Western Water Template · Sewerage Code of Australia WSA 02-2014-3.1 Melbourne ... specified on the...
Transcript of Western Water Template · Sewerage Code of Australia WSA 02-2014-3.1 Melbourne ... specified on the...
SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Supplementary Information to the WSAA Sewerage Code of Australia
WSA 02-2014-3.1 Melbourne Retail Water Agencies Edition Version 2
Western Water
January 2018
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 2 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Executive Summary
This Design Standard has been produced as a guide for use by technical personnel involved with the
design and construction of gravity sewers within Western Water’s service area.
The design and construction of sewer mains required for provision of services to subdivisions and other
land development works should be carried out in accordance with this Design Standard and the WSAA
Sewerage Code of Australia WSA 02-2014-3.1 Melbourne Retail Water Agencies Edition Version 2.0
(“the Sewerage Code”). The requirements set out in this Design Standard take precedence over those
in the Sewerage Code.
This document is a guideline only, and not intended to be a detailed specification for the purposes of
the design and construction of sewer mains. Designers and constructors are responsible for the
respective aspects of the design and construction process and the justification of any variations from
the requirements set out in the Sewerage Code and this Design Standard. Where there are any
discrepancies or inconsistencies between the Sewerage Code, this Design Standard, or any other
documents, standards or practices these should be discussed with Western Water prior to proceeding.
Enquiries or suggestions relating to the information set out in this Design Standard are welcome and
can be directed via email to [email protected]
Western Water will update this document as changes become necessary, and the most up to date
version will be available on our website.
This edition applies to all developments and sewerage design projects issued to commence design on
or after the publication date unless otherwise stated in writing by Western Water.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 3 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Table of Contents
2.0 SYSTEM PLANNING .................................................................................................. 5
2.3 PLANNING PRNCIPLES .............................................................................................. 5
2.3.4 Provision for future gauging needs ....................................................................... 5
2.4 PLANNING PARAMETERS ........................................................................................... 5
2.4.1 Loading per serviced lot ...................................................................................... 5
2.4.2 Estimating future catchment loads ........................................................................ 5
2.4.5 Environmental, cultural and heritage impacts ......................................................... 5
3.0 FLOW ESTIMATION .................................................................................................. 5
3.3 Design Flow Estimation Method .................................................................................. 5
3.3.5 Flow schedule .................................................................................................... 5
4.0 PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS ...................................................................................... 5
4.1 General .................................................................................................................. 5
5.0 DETAIL DESIGN ....................................................................................................... 6
5.2 Detailed Design Considerations .................................................................................. 6
5.2.4 Location of sewers ............................................................................................. 6
5.3 Horizontal Alignment of Sewers .................................................................................. 6
5.3.2 Roads, reserves and open space .......................................................................... 6
5.3.8 Horizontal curves in sewers ................................................................................. 6
5.6 Vertical Alignment of Sewers ..................................................................................... 6
5.6.4 Lot servicing requirements .................................................................................. 6
5.6.7 Vertical curves in sewers ..................................................................................... 6
5.6.8 Compound curves .............................................................................................. 7
7.0 MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES ..................................................................................... 7
7.3.2 Maintenance structure spacing—Reticulation sewers ................................................ 7
7.4 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LOCATION OF MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES ................... 7
7.9 MAINTENANCE STRUCTURE COVERS .......................................................................... 8
7.9.1 General ............................................................................................................ 8
8.0 ANCILLARY STRUCTURES .......................................................................................... 8
8.2 Water Seals and Boundary Traps ................................................................................ 8
8.2.1 Boundary traps on sanitary drains ........................................................................ 8
8.2.2 Water seals and gas check MHs ............................................................................ 8
10.0 DESIGN REVIEW AND DRAWINGS .............................................................................. 8
10.5 Recording of Work as Constructed Information ............................................................. 8
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 4 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Part 2: Construction ............................................................................................................. 8
16.11 Markers ............................................................................................................... 8
16.11.3 MRWA Marker Posts ........................................................................................... 8
Appendix A – Sewerage Design Checklist ................................................................................. 9
Appendix B – CCTV Inspection Acceptance Criteria For Newly Constructed Sewerage Assets ......... 14
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 5 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Part 1: Planning and Design
2.0 SYSTEM PLANNING
2.3 PLANNING PRNCIPLES
2.3.4 Provision for future gauging needs
Include the following general information:
Western Water shall advise if and where gauging stations are required
2.4 PLANNING PARAMETERS
2.4.1 Loading per serviced lot
Include the following general information:
Information pertaining to Land Use Zoning and existing infrastructure owned and maintained shall be
obtained from Western Water
2.4.2 Estimating future catchment loads
Include the following general information:
Estimating the future catchment load is to be based upon EP (Equivalent Population) and a residential
loading rate of 180l/EP/Day.
