WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System.

16
WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System

Transcript of WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System.

WELCOMEProfessional Growth and Evaluation System

Progress of Work

• History

• Overview

• Timeline

Background

Wallace workRace to the TopPractitioner input to develop rubrics

Guidance

• Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Steering Committee(s) (KASA, KSBA, KEA, JCTA, CPE, colleges and universities, EPSB, parents, and individual teachers, principals and superintendents).

PARADIGM SHIFT

Transitioning from Teacher & Principal Quality to Teacher & Principal Effectiveness

Grassroots effort to develop teacher & principal expectations

Holistic approach to determining teacher & principal effectiveness

PARADIGM SHIFT

Use student data to inform evaluationMeet mandates associated with federal

fundingValidity and reliability studyMaintain teacher protections

Characteristics of the New System

• Moves the discussion from teacher quality (as measured by degrees/rank) to teacher & leader effectiveness (are students learning?)

• Focuses on teacher and principal professional growth; is fair and equitable to those being evaluated

Characteristics of the New System

• Developed through a collaborative, inclusive and transparent process

• Comprehensive/holistic approach incorporating multiple measures.

What are the

Multiple Measures?

What progress has been made to date?

• Through a focus group process, 25 volunteer districts recommended changes to the initial and subsequent rubrics over the course of 2010-11. A design team of KDE, KLA*, and Education Partners incorporated those changes to create revised version(s) of the rubric.

• The recommended changes were submitted to the steering committees on three

separate occasions for review and additional recommendations, using a focus group cycle to receive input. A professional development initiative within the Kentucky Association of School Administrators (KASA).

Progress to Date: Implementation Cycle

The feedback loop provided local districts and steering committee members the opportunity to inform the work at each stage of the process.

Progress to Date: Guidance from Experts

• James Stronge (2-day training, April 2011; review of rubric), Charlotte Danielson, Robert Pianta, Doug Reeves, Jon Saphier, Laura Goe

• Experts on the Val-Ed* 360 degree component of the principal rubric are scheduled to be brought in to work with the principal effectiveness steering committee

• and volunteer districts.

The Vanderbilt Assessment for Leadership in EducationTM (VAL-ED) is a research-based evaluation tool that measures the effectiveness of school leaders by providing a detailed assessment of a principal's performance.

Timelines for Deployment of the New System

Next Steps: Development Work

• Continued steering committee and volunteer district meetings scheduled for the upcoming year.

• Revisions to the rubric will continue based on data gleaned from initial focus group and steering committee work.

• Large-scale field-testing will occur during the 2011-2012

school year.

• Communication of the status of the work to

interested parties through presentations to

organizations will continue (KASA, NMSA,

KAAC, KSBA, OVEC, KEDC, CKEC).

Rubric Discussion

ClarifyWhat questions do you have?

ValueWhat have you found that you like?

Support How does this support your

current work?

Sites/Contacts

http://kyprofessionalgrowth.webs.com/documents.htm

http://www.education.ky.gov/kde/homepagerepository/about+kde/kde+strategic+plan+deployment.htm

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]