WHAT DRIVES FINANCIAL SUCCESS ON A DAIRY? financial drivers...SCCs are highly correlated to all...
Transcript of WHAT DRIVES FINANCIAL SUCCESS ON A DAIRY? financial drivers...SCCs are highly correlated to all...
1 |
WHAT DRIVES FINANCIAL SUCCESSON A DAIRY?
2 |
MONEYBALL comes to the Dairy Industry
3 |
DAIRY AT A GLANCE
45,344Commercial Producers
(Dec 2014)
9.315 MM
Cows(Jan 2016)
207.7 BPounds of milk in 2015
worth $35.6 billion-$12 billion YOY
$17.15/cwt
2015 all-milk price-$7.00 YOY
2016
Prices Look Decidedly Lower,
But Feed Costs, Energy Also
Dramatically Lower
MarginsLooking Like
“Back to Reality”
Building World Stocks and Lower Demand Could Drag Prices
Down FurtherThrough 2016
US Dairy Prices Chasing
World PricesDown to Convergence
4 |
AGENDA
THE EVOLUTION OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY
WHAT WE DID
KEY TAKEAWAYS
1
2
3
5 |
SUMMARY
Herd demographics dominated by consolidation and expansion
Globalization of dairy markets dominates current and future growth opportunities
Recognition that domestic consumption needs protection:
Innovation required to meet needsof changing demographics andcompetition for position
Significant price volatility will remain; Focus on margin,not price
US DAIRY INDUSTRY HAS EVOLVED SIGNIFICANTLY OVER LAST DECADE
7 |
Source: USDA Census of Agriculture, 2012
HERD DEMOGRAPHICS: CONSOLIDATION AND EXPANSION
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1-29 30-49 50-99 100-199 200-499 500-999 1000-1999 2000+
Herds (*1K) % Cow Inventory % Milk
Herd Size Cohort
6.6%OF HERDS(N=~3400)
>50% SOLD IN TOP 2 COHORTS
IN 1999,
<2400 HERDS
PRODUCE
62.9%OF MILK
UP FROM
40%IN 2007
PRODUCED
24.4%OF MILK
9 |
AGENDA
THE EVOLUTION OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY
WHAT WE DID
KEY TAKEAWAYS
1
2
3
10 |
STUDY GOAL
TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC
DAIRY PRODUCTION MEASURESTHAT ARE CORRELATEDWITH THE
FINANCIAL HEALTHOF A DAIRY
11 |
DATA SOURCE AND PROCESS
SOURCE
Data was provided by AgStar, a major provider of agricultural lending and financial consulting services in the upper Midwest.
– The majority of the herds are based in MN, WI, SD, MI & OH
– Data collection began in 2006
PROCESS
Once the source was identified, we then performed a regression analysis to determine which metrics have the highest correlation to profitability.
12 |
WHAT IS A CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (R)?
A MEASURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TWO VARIABLES;CAN RANGE FROM -1 TO 1.
CORRELATION DOES NOT NECESSARILY EQUATE TO CAUSATION
Can be positive:NFI (Y) increases as milk yield increases (X)
Can be negative:NFI (Y) decreases as SCC increases (X)
Can be at or near zero:Little relationship between X and Y
13 |
THE DATA
367 clients from upper Midwest
90 total variables, 54 numeric
81 (not counting censored)
9 years
4.5 year-end records per farm (avg.)
1045 average lactating cows per farm (range from 95 to 4700 )
15 |
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Net Farm Income was the profitability measure investigated
Can also be expressed on a herd or cow basis
NFI is computed as:
Farm and year accounted for 75% of variation in profit
SOME GOOD, SOME BAD YEARS; 2014 WAS OUTSTANDING!
-0.3
2.58
1.31
-1.4
1.31
3.54
1.68
1.25
3.66
NFI, $/cwt ECM(BY ACCOUNTING YEAR)
’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14
AVG: $1.80; RANGE: ($5.07) - $12.29
$ RECEIPTS - (EXPENSES + DEPRECIATION)
16 |
*Labor cost, $/cwt ECM (includes wages, benefits, SS, owner draw)
**Net herd replacement cost, $/cwt ECM (difference between replacement cow value and book value of dead + sold cull cows [for dairy or beef])
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NFI AND KEY MEASURES
VARIABLECORRELATION
w/NFI KEY LEARNINGS
Herd size, lactating -0.02 Herd size not related to profit
Number heifers 0.03Heifer inventory not related to profitability –supports culling strategy
Milk shipped, herd total, cwt 0.00 Profitability not related to total lb shipped
ECM shipped, lb/cow/day 0.17More milk per cow is profitable – effect of marginal milk
Death loss (%) -0.13 Death losses negatively impact profitability
Heifer survival rate, % 0.18 Keeping calves healthy is beneficial
Somatic cell count -0.16 Investing to produce high quality milk is profitable
21 day pregnancy risk 0.29 Increased days open is expensive (small sample)
Labor cost* -0.04 Labor cost is unrelated to profitability
Net herd replacement cost** -0.33Lowering replacement costs helps profitability, value of cull cows
18 |
* Small but growing sample size
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEENSCC AND OTHER MEASURES
VARIABLE CORRELATION w/SCC
Profitability (NFI, $/cwt ECM/day) -0.16
ECM/cow/day, lb/day -0.41
Death loss, % 0.44
21-day pregnancy risk* -0.20
Days open* 0.35
DIFFERENCE IN PROFIT BETWEENHIGHEST 1/3 AND LOWEST 1/3(BASED ON SCC, $/cwt ECM)
$1.14/cwt(~$115 K/year*)
* Top third produced 355,587 cwt/year (91#/c/d); bottom third 254,333 cwt/year (72#/c/d)
** Small but growing sample size
19 |
TEASER: ARE SCCs MORE COSTLY NOW?
