WE EBI LL N G - WordPress.com · The DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12is the...
Transcript of WE EBI LL N G - WordPress.com · The DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12is the...
learning environment curriculum and pedagogy policies and procedures partnerships care and education settings family communityinquiry-minded improvement E m o t i o n a l dimensions of wellbeing learning environment curriculum and pedagogypolicies and procedures partnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement dimensions of
wellbeing learning environment curriculum and pedagogy policies and procedures partnerships P h y s i c a l care andeducation settings family community inquiry-minded improvement dimensions of wellbeing learning environment curriculum andpedagogy policies and procedures partnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvementdimensions of wellbeing learning environment C o g n i t i v e curriculum and pedagogy policies and procedurespartnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement dimensions of wellbeing learningenvironment curriculum and pedagogy policies and procedures partnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement dimensions of wellbeing learning environment curriculum and pedagogy policies and proceduresS o c i a l partnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement partnerships careand education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement dimensions of wellbeing learning environment curriculumand pedagogy policies and procedures partnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvementdimensions of wellbeing learning environment curriculum and pedagogy S p i r i t u a l policies and procedurespartnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement dimensions of wellbeing learningenvironment curriculum and pedagogy partnerships policies and procedures care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement curriculum and pedagogy policies and procedures partnerships care and education settings family communityinquiry-minded improvement dimensions of wellbeing learning environment curriculum and pedagogy policies and procedurespartnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-minded improvement dimensions of wellbeing learningenvironment curriculum and pedagogy policies and procedures partnerships care and education settings family community inquiry-
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework
f o r b i r t h t o y e a r 1 2
W E
E B I
L L N G
ContentsIntroduction 3
Rationale 3
Purpose 3
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12 4
Dimensions of wellbeing 5
Influences on wellbeing 6
Domains of practice 7
What is inquiry? 8
Why inquire? 8
What are the implications for practice? 10
What are the links to South Australian Curriculum Standards and Accountability
(SACSA) Framework? 12
Connections and coherence 12
How do we know we are making a difference? 13
References 14
AcknowledgmentsThe DECS Learner Wellbeing Project Steering Committee comprised of:
Sherry Thompson, Executive Director, Early Childhood and Statewide Services
Sherylee Dawe, Manager, Learner Wellbeing Project
Helen Wildash, Director, Learning Improvement and Support Services
Italia Parletta, Lecturer, Early Childhood, TAFE SA
Julienne Muirhead, Director, Warradale Kindergarten
Steve Adams, Principal, Mitcham Primary School
Paul Wilson, Principal, Christies Beach High School
Greg Petherick, Director, East District
Alan Green, Director, Accountability and Strategic Futures
David Rathman, Executive Director, Aboriginal Education and Employment Strategies
Margot Foster, Manager, Learning to Learn Project
Sue Weir, Student Inclusion and Wellbeing Manager, Riverland District.
The invaluable contribution is acknowledged of the following groups to the development of the DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework
for birth to year 12:
Learner Wellbeing Project Matrix Team
Learner Wellbeing Project Reference Committee
DECS District Student Inclusion and Wellbeing Managers
Learner Wellbeing Project Critical Friends and
2006 Learner Wellbeing Project Inquiry Sites (see website for complete lists of members).
Particular thanks to the Learner Wellbeing Project Team:
Victoria Buchanan
Gaynor Quinn
Inara Gehling
Robyn O’Dea
Jan Warren
Brenda Hosking-Brown.
Through the input of all these groups, across all levels of DECS, including learners, parents and agency partners, the DECS Learner
Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12 is both theoretically sound and grounded in practice.
>
indicates that further information is available on the Learner Wellbeing website:
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingprojectW
Inquiryquestions from sites
Quotefrom
literaturereview
Findingsfrom sites
Every attempt has been made to tracethe copyright holders. If you have anyinformation, please contact the DECSLearner Wellbeing Manager.
National Library of Australia
Cataloguing-in-Publication entry:
DECS learner wellbeing framework for birth to year 12.
Bibliography.
ISBN 9781921233043.
ISBN 1 921233 04 4.
1. Students - Health and hygiene -South Australia. 2. Students - Mentalhealth - South Australia. I. SouthAustralia. Dept. of Education andChildren’s Services.