2.4.5 Environmental, cultural and heritage impacts
Include the following general information:
An Environmental and heritage plan will be required at the planning stage refer to Clause 5.2.7 WSA
02_2014 MRWA version 2.
3.0 FLOW ESTIMATION
3.3 Design Flow Estimation Method
3.3.5 Flow schedule
Include the following information:
A schedule of all flows is to be provided in a CSV (comma delimited) file format.
4.0 PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS
4.1 General
Additional requirement:
Products and materials shall be in accordance with City West Water approved products and materials
specified on the MRWA Portal www.mrwa.com.au/Pages/Products.aspx unless otherwise amended in
this document.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 6 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
5.0 DETAIL DESIGN
5.2 Detailed Design Considerations
5.2.4 Location of sewers
5.2.4.3 Sewers located along rear boundaries
Include the following information:
Sewers located along a rear boundary will not be accepted by Western Water unless it can be
demonstrated it is unavoidable.
5.3 Horizontal Alignment of Sewers
5.3.2 Roads, reserves and open space
Include the following information:
Unless otherwise agreed for the purposes of design minor roads are to be treated as major roads
5.3.8 Horizontal curves in sewers
Replace second paragraph with the following:
Western Water will only permit horizontal curves by deflecting consecutive flexible joints, provided no
individual joint deflection exceeds the manufacturer’s recommended maximum joint deflection of a single
socket and using full pipe lengths. In some pipe systems the maximum allowable joint deflection is marked
on the pipe socket.
5.6 Vertical Alignment of Sewers
5.6.4 Lot servicing requirements
5.6.4.3 Serviced area requirements for industrial and commercial lots
Addendum:
Western Water will not accept partial lot servicing unless it can be demonstrated that there are no
alternatives.
5.6.7 Vertical curves in sewers
Replace with the following:
Western Water will only accept vertical curves where:
The curvature is within the limitations as stated for horizontal curves
AND
It can be demonstrated that the lowest whole life cost cannot otherwise be achieved
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 7 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
5.6.8 Compound curves
Replace with the following
Western Water does not permit the use of compound curves
7.0 MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES
7.3.2 Maintenance structure spacing—Reticulation sewers
Replace up to and including MRWA Table 7.1 with the following:
For reticulation sewers, the maximum distance between any two consecutive maintenance structures
shall be 150 m.
Maximum spacings shall be in accordance with Table 7.1 below
TABLE 7.1
MAXIMUM SPACINGS
Upstream
Structure
Downstream
Structure
Land Type Max Separation
End of Line or IS MS, MC Private Property 80 m
End of Line or IS MS, MC or MH Public Land 100 m
MS or MC MS, MC Private Property 150 m
MS or MC MS, MC or MH Public Land 150 m
MH MS or MC Private Property 150 m
MH MS or MC Public Land 150 m
IS or MH MH (with
intermediate
structures)
Any 300 m
7.4 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LOCATION OF MAINTENANCE
STRUCTURES
Replace with the following:
The following locations for maintenance structures shall be avoided as far as practicable:
i. Within major road reserves;
ii. Within railway reserves (Refer to Clause 5.3.3).
iii. In floodways below 1:100 year flood levels and below high tide.
