WHAT ARE MICROAGGRESSIONS AND HOW DO THEY IMPACT …

22
WHAT ARE MICROAGGRESSIONS AND HOW DO THEY IMPACT LEARNING? March 25, 2015 Cheryl R. Richardson CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

Transcript of WHAT ARE MICROAGGRESSIONS AND HOW DO THEY IMPACT …

WHAT ARE MICROAGGRESSIONS AND HOW DO THEY IMPACT LEARNING?

March 25, 2015Cheryl R. Richardson

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

OUTLINE

• What are microaggressions?

• How do they appear in classrooms and what are their impacts?

• What can we do about them?

• Announcements

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

SOME ASSUMPTIONS

Our society is one in which there exists individual, institutional and societal biases.

We have inherited the biases of our ancestors, institutions and society.

Biases can be expressed in invisible, unintentional, and subtle ways and yet remain consequential.

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

TODAY’S CONVERSATION

• Open

• Generous

We can never judge the lives of others, because each person knows only

their own pain and renunciation. It’s one

thing to feel that you are on the right path, but it’s

another to think that yours is the only path.”

~Paulo Coehlo

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

WHAT IS MICROAGGRESSION?

The everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs or insults (whether intentional or unintentional) that communicate hostile, derogatory or negative messages to target persons based upon their marginalized group membership.

The cumulative effect has a larger impact.

Sue, 2010

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

MICROINEQUITIES

The ways in which individuals are "either singled out, or overlooked, ignored, or otherwise discounted" based on an unchangeable characteristic such as race or gender.

A microinequity generally takes the form of a gesture, different kind of language, treatment, bias or even tone of voice.

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

TYPES OF MICROAGGRESSIONS

• Micro-assaults – conscious and intentional actions or slurs

• Micro-insults – (often unconscious) verbal and nonverbal communication that subtly convey rudeness and insensitivity and demean a person’s identity

• Micro-invalidations – (often unconscious) communication that subtly excludes, negates or nullifies the thoughts, feelings or reality of a marginalized

Sue (2010)

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

microaggressions

microinvalidationmicroassaultmicroinsult

• Ascription of intelligence based on race

• Pathologizing cultural values & communication styles

• Assumption of criminal or other status

• eg. Rolling eyes when someone speaks of their culture

• Alien in own land• Color Blindness• Interrupting a woman

while speaking• Denial of racism • Valuing the contribution of

a dominant student over a marginalized

• Purposeful hurtful, discriminatory actions. Direct, publicly expressed bias

• eg. Fraternity video• eg. Avoiding working with

others in groups

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

COMPLICATIONS

• individualized bias

• promotes hierarchy of oppression/victimization

• confusion with all environmental indignities

• intent

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

EXAMPLES OF MICROAGGRESSIONS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScOA-_tsi-Y

Please do the worksheet“Death by a thousand nicks…”

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

Messages of marginalization

Race: Non-white You & your people are criminals; your achievements are because of affirmative action; you’re ugly

Ethnicity: Not European-American You’re not a true American; your food is weird; your name is abnormal

Gender/Sex: Female You’re a sex object; you’re weak

Sexual orientation: LGBT* Your displays of affection are offensive

Religion: Not Christian Your religion is immoral or violent

Disability: Not Abled You are deficient

Veteran status: Not Civilian You are right-wing and violent

Class/SES: Not Upper Class You are tasteless and have no manners

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

MICRO AGGRESSIONS IN THE CLASSROOM

• inappropriate jokes

• singling out students/increased scrutiny

• project due dates on religious holidays

• stereotyping

• invalidation and distortion in curricular choices

• exclusion from groups

• responding more readily to inquiries from male students with European names

• consistently mispronouncing names

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

WORKING THROUGH SOME SCENARIOS

• What is the societal/hidden message that makes the question or statement a microaggression?

• How might this microaggression impact learning in this classroom?

• What are emotional, social, and physical costs of this microaggression?

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

IMPACT OF MICRO AGGRESSIONS• invalidation of group identity or experiential reality

• devaluation of individual people and groups

• communication of being a lesser human being

• intimidation

• regulation to inferior status and treatment

• psychological and physical problems

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

MICROAGGRESSIONS AND LEARNING• perception of negative or hostile campus climate

• decreased cognitive functioning

Salvatore & Shelton, 2007

• students who witness bias display negative behaviors and/or devalue marginalized people’s activities and work

Goodman, et. al. , 2008

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

SCENARIOS

• What are potential responses from the instructor?

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT?• attempt to understand one’s own biases

• learn about others’ cultures, histories, experiences. listen

• confront biased students

• present evidence that counteracts bias and stereotypes

• do not allow pejorative terms in class

• allow vernacular comfortable to the speaker

• humor

• questioning

• surprise

• ignore it

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

Direct confrontation

IgnoreDiscussion Private confrontation

Providecounter examples

Range of intensity of responses

decide based on goals: • reduce bias choose high intensity or moderate intensity• maintain comfort for target of bias choose moderate intensity• maintain comfort for all students choose moderate intensity• model unbiased behavior choose moderate intensity

Highest levels of learning occur with moderate arousal

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

REFERENCES• Boysen, G.A. (2012). Teacher and Student Perceptions of Microaggressions in College Classrooms. College Teaching,

60:3, 122-129.

• Boysen, G. A., & Vogel, D. L. (2009). Bias in the classroom: Types, frequencies, and responses. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 12–17.

• Czopp, A. M., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 532–544.

• Goodman, J. A., Schell, J., Alexander, M. G., & Eidelman, S. (2008). The impact of a derogatory remark on prejudice toward a gay male leader. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 542–555.

• Salvatore, J., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Cognitive costs of exposure to racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 18, 810–815.

• Sue, D. W., Lin, A. I., Torino, G. C., Capodilupo, C. M., & Rivera, D. P. (2009). Racial microaggressions and difficult dialogs on race in the classroom. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15, 183–190.

• Zesiger, H. (2013). Racial Microaggressions and College Student Wellbeing: An annotated bibliography for student affairs and health promotion professionals in higher education.

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

ANNOUNCEMENTS• April 10 - First Friday Roundtable

• April 22 - TLC: Stereotype threat and impostor syndrome

• June 1-4 Summer Faculty Institute

• Diversity Track - Submit interest by April 30

ctal.udel.edu

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING

IMPACT• psychological - anxiety

• physical - stress

• inequitable treatment (healthcare, education, employment, discipline)

• Such messages mark who belongs and who doesn’t, who is worthy of America’s promise and who is not, who is worthy of our national empathy, care, and resources and who isn’t.