371.71099423
© 2007, The State of South Australia,Department of Education andChildren’s Services
Produced by Office of Early Childhoodand Statewide Services, Level 5, 31 Flinders Street, Adelaide, SA
Edited by Infoquest Pty LtdDesigned by She Creative Pty LtdPrinted by fivestargrafex
ISBN 978 1 921233 04 31 921233 04 4
R4929/2
The DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12 is the
outcome of an extended inquiry, involving sites, Central and District
offices and partners, including families, other agencies and experts.
A forum for leaders was held in 2004 to generate views about a framework for learner wellbeing and a working
paper entitled Wellbeing is central to Learning (DECS 2005a) was then developed by the DECS Learner Wellbeing
Matrix Team for broad circulation in 2005. Responses to the working paper were used to construct a draft
framework, entitled Towards a Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12 (DECS 2006). During
2006, 53 sites and clusters of sites used the draft to guide their own inquiries into a locally relevant
aspect of learner wellbeing.
This framework is a summary of current knowledge about learner wellbeing that is strongly
grounded in local practice. It has been developed to support sites from child care to senior
secondary schools to take an inquiry-minded approach to the improvement of wellbeing for
all learners, beginning with a particular focus in Site Learning Plans in 2007.
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
3
Introduction>
The strong and mutual interconnection between wellbeing and learning has meant that learner wellbeing has
always been an integral part of educators’ work. The influence of continuous and rapid change upon today’s
learners and the consequent complexity of their lives require educators to inquire into new ways of working that
support the wellbeing and learning connection. The DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework supports educators
to build upon and improve on current effective practice through the use of an inquiry approach.
Consistent with the Declaration of the Rights of the Child (United Nations 1959) and the Adelaide Declaration
on National Goals for Schooling in the Twenty-first Century (MCEETYA 1999), the DECS Statement of
Directions 2005–2010 (2005b) identifies wellbeing and learner engagement as key directions for educators:
‘Staff in all sites…play an important role in fostering engagement and wellbeing so that each child and student
is able to achieve their best and enjoy their educational experience’ (p. 8).
One target in the DECS Statement of Directions, under Goal 3: Wellbeing and engagement, is to ‘develop and
implement a Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12 by the end of 2007’ (p. 8).
Rationale
>
The DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework is designed to support the development and improvement of the
wellbeing of all learners by:
• promoting a common understanding, consistent approaches and shared commitment to the development
of learner wellbeing
• providing a strategic framework that connects and makes coherent a range of initiatives, projects, policies
and practices, including the South Australian Curriculum Standards and Accountability (SACSA) Framework
(DETE 2001)
• providing a tool that can be used to map, audit and strengthen site and educator capacity to support
and improve the wellbeing of all learners
• encouraging the participation in an inquiry approach to the improvement of learner wellbeing of all site
community members: leaders, educators, learners, parents and other partners
• assisting sites to identify learners whose wellbeing may be at risk and allocating appropriate support
• promoting collaborative and cross-agency pathways of support to improve wellbeing.
Purpose
>
W
Educators
All people working with
children and students
in care and education
settings.
Families
includes parents, care-
givers and extended
family members.
Framework
An overarching policy
direction; a blend of
principles, beliefs and
policies that broadly
set the boundaries for
consistent and appro-
priate action at all levels.
Learners
Children and students
from newborns to adults
re-entering education.
While educators are also
learners, the focus of this
Framework is on children
and students.
Principles• Wellbeing is central to learning and learning is central to wellbeing.
• Educators make a positive contribution to learner wellbeing.
• Wellbeing is built on the strengths of individuals, groups andcommunities working together.
Wellbeing is integral to the learning process. A learner will engage readily with learning when in an optimum
state of wellbeing. There are learned skills, abilities and understandings important to the development of
wellbeing, for example:
Gaining the ability to understand our own emotions and using it to shape our own actions are competencies
that are not only essential for our mental and emotional health: they are meta-abilities that are highly linked
to school and career success (Goleman, cited in Weare 2000, p. 69).
The DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12, as illustrated, shows the dimensions of wellbeing
within a care or education setting. An inquiry-minded approach links care and education practices to the
wellbeing of learners. This approach enables sites to improve their practices to enhance learner wellbeing.
Figure 1: DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
Wellbeing can be characterised in the following ways:
• Wellbeing is dynamic and changeable.
• Wellbeing may be enacted differently in different cultures.
• Wellbeing is about feeling well and functioning well.