iv. In coastal zones and below maximum high tide levels (Refer to Clause 5.2.7.5).
v. Where access to the structure is likely to be severely restricted e.g. foreshores
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 8 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
7.9 MAINTENANCE STRUCTURE COVERS
7.9.1 General
Add the following:
(e) Public play grounds
(f) School grounds
8.0 ANCILLARY STRUCTURES
8.2 Water Seals and Boundary Traps
8.2.1 Boundary traps on sanitary drains
Replace with the following:
Boundary traps are not acceptable at property boundaries
8.2.2 Water seals and gas check MHs
8.2.3.3 Gas check MHs
Replace with the following:
Gas check MHs are not approved
10.0 DESIGN REVIEW AND DRAWINGS
10.5 Recording of Work as Constructed Information
Add the following:
As Constructed information shall be provided in accordance with Section 4.6 of Western Water’s Land
Development Manual
Part 2: Construction
16.11 Markers
16.11.3 MRWA Marker Posts
Add the following:
Refer to Western Water’s approved list of materials
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 9 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Appendix A – Sewerage Design Checklist
Criteria Complete Comments
Survey Datum
Is the Australian Height Datum (A.H.D) noted on design plans?
Is the Australian Map Grid (A.M.G) / Geocentric Datum of
Australia (G.D.A) noted on design plans?
Are PBMs and/or TBM's shown on design plans and are
AMG/GDA co-ordinates for these PBMs/TBMs shown?
Has the whole catchment (required to be controlled through this
development) been controlled?
Gravity Sewers, Rising Mains or Siphons
Are all sewers along the front of properties located within road
reserve and not within the property unless otherwise approved
by Western Water?
Are there any curved sewers? Note that curved sewers are only
permitted for 150mm diameter sewers.
Are all curved sewers designed correctly (radius greater than
the standard, jointing technique, no property connections on the
curved sections etc.)?
Is minimum cover achieved on all pipes?
Has continuously jointed pipe been specified for any water
crossings?
Are there any railway crossings? Has the crossing design been
carried out in accordance with the Australian Standards and
VicTrack requirements? Has VicTrack provided written approval?
Note a detail drawing for the railway crossing to 1:500 scale in
addition to a locality plan should be provided.
Are all maintenance structures located out of the railway
reserve? Is a minimum of 1m clear space provided around
maintenance structure near confined boundaries?
Are there any freeway crossings? Has the crossing design been
carried out in accordance with the Australian Standards and
VicRoads requirements? Has VicRoads provided written
approval?
Does the alignment of the pipeline cross at right angles to the
freeway?
Are all maintenance structures located clear of the freeway
reserve?
Are minimum clearances from other services achieved?
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 10 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Criteria Complete Comments
Are there any crossings of Council Drains or Melbourne
Water/Southern Rural Water drains/waterways? Has written
approval to the design been obtained?
Does the location of the rising main comply with Western Water
requirements?
Western Water approval for installation of Siphon received?
Do offsets of the sewer comply with WSAA standards?
Have all existing utilities been identified on drawings?
Has a Dial Before You Dig (DBYD) search been carried out?
Are any works proposed within a VicRoads declared road?
Are any works proposed in the vicinity of Melbourne Water
assets and/or waterways? Has the design taken into account
Melbourne Water requirements?
Has the requirement for odour control measures been assessed
and incorporated into the design?
Maintenance Structures
Does the distance between maintenance structures comply with
standards (i.e. generally 100m as per Western Water
requirements)?
Are all maintenance structures numbered in accordance with
standards?
Is the area subject to flooding?
If subject to flooding, do all maintenance holes have bolt down
covers and are all cover levels above the 1 in 5 year storm
event level?
Are there any gas check maintenance holes? Has the use of gas
check maintenance holes been approved by Western Water?
Are Gas Check maintenance holes located in the road reserve
and are there ultimately more than 50 lots connected to it?
Are there any maintenance holes greater than 6m in depth?
Are landings, handgrips, ladders etc. in accordance with
standards and are correct materials specified on design plans?
