Westside Purple Line Extension Final Supplemental ... · On the positive side, the 25 mph Curve...
Transcript of Westside Purple Line Extension Final Supplemental ... · On the positive side, the 25 mph Curve...
November 2017
Westside Purple Line Extension
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement andSection 4(f) EvaluationAppendix L: Section 4(f) Supporting Documentation
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
WESTSIDE PURPLE LINE EXTENSION PROJECT, SECTION 2 ADVANCED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Contract No. PS-4350-2000
Standard Cost Category Estimate Methodology Prepared for:
Prepared by:
777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 November 13, 2017
Standard Cost Category Estimate Methodology
Table of Contents
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T Page i November 13, 2017
Table of Contents
1.0 SCC METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 1
Standard Cost Category Estimate Methodology
1.0 - SCC Methodology
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T Page 1 November 13, 2017
1.0 SCC METHODOLOGY
Capital cost estimates for each alternative were produced in FTA’s Standard Cost Categories (SCC) format utilizing the most current Capital Cost Estimate for Section 2 of the Project, dated August 2015. Parametric unit costs were derived from this estimate and applied to the various alternatives based on their specific quantities where it was feasible to do so. The specific quantities for each alternative were based on each alternatives alignment. The tunnel length for each alignment impacts not only the cost of the tunnel but also proportionally impacts the cost of trackwork, hazardous materials mitigation, train control, and other elements. Costs appearing for SCC Section 60 ROW, Land and Existing Improvements were produced for each alternative using the parcel clip methodology by extending a line 35 feet from the centerline of both tunnels in each direction to either capture in total or in part parcels from which a sub-surface easement would be required and a cost calculated for those easements. Costs appearing for SCC Section 80 Professional Services use the various percentages for the sub-elements making up this section of the Project and then applying those same percentages to each alternative’s total cost of construction (SCC Sections 10 through 50). Allocated and unallocated contingencies were calculated using the same percentage as in the Project estimate.
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,323 11,546 355,56710.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424 - 0
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,006 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,927 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 0 (793) -16,77010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 0 84 2,52010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810 12,734 27,593
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 0 (793) -1,71810.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,046 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110 12,734 2,094
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$ (793) -130
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,378 2 516,03020.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361 2,214 517,012
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0 -20 -24,000
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 0 0 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018 2 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,955 11545.76 403,44240.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055 2,214 12,607
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,258 2,214 86,02840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,939 12,761 20,65540.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,041 12,761 1,92240.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 0 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,916 2,214 2,00440.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,763 2,214 11,25640.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982 1 268,970
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,734 11545.76 95,61950.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,133 12,761 2,00850.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,485 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,177 12,761 14,28950.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,749 12,761 1,64750.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,516 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,389 11545.76 1,370,65860 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422 11545.76 338,953
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,471 311,53160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,826 16,95160.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125 10,472
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,351 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,592 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,941 27% 374,18780.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,543 1.7% 22,94580.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002 10.0% 137,419
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,460 8.2% 112,52780.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,708 3.5% 48,44580.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,027 0.9% 11,72180.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,708 0.5% 6,53780.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494 2.5% 34,592
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,104 11545.76 2,169,14990 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441 10.2% 220,514Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545 11545.76 2,389,664100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545 11545.76 2,389,664
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT) -20,881
LPA = 0.00
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
Santa Monica Blvd= 0.01b
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
LPA = 0.00
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
13,133 403,966
100.00 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
794 16,792
- 0
12,834 27,810
794 1,721
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
794 131
2 605,0102,214 517,012
0 0
36.1 64,980
2 23,018
13132.84 441,0212,214 12,607
2,214 86,02814,348 23,22414,348 2,161
02,214 2,0042,214 11,256
1 303,741
13132.84 97,8502 19,194
14,348 2,258
2 13,485
14,348 16,066
2 33,236
14,348 1,852
2 10,516
1 1,244
13132.84 1,547,84713132.84 349,464
311,53116,95120,982
20 85,35120 77,592
10% 7,759
27% 422,5591.7% 25,911
10.0% 155,184
8.2% 127,073
3.5% 54,708
0.9% 13,237
0.5% 7,382
2.5% 39,064
13132.84 2,405,22110.2% 244,513
13132.84 2,649,735
13132.84 2,649,735
239,190
Century Park A= 0.02
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
LPA = 0.00
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
13,290 407,663
100.00 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
952 20,122
- 0
12,834 27,810
952 2,062
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
952 156
2 537,7902,117 494,361
0 0
11.3 20,412
2 23,018
13290.28 419,8132,117 12,055
2,117 82,25814,505 23,47914,505 2,185
02,117 1,9162,117 10,763
1 287,157
13290.28 98,0722 19,194
14,505 2,282
2 13,485
14,505 16,242
2 33,236
14,505 1,872
2 10,516
1 1,244
13290.28 1,463,33813290.28 347,970
311,53116,95119,488
20 85,35120 77,592
10% 7,759
27% 399,4881.7% 24,497
10.0% 146,711
8.2% 120,135
3.5% 51,721
0.9% 12,514
0.5% 6,979
2.5% 36,931
13290.28 2,296,14710.2% 233,425
13290.28 2,529,572
13290.28 2,529,572
119,027
Century Park B= 0.03
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
LPA = 0.00
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
13,079 402,696
100.00 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
740 15,649
- 0
12,834 27,810
740 1,604
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
740 122
2 532,6062,117 494,361
0 0
8.5 15,228
2 23,018
13078.75 416,7972,117 12,055
2,117 82,25814,294 23,13614,294 2,153
02,117 1,9162,117 10,763
1 284,515
13078.75 97,7742 19,194
14,294 2,249
2 13,485
14,294 16,005
2 33,236
14,294 1,845
2 10,516
1 1,244
13078.75 1,449,87413078.75 352,437
311,53116,95123,955
20 85,35120 77,592
10% 7,759
27% 395,8131.7% 24,271
10.0% 145,361
8.2% 119,030
3.5% 51,245
0.9% 12,399
0.5% 6,915
2.5% 36,591
13078.75 2,283,47510.2% 232,137
13078.75 2,515,612
13078.75 2,515,612
105,067
Century Park C= 0.04
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
LPA = 0.00
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10,599 354,713175.00 23,492
1 78,00612,339 260,927(1,740) -36,796
- 012,909 27,973(1,740) -3,771
1 3,04612,909 2,123(1,740) -286
2 233,652902 210,635
0 00 02 23,018
10598.74 249,820902 5,136
1,077 41,84811,814 19,12211,814 1,779
01,077 9751,077 5,475
1 175,484
10598.74 56,0711 9,59711,814 1,8591 6,74211,814 13,2281 16,61811,814 1,5251 5,2581 1,244
10598.74 894,25610598.74 293,258
254,25714,82624,175
20 85,35120 77,592
10% 7,759
27% 244,1301.7% 14,97010.0% 89,656
8.2% 73,4163.5% 31,6070.9% 7,6470.5% 4,2652.5% 22,569
10598.74 1,516,99610.2% 154,217
10598.74 1,671,212
10598.74 1,671,212
-739,332
Without Constellation Station
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,672 393,151
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
333 7,051
- 0
12,834 27,810
333 723
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
333 55
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
12,672 409,7142,117 12,055
- 0
2,117 82,25813,887 22,47813,887 2,092
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 278,152
12,672 97,2032 19,194
13887.21 2,185
2 13,485
13887.21 15,550
2 33,236
13887.21 1,792
2 10,516
1 1,244
12672.21 1,417,44712672.21 354,448
311,53116,95125,967
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 391,3631.7% 23,728
10.0% 142,110
4,402
8.2% 116,368
3.5% 50,099
0.9% 12,122
0.5% 6,760
2.5% 35,773
12,672 2,248,6090.10 228,592
1267221% 2,477,201
12672.21 2,477,201
66,656
Century Park D= 0.05
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,561 390,533
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
222 4,693
- 0
12,834 27,810
222 481
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
222 36
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2 23,018
12560.70 408,7922,117 12,055
2,117 82,25813,776 22,29813,776 2,075
02,117 1,9162,117 10,763
1 277,426
12560.70 97,0462 19,194
13,776 2,168
2 13,485
13,776 15,425
2 33,236
13,776 1,778
2 10,516
1 1,244
12560.70 1,413,74912560.70 314,591
272,47114,82627,295
20 85,35120 77,592
10% 7,759
27% 390,3531.7% 23,666
10.0% 141,740
4,402
8.2% 116,064
3.5% 49,968
0.9% 12,090
0.5% 6,743
2.5% 35,680
12,561 2,204,04510.2% 224,062
12560.70 2,428,107
12560.70 2,428,107
17,562
Constellation Direct= 0.06
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,508 389,307
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
170 3,589
- 0
12,834 27,810
170 368
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
170 28
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
12,508 408,3592,117 12,055
2,117 82,25813,723 22,21313,723 2,067
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 277,086
12,508 96,9722 19,194
13723.46 2,159
2 13,485
13723.46 15,367
2 33,236
13723.46 1,771
2 10,516
1 1,244
12508.46 1,412,01712508.46 311,419
272,47114,82624,123
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 389,8801.7% 23,637
10.0% 141,566
4,402
8.2% 115,922
3.5% 49,907
0.9% 12,075
0.5% 6,734
2.5% 35,636
12,508 2,198,6670.10 223,515
1250846% 2,422,183
12508.46 2,422,183
11,638
Lasky Drive A= 0.07
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,606 391,605
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
268 5,658
- 0
12,834 27,810
268 580
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
268 44
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
12,606 409,1692,117 12,055
2,117 82,25813,821 22,37213,821 2,082
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 277,723
12,606 97,1102 19,194
13821.33 2,175
2 13,485
13821.33 15,476
2 33,236
13821.33 1,784
2 10,516
1 1,244
12606.33 1,415,26212606.33 312,085
272,47114,82624,789
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 390,7661.7% 23,692
10.0% 141,891
4,402
8.2% 116,189
3.5% 50,022
0.9% 12,103
0.5% 6,750
2.5% 35,718
12,606 2,203,4650.10 224,003
1260633% 2,427,468
12606.33 2,427,468
16,923
Lasky Drive B= 0.08
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,491 388,897
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
152 3,220
- 0
12,834 27,810
152 330
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
152 25
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
12,491 408,5712,117 12,055
1 287
2,117 82,25813,706 22,18513,706 2,064
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 277,043
12,491 96,9482 19,194
13706.02 2,157
2 13,485
13706.02 15,347
2 33,236
13706.02 1,769
2 10,516
1 1,244
12491.02 1,411,79512491.02 307,581
272,47114,82620,285
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 389,8201.7% 23,634
10.0% 141,544
4,402
8.2% 115,904
3.5% 49,899
0.9% 12,073
0.5% 6,733
2.5% 35,630
12,491 2,194,5470.10 223,096
1249102% 2,417,643
12491.02 2,417,643
7,098
Spaulding (SEIS)
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,021 377,868
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
(318) -6,715
- 0
12,834 27,810
(318) -688
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
(318) -52
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
12,021 404,3272,117 12,055
2,117 82,25813,236 21,42513,236 1,994
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 273,916
12,021 96,2872 19,194
13236.24 2,083
2 13,485
13236.24 14,821
2 33,236
13236.24 1,708
2 10,516
1 1,244
12021.24 1,395,86012021.24 316,642
272,47114,82629,346
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 385,4691.7% 23,367
10.0% 139,946
4,402
8.2% 114,596
3.5% 49,336
0.9% 11,937
0.5% 6,657
2.5% 35,228
12,021 2,183,3230.10 221,955
1202124% 2,405,278
12021.24 2,405,278
-5,267
Constellation South= 0.13
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
14,002 410,713
- 0
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
1,663 35,170
- 0
12,734 27,593
1,663 3,604
1 3,046
12,734 2,094
1,663 273
2 493,3782117 494,361
-20 -24,000
0 0
2.00 23,018
14,002 411,5262,117 12,055
2,117 82,25815,217 24,63115,217 2,292
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 277,611
14,002 99,0722 19,194
15216.87 2,394
2 13,485
15216.87 17,039
2 33,236
15216.87 1,964
2 10,516
1.00 1,244
14001.87 1,414,68914001.87 309,509
272,47114,82622,213
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 390,6101.7% 23,682
10.0% 141,834
4,402
8.2% 116,141
3.5% 50,001
0.9% 12,098
0.5% 6,747
2.5% 35,703
14,002 2,200,1600.10 223,667
1400187% 2,423,826
14001.87 2,423,826
13,281
Avenue of the Stars= 0.14
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,412 387,036
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
73 1,544
- 0
12,834 27,810
73 158
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
73 12
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
12,412 408,2722,117 12,055
2 573
2,117 82,25813,627 22,05713,627 2,052
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 276,597
12,412 96,8362 19,194
13626.76 2,144
2 13,485
13626.76 15,258
2 33,236
13626.76 1,759
2 10,516
1 1,244
12411.76 1,409,52312411.76 313,368
272,47114,82626,072
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 389,1991.7% 23,596
10.0% 141,316
4,402
8.2% 115,717
3.5% 49,819
0.9% 12,054
0.5% 6,722
2.5% 35,573
12,412 2,197,4420.10 223,391
1241176% 2,420,832
12411.76 2,420,832
10,288
Linden*
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
12,387 386,450
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
48 1,015
- 0
12,834 27,810
48 104
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
48 8
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
12,387 408,0652,117 12,055
2 573
2,117 82,25813,602 22,01613,602 2,049
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 276,434
12,387 96,8012 19,194
13601.76 2,140
2 13,485
13601.76 15,230
2 33,236
13601.76 1,755
2 10,516
1 1,244
12386.76 1,408,69412386.76 311,097
272,47114,82623,801
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 388,9731.7% 23,582
10.0% 141,233
4,402
8.2% 115,649
3.5% 49,790
0.9% 12,047
0.5% 6,719
2.5% 35,552
12,387 2,194,1150.10 223,052
1238676% 2,417,168
12386.76 2,417,168
6,623
McCarty*
M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E (Rev.16, June, 2014)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 0/20/2017
Westside Purple Line Extension Project 2015
Section 2 - 4F Alternative Analysis 2026
Unit Cost ($)
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS 31,229$ 12,339 385,32310.06 Guideway: Underground cut & cover 134,238$ 100 13,424
10.07A Guideway Underground Tunnel: TBMs & Support Equipment's (Fix Costs) 78,005,754$ 1 78,00610.07B Guideway Underground Tunnel: Twin Tunnel /Precast Liner (Variable Costs) 21,147$ 12,339 260,92710.07C Guideway: Underground Tunnel (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 21,147$ 010.07D Guideway: Underground Tunnel SEM (Added Cost) 30,000$ 010.09 Track: Direct fixation 2,167$ 12,834 27,810
10.09A Track: Direct fixation (Delta from LPA) 2,167$ 010.12 Track: Special (switches, turnouts) 3,045,748$ 1 3,04610.13 Track: Vibration and noise dampening 164$ 12,834 2,110
10.13A Track: Vibration and noise dampening (Delta from LPA) 164$
20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 258,689,181$ 2 517,37820.03 Underground station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 233,519$ 2117 494,361
20.03A Underground station,Reduce Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,200,000$ 0
20.03B Underground station, Increase Station Depth (Delta from LPA) 1,800,000$ 020.07 Elevators, escalators 11,508,846$ 2.00 23,018
40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12,339 406,95540.01 Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork 5,694$ 2,117 12,055
40.01A Removal of Oil Wells 286,566$ - 040.02 Site Utilities, Utility Relocation 38,856$ 2,117 82,25840.03 Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,619$ 13,554 21,93940.04 Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 151$ 13,554 2,04140.05 Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 040.06 Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping 905$ 2,117 1,91640.07 Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 5,084$ 2117 10,76340.08 Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 24.4% 1.00 275,982
50 SYSTEMS 12,339 96,73450.01 Train control and signals 9,597,022$ 2 19,194
50.01A Train control and signals (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 157$ 13553.76 2,13350.03 Traction power supply: substations 6,742,262$ 2 13,48550.04 Traction power distribution: (Tunnel L Delta from LPA) 1,120$ 13553.76 15,17750.05 Communications 16,618,188$ 2 33,236
51.05A Communications 129$ 13553.76 1,74950.06 Fare collection system and equipment 5,258,110$ 2 10,51650.07 Central Control 1,243,759$ 1 1,244
12338.76 1,406,38960 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 12338.76 312,422
60.01 Purchase or lease of real estate 272,47160.02 Relocation of existing households and businesses 14,82660.03 Sub Surface Easements (SSE's) 25,125
70 VEHICLES (number) 4,246,337$ 20 85,35170.02 Heavy Rail 20 77,59270.07 Spare parts 10% 7,759
80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats. 10-50) 27% 383,94180.01 Project Development 1.7% 23,54380.02 Engineering 10.0% 141,002
80.02A Additional Geotech Investigations, SEIS, CEQA & Contract Docs 80.03 Project Management for Design and Construction 8.2% 115,46080.04 Construction Administration & Management 3.5% 49,70880.06 Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 0.9% 12,02780.07 Surveys, Testing, Investigation, Inspection 0.5% 6,70880.08 Start up 2.5% 35,494
Subtotal (10 - 80) 12,339 2,188,10490 UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY 10.2% 222,441Subtotal (10 - 90) 1233876% 2,410,545100 FINANCE CHARGES
Total Project Cost (10 - 100) 12338.76 2,410,545
Total Delta Cost (LPA-ALT)
Construction Subtotal (10 - 50)
LPA = 0.00
Quantity Total Cost ($1,000)
11,845 373,724
100 13,424
1 78,006
12,339 260,927
(494) -10,447
- 0
12,834 27,810
(494) -1,070
1 3,046
12,834 2,110
(494) -81
2 517,3782117 494,361
0 0
0 0
2.00 23,018
11,845 403,5792,117 12,055
2 573
2,117 82,25813,060 21,13913,060 1,967
02,117 1,916
2117 10,7631.00 272,907
11,845 96,0392 19,194
13059.76 2,055
2 13,485
13059.76 14,624
2 33,236
13059.76 1,686
2 10,516
1 1,244
11844.76 1,390,72111844.76 310,123
272,47114,82622,826
20 85,3512000% 77,592
10% 7,759
27.3% 384,0661.7% 23,281
10.0% 139,431
4,402
8.2% 114,174
3.5% 49,154
0.9% 11,893
0.5% 6,633
2.5% 35,098
11,845 2,170,2610.10 220,627
1184476% 2,390,888
11844.76 2,390,888
-19,657
Camden*
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
WESTSIDE PURPLE LINE EXTENSION PROJECT, SECTION 2 ADVANCED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Contract No. PS-4350-2000
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District Prepared for:
Prepared by:
777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Table of Contents
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 1 November 21, 2017
Table of Contents
REVIEW OF THE ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED BY THE BEVERLY HILLS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT .............1
OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................................1
EVALUATION MATRIX OF THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES ................................................2
REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED BY THE BEVERLY HILLS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA............................................................................................................5
1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................5
2.0 SPALDING DRIVE ALTERNATIVE ..............................................................................................6 2.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics ............................................................................ 6 2.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics .............................................................. 6
3.0 LINDEN DRIVE ALTERNATIVE ..................................................................................................7 3.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics ............................................................................ 7 3.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics .............................................................. 7
4.0 CAMDEN DRIVE ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................8 4.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics ............................................................................ 8 4.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics .............................................................. 8
5.0 MCCARTY DRIVE ALTERNATIVE...............................................................................................9 5.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics ............................................................................ 9 5.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristic................................................................ 9
6.0 ANALYSIS OF METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA ......................................................................... 10
REVIEW OF HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORDS FOR ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED BY THE BEVERLY HILLS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ................................................................................................... 13
1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 13
2.0 HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD ............................................................................................... 13
3.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 14
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 1 November 21, 2017
OVERVIEW
On behalf of the Beverly Hills Unified School District (BHUSD), Stone Consulting prepared four horizontal alignment alternatives for the Westside Purple Line Extension - Section 2 between Beverly Hills (Wilshire / Rodeo Station) and Century City (Constellation Station) (refer to Final SEIS Appendix H to letter from Beverly Hills Unified School District dated July 24, 2017), which are identified as:
S-1: Spalding Drive (this is a slightly different alignment from the Spaulding Drive Alternative evaluated in the Draft SEIS)
S-2: Linden Drive
S-3: Camden Drive
S-4: McCarty Drive
Figure 1. Alignments Proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
This technical memorandum contains the following:
Evaluation matrix of the BHUSD-proposed alignments
Review of the BHUSD-proposed alignments to Metro Design Criteria
Review of potential historic properties in the vicinity of the BHUSD-proposed alignments
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Page 2
EVALUATION MATRIX OF THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES
No Impact The Project (SEIS) Spalding (SEIS) Linden1 McCarty1 Camden1
1 Ability to Mitigate Adverse Impacts on Each Section 4(f) Property
Remaining Adverse Impacts to Section 4(f) Properties
Impacts avoided by tunneling under 4(f) properties
Impacts avoided by tunneling under 4(f) properties
Impacts avoided by tunneling under 4(f) properties
Impacts avoided by tunneling under 4(f) properties
Impacts avoided by tunneling under 4(f) properties
2 Relative Severity of Remaining Harm
Square feet of tunneling under historic property
56,292 69,737 72,885 74,908 71,819
Square feet of tunneling under Section 4(f) recreational property
36,930 44,410 51,834 54,016 50,038
Alignment under BHHS
Length (ft) 745 954 1,058 1,099 1,034
Area (sq ft) 50,240 67,160 71,560 73,570 70,490
Construction phase impacts to Section 4(f) Properties
Monitoring instruments at BHHS and construction staging at AAA Building
Monitoring instruments at BHHS and construction staging at AAA Building, Grouting from Surface and instrumentation above cross passage
Monitoring instruments at BHHS and construction staging at AAA Building, Grouting from Surface and instrumentation above cross passage
Monitoring instruments at BHHS and construction staging at AAA Building, Grouting from Surface and instrumentation above cross passage
Monitoring instruments at BHHS and construction staging at AAA Building, Grouting from Surface and instrumentation above cross passage
3 Relative Significance of Each Section 4(f) Property
Subsurface easements below historic properties
Beverly Hills High School (Building B1) and AAA Building
Perpetual Savings Bank, Beverly Hills High School, and AAA Building
Beverly Hills High School, AAA Building, and Tract 7710 Residential Grouping
Beverly Hills High School, AAA Building, and Tract 7710 Residential Grouping
Beverly Hills High School, AAA Building, and Tract 7710 Residential Grouping
Subsurface easements below Section 4(f) recreational properties
Beverly Hills High School Recreational Resources (future gymnasium and future half soccer field)
Beverly Hills High School Recreational Resources (future track, future baseball field, and future half soccer field)
Beverly Hills High School Recreational Resources (future track, future baseball field, and future half soccer field)
Beverly Hills High School Recreational Resources (future track, future baseball field, and future half soccer field)
Beverly Hills High School Recreational Resources (future track, future baseball field, and future half soccer field)
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 3 November 21, 2017
No Impact The Project (SEIS) Spalding (SEIS) Linden1 McCarty1 Camden1
4 The Official(s) with Jurisdiction
SHPO Finding of Effect concurrence
Assumed concurrence Assumed concurrence Assumed concurrence Assumed concurrence
BHUSD Does not support Support Support Support Support
City of Beverly Hills Does not support City has not commented on the Spaulding, Linden, McCarty , or Camden Alignments.
5 Meets the Purpose and Need for the Project
Travel time between Rodeo and UCLA Stations (min:sec))
5:14 5:36 5:29 5:35 5:16
Operating Concern - Radius less than 1,000 ft., passenger perception (slow speeds), wheel wear
Rmin=978 ft on BL track
Rmin=750 ft Rmin=825 ft Rmin=825 Rmin=825
Ridership 49,340 daily system boardings
Similar to the Project Similar to the Project Similar to the Project Similar to the Project
Additional travel time (hours per year) above The Project
0 350 240 330 30
Delay in realization of Project benefits
No delay delay delay delay delay
6 Magnitude of Other Adverse Impacts
Number of easements from commercial properties and schools (UCLA to Rodeo)
21 16 16 16 17
Number of easements from residential properties (UCLA to Rodeo)
89 95 109 117 116
Access shaft encroaches onto AT&T property
Access shaft is entirely within current staging site at 1950 Century Park East
Access shaft is entirely within current staging site at 1950 Century Park East
Access shaft on both 1950 Century Park East and AT&T property
Access shaft on both 1950 Century Park East and AT&T property
Access shaft on both 1950 Century Park East and AT&T property
Distance to known nearest oil wells (feet)
230 97 64 22 64
7 Differences in Costs (thousands of YOE dollars)
Alignment capital cost $2,411,000 $2,418,000 $2,421,000 $2,417,000 $2,391,000
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Page 4
1Alignments proposed by BHHS and modified by Metro 2Does not including Wolfskill 23 which is common to all alignments Best performing alternative for each factor is shown in BOLD.
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 5 November 21, 2017
REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED BY THE BEVERLY HILLS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Stone Consulting prepared four horizontal alignment alternatives for the Westside Purple Line Extension - Section 2 between Beverly Hills (Wilshire / Rodeo Station) and Century City (Constellation Station) (refer to Appendix H to letter from Beverly Hills Unified School District dated July 24, 2017), which are identified in the Metro analysis as:
S-1: Spalding Drive (this is a slightly different alignment from that evaluated in the Draft SEIS)
S-2: Linden Drive
S-3: Camden Drive
S-4: McCarty Drive
Alternatives S-1, S-2, and S-4 depart from Wilshire Boulevard at various locations and continue in a southerly direction before turning west-southwest then southwesterly into Century City/Constellation Station. Alternative S-3 Camden Drive is somewhat similar but instead departs from Wilshire Boulevard in a southwesterly direction before turning east then southwesterly into Constellation Station. Each of the four alternatives proposed by Stone Consulting has three horizontal curves with an identical radii o f 1,018.75 ft. (D = 5° 37’ 35”), 981.25 ft. (D = 5° 50’ 30”), and 1,018.75 ft. (D = 5° 37’ 35”). The anticipated operational speeds of these alternatives would be in the 40 mph to 45 mph range, roughly following those in the FEIS 2016 (Lasky) alignment or otherwise referred to as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). However, the four alignments, as presented, are not fully compliant with Metro Rail Design Criteria (MRDC) for the primary reason that none employ spirals1 to connect tangent tracks to curves.
Therefore, to properly analyze the BHUSD-proposed alternative alignments, Metro added spiral lengths to all curves to comply with MRDC. The spiral lengths were calculated to achieve the best possible operational speeds under some very restrictive conditions, primarily the relatively small tangent distances between reverse curves. In this analysis, the Northing and Easting horizontal coordinates of the Point of Intersection (P.I.) for each curve in the Stone Consulting alternative alignments was retained. In other words, while the alignment bearings and curve radii are maintained, the tangent distances between the end of one curve and the beginning of another are reduced because spirals have been added. The analysis for this approach - presented under the category “Original Alignment” – resulted in additional areas of non-compliance with MRDC as well as unacceptable design conditions (marked by sub-standard tangent lengths or overlapping spirals) in each of the four alternatives presented by Stone Consultants.
At this point, Metro opted to adjust some curve radii (and resulting spirals) while maintaining the Stone Consulting alignment bearings from P.I. to P.I. or P.I. to mid-platform with the objective to develop alternative alignments that would be fully MRDC compliant. This approach resulted in significant lowering of operational speeds but had the benefit of eliminating the unacceptable design conditions described above. Some of the revised tunnel radii fell short of the minimum bored tunnel radius of 1,000 feet2 as specified in MRDC, but did exceed 750 feet, which may be acceptable, pending approval by Metro of a Design Deviation. These modified alignments are referred to hereafter as “MRDC
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Page 6
Compliant Alignments.” Since the twin bores are approximately 39 ft. apart, the minimum radius for the wider curve on a parallel track would be 750.00 ft. + 39.00 ft. = 789.00 ft.
It should be noted that Metro follows a “speed code” sequence in its train operations. In other words, all curves must adhere to one of the specific speeds outlined in the code. The code stipulates the following speeds: 70mph, 55mph, 45 mph, 40 mph, 25 mph, 20 mph, and some lower speeds for yard movements and crossover interlocking operations.
The following describes the adjustments necessary to evaluate the original Stone alignments, followed by Metro adjustments to achieve MRDC compliant Stone alignments. The MRDC compliant alignments are then used as the basis for environmental analysis.
2.0 SPALDING DRIVE ALTERNATIVE
The Spalding Drive alternative begins its turn south from Wilshire Boulevard at approximately Roxbury Drive with a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. (Curve S-1.1) and then follows Spalding Drive a short distance before turning westerly under Beverly Hills High School with a track radius of 981.25 ft. (Curve S-1.2). The alignment quickly continues in a reverse curve (Curve S-1.3) having a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. in a direction southwesterly into Century City/Constellation Station. In the paragraphs below titled “Original Alignment” Characteristics and “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics, the Spalding Drive alternative is analyzed and the resulting issues discussed.
2.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics
When spirals are applied to the curves of the BHUSD-proposed alignment, a number of issues arise (refer to Alignment S-1 in Appendix A): 1) For example, even when the speeds of Curves S-1.2 and S-1.3 are reduced to 25 mph, the 75.00 ft. spirals3 of adjacent curves overlap creating an unacceptable design condition; 2) In order to maintain a speed of 45 mph in Curve S-1.1, an appropriate spiral length would be 220.00 ft. When coupled with a 25 mph Curve S-1.2 having a spiral length of 75.00 ft., the resulting tangent distance between the two curves would be approximately 99.56 ft. While this is compliant with MRDC, which calls for a minimum tangent distance of 75.00 ft4, it reduces the operational speed in the tangent section to 25 mph5; 3) Lastly, the end of the 75.00 ft. spiral of Curve S-1.3 is approximately 58.97 ft. from the Point of Switch of the double crossover just east of Constellation Station. This complies with MRDC, which calls for a minimum of 50.00 ft6. While this last point is not an issue with this particular alternative, it is necessary to take into consideration. It should be noted that the tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid-platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
2.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics
To make the BHUSD-proposed Spalding Drive alignment MRDC Compliant (that includes a deviation from the 1,000-foot minimum radius requirement requiring Metro approval) the radii of Curves S-1.2 and S-1.3 were reduced to 795.00 ft. and 789.00 ft., respectively, eliminating the unacceptable condition of overlapping spirals (See Alignment S-1 in Appendix A). The tangent distance between Curves S-1.2 and S-1.3 is now approximately 123.17 ft. which is slightly greater than the 120.00 ft. minimum tangent distance for a design speed of 40 mph (3V=3[40mph]=120.00 ft.)5. The radius of Curve S-1.1 remains unchanged but spirals are added to achieve a 45-mph operational speed. The resulting tangent distance between the end of Curve S-1.1 and the beginning of Curve S-1.2 is approximately 202.42 ft., well over
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 7 November 21, 2017
the minimum distance of 135.00 ft5 to maintain a speed of 45 mph. Lastly, the end of the 75.00 ft. spiral of Curve S-1.3 is now approximately 129.61 ft. from the Point of Switch of the double crossover just west of Constellation Station, well over the minimum distance of 50.00 ft6 called for in MRDC. It should be noted that the tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid-platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
3.0 LINDEN DRIVE ALTERNATIVE
The Linden Drive alternative begins its turn south from Wilshire Boulevard at approximately Bedford Drive with a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. (Curve S-2.1) and then follows Linden Drive a short distance before turning westerly under Beverly Hills High School with a track radius of 981.25 ft. (Curve S-2.2). The alignment quickly continues in a reverse curve (Curve S-2.3) having a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. in a direction southwesterly into Century City/Constellation Station. In the paragraphs below titled “Original Alignment” Characteristics and “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics, the Linden Drive alternative is analyzed and the resulting issues discussed.