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
4
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
Wellbeing is…a holistic
subjective state which is present
when a range of feelings, among
them energy, confidence, openness,
enjoyment, happiness, calm, and
caring, are combined and balanced.
(Stewart-Brown in Roberts2005, p. 6)
How do weincrease children’s
level of involvement orengagement in the curriculum
to increase their emotionalwellbeing?
Newland Park
Kindergarten
Wellbeing…is used
loosely to imply a
generalised state of feeling
valued, socially, emotionally,
intellectually and, eventually,
economically.
(Gammage 2004, p. 2)
>
Child wellbeing
is more than the
absence of problems.
(Pollard & Davidson 2001, p. 13)
Wellbeing provided us with a clearer focus
and an ‘umbrellaproject’ that drew
in all of the differentprograms in a
coordinated andarticulate way…
providing a paradigmfor other initiatives.
Burra Community School
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
5
Dimensions of wellbeingIn this framework there are five dimensions to wellbeing that overlap and interconnect with each
other: cognitive, emotional, physical, social and spiritual. Collectively these dimensions provide
learners with resilience and confidence in their ability to influence their world. In their work on
the foundations of wellbeing for UNESCO, Pollard and Davidson (2001) expand on some of the
dimensions and their various aspects.
Figure 2: Dimensions of wellbeing
• Cognitive aspects include information processing, memory, curiosity, mastery, motivation, persistence,
thinking and intelligence.
• Emotional aspects are closely linked with social aspects and include emotional development and control,
coping, autonomy, positive self-development, trust and attachment.
• Physical aspects include nutrition, physical activity, physical safety, preventive health care, reproductive
health and substance abuse.
• Social aspects include parent-child relationships, sibling relationships, peer relationships, positive social
behaviour, empathy and sympathy.
• Spiritual aspects include beliefs, values, morals and ethics; a sense of meaning and purpose; altruism;
and a sense of connectedness to something larger than oneself.
Mental health is
another term for the social
and emotional aspects of
wellbeing—it refers to our
thoughts, feelings, behaviour
and relationships (Hunter Institute of Mental
Health 2006)
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
The Framework enabledus to look at our inquiryquestion while keeping
all dimensions ofwellbeing in view.
It served as a goodcheckpoint.
Nuriootpa Primary School
Influences on wellbeingAll children and students have the potential for high levels of wellbeing. The broader environmental context
contains a range of factors which influence wellbeing for each individual. These factors are either protective
or risk factors and the dynamic relationship between them means their impact will vary for each individual.
Educators have the greatest potential to positively influence the range of factors within care and education.
Figure 3: Influences on wellbeing
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
6
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
Whatmethodologies and
literacy practices bestsupport learning achievementsfor humanitarian refugees from
different parts of Africa?
Woodville
High School
How doespedagogy influence
the wellbeing of children who are ESL and/or
Indigenous students frombirth–8 years?
Sturt Street Community
School
Care andeducationsettings
Protective factors Risk factors
Poor connection to the setting
Bullying
Peer rejection
Failure
Anti-social peer group
Ineffective behaviourmanagement
Positive relationships witheducators and peers
Feeling safe
Engaging curriculum
Feeling connected
Belonging
Positive climate
Pro-social peer group
Responsibility andrequired helpfulness
Opportunities for success
Recognition ofachievement
Sense of control of learning
Feeling competent
Meaningful pathwaysthrough and beyondschooling
Our parents, through our genes and our upbringing, influence
about 50% of the variation in happiness between people.
Our circumstances, which include our income, as well
as other external factors such as climate and where
we live, account for only 10%.
Our outlook and activities, like our friendships,
being involved in our community, sport and
hobbies, as well as our attitude to life, account
for the remaining 40%. This is where we have the
most opportunity to make a difference to wellbeing.
(Shah & Marks 2004, p. 2)
(Adapted from National Crime
Prevention 1999, pp. 136 & 138)
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
7
Examples of individual characteristics identified as risk factors include low birth weight, disability,
and low self esteem, but protective factors include attachment to family, and social and intellectual
competence. Risk factors associated with family include young maternal age, abuse, and lack of
warmth and affection, while protective factors are supportive, caring parents, responsibility for
chores or required helpfulness, and family harmony. Community risk factors include socio-economic
disadvantage, social or cultural discrimination, war or natural disasters, and population density and
housing conditions. Community protective factors include access to support services, a strong cultural
identity, and community norms against violence (National Crime Australia, 1999).
