Welcome to participants ’SURVIVAL OF HUSSAIN SAGAR’ in ...
Transcript of Welcome to participants ’SURVIVAL OF HUSSAIN SAGAR’ in ...
<date/time> <footer> 1
Welcome to participants’SURVIVAL OF HUSSAIN SAGAR’
in light of National Green Tribunal Joint Committee Visits and Reports on Hussain Sagar
in ongoing case OA 85/2015 at NGT Chennai
2 March 2021, The Hyderabad Boats Club, Near Lumbini Park,
Hussain Sagar, Hyderabad
Tspcb map highlighting IDAs and inflows into water bodies
‘Highest peak in catchment 642M north of Nizampet;
Lowest contour near tanbkbund at 500M;
North-South dip 142M covering distance of 17 kms;
Catchment area of 287/240 sq kms – More than 30 lakes;
Full Tank Level 513.41M
Area ?? 5000acres as per SC report 2005 to around 900 acres?
petition has been filed seeking orders to prohibit the pollutant inflows, to allow all rain inflows, to stop pollutant outflows as it destroys Moosi nadi, to remove encroachments and to restore the Hussain sagar lake being a lifeline of Hyderabad,
SECRETARIAT PERMISSION DUBIOUS
FTL tampered with
WHERE IS THE SECRETARIAT DEBRIS?
Secretariat area cutting through the FTL and buffer zone boundary
Secretariat debris?? Dumped in Hussain Sagar?? Whereas, on 27.07.2020,prominent news papers carried the news
that demolition creating debris of 2.2lac metric ton more than 4500 truck loads of debris could be generated and more than 2000 truck loads of debris has been removed from the debris site. when piled up to a height of five to six metres, could need over 30,000 square metres of land. - said a Civil Engineering expert in government requesting anonymity.
SECRETARIAT – A PERMANENT POLLUTION N ENCROACHER
as per CPCB report of 2018, Moosi Nadi that is declared as priority I polluted river
stretch is around 5kms away, much within the 10kms stipulation of the notification.
As per wetland inventory 2011 Hussain Sagar in wetlands; hence secretariat cannot be B
category project;
Secretariat due to above falls under Category A whereas permission obtained under
Category B
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS 7000 CRS?? no. of sewage treatment plants 17 STPs kukatpally nala ; STP
1280,87 CRS; network 873 kms; 1231.04 CRS; 376.5MLD
14 STPs Moosi nadi; 2585.34 crores; 1400.14km network; 2491.79 crores; 883MLD
Present status of STPs
impact of Rs.370 crores of JICA funds that were used to lay diversion
pipes, sewer pumps, STPs. I&D structures, for Hussain Catchment
Improvement Project - State mentioned M/s.Shah consultancy project of
1250 crores with 17 STPs. DPR not submitted .
WHY STATE STPs WHEN BUILDING RULES STIPULATE OWN STPs?
Supreme court monitoring committee – waste waters to be treated in vicinity;
GO 168G.O.Ms.No.168 dated 07.04.2012 the building rules where cellar has to be allocated for STP
Matrix environment LLC - Ezox Llp – Hussain Sagar playground for
contracts and money The Committee was informed by HMDA that they had identified one M/s
Matrix Environment Inc, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad and placed work order worth Rs.1,52,00,000 (Rupees one crore fifty two lacs only) on 25.3.2020 for work to be completed in 6 months.
there is no board of EzOx environment LLP or Matrix Environment LLC at the physical address, rather there are boards pertaining to other companies M/s.Saro Hawai Chappal, Saro power & infrastructure, etc.
the committee appointed by this Tribunal itself could not get any technical documents from HMDA and there is no mention of this project on the HMDA website, nor is the Matrix company mentioning on its website
IDOL IMMERSION AGAINST CPCB GUIDELINES 2019
Idol Immersion CPCB guidelines As per both 2010 CPCB guidelines and as per latest 2019
guidelines there are strict instructions not to immerse idols in the water bodies, rather there are rules for a decentralized immersions of small nature, so that sanctity of water bodies is maintained;
RESPONDENTS DOUBLE UP AS SAVIOURS IN COMMITTEE
All respondents against who we have filed the case are those to assist NEERI while petitioner/citizens left out??
NGT committee came in march 2020 and in december 2020 but did not invite petitioner; Upon NGT orders of 28 jan2021 Joint Committee has invited for meeting on 3 march 2021!!
SUPREME ORDER VIOLATED UMPTEEN TIMES
orders of the Apex Court in SLP No. 5595-96 of 2004 dated 25.04.2005 by granting an interim order that no further construction in, on or around the lake shall be carried out except with leave obtained from the Apex Court.
Further, on 16.01.2014, The Hon’ble Supreme court in civil appeals nos. 2905-2906 of 2005 extended the interim order granted on 25.04.2005 till the matter was finally disposed of by the High Court. It is submitted that the said transferred writ petition in WP No. 25073/2003 still stands pending in the High Court, last being listed on 11.12.2018.
HUSSAIN SAGAR IN WETLAND INVENTORY – BEING DENIED BY STATE
ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES IN AND AROUND HUSSAIN SAGAR LAKE, BEING AN IMPORTANT WETLAND IN NATIONAL INVENTORY OF WETLANDS WITH A 5KM BUFFER ZONE:
Hussain Sagar Lake that extended to more than 1800 acres as per earlier wetland report and SC committee report (originally more than 3000 acres in Chapter 3 of the Supreme Court appointed committee’s report) . As per the 2011 National Wetland Atlas, Sponsored by Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, in March 2011, Hussain sagar lake is recorded as an important man-madewetland built in 16 th century.
FTL 513.41M TAMPERED AS WEIR DISMANTLED IN 2015!
HUSSAIN SAGAR CHOKED WITH ENCROACHMENT AND POLLUTION – SECRETARIAT, MARTYR COMPLEX INSIDE FTL!