vary in structure and formality, from more formal (with elected officers/or a board of directors, written by-laws, and members who pay dues) to very informal (without any officers or formal memberships – perhaps even without a name)

•They work with a clear sense of who “belongs” and with the understanding that the group is a vehicle for the collective action of the members.

•They range in size from 2 members to hundreds of members

•They can be temporary, transient or on-going

•They can be focused on a single issue or task or can work on multiple issues or tasks

Page 3: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

More about grassroots groups

The common denominator among grassroots groups – what distinguishes them from the non-profit organizations that are the most common recipients of foundation grants – is a structure that allows people who are bound together by their common experience of and interest in “place” to move their shared agenda forward in a way that depends on their collective commitment, energy, passion, and skills.

For grassroots groups, both the process and the product of their work contributes to a community’s strength and resiliency – with the process (being part of the group, sharing interests, hopes and frustrations, deciding to act, planning the activity, finding more people to help, doing the activity, celebrating success) as a critical vehicle for connecting people and strengthening the web of relationships in a community - and the product (a playground, a parade, newsletter, a clean-up, neighborhood watch, etc) as a tangible investment in the community’s livability.

Nonprofit agencies, with their orientation toward service and operational efficiency, are less about “who” and “how” and more about “what” – particularly in this time of fascination with outcomes. Grassroots groups are as much – maybe even more – about “who” and “how” than “what”. The assumption that we make is that this investment in “who” and “how” is an essential investment in the “what” of stronger communities.

Page 4: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

Classic first three phases for nonprofits – based on default to hierarchy

 PHASE 1

CREATIVITY

CRISIS IN LEADERSHIP

PHASE 2 DIRECTION

CRISIS IN AUTONOMY

PHASE 3 DELEGATION

CRISIS IN CONTROL

MANAGEMENT FOCUS Cause

Efficiency of operations

Building equilibrium through expansion of component pieces

DECISION MAKING Informal – ad-hoc

Codified, formal, centralized. Divisions are based on function

Decentralized – ideas are often generated at program level

TOP MANAGEMENT

Individualistic – small group or  personality driven

Top down and directive. One or a very few decision makers

Delegation to program units and functional departments

CONTROL SYSTEM

Results – impact and reports and reactions  from constituency are central

Reporting to performance standards and procedures

Held mostly at unit level - sometimes tracked through accreditations

REWARD Mission / Meaning SalaryTitles, promotions, political autonomy

Page 5: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

Top-Down Hierarchical Permeable / Participatory

Industrial Era Information Era

Page 6: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

1st Stage

Second StageSupporting

Centralization

Second StageSupportingSkilled Inclusion

Page 7: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

Market Feedback Models

FOR-PROFIT MARKET

Business Customerbuyer & user

feedback with financial consequences

NONPROFIT MARKET

Nonprofit Organization

Customer(buyer)

Customer(user)

feedback with financial consequences

Page 8: What Follows Emerging? Lifecycles of Grassroots Groups Grassroots Grantmakers Topical Conference Call July 24, 2007.

The opportunity for continued learning

Continued learning via a peer

learning circle

Discussion/sharing via on-line

forum

Share resources/articles

Request specific help

Document bank (members only)