Domains of practiceThe dimensions of wellbeing need to be considered in the context of four domains within the site or service
as a whole. The learning environment, curriculum and pedagogy, partnerships, and policies and procedures
interact and are interdependent. What is learned through the curriculum will be practised in the learning
environment, supported by partnerships with family and other agencies, and made explicit in the policies
and practices of the site.
Figure 4: Domains of practice in care and education settings
When we develop a common understanding
of what an emotionally safe learning environment
is, will that lead to changes in pedagogy?
Kimba Area
School
What changes do we expect to
see from teaching about respect and
anti-bullying?
Allendale East
Area School
• Learning environment: the ethos/culture of a site or service and the aesthetics, infrastructure and
physical environment
• Curriculum and pedagogy: the twin processes of teaching and learning, which create involvement
and success
• Partnerships: the numerous relationships that need to exist to support learners and their learning within
and between sites, services, families, agencies and community members
• Policies and procedures: system and local statements and directions on significant issues that affect
learner wellbeing, such as how particular situations will be managed and which values are promoted.
It is most effective to take a whole of site or service approach. This approach acknowledges that everything
has the potential to influence wellbeing and, within any site, it is important that attention be paid to each of
the four domains.
The inquiry process has enabled sites
to develop their ownpathways, seek
answers or direction to their own questions,and tailor their work inthe field of wellbeing tomeet the needs of their
entire community.
Student inclusion and
wellbeing manager
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
Why inquire?Using a rigorous inquiry approach allows educators to reflect deeply on learner wellbeing as a component
of a continuous improvement cycle. This facilitates learning sites to develop strategies to respond to specific
local circumstances.
There are a variety of inquiry models to assist and facilitate:
• identification of an area of focus
• formulation of an initial inquiry question
• translation into an inquiry cycle
• refinement of the initial inquiry question if needed.
Each step requires dialogue and documentation leading to consensus.
A culture of inquiry allows site reflection, which both affirms existing good practice and highlights dimensions
and domains of practice that need improvement. To build a culture of inquiry, educators need to scrutinise
their practices and their impact on learner wellbeing. Inquiry can be messy and confronting, but can lead to
new learnings, insights and new questions: time spent by educators inquiring together, building on strengths,
being willing to take risks, being open to new ideas and change, also ensures improvements will be
significant and sustainable. This approach supports educator wellbeing.
Inquiry-minded improvement recognises that each site has specific issues relevant to their context.
It is a process of continuous improvement involving each educator’s commitment to:
• Reflect, by examining one’s work to challenge familiar ways of viewing issues
• Question, by gathering data, mapping current practice, making connections and
sorting out thinking
• Plan, by utilising data to make informed decisions and demonstrate change
• Act based on reflection, questioning and planning.
8
What is inquiry?
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
>Inquiry is a process
of systematic, rigorous and
critical reflection about professional
practice, and the contexts in which
it occurs, in ways that question
taken-for-granted assumptions.
(Reid 2004, p. 4)
Inquiry…is a fancy
way of saying let’s study
what’s happening at our school
and make it a better, more
equitable, place.
(Bay Area Coalition for EquitableSchools, cited in DECS 2005c)
Inquiry is an active
search for understanding
which is facilitated by
carefully constructed
questions.
(Yorke-Barr et al 2001, p. 27)
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
The basic
[inquiry approach is to]
look, think, act [which] should
be read as a continually
recycling set of activities.
(Stringer 1999, pp. 18–19)
When we explicitly teach about
respect, will that lead togreater mutual respect
between staff and students?
Fregon Anangu
School
There are a number of models one can use in inquiry-minded improvement. The model used
by 2006 inquiry schools was the ‘structured inquiry model’, which provides a series of
stepped questions:
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
A number of other models can be found on the Learner Wellbeing website.
Figure 5: Inquiry-minded improvement
What is inquiry?
9
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
Structured inquiry modelStep 1: Have we clarified our thinking about learner wellbeing?
Step 2: Site analysis: What are we doing well? Where can we improve?
What data do we have?
Step 3: What is our area of explicit focus for improvement?
Step 4: Using data, what is our initial reflection on our area of focus?
Step 5: What is our overarching inquiry question for our area of focus?
Step 6: Does our strategic action plan include monitoring and documentation?
Step 7: Is it time to reflect?
