Proposal for Identification of Crop Varieties

XXXXXBREAD WHEAT

(Triticum aestivum L.)

for Cultivation Conditions of XXXXX Zone

(Maharashtra and Karnataka under irrigated timely sown conditions)

Submitted to

Varietal identification CommitteeAICRP on Wheat and Barley

Name of proposing department and institute or University with

Logo

1

photograph

Field View of proposed bread wheat variety XXXXX

2

Proforma for Submission of Proposals for Identification of Crop Varieties/

Hybrids by Workshops

Indian Council of Agricultural Research

3

Insert a photograph of proposed variety in landscape

Field view photograph Field view photograph

XXXXXX: Some characteristic features

At heading stage Spike Spikelets

Lower glume Germ width and crease

1

photograph photograph photograph

photograph photograph photograph

Proposal for Identification of Wheat Variety XXXXXX for XXXXXXXXX conditions of XXXXXX Zone by Varietal Identification committee of AICRP on Wheat and Barley

1. Name of the crop and species : Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

2.a) Name of the variety

under which tested in AICRP trials

: XXXXX

b) Proposed name of the variety : XXXXX

3. Sponsored by (institute) : XXXXXXXXXXXXX4. a) Institution or agency

responsible for developing variety

: XXXXXXXXXXXX

b) Name of the person who helped in the development of the variety

:

A. Developers:Scientific StaffName Role/ContributionXXXX : XXXX

XXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXX

B. CollaboratorsXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXX

C. Technical Assistance in developmentXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXXXXXX : XXXX

5. a) Parentage (with details of its pedigree including source from which variety/ Inbred/A, B and R lines of hybrid has been developed)

: XXXX

b) Source of material in case of introduction : XXXX

c) DNA profile of variety/inbred/A, B, R line of hybrid vis à-vis check variety/ line

Please see Table No. 6

d) Breeding method used : Selection

e) Breeding objective : To develop high yielding bread wheat varieties with better quality attributes.

6. State the varieties which are most closely resemble the proposed variety in general characters

:Varieties Pl. Ht.

(cm)Earshape

Ear density

Grain shape

Grain hardness

XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

1

XXXXXX XX

XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

7.Recommended productions ecology (Rainfed/Irrigated; high/low fertility; season)

: XXXX

8.

Specific area of its adaptation (zones and states for which variety is proposed) and recommended productions ecology

: XXXX.

9. Description of variety :a) Plant height : XXXXb) Distinguishing

morphological characters : Please see attached varietal description Annexure I

c) Maturity (range in number of days) (from seedling/ transplanting to flowering, seed to seed)

:

Seed to flowering: XX days (Range: XX-XX days) Seed to seed: XX days (Range: XX-XX days)

Details in Table. No. 1.2d) Maturity group (early,

medium and late wherever such classification exists)

: XXXX

e) Reaction to major diseases under field and controlled conditions (reaction to physiological strains/ races/pathotypes/ bio-types to be indicated wherever possible )

:Bullet points describing disease reaction

Please see Table 3,3.1a,b,c and 3.2.

f) Reaction to major pests (under field and controlled)

:Bullet points describing pest reaction

Please see Table No. 4g) Agronomic features (e.g.

resistance to lodging, shattering, fertilizer responsiveness, suitability to early or late sown conditions, seed rate etc.)

:Bullet points describing agronomic performance

Please see Table No. 2 & 2.1

10. Quality of produce :

Grain quality : Bullet points describing quality performance

Please see Table No. 5 and 5.111. a) Yield data in coordinated

trials (breeding, agronomy, pathology, entomology, quality etc) regional/inter regional district trials year wise (levels of fertilizer application, density of plant population and superiority over local control/standard variety to

: Bullet points describing performance in yield trials in comparison to checks

2

be indicated (to be attached)

b) Yield data from national, demonstration/large scale demonstrations (to be attached)

: Not applicable

12. a) Agency responsible for maintaining breeder seed : XXXX

b) Quantity of breeder seed in stock (kg)

Variety:

XX quintals of breeder seed is available to meet all the requirements of seed chain.

