Dispositional and Organizational Influences on Sustained ...
“Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on...
-
Upload
west-virginia-university-department-of-communication-studies -
Category
Education
-
view
95 -
download
3
description
Transcript of “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on...
![Page 1: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Interaction Lab
(#ixlab)
“WEB-SLING TO SAVE OR SHOOT TO KILL?”
Bowman · Roman Knoster · Sanders
![Page 2: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ABSTRACT
The current study explores the impact of dissonant origininformation (information about character origin that countersaudiences’ prior knowledge) on dispositional shift (movementfrom more to less extreme judgments). In a 2 (action: pro- oranti-social) x 2 (outcome: rewarded or punished) x 2(canonical/control or dissonant origin) between-subjectsexperimental design, participants receiving dissonant originexperienced greater dispositional polarization (that is,dramatic shift) – from extreme positive to extreme negativejudgments; these effects intensified when the character’sactions were anti-social.
![Page 3: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
BACKGROUND
• Morally ambiguous characters possess traits spanning the good/evil “dichotomy”
• Origin stories set the anchor for this assessment
![Page 4: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
BACKGROUND“It is in the expositionthat audiences are given the origin story of a character, and this origin often serves as the cognitive and affective anchor by which we weigh a character’s subsequent actions”
(Raney, 2003).
![Page 5: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
BACKGROUND
Origin Stories
Espoused origins provide the moral lenses for …
Character dispositions
…our initial assessments of a character …
Character actions
…and contextualize how we accept or reject a character’s actions (regardless of this action’s “objective” valence)
Origins provide the anchor for character
impression formation (Sanders, 2010)
![Page 6: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
BACKGROUND
The Comics Code Authority lead to
the “great Silvering” of gritty
heroes such as Batman.
![Page 7: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
HYPOTHESIS
• (H1) The presentation of dissonant origin information will lessen the degree to which audiences are affectively polarized toward characters.
• (H2) Moral evaluations of characters and their behaviors will mediate the relationship between origin stories and affective polarization.
• An increase in good/evil polarization will be associated with– (H3a) lower feelings of eudaimonic appreciation
– (H3b) higher feelings of hedonic enjoyment.
Good
“Meh”
Evil
![Page 8: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
METHOD
• N = 292 for a “story on superheroes”
– (52% male, age M = 29.51, 30% comic fans)
Your random* character is: Spider-Man
The pages you’re about to read are still “in progress” so you’ll notice that
the art and storyline are still a bit rough – this is completely normal as
artists and writers will often tweak their products after getting feedback
from readers. Please pay close attention to the developing storyline, and
we’ll ask you about your thoughts once you’ve had a chance to read
them. There should be five total draft comic book pages.
*participants completed knowledge
test on six super-heroes (foil)
![Page 9: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
METHOD
• Five-page comics
created w/ existing
Spider-Man art
Sample “good” action
![Page 10: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
METHOD
• Spider-Man either
rewarded or punished
for his actions…
“Punishment”
“Reward”
• …and directly (“bad”)
or indirectly (“control”)
killed his Uncle Ben
![Page 11: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
METHOD
• Measures– Character disposition (-2 to +2)
• Avg shift from 1.02 to -0.19; dispositional shift of M = -1.20
– Character knowledge (six-point) • all but n = 11 knew Spider-Man’s origin
– Character morality (six-point) • Raney (2004); M = 2.93, SD = 1.11
– Enjoyment & appreciation• Oliver and Raney (2011): enjoyment M = 2.93 (SD = .86),
appreciation M = 2.76 (SD = .88)
![Page 12: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
RESULTS: H1
• Dissonant origins should reduce polarization;
not supported
– Largest shift for “bad action, bad/good
outcome, dissonant origin” (M ~ 1.90)
– Least shift for “good action, bad/good
outcome, control origin” (M ~ .50)
![Page 13: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
RESULTS: H2
Dissonant Origin
-.240Character Morality
.486 Polarization
“Good Action” narratives:
? ?Character Morality
.376 Polarization
Bad Action” narratives
![Page 14: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
RESULTS: H3
• Greater
polarization was
associated with
higher enjoyment
(H3a, R2 = .225)
![Page 15: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
DISCUSSION
• “At least for the writers of such a popular superhero as Spider-Man, the current study suggests that when it comes to cherished heroes, “with great popularity, comes great responsibility.” Providing a dissonant anti-hero origin might be expected to give audiences more to contemplate, but the current study suggests that the introduction of intense dissonance might well result in a rejection of the hero label in favor for the villain one. In a way, the anti-hero exists in a precarious valley in between the heroic and the villainous – in between the web-slinger and the gun-slinger.”
![Page 16: “Web-sling to save or shoot to kill?” The impact of dissonant origin and antiheroic action on dispositional polarization and enjoyment](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052316/559738831a28abb9768b467a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Nick Bowman, Ph.D. [CV]
Twitter (@bowmanspartan)
Skype (nicholasdbowman)
http://comm.wvu.edu
/fs/research/lab
Interaction Lab
(#ixlab)