Are structural computations of maintenance structures deeper
than 6m provided?
Are all maintenance structure locations in accordance with
Western Water standards and with a minimum of 1m clearance
from confined boundaries?
Are minimum clearances to other services achieved?
Are the maintenance holes’ cover class and cover size noted on
design plans?
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 11 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Criteria Complete Comments
Have any pre-cast maintenance holes been specified? Has their
used been approved by Western Water?
Are correct diameters of maintenance holes nominated on
design plans, as well as the minimum diameter to be used?
Is detailed MH table design required to be submitted? (e.g. two
or more internal drops, three or more incoming sewers, sewers
offset from the MH centre, angle of deflection >90o)
Are MH table designs in accordance with standards?
Are there any sewers or other underground structures to be
built next to existing structures?
Are guidance notes provided to the contractor for excavation
next to existing manholes to preserve stability of the manholes
during construction?
Where connecting to existing MHs, have these been inspected
as part of the design and are details provided on the drawings
of the existing layout and modifications required? Are working
spaces still to standard?
Design of Gravity Sewers (including Hydraulics)
Are the correct pipe diameters specified in accordance with
standards?
Does the grade of each pipe comply with standards?
Are IL's of sewers correctly identified?
Are all pipe materials, pipe classes, jointing methods etc.
specified on design plans and are they all approved products?
Is the trench width provided or referred to relevant design
standards?
Has the embedment material been specified and is it suitable
for the pipe and geotechnical conditions?
Are compaction requirements for trench bottom (if required),
embedment, and backfill specified or referred to relevant
Australian Standards?
Are backfill design specifications provided or referred to WSAA
code drawing or relevant standards?
Are embedment types specified according to WSAA standard
drawings or cross section details provided?
Are any grades steeper than 1 in 10 or flatter than 1 upon
diameter?
Have trench stops been provided where required?
Is the velocity through the pipe below 3 m/s in both partial and
full flow (or under pressure flow if a pressure main)?
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 12 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Criteria Complete Comments
For steeply graded sewers, is the energy dissipated in the
maintenance hole?
Are there any sewers greater than 5m in depth?
Has the ground conditions report been provided for sewers
deeper than 5m?
Are there wet/poor ground conditions?
Has a specialist geotechnical assessment been made?
Has adequate trench design been made and relevant details
provided?
Has an Emergency Relief Structure (ERS) been incorporated in
design?
Have HGL details been submitted ensuring that there is no
possibility of overflow upstream at MHs, property drains, etc?
Are structural design computations for trench design sewer
pipes provided?
Are water seals (i.e. boundary traps) specified where required,
and has Western Water approval been obtained for their use?
Property Connections
Are all properties provided with a property branch/connection
and is the type of branch/connection nominated on design
plans?
Have any Y-property branches/connections been nominated?
(note not permitted)
Is the depth for property connections junctions and end fittings
in accordance with the standard?
Do property connections extend beyond the property/easement
boundary by a minimum of 500mm?
Gravity Sewers greater than 225mm in Diameter
Are self cleansing/slime stripping velocities achieved at PDWF?
Is the class of pipe and all embedment details shown on design
plans?
Are any sewers surcharging under 1 in 5 year floods (i.e.
PWWF)?
Are property connections only on sewers 300mm in dia. and
less?
Inverted Siphons
Are minimum velocities achieved at PDWF?
Does the difference in inlet level and outlet level comply with
Western Water standards?
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 13 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Criteria Complete Comments
Has the siphon hydraulics been designed to confirm sediments
are flushed through the downstream reach of the siphon during
PDWF?
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Has the designer, in designing the sewerage system element
that is being audited, integrated hazard identification and risk
assessment methods to eliminate the risk of injury throughout
the life of the system?