W
Every time we focus on our practice, wechange things and
improve and this alwaysincreases the quality
(of relationships) for children.
Clare Valley Children’s Centre
When we changethe way in which we
interact with students in the classroom, will levels of engagement improve?
Mawson Lakes
Primary School
(Modified from DECS 2005c)
Research has indicated there are many connections between learning and wellbeing. The process of learning
is dependent upon the learner making complex neural connections. The ability to build these connections is
constrained in a state of prolonged or high anxiety or when subject to distracting outside influences. Within
safe, secure learning environments, where basic needs are met and, furthermore, wellbeing is addressed,
stress and anxiety lowers (Caine & Caine 1994; Goleman 1996).
Positive learning environments allow the connections to be made within learners’ brains and, consequently,
learning flows (Sylwester, cited in Weare 2000). Achieving mastery in an area of learning increases feelings
of wellbeing. There are also skills, abilities and understandings important to the development of wellbeing.
Collectively, these may be referred to as ‘capabilities for wellbeing’ and they can be learned and taught
explicitly. Directly related to the dimensions of wellbeing, these might include, for example, problem solving,
resilience, diet and exercise, effective communication skills and explicitly teaching altruism.
A state of relaxed alertness and a balance of low threat and high challenge are the ideal states for higher
order functioning and the optimal emotional climate for learning (Caine & Caine 1994).
Early experiences influence the development of these brain pathways, especially in the areas of memory,
learning and behaviour. There is ‘increasing evidence that the early period of child development affects
cognition, learning and behaviour in the later stages of life’ (Mustard, 2002, p.23). Further significant neural
development occurs in adolescence as a learner matures into adulthood.
Our society is continually changing and becoming increasingly complex. The challenge for educators is to
think and act responsively in their changing world. Learning needs to provide learners with skills and strategies
to cope with and respond to change; to have a say; and to develop agency that allows them to influence
their current and future world.
Positive relationships are paramount. Educators who are respectful, interested and caring build positive
relationships with learners and those associated with them. Partnerships are fostered through reciprocal
communication and sharing of information. These relationships create optimum conditions for wellbeing
and successful learning. In positive relationships, learners will interact with others; participate; ask
questions; seek help; take risks; and be reassured of their capabilities and worth. These interactions
are central to any new learning. Positive student to student relationships are also influential in
fostering wellbeing.
A whole of site approach to inquiry and improvement in education is the most effective.
Learning is scaffolded with consistent approaches and inclusive policies and practice. A common and
agreed approach will have the greatest educational influence on the future of a learner. At the same time
it also maximises conditions of security and safety. ‘It takes a village to raise a child.’ (African proverb)
10
What are the implications for practice?
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
>
Positive educator
to educator relationships are
the most influential factor for
improvement within education
and care settings.
(Hart et al 2006)
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
It was not until we putwellbeing into the corethat we were able tosee how it impacted on everything we do.
Mawson Lakes
Primary School
When we introducea variety of socially
inclusive strategies andprograms, will this empower our children and families to be more socially inclusive?
Poonindie Community
Kindergarten
A holistic approach to wellbeing ensures maximum benefit for individual learners. It assists educators
to map and inquire into the effectiveness of their practice across the domains and within the dimensions of
wellbeing for individuals, classes and a whole site. Some learners require additional support and others an
individualised strategy to address their wellbeing and learning needs. These needs may be short term or ongoing.
Additional support and tailored strategies build on the universal approaches that promote the wellbeing of all
learners in a site. Figure 6 illustrates a holistic approach to the promotion of learner wellbeing.
An educator’s wellbeing impacts on their ability to influence learner wellbeing. An educator’s wellbeing
is central to their own learning, and continuous learning is central to educator wellbeing. How an educator
deals with their own stress or high anxiety can impact on their ability to create safe, secure learning
environments for their learners.
Everything educators do has the potential to influence wellbeing.
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
Figure 6: A holistic approach to promote learner wellbeing
11
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
Universal care and education services
Additional support
Tailoredintervention
Individualsor groups
of learners requiring
additional support
Decre
asing
numbe
r of le
arne
rs
Learners requiring
individualised strategy
Incr
easi
ng in
volv
emen
t of D
ECS
dist
rict a
nd s
tate
wid
e su
ppor
t ser
vice
s an
d/or
oth
er a
genc
ies
All learners
What are the implications for practice?