13.

Specific recommendations, if any, for seed production (e.g. staggered sowing, plating ratio of parental lines of hybrids in foundation and certified seed production, probable area of seed production)

: There is no specific recommendation for seed production of XXXX.

14.Vivid presentation (field view, close-up of single plant and seed)

: Attached overleaf

15. Package of practices along with attainable yield levels : Please see Table No.7

16. Any other pertinent information : Briefly describe highlights of varietal performance in

comparison to check variety(s)

3

Signature of all contributors in development

(XXXX) (XXXX) (XXXX) (XXXX)

Proposed by

Sponsored by

(XXXXXXXX)Head of organization/Institute/University

Address

4

( XXXX)DesignationAddress

( XXXX)Head of departmentAddress

5

Checklist for Identification of Wheat Variety XXXXX for XXXXX condition of XXXXX Zone by Varietal Identification Committee of AICRP on Wheat and Barley, Year

Sl No. Details/document Attached

1. Parentage with details of its pedigree including source from which variety/Inbred/A, B and R lines of hybrid has been developed Yes No

2. Source of material in case of introduction (IC/EC numbers provided by NBPGR) Yes No

3. Flow chart of details of development of variety/ parental lines of hybrids NA

4. Molecular/ DNA profile of variety/hybrid/A, B, R line of hybrid vis-à-vis check variety/ line (details of unique amplicons that distinguishing markers along with photographs

Yes No

5. Detailed description of hybrid/variety Yes No

6. Detailed description of the parental lines of hybrid NA

7. Yield data and other data on diseases, insect-pest, quality etc. from coordinated trials Yes No

8. Yield data from national, demonstration/large scale demonstrations NA

9. Specific recommendations, if any, for seed production (e.g. staggered sowing, planting ratio of parental lines of hybrids in foundation and certified seed production, probable area of seed production etc.)

Yes No

10. Vivid presentation (field view, close-up of single plant and seed) with the help of photographs of the variety) Yes No

11. Package of practices Yes No

12. Proforma signed by all co-authors and Head of Organization Yes No

13. Any other pertinent information NA

Signature of Head of the Institution

6

Table 1. Summary yield data of Coordinated Varietal Trials

Name of the proposed variety : DBW168 Adaptability Zone : PZProduction conditions : Irrigated timely sown

Items Year of testing Trials

Proposed variety Check varieties

CD (0.05)

XXXX Check var1

Check var2

Check var3

Check var4

Yield (q/ha)

Year1 (name of trial) 5Year2 (AVT I) 11Year3 (AVT II) 10MeanWeighted mean

% Increase / decrease over checks

Year1 (name of trial)Year2 (AVT I)Year3 (AVT II)Over meanOver weighted mean

Frequency in 1st NS group

Year1 (name of trial)Year2 (AVT I)Year3 (AVT II)Total

7

Table 1.1: Yield data (q/h) of coordinated trials at individual locations

Name of the proposed variety : XXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXProduction conditions: XXXXX

Locations

Proposed variety Check Varieties CD

(5%)XXX Check var1

Check var2

Check var3

Check var4

NIVT- (trial Name & Year)Centre1Centre2..Centre nFrequency in 1st NSGAVT-I (trial Name & Year)Centre1Centre2........Centre nFrequency in 1st NSGAVT-II (trial Name & Year)Centre1Centre2.......Centre nFrequency in 1st NSG

Yield potential (q/ha)# indicates entry in 1st non-significant group

8

Table 1.2. Data on ancillary characters

Name of the proposed variety :

XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXX

Production conditions :

XXX

Year

Proposed variety Check Varieties

XXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4

Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean

Heading (days)

Year1

Year2

Year3

Mean

Maturity (days)