3.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics
When spirals are applied to the curves of the BHUSD-proposed alignment, a number of issues arise (refer to Alternative S-2 in Appendix A): 1) For example, even when the speed of Curve S-2.3 is reduced to 25 mph, the 75.00 ft. spiral3 of that curve coupled with the 40 mph Curve S-2.2 with an appropriate spiral length of 160.00 ft. results in a tangent distance between the two curves of 60.59 ft., which does not meet the minimum tangent distance of 75.00 ft4 called for in MRDC; 2) In order to maintain a speed of 45 mph in Curve S-2.1, an appropriate spiral length would be 220.00 ft. When coupled with the 40 mph Curve S-2.2 having a spiral length of 160.00 ft., the resulting tangent distance between the two curves would be 81.55 ft. While this is compliant with MRDC, which calls for a minimum tangent distance of 75.00 ft,4 it would also reduce the operational speed through the tangent to 25 mph5; 3) Lastly, the end of the 75.00 ft. spiral of Curve S-2.3 overlaps into the double crossover just east of Constellation Station and, as a result, becomes unacceptable for operations. To comply wi th MRDC, this distance must be a minimum of 50.00 ft6 between the end of Curve S-2.3 and the Point of Switch of the double crossover. It should be noted that the tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid -platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
3.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics
To make the BHUSD-proposed Linden Drive alignment MRDC Compliant (that includes a deviation of the 1, 000-foot minimum radius requirement requiring Metro approval), the radii of Curves S-2.2 and S-2.3 were reduced to 920.00 ft. and 864.00 ft., respectively. The tangent distance between the end of the 40 mph Curve S-2.2 and the start of the 25 mph Curve S-2.3 is now 173.85 ft., well above the minimum tangent distance of 120.00 ft5 called for in MRDC to achieve 40 mph. The radius of Curve S-2.1 also remained the same, but spirals are added to achieve a 45-mph operational speed. Also, the resulting tangent distance between the end of Curve S-2.1 and the beginning of Curve S-2.2 is 137.47 ft., just over the minimum distance of 135.00 ft,5 to maintain a speed of 45 mph. Lastly, the end of the 75.00 ft. spiral of Curve S-2.3 is now approximately 52.11 ft. from the Point of Switch of the double crossover just west of Constellation Station, just over the minimum distance of 50.00 ft6 called for in the MRDC, eliminating the unacceptable condition of the spiral of Curve S-3.3 overlapping into the double crossover. It should
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Page 8
be noted that the tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid-platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
4.0 CAMDEN DRIVE ALTERNATIVE
The Camden Drive alternative begins its turn south from Wilshire Boulevard in the vicinity of El Camino Drive with a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. (Curve S-3.1) and then follows a diagonal path to the vicinity of Spalding Drive before turning westerly under Beverly Hills High School with a track radius of 981.25 ft. (Curve S-3.2). The alignment quickly continues in a reverse curve (Curve S-3.3) having a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. in a direction southwesterly into Century City/Constellation Station. In the paragraphs below titled “Original Alignment” Characteristics and “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics, the Camden Drive alternative is analyzed and the resulting issues discussed.
4.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics
When spirals are applied to the curves of the BHUSD-proposed alignment, a number of issues arise (refer to Alignment S-3 in Appendix A): 1) For example, even when the speeds of Curves S-3.2 and S-3.3 are reduced to 25 mph, the 75.00 ft. spirals3 of both curves will only allow a tangent distance of approximately 61.88 ft. between the two curves, which does not meet the minimum tangent distance of 75.00 ft4 called for in MRDC; 2) It should be noted that the design speed of Curve S-3.2 cannot be increased because any increase of curve radius and corresponding length of spiral would further impact the already sub-standard tangent distance of approximately 61.88 ft. (explained above); 3) As can be seen in Appendix A – Alternative S-3, the end of the 75.00 ft. spiral of Curve S-3.3 overlaps into the double crossover just east of Constellation Station and, as a result, becomes unacceptable for operations. To comply with MRDC, this distance must be a minimum of 50.00 ft6 between the end of Curve S-3.3 and the Point of Switch of the double crossover. On a positive note, the tangent distance between the end of Curve S-3.1 (45 mph) and start of Curve S-3.2. (25 mph) is approximately 2,152.16 ft., sufficient to allow trains to reach the maximum 70 mph operational speed for a portion of that distance. It should be noted that the tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid -platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
4.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics
To make the BHUSD-proposed Camden Drive alignment MRDC Compliant (that includes a deviation of the 1,000-foot minimum radius requirement requiring Metro approval), the radius of Curve S-3.3 was reduced to 825.00 ft. This eliminated the unacceptable condition of Curve S-3.3 overlapping into the double crossover (refer to Alignment S-3 in Appendix A) since the distance between the end of Curve S-3.3 and the Point of Switch of the double crossover is now approximately 66.56 ft., meeting the minimum tangent distance of 50.00 ft6 called for in MRDC. Lastly, the radius of Curve S-3.1 remained the same but, as with the previous alternatives, 220 ft. spirals are added to achieve a 45-mph operational speed. Between the end of 40 mph Curve S-3.2 and start of 25 mph Curve S-3.3, the tangent distance is now approximately 91.16 ft., meeting the minimum MRDC requirement of 75.00 ft. 4 but also limiting the operational speed in that tangent distance to 25 mph5. Furthermore, this speed reduction has a significant adverse effect to the overall running time of the Camden Drive Alternative since trains must decelerate from 40 mph to 25 mph before reaching the end of Curve S-3.2. It should be noted that the tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid-platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 9 November 21, 2017
5.0 MCCARTY DRIVE ALTERNATIVE
The McCarty Drive alternative begins its turn south from Wilshire Boulevard at approximately Peck Drive with a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. (Curve S-4.1) and then follows McCarty Drive a short distance before turning westerly under Beverly Hills High School with a track radius of 981.25 ft. (Curve S-4.2). The alignment quickly continues in a reverse curve (Curve S-4.3) having a track radius of 1,018.75 ft. in a direction southwesterly into Century City/Constellation Station. In the paragraphs below titled “Original Alignment” Characteristics and “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristics, the McCarty Drive alternative is analyzed and the resulting issues discussed.
5.1 “Original Alignment” Characteristics
When spirals are applied to the curves of the BHUSD-proposed alignment, a number of issues arise (refer to Appendix A – Alignment S-4): 1) For example, even when the speed of Curve S-4.3 is reduced to 25 mph in an attempt to minimize impacting the double crossover just east of Century City/Constellation Station, the resulting 75.00 ft. spiral3 of that curve still overlaps into the double crossover and, as a result, becomes unacceptable for operation. To comply with MRDC, the distance between the end of Curve S-4.3 and the Point of Switch of the double crossover must be a minimum of 50.00 ft6; 2) In order to maintain a speed of 45 mph in Curve S-4.1, an appropriate length is 220.00 ft. When coupled with 40 mph Curve S-4.2 having an acceptable spiral length of 160.00 ft., the resulting tangent distance between the two curves is approximately 81.70 ft. While this is compliant with MRDC, which calls for a mini mum tangent distance of 75.00 ft,4 it also reduces the operational speed through the tangent to 25 mph, 5 which will adversely affect the operational running time of the alternative. On the positive side, the 25 mph Curve S-4.3 with a spiral length of 75.00 ft3 coupled with 40 mph Curve S-4.2 with a spiral length of 160.00 ft. results in a tangent distance between the two curves of approximately 391.05 ft., which more than meets the minimum tangent distance of 225.00 ft5, sufficient to allow a potential design speed of 75 mph. Lastly, it should be noted that the tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid -platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
5.2 “MRDC Compliant Alignment” Characteristic
To make the BHUSD-proposed McCarty Drive alignment MRDC Compliant (that includes a deviation of the 1, 000-foot minimum radius requirement requiring Metro approval), the radius of Curve S-4.3 was reduced 825.00 ft. The end of the 75.00 ft. spiral of Curve S-4.3 is now approximately 66.56 ft. from the Point of Switch of the double crossover just west of Constellation Station, just over the minimum distance of 50.00 ft6 called for in MRDC, eliminating the unacceptable condition of the spiral of Curve S-4.3 overlapping into the double crossover. The tangent distance between the end of the 40 mph Curve S-4.2 and the start of the 25 mph Curve S-4.3 is now approximately 462.83 ft., well above the minimum tangent distance of 225.00 ft5 called for in the MRDC to achieve the standard 75 mph design speed. The radius of Curve S-4.1 also remained the same but, as in the paragraph above, 220.00 ft. spirals are added to maintain a 45-mph operational speed, and the resulting tangent distance between the end of Curve S-4.1 and the beginning of Curve S-4.2 remains at approximately 81.70 ft., just over the minimum tangent distance of 75.00 ft4 but also just sufficient enough to maintain a speed of 25 mph5. This speed reduction has a significant adverse effect to the overall running time of the McCarty Drive Alternative since trains must decelerate from 45 mph to 25 mph before reaching the end of Curve S-4.1 and begin accelerating from 25 mph to 40 mph at the beginning of Curve S-4.2. Lastly, it should be noted that the
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Page 10
tangent distances between P.I. and P.I. or between mid-platform and P.I. remained consistent with the original BHUSD-proposed alignment.
6.0 ANALYSIS OF METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA
The analysis of the four Alignment Alternatives had the objective to review these alignments for compliance with Metro Rail Design Criteria. None of these alignments employed spiral lengths for transitioning from a tangent alignment into a curve or from a curve into a tangent alignment, which MRDC stipulates is mandatory for all horizontal curves. When spirals were added to the curve radii, the operational speed of the trains was adversely impacted. In addition, the inclusion of spiral distances also caused the alignments to infringe on MRDC minimum tangent distances between reverse curves or between the end of a curve and point of switch in the double crossover just east of Century City/Constellation Station. To properly evaluate each alternative alignment, Metro adjusted the alignments to improve curve radii and corresponding spiral lengths to achieve the maximum operating speeds available to conditions that were often very restrictive. In each alternative, the distance and bearing between the points of intersection of curves or between the mid-platform and point of intersection of a curve adhered to the original data provided in the BHUSD-proposed alternative alignments (refer to Appendix B).
As can be seen in Appendix A, the overall running time of the Stone Consulting alternative alignments between Wilshire/Rodeo Station in Beverly Hills and Century City/Constellation Station (after being adjusted for compliancy with MRDC) varied between 2 minutes 36 seconds for Camden Drive and 2 minutes 54 seconds for McCarty Drive. The FEIS 2016 (Lasky) alignment, on the other hand, covers this segment in 2 minutes 33 seconds, slightly less time than Camden Drive.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
1MRDC Section 4.1.6.3.C.3 states that “Spirals shall be used to connect tangents to superelevated curves on main tracks to provide the superelevation run-off and reduce the flange/rail impact at the beginning of the curve. The length of the spiral shall be sufficient to accommodate full superelevation run -off.”
2MRDC Section 4.1.6.3.A.3 states that “Minimum radius for both LRT and HRV alignment in bored tunnels shall be 1,000 ft.; sharper curvature shall be justified per boring machine specifications and approved by Metro.”
3MRDC Section 4.1.6.3.C.6 states that “Minimum length spiral shall be 100 ft. for LRT systems and 75 ft. for HRT.”
4MRDC Section 4.1.6.3.A.2 states that “Minimum length [of tangent] shall be 100 ft. for LRT systems and 75 ft. for HRT.”
5MRDC Section 4.1.6.3.A.1 states that “Length of tangent shall be defined as L=3V, Where L is length in feet, V is design speed in MPH.”
6MRDC Section 4.2.11.2 states that “Minimum length of tangent between any point of switch and beginning of horizontal or vertical curve shall be 50 ft.”
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 11 November 21, 2017
APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS HORIZONTAL CURVE ANALYSIS SERVICE SPEED ANALYSIS WILSHIRE / RODEO STATION TO CENTURY CITY / CONSTELLATION STATION
8/22/2017 PZ
ANALYSIS MATRIX
DESCRIPTION
RUNNING DWELL1 RUNNING TIME PLUS DWELL TIME AVERAG E SPEED AVERAG E SPEED
ALTERNATIVE TOTAL TOTAL TIME TIME BEVERLY H ILLS BEVERLY H ILLS MINIMUM REASON
ALIGNMENT SEGMENT SEGMENT TRAIN TRAIN TOTAL TOTAL CONVERTED TO TO TO CURVE FOR
STUDY2 DISTANCE DISTANCE MOVING STOPPED TIME TIME MIN AND SEC CENTURY CITY CENTURY CITY RADIUS ELIMINATION
(FT) (MI) (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (MIN) (MIN) (SEC) (FT/SEC) (MPH) (FT)
S-1 (ORIGINAL) SPALDING DRIVE 6,865.07 1.30 152.3 30.0 182.3 3.04 3 2 45.1 30.7 981.25 SPIRALS OVERLAP FOR CURVES S-1.2 AND S-1.3
S-1 (MRDC COMPLIANT) SPALDING DRIVE 6,929.55 1.31 135.8 30.0 165.8 2.76 2 46 51.0 34.8 789.00
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] CENTURY CITY TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 9,553.10 1.81 130.3 30.0 160.3 2.67 2 40 73.3 50.0 920.00
S-13
+ FEIS 2012 (LASKY) BEVERLY HILLS TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 16,482.65 3.12 266.2 60.0 326.2 5.4 5 26 61.9 42.2
S-2 (ORIGINAL) LINDEN DRIVE 6,874.97 1.30 139.0 30.0 169.0 2.82 2 49 49.5 33.7 981.25 SPIRAL FOR CURVE S-2.3 EXTENDS INTO DOUBLE CROSSOVER
S-2 (MRDC COMPLIANT) LINDEN DRIVE 6,905.79 1.31 138.8 30.0 168.8 2.81 2 49 49.7 33.9 825.00
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] CENTURY CITY TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 9,553.10 1.81 130.3 30.0 160.3 2.67 2 40 73.3 50.0 920.00
S-23
+ FEIS 2012 (LASKY) BEVERLY HILLS TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 16,458.89 3.12 269.2 60.0 329.2 5.5 5 29 61.1 41.7
S-3 (ORIGINAL) CAMDEN DRIVE 6,332.77 1.20 137.0 30.0 167.0 2.78 2 47 46.2 31.5 981.25 SPIRAL FOR CURVE S-3.3 EXTENDS INTO DOUBLE CROSSOVER
S-3 (MRDC COMPLIANT) CAMDEN DRIVE 6,338.84 1.20 125.9 30.0 155.9 2.60 2 36 50.4 34.3 825.00
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] CENTURY CITY TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 9,553.10 1.81 130.3 30.0 160.3 2.67 2 40 73.3 50.0 920.00
S-33 + FEIS 2012 (LASKY) BEVERLY HILLS TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 15,891.94 3.01 256.2 60.0 316.2 5.3 5 16 62.0 42.3
S-4 (ORIGINAL) McCARTY DRIVE 6,875.14 1.30 141.0 30.0 171.0 2.85 2 51 48.8 33.2 981.25 SPIRAL FOR CURVE S-4.3 EXTENDS INTO DOUBLE CROSSOVER
S-4 (MRDC COMPLIANT) McCARTY DRIVE 6,881.21 1.30 144.3 30.0 174.3 2.90 2 54 47.7 32.5 825.00
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] CENTURY CITY TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 9,553.10 1.81 130.3 30.0 160.3 2.67 2 40 73.3 50.0 920.00
S-43 + FEIS 2012 (LASKY) BEVERLY HILLS TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 16,434.31 3.11 274.6 60.0 334.6 5.6 5 35 59.8 40.8
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] BEVERLY HILLS TO CENTURY CITY 6,832.71 1.29 123.5 30.0 153.5 2.56 2 33 55.3 37.7 1,022.00
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] CENTURY CITY TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 9,553.10 1.81 130.3 30.0 160.3 2.67 2 40 73.3 50.0 920.00
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] BEVERLY HILLS TO WESTWOOD / UCLA 16,385.81 3.10 253.8 60.0 313.8 5.2 5 14 64.6 44.0
1DWELL TIME = 15 SECONDS AT END STATIONS AND 30 SECONDS AT INTERMEDIATE STATIONS (BETWEEN TWO STATIONS IT WOULD BE: 15 SECONDS + 15 SECONDS = 30 SECONDS).
2ALL ALIGNMENTS BETWEEN CENTURY CITY / CONSTELLATION AND WESTWOOD / UCLA ARE THE SAME.
3METRO COMPLIANT ALIGNMENT
SUMMARY TABLE: BEVERLY HILLS TO CENTURY CITY ONLY
DESCRIPTION
RUNNING DWELL1 RUNNING TIME PLUS DWELL TIME AVERAG E SPEED AVERAG E SPEED
REMARKS
ALTERNATIVE TOTAL TOTAL TIME TIME BEVERLY H ILLS BEVERLY H ILLS MINIMUM
ALIGNMENT SEGMENT SEGMENT TRAIN TRAIN TOTAL TOTAL CONVERTED TO TO TO CURVE
STUDY DISTANCE DISTANCE MOVING STOPPED TIME TIME MIN AND SEC CENTURY CITY CENTURY CITY RADIUS (FT) (MI) (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (MIN) (MIN) (SEC) (FT/SEC) (MPH) (FT)
S-1 (MRDC COMPLIANT) SPALDING DRIVE 6,929.55 1.31 135.8 30.0 165.8 2.8 2 46 51.0 34.8 789.00 CURVES S-1.2 AND S-1.3 REDUCED TO ELIMINATE OVERLAPING SPIRALS
S-2 (MRDC COMPLIANT) LINDEN DRIVE 6,905.79 1.31 138.8 30.0 168.8 2.8 2 49 49.7 33.9 825.00 CURVES S-2.2 AND S-2.3 REDUCED TO ELIMINATE SPIRAL OF S-2.3 IN TURNOUT
S-3 (MRDC COMPLIANT) CAMDEN DRIVE 6,338.84 1.20 125.9 30.0 155.9 2.6 2 36 50.4 34.3 825.00 CURVES S-3.2 AND S-3.3 REDUCED TO ELIMINATE SPIRAL OF S-3.3 IN TURNOUT
S-4 (MRDC COMPLIANT) McCARTY DRIVE 6,881.21 1.30 144.3 30.0 174.3 2.9 2 54 47.7 32.5 825.00 CURVES S-4.2 AND S-4.3 REDUCED TO ELIMINATE SPIRAL OF S-4.3 IN TURNOUT
FEIS 2016 (LASKY) [LPA] BEVERLY HILLS TO CENTURY CITY 6,832.71 1.29 123.5 30.0 153.5 2.6 2 33 55.3 37.7 1,022.00
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Page 12
GENERAL METHODOLOGY SUMMARY (METHODOLOGY PRESENTED IN GREATER DETAIL IN MEMORANDUM TEXT) 1) "ORIGINAL" ALIGNMENT
THE "ORIGINAL" ALIGNMENT CHARACTERISTICS PRESENTED IN THE MATRIX ABOVE ARE THE RESULT OF ANALYSIS BY WSP THAT REPLICATED THE CURVE RADII AND TANGENT BEARINGS FROM BHUSD. HOWEVER TO BE COMPLIANT WITH METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA (MRDC) SPIRALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ADDED TO ALL CURVES. THE SPIRALS FOR EACH CURVE WERE DEVELOPED TO ACHIEVE MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL SPEED GIVEN THE LIMITED SPACE AVAILABLE WHICH IN SOME CASES RESULTED IN A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN SPEED. EVEN WITH THIS EFFORT THERE WERE SEVERAL INSTANCES WHERE THE DESIGN WOULS NOT BE COMPLIANT WITH METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA.
2) "MRDC COMPLIANT" ALIGNMENT THE "MRDC COMPLIANT" ALIGNMENT CHARACTERISTICS IN THE MATRIX ABOVE INVOLVED ADJUSTING THE CURVE RADII FROM BHUSD TO ACHIEVE AN ALIGNMENT THAT WAS FULLY COMPLIANT WITH METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA. THE OPERATIONAL SPEED WAS SIGNIFICANTLY
AFFECTED. FOR EXAMPLE, WHILE THE CAMDEN DRIVE ALIGNMENT IS APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SHORTER THAN THE LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (LPA), IT TAKES TWO AND ONE HALF SECONDS LONGER.
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 13 November 21, 2017
REVIEW OF HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORDS FOR ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED BY THE BEVERLY HILLS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Stone Consulting prepared four horizontal alignment alternatives for the Westside Purple Line Extension - Section 2 between Beverly Hills (Wilshire / Rodeo Station) and Century City (Constellation Station) (refer to Appendix H to letter from Beverly Hills Unified School District dated July 24, 2017), which are identified in the Metro analysis as:
S-1: Spalding Drive (this is a slightly different alignment from that evaluated in the Draft SEIS)
S-2: Linden Drive
S-3: Camden Drive
S-4: McCarty Drive
The Linden, Camden, and McCarty Drive alignments cross a portion of Beverly Hills south and east of the Project’s area of potential effect (APE) and outside of the area reviewed by Metro for National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible historic properties.
2.0 HISTORIC PROPERTY RECORD
The City of Beverly Hills identified a potential NRHP-eligible historic district in a 2004 Historic Resources Survey Report. The City’s report identified an area bounded by Gre gory Way, El Camino Drive, the alley north of Olympic Boulevard, and the first row of properties west of Linden Drive as the Tract 7710 Residential Grouping (BH 2004). The survey describes the grouping as follows:
The district boundaries contain a highly representative grouping of residential architecture designed primarily in the Spanish Colonial Revival style in Beverly Hills in the 1920s and 1930s. Additionally, the overall integrity of the grouping and remaining district contributors is high. In compari son with other residences and neighborhoods identified in the City during the 1985-86 survey process, the Tract 7710 Residential Grouping exists today as one of the best examples of a neighborhood of generously-scaled, Spanish Colonial Revival dwellings, with a high degree of integrity, remaining in Beverly Hills… The level streets are lined by parkways and punctuated by street trees. The majority of the residences are amply -sized, two-story homes that are typically rectangular or L-shaped (with courtyard) in plan. Spanish Colonial Revival styling, more than any other characteristic of the district, is its unifying feature.
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
November 21, 2017
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
Page 14
Figure 1. City-identified Boundary of Tract 7710 Residential Grouping
The findings from the 2004 Historic Resources Survey Report were augmented by reviewing historic resources data from the City of Beverly Hills GIS database (BH 2017). The database provides historic survey data and historic eligibility status for individual properties within the city that have been surveyed. For the majority of the properties within the boundaries of the 7710 Residential Grouping identified above, the database contains a status code description of “Appears eligible for the National Register as a contributor to a National Register eligible district through survey evaluation”. The Linden, McCarty, and Camden alignments would all require subsurface easements from one or more properties within this grouping.
The GIS database also contains historic survey data for properties between Linden Drive and S. Moreno Drive. Several properties in this area are identified with a status code description of “Properties Recognized as Historically Significant by Local Government. Appears to be a contributor to a district that appears eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation”. Per this designation, the City of Beverly Hills has identified a historic district eligible for local listing, but not NRHP-eligible that is located west of the potential NRHP-eligible Tract 7710 Residential Grouping district.
3.0 SUMMARY
The review of City of Beverly Hills Records identified a potential NRHP-eligible historic district bounded by Gregory Way, El Camino Drive, the alley north of Olympic Boulevard. This is consistent with the findings of the Projects’ Section 106 process that did not identify an NRHP -eligible historic district within the APE.
Review of the Alternatives proposed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T
Page 15 November 21, 2017
References:
BH 2004 City of Beverly Hills (BH). Historic Resources Survey Report: Part I: Historic Resources Survey Update and Part II: Area 4 Multi-family Residence Survey. Prepared by PCR Services Corporation for City of Beverly Hills Planning and Community Development Department. June 2004.
BH 2017 City of Beverly Hills (BH). Virtual Beverly Hills. GIS Database. http://gis.beverlyhills.org/VBH/HistoricResource/iOS/app.html. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
WESTSIDE PURPLE LINE EXTENSION PROJECT, SECTION 2 ADVANCED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Contract No. PS‐4350‐2000
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East Task No. xx.xx.xxx
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Review Copy
Date Initials
Originator
Checker
Back Checker
Verified by
October 24, 2017
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East
Table of Contents
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T Page i October 24, 2017
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 TBM LAUNCH BOX FULL CLOSURE (STAGE 5) ............................................................................ 3
3.0 TBM LAUNCH BOX AND CENTURY PARK EAST FULL CLOSURES (STAGE 5) ................................. 5
List of Tables Table 1‐1: TBM Launch Box Full Closure Level of Service Results ................................................................ 3
Table 2‐1: TBM Launch Box and Century Park East Full Closure Level of Service Results ............................ 6
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T October 24, 2017 Page ii
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East Table of Contents
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East
1.0 - Introduction
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T Page 1 October 24, 2017
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This technical memorandum builds off the updated traffic analysis that was previously prepared and presented in the technical memorandum dated January 25, 2017. The previous traffic analysis updated the existing traffic conditions in 2016 at the Century City/Constellation Station area to take into consideration the opening and operation of a medical rehabilitation facility at the northeast corner of Century Park East and Olympic Boulevard. The results of the updated existing conditions traffic analysis were presented in the January 25, 2017 technical memorandum. Using that information, an updated traffic analysis was also prepared for the TBM Launch Box Full Closure construction stage (Stage 5), which consisted of the rerouting of traffic due to the construction activity. The TBM Launch Box Full Closure construction stage (Stage 5) closes the full width of Constellation Boulevard between Century Park East and the underground parking garage entrance to 10100 Constellation Boulevard. However, this construction stage keeps the through traffic movement along Century Park East open between Santa Monica Boulevard and Olympic Boulevard because the staging area sites that support tunneling activities are located along private properties east of Century Park East and adjacent to the Beverly Hills High School property.
During the public review phase of the Draft SEIS, the Beverly Hills High School voiced concerns over the location of the staging area sites that are adjacent to the school's property. In response to this concern, a proposal to shift the construction staging area sites that support tunneling activities away from the school's property is being considered; however, this proposed approach would utilize Century Park East as a staging area to support tunneling activities thus requiring the full closure of Century Park East at Constellation Boulevard. Due to this complete closure of Century Park East at Constellation Boulevard, northbound traffic from Olympic Boulevard and southbound traffic from Santa Monica Boulevard passing through the Century Park East and Constellation Boulevard intersection would be diverted around this roadway closure. A traffic analysis of this proposed condition was performed and is presented in the following sections. This full closure condition of Century Parke East is also compared to the previously analyzed TBM launch box full closure construction stage (Stage 5).
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T October 24, 2017 Page 2
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East 1.0 – Introduction
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East
2.0 - TBM Launch Box Full Closure (Stage 5)
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T Page 3 October 24, 2017
2.0 TBM LAUNCH BOX FULL CLOSURE (STAGE 5)
Work area during this stage will be across the full width of Constellation Boulevard between Century Park East and the underground parking garage entrance to 10100 Constellation Boulevard. During this stage, the construction activity consists of decking installation of the TBM launch box. This will require a full closure of Constellation Boulevard between Century Park East and the underground parking garage entrance to 10100 Constellation Boulevard. The affected travel control zone will extend from approximately east of Avenue of the Stars to the west and Century Park East to the east.
During this construction stage, northbound and southbound traffic turning westbound onto Constellation Boulevard from Century Park East will be diverted around the construction area and use Avenue of the Stars to get to their destination. Similarly, eastbound traffic on Constellation Boulevard will be detoured before crossing Avenue of the Stars, although local access traffic destined to the buildings along this segment of Constellation Boulevard will be permitted to continue straight through Avenue of the Stars until reaching the entrance of the underground parking garage at 10100 Constellation Boulevard. Access will be maintained to all driveways, alleys, and garage entrances at all times.
All work performed during this stage will occur over several weekends from Friday 9:00 pm to Monday 6:00 am, with lanes becoming operational on Monday at 6:00 am. However, if there is a change in this proposed schedule and the full closure extends to the weekday AM and/or PM peak hours, then the level of service results of the intersection operating conditions, due to the potential full closure along Constellation Boulevard, are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: TBM Launch Box Full Closure Level of Service Results
Intersection
TBM Launch Box Full Closure
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS Delay LOS Delay
Century Park East/Santa Monica Blvd E 79.9 F 201.0
Century Park East/Constellation Blvd A 8.3 A 7.3
Century Park East/Olympic Blvd D 49.1 D 46.6
Avenue of the Stars/Santa Monica Blvd F 144.6 F 100.6
Avenue of the Stars/Constellation Blvd E 56.6 D 44.5
Avenue of the Stars/WB Olympic Blvd C 28.6 A 9.2
Avenue of the Stars/EB Olympic Blvd C 28.1 D 41.4
Century Park West/Santa Monica Blvd F 135.0 F 155.9
Century Park West/Constellation Blvd A 7.8 D 49.7
Century Park West/Olympic Blvd E 79.9 E 78.7
During this construction period, with a proposed AM and PM peak period full closure of Constellation Boulevard from Century Park East to the underground parking garage entrance, traffic operations at the
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T October 24, 2017 Page 4
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East 1.0 – TBM Launch Box Full Closure (Stage 5)
intersection of Century Park East and Olympic Boulevard would improve to LOS D during the AM and PM peak hours. Also, all the three intersections along Santa Monica Boulevard would continue to operate at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours, except for the AM peak hour at the intersection of Century Park East and Santa Monica Boulevard which would improve to LOS E. In addition, the intersection of Century Park West and Olympic Boulevard would improve to LOS E in the AM peak hour and the intersection of Century Park West and Constellation Boulevard would improve to LOS D in the PM peak hour. Also, the intersection of Avenue of the Stars and Constellation Boulevard would deteriorate to LOS E in the AM peak hour. The remaining three study intersections would continue to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours.