What are the links to South Australian Curriculum Standards
and Accountability (SACSA) Framework?Wellbeing is an integral aspect of curriculum and pedagogy. The processes used for curriculum delivery
have the ability to improve or hinder wellbeing. Constructivist learning is the optimum process for
promoting wellbeing. This process builds on and respects a learner’s prior knowledge, experiences,
interests, differences and culture. It encourages learner dialogue, questioning, initiative, creativity and
reflection. The learner makes choices in their learning and is an active participant, both in the learning
and in the assessment of their progress and achievement. This learning cycle model, whilst it takes
time, also assists learners to make learning connections and accept differing perspectives.
In particular, the Essential Learnings within the SACSA Framework outline capabilities crucial to
developing learner wellbeing:
• Futures: developing the flexibility to respond to change and have a say in one’s future
• Identity: developing a sense of self, and respect for other individuals and groups
• Interdependence: developing the ability to work in cross-cultural harmony with others for common good
• Thinking: developing the ability to question, appraise, make decisions, and to be innovative and creative
• Communication: developing the ability to communicate across a range of media.
Connections and coherenceThe Wellbeing Framework assists sites to draw together, connect, and make coherent a range of DECS
policies, programs and projects that equip learners to act for their own and others’ wellbeing. Some are
listed below and sites may add their own:
• health promotion
• being active
• mentoring/buddying/cross-age tutoring
• behaviour management
• learning and transition pathways
• individualised learning plans/learning styles
• child protection
• attendance
• student voice/community projects/citizenship
• beliefs and values
• drug strategies
• safe schools
•
•
•
•
•
12
What are the implications for practice?
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
One of the mostpositive aspects of a
wellbeing inquiry is thatit acts as a catalyst for so many otherquestions…about
resilience, connected-ness, mentoring,
induction of staff andstudents, self-esteem,
problem-solving…
Tintinara Area School
How does ourfocus on wellbeing
contribute to an effectiveplay-based curriculum?
Murray Bridge South
Kindergarten
What are thepreferred learning styles
of our present year 8 students? What methodologiesand learning experiences are
engaging students at present?
Waikerie
High School
Evaluation is an element throughout the inquiry process. As the word suggests, evaluate means
placing a value, a standard or making a judgement of worth on information gathered (Smith &
Lovat 1990). Effective site-based evaluation will demonstrate the improvement or the ‘distance
travelled’ in a rigorous inquiry into learner wellbeing. It allows a site to collect evidence, reflect on
changes achieved and to be accountable to their community. Key components of change include
improvement in outcomes for learners, educator practice, and site policy and practice.
Evaluation can incorporate existing, site adapted, and/or site developed material and tools such as:
• audits • questionnaires • dialogues
• mapping • video records • reports
• rubrics • photographic records • vignettes
• data collection • observations • and more
• socio-grams • learning stories
• surveys • professional journals
Existing data collection tools include the following:
• social and emotional wellbeing surveys
• audits of site practices
• levels of involvement indicators, for example, from Ferre Laevers
• annual report surveys, for example, in the DECS Improvement and Accountability
Framework (DIAF)
• behaviour and attendance data, for example, from EDSAS and Dux Assists
• achievement software, for example, in SACSA.
Using both qualitative and quantitative forms of data will deepen an inquiry. Data collection needs
to respond to the local context: it is most useful and relevant when developed inside the inquiry
process. It can be used to inform and document significant learning in the inquiry journey. Dialogue
about developing evaluation processes, the information a site decides to collect and what it implies
can be as important as the actual data collected.
Examples of reflective questions to deepen the dialogue are:
• What is the most effective way to gain the information we need for our inquiry?
• What is actually happening here?
• What are we doing well?
• Are all voices being heard: leaders, educators, learners, parents and other partners?
• Who is being advantaged and/or disadvantaged?
• What is the evaluation telling us?
• How do we build sustainability into our change practice?
In conclusion we will know we have made a difference when our indicators and evidence show:
• Learners are engaged in learning and their wellbeing is optimised.
• Educators are professionally excited and engaged in their work together.
• Community partnerships are strongly interconnected.
• Curriculum and pedagogy, policy and practice are congruent and coherent.
• Wellbeing initiatives and changes are ongoing and sustainable.
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
How do we know we are making a difference?
13
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
>
W
By bringing to life our values, will itimprove our staff andstudent relationships?
