Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007
-
Upload
bryan-alexander -
Category
Technology
-
view
108 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007
![Page 1: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Web 2.0, teaching, and learning: early 2007
![Page 2: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Plan of the talk
1. Web 2.0 in early 2007
2. Web 2.0 and rich media
3. Pedagogies
4. Web 2.0 storytelling
(Middlebury waterfall, spring 2006)
![Page 3: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Thematics
• Emergence in
time and space
• Pedagogy
• Dynamic information ecology
(Radio Open Source blog/podcast, 2006)
![Page 4: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
One metaphor
Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: awareness is challenging
• Huge, financially and quantitatively successful worlds
• Global and rapidly developing• Bad anxieties, policies, and media
coverage• Perceived lack of seriousness
![Page 5: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
One metaphor
Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: intersections are possible
• Take advantage of preexisting projects
• Mod/warp/hack
• DIY
• Literacy: IF/audience
![Page 6: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
The term’s history: Tim O’Reilly, 2005
• Expands “social software”
• Draws on Web history
![Page 7: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Microcontent, rather than sites or large documents
(Gliffy.com)
![Page 8: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
• Multiply authored microcontent, rather than sites or large documents
![Page 9: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
• Open content and/or services and/or standards
(Pepysblog, 2003-)
![Page 10: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Open microcontent + multiple authors = network constructivism
(Pepysblog, 2003-)
![Page 11: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Data mashups
Flickr
+
Google Maps
![Page 12: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Perpetual beta (O’Reilly, now history)
Geo-tagging in Flickr
![Page 13: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
• AJAX-based? Also Flash
![Page 14: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
• O’Reilly: platforms for development
![Page 15: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Web 2.0 components, movements• Collaborative writing platforms: the wiki way
![Page 16: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Research: wikis are textually productive
-Viégas, Wattenberg, Dave (IBM, 2004)
![Page 17: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
I. Web 2.0News-gathering: wikis are textually productive
(OhMyNews! , WikiNews)
![Page 18: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Web 2.0 components, movements• collaborative writing platforms: the blogosphere
![Page 19: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
• Addressable content chunks
![Page 20: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
• Distributed and/or attached conversations
![Page 21: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
State of the blogosphere• 70 million blogs tracked by Technorati:
“Technorati is now tracking over 70 million weblogs, and we're seeing about 120,000 new weblogs being created worldwide each day. That's about 1.4 blogs created every second of every day.”
(David Sifry, April 2007)
Chart follows…
![Page 22: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
![Page 23: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
State of the blogosphere, more
• 12 people million using three platforms, including LiveJournal: majority women (Anil Dash, MeshForum 2006)
• Diversity: diaries, public intellectuals, carnivals, knitters, moblogs, warblogs home and abroad…
![Page 24: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Web 2.0 components, movements: social objects
http://flickr.com/
•Photo sharing:
Flickr
![Page 25: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Reach of Flickr• 100 million images, as of Feb 2006• As of October 2006, 4 million Flickr
members (3/4 not in the US)• 1 million photos uploaded each day
(http://www.radioopensource.org/photography-20/
)
![Page 26: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Reach of Flickr• 26 million
searchable, shareable images in Flickr (December 2006)
• Metadata is good enough
• Gaming inspiration
(Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)
![Page 27: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Web 2.0 enables the Web office
• Example: Google Spreadsheets
http://spreadsheets.google.com/
![Page 28: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
What can we learn from this? Ton Zylstra:
“In general you could say that both Flickr and delicious work in a triangle: person, picture/bookmark, and tag(s). Or more abstract a person, an object of sociality, and some descriptor...”
![Page 29: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
“…In every triangle there always needs to be a person and an object of sociality. The third point of the triangle is free to define[,] as it were.”
-http://www.zylstra.org, 2006(emphases added)
![Page 30: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
What can we learn from this?Jyri Engesrom is succinct: “The fallacy is to think that social
networks are just made up of people. They're not; social networks consist of people who are connected by a shared object.”