Year1

Year2

Year3

Mean

Plant height (cm)

Year1

Year2

Year3

Mean

1000-grain weight (g)

Year1

Year2

Year3

Mean

9

Table 2. Adaptability to Agronomic Variables

Name of the proposed variety :

XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX

Production conditions :

XXXXX

Experiment / Item Sowing Time

Proposed variety Check Varieties

XXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3

Check var4

Yield (q/ha)

Timely

Late

Mean

% gain/loss in yield with late sowing over timely sowing

% Increase / decrease over checks

Timely

Late

Over mean

CD (P=0.05):Sowing=1.05; Variety = 1.40; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time within Variety = NS

10

Table 2.1: Adaptability to agronomic variables

Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX

Experiment / Item Sowing Time

Proposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check

var3Check var4

Earheads/m2

Timely

Late

MeanCD (P=0.05):Sowing=6.04; Variety = NS; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time within Variety = NS

Number of Grains per spike

Timely

Late

MeanCD (P=0.05):Sowing=0.97; Variety = NS; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time

within Variety = NS

1000-Grain Weight (g)

Timely

Late

MeanCD (P=0.05):Sowing=0.47; Variety = 0.73; Variety within sowing time= NS, Sowing time within Variety = NS

11

Table 3: Reaction to major diseasesName of the proposed variety :

XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX

Production conditions :

XXXXX

Disease Year

Proposed variety Check Varieties

XXXXX Check var1

Check var2

Check var3

Check var4

HS ACI HS ACI HS ACI HS ACI HS ACIYellow Rust

Natural condition

Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI

Artificial condition

Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI

Brown Rust

Natural condition

Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI

Artificial condition

Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI

Stem Rust

Natural condition

Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI

Artificial condition

Year1Year2Year3Highest Score & Mean ACI

HS = Highest score, ACI = Average coefficient of infection, ND- Not developed

12

Table 3.1: APR response to rust pathotypes and AUDPC values

Name of the proposed variety :

XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX

Production conditions : XXXXX

Disease Pathotype Location

Proposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4

Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3

Yellow rust

APR ResponseCentre1Centre2..Centre n

AUDPC Values  Centre

Brown rust

APR ResponseCentre1Centre2Centre3Centre1Centre2Centre3

AUDPC Values  Centre

Black (Stem) rust

APR ResponseCentre1Centre2Centre3Centre1Centre2

13

Centre3AUDPC Values

  Centre

14

Table 3.1a: SRT Data on Yellow/Leaf/Stem (Black)/ rust (Flowedale/mahabaleshwar)

Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX

PathotypeXXXXXCheck var1Check var2Check var3Check var4

Table 3.1b: SRT Data on Yellow/Leaf/Stem (Black)/ rust (Flowedale/mahabaleshwar)

PathotypeXXXXXCheck var1Check var2Check var3Check var4

Table 3.1c. Gene Postulation based on SRT data

DiseaseProposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4

Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3 Year2 Year3Yellow RustBlack RustBrown Rust

15

Table 3.2: Reaction to other diseases

Name of the proposed variety :

XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX

Production conditions :

XXXXX

Disease Year

Proposed variety Check Varieties

XXXXX Check var1

Check var2

Check var3

Check var4

HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av

Karnal Bunt

Year2

Year2

Mean

Leaf Blight (dd)

Year2

Year2

Mean

FHB or Head Scab (0-5)

Year2

Year2

Mean

Powdery Mildew (0-9)

Year2

Year2

Mean

Flag Smut (%)

Year2

Year2

Mean

Foot Rot (%)

Year2

Year2

Mean

Loose Smut (%)Year2

Year3

HS = Highest score, AV = Average score

16

Table 4: Reaction to insect pests

Name of the proposed variety :

XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX

Production conditions :

XXXXX

Disease Year

Proposed variety Check Varieties

XXXXX Check var1

Check var2

Check var3

Check var4

HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av HS Av

Shoot fly incidence (%)