20 |
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEENECM AND OTHER MEASURES
VARIABLE CORRELATION w/ECM
Profitability (NFI, $/cwt ECM/day) 0.18
SCC x 1000 -0.41
Death loss, % -0.37
Breeding costs, $/cow 0.37
Feed cost, $/cwt ECM -0.30
21-day pregnancy rate, % 0.13
Days open -0.29
DIFFERENCE IN PROFIT BETWEENHIGHEST 1/3 AND LOWEST 1/3(BASED ON ECM, $/cwt ECM)
$1.44/cwt(~$86 K/year*)
* Top third produced 316,418 cwt/year; bottom third produced 256,843 cwt/year
21 |
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN21d PR* AND OTHER MEASURES
VARIABLE CORRELATION w/21-d PR
Profitability (NFI, $/cwt ECM/day) 0.29
SCC x 1000 -0.20
ECM, lb/cow/day 0.13
Days open -0.21
DIFFERENCE IN PROFIT BETWEENHIGHEST 1/3 AND LOWEST 1/3(BASED ON 21-d PR, $/cwt ECM)
$0.78/cwt(~$50 K/year**)
* Very small data set at this point
** Top third produced 388,246 cwt/year; bottom third produced 323,629 cwt/year
22 |
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEENDEATH RATES AND OTHER MEASURES
VARIABLE CORRELATION w/Death Rate
Profitability (NFI, $/cwt ECM/day) -0.13
ECM/cow/day, lb/day -0.37
SCC x 1000 0.44
Cost of production, $/cwt ECM 0.13
Net herd replacement cost, $ 0.29
Days open 0.19
DIFFERENCE IN PROFIT BETWEENHIGHEST 1/3 AND LOWEST 1/3(BASED ON DEATH RATE, $/cwt ECM)
$0.86/cwt(~$70 K/year*)
* Top third produced 388,246 cwt/year; bottom third produced 323,629 cwt/year
23 |
* Small but growing sample size
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NET HERD REPLACMENT COSTS AND OTHER MEASURES
VARIABLE CORRELATION w/ NHRC
Profitability (NFI, $/cwt ECM/day) -0.33
ECM/cow/day, lb/day -0.45
Cull + death rate, % 0.42
SCC x 1000 0.35
DIFFERENCE IN PROFIT BETWEENHIGHEST 1/3 AND LOWEST 1/3(BASED ON NHRC, $/cwt ECM)
$2.04/cwt(~$61 K/year*)
* Top third produced 315,189 cwt/year; bottom third produced 285,098 cwt/year
24 |
THE FOUR QUADRANTS OF HERD HEALTH
TENDENCIES BETWEEN NFI & HEALTHCARE EXPENSES
High Expenses & High NFI
STRATEGIC PREVENTION
High Expenses & Low NFI
FIRE ENGINE HEALTH CARE
Low Expenses & High NFI
GOOD FACILITIES, WELL-TRAINED
PEOPLE
Low Expenses & Low NFI
YOU GET OUT WHAT YOU PUT IN
25 |
AGENDA
THE EVOLUTION OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY
WHAT WE DID
KEY TAKEAWAYS
1
2
3
26 |
MAJOR MESSAGES
Milk production per cow is the single most important variable in determining farm profitability
SCCs are highly correlated to all major profit drivers
Reproductive efficiency measured as 21-d pregnancy rates is highly correlated to farm profitability
Replacement costs have a significant correlation with farm profitability.
Heifer management and survival impacts profitability from many angles and successful heifer management substantially supports successful ongoing operations
Excellent animal husbandry skills, as assessed by herd health parameters and death rates, have tremendous impact on herd profitability: (a) animal replacement costs, (b) Mastitis
27 |
QUESTIONS MOVING FORWARD…
Better characterization of reproductive performance, particularly around 21-day pregnancy rates and age at first calving (Data on 21 day pregnancy rates was limited; There was very limited variation in age at first calving among these herds)
Better characterization of the use of veterinarians and other external farm professionals
Improved understanding of labor metrics and their association with profitability. Labor is often the #2 or #3 expense on dairies behind feed (#1) and often replacements
Enhance understanding of technology application and its relation to profitability (monitoring devices, robotics, data management systems, genomics, other)
28 |
Photo courtesy of Dairy Management, Inc
GOT QUESTIONS?