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 14 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Appendix B – CCTV Inspection Acceptance Criteria For
Newly Constructed Sewerage Assets
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 15 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
TABLE B1
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR RIGID SEWERS – VITRIFIED CLAY, STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE
Defect/Feature Characterisation 1 Characterisation 2 Quantification 1 Acceptance determination and explanation
Cracking C L, C, S, or M Surface cracking is common in concrete and is usually
not of concern. Such cracking is usually of limited
extent and does indicate structural failure. However,
surface cracking that is extensive may indicate a
problem with concrete quality. Report in remarks for
the Water Agency to review.
Surface cracking is unlikely in VC products currently on
the market although it should be noted that internally
glazed VC pipes are now again available. If surface
cracking is observed report in remarks for the Water
Agency to review.
Fracturing F L, C, S, or M Not acceptable – all of these types of cracking are
indicative of poor handling, unsatisfactory installation
or overloading.
Breaking B D, M, or E Not acceptable.
Deformation D Not acceptable.
Collapsed X Not acceptable.
Porous sewers
(pipes) PP
Not acceptable.
Surface damage S
* Not applicable to
VC
S, AV*, or W Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Z Identify, report and refer to Water Agency for
acceptance determination.
AP*, AM*, RC*, CP*,
H* or WS*
Not acceptable - unlikely to be observed in new
construction.
RV* or RVP* Not acceptable - cover to reinforcement is clearly less
than specified in relevant pipe standard.
continued
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 16 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Defect/Feature Characterisation 1 Characterisation 2 Quantification 1 Acceptance determination and explanation
Lining defective
PL**
** Applicable to
plastics lined
concrete pipes only
D, E, WD or L Defects indicated not acceptable. The lining is placed
during manufacture in the top 330° of the pipe and is
required to be joined after installation at each pipe
joint.
Z Lining on invert of pipe (pipe installed upside down) –
not acceptable.
Identify other defects, report in remarks and refer to
Water Agency for acceptance determination.
Deposits on wall or
invert DE
E Not acceptable - should not occur in new sewer.
S or R Not acceptable.
C Not acceptable.
W or Z Identify material, report in remarks and refer to Water
Agency for acceptance determination.
Exfiltration EX Not acceptable – exfiltration is most likely associated
with a joint defect or broken pipe.
Infiltration S S, D, R or G Not acceptable.
Ingress of soil ING Not acceptable.
Roots R T, F, or M Not acceptable – the presence of roots indicated a
possible problem with installation at joints, poor quality
concrete, cracks and/or fractures.
Joint displacement
JD
L Not acceptable – if joint displacement exceeds
maximum specified by manufacturer for the joint.
R >5 mm for pipe
sizes up to DN 250
>10 mm for pipe
sizes from above
DN 250 to DN 500
>20 mm for pipe
sizes above DN 500
Not acceptable.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 17 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Defect/Feature Characterisation 1 Characterisation 2 Quantification 1 Acceptance determination and explanation
A Normally unacceptable on ‘straight’ sewers (see
maximum limits for ‘curved’ sewers below). Report
deflection and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
For ‘curved’ sewers using ‘pulled’ pipes report the
distance between the end of spigot and end of socket
(adjoining pipe) at worst point and the angular
deflection at the joint. Refer to Water Agency for
acceptance determination.
Jointing material
(seal) intrusion) JI
R N, HH, HL or B Not acceptable.
Z Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Point repair RP L, I, S, H or IC Some techniques may not be acceptable in new sewers.
Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Z Identify repair technique, report in remarks and refer to
Water Agency for acceptance determination.
Defective repair RX M or P Not acceptable.
B or Z Determine extent of ‘bellies’ or other defects. Report
and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Obstruction OB B, M, I, J or C Not acceptable.
Z Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
P or S Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Flow (water) level
WL
>15mm or 5%
whichever is the
greater (no flow
from upstream and
no blockage or
debris
downstream)
Not acceptable above the limit indicated.
Flow (water) level above a nominal level may be caused
by flow from upstream or a blockage, debris in the
invert or some other feature downstream. It is not a
defect itself.
It does indicate a defect. However, where there is no
flow from upstream and there is no blockage
downstream, the most likely defect indicated in this
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 18 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Defect/Feature Characterisation 1 Characterisation 2 Quantification 1 Acceptance determination and explanation
situation is gradient misalignment (i.e. one of more
pipes have dropped below the grade and ponding has
occurred).