Year2

Year2

Mean

Brown wheat mite(no. of mites/10cm2 area)

Year2

Year2

Mean

Wheat aphid (Score 1-5)

Year2

Year2

Mean

Root aphid (Score 1-5)

Year2

Year2

MeanHS = Highest score, AV = Average score

17

Table 5: Data on important quality characteristics

Name of the proposed variety :

XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXX

Production conditions :

XXXXX

Grain characteristics

YearProposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check

var2Check var3 Check var4

Protein (%)

Year1Year2

Year3

Mean

Grain appearance (max score 10)

Year1Year2

Year3

Mean

Hectolitre weight (kg/hl)

Year1Year2

Year3

Mean

Sedimentation value (ml)

Year1Year2

Year3

Mean

Grain Hardness index

Year1Year2

Year3

Mean

18

Table 5.1: Data on other quality characteristics

Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX

Chapati, bread and biscuit quality

YearProposed variety Check Varieties

XXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4Chapati, bread and biscuit quality

Chapati quality (max score 10)Bread loaf volume (ml)Bread quality (max score 10)Extraction rate (%)Biscuit spread factorDry gluten (%)Wet gluten (%)Gluten index (%)Phenol test (max score 10) Nutritional qualityYellow pigment (ppm)Fe (ppm)Zn (ppm)

High molecular weight glutenin subunits

YearProposed variety Check VarietiesXXXXX Check var1 Check var2 Check var3 Check var4

HMW subunitsGlu-D1Glu-A1Glu-B1Glu-1 Score

19

Table 6: Marker profile generated using selected set of STS / ASPCR markers.

Name of the proposed variety : XXXXX Adaptability Zone : XXXXXProduction conditions : XXXXX

GenotypesMarkers

Rhtb VP1B3A Wxb1A Vrn-

1aVrnA1b

R1VrnA1b

R2Ppd-D1 PPO33 DuPw004 Lr10 Lr34228 414 290 481 A B

XXXXXCheck var1Check var2Check var3Check var4

20

Figure 1. Dendrogram showing relative diversity of genotypes under the Advanced Varietal Trial (second year entries and checks)

21

Paste the Dendrogram showing relative diversity of genotypes under the Advanced Varietal Trial here

Figure 2. Flow chart of details of development of bread wheat variety DBW168

22

Paste the pedigree flow chart of your variety here

Table: 7. Package of practices along with attainable yield levels.

1. Suitability of the variety for the area:

2. Selection of field and/land preparation:

3. Seed treatment:4. Sowing time:5. Seed rate/sowing

method:6. Fertilizer doses:7. Weed control:

8. Pest and Disease control :

9. Irrigation:10. Harvesting:11. Quality: 12. Mean Yield:13. Potential Yield:

23

Annexure IXXXXX

Varietal Description (Based on DUS descriptors)

1. Coleoptile (Anthocyanin pigmentation) :2. Growth habit :3. Foliage colour (Boot stage) :4. Flag leaf

1. Attitude :2. Anthocyanin pigmentation of auricles :3. Hairs on auricles :4. Waxiness of sheath :5. Waxiness of blade :6. Length :7. Width :

5. Culm: waxiness of peduncle :6. Average heading days (75% ears emerge) :7. Average maturity days (75% ears turn yellow) :8. Plant height (excluding awns) :9. Ears

a. Waxiness :b. Shape in profile :c. Density :d. Length excluding awns :e. Colour :

10. Awns or scurs a. Presence :b. Length :c. Colour :d. Altitude :

11. Outer glume pubescence :12. Lower glume

a. Shoulder width :b. Shoulder shape :c. Beak length :d. Beak shape :

13. Peduncle a. Length :b. Attitude :

14. Grain a. Colour :b. Shape :c. Germ width :d. Crease :e. Brush hair :f. Hardness :g. 1000-grains weight :

15. Any other special feature(s) :

24