-http://www.zengestrom.com/, 2005
![Page 31: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Social object principles: tagging
Flickr is one influential and leading tagging project
![Page 32: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
“Home
Owain
Hestia
Chickens
Ripton”
![Page 33: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Folksonomy
User benefit
• Search
• Retrieval
• Self-awareness
http://del.icio.us/
for DoctorNemo
![Page 34: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Community surfacing• Ontology
• Concepts • Collaborative research
![Page 35: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Case study, tagging museums:
the Steve project
![Page 36: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Tagging museums: the Steve project
• Expert discourse, controlled vocab
![Page 37: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Tagging museums: the Steve project
• Users tag differently• Curators get it
(Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2004)
![Page 38: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Tagging libraries: PennTags
• Coded locally
• Also tags the open web
http://tags.library.upenn.edu/
![Page 39: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Components, movements
• Mixing and mashing:
the RSS feed
![Page 40: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
-Alex Iskold, The Read/Write Web, April 2007
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_rss.php
“RSS is basically a filtered push - the user subscribes (pulls in) to channels that he/she likes, and after that content is delivered automatically.”
![Page 41: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Social object: the person
• MySpace
• ZoomInfo
• CyWorld
“Less than four years after its launch, 15 million people, or almost a third of the country's population, are members.” (BusinessWeek, September 2005)
![Page 42: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
I. Web 2.0
Social news:
• Memeorandum, Tailrank, Digg, TechMeme
![Page 43: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
Web 2.0 influences rich media
• Podcasting
![Page 44: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
How old is the term? “With the benefit of hindsight, it all seems
quite obvious. MP3 players, like Apple's iPod, in many pockets, audio production software cheap or free, and weblogging an established part of the internet…”
![Page 45: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
How old is the term? “… all the ingredients are there for a new boom in amateur radio.
But what to call it? Audioblogging? Podcasting? GuerillaMedia?”
(Ben Hammersley, The Guardian
February 12, 2004)
![Page 46: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
What’s happened since February 2004?
![Page 47: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
What’s happened since?
“More than 22 million American adults own iPods or MP3 players and 29% of them have downloaded podcasts from the Web so that they could listen to audio files at a time of their choosing.”
-Pew Internet and American Life study,April 2005
![Page 48: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
What’s happened since “podcasting” in 2001? Neologisms:
• godcasting
• nanocasting
• podfading
• podsafe
• podspamming
• podvertising• porncasting
![Page 49: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
Web 2.0 influences rich media: audio
Freesound archive•DIY copyright•Social networking values
http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/
![Page 50: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
Web 2.0 influences rich media: video
(Gootube? Suetube?)
![Page 51: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
Videoblogging
(vlog?
vog?)
(Rocketboom, Amanda Congdon)(already moved on)
![Page 52: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
II. Rich media and Web 2.0
(Second Life, 2004-present)
Web 2.0 influences rich media: social gaming and Web 2.0?
![Page 53: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: it’s not all new
Web 1.0, internet pedagogies
• Hypertext
• Web audience
• Discussion for a
• Collaborative document authoring
• Groupware
![Page 54: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: it’s not all new
Earlier pedagogies
• Journaling
• Media literacy
![Page 55: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: CMS involvement
• Moodle modules
![Page 56: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: Blackboard Beyond“Chief Executive Officer Michael Chasen...
explained, "Just as the Web 2.0 is facilitating a change in the way people interact online, e-Learning 2.0 represents a transformational shift for how the Internet can improve education. Blackboard is excited to work with our clients to help shape and accelerate this transformation.“”
![Page 57: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: Blackboard Beyond
(Kevin Creamer, March 10 2006)
![Page 58: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: principles
• Distributed
conversation
• Collaborative
writing
• Object-oriented
discussion
http://smarthistory.blogspot.com/
![Page 59: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: more principles
• Ease of entry
• Personalization
![Page 60: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: “net.gen”:“[S]tudents… write words on paper, yes— but…
also compose words and images and create audio files on Web logs (blogs), in word processors, with video editors and Web editors and in e-mail and on presentation software and in instant messaging and on listservs and on bulletin boards—and no doubt in whatever genre will emerge in the next ten minutes.
Note that no one is making anyone do any of this writing.”
Kathleen Blake Yancey, "Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key." CCC 56.2 (2004):297-328.