Defective junction
JX
P, D, B, BC, SR, SE or
Z
Not acceptable.
Connection CN G or P Not acceptable - junction required.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 19 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
TABLE B2
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR FLEXIBLE SEWER PIPES – PLASTICS (PVC, PE, PP, GRP), DUCTILE IRON AND STEEL
Defect/Feature Characterisation 1 Characterisation 2 Quantification 1 Remarks
Cracking C L, C, S, or M S Not acceptable. Not usually a feature of these pipe
materials but may be apparent in cement mortar linings
and internal corrosion barrier (“gel-coat”) of GRP.
Report as Lining defective ‘PL’.
L, C, S, or M W Not acceptable. Not usually a feature of these pipe
materials but where it does occur, it would generally
indicate excessive external loads from construction
equipment.
Fracturing F L, C, S, or M Not acceptable.
Breaking B D, M, or E Not acceptable.
Deformation D >5% after 60 days Not acceptable.
Local or point
deformation – no
code
No code
Record General
Comment GC
Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination. An unusual feature with many possible
causes.
Collapsed X Not acceptable.
Porous sewers
(pipes) PP
Not acceptable. Not likely to be a feature of these
pipes.
Surface damage S W Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Z Identify, where possible, report and refer to Water
Agency for acceptance determination.
CP or H Not acceptable. Unlikely to be observed in new
construction.
Lining defective PL D●, E●* or B●* Not acceptable
* Applicable to internal corrosion barrier in GRP pipes
* Applicable to PE internal lining of ductile iron and
steel pipes
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 20 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Defect/Feature Characterisation 1 Characterisation 2 Quantification 1 Remarks
Z Identify other defects, where possible, report and refer
to Water Agency for acceptance determination.
Deposits on wall
or in invert DE
E Not acceptable - Should not occur in new sewer.
S or R Not acceptable.
C Not acceptable.
W or Z Identify, where possible, report and refer to Water
Agency for acceptance determination.
Exfiltration EX Not acceptable – exfiltration is most likely associated
with a joint defect or broken pipe.
Infiltration S S, D, R or G Not acceptable.
Ingress of soil ING Not acceptable.
Roots R T, F, or M Not acceptable – the presence of roots indicated a
possible problem with installation at joints, poor quality
concrete, cracks and/or fractures.
Joint displacement
JD
L Not acceptable – if joint displacement exceeds
maximum specified by manufacturer for the joint.
R >5 mm for pipe
sizes up to DN 250
>10 mm for pipe
sizes from above
DN 250 to DN 500
>20 mm for pipe
sizes above DN 500
Not acceptable.
A Normally unacceptable on ‘straight’ sewers (see
maximum limits for ‘curved’ sewers below). Report
deflection and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
For ‘curved’ sewers using ‘pulled’ pipes report the
distance between the end of spigot and end of socket
(adjoining pipe) at worst point and the angular
deflection at the joint. Refer to Water Agency for
acceptance determination.
Jointing material R N, HH, HL or B Not acceptable.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 21 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Defect/Feature Characterisation 1 Characterisation 2 Quantification 1 Remarks
(seal) intrusion) JI Z Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Point repair RP L, I, S, H or IC Some techniques may not be acceptable in a new
sewer. Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Z Identify repair technique, report in remarks and refer to
Water Agency for acceptance determination.
Defective repair
RX
M or P Not acceptable.
B or Z Determine extent of ‘bellies’ or other defects, report
and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Obstruction OB B, M, I, J or C Not acceptable.
Z Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
P or S Report and refer to Water Agency for acceptance
determination.
Flow (water) level
WL
>15mm or 5%
whichever is the
greater (no flow
from upstream and
no blockage or
debris
downstream)
Not acceptable above the limit indicated.
Flow (water) level above a nominal level may be caused
by flow from upstream or a blockage, debris in the
invert or some other feature downstream. It is not a
defect itself.