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East
3.0 - TBM Launch Box and Century Park East Full Closures (Stage 5)
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T Page 5 October 24, 2017
3.0 TBM Launch Box and Century Park East Full Closures (Stage 5)
Work area during this stage for the TBM launch box will be across the full width of Constellation Boulevard between Century Park East and the underground parking garage entrance to 10100 Constellation Boulevard and the proposed construction staging area site needed to support tunneling activities will be across the full width of Century Park East at the Constellation Boulevard intersection. This stage will require a full closure of Constellation Boulevard between Century Park East and the underground parking garage entrance to 10100 Constellation Boulevard and a full closure of Century Park East in the vicinity of the Constellation Boulevard intersection. The affected travel control zone on Constellation Boulevard will extend from approximately east of Avenue of the Stars to the west, and Century Park East to the east. The affected travel control zone on Century Park East will extend just north and south of the intersection of Century Park East and Constellation Boulevard. Under this alternative, northbound and southbound through traffic along Century Park East will be restricted, while local building access will remain open through the duration of the construction. Buildings to the north of Century Park East and Constellation Boulevard will be accessed via Santa Monica Boulevard, and buildings to the south of the intersection will be accessed via Olympic Boulevard.
During this construction stage, northbound and southbound traffic along Century Park East traveling through the Constellation Boulevard intersection will be detoured around the construction staging area. Traffic coming from and going towards the east will be diverted outside the study area and traffic coming from and going towards the west and south will be diverted using Olympic Boulevard, Avenue of the Stars, and Santa Monica Boulevard to travel around the construction area. Local access traffic destined to the buildings along Century Park East will also be diverted around the Century Park East full closure in a similar manner to reach their final destination. Similar to the Stage 5 condition presented in the previous section, eastbound traffic on Constellation Boulevard will be detoured before crossing Avenue of the Stars, although local access traffic destined to the buildings along the eastern segment of Constellation Boulevard will be permitted to continue straight through the Avenue of the Stars intersection until reaching the entrance of the underground parking garage at 10100 Constellation Boulevard. Access will be maintained to all driveways, alleys, and garage entrances at all times.
The proposed construction staging area site on Century Park East will be a long term condition (three to four years) with the full closure of the roadway affecting traffic flow patterns during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Consequently, the level of service results of the intersection operating conditions, due to the potential full closures along both Constellation Boulevard and Century Park East are presented in Table 2.
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T October 24, 2017 Page 6
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East 3.0 – TBM Launch Box and Century Park East Full Closures (Stage 5)
Table 2: TBM Launch Box and Century Park East Full Closure Level of Service Results
Intersection
TBM Launch Box and Century Park East Full Closure
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS Delay LOS Delay
Century Park East/Santa Monica Blvd F 120.6 F 216.7
Century Park East/Constellation Blvd Closed Due to Construction Staging Area
Century Park East/Olympic Blvd F 133.2 D 36.4
Avenue of the Stars/Santa Monica Blvd F 124.5 F 92.2
Avenue of the Stars/Constellation Blvd F 146.8 F 112.2
Avenue of the Stars/WB Olympic Blvd F 206.6 F 99.0
Avenue of the Stars/EB Olympic Blvd C 29.4 E 61.4
Century Park West/Santa Monica Blvd F 135.6 F 155.5
Century Park West/Constellation Blvd A 7.9 D 49.3
Century Park West/Olympic Blvd E 77.0 E 78.7
During this construction period, with a proposed AM and PM peak period full closure of Constellation Boulevard from Century Park East to the underground parking garage entrance along with the full closure of Century Park East at Constellation Boulevard, traffic operations would deteriorate at several intersection locations when compared with the previous Stage 5 condition. Comparing to existing conditions, the full closure of both Constellation Boulevard and Century Park East would result in the deterioration of LOS during both the AM and PM peak hours at two intersections; the full closure of Constellation Boulevard would only result in deterioration at one intersection, during the AM peak hour. In addition, the full closure of both Constellation Boulevard and Century Park East would result in five intersections with increased vehicle delay of more than twenty (20) seconds; the full closure of Constellation Boulevard would only result in two intersections with increased vehicle delay of more than twenty (20) seconds.
The intersection of Century Park East and Santa Monica Boulevard would operate at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours, with increased delay during both the AM and PM peak hours. The intersection of Century Park East and Olympic Boulevard would deteriorate to LOS F during the AM peak hour, with increased delay during the AM peak hour. Traffic operations at the Avenue of the Stars and Constellation Boulevard and at the Avenue of the Stars and the Westbound Olympic Boulevard Ramp intersections would deteriorate to LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours, with increased delay during both the AM and PM peak hours. These two locations show a substantial change in delay from the previous Stage 5 condition due to the anticipated traffic diversions. The traffic operations at the intersection of Avenue of the Stars and the Eastbound Olympic Boulevard Ramp would deteriorate to LOS E in the PM peak hour.
As a result of the traffic diversions, queues at several of the intersection locations with LOS F were compared to the available storage length for adequacy. This queue assessment yielded the following results:
Updated Traffic Analysis Due to Construction Activities along Century Park East
3.0 - TBM Launch Box and Century Park East Full Closures (Stage 5)
W E S T S I D E P U R P L E L I N E E X T E N S I O N P R O J E C T Page 7 October 24, 2017
At the intersection of Century Park East and Santa Monica Boulevard, vehicular queues for the eastbound right turn movement and for the eastbound through movement extend beyond the Avenue of the Stars intersection during the AM peak hour and the PM peak hour, respectively. The results are similar to the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario in terms of the queues extending beyond the Avenue of the Stars intersection. However, due to the full closure of Century Park East, the eastbound right turn queues are about 40% longer than for the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario.
At the intersection of Century Park East and Olympic Boulevard, vehicular queues for the northbound left turn movement extend beyond the left turn lane storage length and into the through lanes during the AM peak hour. These results are also similar to the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario in terms of the queues extending beyond the left turn lane storage length and into the through lanes. However, due to the full closure of Century Park East, the northbound left turn queues are about 85% longer than for the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario.
At the intersection of Avenue of the Stars and Santa Monica Boulevard, the eastbound right turn queues extend beyond the available storage length and may potential block driveways providing access to the Century City Center Shopping Plaza. For the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario, the eastbound right turn queues are accommodated within the available storage length.
At the intersection of Avenue of the Stars and the Westbound Olympic Boulevard Ramp, vehicular queues for the southbound left turn movement extend beyond the left turn lane storage length and into the through lanes during the PM peak hour. For the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario, the southbound left turn queues are accommodated within the available storage length. The westbound right turn queue extends beyond the westbound Olympic Boulevard on‐ramp and onto Olympic Boulevard itself and all the way beyond the Century Park East intersection in the AM peak hour. For the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario, the westbound right turn queue also extends beyond the westbound Olympic Boulevard on‐ramp and onto Olympic Boulevard itself, however, the queue does not reach the Century Park East intersection. Due to the full closure of Century Park East and the redistribution of traffic, the westbound right turn queues are about 275% longer than for the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario.
At the intersection of Avenue of the Stars and the Eastbound Olympic Boulevard Ramp, vehicular queues for the southbound left turn movement extend beyond the left turn lane storage length and into the through lanes during the PM peak hour. These queues extend all the way back to the Westbound Olympic Boulevard Ramp intersection. These results are similar to the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario in terms of the queues extending beyond the left turn lane storage length and into the through lanes. However, due to the full closure of Century Park East, the southbound left turn queues are about 62% longer than for the TBM Launch Box Full Closure scenario.
HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT:
PART I: HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE
PART II: AREA 4 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE SURVEY
City of Beverly Hills
Prepared for
City of Beverly HillsPlanning and Community Development Department455 North Rexford DriveBeverly Hills, California 90210
Prepared by
PCR Services CorporationOne Venture, Suite 150Irvine, California 92618
June 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1
I. INTRODUCTION 1A. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 1B. PROJECT BACKGROUND 1C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3D. PROJECT LOCATION 3
II. PROJECT METHODOLOGY 4A. PREVIOUS SURVEY METHODOLOGY 4B. PRE-FIELD RESEARCH 4C. FIELDWORK 4D. PHOTOGRAPHY 5E. RESEARCH ANT) EVALUATION 5F. DATABASE 5G. PREPARATION OF FINAL PRODUCTS 5
III. HISTORIC CONTEXT 7
IV. ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER 17ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTURAL STYLES 17
V. DEFINITIONS AN]) CRITERIA 19A. NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA 19B. EVALUATION OF INTEGRITY 19C. RELOCATION 21D. CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA 22E. CALIFORNIA OFFICE ofHISTORICAL PRESERVATION SURVEY
METHODOLOGY 22F. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 23
VI. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 25A. SURVEY RESULTS 25B. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE 25C. AREA 4 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE SURVEY 41
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS 51A. INTRODUCTION 51B. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE 51C. AREA 4 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE SURVEY 52D. PRESERVATION STRATEGIES 52
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VIII. APPENDICES 54Appendix A: National Register Status Codes CategoriesAppendix B: Database Property Listing: Historic Resources Survey UpdateAppendix C: Database Property Listing: Area 4 Multi-Family Residence SurveyAppendix D: Database Property Listing: Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey,
Potential Historic DistrictsAppendix E: Historic Resources Survey Update. State Inventory Forms—DPR 523L
Forms 55Appendix F: Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey. State Inventory Forms—DPR
523A Forms
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Historic Resources Survey Update and the Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey ofthe City of Beverly Hills was prepared by PCR Services Corporation for the City of BeverlyHills. The survey efforts were intended by the City to serve as a foundation for future land useand historic preservation decisions. There were two surveys associated with the project: Parts Iand II. Part I involved a Historic Resources Survey Update that re-identified and re-evaluated386 historic resources previously identified in the mid-1980s including individual properties,community design features, and historic districts for federal, state, and/or local significance. PartII consisted of an Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey involving a reconnaissance-levelsurvey of all individual multi-family residences located within Area 4 of the City (south ofWilshire Boulevard within the City’s east, west, and south municipal boundaries) constructedprior to 1961. An important element of the Area 4 survey process was the preliminaryidentification ofpotential historic districts and their associated contributors.
Project methodology, as called for in the scope of work, included a review of existingdocumentation on properties within the survey areas; reconnaissance-level surveys; photographicdocumentation of buildings, structures, and neighborhoods; and additional research to assessarchitectural quality and integrity. Identified properties were evaluated for significanceaccording to the National Register of Historic Places Criteria, Title 10 of the Beverly HillsMunicipal Code, and for eligibility for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources.All properties were evaluated for historic significance in accordance with the Office of HistoricPreservation’s Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Results of the survey workwere recorded on the appropriate State of California Historic Resources Inventory forms (DPR523 forms).
Part I: Historic Resources Survey Update
• 386 historic resources were re-evaluated;
• 5 individual properties had been listed in the National Register;
• 4 individual properties and 1 community design feature were determined eligible forNational Register listing by a federal agency;
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
• 159 individual properties appeared to be contributors to National Register eligibledistricts, 4 of which also appeared to be eligible for local designation;
• 29 individual properties, 2 community design features, and 7 historic districtsappeared to be eligible for local listing;
• 68 individual properties appeared to be contributors to districts eligible for locallisting;
• 28 individual properties were not evaluated due to restricted views from the publicright-of-way or due to renovation/construction activity;
• 28 individual properties had been demolished since the previous survey.
Part II: Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey
• 622 individual properties were identified and evaluated;
• 2 individual properties appeared to be eligible for National Register listing and localdesignation and as a district contributor at the local level;
• 1 individual property appeared to be eligible for California Register listing;
• 30 individual properties and 5 historic districts appeared to be eligible for localdesignation. Of the 30 individual properties, 27 also appeared to be contributors to alocally significant historic district;
• 239 individual properties appeared to be contributors to historic districts eligible forlocal designation;
• 239 individual properties appeared to be ineligible for local listing but may warrantspecial consideration in local planning;
• 109 individual properties appeared to be ineligible for any level of designation;
• 5 potential historic districts containing 268 contributing properties appeared to beeligible for local designation.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
2
I. INTRODUCTION
A. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The Historic Resources Survey Update and the Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey ofthe City of Beverly Hills was prepared by PCR Services Corporation for the City of BeverlyHills’ Planning and Community Development Department. The Historic Resources SurveyUpdate formally re-identifies and re-evaluates 386 previously identified historic resourcesincluding individual properties, community design features, and historic districts for federal,state, andlor local significance. The Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey involves thereconnaissance-level survey of all individual multi-family residences located within Area 4 ofthe City (south of Wilshire Boulevard within the City’s east, west, and south municipalboundaries) constructed prior to 1961. The total number of individual properties meeting thesecriteria was 622. As part of the Area 4 survey process, an important element was the preliminaryidentification of potential historic districts and their associated contributors. These currentsurvey efforts are intended to serve as a foundation for future historic resources surveys, and as abasis for land use and historic preservation decisions by City officials.
B. PROJECT BACKGROUND
In the mid-1980s, historic resources consultants Johnson Heumann Research Associatesconducted a preliminary city-wide survey of all historic resources constructed in the City prior to1945. The resulting document was titled the “Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey, 1985-1986.” During the survey process, the City was divided into 6 survey areas (see Map onfollowing page). These were Area 1, known as the “industrial area;” Area 2, the single-familyresidential area south of Santa Monica Boulevard, exclusive of Trousdale Estates; Area 3, asingle- and multi-family residential area south of Santa Monica Boulevard and north of WilshireBoulevard; Area 4, the residential areas bordered by Wilshire Boulevard on the north and theCity limits on the east, west, and south; Area 5, the City’s historic commercial core and WilshireBoulevard; and Area 6, a single-family residential area known as Trousdale Estates. Field formswere subsequently completed for 2,790 structures identified in the city-wide survey. Of thesurveyed properties, State Historic Resources Inventory survey forms (DPR 523 series) werecompleted for architecturally and/or historically significant structures (372 total), districts andthematic groupings (10 total), and community design features (4 total). Under the (sincesuperceded) pre-August 2003 Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) rating system, these wereproperties rated 5D and above.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
Historic Survey AreasCity of Beverly Hills
‘1
p -~
c
I. Introduction
C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In April, 2004, the City of Beverly Hills Planning and Community DevelopmentDepartment awarded PCR Services the contract to conduct a Historic Resources Survey Updateof previously identified historic properties within the City. This became Part I of the currentscope of work. During the Part I survey process, an additional scope of work defined as Part IIof the current survey was discussed and agreed upon. Part II involves the reconnaissance-levelsurvey of all individual multi-family residences located within Area 4 of the City constructedprior to 1961.
Part I of the project consists of perfonning a reconnaissance-level survey update of 386previously identified resources including individual properties, districts, and community designfeatures deemed architecturally and/or historically significant. Each of these resources was reidentified and reassessed for federal, state, and/or local significance. The identified resourceswere digitally photographed, reassessed, and recorded on State Inventory Continuation forms(DPR 523L), which are utilized for documenting historic resource survey updates.
Part II of the project consists of a reconnaissance-level survey of 622 multi-familyresidences located in Area 4 of the City of Beverly Hills constructed prior to 1961. Area 4 is thelarge, primarily residential section of the City located south of Wilshire Boulevar4 and boundedon the east, west, and south by the City’s municipal borders. Additionally, under this scope ofwork, potential Area 4 historic districts and their associated contributors were to be identifiedand documented. Five potential historic districts were identified in Area 4. A Primaiy Record(DPR 523A), consisting of a photograph, description, and preliminary rating code was preparedfor each of the 622 applicable multi-family residences identified in the survey process, takinginto consideration their qualifications as potential district contributors.
All work under this current scope was prepared according to the OHP’s Instructions forRecording Historical Resources. The consultant worked closely with the City’s Planning andCommunity Development Department staff in both updating the existing survey and creating acomprehensive, detailed, and usable survey document of multi-family properties located in Area4 to plan and build additional surveys.
D. PROJECT LOCATION
Beverly Hills
The City of Beverly Hills was incorporated in 1914 and currently encompassesapproximately 6 square miles with a population of approximately 10,000. Beverly Hills isknown for its tree-lined streets, beautiful public parks, upscale shopping district, world-renownedhotels, stately residences and estates, and as the “home to the stars.”
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
3
II. PROJECT METHODOLOGY
A. PREVIOUS SURVEY METHODOLOGY
The methodology that the previous consultant used in the 1985-86 survey to compile thelist of historic resources was through: 1) initial windshield surveys; 2) site visits including sitephotography; 3) site specific research; and 4) evaluations of the sites. Additionally, propertiesexhibiting architectural and/or historical significance (and documented using DPR 523 forms)were assigned a status code based upon the State Office of Historic Preservation’s (OHP)“National Register Status Categories,” that existed at that time. In August 2003, the OHPupdated their status code system. Under the previous status code system, status codes rangedfrom 1 to 5, with 1 being a property listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP),and 5 indicating that the property is ineligible for the National Register, but of local interest.
B. PRE-FIELD RESEARCH
In order to update and document those properties previously identified as architecturallyand/or historically significant, and prior to conducting the initial survey of Area 4 multi-familyresidences, a multi-step methodology was utilized. The consultant reviewed the NationalRegister of Historic Places, the California Historic Resources Inventory maintained by the OHP,and the Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey, 1985-1986 to determine existing evaluationsand designations.
The consultant also collected and reviewed relevant historic images, documents, andarchives including those provided by the City of Beverly Hills Planning and CommunityDevelopment Department prior to conducting sites visits and further research. Additionally, theconsultant reviewed ordinances, statutes, regulations, bulletins, and technical materials relatingto federal, state, and local historic preservation designation assessment processes and relatedprograms. The City provided a database (Microsoft Excel spreadsheet) of citywide propertiesthat included relevant information such as address, assessor’s parcel number (APN), year ofconstruction, building type, owner, and other data. PCR merged the City database with PCR’sdatabase (Microsoft Access), which was purged for redundancies. The PCR database wasupdated with additional information including O1{P and City status codes and correspondingCity area (Areas 1-5).
C. FIELDWORK
The consultants conducted several reconnaissance-level (or windshield) field surveys inthe Part I survey update process involving previously identified properties. This windshieldsurvey process involved driving or walking the survey areas and, from the public right-of-way,noting the current physical condition of the previously identified buildings, structures, andcommunity design features. Additionally, the windshield survey process involved noting thegeneral distribution and character of the buildings within the previously identified districts and
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
4
II. Project Methodology
thematic groupings. Discrepancies in street addresses were resolved by additional site visits tothe properties in question or review of tax assessor information. In addition, building materialsand architectural details not visible or unclear in the photographs were checked by returning tothe field for on-site verification. The fieldwork also included photographing all of the 386previously identified resources in digital format.
A similar windshield survey process was followed for Part II of the current surveyinvolving 622 multi-family properties located within the City’s Area 4. Noted features includedbuilding type, style, plan, distinguishing architectural features, landscaping, and overall level ofphysical integrity. Preliminary status codes were noted, keeping in mind the property’s potentialas a possible contributor to a historic district.
D. PHOTOGRAPHY
Digital photographs of 386 Part I survey update properties and 622 Part II Area 4 surveyproperties were taken by the consultant. All photographs were shot from the public right-of-wayand logged. The photographs were entered into the PCR database and included on the DPR523L Continuation forms and DPR 523A Primary Record forms completed for each resourcedocumented.
E. RESEARCH AN]) EVALUATION
Site specific research related to selected resources within the Part I survey update processwas conducted and documented. National Register Status Codes for each surveyed property inthe Part I process were reviewed and, if necessary, new evaluations were made. Applicablenational, state, and local criteria were applied. For the Part II survey process, preliminaryNational Register Status Codes were assigned to each Area 4 surveyed property, with particularattention paid to evaluating the property’s potential as a possible contributor to a historic district.
F. DATABASE
As noted previously, a database designed in Microsoft Access by PCR Services wasmerged with the City’s database and utilized to record information collected on those propertiesdocumented under this current scope of work. In addition, the Access database produced thenecessary DPR 523 forms and organized the survey data in a variety of formats for ease of use.The initial data on those properties documented was obtained from the City in a Microsoft Excelformat and was imported into the consultant’s database. Data fields listed in the databaseincludes information such as property address, APN, resource type, architectural style, functionor use, NRHP evaluation code, construction dates, architect, and contractor. The consultantverified the initial data, made necessary corrections, and added relevant information to itthroughout the survey process.
G. PREPARATION OF FINAL PRODUCTS
At the conclusion of the survey process, the consultant prepared a final report. Thisreport summarizes the areas that were surveyed and documented, the research design or
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
5
II. Project Methodology
statement of the objectives of the survey, the methodology used, the results of the survey, andrelevant State inventory forms (DPR 523A, 523L forms). Further, numerous tables wereprovided that summarize and highlight the results of the Part I and Part II surveys, identifyproperties with rating code modifications, and update historic district status codes and theirassociated descriptions.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
6
III. HISTORIC CONTEXT1
Beverly Hills Development History
From the time of its settlement by Mexican pioneers in 1822, until the World War I era,the Beverly Hills area was a primarily agricultural region. Cattle ranches predominated duringthe Mexican era, giving way to sheep ranches in the 1 860s, and then lima bean fields beginningin the 1 880s. During this early period, several attempts were made to establish a town in what isnow Beverly Hills, including the proposed developments of Santa Maria in 1869 and Morocco in1888. Efforts to create the present community of Beverly Hills finally succeeded in 1907. Eventhen, the pace of development was leisurely, picking up only after the construction of theBeverly Hills Hotel in 1911, with the real boom in development not occurring until the decade ofthe 1920s.
Settled initially by magnates and businesspeople such as oilmen Kirk B. Johnson andMax Whittier, Beverly Hills found itself synonymous with “hometown to the stars” after DouglasFairbanks and Mary Pickford took up residence at Pickfair in 1920. Many other entertainmentindustry figures followed during the succeeding decades. In the 1930s and 40s, Beverly Hills’retail district began to compete with the Miracle Mile district, Hollywood, and newly developedWestwood Village for the title of the most fashionable shopping district in metropolitan LosAngeles. In the post World War II era, the City’s downtown became an important center forprofessional and business offices as well. The vitality ofBeverly Hills continues unabated today.
1769 - 1854: Valdez Era!First American Ownership
The first Europeans to come to Beverly Hills were the Spanish explorers of the Gaspar dePortola party who passed through the area in 1769. Travelling west, they reached thesoutheastern corner of present-day Beverly Hills, noting “a large vineyard of grapes, and aninfinity of rose bushes in bloom.” The expedition is commemorated by a State of Californiaplaque in La Cienega Park. Father Crespi, who chronicled the journey, wrote that when theexplorers arrived at the little Indian village at the edge of Beverly Hills, the inhabitantsapproached them, “greeted us . . .“ and offered food (Father Crespi translated and quoted, p. 11,Benedict’s History of Beverly Hills).
It was not until over fifty years later, around 1822, that the Beverly Hills area wasclaimed. Mexican settlers Maria Rita Valdez and her husband Vicente Valdez were granted theRancho Rodeo de las Aguas (The Ranch of the Gathering of the Waters) by the Mexican
Excerpted from the Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey, 1985-1986 Report, prepared by Johnson HeumannResearch Associates.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
7
II. Project Methodology
government. Its boundaries include roughly all of present-day Beverly Hills, as well as territorynow in the cities of Los Angeles and West Hollywood to the east and south. Part of theadditional territory extended as far east as the La Brea Tar Pits (see illustration). The nameRancho Rodeo de las Aguas was derived from the swamps or “cienegas” created by rain run-offflowing out of Coidwater and Benedict Canyons. Vicente, a retired soldier, died in 1828, leavingMaria in charge of the 4,500 acre ranch. Despite its size, the ranch was a relatively modestundertaking, consisting of the minimum size cattle herd that would keep her ownership of theproperty valid, two small houses, and a small garden reclaimed from the swamp and springs onthe property. The main adobe residence stood near the present northwest corner of SunsetBoulevard and Alpine Drive.
Maria was plagued by the rival claims of a relative, Luciano Valdez, against whom sheultimately won a judgement in 1844. According to standard accounts, in 1852 Maria’s house wasthe site of an Indian attack. Afterwards, Maria moved to the safety of the pueblo of Los Angeles.In 1854, the ranch was sold for $4,000 to two Americans, Benjamin Davis “Don Benito” Wilsonand Major Henry Hancock. Don Benito was a major figure in the development of SouthernCalifornia, whose land holdings extended from the San Gabriel Valley to West Los Angeles, andwho was instrumental in the founding of the California citrus and viticulture industries.Hancock, a Civil War veteran, surveyed many areas of the Los Angeles basin, and subsequentlyacquired large tracts around the La Brea Tar Pits. Hancock’s family owned Rancho La Brea, tothe east ofRancho Rodeo de las Aguas.
When the Americans bought the property, it had four adobe structures on it. PierceBenedict, son of Beverly Hills pioneer Edson A. Benedict and editor-in-chief of the 1934History of Beverly Hills, describes the Valdez adobe as having narrow slit-like windows.Spanish and Mexican era adobes were primitive structures by our standards. Many of them hadbrea or tar roofs that dripped pitch in hot weather, interior fireplaces that blackened the wallswith soot, tamped earth floors, and narrow window and door openings often enclosed withleather flaps. They were usually one story, or occasionally one and one-half stories with anupper loft. Their landscaping was minimal, and many of the features we now think of as beingcommonly associated with Colonial era architecture in California were introduced during the1840s and 1850s by American settlers, such as second stories and milled woodwork. One adobe,the Antonio Rocha house located near Robertson and Third on what would later become theHammel and Denker ranch in the southern part of Beverly Hills, did survive well into thetwentieth century.
1854- 1906: Rancho Continues/Beginning of Subdivisions and Townsites
Hancock’s interest in the ranch was sold to William Workman in 1862. Workman’sfamily was in the saddlery business, and he and his brother had amassed a great fortune sellingequipment to the builders of the railroads. They converted much of their profits into real estate.Plans to farm the ranch failed because of drought. One hundred twenty-five acres of the ranch in
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
8
II. Project Methodology
the present-day Pico/Robertson area were sold to James Whitworth in 1866. It included most,but not all, of the area bounded by Robertson, La Cienega, and Wilshire Boulevards. Onehundred sixty acres at the southern corner of Rancho Rodeo de las Aguas were sold to Basquesheep herders, Domingo Amestoy and Berhnart Domaleche, two years later. That same year, in1868, wool dealer Edward 0. Preuss acquired the remaining 3,608 acres of the original rancho’s4,539 acres. Also in 1868, Los Angeles grocer Edson A. Benedict filed claim to property in themouth of what is now Benedict Canyon. His son Pierce later settled on property adjoining hisfather. The Benedicts raised walnut trees, beans, and other vegetables, and kept bees.
Preuss, now owner of a majority of the original rancho, in turn sold parcels of land toother early settlers, including George P. Ruhland, Frederick L. Buhn, and F.X. Eberle. In 1869,Preuss sold Francis F.P. Temple a half interest in the ranch. In an attempt to start a Germancolony like that in Anaheim, the partners created a company to subdivide the ranch. Headed byJohn P. Schmitz, the De Las Aguas Land Association subdivided the ranch into 75-acre farms,reserving a site at the center for the proposed community of Santa Maria. The town center wasbounded approximately by Doheny Drive on the east, Burton Way on the north, Gregory on thesouth, and El Camino on the west.
The subdivision was a failure, and much of the rancho passed into the hands of two LosAngeles hoteliers who proceeded to grow lima beans on the property. Their first land purchasewas made in 1881, and was later added to parcel by parcel. Henry Hammel and Charles Denker,managers of the U.S. Hotel in Los Angeles, proposed their own townsite, to be called Morocco,for the area. Morocco was subdivided in 1888 during the big land boom of 1887-88, the erawhich saw the start of so many Southern California communities, both successful andunsuccessful. Hammel and Denker’s settlement was centered around the train station at the thenjunction of Burton Way and Santa Monica Boulevard (in the vicinity of Canon and BeverlyDrives today) on the Santa Monica-Los Angeles line, which ran along Santa Monica Boulevard,which had also been named Morocco.
1906 - 1920: Rodeo Land and Water DevelopmentlEarly Residences
Plans for Morocco were never realized, and the next activities on the ranch centeredaround a syndicate of investors, known as the Amalgamated Oil Company, who initially hopedto find oil on the property. The Company was composed of such well-known entrepreneurs asW.G. Kerckhoff, W.S. Porter, Max Whittier, and Burton E. Green. Attempts to exploit thedeeply buried oil reserves came to naught, and once again the owners of the ranch focused theirhopes on subdividing the Beverly Hills area as a real estate development. These same investorsin Amalgamated Oil reorganized as the Rodeo Land and Water Company in 1906, this time withrailroad tycoon Henry E. Huntington as one of the investors. Burton Green played a leading rolein formulating the plans for a garden city. At this time, the ranch boundaries were WhittierDrive on the west, Doheny Drive on the east, Wilshire Boulevard on the south, and the foothillsabove Sunset Boulevard on the north.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
9
II. Project Methodology
The syndicate hired Wilbur F. Cook, Jr. to plan the community. Cook had worked withFrederick Law Olmsted, famed designer of New York’s Central Park and several gardencommunities, on the Columbian Exposition of 1893 and the improvements to the White Housegrounds of 1902. In 1905, he left Olmsted’s firm and moved to Oakland, where he planned parksfor that city. Some of Cook’s other Southern California projects include Exposition Park, thePalos Verdes Estates, Los Angeles Civic Center, and portions of Griffith Park.
The city that Cook planned was to be a relatively balanced community, albeit an affluentone. It was one of the earliest planned communities in Southern California, antedating such latercities as Torrance and Rancho Santa Fe. The City was designed so that it shaded from smallerlots at its southern edge to large estates for the wealthy in the foothills at the north. The elitenorthern portion was divided from the southern portion by the railroad tracks and a commercialtriangle between Santa Monica and Wilshire Boulevards. This triangle was originally known as“Beverly” while the rest of the City, located north of Santa Monica Boulevard, was known as“Beverly Hills.” Land along the railway line was set aside for industry east of Canon Drive.
Between Santa Monica and Sunset Boulevards were four blocks of gently curving streetsfor upper middle class families, while the tenitory north of Sunset was set aside for estates.After Cook’s plan was completed, Crescent, Canon, Beverly, and Rodeo Drives were openedbetween Wilshire and Sunset. A fifth street, Palm Drive, was afready in existence, having beenpart of the Hammel and Denker ranch. Horticulturist John J. Reeves was retained to develop themaster tree planting. He was the one responsible for Beverly Hills’ famous street tree plantingconcept, dictating that different species of trees be planted for the full length of each street.Reeves supervised the work from a cabin nestled in eucalpytus trees near Sunset Boulevard andAlpine Drive across the street from the old Beverly Hills Nursery, which once occupied the southside of Sunset from Palm to Alpine. The nursery was to play a continually important role in theCity’s development, landscaping most of the major residences constructed in the 1920s.
Maps were filed with the County Recorder in 1906 and 1907, and the developers began tobuild model homes, one of which is still extant at 515 North Canon Drive. Lots were offered forsale at prices ranging from several hundred to $1,000 apiece. Difficult as it is to conceive now,Beverly Hills real estate was not the coveted item in 1907 that it is today. Relatively far from thecenter of downtown Los Angeles, the Rodeo Land and Water Company’s developmentlanguished during the depression of 1907-08 and had to be pulled off the market. Even when theeconomy recovered in 1910, the market for Beverly Hills real estate still proved sluggish.