McDonald Park
School
14
References
DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework for birth to year 12
www.schools.sa.gov.au/schlstaff/pages/learnerwellbeingproject
Caine R & Caine G (1994) Making
connections: teaching and the
human brain, Addison-Wesley,
Menlo Park, CA: also available
through Cain Publications at
www.cainelearning.com (accessed
15 November 2006)
Department of Education and
Children’s Services (2005a)
Wellbeing is central to learning,
DECS, Adelaide
Department of Education and
Children’s Services (2005b)
Statement of Directions
2005–2010, DECS, Adelaide
Department of Education and
Children’s Services (2005c) Moving
forward with SACSA Strategy, CD-
ROM, DECS, Adelaide
Department of Education and
Children’s Services (2006) Towards
a Learner Wellbeing Framework for
birth to year 12, DECS, Adelaide
Department of Education,
Training and Employment
(2001) South Australian
Curriculum, Standards
and Accountability
Framework, DETE,
Adelaide
Gammage P (2004)
‘Well-being and visible
pedagogies: making the
implicit explicit’, unpublished
paper delivered at DECS
Leaders Forum on Wellbeing,
November 2004
Goleman D (1996) Emotional
intelligence, Bloomsbury, London
Hart PM, Lewis M, McIntosh M
& Dingle R (2006)’Using staff,
student and parent opinion surveys
to drive school improvement: a
diagnostic and development guide’,
unpublished manuscript, Insight
SRC, Melbourne
Hunter Institute of Mental Health
(2006) ‘Social and emotional
wellbeing’ Response ABILITY:
Mental health resources for tertiary
education, website initiative of the
Australian Government Department
of Health and Ageing. Implemented
by the Hunter Institute of Mental
Health available at www.response
ability.org (accessed 22 November
2006)
Ministerial Council on Education,
Employment, Training and Youth
Affairs, 1999, The Adelaide
Declaration on National Goals for
Schooling in the Twenty-first
Century, Curriculum Corporation,
Victoria, available at www.mceetya.
edu.au/mceetya/nationalgoals
(accessed 20 November 2006)
Mustard F (2002) ‘Early childhood
development and the brain—the
base for health, learning and
behaviour throughout life’ in ME
Young (Ed) From Early Childhood
Development to Human Develop-
ment, The World Bank, Washington
National Crime Prevention (1999)
‘Pathways to prevention: Develop-
mental and early intervention
approaches to crime in Australia’,
Attorney-General’s Department,
Canberra
Pollard E & Davidson L (2001)
‘Foundations of child well-being’,
Action Research in Family and
Early Childhood Monograph Series,
UNESCO, Paris
Reid A (2004) Towards a culture of
inquiry in DECS, Occasional Paper
No 1, Department of Education
and Children’s Services, Adelaide
Roberts R (2005) ‘Companionable
learning from birth to three years: the
foundation of resilient wellbeing?’,
paper delivered to the 15th annual
conference of European Early
Childhood Education Research
Association, Dublin
Shah H & Marks N (2004) A well-
being manifesto for a flourishing
society, New Economics Foundation
(nef), London
Smith DL & Lovat TJ (2003)
Curriculum—action on reflection,
(4th edition), Social Science Press,
Sydney
Stringer, ET (1999) Action research:
2nd edition, SACE Publications,
Thousand Oaks, Cal
United Nations (1959) Declaration of
the Rights of the Child, available at
www.un.org/cyberschoolbus/human
rights/resources/child.asp
(accessed 10 November 2006)
Weare K (2000) Promoting mental,
emotional and social health: a whole
school approach, Routledge,
London
Yorke-Barr J, Sommers WA, Ghere
GS & Montie J (2001) Reflective
practice to improve schools: An
action guide for educators, Corwin
Press, California
>
ISBN 9781921233043 • 1 921233 04 4 > R4929/2
Wellbeing is the combined physical, social,emotional, cognitive and spiritual state of being.Positive wellbeing includes being optimisticand engaging with life. It means having a senseof purpose, self-acceptance and positiverelationships.
The DECS Learner Wellbeing Framework forbirth to year 12 has been constructed inresponse to and with the input of stakeholdersacross all levels of DECS. It is both theoreticallysound and grounded in practice. Through aninquiry-minded approach, the DECS LearnerWellbeing Framework for birth to year 12 willassist sites in laying the foundations for ongoingsustainable improvements in learner wellbeing,both now and in the future.