Week 4
-
Upload
tausique-sheikh -
Category
Engineering
-
view
112 -
download
2
Transcript of Week 4
INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENTS(EE-302)
WEEK 4
UIT SPRING 2016 1
Anderson bridge
Its in fact a modification of the basic Maxwell’s bridge used to find the self inductance value using the comparison technique.
Used for precise measurement over a large range of values.
UIT SPRING 2016 2
Anderson bridge
UIT SPRING 2016 3
Anderson bridge Phasor diagram
UIT SPRING 2016 4
Anderson bridge under balance:
UIT SPRING 2016 5
Under the balance condition the Anderson bridge’s unknown parameters are:
Advantages:
Accurate measurement of capacitance in terms of inductance is possible.
Requires a fixed capacitor instead of a variable capacitor.
Bridge comparatively easier to balance with respect to the Maxwell’s bridge.
UIT SPRING 2016 6
Disadvantages:
Anderson’s bridge is more complicated than other bridges.
Uses more components.
Balance equations are more complicated to drive.
Bridge cannot be easily shielded due to additional junction points, to avoid effect of stray capacitances.
UIT SPRING 2016 7
Example
UIT SPRING 2016 8
Example
UIT SPRING 2016 9
Example
UIT SPRING 2016 10
Hay’s Bridge
Maxwell’s bridge is not suitable for high Q values.
Hay’s bridge is suitable for coils having high Q values.
In Hay’s bridge, capacitor is connected in series with the variable resistance, a change from the Maxwell’s bridge.
For larger phase angles, R1 is needed to be very low which is duly practical.
The bridge is shown below:
UIT SPRING 2016 11
Hay’s bridge
UIT SPRING 2016 12
Hay’s bridge
UIT SPRING 2016 13
For the balanced condition of the bridge:
Example
UIT SPRING 2016 14
Example
UIT SPRING 2016 15
Advantages and Disadvantages of Hay’s Bridge
Best suitable for inductances having Q factor higher than 10.
Quite simple expression for Q factor in terms of the bridge elements.
Disadvantage is that it is suitable only for the measurement of inductances with high Q factor.
UIT SPRING 2016 16
Schering bridge
UIT SPRING 2016 17
One of the most widely used AC bridge for the measurement of unknown capacitance, dielectric losses and power factor.
The Schering bridge is widely used for testing small capacitors at low voltages with very high precision.
UIT SPRING 2016 18
Schering bridge and its balance equations
Power Factor, loss angle and dissipation factor
UIT SPRING 2016 19
The dissipation factor is the reciprocal of Q factor and is given by:
High Voltage Schering bridge
UIT SPRING 2016 20
A stepped up transformer is used to rectify the errors caused by the Schering bridge low voltage measurements. This bridge is shown here:
Wien Bridge
UIT SPRING 2016 21
Primarily it is used to measure the frequency but it can also be used to measure an unknown capacitance with accuracy.
Wien bridge
UIT SPRING 2016 22
Hence 𝑓 = 1/2𝜋𝑅𝐶
Digital to Analog Conversion
UIT SPRING 2016 23
For the DAC the binary input is of the form:
And its subsequent Vout is given by the formula:
UIT SPRING 2016 24
The basic DAC symbol
UIT SPRING 2016 25
The DAC transfer characteristics
UIT SPRING 2016 26
DAC conversion techniques
UIT SPRING 2016 27
DAC: binary weighted
UIT SPRING 2016 28
UIT SPRING 2016 29
DAC: binary weighted
Wide range of resistors are required. For an 8 bit DAC, the largest resistor is 128 times the smallest, hence greater chances of damaging the smallest resistor due to heavy current flow through it.
Integrated Circuit fabrication limitations when it comes to so many varying resistors.
Finite resistances of the switches disturb the resistors values and hence cause errors.
UIT SPRING 2016 30
Binary Weighed DAC Limitations
Inverted R-2R ladder DAC: an improved version
UIT SPRING 2016 31
Why this DAC is better?
UIT SPRING 2016 32
4 Bit R-2R Binary DAC
UIT SPRING 2016 33
UIT SPRING 2016 34
Resolution of the R-2R DAC
UIT SPRING 2016 35
Example
UIT SPRING 2016 36
Advantages of R-2R DAC
Only Two resistors used, hence far more practical as compared to binary weighed ladder.
Any number of bits are possible by just adding more R-2R sections.
UIT SPRING 2016 37
Performance Parameters of DACs
Resolution: Could be defined in terms of the total number of the output values that could be provided by the DAC i.e 2n where n is the number of bits.
It could also be defined as the change in the output voltage of the DAC as a result of change in the LSB at the input only. This could be defined as:
UIT SPRING 2016 38
If we are using an 8 bit DAC the resolution of the DAC in terms of the possible output states would be 28 = 256.
UIT SPRING 2016 39
Performance Parameters of DACs
Accuracy: It could be defined as the difference between the actual output voltage of the DAC and the expected
output. It is expressed in percentage. It must be ±1
2of
its LSB. For the full scale output of 10.2, and for an 8 bit DAC, it could be given as:
UIT SPRING 2016 40
Performance Parameters of DACs
Monotonicty: Good monotonicity means the converter is not missing any steps while stepping through its entire range.
Conversion Time: Also called the setting time. It is the time required for the conversion from application of the digital input to the generation of final analog output voltage.
Settling Time: Time required by the DAC to get settled to ±
1
2𝐋𝐒𝐁 of its final value for a given digital input voltage i.e
zero to full scale.
Stability: The performance of the converter changes with temperature, age and power supply variations. Hence the relevant parameters such as offset, gain, linearity, error and monotonicity must be within a certain limit during the entire operating range of temperature and supply fluctuations. This constitute to stability.
UIT SPRING 2016 41
Performance Parameters of DACs