As in so many of the boom towns of the 1 880s, Beverly Hills needed a large resort hotelto give it prominence and establish its reputation. It got that hotel in 1911, when the Rodeo Landand Water Company, in conjunction with Margaret J. Anderson, commissioned Elmer Grey tobuild his CraftsmanlMission Revival design. Officially opened in 1912 as the Beverly HillsHotel, Anderson, who had been the manager of the Hollywood Hotel for several years beforemaking the decision to relocate in Beverly Hills “against the advice of friends and associates,”
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
10
II. Project Methodology
operated the new venture. A one-trolley car system known as the “Dinky” conveyed guests froma Pacific Electric station at the southwest corner of Santa Monica Boulevard and Canon Drive upRodeo Drive to the Hotel.
Tn 1914, worry over the possibility of a water shortage and the desire to improve the localschool system prompted a campaign to incorporate the area. Since the annexation petitionrequired 500 signatures, it appears that Beverly Hills had to round out the total by importingworkers from the neighboring railway town of Sherman (now West Hollywood). The originalform of government was a Board of Trustees and the Board’s first President was William T.Gould. The original boundaries of the City were much the same as they are today, except for thearea south of Wilshire Boulevard, annexed the following year (1915), and the Trousdale Estates,annexed in 1955. Most of the City was still open land, with development scattered aroundCanon Drive, Beverly Drive, Crescent Drive, and the downtown triangle and Beverly Hills areas.
The architecture of Beverly Hills in the years following the City’s founding until its majorperiod of residential growth in the 1 920s was dominated by the Craftsman and Mission Revivalstyles as well as by the relatively staid and correct period revival styles--Tudor, Georgian, andBeaux Arts Classicism--that were popular elsewhere in America. The business block built in1907 at the southwest corner of Little Santa Monica Boulevard and Beverly Drive that housedthe Beverly Hills Realty Company was a gabled Tudor Revival building. Also Tudor, in largepart, was Burton Green’s house on northwest corner of Lexington Road and Oxford Way,(extant, but much remodelled) with a central crenellated Richardsonian Romanesque bay,completed in 1914, and the Kirk B. Johnson house (built in 1912) at the top of Alpine Drive,where the half-timbering had been handled in a Craftsman-like manner. The Roland P. Bishophouse (also occupied by financier I.W. Hellman), now demolished, was located in the Oxford,Hartford, Lexington triangle, and was a block-like, Neoclassical structure in the Beaux Artstradition with Georgian! Federal Revival influences. The Max Whittier house of 1916, formerlyat the northwest corner of Alpine Drive and Sunset Boulevard and now demolished, wasoriginally one of the earliest versions of an Italian Renaissance villa in Beverly Hills.
One of the most architecturally significant residences from this era still standing inBeverly Hills is an import moved in 1923 from its original location at Wilshire and Berendo inLos Angeles, to its present location at 910 N. Bedford Drive. Although it has been moved, itnonetheless stands as one of the best preserved and best examples of the work of its architects,Pasadena’s Charles and Henry Greene. The Greene Brothers achieved national fame during thefirst fifteen years of this century as the quintessential designers of the Craftsman bungalow.Henry Greene was also responsible for the development of its garden and garden walls on theBedford Drive site, undertaken in 1925.
1920 - 1945: Beverly Hills “Home to the Stars”/Identity as a City
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
11
II. Project Methodology
Beverly Hills in 1920 was a city in transition. The majority of its residential andcommercial lots were still vacant, but enough development had occurred to make it clear that atown was being fonned. At the same time, there were still many vestiges of its rural past.Clusters of ranch buildings remained at Robertson Boulevard near Wilshire, near Canon Driveand Walden, and along Palm Drive just north of Santa Monica Boulevard. The Los AngelesAuto Speedway occupied the area south of Wilshire and West of Beverly Drive,and a longgroveof eucalyptus ran along the approximate route of Charleville. All of the area south ofWilshire, west of Roxbury, and east of Foothill was vacant. However, by the end of the decadethe City was largely developed, and had assumed the basic form in which we know it today. Itwas not until the 1920s that Beverly Hills became a haven for movie stars who joined magnatessuch as Max Whittier and Burton Green. A perusal of City directories and building permits forthis era will readily disclose that the concept of Beverly Hills as the successor to Hollywood asthe hometown for people in the entertainment industry was not misplaced. It began in 1920when national attention was focused on the City as Douglas Fairbanks and his bride MaryPickford moved into their house “Pickfair” at 1143 Summit Drive, setting the precedent for otherentertainment industry figures to follow. It became the “social center of the movie colony andgoal of tourists” as W.W. Robinson noted in his 1939 history of Beverly Hills. Within a fewyears, major entertainment industry figures, such as Gloria Swanson, Will Rogers, and CharlesChaplin, were Beverly Hills residents.
With the addition of the movie colony, the character of Beverly Hills architecture as weknow it today began to take shape and define itself. Much of the City’s architecture from theperiod between the two world wars is indistinguishable from other similarly affluentneighborhoods in other California communities. However, there was a definite element of self-expression and theatricality exhibited in its private houses. Located just outside the BeverlyHills city limits, Thomas Ince’s house, Dias Dorados, designed by Roy Seldon Price in 1922(since demolished), included among its many attractions a shooting gallery, billiard room,scaled-down roller skating rink, and a desert room where the floors were covered with sand andpunctuated by cactus plants. Its mammoth circular party room was decorated as a Mexicancantina.
A portion of the Dias Dorados property, located on the west side of Benedict Canonabove Sunset Boulevard, was sold to movie comedian Harold Lloyd, to become Greenacres(constructed 1926-29), with A.E. Hansen as landscape architect, and Webber, Staunton, andSpaulding, as the building architects. The main house, designed in the Italian Renaissance style,had forty-four rooms. The entry was sixteen feet high, and was dominated by an elaborate handcarved staircase. The ceiling of the living room was coffered and painted with gold leaf. Thewalls of the solarium were hand painted and took over a year to complete. But the fantasy wasnot confined to the residence itself. Lloyd’s children played in scaled down replicas of a thatchedEnglish cottage and a French barn located on the grounds. A pool, tennis court, nine-hole golfcourse, and handball court were among the amenities provided for the adults’ entertainment.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
12
II. Project Methodology
Houses such as Pickfair, Dias Dorados, and Greenacres established a standard which wasquickly followed, in varying degrees of extravagance, by silent film stars Charles Chaplin, TomMix, Buster Keaton, Gloria Swanson, and Pola Negri. Flamboyant art directors and producersshowed how delightfully the art of set decoration could be applied to real life. Best known of allis the Spadena house--a fairy tale, steep-roofed version of an English thatched cottage. It wasdesigned by Henry Oliver in 1921 as a movie set and office for Irvin V. Willat Productions inCulver City, and later moved to its present location at the southeast corner of Carmelita Avenueand Walden Drive.
Other buildings in this long list of distinguished movie colony commissions includeRobert Farquhar’s 1927 house occupied by mogul Harry Cohn located on Crescent nearLexington Drive, Gordon Kaufmann’s 1925 house for producer Milton Goetz on North BeverlyDrive, and Wallace Neffs half-circular Mediterranean villa on Angelo Drive for director FredNiblo just outside the city limits. Not to be outdone, wealthy businessmen continued to buildtheir own palaces. Most notable of these is Greystone (501 Doheny Rd.), built for E.L. Doheny,Jr., whose family then owned an extensive ranch including the property where Trousdale Estatesis now located. Gordon Kaufmann was the architect and Paul Thiene was the landscape designerfor this monumental Tudor! Jacobean residence. The 46,000 square foot structure was built ofIndiana limestone and roofed with slate. Its expansive floor plan includes a two story entrancehail, a number of public rooms (library, formal dining room, great hall), several bedroom suites,and a service wing. Listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the building and groundsare now owned by the City ofBeverly Hills. Doheny’s widow occupied the residence until 1955,when she and her second husband, Leigh Battson, moved further up the canyon on SchuylerRoad to the Knoll, situated on property which had been acquired by E.L. Doheny Sr. in the1920s. This residence, while of more recent construction, continues the tradition of the greatBeverly Hills estates.
Sophisticated period revival styles dominated both domestic and commercial architecturein the 1920s. Most popular were the variations on Hispanic and Mediterranean themes, such asRalph C. Flewelling’s 1929 Hawthorne School on North Rexford Drive at Elevado Avenue toWalker and Eisen’s Beverly Wilshire Hotel (9500 Wilshire Boulevard) of 1926. The 1920s wasa highly eclectic and exuberant period in the architecture of Southern California, however, andtheir styles were popular as well. L.A. Smith’s Beverly Theatre of 1925 at 206 North BeverlyDrive is Moorish in inspiration while the 1930 Warner Theatre (now the Beverly; 9404 WilshireBoulevard) by B. Marcus Priteca and the 1929 Fox Wilshire Theatre (8440 Wilshire Boulevard)by S. Charles Lee are Art Deco. The Beverly Hills City Hall of 1931 by Koerner and Gage isSpanish Churrigueresque and a water treatment plant of 1927 by Salisbury, Bradshaw andTaylor, located in La Cienega Park, is Spanish Romanesque in appearance. The 1929 municipalswimming pool in the same park (demolished in 1978) by Holmes and Sanborn, in which the1932 Olympic swimmers trained, was in a Spanish style and was noted for its tile work. TheFrances V. Botiller house on Sunset Boulevard near Hillcrest Drive by Msr. Lourdon of Parisemployed eighteenth century French forms that were early harbingers of the Beverly Hills love
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
13
II. Project Methodology
of French imagery that became evident after World War II with the popularity of the mansardroof. Sedate and dignified Tudor homes and romanticized antebellum mansions peppered thecommunity.
By the end of the decade, downtown Beverly Hills had several movie houses, two majorhotels, and a “trade at home week” which “set out to prove that the finest shops and stores on theWest Coast were in the city.” Downtown development flourished, responding to a populationwhich had risen from less than 700 people in 1920 to 12,000 in 1926.
It was during the 1920s and 1930s that the architectural character of Beverly Hills as weknow it today was established. Commercial development in the downtown core, and apartmentsin the area south of Wilshire and Santa Monica Boulevards completed the transformation of theCity from a semi-rural outpost into a synonym for urbanity. The duplex, fourplex, and centralhall apartment became almost as important housing t~es in the southern section of the City assingle family homes. The same stylistic range was found in the apartments as was found in thehouses, virtually all of them Period Revival or Moderne rather than modern. While the SpanishColonial Revival predominated during the 1920s, other Period Revival favorites, particularlyNormandy and English cottages were also popular during that decade. Both phases of theModerne, the Zigzag mode of the 20s and the Streamlined Moderne of the 1930s, were oftenused on commercial building for their stylish up-to-date connotations. Examples are the PremierMarket at 425 North Canon Drive, and the Zigzag storefront now occupied by Cyril’s at 370Beverly Drive. Other notable streamlined designs include Milton Black’s 1937 Payne FurnaceCompany at 336 Foothill Road, and Stiles 0. Clements’ Beverly Hills High School SwimmingPool of the same year. Anderton Court (328 North Rodeo Drive), attributed to Frank LloydWright, reveals that architect in an Art Deco-influenced mode.
During the 1930s, Beverly Hills became one of the areas of Southern California mostclosely connected with the development of the Hollywood Regency style. Born of the meetingof Moderne sleekness with the elegance of early nineteenth century architectural forms, it usedsimple, primary forms and blank wall surfaces to project exclusivity and sophistication. Many ofthe most elaborate Hollywood Regency buildings by architects such as James Dolena, Honnoldand Russell, and Paul Williams were located in the commercial core of Beverly Hills or the largeestates to the north of Sunset Boulevard. Among these buildings was the 1926 Spanish ColonialRevival home of actor Hobart Bosworth, on Hillcrest Road which was altered into a HollywoodRegency design by James Dolena for actor William Powell in 1935. John and DonaldParkinson’s Saks Fifth Avenue (9600 Wilshire Boulevard) with Paul R. Williams, circa 1937,and Timothy Pflueger’s I. Magnin and Co. (9634 Wilshire Boulevard) of 1939 showed how wellsuited this combination of Modem and Period Revival forms was for commercial use. EvenPickfair itself got the Georgianizing treatment so popular in the late 1 920s, under the supervisionof architect Wallace Neff and interior decorator Elsie De Wolfe. De Wolfe, often known as themother of American interior decoration, lived in Beverly Hills during the World War II years,
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
14
II. Project Methodology
and was an important advocate for Period Revivalism during the 1 930s and 1 940s in SouthernCalifornia.
Beverly Hills may also be responsible for launching the mansard roof to popularity inSouthern California. During the 1 940s, John Woolf used mansards on two houses, the Chishoim(520 N. Beverly Drive) and Pendleton (1032 N. Beverly Drive) houses, that were well-known todecorators, and helped create the vogue for mansards.
1945-1986: Post World War II: Development/Commercial Growth/NotableArchitects
While Beverly Hills was fully developed by the end of World War II, it continued togrow in intensity of land use and population by the subdivision of large estates such as TrousdaleEstates out of the old Doheny ranch in 1955, and the demolition of existing structures for newapartments, stores, and offices. The construction of J.W. Robinson’s department store in 1952(9900 Wilshire Boulevard) and Welton Becket’s International style Beverly Hilton (9876Wilshire Boulevard) in 1956 were signs of the City’s continued commercial vitality. During the1950s, Beverly Hills gained an additional identity as a workplace. It became a daytime home tooffice workers, as well as a nighttime home to moviestars. The 1920s was the last decade inwhich downtown Los Angeles was preeminent as an office, financial, and professional center.From this point on, they dispersed to several outlying nodes of activity, such as Beverly Hills,Westwood, and the San Fernando Valley.
While the vast majority of residential construction and remodeling continued to be PeriodRevival in character, as it remains to this day, some notable modem houses were built in BeverlyHills during the 1940s and 50s, including Harwell Hamilton Harris’s house for Harold English of1950 at 1261 Lago Vista.
What was most notable about Beverly Hills domestic architecture in the post-World WarII era was the survival of full-blown Period Revival references in a much more committedfashion than might be found elsewhere in Southern California. Architects such as Wallace Neff,James Dolena, and John Woolf continued to produce work that had much in common with theirpre-war buildings stylistically. Much of their work could be seen as an outgrowth of the interestin the simple Neoclassical forms and the blank surfaces of the 1930s Hollywood Regency.
Modernism did dominate multiple unit housing and commercial and office building fromabout 1950 on, however. The stucco box apartment house vernacular of flat surfaces, aluminumwindows and flat roofs decorated by abstract trim was as prominent in new construction inBeverly Hills as it was elsewhere in Southern California. By the 1960s, apartment buildings hadgrown larger, occupying parcels assembled from several lots, and constructed over undergroundparking.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
15
II. Project Methodology
During the 1 960s and 70s, Beverly Hills downtown urbanization continued until thewesternmost section of the downtown triangle was as densely developed as any SouthernCalifornia office cluster outside of downtown Los Angeles. The most prominent buildings fromthis era are the New Fonnalist building at Wilshire and McCarty for Perpetual Savings Bank byEdward D. Stone of 1962, Craig Ellwood’s Mies van der Rohe-like Security Pacific Plaza of1969 at Wilshire and Bedford, and the Great Western Savings Center of 1972 by William Pereira(southeast corner of La Cienega and Wilshire Boulevards).
New construction in Beverly Hills is scattered throughout the City, on undevelopedproperties in the hills and on redeveloped parcels in the residential and commercial sections ofthe “flats.” One of the most notable recent additions to the Beverly Hills built environmentadopts an innovative solution to the problem of site by building a penthouse atop an existingstructure. Frank Gehry’s Wosk Penthouse of 1983 on Roxbury, across from Roxbury Park,represents a striking meeting of an architect with highly personal and abstract art concerns with aclient of strong artistic and expressive needs of her own.
Another notable achievement of contemporary architecture in Beverly Hills is the newaddition to the civic center now under construction, designed by Charles Moore and the UrbanInnovations Group. The Moore/LUG design was selected as a result of a design competition heldby the City of Beverly Hills that was widely acclaimed for its careful and imaginative planningand organization. The new building exhibits sensitivity to the historical context and reinterpretsthe Mediterranean Revival forms of William Gage’s City Hall built in 1932 and RalphFlewelling’s design for the Post Office, completed in 1933. The use of a period revival form innew ways shows that the use of stylistic references to the past does not limit the designer to merecopying. Such references as well as a review of the City’s historic resources survey inventory,indicate a heightened awareness of the architectural heritage of the City.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
16
IV. ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER
ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
Because of its development history, Beverly Hills is particularly notable for itsrepresentation of period revival style architecture. Although Beverly Hills was planned,subdivided, and parcels made available for sale starting in 1907, the City did not experiencestrong residential growth until the 1920s, a decade when period revival style architecturepredominated. The following is an overview of the most common architectural styles observedin the field survey.
Spanish Colonial Revival
The so-called “revival styles” dominated building in Southern California during most ofthe 1920s and 1930s. Of these the Spanish, felt to be the most responsive to California’s historyand climate, was the most popular. A direct outgrowth from the Mission Revival style, theSpanish Colonial’s identifying features include a low pitched red tile roof with little or no eaveoverhang; parapets; the incorporation of prominent arches placed above either entry doors,principle windows, or beneath porch roofs; and the use of ironwork on windows, doors,balconies and roof supports.
English and Tudor Revival
Although not as popular as the Spanish influenced styles, the medieval traditions ofEnglish architecture, especially those of the countryside, was also explored. Identifying featuresinclude a steeply pitched roof, usually side-gabled; a façade dominated by one or moreprominent cross gables; decorative exposed half-timbering; and groupings of tall narrowwindows.
American Colonial Revival
The Colonial Revival style resulted from the desire of architects and builders to evokeAmerica’s own past. The name Colonial actually encompasses several styles, all looselyassociated with the revival of American and Old World building traditions. Commoncharacteristics of this style include a simple rectangular volume, covered by gabled or hip roofs;symmetrical, balanced dispensing of windows and doors; surfacing of clapboard or brick;classical, colonial detailing such as columns, engaged piers, cornices, and shuttered windows;and double-hung, multi-paned windows.
French Eclectic
Eighteenth century French imagery, particularly as applied to multi-family residentialarchitecture, was well represented in many Southern California communities in the 1 930s and
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
17
III. Architectural Character
1 940s. Identifying features include a tall, steeply pitched hipped roof~ upward flared eaves;stone (or faux stone) or stucco cladding; dormers (often through-the-cornice); quoins; woodshutters; balustraded porches or balconies; massive chimneys; and rounded towers with conicalcaps. Following World War II, the French Eclectic style evolved into the Regency styleconcomitant with the popularity of the French mansard roof.
Regency (Hollywood Regency)
During the 1930s, Beverly Hills became one of the areas of Southern California mostclosely connected with the development of the Hollywood Regency style. Born of the meetingof Moderne sleekness with the elegance of early nineteenth century architectural forms, it usedsimple, primary forms and blank wall surfaces to project exclusivity and sophistication.Common characteristics of this style include symmetry, a primarily unadorned central volumepunctuated by a tall, framed (often double-door) entrance within a neoclassical portico, atraditional entablature, oval notches filled with stylized urns, and sometimes decorative woodshutters. In the 1940s, interior decorator John Woolf helped create the vogue for mansard roofsin Southern California with his pioneering remodels of several Beverly Hills residences thatbecame associated with the Regency style and were widely emulated in the following decades.
Commercial Vernacular
The “Main Street” commercial buildings from the first quarter of the 20th century can becategorized as “commercial vernacular.” Typically of unreinforced brick masonry constructionwith finished red, buff, or brown brick used in the façade, these buildings were one to two storiesand could be freestanding or contiguous with buildings on either side. Storefronts were usuallycomposed of a bulkhead (wood in the earliest examples, tile or bakelite in later years), displaywindows, a glazed entry, and a transom, which banded the entire composition. The buildingswere usually capped with a flat roof surrounded by a parapet.
Other
Though less represented in the City, other notable examples of architectural style includeCraftsman, Renaissance Revival, Art Deco, Streamline Moderne, Late Moderne, InternationalStyle, and vernacular Modern.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
18
V. DEFINITIONS AND CRITERIA
A. NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA
The National Register is an authoritative guide to be used by federal, state, and localgovernments and private groups and citizens to identify the Nation’s cultural resources and toindicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment.Established by the National Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, the Register is administeredby the Secretary of the Interior.
To be eligible for listing in the National Register, a resource must possess significance inAmerican history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and/or culture. Buildings, objects,sites, districts, or structures of potential significance must possess integrity of location, design,feeling, setting, workmanship, materials, and association and must meet one or more of thefollowing established criteria:
• associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patternof our history (Criterion A); or
• are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past (Criterion B); or
• embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction orthat represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or thatrepresent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lackindividual distinction (Criterion C); or
• yield, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history(Criterion D).
A property eligible for listing in the National Register must meet one or more of the fourcriteria (A-D) defined above. It is important to note that properties which meet these criteria canbe significant at a national, state, or local level. As a general rule, properties that are identifiedas potentially eligible for the National Register are also eligible for local landmark or districtdesignation as well. In addition, unless the property possesses exceptional significance, it mustbe at least fifty years old to be eligible for National Register listing.
B. EVALUATION OF INTEGRITY
In addition to meeting the criteria of significance, a property must have integrity.Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance.2 According to National Register
~ United States Department of the Interior, National Register Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National Register
Criteria for Evaluation, (Washington, DC: National Park Service, rev. 1997), P. 44.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
19
IV. Defmitions and Criteria
Bulletin 15, within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognize seven aspectsor qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. To retain historic integrity a propertywill always possess several, and usually most, of these seven aspects. The retention of specificaspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance.3 The seven factorsthat define integrity are location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling andassociation. The following is excerpted from National Register Bulletin 15, which providesguidance on the interpretation and application of these factors.
• Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the placewhere the historic event occurred.4
• Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure,and style of the property. ~
• Setting is the physical environment of a historic property.6
• Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during aparticular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form ahistoric property. ~
• Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture orpeople during any given period in history or prehistory.8
• Feeling is the property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of aparticular period of time.9
~ Ibid.~ Ibid. “The relationship between the property and its location is often important to understanding why the
property was created or why something happened. The actual location of historic property, complemented byits setting is particularly important in recapturing the sense of historic events and persons. Except in rare cases,the relationship between a property and its historic associations is destroyed if the property is moved.”
~ Ibid. “A property’s design reflects historic functions and technologies as well as aesthetics. It includes suchconsiderations as the structural system; massing; arrangement of spaces; pattern of fenestration; textures andcolors of surface materials; type, amount, and style of ornamental detailing; and arrangement and type ofpla~ings in a designed landscape.”
6 National Register Bulletin 15, p. 45.
Ibid. “The choice and combination of materials reveals the preferences of those who created the property andindicated the availability of particular types of materials and technologies. Indigenous materials are often thefocus of regional building traditions and thereby help define an area’s sense of time and place.”
8 Ibid. “Workmanship can apply to the property as a whole or to its individual components. It can be expressed
in vernacular methods of construction and plain finishes or in highly sophisticated configurations andornamental detailing. In can be based on common traditions or innovative period techniques.”
‘~ Ibid. “It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property’s historic
character.”
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
20
IV. Definitions and Criteria
• Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and ahistoric property.’°
In assessing a property’s integrity, the National Register criteria recognize that propertieschange over time; therefore, it is not necessary for a property to retain all its historic physicalfeatures or characteristics. The property must retain, however, the essential physical features thatenable it to convey its historic identity. “
For properties that are considered significant under National Register criteria A and B,National Register Bulletin 15 states that a property that is significant for its historic association iseligible if it retains the essential physical features that made up its character or appearance duringthe period of its association with the important event, historical pattern, or person(s).’2
In assessing the integrity of properties that are considered significant under NationalRegister criterion C, National Register Bulletin 15 provides that a property important forillustrating a particular architectural style or construction technique must retain most of thephysical features that constitute that style or technique.’3
The primary effects of listing in the National Register for jrivate property owners ofhistoric buildings is the availability of financial and tax incentives. ~‘ In addition, for projectsthat receive federal funding, the Section 106 clearance process must be completed. State andlocal laws and regulations may apply to properties listed in the National Register. For example,demolition or inappropriate alteration of National Register eligible or listed properties may besubject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
C. RELOCATION
Relocated properties are generally not eligible for listing in the National Register.’5Special requirements under the National Register criteria must be satisfied for buildings movedduring or after its period of significance. Properties moved before the established “period ofsignificance” do not need to meet these special requirements.’6
According to the federal regulations, there is another exception where “a building orstructure removed from its original location, but which is significant primarily for architectural
~ Ibid. “A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently
intact to convey that relationship to the observer. Like feeling, associations require the presence of physicalfeatures that convey a property’s historic character.. . Because feeling and association depend on individualperceptions, their retention alone is never sufficient to support eligibility of a property for the NationalRegister.”
H National Register Bulletin 15, p. 46.12 Ibid.13 Ibid. “A property that has lost some historic materials or details can be eligible if it retains the majority of the
features that illustrate its style in terms of the massing, spatial relationships, proportion, patter of windows anddoors, texture of materials, and ornamentation. The property is not eligible, however, if it retains some basicfeatures conveying massing but has lost the majority of features that once characterized its style.”
‘~ See 36 CFR 60.2(b)-(c).~ National Register Bulletin 15.16 National Register Bulletin 15.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
21
IV. Definitions and Criteria
value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person orevent... ,,17
For property significance under National Register Criterion C, a moved property mustretain enough historic fabric to convey its architectural values and retain integrity of design,materials, workmanship, feeling, and ~
D. CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA
The California Register of Historical Resources program, enacted in 1992, becameofficial January 1998. It is an authoritative listing and guide to be used by state and localagencies, private groups, and citizens to identify, evaluate, and register California’s historicalresources, and to indicate which resources deserve to be protected, to the extent prudent andfeasible, from substantial adverse change. To be eligible for the California Register of HistoricalResources, a historical resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under oneor more of the following four criteria:
• It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broadpatterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or theUnited States;
• It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or nationalhistory;
• It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method ofconstruction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or
• It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory orhistory of the local area, California, or the nation.
E. CALIFORNIA OFFICE of HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SURVEYMETHODOLOGY
The evaluation instructions and classification system prescribed by the California Officeof Historic Preservation (OHP) in its Instructions for Recording Historical Resources provide athree-digit evaluation rating code for use in classifying potential historic resources. In August2003, the OHP revised the California Historical Resource Status Codes, which are reflectedbelow and utilized in the current survey process. The first digit indicates one of the followinggeneral evaluation categories for use in conducting cultural resources surveys:
1. Listed on the National Register or the California Register;
~ National Register Bulletin 15.18 National Register Bulletin 15.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
22
IV. Definitions and Criteria
2. Determined eligible for listing in the National Register or the California Register;
3. Appears eligible for the National Register or the California Register through surveyevaluation;
4. Appears eligible for the National Register or the California Register through otherevaluation;
5. Recognized as Historically Significant by Local Government;
6. Not eligible for any Listing or Designation; and
7. Not evaluated for the National Register or California Register or needs re-evaluation.
The second digit of the evaluation status code is a letter code indicating whether theresource is separately eligible (S), eligible as part of a district (D), or both (B). The third digit isa number that is used to further specify significance and refine the relationship of the property tothe National Register and/or California Register. Under this evaluation system, categories 1through 4 pertain to various levels of National Register eligibility. The California Register,however, may include surveyed resources with evaluation rating codes through level 5. Inaddition, properties found ineligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, orfor designation under a local ordinance are given an evaluation status code of 6.
F. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
The City of Beverly Hills municipal code, Title 10, Chapter 10, Article 32 authorizes theArchitectural Commission to serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council on thepreservation of historic and cultural landmarks in the City. For the purposes of Article 32, a“historical or cultural landmark” is any site (including significant trees or other plant life locatedthereon), building, or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City, such ashistoric structures or sites in which the broad cultural, political, economic, or social history of thenation, state, or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historicpersonages or with important events in the main currents of national, state, or local history, orwhich embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherentlyvaluable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a masterbuilder, designer, or architect whose individual genius influences his age.
Further, the Conservation Element of the General Plan, Adopted in 1979, included aLandmarks Preservation section which only identified potential landmarks. Subsequently, in1985-1986, the City prepared a city-wide survey of architectural and historical resources. Thesurvey was adopted by the City Council in 1986.
For the purposes of this survey, National Register and California Register criteria wereutilized in updating the assessments of previously identified historic resources and groupings.For the newly identified individual multi-family residences, potential historic districts, anddistrict contributors, significance was analyzed in terms of architectural quality and integrity,
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
23
IV. Defmitions and Criteria
historical or cultural role or association, historical context, andlor social value. Applicablesignificance criteria were then applied.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
24
VI. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SURVEY RESULTS
The Historic Resources Survey Update re-identified and reassessed 386 historic resourcesassociated with Part I of the current survey process. Included in the total are updated evaluationsof the ten historic districts and four community design features identified in the previous survey.Each of these 386 historic resources was photographed and recorded using the States’Continuation Sheet form (DPR 523L) utilized for survey updates. Appendix E contains the DPR523L forms for all 386 resources recorded in the current Historic Resources Survey Update.
The Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey, Part II of the current survey process,resulted in. the identification and recordation of 622 individual properties. Additionally, fivepotential historic districts were identified within Area 4 with a total of 268 contributingproperties located within the five districts. Each of the 622 individual properties and the fivepotential historic districts were photographed and documented using the States’ Primary Recordform (DPR 523A). Appendix F contains the DPR 523A forms for all 622 multi-familyresidences identified in the Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey including the subset of thoseidentified as potential district contributors.
B. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE
Part I of the current survey process involved the historic resources survey update ofapproximately 386 individual properties, historic groupings, and community design featurespreviously identified in the Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey, 1985-1986. Theseresources were re-identified and re-evaluated for federal, state, andlor local significance andwere recorded on State Inventory Continuation forms (DPR 523L).
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
25
V. Findings and Conclusions
Survey Summary:
PCR Description Historic Community IndividualUpdated Districts Design Properties
Status FeaturesCode
iS Individual property listing in NR by the Keeper. 5Listed in the CR.
2S1 Individual property determined eligible for MR 1by the keeper. Listed in the CR.
2S2 Individual property determined eligible for MR 2by a consensus through Section 106 process.Listed in CR.
