Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

12
1 What Goes up Must Come Down: the Challenges of Getting Evidence Back to the Ground Rigmor Argren March 2013 Photo Credit: Jonathan Hyams/ Save the Children UK

Transcript of Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

Page 1: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

1

What Goes up Must Come Down: the Challenges of Getting Evidence

Back to the Ground

Rigmor ArgrenMarch 2013

Photo Credit: Jonathan Hyams/ Save the Children UK

Page 2: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

2

Save the Children International

Photo Credit: Rigmor Argren/ Save the Children, Bonga, Ethiopia 2006

29 Save the Children Members

SCI in 47 Countries(6 remaining)Development andHumanitarian

Programmes

Page 3: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

3

Save the Children’s Humanitarian Responses

26 responses in 30 countries. (Feb 2013)

• Education in Emergencies • Health and

Nutrition • WASH• Food Security and

Livelihoods• Shelter• Child Protection in

Emergencies

Page 4: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

4

”Evidence”: 1. Monitoring2. Real Time Reviews3. Evaluation of Humanitarian

Action”Back to the Ground”: Actions to Improve

Humanitarian Response

Photo credit: Save the Children

“Getting Evidence Back to the Ground”

Page 5: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

5

Real Time Reviews

Real Time Reveiws:• In Real Time (8-10 weeks)•Mandatory for large scale responses• Internal• facilitatory approach

Page 6: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

6

ALNAP Evaluation Frame Applied

Photo Credit: Nyani Quarmyne/ Save the Children

Capacity Area 1:

Increased demand for evaluation information

Capacity Area 2:

Purpose and Strategic timing

Capacity Area 3: Focus on what to evaluate

Capacity Area 4: Adequate resourcing

Page 7: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

7

Evidence for Learnings

Why We Do What We Do

What We Get

What We Do

What We Do

Resistance

Argyris & Schön (1978)

Page 8: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

8

Evidence for Single Loop Learning

Photo Credit: Save the Children

”Evidence”: 1. Monitoring2. Real Time Reviews3. Evaluation of

Humanitarian Action

Page 9: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

9

RTR Evidence for Single Loop Learning

Photo Credit: Colin Crowley/Save the Children

• Strengthen sector integration

• Improved interaction with local communities

• Re-enforcing security protocols

• Increased visibility

Page 10: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

10

Photo Credit: Helene Caux/ UNHCR, 2004

RTR Evidence for Double Loop

•Changed approach to implementation•Re-inforced

leadership•Creating the

Strategic Momentum

Page 11: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

11

Challenges with RTR Evidence

Photo Credit: Save the Children

• Short Lived Data•Destill Generic and

Transferable Learnings•Evidence from

External Sources•Decision Making•Needs follow-up

Page 12: Whast goes up must come down: challenges of getting evidence back to the ground

12

Photo credit: Rigmor Argren/ Save the Children

Opportunities

•Connect available Evidence• Seek Trends,

through Longitudinal Observations•Leverage the Dual

Mandate•RTRs can be

prepared/planned•RTRs can relate to

assessments