What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

16
WORKING FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE . Edinburgh . UK www.iom- world.org What did we learn from the influenza pandemic of 2009/10? John Cherrie

description

A lecture given at the BOHS Conference in Harrogate in 2010.

Transcript of What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Page 1: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

WORKING FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE

INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE . Edinburgh . UK www.iom-world.org

What did we learn from the influenza pandemic of 2009/10?

John Cherrie

Page 2: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Summary…

• Pandemic, what pandemic!• Exposure routes and models• Respiratory protection and other

risk management measures• What did we learn?

Page 3: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?
Page 4: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

The pandemic…

http://www.who.int/

Page 5: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Fatalities in the EU…

Total 2876

UK 457

http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/Pages/Pandemic_Influenza.aspx

Page 6: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?
Page 7: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

With interventions

Aims of community intervention Delay and flatten epidemic peak.

Reduce peak burden on healthcare system and threat.

Somewhat reduce total number of cases.

Buy a little time.

Dailycases

Days since first case

No intervention

Based on an original graph developed by the US CDC, Atlanta

Page 8: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Exposure routes…

• Inhalation of airborne droplets• Respirable or Inhalable size

• Hand-to-mouth or object to mouth transmission• Mostly from inhalable or non-inhalable droplets

• Direct spray from a cough or sneeze• Non-inhalable droplets

Page 9: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Exposure models…

Nicas and Jones. Relative contributions of four exposure pathways to influenza infection risk. Risk Analysis (2009) vol. 29 (9) pp. 1292-1303

Nicas and Jones. Relative contributions of four exposure pathways to influenza infection risk. Risk Analysis (2009) vol. 29 (9) pp. 1292-1303

Page 10: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Relative contribution of different pathways

Nicas and Jones. Relative contributions of four exposure pathways to influenza infection risk. Risk Analysis (2009) vol. 29 (9) pp. 1292-1303

Page 11: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Official guidance…

• Standard infection control precautions and droplet precautions must be used for patients with suspected or confirmed pandemic influenza.

• Good hand hygiene among staff and patients is an important control measure.

• Good respiratory hygiene is essential: ‘Catch it, bin it, kill it’• The use of PPE should be proportionate to the risk of

contact with respiratory secretions and other body fluids, and should depend on the type of work or procedure.

• FFP3 respirators should be used during potentially infectious aerosol generating procedures.

http://www.hpa.org.uk/

Page 12: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

1918

Page 13: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Effectiveness of masks in lab tests…

Study Design Conclusions

Gawn et al Challenge test on test subject - Spray aerosol (<1μm to >200μm with approximately 50% of the particle number distribution <20μm)

Surgical masks provide around a 6-fold reduction in exposure.

Properly fitted respirators could provide at least a 100-fold reduction.

Eninger et al Challenge test on dummy head - Aerosol only

Penetration of aerosol about 3.5% (PF=30)

Page 14: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Respiratory protection…

Study Design ConclusionsAiello et al 1437 young adults living in university residence halls during the

2006–2007 influenza season was designed. Residence halls were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups— face mask use, face masks with hand hygiene, or control— for 6 weeks.

Neither face mask use and hand hygiene nor face mask use alone was associated with a significant reduction in the rate

Cowling et al Systematic review There is some evidence to support the wearing of masks or respirators during illness to protect others, and public health emphasis on mask wearing during illness may help to reduce influenza virus transmission. There are fewer data to support the use of masks or respirators to prevent becoming infected.

Loeb et al A randomized control trial to compare the surgical mask with the N95 respirator in protecting health care workers against influenza.

Among nurses in Ontario tertiary care hospitals, use of a surgical mask compared with an N95 respirator resulted in non inferior rates of laboratory- confirmed influenza.

Maclntyre et al Prospective cluster-randomized trial comparing surgical masks, non–fit- tested P2 masks, and no masks in prevention of influenza- like illness (ILI) in households.

Concluded that household use of face masks is associated with low adherence and is ineffective for controlling seasonal respiratory disease. However, during a severe pandemic when use of face masks might be greater, pandemic transmission in households could be reduced.

Jacobs et al Health care workers in a tertiary care hospital in Japan were randomized into 2 groups: 1 that wore face masks and 1 that did not.

No difference in flu symptoms but statistically significant increase in “feeling bad” and headaches amongst those wearing masks.

Jefferson et al Review systematically the evidence of effectiveness of physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

Hand washing more than 10 times daily (odds ratio 0.45)Wearing masks (0.32), Wearing N95 masks (0.09), Wearing gloves (0.43), Wearing gowns (0.23), and Hand washing, masks, gloves, and gowns combined (0.09).

Cowling et al Cluster randomized, controlled trial. 07 people presenting to outpatient clinics with influenza- like illness who were positive for influenza A or B virus by rapid testing (index patients) and 794 household members (contacts) in 259 households.

Interventions implemented within 36 hours of symptom onset in the index patient, transmission of RT-PCR–confirmed infection seemed reduced, an effect attributable to fewer infections among participants using facemasks plus hand hygiene (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.87])

Study Design Conclusions

Aiello et al 1437 young adults living in university residence halls during the 2006–2007 influenza season was designed. Residence halls were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups— face mask use, face masks with hand hygiene, or control— for 6 weeks.

Neither face mask use and hand hygiene nor face mask use alone was associated with a significant reduction in the rate

Cowling et al Systematic review There is some evidence to support the wearing of masks or respirators during illness to protect others, and public health emphasis on mask wearing during illness may help to reduce influenza virus transmission. There are fewer data to support the use of masks or respirators to prevent becoming infected.

Loeb et al A randomized control trial to compare the surgical mask with the N95 respirator in protecting health care workers.

Use of a surgical mask compared with an N95 respirator resulted in non inferior rates of laboratory- confirmed influenza.

Maclntyre et al Prospective cluster-randomized trial comparing surgical masks, non–fit- tested P2 masks, and no masks in prevention of influenza- like illness (ILI) in households.

Concluded that household use of face masks is associated with low adherence and is ineffective for controlling seasonal respiratory disease. However, during a severe pandemic when use of face masks might be greater, pandemic transmission in households could be reduced.

Jacobs et al Health care workers in a tertiary care hospital in Japan were randomized into 2 groups: 1 that wore face masks and 1 that did not.

No difference in flu symptoms but statistically significant increase in “feeling bad” and headaches amongst those wearing masks.

Jefferson et al Review systematically the evidence of effectiveness of physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

Hand washing more than 10 times daily (odds ratio 0.45)Wearing masks (0.32), Wearing N95 masks (0.09), Wearing gloves (0.43), Wearing gowns (0.23), and Hand washing, masks, gloves, and gowns combined (0.09).

Cowling et al Cluster randomized, controlled trial. 07 people presenting to outpatient clinics with influenza- like illness who were positive for influenza A or B virus by rapid testing (index patients) and 794 household members (contacts) in 259 households.

Interventions implemented within 36 hours of symptom onset in the index patient, transmission of RT-PCR–confirmed infection seemed reduced, an effect attributable to fewer infections among participants using facemasks plus hand hygiene (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.87])

Page 15: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

So what did we learn?

• The importance of the respiratory pathway may have been underestimated

• The effectiveness of interventions depends on prompt and consistent implementation

• Surgical masks offer some protection, but you probably need a respirator to protect against aerosols

• Occupational hygiene has a lot to contribute to understanding how best to manage infectious diseases

Page 16: What did we learn from the Influenza pandemic?

Slide presentation on OH-world.org

You can download this and other presentations from OH-world.org

Follow my blog on Twitter.com/JohnCherrie