2S2/5B Individual property determined eligible for NR Iby a consensus through Sec. 106 process. Listedin CR. Locally significant both individually andas a contributor to a district that appears eligiblefor local listing or designation through surveyevaluation
2D2/5S3 Contributor to a district determined eligible for 1NR by consensus through Sec. 106 process.Listed in CR. Appears to be individuallyeligible for local listing or designation throughsurvey evaluation
3B Appears eligible for NR both individually and as 1a contributor to a NR eligible district throughsurvey evaluation
3S Appears eligible for MR as an individual 3 1 22property through survey evaluation
3S/5B Appears eligible for MR as an individual 5property through survey evaluation. Locallysignificant both individually and as a contributorto a district that appears eligible for local listingor designation through survey evaluation
3D Appears eligible for NP. as a contributor to a NR 155eligible district through survey evaluation
3D/S S3 Appears eligible for NR as a contributor to a NR 4eligible district through survey evaluation.Appears to be individually eligible for locallisting or designation through survey evaluation
3CS Appears eligible for CR as an individual 2property through survey evaluation
5S3 Appears to be individually eligible for local 7 2 29listing or designation through survey evaluation
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
26
V. Findings and Conclusions
5D3 Appears to be a contributor to a district that 68appears eligible for local listing or designationthrough survey evaluation
5B Locally significant both individually and as a 4contributor to a district that appears eligible forlocal listing or designation through surveyevaluation
6L Determined ineligible for local listing or 16designation through local government reviewprocess; may warrant special consideration inlocal planning
6Z Found ineligible for NR, CR or local designation 1through survey evaluation
7R Not evaluated 28Demo Demolished 28
TOTAL 10 4 372
Properties Not Visible From Public Rk~ht-of-way:
The 28 properties that could not be properly re-evaluated (rated 7R) because the buildingwas not visible from the public right-of-way during the current survey process are listed below.Permission should be obtained and these properties photographed and re-evaluated in order tofully complete the survey update.
• 918 N. Alpine Dr. (O.B. English Residence)
• 1801 Angelo Dr. (Jack L. Warner Estate)
• 1030 Benedict Canyon Dr. (Corrine Griffith Estate)
• 1220 Benedict Canyon Dr. (Charles B. Hopper Estate)
• 1230 Benedict Canyon Dr. (Howard Hawks Estate)
• 1011 N. Beverly Dr. (Milton Getz Estate)
• 332 S. Camden Dr. (Single-family Residence)
• 135 Copley P1. (Paul H. Helms Residence)
• 916 N. Crescent Dr. (Oscar Lawler Residence)
• 1740 Greenacres Dr. (Harold Lloyd Estate)
• 809 N. Hillcrest Dr. (Single-family Residence)
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
27
V. Findings and Conclusions
• 1200 Laurel Ln. (Single-family Residence)
• 1601 Lexington Rd. (Burton E. Green Residence)
• 1018 Pamela Dr. (Buster Keaton Estate)
• 1026 Ridgedale Dr. (Frederic March Residence)
• 1028 Ridgedale Dr. (R.A. Pratt Residence)
• 315 S. Rodeo Dr. (Single-family Residence)
• 1103 San Ysidro Dr. (Richard B. Fudger Residence)
• 1130 Schuyler Rd. (Single-family Residence)
• 1085 Summit Dr. (Charles Chaplain Estate)
• 9401 Sunset Blvd. (Single-family Residence)
• 9419 Sunset Blvd. (Single-family Residence)
• 9439 Sunset Blvd. (Single-family Residence)
• 9481 Sunset Blvd. (Single-family Residence)
• 9900 Sunset Blvd. (Benjamin Beckman Residence)
• 1162 Tower Rd. (Albert Scott Residence)
• 9930 Tower Lane (J.R. Pinkham Residence)
• 516 Walden Dr. (Willat Production Office. Visible but exterior sheathing wasbeing replaced)
Rating Code Modifications:
Properties given new NRHP status codes differing from previously established City ofBeverly Hills status codes are listed in the table below.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
28
V. Findings and Conclusions
Address Type OHP City PCR CommentStatus Status UpdatedCode Code Status
Code
705 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Harry G. Anderson Res.Demolished
707 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Herbert Robbins Res.Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
710 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo E.P. Dentzel Res. Demolished
715 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
716 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Frank Charon Res. Demolished
721 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo S.C. Roew Res. Demolished
802 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Addie Greenfield Res.Demolished
805 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L W.S. McGilvray Res.Significantly altered from Span.Col. Rev, to Amer. Col. Rev.
808 N. Alpine Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Theodor R. Cadwallader Res.Demolished
634 N. Alta Dr. SFR 3S 3 5S3 Samuel M. Lee Res. Alterationsto entrance area
525 N. Arden Dr. SFR 3D SD Demo Demolished
617 N. Arden Dr. SFR 3D SD Demo Demolished
619 N. Arden Dr. SFR 3B 5 5B L.G. McNeil Res. Significantboth as a district contributor atlocal level and as individuallyeligible for local designation
630 N. Arden Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
City of Beverly HillsPCR Services Corporation
Historic Resources Survey ReportJune 2004
29
V. Findings and Conclusions
705 N. Arden Dr. SFR 3B 5 5B Renee Rivierre Res. Significantboth as a district contributor atlocal level and as individuallyeligible for local designation
707 N. Arden Dr. SFR 3D 5 5B Agnes Morrison Res. Significantboth as a district contributor atlocal level and as individuallyeligible for local designation
501 N. Bedford Dr. Church 4S 5D 3S/5D3 Church of the Good ShepherdCatholic Church. Significantboth as individually eligible forNR listing and as a districtcontributor at local level
305 S. Bedford Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longer‘ district contributor
308 S. Bedford Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
312 S. Bedford Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
339 S. Bedford Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
337 S. Bedford Dr. SFR 3D 5D 3D/5S3 Significant both as a NR eligibledistrict contributor and asindividually eligible for localdesignation
340 S. Bedford Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
610 N. Beverly Dr. SFR 3S 3 Demo Wheeler Oakman Res.Demolished
616 N. Beverly Dr. SFR 3S 3 Demo Herb Nacio Brown Res.Demolished
908 N. Beverly Dr. SFR 5S 5 Demo William Rohkam Res.Demolished
221 S. Beverly Dr. COM 5S 5 6L Beverly Hills Transfer andStorage Co. Substantiallyaltered. No longer individuallyeligible for local designation
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
30
V. Findings and Conclusions
328 S. Camden Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
421 N. Canon Dr. SFR 3S 5 Demo Demolished
515 N. Canon Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Artemus Clark Res.Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
601 N. Canon Dr. SFR 5D 5D Demo Robert M. Kedzie Res.Demolished
145 Copley P1. SFR 4S 3D 3D/5S3 Carrie Guggenheim Res.Significant both as a NR eligibledistrict contributor and asindividually eligible for localdesignation
627 N. Crescent Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
805 N. Crescent Dr. SFR 5D 5D Demo Mary Jackson Res. Demolished
200 S. Elm Dr. School 2S2 5D 3S15B Beverly Vista School. Bldg. Bappears individually NR eligibleand eligible as districtcontributor at local level
832 Greenway Dr. SFR 3S 3D 3B John Rigby Res. Significantboth as a NR eligible districtcontributor and as individuallyeligible for NR
1700 Lexington Rd. SFR 3S 5 3S TA. Tooey Estate. Individuallyeligible for NR
301 S. Linden Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
317 5. Linden Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
328 5. Linden Dr. SFR 3D 5D 3D/5S3 Significant both as a NR eligibledistrict contributor and asindividually eligible for localdesignation
341 S. Linden Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
417 N. Maple Dr. COM 3S 3 Demo Beverly Hills Mortuary.Demolished
City of Beverly HillsPCR Services Corporation
Historic Resources Survey ReportJune 2004
31
V. Findings and Conclusions
308 S. McCarty Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
321 S. McCarty Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
332 S. McCarty Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
333 S. McCarty Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
1305 S. Park Wy. SFR 3S 4 5S3 Elizabeth Hopper Res.Alterations disqualify dwellingfrom NR eligibility, but eligiblefor local designation
333 5. Peck Dr. SFR 3D 5D 3D/5S3 Significant both as a NR eligibledistrict contributor and asindividually eligible for localdesignation
927 N. Rexford Dr. SFR 5S 5 6L C.P. Butler Res. Substantially. altered. No longer individually
eligible for local listing
332 N. Rodeo Dr. COM 7J 4 iS Anderton Court by Frank UoydWright. Listed in NR
507 N. Rodeo Dr. SFR 5S 4 3CS Don O’Neill Res. Art NouveauRevival. Eligible for CaliforniaRegister
803 N. Rodeo Dr. SFR 3S 3 Demo Eudora Thorkildsen Res.Demolished
332 S. Rodeo Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
822 N. Roxbury Dr. SFR 3S 4 3S Marlene Dietrich Res.Individually eligible for NR
902 N. Roxbury Dr. SFR 6 5 Demo Demolished
312 5. Roxbury Dr. SFR 3D 5D Demo Demolished
320 S. Roxbury Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
321 S. Roxbury Dr. SFR 3D 5D 6L Substantially altered. No longerdistrict contributor
City of Heverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
32
9376 Santa Monica Bi. COM 4S 4 3S Union 76 Service Station.Individually eligible for NR
1143 Summit Dr. SFR 3S 3 6Z Pickfair. Altered beyondrecognition
City of Beverly HillsPCR Services Corporation
Historic Resources Survey ReportJune 2004
V. Fmdin~s and Conclusions1
I
I* I* III
33
V. Findings and Conclusions
1146 Tower Rd. SFR 3S 3 6L George Kolb Estate.Substan~ially altered. No longerindividually eligible for NR
516 Walden Dr. SFR 3S 3 7R Willat Studio Prod. Office. Allexterior sheathing removed.Could not assess
605 Whittier Dr. School 2S2 5D 2S2/5B El Rodeo School. Determinedindividually eligible for NR,district contributor at local level
8444 Wilshire Bi. Theatre 4S 4 3S/5B Fox Wilshire Theatre.Individually eligible for NR,district contributor at local level
8554 Wilshire B!. Theatre 4S 4 3S/5B Regina Wilshire Theatre.Individually eligible for NR,district contributor at local level
9036 Wilshire Bl. Theatre 5S 5D 5B Elite Theatre. Individuallyeligible for local listing and asdistrict contributor at local level
9400 Wilshire B!. Theatre 3S 3 Demo Warner Brothers Theatre.Demolished
9429 Wilshire BI. COM 4S 4 3CS California Bank Bldg. Altered.Individually eligible forCalifornia Register
9600 Wilshire Bi. COM 4S 4 3S/5B Saks Fifth Avenue. Individuallyeligible for NR, districtcontributor at local level
9634 Wilshire Bl. COM 4S 4 3S15B I. Magnin & Co. Individuallyeligible for NR, districtcontributor at local level
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
34
V. Findings and Conclusions
Previously Identified Potential Historic Districts:
The table below summarizes the results of the current assessment of potential historicdistricts and potential district contributors that were previously identified in the 1985-86 survey.
Historic District PCR Description DistrictUpdated ContributorsStatusCode
Alpine Drive 3S Appears eligible for separate listing in the 18Architects Grouping National Register
Arden Drive 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to 46Contractors be individually eligible for local listing orGrouping designation through survey evaluation
Beverly Hills 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to 5Churches Thematic be individually eligible for local listing or
Grouping designation through survey evaluationBeverly Hills 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to 5
Schools Thematic be individually eligible for local listing orGrouping designation through survey evaluation
Beverly Hills 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to 3Neighborhood be individually eligible for local listing or
Theatres Thematic designation through survey evaluationGrouping
Copley Place — 3S Appears eligible for separate listing in the 7Greenway Drive National Register
ResidentialGrouping
Four Corners 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to 4Grouping be individually eligible for local listing or
designation through survey evaluationPre-1920 Residences 5 S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to 18Thematic Grouping be individually eligible for local listing or
designation through survey evaluationTract 7710 3S Appears eligible for separate listing in the 138Residential National RegisterGrouping
Wilshire Boulevard 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to 3Specialty Stores be individually eligible for local listing or
Thematic Grouping designation through survey evaluationTOTAL 247
Note that historic districts themselves are given “S” (separate) ratings, while their contributorsare assigned “D” (district) ratings.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
35
V. Findings and Conclusions
Alpine Drive Architects Grouping (3S), 18 potential contributors
The Alpine Drive Architects Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHP status code by the City in1986, but was elevated to a 3S status code by the OHP. Under the current survey process, the 3Sstatus code given by the OHP for the grouping appeared to be more appropriate. The districtboundaries contain a highly representative grouping of residential architecture designed byprominent and active architects and builders working in Beverly Hills in the 1 920s.Additionally, the overall integrity of the grouping and remaining district contributors is high. Incomparison with other residences and neighborhoods identified in the City during the 1985-86survey process, the Alpine Drive Architects Grouping exists today as one of the best examples ofa grouping of important architects’ and builders’ work remaining in Beverly Hills. The groupingis typical of Beverly Hills in that the parcels that contribute to the historic character of thegrouping display a variety of the revival styles that were popular in the 1920s. TheMediterranean style predominates, but the Tudor, French, and Colonial Revival styles arerepresented as well. Previously, 27 homes out of a possible 37 contributed to the district.During the current survey process 9 properties were removed as contributors to the Alpine DriveArchitects Grouping either due to demolition or because the dwellings experienced significantinappropriate alterations. There now appear to be 18 contributors and 19 non-contributors out ofa possible 37 residences in the district. Despite the loss of 9 contributing properties since theprevious survey, the remainder of 18 contributors appears to meet a minimum threshold ofoverall district integrity for the grouping to appear eligible for listing in the National Register,California Register, and for local listing or designation. However, the demolition or significantalteration of one or two additional contributing residences may well render the district ineligiblefor designation due to an irreparable loss ofdistrict integrity.
Arden Drive Contractors Grouping (5S3), 46 potential contributors
The Arden Drive Contractors Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHP status code by the City in1986, but was elevated to a 3S status code by the OHP. Under the current survey process, theCity’s original 5S3 status code for the grouping was reaffirmed. The district boundaries containrepresentative examples of single-family residences constructed by a variety of local contractorsprimarily in the 1920s whose work appears in neighborhoods throughout the City. Although theoverall integrity of the grouping and district contributors is good, the level of residential designquality achieved by the contractors does not appear to meet the high standards necessary forNational Register eligibility. However, the grouping does appear eligible for local listing ordesignation. The district boundaries, which stretch over the 500, 600, and 700 blocks of bothsides of Arden Drive, are Beverly Gardens on the south and by a pocket of more recentconstruction near Sunset Boulevard on the north. These three blocks contain single-familyresidences in various revival styles and parkways studded with trees that edge the right-of-way.The houses are predominantly Spanish and Mediterranean in style although Tudor, French, andColonial Revival styles are also represented. Previously, 49 homes out of a possible 66contributed to the district. During the current survey process 3 properties were removed ascontributors to the Arden Drive Contractors Grouping either due to demolition or because thedwellings experienced significant inappropriate alterations. There now appear to be 46
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
36
V. Findings and Conclusions
contributors and 20 non-contributors out of a possible 66 residences in the district. Given theloss of only 3 contributing properties since the previous survey, the district retains a high degreeof overall integrity.
Beverly Hills Churches Thematic Grouping (5S3), 5 potential contributors
The Beverly Hills Churches Thematic Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHP status code bythe City in 1986, but was elevated to a 4S status code by the OHP. Under the current surveyprocess, the City’s original 5S3 status code for the grouping was reaffirmed. Following the1985-86 survey, the OHP suggested that the grouping may be eligible for National Registerlisting if more historical or architectural research was performed on the district and itscontributors. This conclusion is equally valid today, however the revised California HistoricalResource Status Codes no longer include a rating code such as 4S that recommends theperformance of additional research in justifying National Register eligibility. Therefore, untilfurther research is conducted, the grouping currently appears eligible only for local listing ordesignation. The grouping is comprised of five historià religious buildings located in the City:three churches on Santa Monica Boulevard between Bedford and Rodeo Drives (Church of theGood Shepherd Catholic Church, All Saints Episcopal Church, Beverly Hills PresbyterianChurch), a fourth church at Rexford Drive and Charleville Boulevard (First Church of ChristScientist), and a parochial school at Linden Drive and Charleville (Church of the Good ShepherdSchool). The three buildings facing Santa Monica Boulevard are variations on Spanish ColonialRevival styling, as is the parochial school. The Christian Science Church is emphaticallyClassical in its design. During the current survey process none of the properties were removedas contributors to the Beverly Hills Churches Thematic Grouping. The five appear to beunaltered since the previous 1985-1986 survey with the result that the grouping retains a highdegree of overall integrity.
Beverly Hills Schools Thematic Grouping (5S3), 5 potential contributors
The Beverly Hills Schools Thematic Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHP status code by theCity in 1986. The OHP, however, did not agree that the five schools constituted a thematicgrouping and, instead, evaluated each resource individually. Under the current survey process,the City’s original 5S3 status code for the grouping was reaffirmed because the grouping is thebest example of school architecture in Beverly Hills from the 1 920s despite alterations and theloss of individual buildings within several of the school campuses. The grouping is comprised offive public school buildings located within the city limits that are variations on Spanish ColonialRevival styling and date, at least in part, from the 1 920s. All of the schools experiencedalterations and additions prior to the 1985-1986 survey, however only the Beverly Vista Schoolhas been substantially altered since the previous survey was completed. Two of the originalhistoric buildings associated with the Beverly Vista School were demolished (Buildings A andD), both of which were previously determined eligible for individual listing and as a thematicgrouping in the National Register. Due to the demolitions and resulting loss of campus integrity,the campus no longer appears eligible for listing in the National Register as a thematic district.However, it appears that Building B (auditorium and classrooms), which was not demolished butsecured with plywood, retains sufficient integrity to remain a contributor to the Beverly HillsSchools Thematic Grouping. Therefore, the Beverly Hills Schools Thematic Grouping,
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
37
V. Findings and Conclusions
including Building B of the Beverly Vista School, retains sufficient overall integrity to continueto appear eligible for local listing or designation.
Beverly Hills Neighborhood Theatres Thematic Grouping (5S3), 3 potentialcontributors
The Beverly Hills Neighborhood Theatres Thematic Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHPstatus code by the City in 1986. The OHP, however, did not agree that the theatres constituted athematic grouping and, instead, evaluated each resource individually. Under the current surveyprocess, the City’s original 5S3 status code for the grouping was reaffirmed because the threetheatres are the only remaining examples of pre-World War II theatres in Beverly Hills with ahigh degree of integrity. This small thematic grouping composed of three theatres on WilshireBoulevard is united by the buildings’ Art Deco designs and neighborhood orientation. They arelocated within half a mile of each other on the south side of Wilshire Boulevard. Following thereassessment of the three properties during the current survey process, the theatres remaincontributors to the Beverly Hills Neighborhood Theatres Thematic Grouping. The three theatresappear to be relatively unaltered since the previous 1985-1986 survey with the result that thegrouping retains a high degree of overall integrity.
Copley Place — Greenway Drive Residential Grouping (3S), 7 potential contributors
The Copley Place — Greenway Drive Residential Grouping was given a 3S NRI{P statuscode by the City in 1986. The OHP, however, did not agree that the theatres constituted aresidential grouping and, instead, evaluated each resource individually. Under the current surveyprocess, the City’s original 3S status code for the grouping was reaffirmed because the sevenresidences are unified by style, date of construction, scale, and type with a high degree ofintegrity. The grouping forms a secluded enclave south and west of Sunset Boulevard at thewestern city limits. Although the two streets are not directly connected, the properties on thenorth side of Greenway form the south side of the Copley cul-de-sac. The residences, four onGreenway and one on Sunset at the Greenway intersection, are included in this grouping for atotal of seven properties. The physical definition of this cluster results not only from theproximity of the properties but also from the topography, with the cluster occupying a knoll atthe edge of the Los Angeles Country Club. All are excellent examples of Mediterranean styles,with one exception (826 Greenway), which is French Revival in inspiration and alsoexceptionally well-executed. During the current survey process none of the properties wereremoved as contributors to the Copley Place — Greenway Drive Residential Grouping althoughtwo of the seven residences (135 Copley Place and 9900 Sunset Boulevard) were not visiblefrom the public right-of-way and could not be re-assessed. The five visible properties appear tobe unaltered with the result that the district retains a high degree of overall integrity.
Four Corners Grouping (5S3), 4 potential contributors
The Four Corners Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHP status code by the City in 1986, butwas elevated to a 4S status code by the OHP. The “Four Corners,” is a grouping of fourcommercial buildings located at the corners of South Beverly Drive’s intersection withCharleville Boulevard. Under the current survey process, the City’s original 5S3 status code for
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
38
V. Findings and Conclusions
the grouping was reaffirmed. Following the 1985-86 survey, the OHP suggested that thegrouping may be eligible for National Register listing when all of the contributors achieved 50years of age because one of the four buildings had been constructed as late as 1950. Each of thefour buildings is Colonial Revival in style. Despite a 12-year gap in construction, the buildings,all relatively intact, relate to each other in terms of style, scale, materials, and detailing, makingthe intersection a notable and cohesive achievement in urban design: Further, they make avisually recognizable grouping, distinct from the buildings around them that act as a focal pointfor this commercial strip. During the current survey process none of the properties wereremoved as contributors to the Four Corners Grouping. The four appear to be relativelyunaltered since the previous 1985-1986 survey with the result that the grouping retains a highdegree of overall integrity. Today (2004), while all four contributors have passed the 50 yearmark, their importance as a cohesive retail grouping in Beverly Hills does not appear to achievea level of local, state or national significance necessary to meet National Register criteria.Instead, the Four Corners Grouping remains a good example of pre- and post-World War II retaildesign clustered at a key intersection in Beverly Hills that appears eligible for local listing ordesignation.
Pre-1920 Residences Thematic Grouping (5S3), 18 potential contributors
The Pre-1920 Residences Thematic Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHP status code by theCity in 1986, but was split into two groupings and elevated to 3S and 4S status codes by theOHP. Under the current survey process, the City’s original 5S3 status code for the grouping wasreaffirmed because the residences are a cohesive and representative collection of pre-1920shomes that are illustrative of the architectural tastes of the time in Beverly Hills~ However, theirimportance as a grouping does not appear to achieve a level of local, state or nationalsignificance necessary to meet National Register criteria. Instead, this age-specific thematicgrouping remains a good example of the wide variety of residential architectural styles popularduring the 1920s in Beverly Hills that appears eligible for local listing or designation. Thisselection of 18 single-family residences is located between Santa Monica Boulevard, SunsetBoulevard, North Camden Drive, and North Crescent Drive. These are some of the streets whichformed the core of the original residential district: Camden, Beverly, Canon, and CrescentDrives. The majority of the contributors are Colonial Revival in style with Craftsman, MissionRevival, and Mediterranean styles also represented. Given the age-specific nature of thethematic grouping, which includes representative examples from four streets, a total number ofpossible contributors was not determined. During the current survey process 4 of the 18properties were removed as contributors to the Pre-1920 Residences Thematic Grouping eitherdue to demolition or because the dwellings experienced significant inappropriate alterations.There now appear to be 14 contributors in the district. Despite the loss of 4 contributingproperties since the previous survey, the thematic grouping retains a high level of overallintegrity.
Tract 7710 Residential Grouping (3S), 138 potential contributors
The Tract 7710 Residential Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHP status code by the City in1986, but was elevated to a 3S status code by the OHP. Under the current survey process, the 3Sstatus code given by the OHP for the grouping appeared to be more appropriate. The district
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
39
V. Findings and Conclusions
boundaries contain a highly representative grouping of residential architecture designedprimarily in the Spanish Colonial Revival style in Beverly Hills in the 1920s and 1930s.Additionally, the overall integrity of the grouping and remaining district contributors is high. Incomparison with other residences and neighborhoods identified in the City during the 1985-86survey process, the Tract 7710 Residential Grouping exists today as one of the best examples ofa neighborhood of generously-scaled, Spanish Colonial Revival dwellings, with a high degree ofintegrity, remaining in Beverly Hills. The potential district is a neighborhood of dwellingswhose boundaries include the south side of Gregory Way, the alley north of Olympic Boulevard,the east property lines of the east side of El Camino Drive, and the west property lines of thewest side of Linden Drive. The district consists of the 300 blocks of eight streets: South LindenDrive, South McCarty Drive, South Roxbury Drive, South Bedford Drive, South Peck Drive,South Camden Drive, South Rodeo Drive, and South El Camino Drive. The level streets arelined by parkways and punctuated by street trees. The majority of the residences are amply-sized, two-story homes that are typically rectangular or L-shaped (with courtyard) in plan.Spanish Colonial Revival styling, more than any other characteristic of the district, is its unifyingfeature. Previously, 157 homes out of a possible 196 contributed to the district. During thecurrent survey process 17 properties were removed as contributors to the Tract 7710 ResidentialGrouping either due to demolition or because the dwellings experienced significant inappropriatealterations. Two properties could not be re-evaluated due to lack of visibility from the publicright-of-way. There now appear to be 138 contributors and 56 non-contributors out of a possible196 residences in the district. Despite the loss of 17 contributing properties since the previoussurvey, the district retains a high degree of overall integrity.
Wilshire Boulevard Specialty Stores Thematic Grouping (5S3), 3 potentialcontributors
The Wilshire Boulevard Specialty Stores Thematic Grouping was given a 5S3 NRHPstatus code by the City in 1986. The OHP, however, did not agree that the stores constituted athematic grouping and, instead, evaluated each resource individually. Under the current surveyprocess, the City’s original 5S3 status code for the grouping was reaffirmed because the threecontributing multi-story commercial buildings are the only remaining examples of pre-WoridWar II department stores in Beverly Hills. The spine of the Beverly Hills commercial district,Wilshire Boulevard, is the site of three specialty department stores which occupy historicallysignificant buildings. All of the buildings are located between Rodeo and Roxbury Drives andare fashionable and sophisticated in their designs. The stores exhibit stylized characteristicsassociated with the Moderne, Neo-Classical, and French modes. During the current surveyprocess none of the three properties were removed as contributors to the Wilshire BoulevardSpecialty Stores Thematic Grouping. Of the three properties, only 9536 Wilshire Boulevard hasexperienced noteworthy alterations since the previous survey (including the replacement of a flatcanopy for canvas awnings on the ground level and the replacement of upper story multi-panesash windows with single-pane fixed glazing). However, these alterations have not materiallyaffected the overall integrity of the building or of the district as a whole. Therefore, the WilshireBoulevard Specialty Stores Thematic Grouping continues to appear eligible for local listing ordesignation.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
40
V. Findings and Conclusions
C. AREA 4 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE SURVEY
Part II of the current survey process involved the reconnaissance-level survey of allindividual multi-family residences located within Area 4 of the City (south of WilshireBoulevard within the City’s east, west, and south municipal boundaries) constructed prior to1961. The current survey identified 622 individual properties meeting these criteria, each ofwhich were recorded on State Inventory Primary Record forms (DPR 523A). As part of the PartII survey process, an important element was the preliminary identification of potential historicdistricts consisting of multi-family dwellings within Area 4 and their associated contributors.
Five potential historic districts containing a total of 268 contributing properties wereidentified within Area 4 based on the application of applicable federal, state, and local criteriarelevant to historic districts. Preliminary NRHP Status Codes were assigned to each potentialdistrict based on the reconnaissance-level survey. It must be noted that these preliminary NRHPStatus Codes are based primarily on field observations and a minimal level of current historicalresearch of multi-family residences, neighborhoods, and tracts in Area 4. In order to validatethese preliminary findings, a thorough context statement encompassing each potential districtbased upon in-depth property-specific and district-wide research should be conducted in asubsequent survey process.
Survey Summary:
Status Description Historic IndividualCode Districts Properties3S/5B Appears eligible for NR as an individual property through 2
survey evaluation. Appears to be a contributor to a districtthat appears eligible for local listing or designation throughsurvey evaluation
3CS Appears eligible for CR as an individual property through 1survey evaluation
5S3 Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or 5 3designation through survey evaluation
5D3 Appears to be a contributor to a district that appears eligible 239for local listing or designation through survey evaluation
5B Locally significant both individually and as a contributor to a 27district that appears eligible for local listing or designationthrough survey evaluation
6L Determined ineligible for local listing or designation through 239local government review process; may warrant specialconsideration in local planning
6Z Found ineligible for NR, CR or local designation through 109survey evaluation
7R Not evaluated 1DEMO Demolished 1
TOTAL 5 622
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
41
V. Findings and Conclusions
Area 4 MFR District Summary:
Historic District Status Description IndividualCode Properties
Tract 7710 MFR 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to be 114District individually eligible for local listing or designation
through survey evaluationSmithwood Drive 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to be 10
MFR District individually eligible for local listing or designationthrough survey evaluation
Beverly Vista MFR 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to be 55District individually eligible for local listing or designation
through survey evaluationSouth Roxbury- 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to be 37
Bedford Drive MFR individually eligible for local listing or designationDistrict through survey evaluation
Olympic Boulevard 5S3 Not eligible for National Register, but appears to be 52MFR District individually eligible for local listing or designation
through survey evaluationTOTAL 268
Note that historic districts themselves are given “S” (separate) ratings, while their contributorsare assigned “D” (district) ratings.
The following paragraphs briefly summarize the characteristics that give coherence toeach of the five potential historic districts. Each district’s preliminary NRI{P Status Code isnoted next to the district’s name, followed by the total number of contributing propertiesassociated with the district. Although under the current reconnaissance-level survey the districtsdo not appear eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register, all five of thedistricts appear to be eligible for local listing or designation. Appendix C is a database propertylisting of all 622 multi-family residences identified in Area 4; Appendix F contains the PrimaryRecord forms (DPR 523A) for all of these residences. For a database property listing of theaddresses of all 268 potential contributors to the five potential historic districts, please refer toAppendix D.
Tract 7710 MFR District (5S3), 114 potential contributors
The Tract 7710 MFR District possesses a significant concentration of middle-class,multi-family dwellings that are reflective of period revival-style residential development inBeverly Hills in the period between the two World Wars. District contributors exhibit amoderate to high-level of physical integrity. This large district is a distinct and cohesive multifamily residential district with few disruptive intrusions that was developed on Walter G.McCarty’s Tract No. 7710, primarily during the 1930s. Although the tract was later referred toas the “Speedway Tract,” further research is necessary to conclude that this was the commonly
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
42
V. Findings and Conclusions
accepted name for the tract by both the developers and the public. The tract includes the entirearea situated between South El Camino Drive and Moreno Drive on the east and west,respectively, and Wilshire Boulevard and Olympic Boulevard on the north and south.
The Tract 7710 MFR District contains primarily two-story duplexes, fourplexes, and six-and eight-unit apartment buildings designed in a variety of period revival architectural stylesincluding French Eclectic, Spanish Colonial Revival, Monterrey Revival, Colonial Revival, andEnglish or Tudor Revival. Vernacular modem style buildings with varying levels of appliedrevival-style decorative elements are also represented in the district.
The district is comprised of 114 contributing multi-family residences located south ofWilshire Boulevard and north of Olympic Boulevard, east of Moreno Drive and west of SouthRodeo Drive. More specifically, district contributors are situated along both sides of the 9900blocks of Robbins and Young Drives; the 200 block of South Lasky Drive; the 100, 200, and 300blocks of South Spalding Drive; and the South 100 blocks of Linden, McCarty, Roxbury,Bedford, Peck, and Camden Drives. Many of the multi-family dwellings were designed, built,and/or owned by developers with some of the most active including Walter Bollenbacher, AlbertRothenberg, and M. Waldo. Additionally, many architects were involved in designing thesebuildings, including several prominent architects such as Sumner Spaulding (9941 Durant Drive)and Armond Monaco (9956 Robbins Drive).