It does indicate a defect. However, where there is no
flow from upstream and there is no blockage
downstream, the most likely defect indicated in this
situation is gradient misalignment (i.e. one of more
pipes have dropped below the grade and ponding has
occurred).
Defective junction
JX
P, D, B, BC, SR, SE or
Z
Not acceptable.
Connection CN G or P Not acceptable - junction required.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 22 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
TABLE B3
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA PIPE AND FITTING CONFIGURATION – ALL SEWERS
The configuration of items in a new sewer is usually defined in design drawings, standard drawings and specifications Compliance with some of these requirements may be determined by inspection
The inspector shall have a copy of design drawings, standard drawings and specifications applicable to the works being inspected for reference in determining the acceptance of nominated and other features.
The following table describes nominated features that are to be reported to the Water Agency.
Feature Description Acceptance determination and explanation
Rocker
pipes
These a shorter pipes than the normal unit pipe length and
are required by some Water Agencies adjacent to structures
such as maintenance holes, other structures and concrete
encasement
The purpose is to allow for differential settlement between
the structure and the pipeline without cracking, fracturing or
distortion of the pipe adjacent to the structure
The required length of rocker pipe and the configuration of pipes at the
structure are specified in design drawings, standard drawings and or
specifications for particular pipe materials.
The inspector should record the distance at each joint adjacent to the
structure to determine the length of the rocker pipe and report it in
remarks.
Length outside of tolerance of ± 150mm of required length not
acceptable – refer to Water Agency for acceptance determination.
Bends Bends occur in some sewers at changes of direction and or
grade. In some cases compound bends (vertical and
horizontal) may be encountered
In small diameters up to DN 225 bends are likely to be moulded or post-formed long radius. For DN 225 it is likely
that bends will be fabricated in a ‘lobster back’ with a series
of mitre cuts and the pipes joined with epoxy, hot air
welding or some other technique
Not acceptable if the camera unit cannot pass through the bend.
Not acceptable if jointing materials at mitres intrude more than 10mm
into the sewer.
The transition to bend from straight line should not exceed the angular
deflection for the joint system used Record joint deflection if
observable.
Where the installation of the bend results in ponding the acceptance
criteria applied for maximum water level in the previous tables shall
also be applied.
The distance at the start and finish of bends shall be recorded in the
inspection report.
Connections This is where another sewer to provide a service for a
customer has been connected to the pipeline being
inspected after the pipeline has been installed The
connection is formed by making a hole in the original pipe
and setting the connecting pipe in place
Not acceptable.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | SEWERAGE DESIGN STANDARD
Version: 1 Controlled Document Document Owner: STANDARDS TEAM
Ref: CAPDEV - STANDARD - SEWERAGE DESIGN Page 23 of 23 Uncontrolled when Printed
Authorised: GENERAL MANAGER SUSTAINABLE WATER SOLUTIONS Date Authorised: January 2018
Feature Description Acceptance determination and explanation
This feature is not part of new sewer construction
continued
Junction A junction is a prefabricated fitting installed as part of the
original construction or post construction by inserting the
junction fitting in the pipeline
Junctions are provided to allow customers to connect house
drains directly to the sewer or allow a property connection
sewer to be extended to the customer’s property
Acceptable configurations of junctions should be specified by
the Water Agency
Not acceptable if configuration varied from Water Agency’s
specification/standard drawing.
All junctions for direct customer connection should be provided with a
PVC plain wall solvent weld socket with screwed cap or for VC, a
plugged VC to PVC plain wall adaptor
Inspect each junction lateral and report compliance
Maintenance
shafts and
chambers
Provide access to the sewer for maintenance equipment but
not person entry
May have an integral bend or may have an adjoining
(generally upstream) long radius bend
Can have up to three inlets
Not acceptable if the CCTV camera and transportation unit cannot
traverse through the maintenance shaft.
The transition to maintenance shaft from bend or straight line must not
exceed the angular deflection for the joint system used
Record joint deflection if observable and refer to Water Agency for
acceptance determination.