![Page 61: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: “net.gen”:
“Fully half of all teens and 57 percent of teens who use the Internet could be considered Content Creators, according to a survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project.”
http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/PIP_Teens_1105.pdf
![Page 62: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: “net.gen”:• “33 percent of online teens share their own
creative content online, such as artwork, photos, stories or videos.
• 32 percent say that they have created or worked on webpages or blogs for others, including groups they belong to, friends or school assignments.”
http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/PIP_Teens_1105.pdf
![Page 63: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: “net.gen”:• “22 percent report keeping their own
personal webpage. • 19 percent of online teens keep a blog,
and 38 percent of online teens read blogs. • 19 percent of Internet-using teens say they
remix content they find online into their own artistic creations.”
http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/PIP_Teens_1105.pdf
![Page 64: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: “net.gen”:“Teens are often much more enthusiastic
authors and readers of blogs than their adult counterparts. Teen bloggers, led by older girls, are a major part of this tech-savvy cohort.”
(Pew Internet and American Life,November 2005)
http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/PIP_Teens_1105.pdf
![Page 65: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Teaching with Web 2.0: blogging
• Distributed
conversation
• Collaborative
writing
• Object-oriented
discussion
![Page 66: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
University of British Columbia uses:• “as personal logs/ journals to keep track of
work/learning activities”
•as digital photo albums•as potential e-portfolio tools…”
![Page 67: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
“…Currently, UBC is using weblogs…:• as course web pages, encouraging discussion
and collaboration • as private management and communication tools for
large campus groups, administrative teams, and communities of practice
• to easily update online newsletters• to keep a collection of useful, searchable links”
(http://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/home/about.php)
![Page 68: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Blog problem: privacy• Contrary to class safe space (Gary Kornblith)• Culture of too much disclosure• Problem increasing archivally
Some responses• Can block comments and/or readers• Teachable moment: what is privacy in 2007?• Complement other practices
![Page 69: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Wiki pedagogies
• Collective research
• Group writing
• Document editing
• Information literacy
• Discussion
• Knowledge accretion
![Page 70: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Social object pedagogies• Prompts• Discussion object• Composition materials
![Page 71: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Social object pedagogies• Annotate details• Remix (“Make it mine”)
Edugadget
http://www.edugadget.com/2005/05/07/flickr-creative-commons
![Page 72: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
RSS pedagogies• Shaping Web reading• Pushing student-created content (mother
blog, Feed to Javascript)• Web 2.0 wrangling
![Page 73: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Podcasts and teaching: profcasting
• Bryn Mawr College: Michelle Francl, chemistry
• Duke: Classroom recording
• Learning objects: Gardner Campbell, University of Richmond
• Duke: Course content dissemination
• Information literacy
![Page 74: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Podcasts and research
• Public intellectual– Out of the Past– Engines of Our
Ingenuity – Napoleon 101– In Our Time
• Trudi Abel, “Digital Durham and the New South” (Duke University, 2006)
• Duke: Field recording
![Page 75: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
III. Pedagogies
Podcasts and research
• Public intellectual– Out of the Past– Engines of Our
Ingenuity – Napoleon 101– In Our Time
• Trudi Abel, “Digital Durham and the New South” (Duke University, 2006)
• Duke: Field recording
![Page 76: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
Web 2.0 storytelling
• Nonfiction (Pulse)
• Fiction (“I Found a Camera…”)
• ARGs
• Public intellectuals
![Page 77: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
Lonelygirl15
• One YouTube
• Another YouTube
• Myspace
• Blogs
• Discussion frenzy
• Media attention(2006-)
![Page 78: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
Flickr and storytelling
• Tell a story in 5 frames group
“Gender Miscommunication”(Nightingai1e, 2006)
![Page 79: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
![Page 80: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
![Page 81: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
![Page 82: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
“Gender Miscommunication” (Nightingai1e, 2006)
![Page 83: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
Flickr and storytelling
• In the Tell a story in 5 frames group, 'Alone With The Sand'
(moliere1331, 2005)
![Page 84: Web 2.0 and pedagogy overview, June 2007](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061223/54c669794a7959342b8b4618/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education http://nitle.org
NITLE blog http://b2e.nitle.org
NITLE Lab http://nitle.org/index.php/nitle/laboratory