The district exhibits a consistently high level of architectural quality, in good conditionwith minimal alterations, leading to a high percentage of contributors versus non-contributors.Lots typically measure approximately 50 or 60 feet by 120 to 130 feet, however in some casesparcels were combined to accommodate larger multi-family dwellings. Building footprints aregenerally rectangular, although some contributors are L-shaped in plan. Many of the multifamily dwellings share common setbacks from the street and rear service alleys where (detached)carports or garages are accessed. Paved paths (usually concrete) lead from the sidewalks toentrances on primary or secondary elevations. Front yard and courtyard landscaping is generallyfull and mature with hedges, trees, and sometimes grassy lawns. A single species of tree (such asMaple, Magnolia, Ficus or Elm) distinguishes each of the district’s streets.
Smithwood Drive MFR District (5S3), 10 potential contributors
The Smithwood Drive MFR District consists of a significant concentration of middle-class, multi-family dwellings that are reflective of period revival-style residential development inBeverly Hills in the period between the two World Wars. District contributors exhibit a high-level of physical integrity. This small district, entirely contained within Tract 3535, is a densemulti-family residential district with few disruptive intrusions that was developed mostly duringthe late 1920s and early 1930s. Notable for its visual distinctiveness and cohesiveness, thedistrict contains primarily two-story duplexes and several triplexes designed in the FrenchEclectic and Spanish Colonial Revival architectural styles. There are also two examples of theRegency style represented in the district. The District is comprised of 10 contributing multifamily residences situated along the east side of the 400 block of Smithwood Drive on a diagonalstreet that intersects South Beverwil Drive on the north and Whitworth Drive on the south.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
43
V. Findings and Conclusions
Preliminary research suggests that a mix of architects and owner/contractors were responsible forthe design and construction of the contributing buildings.
The district exhibits a consistently high level of architectural quality, in good conditionwith minimal alterations, leading to a high percentage of contributors versus non-contributors.Lots typically measure approximately 55 by 120 feet. Building footprints are generallyrectangular, although some contributors are L-shaped in plan. The contributing buildings sharecommon setbacks from the street and rear service alleys where (detached) carports or garages areaccessed. Paved paths (usually concrete) lead from the sidewalks to entrances on primary orsecondary elevations. Front yard and courtyard landscaping is generally full and mature withhedges, trees, and grassy lawns. Mature magnolia trees distinguish the street.
Beverly Vista MFR District (5S3), 55 potential contributors
The Beverly Vista MFR District consists of a significant concentration of middle-class,multi-family dwellings that are reflective of period revival-style residential development inBeverly Hills in the period between the two World Wars. The name “Beverly Vista” given tothis district is based upon an advertisement by developer Walter G. McCarty (Los Angeles Times,April 29, 1928, V-il) in which he refers to the tract as “Beverly Vista.” District contributorsexhibit a moderate to high-level of physical integrity. This large district is a dense multi-familyresidential district with few disruptive intrusions that was developed on Tract No. 6380 that wasassociated with developer Walter G. McCarty and other investors, primarily during the latei920s and 1930s. The tract includes the entire area situated between Preuss Road (now SouthRobertson Boulevard) and Beverly Drive on the east and west, respectively, and WilshireBoulevard and Olympic Boulevard on the north and south.
This visually distinct and cohesive district contains primarily two-story duplexes,fourplexes, and six-, eight-, and ten-unit apartment buildings designed in a variety of periodrevival architectural styles including French Eclectic, Spanish Colonial Revival, MonterreyRevival, Colonial Revival, and English or Tudor Revival. Vernacular modern style buildingswith varying levels of applied revival-style decorative elements are also represented in thedistrict.
Within the tract, the district is comprised of 55 contributing multi-family residenceslocated along a narrow band of streets sandwiched between Wilshire Boulevard and CharlevilleBoulevard, to the north and south, respectively, and South Beverly Drive and South OakhurstDrive to the west and east. More specifically, district contributors are situated along both sidesof the South 100 blocks of Reeves, Canon, Crescent, Elm, Rexford, Maple and Palm Drives.Preliminary research suggests that a mix of architects and owner/contractors, including theprolific Walter Bollenbacher, were responsible for the design and construction of thecontributing buildings.
The district exhibits a consistently high level of architectural quality, in good conditionwith minimal alterations, leading to a high percentage of contributors versus non-contributors.Lots typically measure approximately 50 feet by 120 feet, however in some cases parcels were
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
44
V. Findings and Conclusions
combined to accommodate larger multi-family dwellings. Building footprints are generallyrectangular, although some contributors are L-shaped in plan. Many of the multi-familydwellings share common setbacks from the street and rear service alleys where (detached)carports or garages are accessed. Paved paths (usually concrete) lead from the sidewalks toentrances on primary or secondary elevations. Front yard and courtyard landscaping is generallyfull and mature with hedges, trees, and sometimes grassy lawns. A single species of tree (such asMaple, Elm, or a variety of Palm) distinguishes each of the district’s streets.
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District (5S3), 37 potential contributors
The South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District consists of a significant concentrationof middle-class, multi-family dwellings that are reflective of period revival style residentialdevelopment in Beverly Hills in the period between the two World Wars. District contributorsexhibit a moderate to high-level of physical integrity. This small district, entirely containedwithin Tract 3535, is a dense multi-family residential district with few disruptive intrusions thatwas developed mostly during the late 1920s and early 1930s. Notable for its visualdistinctiveness and cohesiveness, the district contains two-story duplexes and a few fourplexesdesigned primarily in the Spanish Colonial Revival architectural style. There are also a fewexamples of the French Eclectic and Colonial Revival styles represented in the district. Thedistrict is comprised of 37 contributing multi-family residences located between OlympicBoulevard on the north and the municipal boundary of Beverly Hills on the south. Districtcontributors are situated along the east side of the 400 block of South Roxbury Drive and bothsides of the 400 block of South Bedford Drive. Preliminary research suggests that a mix ofarchitects and owner/contractors were responsible for the design and construction of thecontributing buildings.
The district exhibits a consistently high level of architectural quality, in good conditionwith minimal alterations, leading to a high percentage of contributors versus non-contributors.Lots typically measure approximately 50 by 123 feet. Building footprints are generallyrectangular, although some contributors are L-shaped in plan. The contributing buildings sharecommon setbacks from the street and rear service alleys. Detached garages or carports aregenerally located behind the dwellings along the rear parcel lines with access via drivewaysleading from the street. Paved paths (usually concrete) lead from the sidewalks to entrances onprimary or secondary elevations. Front yard and courtyard landscaping is generally full andmature with hedges, trees, and grassy lawns. Mature maple trees distinguish the street.
Olympic Boulevard MFR District (5S3), 52 potential contributors
The Olympic Boulevard MFR District possesses a significant concentration of middle-class, multi-family dwellings that are reflective of period revival-style residential development inBeverly Hills in the period between the two World Wars. District contributors exhibit amoderate to high-level of physical integrity. This large district is a dense multi-familyresidential district with some non-contributing intrusions that was developed primarily during the1 930s along Olympic Boulevard, historically and presently a busy and important east-west
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services CorporatIon June 2004
45
V. Findings and Conclusions
thoroughfare in Beverly Hills. The district includes parcels located within Tracts 11143, 7710,3535, and 6380 that are situated on both sides of Olympic Boulevard between South RexfordDrive on the east and Shirley Place on the west. Within the district, a short segment of non-contributing commercial properties exists along Olympic Boulevard at South Beverly Drivebetween South El Camino Drive and South Reeves Drive.
Visually distinctive and cohesive, the Olympic Boulevard MFR District contains a broadmix of two-story duplexes, fourplexes, and six-, eight-, twelve-unit and larger apartmentbuildings designed in a variety of period revival architectural styles with French Eclectic,Spanish Colonial Revival, and Colonial Revival styles predominating. Vernacular modern stylebuildings with varying levels of applied revival-style decorative elements are also represented inthe district.
The district is comprised of 52 contributing multi-family residences. Many of the multifamily dwellings were designed, built, and/or owned by developers with some of the most activeincluding Joe Endemiller, Ma Hull, and Albert Rothenberg. Additionally, many architects wereinvolved in designing these buildings, including several prominent architects such as Horatio W.Bishop (9373 Olympic Boulevard) and W. George Lutzi (9800 Olympic Boulevard).
The district exhibits a consistently high level of architectural quality, in primarilymoderate to good condition with minimal alterations, leading to a significant percentage ofcontributors versus non-contributors. Lots typically measure approximately 50 to 70 feet by 110to 120 feet, however in some cases parcels were combined to accommodate larger multi-familydwellings. Building footprints are generally rectangular, although some contributors are Lshaped in plan. A number of the contributors are mirror images of adjacent dwellings that sharecommon courtyards between them. Many of the multi-family dwellings share common setbacksfrom the street and rear service alleys where (detached) carports or garages are accessed. Pavedpaths (usually concrete) lead from the sidewalks to entrances on primary or secondary elevations.Front yard and courtyard landscaping is generally full and mature with hedges, trees, andsometimes grassy lawns.
Area 4 MFR Survey High1i~hts:
Listed below is a subset of highlights from the current survey of 622 multi-familyresidential properties identified in Area 4. Included are those properties that appear individuallyeligible for federal, state, or local designation. Many of these properties are also potentialcontributors to one of the five newly identified potential historic districts. There are 38 surveyedproperties meeting these criteria.
Address Status Year Architectural Style CommentCode Built
149 S. Bedford Dr. 5B 1936 French Eclectic Good, representative example.Individually eligible and district
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
46
V. Findings and Conclusions
contributor at local level
418 S. Canon Dr. 5S3 1948 Vernacular Modern Good, representative example.Individually eligible at local level
157 S. Crescent Dr. 5B 1935 French Eclectic Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9920 Durant Dr. 5S3 1937 Chateauesque Good example of large apartmentbuilding constructed in the style.Individually eligible at local level
203 5. Lasky Dr. 5B 1930 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
228 S. Lasky Dr. 5S3 1928 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible at local level
350 S. McCarty Dr. 5S3 1955 Modern Good and rare example of Modernapartment building with fiberglassgrid screen
355 S. McCarty Dr. 5S3 1936 Chateauesque Good example of large apartmentbuilding constructed in the style.Individually eligible at local level
9318 Olympic Bl. 5B 1935 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9330 Olympic BI. 5B 1934 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9367 Olympic BI. 5B 1934 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9373 Olympic Bl. SB 1937 French Eclectic Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9379 Olympic Bl. SB 1930 Span. Col. Revival Good example of large apartmentbuilding constructed in the style.Individually eligible at local level
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
47
V. Findings and Conclusions
9384 Olympic Bl. 5B 1935 Colonial Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9400 Olympic B!. 3CS 1948 Modern Avalon Hotel. Excellent example ofstyle and type. Individually eligiblefor California Register and at locallevel
9545 Olympic Bl. 5B 1936 French Eclectic Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level. Twin of9553 Olympic Bi.
9553 Olympic Bi. 5B 1936 French Eclectic Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level. Twin of9545 Olympic Bl.
9654 Olympic B!. 5B 1935 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9657 Olympic Bi. 5B 1936 French Eclectic Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
148 S. Palm Dr. 5B 1930 Span. Col. Revival Good example of large apartmentbuilding constructed in the style.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
133 S. Peck Dr. SB 1931 Vernacular Brick Good, rare example of large, multistory apartment buildingconstructed of brick. Individuallyeligible and district contributor atlocal level
148 S. Peck Dr. 5B 1931 hal. Rennaissance Good, rare example of large, multi-Revival story apartment building
constructed in the style.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
48
V. Findings and Conclusions
224 S. Reeves Dr. 3S/5B 1935 Streamline Excellent, rare example of style.Moderne Individually eligible for NR and
local register, district contributor atlocal level
256 5. Reeves Dr. 5S3 1926 Tudor Revival Good, rare example of style.Individually eligible at local level
328 S. Rexford Dr. 5S3 1956 Vernacular Modern Good, representative example ofstyle. Individually eligible at locallevel
9948 Robbins Dr. SB 1940 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
9956 Robbins Dr. 3S/5B 1936 Streamline Excellent, rare example of style.Moderne Individually eligible for NR and
local register, district contributor atlocal level
9966 Robbins Dr. 5B 1936 Moderne Good, rare example of style.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
355 S. Rodeo Dr. 5S3 1936 Streamline Good example of StreamlineModerne/Colonial Moderne style. Individually eligibleRevival at local level
137 S. Roxbury Dr. 5B 1931 Monterrey Revival Good example of style. Individuallyeligible and district contributor atlocal level
145 S. Roxbury Dr. 5S3 1948 Colonial Revival Good example of style. Individuallyeligible at local level
152 5. Roxbury Dr. SB 1936 Chateauesque Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
440 5. Roxbury 5S3 1965 Modern Frank Gehry’s penthouse additions1982 are a good example of his work.
Individually eligible at local level
444 Smithwood Dr. 5B 1940 Regency Good, representative example ofstyle. Individually eligible anddistrict contributor at local level
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
49
V. Findings and Conclusions
252 S. Spalding Dr. 5B 1928 Tudor Revival Good, rare example of style.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level
304 S. Spalding Dr. 5B 1935 Span. Col. Revival Good, representative example ofstyle. Individually eligible anddistrict contributor at local level
9929 Young Dr. 5B 1937 Chateauesque Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level. Twin of9933 Young Dr.
9933 Young Dr. SB 1936 Chateauesque Good, representative example.Individually eligible and districtcontributor at local level. Twin of9929 Young Dr.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
50
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS
A. INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents recommendations for further research and the protection ofpotentially significant cultural resources. Preservation of the identified cultural resources shouldbe encouraged because they provide a visual representation of the City’s history. Some of theobjectives of Title 10, Chapter 10, Article 32 are to preserve any site, building, or structure ofparticular historic or cultural significance to the City, such as historic structures or sites in whichthe broad cultural, political, economic, or social history of the nation, state, or community isreflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with importantevents in the main currents of national, state, or local history, or which embody thedistinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study ofa period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer, orarchitect whose individual genius influences his age.
Within the City of Beverly Hills, cultural resources are not required to be listed in theNational Register to be considered historical or cultural landmarks. The City’s Municipal Code,(Title 10, Chapter 10, Article 32), authorizes the Architectural Commission to serve in anadvisory capacity to the City Council on the preservation of historic and cultural landmarks inthe City.
B. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE
Access should be gained to those properties that could not be re-evaluated during thesurvey process due to lack of visibility from the public right-of-way and re-assessed.Additionally, properties that could not be re-evaluated because of renovations/constructionshould be re-assessed. Using GIS mapping capabilities, properties identified in the surveyupdate should be mapped according to various criteria including building type, architecturalstyle, rating code, decade (or year) of construction, etc.
Upon acceptance of the findings and conclusions of the survey update, those propertiesidentified as appearing individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Placesshould be reviewed, more exhaustively researched, and formally nominated for designation.Additionally, the historic districts, individual district contributors, and community designfeatures identified as appearing eligible for National Register listing should be thoroughlyresearched and nominated. Because of potential impacts to their integrity, these propertiesshould be nominated within the next twelve months. (See database listings in Appendix B forspecific addresses)
Upon adoption of a structured and formalized process for designating cultural resourcesas City of Beverly Hills Landmarks, those properties that were identified as potentially eligible
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
51
V. Findings and Conclusions
for local designation should be reviewed, more exhaustively researched, and if applicable,formally nominated for such designation. Similarly, those areas within the City identified asappearing eligible for local designation as historic districts, along with their individualcontributors, should be thoroughly researched and nominated. (See database listings inAppendix B for specific addresses)
C. AREA 4 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE SURVEY
It is recommended that the subsequent phase of this survey include an in-depth contextstatement covering multi-family residential development in the City of Beverly Hills prior toWorld War II. It is also recommended that research and documentation of the 272 individualresources identified in the Area 4 MFR Survey having preliminary rating codes of 5 or higher becompleted using Building, Structure, and Object Record forms (DPR 523B). Followingadditional research, individual properties meeting eligibility requirements for National Registeror California Register listing may become apparent. Using GIS mapping capabilities, propertiesidentified in the Area 4 MFR Survey should be mapped according to various criteria includingbuilding type, architectural style, rating code, decade (or year) of construction, etc.
Additionally, the five potential historic districts identified in the Area 4 MFR Surveyshould be thoroughly documented using District Record forms (DPR 523D). Based uponpreliminary research, it appears that there may be evidence for a noncontiguous post-World WarII district or grouping in Area 4 based on architectural style and MFR building type. Furtherresearch will be necessary in order to validate this conclusion.
Upon acceptance of the findings and conclusions of the Area 4 MFR Survey, those fewproperties identified as appearing individually eligible for listing in the National Register ofHistoric Places and the California Register should be reviewed, more exhaustively researched,and formally nominated for designation. (See database listings in Appendix C for specificaddresses)
Upon adoption of a structured and formalized process for designating cultural resourcesas City of Beverly Hills Landmarks, those properties that were identified as potentiallyindividually eligible for local designation should be reviewed, more exhaustively researched, andif applicable, formally nominated for such designation. Similarly, those areas within the Cityidentified as appearing eligible for local designation as historic districts, along with theirindividual contributors, should be thoroughly researched and nominated. (See database listingsin Appendix C for specific addresses)
D. PRESERVATION STRATEGIES
Historic preservation is addressed in the City’s Municipal Code. The City’s MunicipalCode, (Title 10, Chapter 10, Article 32), authorizes the City’s Architectural Commission to servein an advisory capacity to the City Council on the preservation of historic and cultural landmarksin the City. In assisting the Architectural Commission in its duties, the following are: (a)strategies or requirements to encourage owners of cultural resources to rehabilitate rather thandemolish their buildings; and (b) suggestions for promoting the building’s history in a way which
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
52
V. Findings and Conclusions
provides public benefit without being detrimental to the owners and which further the objectivesof the City’s preservation ordinance.
Incorporate significant structures into redevelopment programs. If existingproperties are structurally sound, they can be renovated to their original appearance. If nophotos, plans, or other documentation exists, the original appearances can be recreated based onremaining materials, and existing features and pictures of similar buildings. In addition toexisting properties or in cases of adaptive reuse, appropriate methods of compatible designshould be employed, where scale; massing; materials; and color scheme are derived from theexisting context.
Incorporate compatible design methods in new construction. Any areas that will beredeveloped should incorporate compatible design methods. This can be accomplished throughcompatible design in the use of complementary scale, massing, and materials in new constructionand in reuse of existing buildings through additions and adaptations.
Preservation Incentives. Economic and other incentives to support the preservation,maintenance, and appropriate rehabilitation of cultural resources should be actively promoted tohomeowners and commercial property owners. Such incentives may includefaçade/conservation easements, Mills Act contracts, use of the State Historical Building Code,waivers and reductions ofpermit fees, and broader range of conditionally permitted uses.
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
53
VIII. APPENDICES
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
54
Appendix A: National Register Status Codes Categories
Appendix B: Database Property Listing: Historic Resources Survey Update
Appendix C: Database Property Listing: Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey
Appendix D: Database Property Listing: Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey, PotentialHistoric Districts
Appendix E: Historic Resources Survey Update. State Inventory Forms—DPR 523LForms
Appendix F: Area 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey. State Inventory Forms—DPR 523AForms
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
APPENDIX A
National Register Status Codes Categories
City of Beverly fills Historic Rewurces Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
California Historical Resource Status Codes
Properties listed in the National Register (NR) or the California Register (CR)10 Contributor to a district or multiple resource property listed in NR by the Keeper. Listed in the CR.iS Individual property listed in NR by the Keeper. Listed in the CR.
iCD Listed in the CR as a contributor to a district or multiple resource property by the SHRC1CS Listed in the CR as indMdual property by the SHRC.1CL Automatically listed in the California Register — Includes State Historical Landmarks 770 and above and Points of Historical
Interest nominated after December 1997 and recommended for listing by the SHRC.
2 Properties determined eligible for listing in the National Register (NR) or the California Register (CR)2B Determined eligible for NR as an individual property and as a contributor to an eligible district in a federal regulatory process.
Listed in the CR.2D Contributor to a district determined eligible for NR by the Keeper. Listed in the CR.2D2 Contributor to a district determined eligible for NR by consensus through Section 106 process. Listed in the CR.2D3 Contributor to a district determined eligible for NR by Part I Tax Certification. Listed in the CR.204 Contributor to a district determined eligible for NR pursuant to Section 106 without review by SHPO. Listed in the CR.2S Individual property determined eligible for NR by the Keeper. Listed in the CR.2S2 Individual property determined eligible for NR by a consensus through Section 106 process. listed in the CR.2S3 Individual property determined eligible for NR by Part I Tax Certification. Listed in the CR.2S4 Individual property determined eligible for NR pursuant to Section 106 without review by SHPO. Listed in the CR.
2CB Determined eligible for CR as an individual property and as a contributor to an eligible district by the SHRC.2CD Contributor to a district determined eligible for listing in the CR by the SHRC.2CS Individual property determined eligible for listing in the CR by the SHRC.
3 Appears eligible for National Register (NR) or California Register (CR) through Survey Evaluation3B Appears eligible for NR both individually and as a contributor to a NR eligible district through survey evaluation.3D Appears eligible for NR as a contributor to a NR eligible district through survey evaluation.35 Appears eligible for NR as an individual property through survey evaluation.
3CB Appears eligible for CR both indMdually and as a contributor to a CR eligible district through a survey evaluation.3d) Appears eligible for CR as a contributor to a CR eligible district through a survey evaluation.3(3 Appears eligible for CR as an indMdual property through survey evaluation.
i4~ ~j~Appears e1~ibIe for~~ tiona1Registér~Nl~) orCalifornia RegI~ter~CR)thi&u~h other evalua~i6i~Ii~4CM Master list - State Owned Properties - PRC §5024.
5D1 Contributor to a district that Is listed or designated locally.5D2 Contributor to a district that is eligible for local listing or designation.5D3 Appears to be a contributor to a district that appears eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation.
5S1 Individual property that is listed or designated locally.5S2 Individual property that is eligible for local listing or designation.5S3 Appears to be indMdually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation.
58 Locally significant both Individually (listed, eligible, or appears eligible) and as a contributor to a district that is locally listed,designated, determined eligible or appears eligible through survey evaluation.
6 .~Not Eligible for Listing or DesignatiOn as specified6C Determined ineligible for or removed from California Register by SHRC.6J Landmarks or Points of Interest found ineligible for designation by SHRC.6L Determined ineligible for local listing or designation through local government review process; may warrant spedal consideration
in local planning.6T Determined ineligible for NR through Part I Tax Certification process.6U Determined ineligible for NR pursuant to Section 106 without review by SKPO.6W Removed from NR by the Keeper.6X Determined ineligible for the NR by SHRC or Keeper.6Y Determined ineligible for NR by consensus through Section 106 process — Not evaluated for CR or Local Listing.6Z Found ineligible for NR, CR or Local designation through survey evaluation.
7 Not Evaluated for National Register (NR) or California Register (CR) or Needs Revaluation7J Received by OHP for evaluation or action but not yet evaluated.7K Resubmitted to OHP for action but not reevaluated.7L State Historical Landmarks 1-769 and Points of Historical Interest designated prior to January 1998 — Needs to be reevaluated
using current standards.7M Submitted to OHP but not evaluated - referred to NPS.7N Needs to be reevaluated (Formerly NR Status Cede 4)7N1 Needs to be reevaluated (Formerly NR SC4) — may become eligible for NR w/restoration or when meets other spedfic conditions.7R Identified in Reconnaissance Level Survey: Not evaluated.7W Submitted to OHP for action — withdrawn.
