Web v snative(engl)

12
Engineering Performance 1 Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision Engineering Performance

description

These slides compare the economical benefits of web and native mobile apps

Transcript of Web v snative(engl)

Page 1: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 1Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

Engineering

Performance

Page 2: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 2Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

Web vs. Native © Apple

© Apple

© Lenovo

Page 3: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 3Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

+ Working regardless of location

+ Customer service on site

+ Reduction of standby time

+ Easy data management

Mobile Business

Page 4: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 4Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

© Apple

Mobile Application

Native Apps

Classic App

Distribution: App-Stores

Web Apps

Browser based

Platform independent

Page 5: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 5Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

Top Smartphone Operation System

51,5%41,8%

3%3%

Android

iOS

BlackBerry

Microsoft

© comScore. Inc 2014 March

Page 6: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 6Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

Bild durch Klicken auf Symbol hinzufügen Bild durch Klicken auf Symbol hinzufügen

Comparison

Web App Native App

+ Deployment

+ Development costs

+ Running costs

+ Range of function

Page 7: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 7Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

+ Can be integrated in existing webserver and -architectures

+ Easy know-how-transfer

+ Standard monitoring with Piwik or Google Analytics possible

+ Dependance on mobile platform

+ Products have to be bought through the App-Stores

Deployment

Web App Native App

Page 8: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 8Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

+ Java Script as crossplattformprogram language

+ Independent publishing

+ Tests for compatibility for the different platforms and devices are necessary

+ Wide range of tools

+ Rising cost through different platforms and device developements

+ Restriction of the App-Stores have to be regarded

Development Costs

Web App Native App

Page 9: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 9Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

+ One central update

+ Quick bug gixing

+ Low-priced hardware

+ Specialized DIE reduces the workload

+ Different platform technologies rquire a wide range of know how for maintaining

+ Speicific updates for eachdifferent platform anddevice

Running Costs

€€

€€

Web App Native App

Page 10: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 10Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

+ Offline use with App-Cacheand LocalStorage possible

+ Gesture control throughHTML5, CSS3 and Java

+ Hardware-Integration: sensors, camera and othersthrough frameworks likePhoneGap

+ Offline use possible throughaccess to the device memory

+ Better application performance

+ Access to the hardware of the terminal

Range of Function

Web App Native App

Page 11: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 11Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

Web Application Optimal performance for businesses

Adaptable to change

Versatile, easy, affordable

Fazit

Page 12: Web v snative(engl)

Engineering Performance 12Mobile Enterprise Application Comparision

Firmenzentrale

InMediasP GmbH

Neuendorfstraße 18a

16761 Hennigsdorf

www.inmediasp.de

[email protected]

Vielen Dank.

Ansprechpartner

Thomas Hein ([email protected])

Lutz Andersch([email protected])