12/8/2003
APPENDIX B
Database Property ListingHistoric Resources Survey Update
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
— fl _
Historic Resources Survey Update
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
703 North Alpine 4341-028-022 J.R. Wesselne Residence 3D 5D 3D
705 North Alpine 4341-028-021 Harry G. Anderson Residence 3D 5D DEMO
706 North Alpine 4341-025-003 R.B. Murphy Residence 3D 5D 3D
707 North Alpine 4341-028-020 Herbert Robbins Residence 3D 5D 6L
709 North Alpine 4341-028-019 F.A. Blensberg Residence 3D 5D 3D
710 North Alpine 4341-025-005 E.P. Dentzel Residence 3D 5D DEMO
711 North Alpine 4341-028-018 Paul A. Jesberg Residence 3D 5D 3D
713 North Alpine 4341-028-017 F.D. Parker Residence 3D 5D 3D
714 North Alpine 4341-025-007 Samuel Mortensen Residence 3D 5D 3D
715 North Alpine 4341-028-016 Harry G. Anderson Residence 3D 5D DEMO
716 North Alpine 4341-025-008 Frank Charon Residence 3D 5D DEMO
717 North Alpine 4341-028-015 Sara B. Hughes Residence 3D SD 3D
721 North Alpine 4341 -028-013 S.C. Roew Residence 3D 5D DEMO
722 North Alpine 4341-025-011 Ralph Kinsey Residence 3D 5D 3D
724 North Alpine 4341-025-012 Ralph Kinsey Residence 3D 5D 3D
801 North Alpine 4341-027-014 Kate Greppin Residence 3D SD 3D
802 North Alpine 4341-026-001 Addle Greenfield Residence 3D 5D DEMO
803 North Alpine 4341-027-013 30 5D 3D
804 North Alpine 4341-026-002 W.S. McGilvray Residence 3D 5D 3D
805 North Alpine 4341-027-012 Nelson Eddy Residence 3D 5D 6L
806 North Alpine 4341-026-003 Elizabeth Hlnckley Residence 3D 5D 3D
808 North Alpine 4341-026-004 Theodore R. Cadwallader Residence 3D 5D DEMO
810 North Alpine 4341-026-005 3D 5D 3D
811 North Alpine 4341-027-009 Aleck Curlett ResIdence 3D 5D 3D
812 North Alpine 4341-026-006 LW. Newbert Residence 3D 5D 3D
Page 1 of 15
— — ~— —
Address814
816
918
2004 OHPDirection Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
North Alpine 4341-026-007 A.M.G. (Henry) Bertolotti Residence 3D 5D 3D
North Alpine 4341-026-008 3D 5D 3D
North Alpine 4350-008-023 O.B. English Residence 3D 3 7R
Alpine Drive Architects Alpine Drive Architects Grouping 3S 5S 3S
634 North Aita 4341-002-017 Samuel M. Lee Residence 3S 3 5S3
1801 Angelo 4348-020-011 Jack L. Warner Estate 4S 3 7R
506 North Arden 4341-004-003 3D 5D 5D3
507 North Arden 4341-009-025 3D 50 5D3
508 North Arden 4341-004-004 3D 5D 5D3
509 North Arden 4341-009-024 3D 5D 5D3
510 North Arden 4341-004-005 3D 5D 5D3
511 North Arden 4341-009-023 3D 5D 5D3
512 North Arden 4341-004-006 3D 5D 5D3
514 North Arden 4341-004-007 3D 5D 5D3
515 North Arden 4341-009-021 3D 50 5D3
516 North Arden 4341-004-008 3D 50 5D3
518 North Arden 4341-004-009 3D 5D 503
519 North Arden 4341-009-019 3D 50 503
520 North Arden 4341-004-010 3D 5D 5D3
521 North Arden 4341-009-018 3D 50 503
522 North Arden 4341-004-011 3D 5D 503
523 North Arden 4341-009-017 3D SD 5D3
524 North Arden 4341-004-012 3D 50 503
525 North Arden 4341-009-016 3D 5D DEMO
527 North Arden 4341-009-015 3D 50 503
603 North Arden 4341-008-031 3D 50 503
604 North Arden 4341-005-001 3D 5D 503
Page2ofl5
:~-H *—~ ~
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
605 North Arden 4341-008-030 3D 5D 5D3
606 North Arden 4341-005-003 3D 5D 5D3
607 North Arden 4341-008-029 3D 5D 5D3
610 North Arden 4341-005-005 3D 5D 5D3
611 North Arden 4341-008-027 3D 5D 5D3
612 North Arden 4341-005-006 3D 5D 5D3
613 North Arden 4341-008-026 3D 5D 5D3
615 North Arden 4341-008-025 3D 5D 5D3
617 North Arden 4341-008-024 3D 5D DEMO
618 North Arden 4341-005-009 3D SD 5D3
619 North Arden 4341-008-023 L.G. McNeU ResIdence 38 5 58
620 North Arden 4341-005-010 3D 5D 5D3
621 North Arden 4341-008-022 3D SD 5D3
622 North Arden 4341-005-011 3D 5D 5D3
624 North Arden 4341-005-012 3D 5D 5D3
625 North Arden 4341-008-020 3D SD 5D3
626 North Arden 4341-005-013 3D 5D 5D3
627 North Arden 4341-008-019 3D SD 5D3
628 North Arden 4341-005-014 3D 5D 5D3
629 North Arden 4341 -008-018 3D 5D 5D3
630 North Arden 4341-005-015 3D 5D DEMO
703 North Arden 4341-007-017 3D 5D 5D3
704 North Arden 4341-006-002 3D 5D 5D3
705 North Arden 4341-007-016 Rene RMerre ResIdence 38 5 58
706 North Arden 4341-006-003 3D 5D 5D3
707 North Arden 4341-007-015 Agnes Morrison Residence 3D 5 5B
708 North Arden 4341-006-004 3D 5D 5D3
Page 3 of 15
-H - ‘-~ -~
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
709 North Arden 4341-007-014 3D 5D 5D3
Arden Drive Contractors Arden Drive Contractors Grouping 3S 5S 5S3
910 North Bedford 4345-004-011 Earle C. Anthony/N. Kerry Residence 3S 3 3S
300 South Bedford 4328-023-028 3D 5D 3D
301 South Bedford 4328-018-001 3D 5D 3D
304 South Bedford 4328-023-027 3D 5D 3D
305 South Bedford 4328-018-002 3D 5D 6L
308 South Bedford 4328-023-026 3D 5D 6L
309 South Bedford 4328-018-003 3D 5D 3D
312 South Bedford 4328-023-025 3D 5D 6L
315 South Bedford 4328-018-004 3D 5D 3D
316 South Bedford 4328-023-024 3D 5D 3D
317 South Bedford 4328-018-005 3D 5D 3D
320 South Bedford 4328-023-023 3D 5D 3D
321 South Bedford 4328-018-006 3D 5D 3D
328 South Bedford 4328-023-021 3D 5D 3D
329 South Bedford 4328-018-008 3D SD 3D
332 South Bedford 4328-023-020 3D 5D 3D
333 South Bedford 4328-018-009 3D 5D 3D
336 South Bedford 4328-023-019 3D 5D 6L
337 South Bedford 4328-018-010 3D SD 3D/5S3
340 South Bedford 4328-023-018 3D 5D DEMO
341 South Bedford 4328-018-011 3D SD 3D
917 Benedict Canon 4345-005-009 Charlotte Pickford Residence 5S S 5S3
1220 Benedict Canon 4348-018-027 Charles B. Hopper Estate 5S S 7R
1230 Benedict Canon 4348-018-021 Howard Hawks Estate 45 4 7R
1030 Benedict Canyon 4348-012-022 Corrine Griffith Estate 3S 5 7R
— _ _ — — — — _I
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
206 North Beverly 4343-013-010 Beverly Theater 5S 5 5S3
357 North Beverly 4343-015-021 Karl M. Schurz Building 5S 5 5S3
370 North Beverly 4343-012-001 W.D. Longyear Building 3S 3 3S
522 North Beverly 4344-021-010 Dan Blair Residence 5D 5D 5D3
610 North Beverly 4344-019-014 Wheeler Oakman Residence 3S 3 DEMO
613 North Beverly 4344-023-020 William T. Sterling Residence 3D 5D 5D3
616 North Beverly 4344-019-007 Herb Nacio Brown Residence 3S 3 DEMO
618 North Beverly 4344-019-009 Edward M. Smith Residence 3D 5D 5D3
621 North Beverly 4344-023-016 William B. Hunneweli Residence 4D 5D 5D3
710 North Beverly 4344-018-005 Elsie S. Talbott Residence 4D SD 5D3
714 North Beverly 4344-018-007 Unknown 4D 5D 5D3
718 North Beverly 4344-018-015 Charles B. Hopper Residence 3S 3 3S
908 North Beverly 4344-001-003 WIlliam Rohkam Residence 5S 5 DEMO
1011 North Beverly 4348-001-023 Milton Getz Estate 4S 4 7R
168 South Beverly 4331-001-036 Four Corners 4D 5D 5D3
195 South Beverly 4328-033-013 Four Corners 4D 5D 5D3
204 South Beverly 4331-003-031 Four Corners 4D 5D 5D3
205 South Beverly 4328-034-001 Four Corners 4D 5D 5D3
221 South Beverly 4328-034-004 Beverly Hills Transfer and Storage Co. 5S 5 6L
Beverly Gardens Park Beverly Gardens Park 2S1 2S1
Beverly Hills Churches Beverly Hills Churches Thematic Grouping 5S 5S 5S3
BH Neighborhood Theat BH Neighborhood Theatres Thematic Grouping 5S 5S 5S3
BH Schools Thematic G BH Schools Thematic Grouping 5S 5S 5S3
9525 Brighton 4343-018-010 Camden-Brighton Building 3S 3 3S
9601 Brighton 4343-022-007 Beverly Professional Building 35 3 3S
368 North Camden 4343-019-001 Beaumont Building 3S 3 3S
500 North Camden 4345-025-029 All Saints Episcopal Church 4D 5D 5D3~Y
PageS of 15
-~ — _ — — _ _ ~J -~
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
729 North Camden 4345-013-015 Milo Baker Residence 5S 5 5S3
810 North Camden 4345-011-008 Stanley H. ‘flail Residence 4D 5D 5D3
814 North Camden 4345-011-006 Annie H. Thompson Residence 5D 5D 5D3
901 North Camden 4345-004-008 Charles Ray Residence 5S 5 5S3
905 North Camden 4345-004-009 William D. Foote Residence 5S 5 5S3
300 South Camden 4328-029-028 3D 5D 3D
301 South Camden 4328-024-001 3D 5D 3D
304 South Camden 4328-029-027 3D 5D 3D
308 South Camden 4328-029-026 3D 5D 3D
309 South Camden 4328-024-003 3D 5D 3D
312 South Camden 4328-029-025 3D 5D 3D
315 South Camden 4328-024-004 3D 5D 3D
316 South Camden 4328-029-024 3D 5D 3D
317 South Camden 4328-024-005 3D 5D 3D
320 South Camden 4328-029-033 3D 5D 3D
321 South Camden 4328-024-006 3D 5D 3D
324 South Camden 4328-029-022 3D 5D 3D
325 South Camden 4328-024-007 3D 5D 3D
328 South Camden 4328-029-021 3D 5D DEMO
332 South Camden 4328-029-020 3D 5D 7R
333 South Camden 4328-024-009 3D 5D 3D
336 South Camden 4328-029-019 3D 5D 3D
337 South Camden 4328-024-010 3D 5D 3D
340 South Camden 4328-029-018 3D 5D 3D
421 North Canon 4343-011-014 3S 5 DEMO
470 North Canon 4343-009-902 Beverly Hills Post Office IS 1 1 S
515 North Canon 4344-021-017 Artemus M. Clark Residence 3D 5D 6L
Page 6 of 15
_ _ — _ _ n_ _ _ _ I — _ I _ 1 _
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
517 North Canon 4344-021-016 Rodeo Land & Water Model Home 5D 50 5D3
520 North Canon 4344-007-008 W.S. Waith Residence 5S 5 5S3
601 North Canon 4344-020-014 Robert M. Kedzie Residence 5D 5D DEMO
607 North Canon 4344-020-011 Charles W. Farber Residence 5D 5D 5D3
609 North Canon 4344-020-010 5D 5D 5D3
711 North Canon 4344-018-010 Edward R. Wood Residence 50 50 503
1100 Carolyn 4348-005-006 Grayhall 203 3 3S
8701 Charleville Horace Mann School 4S 50 503
1700 Chevy Chase 4348-023-032 Beverly Hills Women’s Club 3S 3 3S
135 Copley 4345-035-003 Paul H. Helms Residence 3S 3D 7R
145 Copley 4345-035-004 Canle Guggenheim Residence 4S 3D 3D/5S3
Copley P1 - Greenway 0 Copley P1 - Greenway Dr Res Grouping 5S 3S 3S
1011 Cove 4348-010-010 5S 5 5S3
360 North Crescent 4343-002-030 MCAILltton Industries Buildings 3D 3D 3S
375 North Crescent 4343-007-025 MCAILitton Parking Garage 3D 3D 3S
450 North Crescent 4343-001-800 Beverly Hills City Hall 2S2 3 2S2
627 North Crescent 4344-088-016 50 50 6L
708 North Crescent 4344-003-004 James L. Woolevlne Residence 50 50 503
717 North Crescent 4344-019-011 Agnes E. Wood Residence 50 50 503
805 North Crescent 4344-010-005 Mary Jackson Residence 50 50 DEMO
916 North Crescent 4344-012-005 Oscar Lawler Residence 4S 5 7R
1000 North Crescent 4344-008-012 Harry Cohn Residence 3S 3 3S
1006 North Crescent 4344-008-011 CarolIne Spaldlng Residence 3S 3 3S
301 South El Camino 4328-030-001 3D 50 3D
304 South El Camino 4328-035-027 30 50 3D
305 South El Camino 4328-030-002 3D 50 30
308 South El Camlno 4328-035-026 30 50 3D
Page 7of15
L_ 1 1 r 1 r-— -~
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
309 South El Camino 4328-030-003 3D 5D 3D
312 South El Camino 4328-035-025 3D 5D 3D
313 South El Camino 4328-030-004 3D 5D 3D
316 South El Camino 4328-035-024 3D SD 3D
320 South El Camino 4328-035-023 3D 5D 3D
321 South El Camino 4328-030-006 3D 5D 3D
325 South El Camino 4328-030-007 3D 5D 3D
332 South El Camino 4328-035-020 3D 5D 3D
333 South El Camino 4328-030-009 3D 5D 3D
336 South El Camino 4238-035-019 3D 5D 3D
340 South El Camino 4328-035-018 3D 5D 3D
341 South El Camino 4328-030-011 3D 5D 3D
344 South El Camino 4328-035-017 3D 5D 3D
345 South El Camino 4328-030-012 3D 5D 3D
1008 Elden Harry and Virginia Robinson Estate IS I iS
200 South Elm Beverly Vista School 252 5D 3S/5B
720 Foothill 4341-020-009 3S 3 3S
336 North Foothill 4342-009-010 Payne Furnace and Supply Co. Plant 3S 3 3S
Four Comers Grouping Four Corners Grouping 4S 5S 5S3
1740 Greenacres 4348-019-027 Harold Lloyd Estate IS i 7R
826 Greenway 4345-034-010 5B 3D 3D
832 Greenway 4345-034-011 John Rigby Residence 3S 3D 38
836 Greenway 4345-034-012 F.E. Gloyd Residence 4S 3D 3D
841 Greenway 4345-035-008 James M. Holt ResIdence 7 3D 3D
809 North Hillcrest 4350-003-020 4S 4 7R
333 South La Clenega La Clenega Wtr TrtmntlAcad. of MPA&S 3S 3 3S
1261 Lago Vista 4350-018-023 Harold M. English Residence 5S 5 5S3
Page 8 of15
I___ ~ ____ Ii ___ ____
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
153 South Lasky 4328-003-015 5S 5 5S3
1200 Laurel 4348-001-012 4S 4 7R
1601 Lexington 4348-009-016 Burton E. Green Residence 4S 4 7R
1640 Lexington 4348-001-001 Irving W. Heliman Estate Carnage Hse 5S 3 3S
1700 Lexington 4348-002-003 T.A. Tooey Estate 3S 5 3S
148 South Linden 4328-014-003 Church of the Good Shepherd School 4S 5D 5D3
300 South Linden 4328-012-027 3D 5D 3D
301 South Linden 4328-011-001 3D SD DEMO
305 South Linden 4328-011-002 3D SD 3D
309 South Linden 4328-011-003 3D 5D 3D
312 South Linden 4328-012-024 3D 5D 3D
31S South Linden 4328-011-004 3D 5D 3D
316 South Linden 4328-012-023 3D SD 3D
317 South Linden 4328-011-005 3D SD DEMO
320 South Linden 4328-012-022 3D SD 3D
321 South Linden 4328-011-006 3D 5D 3D
328 South Linden 4328-012-020 3D 5D 3D/SS3
329 South Linden 4328-011-008 3D 5D 3D
332 South Linden 4328-012-019 3D SD 3D
333 South Linden 4328-011-009 3D 5D 3D
336 South Linden 4328-012-018 3D 5D 3D
337 South Linden 4328-011-010 3D SD 3D
340 South Linden 4328-012-017 3D SD 3D
341 South Linden 4328-011-011 3D SD DEMO
905 Loma Vista 4350-005-903 Greystone Park IS 1 IS
419 North Maple 4342-007-004 Beverly Hills Mortuary 3S 3 DEMO
300 South McCarty 4328-017-028 3D SD 3D
Page 9 of 15
T~
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
301 South McCarty 4328-012-001 3D 5D 3D
304 South McCarty 4328-017-027 3D 5D 3D
305 South McCarty 4328-012-002 3D 5D 3D
308 South McCarty 4328-017-026 3D 5D 6L
309 South McCarty 4328-012-003 3D 5D 3D
312 South McCarty 4328-017-025 3D 5D 3D
315 South McCarty 4328-012-004 3D 5D 3D
316 South McCarty 4328-017-024 3D 5D 3D
317 South McCarty 4328-012-005 3D 5D 3D
320 South McCarty 4328-017-023 3D 5D 3D
321 South McCarty 4328-012-006 3D 5D 6L
324 South McCarty 4328-017-022 3D 5D 3D
325 South McCarty 4328-012-007 3D 5D 3D
328 South McCarty 4328-017-021 3D 5D 3D
329 South McCarty 4328-012-008 3D 5D 3D
332 South McCarty 4328-017-020 3D 5D DEMO
333 South McCarty 4328-012-009 3D 5D 6L
336 South McCarty 4328-017-019 3D 5D 3D
337 South McCarty 4328-012-010 3D 5D 3D
340 South McCarty 4328-017-018 3D 5D 3D
341 South McCarty 4328-012-011 3D 5D 3D
241 South Morerio 4319-001-900 6Y2 SD 5D3
1018 Pamela 4348-010-011 Buster Keaton Estate 3S 3 7R
1305 Park 4344-021-003 ElIzabeth Hopper ResIdence 3S 4 5S3
300 South Peck 4328-024-028 3D 5D 3D
301 South Peck 4328-023-001 3D SD 3D
304 South Peck 4328-024-027 3D 5D 3D
Page IOofI5
~-_--___i ______J S.— ~-__ — —~ ~ —i _______J -___.__._J
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
305 South Peck 4328-023-002 3D 5D 3D
308 South Peck 4328-024-026 3D 5D 3D
309 South Peck 4328-023-003 3D 5D 3D
312 South Peck 4328-024-025 3D 5D 3D
313 South Peck 4328-023-004 3D 5D 3D
316 South Peck 4328-024-024 3D 5D 3D
317 South Peck 4328-023-005 3D 50 3D
320 South Peck 4328-024-023 3D 5D 3D
324 South Peck 4328-024-022 3D 5D 3D
325 South Peck 4328-023-007 3D 5D 3D
328 South Peck 4328-024-021 3D 5D 3D
329 South Peck 4328-023-008 3D 5D 3D
332 South Peck 4328-024-020 3D 3D
333 South Peck 4328-023-009 3D 5D 3D/5S3
336 South Peck 4328-024-019 3D 5D 3D
337 South Peck 4328-023-010 3D 5D 3D
340 South Peck 4328-024-018 3D 5D 3D
Pre-1920 Residences T Pre-1920 Residences Thematic Grouping 5S 5S 5S3
624 North Rexford Hawthorne Grammar School 2D2 5D 2D2/5S3
803 North Rexford 4344-002-012 Fred Cox Residence 3S 3 3S
906 North Rexford 4350-009-010 Bryant Washburn Residence 5S 5 5S3
927 North Rexford 4344-001-018 C.P. Butler Residence 5S 5 6L
140 South Rexford First Church of Christ Scientist 40 5D 503
1026 Ridgedale 4348-021-014 Frederic March Residence 3S 3 7R
1028 Ridgedale 4348-021-015 R.A. Pratt Residence 3S 3 7R
302 North Rodeo 4343-015-011 Eddie Schmidt Building 5S 5 5S3
332 North Rodeo 4343-015-006 Anderton Court 7J 4 IS
Page 11 of 15
—- — ___ -—
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
501 North Rodeo 4345-025-028 Beverly Hills Community Church 5D 5D 5D3
507 North Rodeo 4345-025-003 Don O’Neill Residence 5S 4 3CS
801 North Rodeo 4345-011-001 Edmund Locke Residence 3S 3 3S
803 North Rodeo 4345-011-002 EudoraThorkildsen Residence 3S 3 DEMO
808 North Rodeo 4344-026-004 Tod Browning Residence 4S 5 5S3
300 South Rodeo 4328-030-028 3D 50 3D
301 South Rodeo 4328-029-001 3D 50 3D
304 South Rodeo 4328-030-027 3D SD 3D
305 South Rodeo 4328-029-002 3D 50 3D
308 South Rodeo 4328-003-026 3D 50 3D
312 South Rodeo 4328-030-025 3D SD 3D
315 South Rodeo 4328-029-004 3D SD 7R
316 South Rodeo 4328-030-024 3D SD 3D
317 South Rodeo 4328-029-005 3D SD 3D
320 South Rodeo 4328-030-023 3D 50 3D
321 South Rodeo 4328-029-006 3D 5D 3D
325 South Rodeo 4328-029-007 3D 5D 3D
328 South Rodeo 4328-030-021 3D SD 3D
329 South Rodeo 4328-029-008 3D SD 3D
332 South Rodeo 4328-030-020 3D SD IS
336 South Rodeo 4328-030-019 3D 50 3D
340 South Rodeo 4328-030-018 3D 5D 3D
345 South Rodeo 4328-029-012 3D 50 3D
801 North Roxbury 4345-008-001 None. 3S 3 3S
822 North Roxbury 4345-009-010 Marlene Dietrich Residence 3S 4 3S
902 North Roxbury 4345-005-022 6 S DEMO
300 South Roxbury 4328-018-028 3D SD 3D~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Page 12 of15
~~L__L~
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
301 South Roxbury 4328-017-001 3D 5D 3D
304 South Roxbury 4328-018-027 3D 5D 3D
305 South Roxbury 4328-017-002 3D 5D 3D
308 South Roxbury 4328-018-026 3D 5D 3D
309 South Roxbury 4328-017-003 3D 5D 3D
312 South Roxbury 4328-018-025 3D 5D DEMO
313 South Roxbury 4328-017-004 3D 5D 3D
316 South Roxbury 4328-018-024 3D 5D 3D
317 South Roxbury 4328-017-005 3D 5D 3D
320 South Roxbury 4328-018-023 3D 5D 6L
321 South Roxbury 4328-017-006 3D 5D 6L
324 South Roxbury 4328-018-022 3D 5D 3D
325 South Roxbury 4328-017-007 3D 5D 3D
328 South Roxbury 4328-018-021 3D 5D 3D
329 South Roxbury 4328-017-008 3D 5D 3D
333 South Roxbury 4328-017-009 3D 5D 3D
336 South Roxbury 4328-018-019 3D 5D 3D
337 South Roxbury 4328-017-010 3D 5D 3D
340 South Roxbury 4328-018-018 3D SD 3D
341 South Roxbury 4328-017-011 3D 5D 3D
440 South Roxbury 4330-011-012 MIriam Wosk Penthouse 3D 5 5S3
1103 San Ysidro 4348-016-017 Richard B. Fudger Residence 3S 3 7R
9376 Santa Monica 4343-008-012 Union 76 Station 4S 4 3S
9441 Santa Monica 4343-010-004 Chamber of Commerce Building 5S 5 5S3
9501 Santa Monica 4343-017-001 Writers and Artists Building 5S 5 5S3
1130 Schuyler 4350-005-007 5S 5 7R
436 South Spalding 4330-009-017 Jacob Karasik House 5S 5 5S3
Page 13 of 15
— — — — —
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
1050 Summit 4348-011-015 David 0. Seiznlck Residence 3S 3 3S
1085 Summit 4348-012-005 Charles Chaplain Estate 4S 4 7R
1143 Summit 4348-013-024 Pickfalr 3S 3 6Z
9401 Sunset 4350-002-005 4S 4 7R
9419 Sunset 4350-002-006 5S 4 7R
9439 Sunset 4350-002-009 4S 4 7R
9481 Sunset 4350-004-008 3S 3 7R
9641 Sunset 4344-016-002 Beverly Hills Hotel 2S2 3 2S2
9900 Sunset 4345-035-009 Benjamin Beckman Residence 5B 3D 7R
1143 Tower 4348-015-018 Stanley Imemian Residence 5S 5 5S3
1146 Tower 4348-016-027 George KoIb Estate 3S 3 6L
1162 Tower 4348-015-021 AlbertScottResidence 5S 5 7R
9930 Tower 4348-018-022 J.R. Plnkham Residence 3S 3 7R
Tract 7110 Residential Tract 7110 Residential Grouping 3S 5S 3S
516 Walden 4345-030-010 Wiliat Studio Production Office 3S 3 7R
605 Whittier El Rodeo School 2S2 5D 2S2/5B
Will Rogers Park Will Rogers Park 3S 3S
8423 Wilshire 4334-022-060 Clock Market 5S 5 5S3
8444 Wilshire 4333-029-018 Fox Wilshire Theatre 4S 4 3S/5B
8554 Wilshire 4333-018-030 Regina Wilshire Theatre 3S 5D 3S/5B
8810 Wilshire 4333-008-002 ColumbIa Savings 5S 5 5S3
9036 Wilshire 4331-023-005 Elite Theatre 5S 5D 5B
9400 Wilshire 4331-001-002 WamerBrothersTheatre 3S 3 DEMO
9429 Wilshire 4343-013-011 California Bank Building 4S 4 3CS
9528 Wilshire 4328-032-011 Beverly Wilshire Hotel IS 3 IS
9536 Wilshire 4328-027-016 W. & J. Sloan, J.J. Haggarty 3S 5D 5D3
9600 Wilshire 4328-021-001 Saks Fifth Avenue 3S 5D 3S/5B
Page 14 of 15
L~ ~ __ ~.
2004 OHPAddress Direction Street Parcel No Resource Name NR Status City Status Updated Status
9634 Wilshire 4328-020-001 I. Magnln & Co. 4S 5D 3S15B
Wilshire BI Specialty St Wilshire BI SpecIalty Stores Thematic Grping 5S 5S 5S3
Page 15 of 15
,~— •~ :~
Area 4 MFR SurveyAddress Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRFIP Status Code Other Identifier
132 South Bedford 4328-021-016 1930 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
133 South Bedford 4328-020-005 1936 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
136 South Bedford 4328-021-015 1949 6L
137 South Bedford 4328-020-020 1924 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
140 South Bedford 4328-021-014 1935 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
141 South Bedford 4328-020-008 1937 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
144 South Bedford 4328-021-013 1954 6L
145 South Bedford 4328-020-009 1935 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
148 South Bedford 4328-021-012 1929 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
149 South Bedford 4328-020-010 1936 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
153 South Bedford 4328-020-011 1938 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
401 South Bedford 4330-011-001 1934 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
418 South Bedford 4330-015-006 1936 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
419 South Bedford 4330-011-044 1929 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
422 South Bedford 4330-015-007 1929 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
423 South Bedford 4330-011-052 1930 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
426 South Bedford 4330-015-008 1929 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
427 South Bedford 4330-011-041 1930 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
430 South Bedford 4330-015-009 1929 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
431 South Bedford 4330-011-040 1930 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
434 South Bedford 4330-015-010 1929 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
435 South Bedford 4330-011-039 1933 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
438 South Bedford 4330-015-011 1929 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
439 South Bedford 4330-011-038 1929 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
442 South Bedford 4330-015-012 1929 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
443 South Bedford 4330-011-037 1929 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
446 South Bedford 4330-015-013 1929 503 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
447 South Bedford 4330-011-036 1929 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
450 South Bedford 4330-015-014 1929 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
454 South Bedford 4330-015-015 1929 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
Page 1 of20
.~ :~ L~ LJ LJ L~J L~ ~i
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NPJIP Status Code Other Identifier458 South Bedford 4330-015-016 1938 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
459 South Bedford 4330-011-032 1935 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
462 South Bedford 4330-015-017 1930 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
463 South Bedford 4330-011-031 1927 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
467 South Bedford 4330-011-030 1938 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
471 South Bedford 4330-011-029 1935 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
474 South Bedford 4330-015-020 1928 6L
475 South Bedford 4330-011-048 1935 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
478 South Bedford 4330-015-043 1931 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR Dis 5S3 Beverly Vista MFR District Primary Record
124 South Camden 4328-027-008 1925 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
128 South Camden 4328-027-015 1931 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
136 South Camden 4328-027-007 1953 6L
137 South Camden 4328-026-009 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
140 South Camden 4328-027-006 1931 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
141 South Camden 4328-026-010 1957 6L
144 South Camden 4328-027-014 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
145 South Camden 4328-026-017 1938 7R
148 South Camden 4328-027-013 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
149 South Camden 4328-026-018 1953 6Z
152 South Camden 4328-027-012 1933 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
153 South Camden 4328-026-019 1937 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
401 South Camden 4330-016-001 1953 6Z
120 South Canon 4331-008-045 1959 6L
124 South Canon 4331-008-044 1949 6L
128 South Canon 4331-008-043 1932 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
129 South Canon 4331-001-005 1932 6Z
132 South Canon 4331-008-042 1932 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
133 South Canon 4331-001-006 1936 6L
136 South Canon 4331-008-041 1937 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
137 South Canon 4331-001-007 1930 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
140 South Canon 4331-008-040 1937 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
Page2of2O
L4 ;~ ~LJ ~ ~ ~J _j ~
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier225 South Crescent 4331-007-007 1927 6L
200 South Doheny 4331-024-034 1946 6Z
201 South Doheny 4331-022-001 1937 5S3
205 South Doheny 4331-022-002 1936 6Z
210 South Doheny 4331-024-033 1932 6L
212 South Doheny 4331 -024-032 1936 6L
213 South Doheny 4331-022-004 1957 6Z
216 South Doheny 4331-024-031 1939 6L
217 South Doheny 4331 -022-005 1957 6Z
220 South Doheny 4331 -024-030 1955 6L
221 South Doheny 4331-022-006 1959 6Z
228 South Doheny 4331-024-029 1954 6Z
229 South Doheny 4331 -022-007 1935 6L
232 South Doheny 4331 -024-028 1926 6L
233 South Doheny 4331-022-008 1935 6L
237 South Doheny 4331-022-009 1926 6L
240 South Doheny 4331-024-027 1960 6Z
241 South Doheny 4331-022-010 1930 6L
244 South Doheny 4331 -024-026 1953 6Z
249 South Doheny 4331-022-012 1940 6Z
252 South Doheny 4331-024-024 1957 6Z
256 South Doheny 4331-024-023 1956 6L
257 South Doheny 4331-022-014 1930 6L
260 South Doheny 4331 -024-022 1954 6Z
264 South Doheny 4331-024-021 1955 6Z
269 South Doheny 4331-022-017 1952 6L
272 South Doheny 4331-024-020 1952 6Z
273 South Doheny 4331-022-018 1937 6Z
300 South Doheny 4331-025-034 1946 6Z
301 South Doheny 4331-021-001 1926 6L
304 South Doheny 4331-025-033 1955 6L
305 South Doheny 4331-021-002 1936 6L
Page4of2O
~• ~ ~ ~••~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRFIP Status Code Other Identifier308 South Doheny 4331-025-032 1956 6Z
312 South Doheny 4331-025-031 1956 6Z
313 South Doheny 4331-021-004 1954 6Z
316 South Doheny 4331-025-030 1954 6Z
317 South Doheny 4331-021-005 1955 6Z
320 South Doheny 4331-025-029 1954 6Z
325 South Doheny 4331-021-006 1958 6Z
328 South Doheny 4331-025-027 1954 6Z
333 South Doheny 4331-021-008 1954 6Z
336 South Doheny 4331-025-025 1954 6L
337 South Doheny 4331-021-009 1956 6Z
340 South Doheny 4331 -025-024 1926 6L
341 South Doheny 4331-021-010 1954 6Z
345 South Doheny 4331-021-011 1958 6Z
348 South Doheny 4331-025-022 1940 6L
352 South Doheny 4331-025-021 1957 6Z
353 South Doheny 4331-021-012 1935 6L
356 South Doheny 4331-025-020 1936 6L
357 South Doheny 4331-021-013 1936 6L
360 South Doheny 4331-025-019 1941 6Z
361 South Doheny 4331-021-014 1938 6L
365 South Doheny 4331-021-015 1959 6L
369 South Doheny 4331-021-016 1949 6L
421 South Doheny 4332-004-005 1949 6Z
424 South Doheny 4332-006-025 1936 6L
433 South Doheny 4332-004-008 1949 6L
440 South Doheny 4332-006-021 1936 6L
441 South Doheny 4332-004-010 1949 6L
448 South Doheny 4332-006-019 1936 6L
449 South Doheny 4332-004-012 1946 6L
9900 Durant 4328-004-016 1939 6L
9901 Durant 4328-002-016 1935 6L
Page 5of20
L~ L ~J •_J ~
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier9904 Durant 4328-004-015 1937 6L
9909 Durant 4328-002-017 1941 6L
9912 Durant 4328-004-014 1937 6L
9913 Durant 4328-002-018 1941 6L
9916 Durant 4328-004-013 1937 6L
9917 Durant 4328-002-019 1937 6L
9920 Durant 4328-004-012 1936 5S3
9924 Durant 4328-004-011 1936 6L
9925 Durant 4328-002-021 1937 6L
9928 Durant 4328-004-010 1960 6Z
9929 Durant 4328-002-022 1936 6Z
9932 Durant 4328-004-009 1941 6L
9933 Durant 4328-002-023 1938 6L
9936 Durant 4328-004-008 1935 6L
9937 Durant 4328-002-024 1938 6L
9941 Durant 4328-002-025 1937 6L
9945 Durant 4328-002-026 1940 6Z
9958 Durant 4328-004-004 1937 6L
9961 Durant 4328-002-028 1935 6L
9962 Durant 4328-004-003 1937 6L
9965 Durant 4328-002-029 1936 6L
9966 Durant 4328-004-002 1935 6L
9969 Durant 4328-002-030 1935 6L
9970 Durant 4328-004-001 1936 6L
9973 Durant 4328-002-031 1954 6Z
201 South El Camino 4328-031-001 1935 5S3
204 South El Camino 4328-034-030 1934 6L
205 South El Camino 4328-031-002 1936 6L
208 South El Camino 4328-034-029 1936 6L
209 South El Camino 4328-031-003 1929 6L
120 South Elm 4331-013-041 1926 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
121 South Elm 4331-008-003 1928 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
Page 6 of20
ri —
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier124 South Elm 4331-013-040 1948 6L
133 South Elm 4331-008-006 1928 6Z
137 South Elm 4331-008-007 1928 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
140 South Elm 4331-013-036 1927 6Z
141 South Elm 4331-008-008 1931 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
144 South Elm 4331-013-035 1930 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
145 South Elm 4331-008-009 1928 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
148 South Elm 4331-013-034 1927 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
149 South Elm 4331-008-010 1940 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
152 South Elm 4331-013-033 1938 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
156 South Elm 4331-013-032 1938 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
157 South Elm 4331-008-012 1958 6L
201 South Elm 4331-009-001 1937 6L
205 South Elm 4331-009-002 1960 6L
209 South Elm 4331-009-003 1948 6L
213 South Elm 4331-009-004 1932 6L
221 South Elm 4331-009-006 1948 6L
225 South Elm 4331-009-007 1940 6L
229 South Elm 4331-009-008 1929 6L
233 South Elm 4331-009-009 1938 6L
237 South Elm 4331-009-010 1930 6L
241 South Elm 4331 -009-038 1936 6L
245 South Elm 4331-009-013 1936 6Z
249 South Elm 4331-009-014 1940 6L
253 South Elm 4331-009-015 1936 6L
257 South Elm 4331-009-016 1928 6Z
301 South Elm 4331-010-001 1933 6L
305 South Elm 4331-010-002 1932 6L
309 South Elm 4331-010-003 1957 6Z
312 South Elm 4331-011-031 1957 6L
313 South Elm 4331-010-004 1957 6Z
317 South Elm 4331-010-005 1959 6L
Page 7of20
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier320 South Elm 4331-011-030 1957 6Z
321 South Elm 4331-010-006 1926 6Z
325 South Elm 4331-010-007 1937 6L
332 South Elm 4331-011-027 1957 6Z
336 South Elm 4331-011-026 1960 6L
341 South Elm 4331-010-011 1955 6Z
344 South Elm 4331-011-024 1955 6L
345 South Elm 4331-010-012 1959 6Z
348 South Elm 4331-011-023 1954 6L
352 South Elm 4331-011-022 1936 6L
356 South Elm 4331-011-021 1936 6L
357 South Elm 4331-010-013 1955 6L
360 South Elm 4331-011-020 1956 6L
361 South Elm 4331-010-014 1956 6Z
200 South Lasky 4328-007-020 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
203 South Lasky 4328-004-018 1930 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
204 South Lasky 4328-007-019 1940 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
208 South Lasky 4328-007-018 1926 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
212 South Lasky 4328-007-017 1938 6L
216 South Lasky 4328-007-016 1932 6Z
220 South Lasky 4328-007-015 1931 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
224 South Lasky 4328-007-014 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
228 South Lasky 4328-007-013 1928 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
232 South Lasky 4328-007-012 1925 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
236 South Lasky 4328-007-011 1933 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
240 South Lasky 4328-006-022 1928 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
244 South Lasky 4328-006-021 1939 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
248 South Lasky 4328-006-020 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
252 South Lasky 4328-006-019 1930 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
256 South Lasky 4328-006-018 1939 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
125 South Unden 4328-009-021 1959 6L
133 South Linden 4328-009-008 1935 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
Page 8 of20
I______ ______ ______ ______ —~ — —
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier136 South Linden 4328-014-Ô17 1952 6Z
153 South Linden 4328-009-010 1941 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
349 South Linden 4328-011-041 1952 6Z
124 South Maple 4331-018-044 1929 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
148 South Maple 4331-018-038 1937 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
149 South Maple 4331-013-011 1926 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
152 South Maple 4331-018-037 1931 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
153 South Maple 4331-013-012 1926 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
157 South Maple 4331-013-013 1934 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
422 South Maple 4332-001-027 1954 6L
423 South Maple 4330-034-004 1957 6L
427 South Maple 4330-034-005 1936 6L
431 South Maple 4330-034-006 1934 6L
438 South Maple 4332-001-023 1931 6L
439 South Maple 4330-034-008 1937 6L
442 South Maple 4332-001-022 1938 6L
443 South Maple 4330-034-009 1929 6L
446 South Maple 4332-001-021 1953 6L
447 South Maple 4330-034-010 1937 6L
455 South Maple 4330-034-012 1954 6L
459 South Maple 4330-034-030 1935 6L
132 South McCarty 4328-015-018 1938 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
136 South McCarty 4328-015-017 1940 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
145 South McCarty 4328-014-001 1951 6L
148 South McCarty 4328-015-004 1947 6L
350 South McCarty 4328-017-016 1955 5S3
355 South McCarty 4328-012-013 1936 5S3
128 South Oakhurst 4331-023-037 1928 6L
129 South Oakhurst 4331-018-007 1930 6L
132 South Oakhurst 4331-023-036 1932 6L
136 South Oakhurst 4331-023-035 1929 6L
149 South Oakhurst 4331-018-012 1930 6L
Page 9of20
— — — ~— -~ -~ —~ -~
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier427 South Oakhurst 4332-003-006 1930 6L
430 South Oakhurst 4332-004-023 1926 6L
434 South Oakhurst 4332-004-022 1957 6Z
438 South Oakhurst 4332-004-021 1955 6Z
442 South Oakhurst 4332-004-020 1954 6L
446 South Oakhurst 4332-004-019 1947 6L
450 South Oakhurst 4332-004-018 1928 6Z
451 South Oakhurst 4332-003-011 1953 6L
9248 Olympic 4330-034-028 1935 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9300 Olympic 4330-033-003 1950 6L
9301 Olympic 4331-011-015 1948 6L
9306 Olympic 4330-033-002 1950 6L
9307 Olympic 4331 -011-016 1937 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9313 Olympic 4331-011-017 1935 6L
9318 Olympic 4330-003-029 1935 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9319 Olympic 4331-011-019 1937 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9330 Olympic 4330-030-003 1934 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9331 Olympic 4331-010-015 1935 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9336 Olympic 4330-030-002 1936 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9337 Olympic 4331-010-016 1946 6Z
9342 Olympic 4330-030-001 1936 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9343 Olympic 4331-010-017 1938 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9348 Olympic 4330-030-029 1937 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9349 Olympic 4331-010-019 1936 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9354 Olympic 4330-030-028 1937 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9355 Olympic 4331 -010-018 1937 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9360 Olympic 4330-029-003 1931 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9366 Olympic 4330-029-002 1936 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9367 Olympic 4331-006-018 1934 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9372 Olympic 4330-029-001 1936 503 OlympIc Blvd MFR District
9373 Olympic 4331-006-019 1937 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9378 Olympic 4330-029-027 1936 6L
Page 10 of2O
— __
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Ident~fler9379 Olympic 4331-006-020 1930 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9384 Olympic 4330-029-026 1935 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9400 Olympic 4330-028-007 1948 3CS
9401 Olympic 4331-005-017 1948 6L
9407 Olympic 4331-005-018 1941 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9415 Olympic 4331-005-019 1933 6Z
9419 Olympic 4331-005-021 1941 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9425 Olympic 4331-005-020 1941 6L
9500 Olympic 4330-022-027 1948 6L
9514 Olympic 4330-022-026 1960 6Z
9517 Olympic 4328-030-015 1940 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9528 Olympic 4330-022-005 1935 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9544 Olympic 4330-021-002 1936 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9545 Olympic 4328-029-014 1936 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9550 Olympic 4330-021-003 1951 6L
9553 Olympic 4328-029-015 1936 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9556 Olympic 4330-021-004 1936 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9561 Olympic 4328-029-016 1955 6Z
9562 Olympic 4330-021-005 1950 6L
9576 Olympic 4330-016-002 1935 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9579 Olympic 4328-024-014 1935 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9582 Olympic 4330-016-003 1947 6L
9588 Olympic 4330-016-004 1952 6Z
9594 Olympic 4330-016-005 1941 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9595 Olympic 4328-024-016 1949 6L
9600 Olympic 4330-015-001 1940 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9608 Olympic 4330-015-002 1949 6L
9609 Olympic 4328-023-014 1941 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9614 Olympic 4330-015-003 1940 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9619 Olympic 4328-023-015 1940 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9620 Olympic 4330-015-004 1936 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9626 Olympic 4330-015-005 1939 6L
Page 11 of20
..“— ~ ~ ~—
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier9633 Olympic 4328-018-013 1947 6L
9641 Olympic 4328-018-014 1940 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9642 Olympic 4330-011-002 1937 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9648 Olympic 4330-011-050 1937 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9649 Olympic 4328-018-015 1947 6L
9654 Olympic 4330-011-005 1935 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9657 Olympic 4328-018-016 1936 5B Olympic Blvd MFR District
9660 Olympic 4330-011-006 1935 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9667 Olympic 4328-017-013 1947 6L
9675 Olympic 4328-017-014 1953 6Z
9683 Olympic 4328-017-015 1936 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9725 Olympic 4328-012-015 1950 6L
9741 Olympic 4328-011-014 1937 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9749 Olympic 4328-011-015 1936 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9750 Olympic 4330-009-001 1939 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9800 Olympic 4330-001-001 1939 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9830 Olympic 4330-001-002 1937 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9840 Olympic 4330-001-003 1937 5D3 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9850 Olympic 4330-001-004 1938 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
9860 Olympic 4330-001-005 1938 503 Olympic Blvd MFR District
Olympic Blvd MFR Dis 5S3 Olympic Boulevard MFR District Primary Recor
128 South Palm 4331-018-020 1937 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
132 South Palm 4331-018-019 1929 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
133 South Palm 4331-018-029 1929 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
144 South Palm 4331-018-016 1927 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
148 South Palm 4331-018-015 1930 5B Beverly Vista MFR District
149 South Palm 4331-018-033 1937 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
430 South Palm 4332-003-025 1939 6L
434 South Palm 4332-003-024 1929 6L
435 South Palm 4332-001-008 1958 6L
454 South Palm 4332-003-018 1926 6L
459 South Palm 4332-001-014 1928 6Z
:~_ ~
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRIIP Status Code Other Identifier462 South Palm 4332-003-016 1935 6L
133 South Peck 4328-021-005 1931 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
136 South Peck 4328-026-012 1938 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
137 South Peck 4328-021-026 1937 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
140 South Peck 4328-026-011 1938 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
141 South Peck 4328-021-007 1926 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
144 South Peck 4328-026-022 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
145 South Peck 4328-021-008 1940 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
149 South Peck 4328-021-009 1940 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
152 South Peck 4328-026-020 1928 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
353 South Peck 4328-023-013 1937 6L
120 South Reeves 4331-001-022 1926 6Z
124 South Reeves 4331-001-021 1933 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
128 South Reeves 4331-001-020 1940 6L
132 South Reeves 4331 -001-019 1930 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
133 South Reeves 4331-001-030 1937 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
136 South Reeves 4331-001-018 1940 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
140 South Reeves 4331-001-017 1941 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
145 South Reeves 4331-001-032 1937 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
149 South Reeves 4331-001-033 1926 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
152 South Reeves 4331 -001-014 1937 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
153 South Reeves 4331-001-034 1957 6L
156 South Reeves 4331.001-013 1936 503 Beverly Vista MFR District
204 South Reeves 4331-002-037 1940 6L
205 South Reeves 4331-003-002 1935 6L
208 South Reeves 4331-002-036 1938 6L
209 South Reeves 4331-003-003 1940 6L
212 South Reeves 4331-002-035 1941 6L
213 South Reeves 4331-003-004 1925 6L
216 South Reeves 4331-002-034 1940 6L
220 South Reeves 4331-002-033 1950 6L
224 South Reeves 4331-002-032 1935 3S/5B
~ fl~4’W~~Y< ‘U7~ ~
Page 13 of20
:.~ •.~ :~.
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRIIP Status Code Other Identifier228 South Reeves 4331-002-031 1941 6L
232 South Reeves 4331-002-030 1930 6L
236 South Reeves 4331 -002-029 1935 6L
240 South Reeves 4331-002-028 1959 6Z
244 South Reeves 4331 -002-027 1934 6L
248 South Reeves 4331 -002-026 1927 6L
256 South Reeves 4331 -002-023 1926 5S3
260 South Reeves 4331-002-022 1927 6L
264 South Reeves 4331-002-021 1930 6L
268 South Reeves 4331 -002-020 1937 6L
300 South Reeves 4331-005-037 1928 6L
301 South Reeves 4331-004-001 1949 6L
304 South Reeves 4331-005-036 1940 6Z
305 South Reeves 4331 -004-002 1938 6L
308 South Reeves 4331-005-035 1939 6L
309 South Reeves 4331-004-003 1928 6L
312 South Reeves 4331-005-034 1953 6L
313 South Reeves 4331-004-004 1926 6L
316 South Reeves 4331-005-033 1929 6L
317 South Reeves 4331-004-005 1937 6L
320 South Reeves 4331 -005-032 1929 6Z
321 South Reeves 4331-004-006 1929 6L
325 South Reeves 4331 -004-007 1934 6L
329 South Reeves 4331 -004-008 1928 6Z
332 South Reeves 4331 -005-029 1934 6L
333 South Reeves 4331 -004-009 1959 6Z
336 South Reeves 4331-005-028 1928 6L
340 South Reeves 4331-005-027 1935 6L
344 South Reeves 4331-005-026 1939 6L
356 South Reeves 4331-005-023 1935 6L
360 South Reeves 4331-005-022 1954 6Z
121 South Rexford 4331-013-020 1930 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
Page 14 of20
—~ ~i :
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier137 South Rexford 4331-013-026 1926 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
141 South Rexford 4331 -01 3-047 1948 6Z
153 South Rexford 4331-013-030 1937 5D3 Beverly Vista MFR District
204 South Rexford 4331-014-036 1929 6L
208 South Rexford 4331-014-035 1931 6L
212 South Rexford 4331-014-034 1946 6L
220 South Rexford 4331-014-032 1940 6L
224 South Rexford 4331-014-031 1926 6L
228 South Rexford 4331 -014-030 1938 6L
232 South Rexford 4331-014-029 1929 6Z
236 South Rexford 4331-014-028 1946 6Z
240 South Rexford 4331-014-027 1953 6Z
244 South Rexford 4331-014-026 1960 6Z
252 South Rexford 4331-014-024 1949 6L
256 South Rexford 4331-014-023 1932 6L
260 South Rexford 4331-014-022 1926 6L
264 South Rexford 4331-014-039 1927 6L
305 South Rexford 4331-011-002 1954 6L
308 South Rexford 4331-015-031 1957 6L
309 South Rexford 4331-011-003 1936 6L
312 South Rexford 4331-015-030 1959 6L
316 South Rexford 4331-015-029 1957 6L
320 South Rexford 4331-015-028 1953 6L
321 South Rexford 4331-011-006 1936 6L
325 South Rexford 4331-011-007 1955 6Z
328 South Rexford 4331 -015-026 1956 5S3
329 South Rexford 4331-011-008 1960 6Z
332 South Rexford 4331-015-025 1957 6Z
333 South Rexford 4331-011-009 1955 6Z
336 South Rexford 4331-015-024 1956 6L
337 South Rexford 4331-011-010 1954 6L
341 South Rexford 4331-011-011 1956 6Z
Page 15 of20
1 r— _ I _ — . -~
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRFIP Status Code Other Identifier344 South Rexford 4331-015-022 1957 6Z
345 South Rexford 4331-011-012 1955 6Z
348 South Rexford 4331-015-021 1955 6L
352 South Rexford 4331-015-020 1953 6Z
353 South Rexford 4331-011-013 1937 6L
356 South Rexford 4331-015-019 1954 6Z
357 South Rexford 4331-011-014 1960 6Z
418 South Rexford 4330-034-026 1942 6L
419 South Rexford 4330-033-004 1954 6L
422 South Rexford 4330-034-025 1932 6Z
426 South Rexford 4330-034-024 1957 6Z
431 South Rexford 4330-033-007 1936 6Z
435 South Rexford 4330-033-008 1927 6L
438 South Rexford 4330-034-022 1938 6L
439 South Rexford 4330-033-009 1929 6L
442 South Rexford 4330-034-029 1960 6Z
443 South Rexford 4330-033-010 1929 6L
445 South Rexford 4330-033-011 1939 6L
450 South Rexford 4330-034-019 1956 6Z
451 South Rexford 4330-033-012 1926 DEMO
454 South Rexford 4330-034-018 1956 6L
455 South Rexford 4330-033-013 1927 6L
459 South Rexford 4330-033-014 1935 6L
463 South Rexford 4330-033-015 1960 6Z
9905 Robbins 4328-004-019 1931 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
9909 Robbins 4328-004-020 1936 6L
9915 Robbins 4328-004-021 1928 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
9920 Robbins 4328-005-012 1926 6Z
9921 Robbins 4328-004-023 1938 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
9924 Robbins 4328-005-011 1938 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
9925 Robbins 4328-004-024 1940 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
9928 Robbins 4328-005-010 1935 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
Page 16 of20
L. :*~E~ ~
.‘l .:~ _
Other IdentifierTract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Address Direction9929
9932
9933
9936
9939
9940
9944
9945
9948
9949
9952
9953
9956
9957
9961
9966
350 South
355 South
401 South
132 South
133 South
136 South
137 South
140 South
141 South
144 South
145 South
149 South
152 South
153 South
418 South
422 South
StreetRobbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Robbins
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Roxbury
Parcel No4328-004-025
4328-005-009
4328-004-026
4328-005-008
4328-004-027
4328-005-007
4328-005-006
4328-004-028
4328-005-005
4328-004-029
4328-005-004
4328-004-030
4328-005-003
4328-004-031
4328-004-033
4328-005-002
4328-030-016
4328-029-013
4330-021-001
4328-020-017
4328-015-013
4328-020-016
4328-015-014
4328-020-015
4328-015-015
4328-020-014
4328-015-001
4328-015-002
4328-020-012
4328-015-003
4330-011-007
4330-011-008
Date Constructed1929
1931
1948
1937
1926
1936
1931
1940
1928
1940
1933
1937
1936
1937
1936
1936
1949
1936
1952
1936
1942
1941
1931
1929
1930
1950
1948
1930
1936
1937
1929
1930
NPLHP Status Code5D3
5D3
6L
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5B
5D3
5D3
503
3S/5B
6L
5D3
58
6Z
5S3
6Z
5D3
6L
5D3
58
5D3
5D3
6L
5S3
5D3
5B
5D3
5D3
503
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
Page 17of20
.~ ::~-~ ~ ~ ~ —~ ~ ~ —s
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier426 South Roxbury 4330-011-009 1930 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
430 South Roxbury 4330-011-010 1937 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
434 South Roxbury 4330-011-011 1930 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
442 South Roxbury 4330-011-013 1937 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
446 South Roxbury 4330-011-014 1930 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
450 South Roxbury 4330-011-047 1930 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
454 South Roxbury 4330-011-018 1931 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
458 South Roxbury 4330-011-019 1938 5D3 South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
470 South Roxbury 4330-011-022 1950 6L
474 South Roxbury 4330-011-023 1951 6L
401 Shirley 4330-001-006 1941 6L
405 Shirley 4330-001-007 1948 6L
415 Shirley 4330-001-008 1946 6L
421 Shirley 4330-001-009 1948 6L
425 Shirley 4330-001-010 1939 6L
429 Shirley 4330-001-011 1939 6Z
433 Shirley 4330-001-012 1938 6L
437 Shirley 4330-001-013 1938 6L
422 Smithwood 4330-027-014 1937 5D3 Smithwood Drive MFR District
424 Smithwood 4330-027-015 1940 5D3 Smlthwood Drive MFR District
428 Smithwood 4330-027-016 1931 5D3 Smithwood Drive MFR District
432 Smithwood 4330-027-017 1931 5D3 Smithwood Drive MFR District
436 Smithwood 4330-027-018 1933 5D3 Smithwood Drive MFR District
440 Smithwood 4330-027-026 1930 5D3 Smithwood Drive MFR District
444 Smithwood 4330-027-020 1940 SB Smithwood Drive MFR District
448 Smithwood 4330-027-021 1947 6L
452 Smithwood 4330-027-022 1928 503 Smithwood Drive MFR District
456 Smithwood 4330-027-023 1929 503 Smithwood Drive MFR District
457 Smithwood 4330-024-032 1941 6L
460 Smithwood 4330-027-024 1935 5D3 Smithwood Drive MFR District
461 Smithwood 4330-024-040 1926 6Z
500 Smithwood 4330-026-032 1953 6L
~~~~ ~
Page 18 of20
- I~ ~ ~ ~•••••...~ ~__~ ~,___~
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other IdentifierSmithwood Dr MFR Di 5S3 Smithwood Drive MFR District Primary Record
South Roxbury-Bedfor 5S3 South Roxbury-Bedford Dr MFR Dist Primary R
125 South Spalding 4328-008-003 1958 6Z
132 South Spalding 4328-009-014 1937 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
133 South Spalding 4328-008-004 1948 6L
144 South Spalding 4328-009-013 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
149 South Spalding 4328-008-008 1948 6L
150 South Spalding 4328-009-012 1937 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
153 South Spalding 4328-008-009 1940 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
154 South Spalding 4328-009-011 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
200 South Spalding 4328-010-034 1939 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
204 South Spalding 4328-010-033 1930 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
208 South Spalding 4328-010-032 1936 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
212 South Spalding 4328-010-031 1939 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
216 South Spalding 4328-010-030 1935 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
220 South Spalding 4328-010-029 1938 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
224 South Spalding 4328-010-028 1929 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
228 South Spalding 4328-010-027 1934 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
232 South SpaTding 4328-010-026 1950 6L
233 South Spalding 4328-007-009 1939 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
236 South Spalding 4328-010-025 1956 6L
237 South Spalding 4328-007-010 1939 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
240 South Spalding 4328-010-024 1931 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
244 South Spalding 4328-010-023 1930 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
248 South Spalding 4328-010-022 1933 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
249 South Spalding 4328-006-003 1931 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
252 South Spalding 4328-010-021 1928 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
253 South Spalding 4328-006-004 1929 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
256 South Spalding 4328-010-020 1930 6L
260 South Spalding 4328-010-019 1936 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
261 South Spalding 4328-006-006 1939 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
265 South Spalding 4328-006-007 1930 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
.~_ ~ :~ ~ :L_J ~ ~ ~_J ~j
Address Direction Street Parcel No Date Constructed NRHP Status Code Other Identifier269 South Spalding 4328-006-008 1939 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
273 South Spalding 4328-006-009 1928 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
300 South Spalding 4328-011-029 1933 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
304 South Spalding 4328-011-028 1930 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
308 South Spalding 4328-011-027 1935 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
312 South Spalding 4328-011-026 1935 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
316 South Spalding 4328-011-025 1934 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
320 South Spalding 4328-011-024 1934 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
324 South Spalding 4328-011-031 1928 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
340 South Spalding 4328-011-018 1940 5D3 Tract 7710 MFR District
344 South Spalding 4328-011-017 1929 6Z
404 South Spalding 4330-009-016 1939 6Z
408 South Spalding 4330-009-015 1939 6L
412 South Spalding 4330-009-014 1940 6L
426 South Spalding 4330-009-011 1940 6L
432 South Spalding 4330-009-018 1949 6L
Tract 7710 MFR 01st 5S3 Tract 7710 MFR District Primary Record
9201 Whitworth 4332-001-015 1940 6L
9221 Whitworth 4332-001-016 1940 6L
9255 Whitworth 4330-034-016 1948 6Z
9929 Young 4328-005-014 1937 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
9933 Young 4328-005-015 1936 5B Tract 7710 MFR District
9937 Young 4328-005-016 1948 6L
9941 Young 4328-005-017 1929 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
9945 Young 4328-005-018 1936 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
9949 Young 4328-005-019 1930 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
9953 Young 4328-005-020 1927 503 Tract 7710 MFR District
Page2O of20
APPENDIX D
Database Property ListingArea 4 Multi-Family Residence Survey
POTENTIAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
•~- —i —~ ~ ~ ~
Area 4 MFR Potential Historic DistrictsDistrict Address Direction Street Date Constructed NRIIP Status CodeBeverly Vista MFR District 128 South Canon 1932 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 132 South Canon 1932 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 136 South Canon 1937 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 137 South Canon 1930 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 140 South Canon 1937 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 141 South Canon 1938 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 144 South Canon 1933 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 150 South Canon 1933 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 152 South Canon 1931 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 153 South Canon 1938 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 157 South Canon 1938 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 125 South Crescent 1932 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 129 South Crescent 1935 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 133 South Crescent 1941 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 137 South Crescent 1941 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 141 South Crescent 1941 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 144 South Crescent 1939 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 145 South Crescent 1941 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 149 South Crescent 1939 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 156 South Crescent 1926 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 157 South Crescent 1935 5B
Beverly Vista MFR District 120 South Elm 1926 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 121 South Elm 1928 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 137 South Elm 1928 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 141 South Elm 1931 5D3
Page 1 of 10
__ ~‘
DistrictBeverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Beverly Vista MFR District
Address Direction Street144 South Elm
145 South Elm
148 South Elm
149 South Elm
152 South Elm
156 South Elm
124 South Maple
148 South Maple
149 South Maple
152 South Maple
153 South Maple
157 South Maple
128 South Palm
132 South Palm
133 South Palm
144 South Palm
148 South Palm
149 South Palm
124 South Reeves
132 South Reeves
133 South Reeves
136 South Reeves
140 South Reeves
145 South Reeves
149 South Reeves
152 South Reeves
156 South Reeves
121 South Rexford
Date Constructed1930
1928
1927
1940
1938
1938
1929
1937
1926
1931
1926
1934
1937
1929
1929
1927
1930
1937
1933
1930
1937
1940
1941
1937
1926
1937
1936
1930
NRHP Status Code5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5B
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
•~<•~~}~ ~
Page 2 of10
~_j ~_j
District Address Direction Street Date Constructed NRHP Status CodeBeverly Vista MFR District 137 South Rexford 1926 5D3
Beverly Vista MFR District 153 South Rextord 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9248 OlympIc 1935 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9307 OlympIc 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9312 OlympIc 1939 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9318 OlympIc 1935 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9319 Olympic 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9330 Olympic 1934 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9331 Olympic 1935 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9336 OlympIc 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9342 Olympic 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9343 OlympIc 1938 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9348 Olympic 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9349 OlympIc 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9354 Olympic 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9355 Olympic 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9360 OlympIc 1931 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9366 OlympIc 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9367 Olympic 1934 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9372 Olympic 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9373 OlympIc 1937 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9379 OlympIc 1930 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9384 Olympic 1935 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9407 Olympic 1941 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9419 OlympIc 1941 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9517 OlympIc 1940 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9528 OlympIc 1935 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9544 OlympIc 1936 5D3
~, ~
Page3oflO
-____ ____ ____ 1 1 ~
District Address Direction Street Date Constructed NRHP Status CodeOlympic Blvd MFR District 9545 Olympic 1936 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9553 Olympic 1936 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9556 OlympIc 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9576 Olympic 1935 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9579 Olympic 1935 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9594 Olympic 1941 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9600 OlympIc 1940 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9609 Olympic 1941 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9614 OlympIc 1940 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9619 OlympIc 1940 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9620 Olympic 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9641 OlympIc 1940 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9642 Olympic 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9648 OlympIc 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9654 Olympic 1935 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9657 Olympic 1936 5B
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9660 Olympic 1935 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9683 Olympic 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9741 Olympic 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9749 Olympic 1936 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9750 Olympic 1939 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9800 OlympIc 1939 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9830 OlympIc 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9840 OlympIc 1937 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9850 OlympIc 1938 5D3
Olympic Blvd MFR District 9860 Olympic 1938 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 422 Smlthwood 1937 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 424 Smithwood 1940 5D3
m
~i
. . ~—. .; ~ ~—----~
District Address Direction Street Date Constructed NRIIP Status CodeSmithwood Drive MFR District 428 Smlthwood 1931 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 432 Smlthwood 1931 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 436 Smfthwood 1933 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 440 Smithwood 1930 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 444 Smithwood 1940 5B
Smithwood Drive MFR District 452 Smithwood 1928 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 456 Smithwood 1929 5D3
Smithwood Drive MFR District 460 Smithwood 1935 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 401 South Bedford 1934 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 418 South Bedford 1936 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 419 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 422 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 423 South Bedford 1930 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 426 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 427 South Bedford 1930 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 430 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 431 South Bedford 1930 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 434 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 435 South Bedford 1933 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 438 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 439 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 442 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 443 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 446 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 447 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 450 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 454 South Bedford 1929 5D3
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District 458 South Bedford 1938 5D3
Page 5 of 10
~ ~ ~ ~ ~—~~—-— .—.~ __
District ________________________________________________________________________________________
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
South Roxbury-Bedford Drive MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Address Direction Street Date Constructed NRHP Status Code459 South Bedford 1935 5D3
462 South Bedford 1930 5D3
463 South Bedford 1927 5D3
467 South Bedford 1938 5D3
471 South Bedford 1935 5D3
475 South Bedford 1935 5D3
478 South Bedford 1931 5D3
418 South Roxbury 1929 5D3
422 South Roxbury 1930 5D3
426 South Roxbury 1930 5D3
430 South Roxbury 1937 5D3
434 South Roxbury 1930 5D3
442 South Roxbury 1937 5D3
446 South Roxbury 1930 5D3
450 South Roxbury 1930 5D3
454 South Roxbury 1931 5D3
458 South Roxbury 1938 5D3
132 South Bedford 1930 5D3
133 South Bedford 1936 5D3
137 South Bedford 1924 5D3
140 South Bedford 1935 5D3
141 South Bedford 1937 5D3
145 South Bedford 1935 5D3
148 South Bedford 1929 5D3
149 South Bedford 1936 5B
153 South Bedford 1938 5D3
124 South Camden 1925 5D3
128 South Camden 1931 5D3
Page 6 of 10
L~ ~L_~ ~J L.i ~ •~ ~ __ ~
DistrictTract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Address Direction Street137 South Camden
140 South Camden
144 South Camden
148 South Camden
152 South Camden
153 South Camden
200 South Lasky
203 South Lasky
204 South Lasky
208 South Lasky
220 South Lasky
224 South Lasky
228 South Lasky
232 South Lasky
236 South Lasky
240 South Lasky
244 South Lasky
248 South Lasky
252 South Lasky
256 South Lasky
133 South Linden
153 South Linden
132 South Mccarty
136 South McCarty
133 South Peck
136 South Peck
137 South Peck
140 South Peck
Date Constructed NRHP Status Code1936 5D3
1931 5D3
1936 5D3
1936 5D3
1933 5D3
1937 5D3
1936 5D3
1930 56
1940 5D3
1926 5D3
1931 5D3
1936 5D3
1928 5B
1925 5D3
1933 5D3
1928 5D3
1939 5D3
1936 5D3
1930 5D3
1939 5D3
1935 5D3
1941 5D3
1938 5D3
1940 5D3
1931 58
1938 5D3
1937 5D3
1938 5D3
Page 7ofIO
.~_- L_~ *~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
District Address Direction Street Date Constructed NRHP Status CodeTract 7710 MFR District 141 South Peck 1926 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 144 South Peck 1936 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 145 South Peck 1940 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 148 South Peck 1931 5B
Tract 7710 MFR District 149 South Peck 1940 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 152 South Peck 1928 5B
Tract 7710 MFR District 9905 Robblns 1931 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9915 Robblns 1928 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9921 Robb~ns 1938 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9924 Robblns 1938 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9925 Robbins 1940 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9928 Robblns 1935 5D3
Tract 7710 ~ViFR District 9929 Robblns 1929 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9932 Robblns 1931 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9936 Robblns 1937 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9939 Robbins 1926 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9940 Robbins 1936 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9944 Robbins 1931 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9945 Robblns 1940 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9948 Robblns 1928 5B
Tract 7710 MFR District 9949 Robblns 1940 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9952 Robblns 1933 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9953 Robblns 1937 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9961 Robbins 1936 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 9966 Robblns 1936 5B
Tract 7710 MFR District 132 South Roxbury 1936 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 136 South Roxbury 1941 5D3
Tract 7710 MFR District 137 South Roxbury 1931 58
PageS of 10
I ___ fl___ ___ *
DistrictTract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Address Direction Street140 South Roxbury
141 South Roxbury
149 South Roxbury
152 South Roxbury
153 South Roxbury
132 South Spalding
144 South Spalding
150 South Spalding
153 South Spalding
154 South Spalding
200 South Spaldlng
204 South Spalding
208 South Spalding
212 South Spalding
216 South Spaldlng
220 South Spalding
224 South Spaiding
228 South Spa~ding
233 South Spalding
237 South Spalding
240 South Spaidlng
244 South Spalding
248 South Spaiding
249 South Spalding
252 South Spalding
253 South Spaldlng
257 South Spaiding
260 South Spalding
Date Constructed1929
1930
1930
1936
1937
1937
1936
1937
1940
1936
1939
1930
1936
1939
1935
1938
1929
1934
1939
1939
1931
1930
1933
1931
1928
1929
1930
1936
NRHP Status Code5D3
5D3
5D3
5B
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5B
5D3
5D3
5D3
Page 9ofIO
____ ____ 1 1— —
DistrictTract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Tract 7710 MFR District
Address Direction Street261 South Spalding
265 South Spalding
269 South Spalding
273 South Spalding
300 South Spalding
304 South Spalding
308 South Spalding
312 South Spalding
316 South Spalding
320 South Spalding
324 South Spalding
340 South Spalding
9929 Young
9933 Young
Date Constructed1939
1930
1939
1928
1933
1930
1935
1935
1934
1934
1928
1940
1937
NRHP Status Code5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5B
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
SB
5B
9941
9945
9949
9953
Young
Young
Young
Young
1936
1929
1936
1930
1927
5D3
5D3
5D3
5D3
Page lOoflO
APPENDIX E
Historic Resource Survey UpdateState Inventory Forms
DPR 523L Forms
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004
APPENDIX F
Area 4 Multi-Family Residence SurveyState Inventory Forms
DPR 523A Forms
City of Beverly Hills Historic Resources Survey ReportPCR Services Corporation June 2004